The Parallel Importation Myth

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Parallel Importation Myth Fidus Law Chambers The parallel importation myth Brand owners have long felt the law to be The decision on whether to permit on the side of parallel importers. However, parallel importation of IP-protected products recent case law offers another perspective is a fine balancing act, and usually involves an extremely subjective determination by each country regarding the pros and cons of By Shwetasree Majumder and Eashan Ghosh, parallel importation relative to that country. Fidus Law Chambers On the whole, a national exhaustion regime which outlaws parallel importation is seen Parallel importation has increasingly become as fortifying rights holders’ freedom to sell a flashpoint for commercial entities that products in the host market on their own own intellectual property. In the trademark terms and giving them strong control over context, it refers to the act of importing into virtually every stage of the marketing process, and selling in the host market products that including pricing, product differentiation and were purchased legally in another market, but after-sales customer services. An international not from the trademark holder’s authorised exhaustion regime, on the other hand, is more distribution channels. laissez-faire, and permits parallel importers to offer stiff pricing competition to rights holders, Legislation in addition to promoting local peripheral Until October 2012, a definitive Indian businesses – although possibly, in cases trademark law position on the legality of parallel where the law is blurred as to the extent of importation was conspicuous by its absence. legality, at the cost of exposing consumers to This was brought into sharp relief by the fact confusion and quality-related risk, since they that other branches of intellectual property (eg, are now confronted with seemingly genuine patent and copyright) clearly and statutorily products sold outside the rights holder’s support the legality of parallel importation. traditional model of authorised sellers or Central to determining the legality of franchisees. It is no secret that even though parallel importation is the principle of the India is swarming with importers of authentic exhaustion of rights – that is, the question and legally imported products from abroad, of whether a rights holder can prevent the this parallel import channel is prone to abuse, importation of the product into a market raising concerns about product dumping and where it holds exclusive rights. For legal and product safety in the long run. Given these policy reasons, most countries take one of two complications, therefore, it is no surprise that broad stances: the World Trade Organisation, through Article • international exhaustion – a rights holder’s 6 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects rights (eg, preventing the importation and of IP Rights (TRIPs), leaves the decision of what re-sale of its product) are exhausted once the kind of exhaustion of rights regime to follow product is sold anywhere in the world); and up to individual countries. • national exhaustion – a rights holder’s The Indian trademark law dealing with rights are exhausted only by sale in the parallel imports is captured in Section 30 market in which it holds rights. of the TRIPs-compliant Trademarks Act www.theipmediagroup.com India: Managing the IP Lifecycle 2013 63 Fidus Law Chambers Customs has consistently taken the position that as long as goods are genuine and all relevant taxes and duties have been paid, it will not seize such goods at the borders 1999, which sets down limitations on the that Customs is a division of the Ministry of exploitation of trademark rights by rights Finance, which obtains revenue from imports). holders. Early instances of trademark litigation However, a violation of the law pertaining to before the Indian courts regarding parallel packaging and labelling, weights and measures imports were largely uncontested injunction or food adulteration would render parallel orders, in which the courts appeared happy imported goods separately actionable with to issue orders stopping parallel imports by Customs, albeit not under the 2007 rules. small-time traders on the grounds that these imports involved the unauthorised use of Judicial interpretation various rights holders’ trademarks. The most prominent judgment on the legality Nevertheless, these early cases were notable of parallel imports under trademark law more for the fact that small-time traders was issued in October 2012 by the Division attempted to pass off the parallel imported Bench of the Delhi High Court in Kapil products as products imported or authorised Wadhwa v Samsung Electronics – a case that by the rights holders, rather than the courts was tailormade for testing the exceptions making any specific ruling on the substance of to trademark infringement provided under the legal provisions on trademark infringement. Section 30 of the Trademarks Act. The appellant Provisions relating to imported products purchased Samsung printers after their first were expressly included in the Intellectual sale in another country and then imported Property (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules them into and sold them in India. Samsung 2007 and further notifications issued under the claimed trademark infringement on account rules, which for the first time permitted rights of the presence of the SAMSUNG trademark on holders to record their registered trademarks, products imported and sold by the appellant copyrights and patents with the commissioner without its authorisation. The Division Bench’s of customs, and thereafter request the ruling is interesting as it noted that even suspension of imported products suspected of the products sold by Samsung in India were infringing their IP rights. These rules, contrary imported; therefore, Samsung’s objection to popular perception, do not outlaw all types could be distilled down to “a difference in the of product bearing infringing trademarks; features of the compatible products”. rather, they specifically apply only to products The key holding of the Division Bench was bearing a false trademark or a false trade its interpretation of Section 30 as supporting description. Thus, Customs has consistently the principle of international exhaustion. This taken the position that as long as goods are was based on two grounds: genuine and all relevant taxes and duties have • a purely interpretive legal ground, to the been paid, it will not seize such goods at the effect that the section used the expression borders (an understandable position, given ‘the market’ in a manner consistent with 64 India: Managing the IP Lifecycle 2013 www.theipmediagroup.com Fidus Law Chambers the generic placing of products in the apply to goods which were stolen or smuggled commercial stream, and not in reference to a by the importer into the country from where it specific, geographically limited market; and is importing them into India. Such goods will be • reliance on the legislative history of the infringing goods from the outset, since lawful section to support the view that the market acquisition is an essential qualification for the at issue was indeed the global market. further handling of the goods. Another notable aspect of the Division Legitimate reasons to oppose parallel Bench ruling was a disavowal of the policy importation behind the decision to pick one type of Section 30(4) protects the rights holder’s right exhaustion regime over another, although to oppose further dealings in the goods bearing in addressing Samsung’s arguments on the its trademark. India recognises a rather broad benefits of national exhaustion, the Division ‘legitimate reasons’ exception to international Bench noted that national exhaustion may exhaustion, while specifically setting down a not necessarily encourage industry – as in ‘change or impairment’ exception. This is in the present case, a manufacturer abroad addition to the explicit exception that applies may simply get its trademark registered in a in instances where the importer changes or country and import goods manufactured by impairs the condition of the (parallel imported) it in a foreign country. Consequently, dual goods after the rights holder placed them on pricing may cause injury to the consumer, the market. The Division Bench’s decision as was exhibited in this case by the fact that embraced this position and highlighted what the functional equivalents of the products could be specific instances of legitimate reasons imported and sold by the appellant were to oppose parallel imports. The court observed: cheaper than Samsung’s pricing in India. it would be relevant to note that further The judgment was widely misunderstood dealing in the goods placed in the market in the IP community as encouraging the under a trade mark can be opposed where flooding of the Indian market with grey-market legitimate reasons exist to oppose further goods. However, the decision should be seen dealing and in particular where the condition as clarifying the unsettled legal position by of the goods has been changed or impaired. distinguishing between parallel imports which With respect to physical condition being are actionable and those which are not. changed or impaired, even in the absence of a statutory provision, the registered Tackling parallel importation – lessons for proprietor of a trade mark would have the brand owners right to oppose further dealing in those goods When viewing the issue from a rights holder’s inasmuch as they would be the same goods perspective, it must be remembered that improperly so called, or to put it differently, Indian trademark law provides for a range if a physical condition of goods is changed, it of exceptions to the principle under which a would no longer be the same goods. But, sub- rights holder can oppose parallel importation section 4 of Section 30 is not restricted to only – a fact recognised by the Division Bench. Such when the conditions of the goods has been exceptions are set out in Sections 30(3) and (4) changed or impaired after they have been of the Trademarks Act, as follows.
Recommended publications
  • Re-Importation (Parallel Trade) in Pharmaceuticals
    IPI CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY FREEDOM Re-importation (Parallel Trade) in Pharmaceuticals By Jacob Arfwedson POLICY REPORT 182 JULY 2004 E S Supporters of parallel trade in pharmaceuticals argue that it lower prices, which is popular with consumers and cash-strapped governments. But in fact parallel trade reduces safety, since it represents an end-run around domestic inspection procedures. More importantly, re-importa- tion undermines intellectual property protection and hence incentives to invest in research and development of IP-based products; which will have ominous implications for consumers in the long-run. Re-importation (or parallel trade as it is known in Europe) occurs when products protected by patent, trademark or copyright are first placed into circulation on one market, then (re-) imported into a second market without the authorization of the original owner of the intellectual property rights (IPRs). Myriad products are re-imported, including automobiles, clothing, perfume and other consumer goods. This paper focuses on re-importation of pharmaceuticals, with a special focus on Europe. How- ever, the paper could not be timelier in the United States, where the House of Representatives voted in late July 2003 on re-importing Canadian prescription drugs into the US. This paper as- sesses whether parallel trade is generally valid, concluding that the net economic effects cannot be established empirically but that there may be significant long run harms to innovation if parallel trade grows indefinitely. IPRs are limited rights conferred by governments over certain products of the intellect (e.g. patents which protect inventions, copyrights which protect expressions of ideas and trademarks which protect brands).
    [Show full text]
  • To Scholars and Students Interested in Hungarian, East Europe'an, and Cold War History
    to scholars and students interested in Hungarian, East Europe'an, and Cold War history. A basic knowledge of Hungarian history will be useful to gain full advantage of this work. The image of Hungary as the "first domino" in the eventual collapse of Soviet hegemony over Eastern Europe is perhaps a little too deterministic. Granville's text makes clear that she also believes that chance plays a role in decision making and history in general. Granville concludes that "multiarchival research tends to confirm the postrevisionists' theory about the Cold War: it was everyone's fault and no one's fault. It resulted from the emerging bipolar structure of the international system, a power vacuum in the center of Europe, and spiraling misconceptions." (p. 214) John C. Swanson Utica College of Syracuse University After the Collapse of Communism: Comparative Lessons of Transition. Edited by Mi- chael McFaul and Kathryn Stoner-Weiss. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2004. vii, 264 pp. $60.00. This book derives from an autumn 2000 politics conference at Princeton marking one decade after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Six of seven papers focus on political de- velopments in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Republics (FSU). One paper deals with economics and four concentrate on Russia. The title suggests an overview of social progress a decade after the fall. The book is better understood as a collection of papers on politics each of which is a step along a re- search agenda. I recommend it to anyone concerned with democracy or with politics after the collapse.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement in Armenia
    State of intellectual property protection and enforcement in Armenia 2020 Supported by Implemented by Table of contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 5 About Editors ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 Contribution of IP system and IP protection to economic growth and development .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Importance of efficient IP system for economic growth and development ............. 13 1.2. Importance of IP protection for national economies ............................................... 15 Chapter 2. Current state of the IP system in Armenia ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 5-2012 Market Integration and (the Limits of) the First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law Irene Calboli [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Irene Calboli, Market Integration and (the Limits of) the First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1241 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/362 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARKET INTEGRATION AND (THE LIMITS OF) THE FIRST SALE RULE IN NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN TRADEMARK LAW Irene Calboli* I. INTRODUCTION The relationship between exclusive trademark rights and the free movement of goods across international borders has historically represented one of the most heated topics of discussion in the international trademark debate.' In a previous work published a few years ago, I analyzed this topic in the context of European trademark law and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).2 In this Article I * Associate Professor of Law and Director, Intellectual Property and Technology Program, Marquette University Law School; Spring 2011 CIPLIT Visiting Professor of Law, DePaul University College of Law. I would like to thank Eric Goldman for the invitation to speak at the "Exhaustion and First Sale in Intellectual Property" conference held at Santa Clara University School of Law on November 5, 2010, and for his insightful suggestions during the research and writing of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Patents Exemption Right As A
    AGAINST THE PLAGUE: EXEMPTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PATENT RIGHTS AS A BIOSECURITY STRATEGY Taiwo A. Oriola* I. INTRODUCTION Acts of terrorism involve threats to use or use of weapons of mass destruction to kill, maim, or destroy property by individuals, groups, or states1 mainly on political grounds, and for maximum political effects.2 Terror attacks are characterized by stealth, indiscriminate violence, and destruction meant to heighten people’s fears and concerns for their lives and property.3 As terrorism has increased, so have the number of counterterrorism strategies by governments around the world.4 However, terrorism is as old as mankind.5 * Cardiff Law School, and the ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability, & Society, University of Cardiff, United Kingdom. 1. An early example of a state-sponsored terrorist was the Roman emperor Nero, who ruled by fear, slaughtered many members of the nobility, and has been blamed for the burning of Rome. CINDY C. COMBS & MARTIN SLANN, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TERRORISM 201 (2002). Dysfunctional or anarchistic individuals or groups acting alone or in concert can perpetrate terrorist attacks. See Jonathan Glover, State Terrorism, in VIOLENCE, TERRORISM, AND JUSTICE 256, 257-60 (Raymond G. Frey & Christopher W. Morris eds., 1991) (contrasting historical state and independent terrorists, highlighting essential features of state-sponsored terrorism, and explaining why states commit acts of terrorism). 2. Political motivation has been described as “a necessary component to a definition of terrorism.” COMBS & SLANN, supra note 1, at 211. For examples of statutory definitions of terrorism, see Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001, Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Brief
    Court of Justice of the European Union Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne L – 2925 Luxembourg RE: Joint Cases C-253/20 Novartis AG v. Impexeco NV and C-254/20 Novartis AG v. PI Pharma NV September 28, 2020 Amicus Submission – International Trademark Association The International Trademark Association (“INTA”) has prepared this Submission in relation to the joint cases C-253/20 “Impexeco” Novartis AG v. Impexeco NV, and C-254/20 “PI Pharma”, Novartis AG v. PI Pharma NV, pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which request preliminary rulings under article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) referred by the Brussels Court of Appeal. A. INTA’s interest in the cases INTA is not a party in the cases and acknowledges that the CJEU does not have a procedure for accepting an amicus curiae intervention stricto sensu. INTA, however, believes that the joint cases are significant to the development of trademark law and presents itself as an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) in these matters, as it has done in the past (see Annex A listing previous amicus interventions by INTA before European courts). INTA hopes that this submission may be of assistance to the Court. B. About INTA INTA is a global association of brand owners and professionals dedicated to supporting trademarks and related intellectual property (IP) to foster consumer trust, economic growth, and innovation. Members include nearly 6,500 organizations, representing more than 34,350 individuals (trademark owners, professionals, and academics) from 185 countries, who benefit from the Association’s global trademark resources, policy development, education and training, and international network.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)
    COMMODITY REPORT BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan SIMONE HAYSOM I MICHAEL McLAGGAN JULIUS KAKA I LUCY MODI I KEN OPALA MARCH 2021 BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan ww Simone Haysom I Michael McLaggan Julius Kaka I Lucy Modi I Ken Opala March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank everyone who gave their time to be interviewed for this study. They would like to extend particular thanks to Dr Catherine Nabukalu, at the University of Pennsylvania, and Bryan Adkins, at UNEP, for playing an invaluable role in correcting our misperceptions and deepening our analysis. We would also like to thank Nhial Tiitmamer, at the Sudd Institute, for providing us with additional interviews and information from South Sudan at short notice. Finally, we thank Alex Goodwin for excel- lent editing. Interviews were conducted in South Sudan, Uganda and Kenya between February 2020 and November 2020. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simone Haysom is a senior analyst at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), with expertise in urban development, corruption and organized crime, and over a decade of experience conducting qualitative fieldwork in challenging environments. She is currently an associate of the Oceanic Humanities for the Global South research project based at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Ken Opala is the GI-TOC analyst for Kenya. He previously worked at Nation Media Group as deputy investigative editor and as editor-in-chief at the Nairobi Law Monthly. He has won several journalistic awards in his career.
    [Show full text]
  • TPP Derechos C Parallel Imports and Exhaustion.Pdf
    Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) Intellectual Property Chapter Concerns COPYRIGHT, PARALLEL IMPORTS AND EXHAUSTION OF DISTRIBUTION RIGHTS Derechos Digitales - Chile Known proposal1 Article 4.2. Each Party shall provide to authors, performers, and producers of phonograms the right to authorize or prohibit the importation into that Party’s territory of copies of the work, performance, or phonogram made without authorization, or made outside that Party’s territory with the authorization of the author, performer, or producer of the phonogram.fn. 11 fn. 11 With respect to copies of works and phonograms that have been placed on the market by the relevant right holder, the obligations described in Article [4.2] apply only to books, journals, sheet music, sound recordings, computer programs, and audio and visual works (i.e., categories of products in which the value of the copyrighted material represents substantially all of the value of the product). Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Party may provide the protection described in Article [4.2] to a broader range of goods. The context • This proposal touches upon two copyright-related issues2: the right of parallel importation of copyrighted goods lawfully made abroad, and the exhaustion of distribution rights after first transfer of property. In effect, this creates a new exclusive right, without necessary support from research, precedent or previous international law. • Currently, no intellectual property treaty grants copyright holders an exclusive right to control the importation of works. Article 6(2) of the WCT, and Articles 8(2) and 12(2) of the WPPT, deal with the issue of the exhaustion of the right of distribution for authors, performers and producers of phonograms respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising
    TRADEMARK, COPYRIGHT & ADVERTISING Locke Lord’s Looking Ahead 2011 Expect Fierce Battles Over Keyword Confusion Google’s AdWords program earns billions of dollars from the sale of trademark “keywords.” Competitors use trademark keywords to bring consumers to their ads displayed on Google’s Search Results page. Competitors pay Google a fee each time a user clicks on their ad. Looking ahead to 2011, expect to see: 1) ramped up battles over confusion arising from the use of trademark keywords; and 2) Google’s replacement of the term ”Sponsored Link” with the word “Ads,” on Google’s Search Results page. 53 • Looking Ahead 2011 • Trademark, Copyright & Advertising Trademark Trends The Fourth Circuit will be a primary battlefield on the keyword front in 2011. See Rosetta Stone’s appeal of the district court decision Trademark forecasts for 2011 show strong winds in Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google Inc., 2010 WL 3063152 (E.D. Va. blowing in the direction of: Aug. 3, 2010). The district court saw nothing wrong with Google’s • Expanded application of the Fair Use doctrine making money from its sale of trademark keywords and denied all permitting defendants greater freedom to use plaintiff’s of Rosetta Stone’s claims on summary judgment. In finding no likely mark to 1) describe defendant’s goods; and 2) refer confusion, the court: to plaintiff. • Dismissed Rosetta Stone’s evidence of actual confusion • Expanded use of the First Amendment right of free as “de minimus.” speech to exempt non-commercial parody, criticism and comment from liability. • Disregarded as “unreliable” Rosetta Stone’s survey showing consumers thought Rosetta Stone endorsed the competitor’s ad.
    [Show full text]
  • Pekka Pättiniemi, Heloisa Perista, Victor Pestoff, Roger Spear, Yohanan Stryjan, Isabel Vidal and Flaviano Zandonai
    IMAGES AND CONCEPTS OF THE THIRD SECTOR IN EUROPE Jacques DEFOURNY Victor PESTOFF (eds.) WP no. 08/02 with the collaboration of Carlo Borzaga, Jacques Defourny, Bernard Enjolras, Adalbert Evers, Laurent Fraisse, Giulia Galera, Jean-Louis Laville, Eva Leś, Vincent Lhuillier, Anne Liveng, Mary O'Shaughnessy, Pekka Pättiniemi, Heloisa Perista, Victor Pestoff, Roger Spear, Yohanan Stryjan, Isabel Vidal and Flaviano Zandonai © EMES European Research Network 2008 Table of contents Towards a European conceptualization of the third sector.........................................................3 Belgium.....................................................................................................................................11 Denmark....................................................................................................................................13 Finland .....................................................................................................................................15 France........................................................................................................................................17 Germany....................................................................................................................................19 Ireland.......................................................................................................................................21 Italy...........................................................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Property Newsletter
    Intellectual Property Newsletter April 2012 Editorial Board IP Newsletter Hong Kong Please direct questions and comments regarding the Henry Wheare Intellectual Property newsletter to: [email protected] Verena von Bomhard London [email protected] Adam Cooke Adam Cooke [email protected] [email protected] Los Angeles Juliane Diefenbach Stephen H. Kay [email protected] [email protected] Leopold von Gerlach Madrid [email protected] Burkhart Goebel Raymond A. Kurz [email protected] [email protected] Milan Ted Mlynar Luigi Mansani [email protected] [email protected] Moscow Natalia Gulyaeva [email protected] Further Information Munich For advice and information on Hogan Lovells' Intellectual Matthias Koch Property practice please contact: [email protected] Alicante New York Verena von Bomhard Eric J. Lobenfeld [email protected] [email protected] Amsterdam Northern Virginia Bert Oosting Timothy J. Lyden [email protected] [email protected] Beijing Paris Deanna Wong Marie-Aimée de Dampierre [email protected] [email protected] Berlin Philadelphia Christoph Wagner Katherine R. Leibowitz [email protected] [email protected] Colorado Springs San Francisco William J. Kubida K.T. (Sunny) Cherian [email protected] [email protected] Denver Shanghai Clay C. James William Fisher [email protected] [email protected] Düsseldorf Tokyo Andreas von Falck Lloyd Parker [email protected] [email protected] Frankfurt Warsaw Nils Rauer Ewa Kacperek [email protected] [email protected] Hamburg Washington, D.C. Leopold von Gerlach Raymond A.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Importation: Economic and Social Welfare Dimensions
    Parallel Importation: Economic and social welfare dimensions Frederick M. Abbott June 2007 Prepared for the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) © 2007 International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy recommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management. Through the Internet, we report on international negotiations and share knowledge gained through collaborative projects with global partners, resulting in more rigorous research, capacity building in developing countries and better dialogue between North and South. IISD’s vision is better living for all—sustainably; its mission is to champion innovation, enabling societies to live sustainably. IISD is registered as a charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support from the Government of Canada, provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and Environment Canada; and from the Province of Manitoba. The institute receives project funding from numerous governments inside and outside Canada, United Nations agencies, foundations and the private sector. International Institute for Sustainable Development 161 Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 0Y4 Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 Fax: +1 (204) 958-7710 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.iisd.org/ Parallel Importation: Economic and social welfare dimensions By Frederick M. Abbott, Edward Ball Eminent Scholar Professor of International Law, Florida State University College of Law. June 2007 Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]