View PDF Version
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Anyone for Slugs? - Densey Clyne
Anyone for Slugs? - Densey Clyne No, thank you very much, you will be thinking. Slimy pests with no redeeming features at all - away with them! Well yes, some of them, but others deserve a closer look. If I had not become so thoroughly captivated by six-legged and eight-legged arthropods so early in my life I believe it would have been the slugs and snails that took my fancy. There is something so elegant about a snail gliding along, rather like a ship on a calm sea, and the courtship and mating habits of slugs can be spectacular. But one particular kind of slug has always intrigued me. Over the summer months one of the smooth-barked gumtrees in my Wauchope garden acquires an artistic pattern of meandering squiggles. One rainy night I went out after dark and there was the artist, moving very slowly high up on a branch - my old friend first met in Sydney, the Red Triangle slug, Triboniophorus graeffei. It was my first sighting of the slug in my new garden though I had recognised its squiggles on the gumtree. This year I’ve been excited to find them for the first time on my crepe Triboniophorus graeffei on gumtree myrtle trees, planted 5 years ago. I first got to know these slugs years ago in an overgrown Sydney suburban garden where giant bluegums grew on rich soil and it rained a lot. The slugs had taken a liking to a mature crepe myrtle tree, adding an extra touch to its beautifully patterned trunk. As well as being much bigger - up to 140mm - these slugs were different from any other slugs I knew. -
Barbed Wire Vine
Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Compiled by: Michael Fox www.megoutlook.org/flora-fauna/ © 2015-17 Creative Commons – free use with attribution to Mt Gravatt Environment Group Ants Dolichoderinae Iridomyrmex sp. Small Meat Ant Attendant “Kropotkin” ants with caterpillar of Imperial Hairstreak butterfly. Ants provide protection in return for sugary fluids secreted by the caterpillar. Note the strong jaws. These ants don’t sting but can give a powerful bite. Kropotkin is a reference to Russian biologist Peter Kropotkin who proposed a concept of evolution based on “mutual aid” helping species from ants to higher mammals survive. 22-Aug-17 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.4 Page 1 of 51 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Opisthopsis rufithorax Black-headed Strobe Ant 22-Aug-17 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.4 Page 2 of 51 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Camponotus consobrinus Banded Sugar Ant Size 10mm Eggs in rotting log Formicinae Camponotus nigriceps Black-headed Sugar Ant 22-Aug-17 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.4 Page 3 of 51 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve 22-Aug-17 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.4 Page 4 of 51 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Polyrhachis ammon Golden-tailed Spiny Ant Large spines at rear of thorax Nest 22-Aug-17 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.4 Page 5 of 51 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Polyrhachis australis Rattle Ant Black Weaver Ant or Dome-backed Spiny Ant Feeding on sugar secretions produced by Redgum Lerp Psyllid. -
Insects, Beetles, Bugs and Slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve
Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Compiled by: Michael Fox www.megoutlook.org/flora-fauna/ © 2015-20 Creative Commons – free use with attribution to Mt Gravatt Environment Group Ants Dolichoderinae Iridomyrmex sp. Small Meat Ant Attendant “Kropotkin” ants with caterpillar of Imperial Hairstreak butterfly. Ants provide protection in return for sugary fluids secreted by the caterpillar. Note the strong jaws. These ants don’t sting but can give a powerful bite. Kropotkin is a reference to Russian biologist Peter Kropotkin who proposed a concept of evolution based on “mutual aid” helping species from ants to higher mammals survive. 4-Nov-20 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.9.docx Page 1 of 59 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Opisthopsis rufithorax Black-headed Strobe Ant Formicinae Camponotus consobrinus Banded Sugar Ant Size 10mm Eggs in rotting log 4-Nov-20 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.9.docx Page 2 of 59 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Camponotus nigriceps Black-headed Sugar Ant 4-Nov-20 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.9.docx Page 3 of 59 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Polyrhachis ammon Golden-tailed Spiny Ant Large spines at rear of thorax Nest 4-Nov-20 Insects Beetles and Bugs - ver 5.9.docx Page 4 of 59 Mt Gravatt Environment Group – www.megoutlook.wordpress.com Insects, beetles, bugs and slugs of Mt Gravatt Conservation Reserve Formicinae Polyrhachis australis Rattle Ant Black Weaver Ant or Dome-backed Spiny Ant Feeding on sugar secretions produced by Redgum Lerp Psyllid. -
Biological Catalysis of the Hydrological Cycle: Life's Thermodynamic Function
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 8, C1907–C1919, Hydrology and 2011 Earth System www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/8/C1907/2011/ Sciences © Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under Discussions the Creative Commons Attribute 3.0 License. Interactive comment on “Biological catalysis of the hydrological cycle: life’s thermodynamic function” by K. Michaelian K. Michaelian karo@fisica.unam.mx Received and published: 2 June 2011 Complete response to Prof. Schymanski: General Comments In a preliminary response to Prof. Schymanski and the anonymous referee (Michaelian, 2011a), I clarified that my paper neither invokes, nor requires, the “maximum entropy production principle”. The paper simply associates Onsager’s principle (1931) of the coupling of irreversible processes, and the associated increase in entropy production, with the evidence (e.g. Zotin, 1984) for an increase in the amount of coupling of irre- versible biotic processes over the history of life on Earth. The hypothesis of my paper C1907 is that biological irreversible processes also couple with abiotic irreversible processes, in particular, that biology catalyzes the hydrological cycle. This coupling augments the global entropy production of Earth in its solar environment, in accordance with Onsager’s principle. I also suggested in my preliminary response that the particular history of Earth with regard to entropy production would depend very much on par- ticular initial conditions (even microscopic), the kinetics (dependent on the particular forces) and subsequent external perturbations (even microscopic). This dependence arises because the Earth system under the solar photon flux is non-linear and out of equilibrium (Prigogine, 1972). Prof. Schymanski asks; 1) ”What is the mechanism that selects for biota that contribute more to planetary entropy production over such that contribute less but invest more e.g. -
The Importance of Ecological Memory for Trophic Rewilding As an Ecosystem Restoration Approach
Biol. Rev. (2019), 94,pp.1–15. 1 doi: 10.1111/brv.12432 The importance of ecological memory for trophic rewilding as an ecosystem restoration approach 1,2,4 1,3 1,2 Andreas H. Schweiger ∗ , Isabelle Boulangeat , Timo Conradi , Matt Davis1,4 and Jens-Christian Svenning1,4 1Section for Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark 2Plant Ecology, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, 95440, Bayreuth, Germany 3University Grenoble Alpes, Irstea, UR LESSEM, 2 rue de la Papeterie-BP 76, F-38402, St-Martin-d’H`eres, France 4Center for Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World (BIOCHANGE), Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark ABSTRACT Increasing human pressure on strongly defaunated ecosystems is characteristic of the Anthropocene and calls for proactive restoration approaches that promote self-sustaining, functioning ecosystems. However, the suitability of novel restoration concepts such as trophic rewilding is still under discussion given fragmentary empirical data and limited theory development. Here, we develop a theoretical framework that integrates the concept of ‘ecological memory’ into trophic rewilding. The ecological memory of an ecosystem is defined as an ecosystem’s accumulated abiotic and biotic material and information legacies from past dynamics. By summarising existing knowledge about the ecological effects of megafauna extinction and rewilding across a large range of spatial and temporal scales, we identify two key drivers of ecosystem responses to trophic rewilding: (i) impact potential of (re)introduced megafauna, and (ii) ecological memory characterising the focal ecosystem. The impact potential of (re)introduced megafauna species can be estimated from species properties such as lifetime per capita engineering capacity, population density, home range size and niche overlap with resident species. -
8.01 the Early History of Life E
8.01 The Early History of Life E. G. Nisbet and C. M. R. Fowler Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK 8.01.1 INTRODUCTION 2 8.01.1.1 Strangeness and Familiarity—The Youth of the Earth 2 8.01.1.2 Evidence in Rocks, Moon, Planets, and Meteorites—The Sources of Information 3 8.01.1.3 Reading the Palimpsests—Using Evidence from the Modern Earth and Biology to Reconstruct the Ancestors and their Home 3 8.01.1.4 Modeling—The Problem of Taking Fragments of Evidence and Rebuilding the Childhood of the Planet 3 8.01.1.5 What Does a Planet Need to be Habitable? 4 8.01.1.6 The Power of Biology: The Infinite Improbability Drive 4 8.01.2 THE HADEAN (,4.56–4.0 Ga AGO) 5 8.01.2.1 Definition of Hadean 5 8.01.2.2 Building a Habitable Planet 5 8.01.2.3 The Hadean Record 7 8.01.2.4 When and Where Did Life Start? 7 8.01.3 THE ARCHEAN (,4–2.5 Ga AGO) 8 8.01.3.1 Definition of Archean 8 8.01.3.2 The Archean Record 8 8.01.3.2.1 Greenland 8 8.01.3.2.2 Barberton 9 8.01.3.2.3 Western Australia 9 8.01.3.2.4 Steep Rock, Ontario, and Pongola, South Africa 10 8.01.3.2.5 Belingwe 11 8.01.4 THE FUNCTIONING OF THE EARTH SYSTEM IN THE ARCHEAN 11 8.01.4.1 The Physical State of the Archean Planet 11 8.01.4.2 The Surface Environment 13 8.01.5 LIFE: EARLY SETTING AND IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT 14 8.01.5.1 Origin of Life 14 8.01.5.2 RNA World 15 8.01.5.3 The Last Common Ancestor 17 8.01.5.4 A Hyperthermophile Heritage? 19 8.01.5.5 Metabolic Strategies 21 8.01.6 THE EARLY BIOMES 21 8.01.6.1 Location of Early Biomes 21 8.01.6.2 Methanogenesis: Impact on the Environment 22 -
The Evolutionary Impact of Invasive Species
Colloquium The evolutionary impact of invasive species H. A. Mooney* and E. E. Cleland Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020 Since the Age of Exploration began, there has been a drastic and biotic environments that exist now are quite different from breaching of biogeographic barriers that previously had isolated those that have existed in recent geological times. the continental biotas for millions of years. We explore the International commerce has facilitated the movement of nature of these recent biotic exchanges and their consequences species; this is true globally and across taxonomic groups. on evolutionary processes. The direct evidence of evolutionary Ironically, this has increased species richness in many places consequences of the biotic rearrangements is of variable quality, where new species are introduced. The actual numbers of but the results of trajectories are becoming clear as the number individuals and species being transported across biogeographical of studies increases. There are examples of invasive species barriers every day is presumably enormous. However, only a altering the evolutionary pathway of native species by compet- small fraction of those transported species become established, itive exclusion, niche displacement, hybridization, introgression, and of these generally only about 1% become pests (5). Over predation, and ultimately extinction. Invaders themselves time however, these additions have become substantial. There evolve in response to their interactions with natives, as well as are now as many alien established plant species in New Zealand in response to the new abiotic environment. Flexibility in be- as there are native species. Many countries have 20% or more havior, and mutualistic interactions, can aid in the success of alien species in their floras (6). -
Wildlife (General) Regulations 2010
Wildlife (General) Regulations 2010 I, the Governor in and over the State of Tasmania and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Executive Council, make the following regulations under the Nature Conservation Act 2002. 22 November 2010 PETER G. UNDERWOOD Governor By His Excellency's Command, D. J. O'BYRNE Minister for Environment, Parks and Heritage PART 1 - Preliminary 1. Short title These regulations may be cited as the Wildlife (General) Regulations 2010. 2. Commencement These regulations take effect on 1 January 2011. 3. Interpretation (1) In these regulations, unless the contrary intention appears – Act means the Nature Conservation Act 2002; adult male deer means a male deer with branching antlers; antlerless deer means a deer that is – (a) without antlers; and (b) partly protected wildlife; approved means approved by the Secretary; Bass Strait islands means the islands in Bass Strait that are within the jurisdiction of the State; brow tine means the tine closest to a deer's brow; buy includes acquire for any consideration; cage includes any pen, aviary, enclosure or structure in which, or by means of which, wildlife is confined; certified forest practices plan means a certified forest practices plan within the meaning of the Forest Practices Act 1985; device, in relation to a seal deterrent permit, means a device that – (a) is designed to, or has the capability to, deter seals from entering or remaining in a particular area of water; and (b) involves the use of explosives, the discharge -
Pittwater Nature Issue 5 April 2021
1 Pittwater Nature Issue 5 April 2021 News and stories from Bushcarers, Wildlife carers, Community and home gardens Trad biocontrol in Ingleside Chase Reserve: Success! Trad biocontrol smut takes off. You’ll have read about our October 2020 smut releases in PNHA Newsletter 86. We’re excited to announce that Trad next to where we planted some infected stems along the track to the Irra- wong waterfall is looking yellow and sick. The spores of the smut, a type of fungus, have started spreading and in- fecting healthy Trad. We were advised to wait for up to a year for results, so to see Trad dying after only six months is wonderful. We receive boxes of infected stems from the CSIRO in Canberra. In February this year we planted stems amongst dense Trad along Narrabeen Creek at Warriewood. This April we planted in the Avalon reserves Toongari, Palmgrove Park and Plateau Park and in Crescent Reserve Newport. A few stems were also planted in the Avalon Community Garden. McCarrs Creek Reserve had been planted in October, but in April we planted more in other areas there. Click here: https://blog.csiro.au/smut-to-the-rescue/ to read about the CSIRO’s Wandering Trad biocontrol pro- gram. Left: Smut spores form on the lower surface of the leaf. Centre: Yellow dying cells from upper surface. Right: Infected area. Leaves will die, the plant will collapse, native vegetation can get light. Bush regenerators and gardeners, rejoice! Children: Ask us a question and we will try to answer. Here’s a trick question to ask someone: How many flowers are there in one daisy? Have you only given me one flower? Answer: I’ve actually given you a bunch of flowers because each daisy has lots of flowers (in the centre). -
Land Snails of the Eungella Plateau and Environs, Clarke Range, Mid-Eastern Queensland
LAND SNAILS OF THE EUNGELLA PLATEAU AND ENVIRONS, CLARKE RANGE, MID-EASTERN QUEENSLAND STANISIC, J.1 & WINDOW, E.2 This study documents the land snails recovered on the Eungella Biodiversity Survey. Thirty-three species belonging to 10 families are documented, representing the first attempt at analysing the altitudinal stratification of the Eungella land snail fauna. Three species were newly recorded and subsequently described from the survey, these being Eungellaropa crediton Holcroft 2018, Burwellia staceythomsonae Holcroft & Stanisic 2018, and Pereduropa burwelli Holcroft & Stanisic 2018. Fastosarion comerfordae Stanisic 2018 was also described from the survey material, having previ- ously been confused with the Mt Dryander Fastosarion superba (Cox, 1871). Species are discussed in relation to their current taxonomy, their local and more widespread distributions, and their habitat and microhabitat preferences. Shortcomings of the land snail survey are also briefly discussed. A bio- geographic overview of the Eungella rainforest land snails is presented. Keywords: elevational gradient, land snails, taxonomy, distributions 1 Biodiversity Program, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 2 School of Environmental & Natural Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia INTRODUCTION given the predilec tion of land snails for humid The Eungella Biodiversity Survey (EBS) of 2014– wet forests along the length of the continent’s eastern 2015 (Ashton et al., this volume) was the first con- seaboard, the Eungella region appears to offer a num- certed effort at surveying and documenting the land ber of prime habitats for a robust community of land snails of the Eungella plateau and environs. Previous snails. land snail collecting in the area by the Queensland Museum (QM) comprised only short-term visits METHODS that formed part of more wide-ranging expeditions. -
Identification and Functional Characterization of the First
www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Identifcation and functional characterization of the frst molluscan neuromedin U receptor in the slug, Deroceras reticulatum Seung‑Joon Ahn1,2, Rory J. Mc Donnell3, Jacob A. Corcoran1,4, Ruth C. Martin5 & Man‑Yeon Choi1* Neuromedin U (NmU) is a neuropeptide regulating diverse physiological processes. The insect homologs of vertebrate NmU are categorized as PRXamide family peptides due to their conserved C‑terminal end. However, NmU homologs have been elusive in Mollusca, the second largest phylum in the animal kingdom. Here we report the frst molluscan NmU/PRXamide receptor from the slug, Deroceras reticulatum. Two splicing variants of the receptor gene were functionally expressed and tested for binding with ten endogenous peptides from the slug and some insect PRXamide and vertebrate NmU peptides. Three heptapeptides (QPPLPRYa, QPPVPRYa and AVPRPRIa) triggered signifcant activation of the receptors, suggesting that they are true ligands for the NmU/PRXamide receptor in the slug. Synthetic peptides with structural modifcations at diferent amino acid positions provided important insights on the core moiety of the active peptides. One receptor variant always exhibited higher binding activity than the other variant. The NmU‑encoding genes were highly expressed in the slug brain, while the receptor gene was expressed at lower levels in general with relatively higher expression levels in both the brain and foot. Injection of the bioactive peptides into slugs triggered defensive behavior such as copious mucus secretion and a range of other anomalous behaviors including immobilization, suggesting their role in important physiological functions. Neuromedin U (NmU) is a neuropeptide, identifed initially from the porcine spinal cord1. -
New RNA Research Demonstrates Prebiotic Possibility
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Chemistry Faculty Publications Chemistry Department 1-2020 New RNA Research Demonstrates Prebiotic Possibility David W. Ball Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/scichem_facpub Part of the Chemistry Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Publisher's Statement Link to publisher version: https://skepticalinquirer.org/2020/01/new-rna-research-demonstrates- prebiotic-possibility/ Recommended Citation Ball, David W., "New RNA Research Demonstrates Prebiotic Possibility" (2020). Chemistry Faculty Publications. 522. https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/scichem_facpub/522 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Chemistry Department at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chemistry Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New RNA Research Demonstrates Prebiotic Possibility David W. Ball Creationists and other religious fundamentalists commonly (and erroneously) bring up the issue of abiogenesis as an argument against evolution, claiming that life is too complex to have arisen naturally from simple (non-living) chemicals. Abiogenesis is the development of chemical life from non-living chemicals, and is an active area of research for scientists studying the “Origin Of Life” question. The issue is largely irrelevant as an argument against evolution because evolution deals with what happens after life is formed. It is widely accepted that modern abiogenesis research traces back to the Miller-Urey experiment, performed by Stanley Miller at the University of Chicago (with assistance from Harold Urey) and published in 1953.