An Integrated Geophysical Analysis of Crustal Structure in the Wichita Uplift Region of Southern Oklahoma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Integrated Geophysical Analysis of Crustal Structure in the Wichita Uplift Region of Southern Oklahoma An integrated geophysical analysis of crustal structure in the Wichita Uplift region of southern Oklahoma Amanda (Rondot) Buckey Gulf of Mexico Exploration – Paleogene, Marathon Oil Company, 5555 San Felipe Street, Houston, Texas 77056. [email protected]. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION The Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (SOA) is a The Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (SOA) is a clas- northwest-trending failed arm of a Cambrian triple sic example of an aulacogen (failed rift), as interpreted by junction. Significant structures along the SOA include Shatski (1946) and Hoffman et al. (1974) and revisited by the Wichita Uplift and the Anadarko Basin in south- Keller and Stephenson (2007). The aulacogen trends to the west Oklahoma. The rift underwent a complex geologic northwest from the Cambrian rifted margin of Laurentia in history of bimodal volcanism, faulting, and subsidence northeast Texas, across southwestern Oklahoma, and possi- before Pennsylvanian compression inverted and uplift- bly into Colorado and Utah (Figure 1). Geologic evidence ed the structure as part of the formation of the Ances- for this feature is obscured in the southeast end by defor- tral Rocky Mountains. mation from the Ouachita orogeny (Keller et al., 1983) and This study employed data from a wide-aperture in the northwestern end by Laramide deformation (Larson seismic survey shot in 1985 across the Hardeman Basin, et al., 1985). Major structures associated with it include the Wichita Uplift, and the Anadarko Basin as a joint effort Wichita-Amarillo Uplift, Arbuckle Uplift, and Anadarko between the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP) and Basin, the deepest sedimentary basin in North America and the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). Using modern a prolific hydrocarbon-producing area (Gilbert, 1983). software and processing techniques, I picked numer- My study utilizes the data set from a 1985 wide aper- ous refracted and reflected phases and then performed ture reflection/ refraction seismic survey obtained across ray-tracing modeling of these picks to build a P-wave the Hollis-Hardeman Basin, the Wichita Uplift, and the seismic-velocity model of the upper crust underneath Anadarko Basin by the University of Texas at El Paso the Wichita Uplift. I integrated the seismic data with (UTEP) and the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). The gravity and magnetic data, well data, industry reflec- survey consisted of nine in-line shotpoints and eight off- tion data, and the results of previous studies to arrive line shotpoints, with several shots repeated using different at my final geologic model, which includes well-con- strained fault locations. This model shows that the granite and rhyolite se- quence present beneath the uplift is thicker and more continuous than previously modeled. Thick sequences of what may be metasediments are present adjacent to the Proterozoic basin at the southern end of the model. Dense mafic layers extending to a depth of 15 km form the core of the uplift, revealing the impressive scale of crustal modification in the rifting process. Figure 1. Location of the Southern Oklahoma Aulaco- Reprinted from the Oklahoma City Geological Society Shale Shaker, v. 62, p. gen. The approximate study area is indicated by the 432-452. black box. Modified from Keller and Stephenson (2007). 357 Buckey recorder deployments. The in-line shots have been ana- The SOA comprises one of the most extensive expo- lyzed by Zhu and McMechan (1989), Hamilton (1989), sures of igneous rocks within the mid-continent (McCo- Hsueh (1991), and Suleiman (1993) to construct two-di- nnell and Gilbert, 1990). Ham et al. (1964) described in mensional velocity models across the Wichita Uplift and detail the exposed igneous and metamorphic rocks around the Anadarko Basin. Chang et al. (1989) also generated a the Wichita Mountains. The geology of the SOA can be prestack depth-imaged model across the majority of the divided into three stages spanning ~1200 Ma: 1) pre-rift, 2) survey line using twelve of the inline shot gathers. active rifting from Middle Cambrian until Late Mississip- However, the off-line shots have not been studied in pian, and 3) post-rift deformation including Pennsylvanian detail until my study due to the absence of necessary soft- compression and Pennsylvanian-Permian strike-slip fault- ware. I was able to produce a new set of seismic record ing (Gilbert, 1983). sections and enhance these data with a variety of filters in The aulacogen formation likely initiated along a order to provide improved phase identifications. This ap- pre-existing structural weakness, possibly a Proterozoic proach produced considerably more identifiable phases northwest-trending arch across the Midcontinent (Gilbert, and picks for modeling than previous studies did. 1983) or a Precambrian fault bounding the Proterozoic ba- The goals of this study are: 1) to create a more detailed sin to the south (Brewer et al., 1983) through a Precambri- model of the upper crust of the Wichita Uplift and evaluate an granitic basement. The Tillman Metasedimentary Group its geologic interpretation, 2) to employ first- and later-ar- is the oldest unit assigned to the Wichita province. Early rival-time picks to perform ray tracing and inversion on the studies suggested that it was deposited on top of an eroded shot gathers, 3) and to produce an integrated model that granitic basement, marking the beginning of basin forma- will be constrained by previous models, well data, industry tion (Ham et al., 1964). This group may compose all or part reflection images, and gravity and magnetic data. of the sedimentary fill in the Proterozoic basin inferred to underlie the Hardeman Basin (Brewer et al., 1981). The Geologic Setting Tillman Metasedimentary Group is known only from the subsurface in an area south of the Wichita Mountains An aulacogen is a linear structural trough that extends (Ham et al., 1964). at a high angle from a continental margin or an orogenic Rifting began in the late Proterozoic-Early Cambrian belt into the continental platform (Hoffman et al., 1974). as the Proto-Atlantic Ocean opened (Gilbert and Hogan, The SOA displays many of the commonly recognized char- 1995). The rise of tholeiitic basaltic magma is assumed to acteristics of such features, including an early history as a indicate the commencement of rifting, forming the Rag- large graben, the occurrence of bimodal rhyolitic and ba- gedy Mountain Gabbro Group and the Navajoe Moun- saltic rocks, and later reactivation and structural inversion tain Basalt-Spilite Group. The Raggedy Mountain Gab- (Burke, 1977). bro Group consists of two intrusive formations, the Glen Hoffman et al. (1974) and Burke and Dewey (1973) pre- Mountain Layered Complex (GMLC) and the Roosevelt sented a hypothesis for the origin and development of au- Gabbros. The Navajoe Mountain Basalt-Spilite Group is lacogens within a plate tectonics context. A mantle plume the extrusive equivalent of the GMLC, having been depos- beneath a continent causes a domal uplift to form, which ited as shallow submarine flows on top of Tillman gray- breaks apart into a three-armed rift system. Two of the rift wackes (Ham et al. 1964). arms continue to separate to form an ocean basin, while the The Roosevelt Gabbros form a series of smaller, inter- third arm is abandoned. The “failed” arm will maintain a nally differentiated plutons that intrude the GMLC (Mc- graben form and be injected with volcanics while the man- Connell and Gilbert, 1990. Subsequent to or concurrent tle upwelling continues. Once upwelling diminishes and with Roosevelt Gabbro emplacement, uplift and erosion ceases, the domal uplift sinks into a broad downwarp due removed 2-4 km of the Raggedy Mountain Gabbro Group to thermal contraction of the crust, and the graben collapses and an unknown amount of sedimentary overburden (Pow- inward. The normal faults become high-angle reverse faults, ell and Phelps, 1977). and the crust of the central block is thickened. Rift zones Carlton Rhyolite extruded onto the erosional surface form regions of weakness which are prone to later struc- above the gabbros while its intrusive equivalent, the Wich- tural reactivation (Burke and Dewey, 1973). Hoffman et al. ita Mountain Granite, crystallized at shallow depths. The (1974) also observed that aulacogens may control sedimen- Carlton Rhyolite is composed of a series of rhyolitic flows tation patterns after the aulacogen itself is no longer active. with interbedded water-laid tuff, agglomerate, and welded 358 Oklahoma Geological Survey Guidebook 38 Geophysical analysis of crustal structure in Wichita region tuffs (Ham et al., 1964). Its distribution trends northwest, faults. The Anadarko Basin continued subsiding after uplift paralleling the strike of the inferred bounding faults of the of the igneous block ceased as material eroded from the rift zone (Gilbert, 1983). The lavas likely erupted out of uplifted block was deposited into the Anadarko Basin, cre- linear fissures within a half-graben setting with subsidence ating over 12 km of structural relief between the uplift and to the north, as the rhyolite is over 1400 m thick north of the basin (Gilbert, 1983). the Wichita Mountains but absent to the south (McConnell The SOA composes one of the major elements of the and Gilbert, 1990). Within the central Wichita block, the Ancestral Rocky Mountains, a series of fault-bounded Wichita Mountain Granite formed plutons and sills inject- basement uplifts and flanking basins formed in the Late ed between the Raggedy Mountain Gabbro Group and the Mississippian to Permian that stretches from Oklahoma to Carlton Rhyolite (Ham et al., 1964). Utah (Kluth and Coney, 1981). The driving stresses of this Finally, a series of late diabase plugs and dikes cut all intracratonic deformation are under debate. other igneous units. However, the intrusions do not cut An understanding of the deformation characteristic of across the overlying unconformity into the Upper Cambrian the SOA may provide insights on the formation of the An- sediments, constraining the end of igneous activity within cestral Rocky Mountains.
Recommended publications
  • Tectonic Features of the Precambrian Belt Basin and Their Influence on Post-Belt Structures
    ... Tectonic Features of the .., Precambrian Belt Basin and Their Influence on Post-Belt Structures GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 866 · Tectonic Features of the · Precambrian Belt Basin and Their Influence on Post-Belt Structures By JACK E. HARRISON, ALLAN B. GRIGGS, and JOHN D. WELLS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER X66 U N IT ED STATES G 0 V ERN M EN T P R I NT I N G 0 F F I C E, \VAS H I N G T 0 N 19 7 4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-600111 ) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. GO\·ernment Printing Office 'Vashington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cO\·er) Stock Number 2401-02554 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract................................................. 1 Phanerozoic events-Continued Introduction . 1 Late Mesozoic through early Tertiary-Continued Genesis and filling of the Belt basin . 1 Idaho batholith ................................. 7 Is the Belt basin an aulacogen? . 5 Boulder batholith ............................... 8 Precambrian Z events . 5 Northern Montana disturbed belt ................. 8 Phanerozoic events . 5 Tectonics along the Lewis and Clark line .............. 9 Paleozoic through early Mesozoic . 6 Late Cenozoic block faults ........................... 13 Late Mesozoic through early Tertiary . 6 Conclusions ............................................. 13 Kootenay arc and mobile belt . 6 References cited ......................................... 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURES 1-4. Maps: 1. Principal basins of sedimentation along the U.S.-Canadian Cordillera during Precambrian Y time (1,600-800 m.y. ago) ............................................................................................... 2 2. Principal tectonic elements of the Belt basin reentrant as inferred from the sedimentation record ............
    [Show full text]
  • Rift-Valley-1.Pdf
    R E S O U R C E L I B R A R Y E N C Y C L O P E D I C E N T RY Rift Valley A rift valley is a lowland region that forms where Earth’s tectonic plates move apart, or rift. G R A D E S 6 - 12+ S U B J E C T S Earth Science, Geology, Geography, Physical Geography C O N T E N T S 9 Images For the complete encyclopedic entry with media resources, visit: http://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/rift-valley/ A rift valley is a lowland region that forms where Earth’s tectonic plates move apart, or rift. Rift valleys are found both on land and at the bottom of the ocean, where they are created by the process of seafloor spreading. Rift valleys differ from river valleys and glacial valleys in that they are created by tectonic activity and not the process of erosion. Tectonic plates are huge, rocky slabs of Earth's lithosphere—its crust and upper mantle. Tectonic plates are constantly in motion—shifting against each other in fault zones, falling beneath one another in a process called subduction, crashing against one another at convergent plate boundaries, and tearing apart from each other at divergent plate boundaries. Many rift valleys are part of “triple junctions,” a type of divergent boundary where three tectonic plates meet at about 120° angles. Two arms of the triple junction can split to form an entire ocean. The third, “failed rift” or aulacogen, may become a rift valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Geosciences 528 Sedimentary Basin Analysis
    Geosciences 528 Sedimentary Basin Analysis Spring, 2011 G528 – Sedimentary Basins • Prof. M.S. Hendrix – Office SC359 – Office Phone: 243-5278 – Cell Phone: 544-0780 – [email protected] • Textbook = Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis - Andrew Miall • Lab 320 • Syllabus Introduction to sedimentary basin analysis What is a sedimentary basin? • thick accumulation (>2-3 km) of sediment • physical setting allowing for sed accumulation e.g. Mississippi Delta up to 18 km of sediment accumulated • significant element of vertical tectonics which cause formation of sed basins, uplift of sed source areas, and reorganization of sediment dispersal systems • Study of history of sedimentary basins and processes that influence nature of basin fill Vertical tectonics caused primarily by: • plate tectonic setting and proximity of basin to plate margin • type of nearest plate boundary(s • nature of basement rock • nature of sedimentary rock Requires working or expert knowledge on wide variety of geologic subdisciplines • sedimentology (basis of interpretation of depositional systems • depositional systems analysis • paleocurrent analysis • provenance analysis • floral/ faunal analysis • geochronology • crustal scale tectonic processes, geophysical methods • thermochronology (Ar/Ar, apatite F-T, etc.) • special techniques - organic geochemical analysis - paleosol analysis - tree ring analysis • involves both surface and subsurface data • involves large changes in scale and may involve long temporal histories Location/ exposure quality Stratigraphic measurements, sedimentology, paleoflow data Clast Composition Analysis Paleogeographic/ paleoenvironmental interpretation Regional tectonic picture Basin models: 1) a norm, for purposes of comparison 2) a framework and guide for future observation 3) a predictor 4) an integrated basis for interpretation of the class of basins it represents Francis Bacon: ‘Truth emerges more readily from error than from confusion.’ S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotouristic Attractions of the Danakil Depression Katarzyna Cieśluk1, Mirosław T
    Geotourism 1(36) 2014: 33–42 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/geotour.2014.36.33 Geotouristic attractions of the Danakil Depression Katarzyna Cieśluk1, Mirosław T. Karasiewicz1*, Zdzisław Preisner2 1 Nicolaus Copernicus University, Faculty of Earth Sciences, ul. Lwowska 1, 87–100 Toruń; *e-mail: [email protected] 2Toruń School of Banking, ul. Młodzieżowa 31a, 87–100 Toruń Introduction The Danakil Valley occurs in The Afar Triangle, within The Great Rift Valley, on north-east Ethiopian, south-east Eritrean and west Djiboutian territories. It is an enormous unsettled area with barren soil. From the North to the South it is about 570 km long, and its width varies from 80 to 400 km (covering an area~200000 km2 – Beyene, Abdel- salam, 2005). Most of it lies below sea level. It also has the deepest depression of the African continent, the shoreline of lake Asal reaching 155 m b.s.l. (Waltham, 2010, but Mo- rell, 2012–156 m b.s.l.). Its geological, climatic, cultural Abstract: Geotourists and unconventional tourists will be definite- and landscape features are unique on a global scale. Hot ly interested in the Danakil Valley. It is rarely visited place but ab- sulphur springs, multicolour salt and mineral crusts, rifts, solutely extraordinary in many ways. It is in an area of divergence faults, black lavas, vaporous geysers and active volcanos of lithosphere plates and, therefore connected to that, seismic and create one of the most weird and beautiful landscapes volcanic activity can be observed. Stunning terrain forms, geo- on Earth. logical structures, colours and diversity seem to be unreal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen: It’S a Classic
    The Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen: It’s a classic G. Randy Keller Oklahoma Geological Survey, Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy, The University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd St, Rm. N-131, Norman, Oklahoma 73019. [email protected]. ph. (405) 325-7968. INTRODUCTION Connell, 1989; Granath, 1989). In some places, oblique slip involves approximately equal amounts of strike-slip and Southern Oklahoma has long been recognized as the dip-slip movement (Granath, 1989). Thomas (this guide- home to a series of very large and complex intraplate book) also stresses the importance of strike-slip in the in structures that are exposed in the Wichita and Arbuckle the initial Cambrian phase of tectonism. Mountains. These features are the result of early Paleo- However, the SOA is widely viewed as a classic ex- zoic extension and late Paleozoic compression. Strike-slip ample of an aulacogen and consists of a linear alignment movements probably played a role both phases of deforma- of structures that have been extensively inverted and that tion. Today, the resulting features are together referred to begins at the rifted margin of Laurentia (ancient core of as the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (SOA). This classic North America) in northeast Texas and extends north- feature was recognized as a major intraplate structure by the westward at least to southern Colorado (Fig.1). The main famous Russian geologist Nikolay S. Shatsky (also spelled structures commonly associated with the SOA are the Am- Nicholas Shatski). The Shatsky Rise in the north Pacific arillo-Wichita Uplift and the Anadarko Basin. Because of was named after him, and he was awarded the Lenin Prize extensive petroleum exploration, the late Paleozoic histo- in 1958 for his compilation of the first tectonic map of Rus- ry of this part of the SOA is well known and summarized sia.
    [Show full text]
  • Elling Et Al: Three Failed Rifts V5 6/7/21 1
    Elling et al: Three Failed Rifts v5 6/7/21 1 1 Three Major Failed Rifts in Central North America: Similarities and Differences 2 3 Reece Elling1, Seth Stein1, Carol A. Stein2, Kerri Gefeke2 4 5 1Earth & Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208 6 2Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607 7 8 Abstract 9 The North American craton preserves over a billion years of geologic history, including 10 three major rifts that failed rather than evolving to continental breakup and seafloor spreading. 11 The Midcontinent Rift (MCR) and Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (SOA) show prominent gravity 12 anomalies due to large volumes of igneous rift-filling rock. The Reelfoot Rift (RR), though obscure 13 in gravity data, is of interest due to its seismicity. The ~1.1 Ga MCR records aspects of the 14 assembly of Rodinia, whereas the ~560 Ma SOA and RR formed during the later breakup of 15 Rodinia and subsequent assembly of Pangea. Comparative study of these rifts using geophysical 16 and geological data shows intriguing similarities and differences. The rifts formed in similar 17 tectonic settings and followed similar evolutionary paths of extension, magmatism, subsidence, 18 and inversion by later compression, leading to similar width and architecture. Differences between 19 rifts reflect the eXtent to which these processes occurred. Further study of failed rifts would give 20 additional insight into the final stages of continental rifting and early stages of seafloor spreading. 21 22 Introduction 23 Plate tectonics shapes the evolution of the continents and oceans via the Wilson cycle, in 24 which continents rift to form new oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Inheritance at a Continental Margin William A
    2005 GSA PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Tectonic inheritance at a continental margin William A. Thomas, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0053, USA, [email protected] INTRODUCTION The Grenville front, at the leading edge The pre-Rodinia (pre-Grenville) conti- Forty years ago, the eastern margin of the province, is mapped through gener- nental margin is unknown; however, the of North America inspired Tuzo Wilson ally broad curves along the outcrop in dextral bend of the Grenville front beneath (1966) to ask, “Did the Atlantic close and Canada and southward with decreasing the Gulf Coastal Plain suggests possible then re-open?” The Wilson cycle of clos- resolution in the subsurface, using drill inheritance from a dextral offset in the ing and opening of ocean basins incor- and geophysical data, approximately to older continental margin. Northwest-strik- porates the cyclic assembly and breakup central Tennessee; subsurface data define ing dikes (ca. 1350 Ma) in Oklahoma of supercontinents. Alternate processes of a separate segment in Texas (Figs. 1 and (Denison, 1982) parallel the trend of the extension and compression of continental 2). No data presently are available to locate dextral bend of the Grenville front and margins suggest an important potential for the Grenville front precisely beneath a suggest the possible orientation of the off- tectonic inheritance and overprinting. thick sedimentary cover in the Mississippi set of the older rifted continental margin Now, we recognize a succession of Embayment of the Mesozoic-Cenozoic (Fig. 2). Few other hints are available to two complete Wilson cycles in eastern Gulf Coastal Plain; however, the trace must suggest the trace of the pre-Rodinia rifted North America: closing of an ocean and accommodate a substantial dextral bend margin of cratonic proto-Laurentia.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 SEDIMENTARY BASINS
    Chapter 11 SEDIMENTARY BASINS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The official definition of a sedimentary basin is: a low area in the Earth’s crust, of tectonic origin, in which sediments accumulate. Sedimentary basins range in size from as small as hundreds of meters to large parts of ocean basins. The essential element of the concept is tectonic creation of relief, to provide both a source of sediment and a relatively low place for the deposition of that sediment. 1.2 Keep in mind that a sedimentary basin doesn’t have to be a place on the Earth’s surface with strictly basinal shape, with closed contours, like a washbowl: great masses of sediment can be deposited on a surface with a gentle and uniform slope. But implicit in the concept of a sedimentary basin is the existence of prolonged crustal subsidence, to make a place for a thick deposit of sediment that might well have been deposited in an area without basinal geometry at the surface. Tectonics is needed to make sedimentary basins, but the record of the basin itself is sedimentary. 1.3 As with most blanket statements, the one above has exceptions to it. A sedimentary basin can be made just by erecting high land in an adjacent area by volcanism. 1.4 The term “sedimentary basin” is usually not applied to relatively thin and very extensive deposits of sandstone, limestone, and shale from epicontinental seas on the cratons, many of which have seen no deformation through billions of years, but only to relatively thick deposits in tectonically active areas with negative relief.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Inheritance at a Continental Margin, William A
    2005 GSA PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS VOL. 16, No. 2 A PUBLICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA FEBRUARY 2006 TTectonicectonic iinheritancenheritance aatt a continentalcontinental marginmargin Inside: 2005 GSA Presidential Address: Tectonic inheritance at a continental margin, William A. Thomas, p. 4 2005 Medals, Awards, Honorary Fellows, and Division Awards, p. 15 Section Meetings Rocky Mountain, p. 18 VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2 FEBRUARY 2006 Cover: Map showing the record of tectonic inheritance through two complete Wilson cycles in eastern North America. See the GSA TODAY publishes news and information for more than 2005 GSA Presidential Address, “Tectonic 20,000 GSA members and subscribing libraries. GSA Today inheritance at a continental margin,” by lead science articles should present the results of exciting new William A. Thomas, p. 4–11. research or summarize and synthesize important problems or issues, and they must be understandable to all in the earth science community. Submit manuscripts to science editors Keith A. Howard, [email protected], or Gerald M. Ross, lavaboy@ verizon.net. GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) is published 11 times per year, monthly, with a combined April/May issue, by The Geological Society of America, Inc., with offices at 3300 Penrose Place, Boulder, Colorado. Mailing address: P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, USA. Periodicals postage paid at Boulder, Colorado, and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: SCIENCE ARTICLE Send address changes to GSA Today, GSA Sales and Service, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140. 4 Presidential Address, William A. Thomas Copyright © 2006, The Geological Society of America, Inc. (GSA). All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Systems
    69 EXTENSION SYSTEMS Extension systems are zones where plates split into two or more smaller blocks that move apart. To accommodate the separation, dominantly normal faults and even open fissures lead to stretching, rupture and lengthening of crustal rocks. At the same time, the lithosphere is thinned and the asthenosphere is upwelling below the necked lithosphere. Decompression during upwelling of the mantle results in partial melting. The produced basaltic magma is injected into the fissures or extruded as fissure eruptions along and on either side of the splitting linear region (graben and rifts). This mechanism, coeval lithospheric stretching and accretion of buoyant magma, is called rifting. It is called seafloor spreading once a rifted region becomes a plate boundary that creates new oceanic lithosphere as plates diverge from one another. The spreading centres shape elevated morphological forms, the mid-oceanic ridges, because magma and young, thin oceanic lithosphere are buoyant. Divergent plate boundaries are some of the most active volcanic zones on the Earth. Seafloor spreading is so important that it has created more than half of the Earth’s surface during the past 200 Ma. Since the new continents drift away from the locus of extension, they escape further deformation and marine sedimentation seals relict structures of the early rift on either side of the new ocean. These two sides are passive continental margins. The dominant stress field is extension. Bulk lithospheric rheologies control the development of large- scale extensional
    [Show full text]
  • D9 Rift Valleys and Triple Junctions
    PLATE TECTONICS 205 d9 Rift valleys and triple junctions < aulacogen; East Africa, Red Sea, Gulf of Aden; Jibuti (Djibouti) > Geology without fractures would be rather dull, and what would the geologist do if he were without faults when his imagination exceeds his geology? —Cloos.1 Rifts result from tensional stress. Lithosphere (plate) rifting can result from:2 1) horizontal stretching (plate-pull). 2) under-dragging by divergent asthenosphere flow. 3) uparching (over a thickening asthenosphere). 4) outward-directed gravitational collapse of [No figure] raised, laterally unsupported, lithosphere. Land-traversing divergent plate boundaries are the Central Rift valley in Iceland and the Great Rift Valley of Africa. However, because divergent plate boundaries most often are where new deep-ocean floor opens they occur mostly within oceanic areas. There they are identifiable as “mid-ocean ridge” segments that have been made known by seafloor topographic-mapping (and which are not necessarily in the mid-ocean). Divergent plate boundaries within oceanic areas are identified as the crest of wide oceanic rise-ridge mountain systems with innumerable abyssal hills, the crests of which, for long distances, parallel the ridge axis. A pronounced rift valley at the ridge (axial-valley) is the most characteristic topographic feature of the boundary between divergent lithospheric plates that are separating at slow (less than 3 cm per year) to intermediate rates (some 6 cm per year). Abyssal hills on the rises of fast (to as much as twice the intermediate
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Oklahoma Transform-Parallel Intracratonic Fault System
    The Southern Oklahoma transform-parallel intracratonic fault system William A. Thomas Geological Survey of Alabama, 420 Hackberry Lane, P.O. Box 869999, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35486-6999. [email protected]. ph. (205) 247-3547. ABSTRACT extends >500 km into the North American craton from a cratonward-convex bend (the Ouachita salient) of the late The “Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen” is recognized Paleozoic Appalachian-Ouachita orogen and from a corre- as a linear zone of igneous rocks with ages of ~539 to 530 sponding oceanward-concave angular bend (the Ouachita Ma, extending into the Laurentian continent from the embayment) in the late Neoproterozoic–Cambrian Iapetan large-scale Ouachita embayment in the Iapetan rifted rifted margin of Laurentia (Fig. 1). Although early interpre- continental margin, as well as from a large-scale salient tations generally linked the Southern Oklahoma fault system in the late Paleozoic Ouachita thrust belt. The well-doc- to the Appalachian-Ouachita orogen, specific genetic rela- umented Cambrian igneous rocks are associated with tionships were not clear (e.g., King, 1959). More unifying in- less well defined, contemporaneous basement faults that terpretations emerged with the advent of the concept of plate were overprinted by larger magnitude late Paleozoic tectonics, and two distinctly different scenarios evolved: (1) basement faults along the Arbuckle and Wichita base- that the Southern Oklahoma fault system is a transform-par- ment uplifts. Two distinctly different tectonic interpre- allel intracratonic fault
    [Show full text]