DOCSLIB.ORG

Sullivan Square Disposition Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sullivan Square Disposition Study Sullivan Square Disposition Study December 2013 BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT CITY OF BOSTON AUTHORITY Thomas M. Menino Peter Meade, Director Mayor The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding under an award with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and find- ings of the work are dedicated to the public. The Boston Redevelopment Authority is solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publica- tion. Such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. We also thank the Metro Boston Consortium for Sustainable Communities for making this work possible. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Boston Redevelopment Authority Board of Directors Boston Public Works Department Allentza Michel, Community Liaison Paul D. Foster, Vice-Chairman Joanne Massaro, Commissioner Eric Halvorsen, Assistant Director of Transportation Consuelo Gonzales-Thornell, Treasurer Para Jayasinghe, Chief Engineer The Consultant Team Timothy J. Burke, Member William Egan, Supervising Structural Engineer Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge: Urban Design & Michael P. Monahan, Member Planning Office of Councilor Salvatore LaMattina Skip Smallridge Boston Redevelopment Authority Salvatore LaMattina, Boston City Councilor Carole Schlessinger Peter Meade, Director Judy Evers, Liaison Maren Lane James Tierney, Chief of Staff Kristie Norris Office of Representative Michael E. Capuano Kairos Shen, Chief Planner / Director of Planning Ben Winter Michael E. Capuano, Representative in Congress Haipung Zhu Prataap Patrose, Deputy Director for Urban Design Danny Ryan, District Representative Lara Mérida, Deputy Directory for Community Planning Byrne McKinney & Associates, Inc.: Market & Financial Jim Fitzgerald, Senior Manager, Transportation & Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Analysis Infrastructure Projects Mark Boyle, Director of Real Estate Pam McKinney Jeong-Jun Ju, Urban Designer II Carlos Montañez, Senior Planner II Transit Realty Associates Howard/Stein-Hudson: Transportation Planning Cecilia Nardi, Assistant to the Chief Planner Phil Jean, Senior Project Manager Jane Howard Ted Schwartzberg, Planner II, Project Manager Keri Pyke Mayor’s Office of Neighborhood Services Mike Santos Boston Transportation Department Danielle Fitzgerald, Charlestown Neighborhood Special Thanks To: Thomas J. Tinlin, Commissioner Liaison The Flatley Company for the generous provision of Vineet Gupta, Director of Planning meeting space William Conroy IV, Senior Transportation Planner Metropolitan Area Planning Council Members of the Public for their dedication and active Marc Draisen, Executive Director participation Boston Parks and Recreation Department Joel Barrera, Deputy Director Antonia M. Pollak, Commissioner Eric Bourassa, Director of Transportation Division Aldo Ghirin, Senior Planner Christopher Kuschel, Regional Planner Carrie Marsh, Executive Secretary iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY sentiments remarkably similar to those noted in the Purpose Key Design and Land Use Concepts Transportation Study. The Study asks its readers to The Sullivan Square Disposition Study establishes “Imagine a Sullivan Square with its sense of place – its Building upon the armature of BTD’s roadway design, a framework and community vision for the future of historic role as the central public space of the com- this Study seeks to further the goal of earlier transpor- seven publically-owned parcels at the heart of Sullivan munity – restored. Imagine a Sullivan Square [where] tation plans to create a walkable, mixed-use Sullivan Square, Charlestown. As a companion to the Boston pedestrians, transit riders and vehicles can co-exist Square. To this end, a series of key concepts outlining Transportation Department’s (BTD) Rutherford Avenue safely and comfortably.” appropriate uses and building scale were developed Roadway Plan, the Sullivan Square Disposition Study in the public process. Building on these efforts, in 2008 the BTD began the puts forth key land-use planning principles to guide Rutherford Avenue / Sullivan Square Design Project to These key concepts include: the upcoming revitalization of Sullivan Square. Tran- create preliminary roadway designs for the Rutherford sitioning from an intersection to drive through, back • Creating a pedestrian-friendly neighborhood Avenue Corridor and Sullivan Square. Through an in- to its rightful place in the urban fabric of Charlestown, that dramatically improves access from the exist- tensive four year community-based planning process, Sullivan Square is primed for its reestablishment as ing neighborhood to the Sullivan Square MBTA roadway plans for Sullivan Square were developed, a vital and walkable, transit-anchored mixed-use station. with a focus on enhancing the pedestrian environ- neighborhood. While currently dominated by ve- • Facilitating mixed-use transit-oriented develop- ment with safe crossings and better access to parks hicular transportation infrastructure, Sullivan Square ment throughout the study area, emphasizing and transit. is primed to rejoin the Charlestown urban fabric as a pedestrian-oriented uses on the ground floor vital, mixed-use neighborhood center. Dovetailing the completion of BTD’s roadway design along the walking route to the train station. process, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) • Varying building heights across the area, with partnered with the Metropolitan Area Planning Coun- lower buildings located closer to the Schrafft’s Process cil (MAPC) and a consultant team led by the firm of Building and increasing heights toward the train Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge to undertake the In 1997 BTD sought to leverage Central Artery/Tunnel station, using buildings located near the I-93 via- Sullivan Square Disposition Study. Supported, in part, Project improvements to the regional road network duct to block the noise and air quality impacts of through a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban De- by adapting local roads to better serve their adja- the highway. velopment Sustainable Communities Regional Plan- cent neighborhoods. A community planning process • Maintaining sightlines to the Schrafft’s Build- ning Grant, members of the community collaborated was undertaken, leading to the publication of the ing while allowing for construction of an iconic with the authors in eight public meetings to develop Rutherford Avenue Corridor Transportation Study in building on the MBTA station property that the guidelines of this Study. 1999. Nearly fifteen years later, we see community provides for an improved and well-defined pe- destrian entrance into the station. iv • Accommodating current and future bus opera- tions in development schemes for the Sullivan Square MBTA station area. • Creating a series of smaller, linked open spaces that are complemented by a larger central open space on Parcel 4, to be activated by the L-shaped building also located on that block. Implementation and Economic Analysis Final design, funding and reconstruction of the Sul- livan Square roadway system is expected to be a multi-year process. The economic analysis conducted in this Study is intended to provide an initial overview of market conditions for disposal and development of the parcels in the study area. Initial findings indicate that if it were built today, the Clockwise from top left: Existing aerial view of Sullivan Square from the south (photo by Don Kindsvatter); plan neighborhood model shown would face significant of new roadway system identifying Parcels 1 through 7 studied in this report; aerial overview of the conceptual vision for the District. economic obstacles. However, in light of evolving conditions between now and the time of land dispos- al, it will be the task of future public review processes to refine both the economic model and the neighbor- hood physical model, taking into account conditions in place at that time. v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 4. Implementation 35 Study Purpose 2 Financial Analysis 35 Process 4 Constructability 40 2. Background & Existing Conditions 7 Phasing 41 History 7 Next Steps 43 Land Use 8 Urban Design Characteristics 9 3. The Future 11 Public Realm 12 Land Use 16 Building Scale 17 Illustrative Plan 17 Parking 28 Other Design Guidelines 30 Public Health 34 Sustainability 34 vi 1. INTRODUCTION The City of Boston Transportation Department (BTD) recently completed a two-year transporta- tion planning process to develop a conceptual plan for reconfiguring Rutherford Avenue and Sullivan Square in Charlestown. This conceptual plan seeks to transform the roadway into an urban boulevard and create walkable, gridded city blocks adjacent to the Sullivan Square MBTA Station. As a follow-up to Sulllivan Station the BTD planning process, the Boston Redevelop- ment Authority and the Metropolitan Area Planning Council conducted this public process to develop a land use vision for the newly created parcels and help prepare for their eventual disposition. The Study Area is comprised of the blocks and parcels adjacent to Sullivan Square Station that will be created by the new roadway configuration. Aerial view of Sullivan Square today, facing northeast to the Mystic River (photo by Don Kindsvatter). The Study Area for the parcel level development plan that have strong connections to the rest of the neigh- The Project Area is not only a portal for the Orange focuses primarily on the publicly-owned parcels clus- borhood and neighboring Somerville. Line rideshed to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
    y NOTE WONOERLAND 7 THERE HOLDERS Of PREPAID PASSES. ON DECEMBER , 1977 WERE 22,404 2903 THIS AMOUNTS TO AN ESTIMATED (44 ,608 ) PASSENGERS PER DAY, NOT INCLUDED IN TOTALS BELOW REVERE BEACH I OAK 8R0VC 1266 1316 MALOEN CENTER BEACHMONT 2549 1569 SUFFOLK DOWNS 1142 ORIENT< NTS 3450 WELLINGTON 5122 WOOO ISLANC PARK 1071 AIRPORT SULLIVAN SQUARE 1397 6668 I MAVERICK LCOMMUNITY college 5062 LECHMERE| 2049 5645 L.NORTH STATION 22,205 6690 HARVARD HAYMARKET 6925 BOWDOIN , AQUARIUM 5288 1896 I 123 KENDALL GOV CTR 1 8882 CENTRAL™ CHARLES^ STATE 12503 9170 4828 park 2 2 766 i WASHINGTON 24629 BOYLSTON SOUTH STATION UNDER 4 559 (ESSEX 8869 ARLINGTON 5034 10339 "COPLEY BOSTON COLLEGE KENMORE 12102 6102 12933 WATER TOWN BEACON ST. 9225' BROADWAY HIGHLAND AUDITORIUM [PRUDENTIAL BRANCH I5I3C 1868 (DOVER 4169 6063 2976 SYMPHONY NORTHEASTERN 1211 HUNTINGTON AVE. 13000 'NORTHAMPTON 3830 duole . 'STREET (ANDREW 6267 3809 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY ricumt inoicati COLUMBIA APFKOIIUATC 4986 ONE WAY TRAFFIC 40KITT10 AT RAPID TRANSIT LINES STATIONS (EGLESTON SAVIN HILL 15 98 AMD AT 3610 SUBWAY ENTRANCES DECEMBER 7,1977 [GREEN 1657 FIELDS CORNER 4032 SHAWMUT 1448 FOREST HILLS ASHMONT NORTH OUINCY I I I 99 8948 3930 WOLLASTON 2761 7935 QUINCY CENTER M b 6433 It ANNUAL REPORT Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/annualreportmass1978mass BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1978 ROBERT R. KILEY Chairman and Chief Executive Officer RICHARD D. BUCK GUIDO R. PERERA, JR. "V CLAIRE R. BARRETT THEODORE C. LANDSMARK NEW MEMBERS OF THE BOARD — 1979 ROBERT L. FOSTER PAUL E. MEANS Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 20, 1979 - January 29.
    [Show full text]
  • East Somerville: New Insights Into Its Rich Architecture and Historical Figures
    East Somerville: New Insights into its Rich Architecture and Historical Figures Led by Edward Gordon, President, New England Chapter of the Victorian Society in America Sunday, May 19, 2013 Starting from the main entrance to the Sullivan Square MBTA Orange Line station this tour will first highlight the western-most section of Charlestown and then some of the architectural treasures of East Somerville. The route is designed to showcase residences built between Somerville’s incorporation as a town separate from Charlestown in 1842 and the economic depression known as the Panic of 1873. These early houses are located primarily along or near Perkins Street, a thoroughfare that extends westward from Brighton Street in Charlestown to Franklin Street in Somerville. The houses represent design modes popular in the early-to-mid Victorian era (1837-1901) and include more or less intact examples of the Greek Revival, Italianate and Mansard styles. By the end of the tour we hope you will be able to identify these styles on your own. The last third of the route will look at a few of the more substantial masonry commercial buildings on Broadway— the gateway to East Somerville. Most of these commercial buildings were built between the time that the electric trolley was introduced to Somerville in the 1890s until 1930, when the Great Depression began to take its toll on the nation’s economy. 1859 The tour begins in Charlestown, which could be considered the “mother town” of Somerville. The reason East Somerville developed with a residential core, and industry and commerce at its periphery, is due to transportation improvements and real estate developments occurring nearby in the Sullivan Square section of western Charlestown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter of the Cambridge Council On
    Newslines The Newsletter of the Cambridge Council on Aging 806 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 Office: (617) 349-6220 Senior Center: (617) 349-6060 North Cambridge Senior Center (617) 349-6320 January 2012 www.cambridgema.gov/DHSP2 2012 Mall Destinations pg 2 806 Happenings pg 3 Calendars centerfold Save the Date: Thursday January 12 Over the Counter Medications 1:00-2:00 p.m. Citywide Senior Center North Cambridge Senior Center Closed Monday, January 2, 2012 Happy New Year From the Cambridge Council on Aging, Citywide and North Cambridge Senior Centers Here's to health and happiness! **************************** A toast to the New Year! Weather Forecast Peace and joy to all of us! Prosperity and cheer! When Cambridge Public Schools Years come and go, some bad, some good. are closed due to snow conditions, New years provide the space, the Cambridge Senior Centers are Each to fill with what one would, open for meals and drop-in only. Classes are cancelled and our Senior Windows onto grace. Shuttle bus does not operate. Years come and go, yet still we toast Each one, for each one seems If you have questions on a snowy As though it were a new-found coast, day about our hours of operation or Rich with hope and dreams. classes, call 617-349-6060 to find out more information. (by Nicholas Gordon) Mall Destinations 2012 January 2012 Arsenal/ Watertown Malls February 2012 Cambridgeside Galleria March 2012 Assembly Square Mall April 2012 Meadow Glen Mall May 2012 Arsenal/ Watertown Malls June 2012 Cambridgeside Galleria July 2012 Assembly Square Mall August 2012 Meadow Glen Mall September 2012 Arsenal/ Watertown Malls October 2012 Cambridgeside Galleria November 2012 Assembly Square Mall December 2012 Meadow Glen Mall Listed below is a brief description of what stores are at the individual malls.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115
    HARVARD university Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115 Submitted Pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning Code Harvard Enterprise Research Campus SubmiƩ ed to: Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a the Boston Planning & Development Agency SubmiƩ ed by: Harvard University With Technical Assistance From: DLA Piper Reed Hilderbrand VHB WSP ALLSTON CAMPUS December 2017 Master Plan for Planned Development Area No. 115 Submitted Pursuant to Article 80 of the Boston Zoning Code Harvard Enterprise Research Campus Submitted to: Boston Redevelopment Authority d/b/a the Boston Planning and Development Agency Submitted by: Harvard University With Technical Assistance From: DLA Piper Reed Hilderbrand VHB WSP December 2017 Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Relationship to Framework Plan .................................................................................................... 2 3.0 PDA Area Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 4.0 The Proposed Project ........................................................................................................................ 2 5.0 Planning Objectives and Character of Development .................................................................... 4 6.0 Project Benefits ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden in Plain Sight: Eyes on Historic East Somerville
    Hidden in Plain Sight: Eyes on Historic East Somerville Meeting Place: In front of the Mt. Vernon Restaurant at 14 Broadway, on the Charlestown- Somerville border. The tour will take approximately two hours. At the end participants are encouraged to continue their exploration of East Somerville and have a bite to eat and drink at one of the many culinary spots in the neighborhood, along Broadway. East Somerville ranks among the oldest neighborhoods in Somerville, tracing its development back before the Town was incorporated independent of Charlestown in 1842. It is also among the City's largest neighborhoods -- bounded by the Sullivan Square section of Charlestown on the east, the Washington Street/B&M rail corridor on the south, the McGrath and O'Brien Highway on the west, and the Mystic River on the north. Its proximity to a major east-west highway--Broadway--as well as the construction of railroad stations at the periphery of the area during the 1830s and 1840s strongly influenced the initial development of this neighborhood. Because East Somerville has historically been a neighborhood for over 160 years, it has a multi-layered built environment that can be explored via a variety of tour routes. This particular tour will showcase the variety of housing options available to families of all income levels, from Greek Revival and Italianate residences of the 1840s and 1850s, to modest mid-nineteenth century cottages, to substantial post Civil War Mansard Style "trophy houses." We'll also view neighborhood 1 houses of worship, and discuss ongoing and proposed renovation projects of public buildings along Broadway.
    [Show full text]
  • 89/93 Bus Time Schedule & Line
    89/93 bus time schedule & line map 89/93 Haymarket via Sullivan - Clarendon Hill via View In Website Mode Sullivan The 89/93 bus line (Haymarket via Sullivan - Clarendon Hill via Sullivan) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Clarendon Hill Via Sullivan: 5:50 AM (2) Haymarket Via Sullivan: 4:30 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 89/93 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 89/93 bus arriving. Direction: Clarendon Hill Via Sullivan 89/93 bus Time Schedule 41 stops Clarendon Hill Via Sullivan Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 5:50 AM Monday Not Operational Surface Rd @ Hanover St Salem Street, Boston Tuesday Not Operational N Washington St @ Cooper St Wednesday Not Operational North Washington Street, Boston Thursday Not Operational Chelsea St @ Warren St Friday Not Operational 88 Constitution Road, Boston Saturday Not Operational Chelsea St @ Constitution Rd Lowney Way, Boston Chelsea St @ Fifth St 19 Second Avenue, Boston 89/93 bus Info Direction: Clarendon Hill Via Sullivan Vine St @ Moulton St Stops: 41 34 Vine Street, Boston Trip Duration: 24 min Line Summary: Surface Rd @ Hanover St, N 121 Bunker Hill St Opp Lexington St Washington St @ Cooper St, Chelsea St @ Warren St, 134 Bunker Hill Street, Boston Chelsea St @ Constitution Rd, Chelsea St @ Fifth St, Vine St @ Moulton St, 121 Bunker Hill St Opp Bunker Hill St @ Polk St Lexington St, Bunker Hill St @ Polk St, Bunker Hill St 174 Bunker Hill Street, Boston @ Pearl St, Bunker Hill St @ Sackville St, Bunker Hill St @ N Mead St,
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation & Infrastructure Presentation
    Trends in Somerville: Transportation & Infrastructure Report September 2009 Mayor Joseph A. Curtatone City of Somerville Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development Transportation & Infrastructure Trends Report City of Somerville Comprehensive Plan Report Introduction Technical Report #3 I. REPORT INTRODUCTION use in Somerville declined by roughly 20% during the approximate same time period. The City of Somerville depends upon its infrastructure which • The majority of Somerville’s home heating comes from utility provides the fundamental systems needed for residents to undertake gas (62%), significantly more than many of its neighboring their daily routines and employment, for businesses to thrive, and cities: Boston (48%), Brookline (41%), Cambridge (63%), new development to proceed. The transportation network within Chelsea (41%), Everett (50%), and Medford (43%). Somerville allows the population to be mobile and brings people and • Due to the commuter and freight rail lines that run through business into and out of the city. The history and patterns of the city much of Somerville is divided, or connected, by development for both the transportation and infrastructure network bridges. affects the City’s ability to reach economic development and land use • Somerville has made significant investments in its roadways – goals. By understanding the historical patterns and current paving 100 streets in the last four years and completing four capabilities and functionalities of these systems, and comparing our major road reconstruction projects. current conditions with surrounding communities, Somerville can • Somerville's public urban forest comprises over 11,000 better prepare itself to meet future demands and desires. trees, which provide an estimated $16 million in annual ecological, economic, and social benefits to the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucked Away Treasures: East Somerville's Rich History and Architectural Legacy
    Tucked Away Treasures: East Somerville’s Rich History and Architectural Legacy Walking Tour with Ed Gordon, in concert with East Somerville Main Streets – Sunday, June 17, 2019 INTRODUCTION This year’s walking tour is focused primarily on residential buildings located between Broadway and Washington Street on the north and south, along the Somerville/Charlestown border, and Myrtle Street on the east and west. East Somerville, together with Prospect Hill and Spring Hill, were among the first sections of Somerville to experience residential development in a more or less comprehensive manner. Due to the vision and calculated risk-taking of local businessmen, suburban subdivisions made the leap from plans on paper to three dimensional reality in what had been Charlestown’s remote “land beyond the Neck.” This land later separated to become the City of Somerville. A primary goal is to showcase the architecturally, and generally historically, significant private residences that have remained largely intact in this easternmost part of Somerville. The buildings will reflect the variety of architectural styles popular during the Victorian era (1837-1901). The tour will highlight the characteristic features of these different architectural styles and tell the “back stories” of the properties that explain how these styles captured the imaginations of builders and homeowners. The intent is to make historic architectural design more accessible, as well as share the sometimes colorful stories of the buildings’ earliest owners. Broadway is an “ancient” highway that dates back to the 1630s. Originally its path did not extend as it does today up and over Winter Hill, but instead intersected with Main Street, following it to the center of Medford.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 136.58 KB, for Partners Healthcare System
    In The Matter Of: Partners Healthcare System, Inc., Determination of Need Application #PHS-19093011-HS Department of Public Health Vol. I November 20, 2019 Original File DPH_Partners Determination of Need Application.txt Min-U-Script® with Word Index Department of Public Health - Vol. I - November 20, 2019 1 Volume I Pages 1 to 34 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH DETERMINATION OF NEED PROGRAM PUBLIC HEARING RE: Partners Healthcare System, Inc., Determination of Need Application #PHS-19093011-HS Substantial Change in Service Determination of Need Required Equipment Massachusetts General Physicians Organization BEFORE: Margo Michaels, MPH Director, Determination of Need Program Held at: Holiday Inn, Bunker Hill 30 Washington Street Somerville, Massachusetts Wednesday, November 20, 2019 5:59 p.m. Alexander K. Loos, Registered Diplomate Reporter * * * * * D oris O . W ong A ssociates, Inc. Department of Public Health - Vol. I - November 20, 2019 2 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 MS. MICHAELS: Hello. Good evening, 3 everyone. 4 Welcome to the public hearing for the 5 Massachusetts Department of Public Health 6 Determination of Need program. My name is Margo 7 Michaels. I'm the director of the program. 8 And the purpose of tonight's hearing, 9 according to state regulation, is to allow any 10 person to make their views known with respect to an 11 application before the Department. This hearing is 12 not one where we'll be reviewing evidence or hearing 13 arguments. Rather, it's a public forum for the 14 presentation of any comments that might be relevant 15 to the consideration of an application.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report 6.12.2014
    CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR’S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOSEPH A. CURTATONE MAYOR MICHAEL F. GLAVIN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PLANNING DIVISION STAFF GEORGE PROAKIS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING Case #: PB 2006-59-R2(05/2014) LORI MASSA, SENIOR PLANNER Date: June 12, 2014 DAN BARTMAN, SENIOR PLANNER Recommendation: Conditional Approval AMIE HAYES, PLANNER MELISSA WOODS, PLANNER DAWN PEREIRA, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT PLANNING STAFF REPORT Site: Assembly Row Planned Unit Development Preliminary Master Plan Applicant Name: Street Retail, Inc. Applicant Address: 1626 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852 Property Owner Name: The Owners of the parcels within the boundaries of the proposed PUD include FR Assembly Square, LLC, FR Sturtevant Street, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B2, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B3, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B5, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B6, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B7, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B8, LLC, and SRI Assembly Row B9, LLC Row B7, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B8, LLC, SRI Assembly Row B9, LLC, as tenants in common (Parcels: 86-a-1, 67-a-2, 67-a-6, 67-a-7, 85-a-5, 85-a- 8, 85-a-9, 85-a-10, 85-a-11, 85-a-12, 85-a-13, 85-a-14, 85-a-15, 85-a-16, 85-a-17, 85-a-18, 99-a-8, 99-a-13, 99-a-14, 99-a-15, 99-a-16, 99-a-17, 99-a-18). Conveyed to MBTA: 85-a-19, 99-a-10a, 99-a-19. Property Owner Address: 1626 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852 Agent/Attorney Name: Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    + CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS 1626 East Jefferson Street Rockville, MD 20852-4041 PH 301.998.8100 FX 301.998.3700 + WESTERN REGION HEADQUARTERS 3055 Olin Avenue, Suite 2100 San Jose, CA 95128-2069 PH 408.551.4600 THE FX 408.551.4616 NUMBERS SPEAK + REGIONAL OFFICES Boston FOR 5 Middlesex Avenue, 4th Floor THEMSELVES Somerville, MA 02145 PH 617.684.1500 FX 617.623.3601 Philadelphia 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 50 East Wynnewood Road 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 Wynnewood, PA 19096 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 PH 610.896.5870 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 FX 610.896.5876 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 ANNUAL REPORT www.federalrealty.com + FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST BOARD OF TRUSTEES 01 Jon E. Bortz 0102 03 Chairman, CEO and President, LaSalle Hotel Properties 02 David W. Faeder Managing Partner, Fountain Square Properties 03 Kristin Gamble President, Flood Gamble Associates, Inc. 04 Gail P. Steinel 04 05 Former Executive Vice President, Global Commercial Services of BearingPoint, Inc. 05 Warren Thompson President and Chairman, Thompson Hospitality Corporation 06 Joseph S. Vassalluzzo Chairman, Federal Realty Investment Trust Former Vice Chairman, Staples, Inc. 06 07 Donald C. Wood President and Chief Executive Offi cer, 07 Federal Realty Investment Trust CORPORATE EXECUTIVE TEAM YEARS IN (LEFT TO RIGHT) BUSINESS. 45 Donald C. Wood President and Chief Executive Offi cer 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Dawn M.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Reuse of Mega-Stores: Transforming an Icon Of
    Adaptive Reuse of Mega-Stores: Transforming an Icon of Suburban Inefficiency into a Model of Sustainability An Honors Thesis for the Department of Art History Elaine G. Hoffman Tufts University, 2010. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………...i INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….…....1 BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………………....…4 PROBLEM OF VACANCY……………………………..…………………………..…14 SOLUTIONS TO VACANCY……………...……………………………………….....18 CASE STUDIES…………………….……………………………….…...……………..22 Bardstown, Kentucky……………………………………………..……………23 Head Start………...…………………………………………………...…….…..29 Spam Museum………………………………………………….……………….34 Home Depot Center ……………..…………………...……………………...…37 Assembly Square Mall………………………………………….……...….....…43 ASSESSMENT OF CASE STUDIES…………………...………………………….….47 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………....57 BIBLIOGRAPHY……………………………………………………………………....60 Acknowledgements This work could not have come to fruition without the help of many different individuals. My mother introduced me to the topic of big-box reuse and, as a horticulturalist, enthusiastically encouraged me to examine these sites beyond the buildings themselves. My sister provided me with transportation to do on-site research at Assembly Square Mall. Professor Anne Desmarais, whose courses have helped me develop a more nuanced understanding of sustainability that steers this thesis, offered feedback on some of my preliminary research on the topic during the fall. Thanks also to Professor Monica McTighe and Professor Kent Portney for participating on my committee and providing important suggestions for my work. Of course, it would not have been possible without the insights and guidance of Professor Daniel Abramson, who agreed to advise my project and encouraged me to pursue it even when I was apprehensive about it. i I. Introduction The fundamental goal of this thesis is to understand the wide-ranging effects of big-box vacancies on their surrounding environments, and how building and site redesign can combat this increasingly prominent phenomenon.
    [Show full text]