DOCSLIB.ORG

Historic Properties Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 DESABLA-CENTERVILLE HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT No. 803 DRAFT HISTORIC PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT PLAN (Volume I) PREPARED BY: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY February 2008 February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 Page left blank February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 ACKNOWLEGEMENTS Pacific Gas and Electric Company would like to acknowledge the contributions made by the Mechoopda Indian Tribe of the Chico Rancheria, the Greenville Rancheria, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bureau of Land Management. Their assistance during the relicensing process and during the implementation of the cultural resources study plans was greatly appreciated and was essential in order to prepare this Draft Historic Properties Management Plan. It is this spirit of cooperation that will assure the successful completion of a final document and its future implementation. February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Page i Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 Page left blank February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Page ii Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Historic Properties Management Plan (HPMP) is prepared to comply with the conditions of a new license for Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E’s) DeSabla Centerville Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 803 (Project), when issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and with the anticipated “Programmatic Agreement Among the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and the California State Historic Preservation Officer for Managing Historic Properties That May Be Affected by a License Issuing to Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Continued Operation of the DeSabla Centerville Hydroelectric Power Project in Butte County , California" (PA). The purpose of the HPMP is to manage historic properties located within the Project Area of Potential Effects (APE). The HPMP follows the FERC’s "Guidelines for Preparing Cultural Resources Sections of Exhibit E" and utilizes the joint document prepared by the FERC and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) entitled “Draft Guidelines for the Development of Historic Properties Management Plans for FERC Hydroelectric Project License Applicant” (September 21, 1999). The HPMP was prepared in consultation with: • The California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO); • Lassen National Forests (LNF); • Bureau of Land Management; • The Greenville Rancheria; and • The Mechoopda Indian Tribe of the Chico Rancheria. The HPMP prescribes specific activities and processes to manage historic properties within the APE. This plan includes the following topics that will guide the Licensee in applying both general and site-specific treatment measures: • Confidentiality; • General and site-specific treatment measures designed to address ongoing and future effects to historic properties that may be a result of the Project’s operation and maintenance; • A process of consultation with appropriate state and federal agencies, and participating Tribes; • A plan for public interpretation and education; • Procedures for inadvertent discoveries; • Procedures for emergency situations; • A plan for the treatment of human remains; and • A process for HPMP review and revision (as necessary). February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Page iii Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 Page left blank February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Page iv Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 DEFINITIONS OF TERMS, ACRONYMS, AND ABBREVIATIONS TERM DEFINITION ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act of 1978 (AIRFA; Public Law [PL] 95-341; 42 USC APE Area of Potential Effects – “The geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly cause changes in the character or use of historic properties if any such properties exist” (36 CFR § 800.16(d). Archaeological Site An archaeological “site” is defined as an area that contains five or more unformed or formed artifacts per square meter, or an isolated find that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) on its own merit. ARPA Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (ARPA; 16 USC 470aa-mm) CEQA California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA; California Public Resources Code [PRC] 21000) and State CEQA Guidelines (CCR 15000) Consultation The process of seeking, discussing, and considering the views of other participants, and, where feasible, seeking agreement with them regarding matters arising in the Section 106 process” (36 CFR 800.16[f]). Cultural Resources (1) Licensee definition (used in this HPMP): all archaeological, historic and Traditional Cultural Properties regardless of National Register of Historic Place eligibility; (2) Tribal definition recognizes that all of the land and its resources are important to the culture of indigenous people. FEIS Final Environmental Impact Statement FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Ground disturbing “Ground disturbing work” is defined as any work that has a work reasonable potential to expose subsurface cultural materials or February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Page v Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 TERM DEFINITION cause an impact to the archaeological context of cultural materials. Historic Property Any prehistoric or historic district, site, building, structure, or object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and that meet the National Register criteria. The term "eligible for inclusion in the National Register" includes both properties formally determined as such in accordance with regulations of the Secretary of the Interior and all other properties that meet the National Register criteria (36 CFR 800.16[l0]). HPMP Historic Properties Management Plan I&E Plan Information and Education Plan Isolated Find Less than five unformed artifacts per square meter, isolated formed tools, isolated historic items, etc. Licensee Holder of the DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project License, Pacific Gas and Electric Company LNF Lassen National Forest NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA; PL 101-601; 25 USC 3001) NAHC California Native American Heritage Commission NFSL National Forest System Lands NHPA National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA, 16 USC 470) and it’s implementing regulations found at 36 CFR 60 and 36 CFR 800 NOI Notice of Intent NRHP National Register of Historic Places O&M Operation and Maintenance February 2008 Draft Historic Properties Management Plan Volume I ©2008, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Page vi Pacific Gas & Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 TERM DEFINITION OHV Off Highway Vehicle PA Programmatic Agreement PAD Pre-Application Document PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company Participating Tribes Greenville Rancheria and the Mechoopda Indian Tribe of the Chico Rancheria PNF Plumas National Forest Programmatic A document that records the terms and conditions agreed upon to Agreement resolve the potential adverse effects of a Federal agency program, complex undertaking, or other situations (36 CFR 800.16[t]). For the DeSabla Centerville Project, this agreement is between FERC and the SHPO to comply with Section 106 of the Historic Properties Preservation Act Project The DeSabla Centerville Project (FERC No. 803) Project Area Zone of potential, reasonably direct Project impacts. Typically extends 0 to 100 feet out from the FERC Project Boundary. It also includes the following stream reaches which the Project directly impacts: Butte Creek from Butte Creek Diversion Dam down to, but not including, the non-Project Parrott-Phelan Diversion Dam and the WBFR from Round Valley Reservoir down to, but not including, the non-Project Miocene Diversion. Project Vicinity The area extending to about five miles from the Project Boundary.. PSEA Pacific Service Employees’ Association Qualified Tribal a. Must be a member or an authorized representative of the one of Cultural Monitor the Participating Tribes; b. Must have completed all training requirements of the Tribe; c. Must have completed the Licensee’s Cultural Monitor Training Program within two years prior to any monitoring work; and d. Must have demonstrated monitoring skills. Reasonable potential “Reasonable potential for impact” is defined as: (a) ground February 2008 Draft Historic Properties
Recommended publications
  • Hazard Mitigation Planning Elements Specific to the Town of Paradise, a Participating Jurisdiction to the Butte County LHMP Update

    Hazard Mitigation Planning Elements Specific to the Town of Paradise, a Participating Jurisdiction to the Butte County LHMP Update

    Annex E TOWN OF PARADISE E.1 Introduction This Annex details the hazard mitigation planning elements specific to the Town of Paradise, a participating jurisdiction to the Butte County LHMP Update. This annex is not intended to be a standalone document, but appends to and supplements the information contained in the base plan document. As such, all sections of the base plan, including the planning process and other procedural requirements apply to and were met by the Town. This annex provides additional information specific to the Town of Paradise, with a focus on providing additional details on the risk assessment and mitigation strategy for this community. E.2 Planning Process As described above, the Town of Paradise followed the planning process detailed in Section 3.0 of the base plan. In addition to providing representation on the Butte County Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee (HMPC), the Town formulated their own internal planning team to support the broader planning process requirements. Internal planning participants included staff from the following Town departments: Paradise Parks and Recreation Additional details on plan participation and Town representatives are included in Appendix A. E.3 Community Profile The community profile for the Town of Paradise is detailed in the following sections. Figure E.1 displays a map and the location of the Town of Paradise within Butte County. Butte County (Town of Paradise) Annex E.1 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update May 2013 Figure E.1. Town of Paradise Base Map Butte County (Town of Paradise) Annex E.2 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update May 2013 E.3.1 Geography and Location The Town of Paradise is located at the juncture of the western slopes of the Cascade and Sierra Nevada systems in north central Butte County.
  • United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    United States of America Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Pacific Gas and Electric Company, California Project No. 803-087 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (July 24, 2009) In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR Part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 F.R. 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project (project), located on Butte Creek in Butte County, California, and has prepared a final environmental assessment (final EA). In the final EA, Commission staff analyze the potential environmental effects of relicensing the project and conclude that issuing a new license for the project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A copy of the final EA is on file with the Commission and is available for public inspection. The final EA may also be viewed on the Commission’s website at http://www.ferc.gov using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at [email protected] or toll-free at 1-866- 208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR NEW MAJOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 803-087 California Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 July 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................
  • James Gerber Received His Ph. D. in Economics from the University of California, Davis

    James Gerber Received His Ph. D. in Economics from the University of California, Davis

    JAMes gerBer James Gerber received his Ph. D. in Economics from the University of California, Davis. He is professor of Economics and director of the International Business Program at San Diego State University. From 2002 to 2009 he served as the director of the Center for Latin American Studies, also at sdsU. He has been a visiting lecturer at the University of Calgary, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, and the University of Debrecen, in Debrecen, Hungary. His recent publications include Fifty Years of Change on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Growth, Development, and the Quality of Life (2008), with Joan Anderson, and winner of the 2008 Association for Borderlands Studies Book Award; the edited volume Agriculture and Rural Connections in the Pacific, 1500-1900 (2006), with co-editor Lei Guang, and International Economics, 4e (2007). AMérica lAtinA en lA historiA eConóMica, núM. 34 Revista ALHE 34 (CS4).indd 35 09/07/2010 02:36:04 p.m. Resumen Este ensayo explora el casi simultáneo desarrollo de la fiebre de oro y la producción de cereales en la década de 1850 en California. Modelos económicos predicen que la producción de bienes de consumo, como el trigo, no se puede expandir durante un auge del sector minero si existe una fácil disponibilidad de importación, debido a que los costos del trabajo y otros insumos son altos. Diversos historiadores han enfatizado los impactos de la inmigración y el crecimiento del mercado local. Una mirada más cercana del tiempo y la secuencia de los cambios en la producción muestran que un declive de la producción de los bienes comerciales concuerdan relativamente bien con el caso californiano.
  • James Gerber Received His Ph. D. in Economics from the University of California, Davis

    James Gerber Received His Ph. D. in Economics from the University of California, Davis

    JAMes gerBer James Gerber received his Ph. D. in Economics from the University of California, Davis. He is professor of Economics and director of the International Business Program at San Diego State University. From 2002 to 2009 he served as the director of the Center for Latin American Studies, also at sdsU. He has been a visiting lecturer at the University of Calgary, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, and the University of Debrecen, in Debrecen, Hungary. His recent publications include Fifty Years of Change on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Growth, Development, and the Quality of Life (2008), with Joan Anderson, and winner of the 2008 Association for Borderlands Studies Book Award; the edited volume Agriculture and Rural Connections in the Pacific, 1500-1900 (2006), with co-editor Lei Guang, and International Economics, 4e (2007). AMérica lAtinA en lA historiA eConóMica, núM. 34 Revista ALHE 34 (CS4).indd 35 09/07/2010 02:36:04 p.m. Resumen Este ensayo explora el casi simultáneo desarrollo de la fiebre de oro y la producción de cereales en la década de 1850 en California. Modelos económicos predicen que la producción de bienes de consumo, como el trigo, no se puede expandir durante un auge del sector minero si existe una fácil disponibilidad de importación, debido a que los costos del trabajo y otros insumos son altos. Diversos historiadores han enfatizado los impactos de la inmigración y el crecimiento del mercado local. Una mirada más cercana del tiempo y la secuencia de los cambios en la producción muestran que un declive de la producción de los bienes comerciales concuerdan relativamente bien con el caso californiano.
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

    National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

    NFS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 702*0078 (Ftov. 8-86) RECEIVED United States Department of the Interior National Park Service MAY 2 3 1988 National Register of Historic Places NATIONAL Registration Form REGISTER This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1 . Name of Property Honey Run Covered Bridge historic name Honey Run Covered Bridge other names/site number Carr Hill Bridge 2. Location street & number Honev Run Humbug Road Aflnot for publication city, town LxJ vicinity rh1rn state California code CA county Butte code 007 zip code 95928 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing fxl public-local I I district ____ buildings I I public-State site ____ sites I I public-Federal structure ____ structures object ____ objects 1 Q Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 0_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this EJ nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS E. CULTURAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section of the DEIR evaluates potential impacts to cultural resources that may result from implementation of the Stonegate Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map and General Plan Amendment / Rezone (“proposed project”). The information and analysis in this section is based on the following cultural resources reports prepared for the proposed project, which are included in Appendix E of this Draft EIR: Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. (Far Western), Archaeological Survey and Extended Phase I Report for the Stonegate Subdivision Project, Butte County, California, June 2017. ECORP Consulting, Inc., Cultural Resources Evaluation and Finding of Effect for the Stonegate Subdivision Project, City of Chico, Butte County, California, August 2017 Sub Terra Consulting, Archaeology and Paleontology, Peer review of Cultural Resources Evaluation and Finding of Effect for the Stonegate Subdivision Project, City of Chico, Butte County, California, November 2017 Methodology Far Western conducted cultural resources studies for a subdivision, general plan amendment and rezoning of the proposed project in southeast Chico, Butte County, California. These studies included an archival records search at the Northeast Information Center at Chico State University, online research of historical maps and land records, a buried site sensitivity analysis, Native American and Historical Society consultation, and an intensive pedestrian survey and partial metal detector survey. The
  • 4.11 Cultural and Paleontological Resources

    4.11 Cultural and Paleontological Resources

    4.11 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section of the Draft EIR considers and evaluates the potential impacts of the proposed City of Chico General Plan Update on historical, cultural, and paleontological resources. Cultural resources are defined as prehistoric and historic sites, structures, and districts or any other physical evidence associated with human activity considered important to a culture, a subculture, or a community for scientific, traditional, or religious reasons. Paleontological resources include fossil remains, as well as fossil localities and formations which have produced fossil material. For analysis purposes, cultural resources may be categorized into four groups: archaeological resources (prehistoric and historical); historic properties, buildings, and districts; areas of importance to Native Americans; and paleontological resources (fossilized remains of plants and animals). Cultural resource impacts include those to existing historic resources (i.e., historic districts, landmarks, etc.) and to archaeological and paleontological resources. CONCEPTS AND TERMINOLOGY FOR EVALUATION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES The following definitions are common terms used to discuss the regulatory requirements and treatment of cultural resources: Cultural resources is the term used to describe several different types of properties: prehistoric and historical archaeological sites; architectural properties such as buildings, bridges, and infrastructure; and resources of importance to Native Americans. Historic properties is a term
  • Eden Vol16 No2 2013

    Eden Vol16 No2 2013

    Journal of the California Garden & Landscape History Society Vol. 16 No. 2 • Spring 2013 The Trees in California’s Cityscapes Matt Ritter e Californians need not travel to exotic places to see Visalia, to name just a few—in no small part is due to well- W an eclectic mix of trees from all corners of the Earth; tended trees lining the streets, filling parks, gracing archi- we can just stroll down a local street and look up. Califor- tecture, and inhabiting the front and back yards of most nia’s agreeable climate and rich horticultural history have homes. Trees also make the state’s largest cities—Los An- converged to populate our towns and cities with trees that geles, San Francisco, San Diego, Oakland, San Jose, Sacra- reward those who notice them with vibrant color, bizarre mento, and Fresno—healthier and far more livable. shapes, unusual textures, and unexpected smells. Besides an Most of California is blessed with a diverse and agree- abundant array of native able Mediterranean climate trees in their accustomed that creates a wide range of habitats, California has growing conditions for park, garden, and street trees. The dry, practically trees—our so-called urban frost-free areas of coastal forest—that are among the San Diego, the warm and most splendid and varied in sunny Los Angeles Basin, the world. These beautiful the opulent and balmy gar- organisms, all around us, dens of Santa Barbara, the are vital to our wellbeing seasonally distinct, rich, and worthy of our praise alluvial plains of the Sacra- and fascination.
  • Butte County Place Names

    Butte County Place Names

    d BUTTE COUNTY PLACE NAMES A Geographical and Historical Dictionary Compiled by FORREST D. DUNN Occasional Publication Number 3 ASSOCIATION FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA K RECORDS AND RESEARCH A P.O. Box 3024 CHICO, CA 95927 \ z • U OFFICERS and DIRECTORS: 1976 -1977 ASSOCIATION for NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORDS and RESEARCH (ANCRR) President Joseph F. McGie, Gridley, CA Vice President Lois Halliday McDonald, Magalia, CA Vice President Andrew J. Osborne, Red Bluff, CA Secretary . Lola M. Starr, Paradise, CA Treasurer W.H. Hutchinson, Chico, CA Project Director and Curator Dr. Norris A. Bleyhl, Chico, CA A COLLECTION OF PLACES IN BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA v A GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF GOLD CAMPS, TOWNS, RAILROAD STATIONS, SCHOOLS, POST OFFICES, RIVERS, STREAMS, GULCHES, BARS, AND OTHER PUCE DESIGNATIONS; OR, WHAT YOU ALWAYS WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT BUTTE COUNTY BUT DIDN'T KNOW WHERE TO ASK Compiled by FORREST D. DUNN Occasional Publication Number 3 ASSOCIATION FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORDS AND RESEARCH P.O. Box 302)4 CHICO, CA 95927 I began researching a project connected with Butbo County about a year and a half ago. I made copious notes and after a few months, I found that I had notes in various notebooks, stuffed in corners and lost. In tracing down the location of where a particular event took place, I really dicta* t know any more than when I had started. I quickly learned that in order to have a workable base from which to start, I would have to create my own collection of identifiable places in time and geographic location,, These would preferably include map co-ordinates.
  • Late Prehistoric Change in the Feather River Watershed, Butte County, California

    Late Prehistoric Change in the Feather River Watershed, Butte County, California

    LATE PREHISTORIC CHANGE IN THE FEATHER RIVER WATERSHED, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Anthropology California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in Anthropology by Ryan Timothy Bradshaw FALL 2020 © 2020 Ryan Timothy Bradshaw ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii LATE PREHISTORIC CHANGE IN THE FEATHER RIVER WATERSHED, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A Thesis by Ryan Timothy Bradshaw Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Michael G. Delacorte, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Nathan E. Stevens, Ph.D. ____________________________ Date iii Student: Ryan Timothy Bradshaw I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and this thesis is suitable for electronic submission to the library and credit is to be awarded for the thesis. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Jacob L. Fisher, Ph.D. Date Department of Anthropology iv Abstract of LATE PREHISTORIC CHANGE IN THE FEATHER RIVER WATERSHED, BUTTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA by Ryan Timothy Bradshaw This study examines the idea that the introduction of the bow and arrow precipitated late prehistoric culture change in the Sierra Nevada foothills of Butte County, California. Based on Bettinger’s (2015) Orderly Anarchy Model, it is hypothesized that the hunting efficiency gained by the bow promoted a settlement and subsistence strategy that was conducive to plant resource intensification. Data for this thesis derive from archaeological investigations conducted during large infrastructure projects during the 1950s and 1960s, along with more recent work undertaken as part of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission relicensing project of the Lake Oroville Facilities.
  • Acronyms and Abbreviations

    Acronyms and Abbreviations

    PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY DeSabla-Centerville Hydroelectric Project FERC Project No. 803 License Application Volume IID: Exhibit E (Section 6.9 Land Use) through Section 13.0 Literature Cited October 2007 © 2007, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company DeSabla-Centerville Project FERC Project No. 803 VOLUME IID TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Description Page 6.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT(continued) 6.9 Land Use.........................................................................................................E6.9-1 6.9.1 Historical Information.........................................................................E6.9-1 6.9.1.1 Land Management Plans and Land Use Management Descriptions .........................................................................E6.9-1 6.9.1.2 Land Use and Management within and Adjacent to the Project Boundary............................................................E6.9-6 6.9.1.3 Licensee’s Shoreline Permitting Policies...........................E6.9-10 6.9.1.4 Land Use and Management Adjacent to Project Affected River Reaches .....................................................E6.9-11 6.9.2 PG&E Relicensing Studies ...............................................................E6.9-17 6.10 Aesthetic Resources......................................................................................E6.10-1 6.10.1 Overview...........................................................................................E6.10-1 6.10.2 Aesthetic Resources and Related Management Guidelines
  • Note: This Is an Adaptation of a Report Currently in the HAER Collection at the Library of Congress to Illustrate the Outline Format: Engineering Structures

    Note: This Is an Adaptation of a Report Currently in the HAER Collection at the Library of Congress to Illustrate the Outline Format: Engineering Structures

    Note: This is an adaptation of a report currently in the HAER collection at the Library of Congress to illustrate the outline format: engineering structures. HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD HONEY RUN BRIDGE (Carr Hill Road Bridge) HAER No. CA-312 Location: Spanning Butte Creek at bypassed section of Honey Run Road (originally Carr Hill Road), Paradise vicinity, Butte County, California Honey Run Bridge is located at latitude: 39.75972, longitude: -121.62083. The coordinate represents the west end of the bridge. It was obtained in September 2002 by plotting its location on the Hamlin Canyon, California Quad map. The Honey Run Bridge has no restriction on its release to the public. Present Owner: Butte County, California; the Honey Run Bridge Association cares for the structure Present Use: Historic landmark and tourist attraction Significance: Honey Run Bridge is the best preserved of four surviving examples of Pratt-type wood covered bridges in the United States. Thomas and Caleb Pratt patented the Pratt truss in 1844, which features wood compression members and iron tension members. The design, favored for its strength and adaptability, became the standard American truss for moderate spans on both railroads and highways by 1870 and remained so well into the twentieth century. Historian: Lola Bennett, September 2002 Project Information: The National Covered Bridges Recording Project is part of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER), a long-range program to document historically significant engineering and industrial works in the United States. HAER is administered by the Historic American Buildings Survey/Historic American Engineering Record/Historic American Landscapes Survey, a division of the National Park Service, U.S.