A Mechanism for Glycoconjugate Vaccine Activation of the Adaptive Immune System and Its Implications for Vaccine Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Mechanism for Glycoconjugate Vaccine Activation of the Adaptive Immune System and Its Implications for Vaccine Design ARTICLES A mechanism for glycoconjugate vaccine activation of the adaptive immune system and its implications for vaccine design Fikri Y Avci1,2, Xiangming Li3, Moriya Tsuji3 & Dennis L Kasper1,2 Glycoconjugate vaccines have provided enormous health benefits globally, but they have been less successful in some populations at high risk for developing disease. To identify new approaches to enhancing glycoconjugate effectiveness, we investigated molecular and cellular mechanisms governing the immune response to a prototypical glycoconjugate vaccine. We found that in antigen-presenting cells a carbohydrate epitope is generated upon endolysosomal processing of group B streptococcal type III polysaccharide coupled to a carrier protein. In conjunction with a carrier protein–derived peptide, this carbohydrate epitope binds major histocompatibility class II (MHCII) and stimulates carbohydrate-specific CD4+ T cell clones to produce interleukins 2 and 4—cytokines essential for providing T cell help to antibody-producing B cells. An archetypical glycoconjugate vaccine that we constructed to maximize the presentation of carbohydrate-specific T cell epitopes is 50–100 times more potent and substantially more protective in a neonatal mouse model of group B Streptococcus infection than a vaccine constructed by methods currently used by the vaccine industry. Our discovery of how glycoconjugates are processed resulting in presentation of carbohydrate epitopes that stimulate CD4+ T cells has key implications for glycoconjugate vaccine design that could result in greatly enhanced vaccine efficacy. Pathogenic extracellular bacteria often express high-molecular- (Supplementary Fig. 1)—overlooks the strong covalent linkage of weight capsular polysaccharides (CPSs) that coat the microbial carbohydrates to proteins in glycoconjugate vaccines that is unlikely to be surface. CPSs have been considered T cell–independent antigens1–5, broken within the endosome3,5. This current hypothesis of peptide-only primarily because, when used as vaccines, they induce specific IgM presentation has been promulgated mainly because proteins have gener- responses in wild-type and T cell–deficient mice without inducing ally been viewed as the only antigens presented by MHCII molecules to much IgM-to-IgG switching3, fail to induce a booster response (that T cells. We considered whether T cells can recognize carbohydrates if is, a secondary antibody response after recall immunization) and fail they are covalently linked to another molecule (for example, a peptide) © 2011 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. All rights Inc. America, Nature © 2011 to induce sustained T cell memory4. that allows MHCII to present the hydrophilic carbohydrate on the anti- The advantages of glycoconjugate vaccines over pure glycans in induc- gen-presenting cell (APC) surface. We hypothesized that T cell failure to ing immune responses are well documented5. Covalent coupling of a respond to carbohydrates (for example, bacterial CPSs) is due to failure T cell–independent CPS to a carrier protein yields a glycoconjugate that, of these molecules to bind MHCII, not to T cell inability to recognize when used to immunize mammals, elicits T cell help for B cells that pro- presented glycans. We tested this hypothesis to gain insight into the duce IgG antibodies to the polysaccharide component5–11. Thus glycocon- mechanisms involved in carbohydrate processing and presentation by jugates induce polysaccharide-specific IgM-to-IgG switching, memory MHCII and in subsequent T cell recognition of glycoconjugate vaccines. B cell development and long-lived T cell memory. Glycoconjugate An understanding of the immune mechanisms involved in glycoconju- vaccines have played an enormous part in preventing infectious dis- gate immunization is crucial in the rational design of new-generation eases caused by virulent pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae, vaccines against emerging infections. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis9,12. However, the immunogenicity of these glycoconjugates has been variable, and this RESULTS variability has been attributed to the structure of the particular polysac- MHCII-presented carbohydrate epitopes elicit T cell help charide in a given construct13,14. In addition, in some populations at We investigated the mechanisms underlying APC processing and high risk for developing disease, such as the elderly or immunocom- presentation of glycoconjugates consisting of the type III polysaccha- promised individuals, immunogenicity has been relatively poor5,9. The ride of group B Streptococcus (GBSIII), a typical T cell–independent current hypothesis—that, in the context of MHCII, a peptide gener- polysaccharide, coupled to a carrier protein or peptide such as oval- 15 ated from glycoconjugates is presented to and recognized by T cells bumin (OVA), tetanus toxoid (TT) or ovalbumin peptide (OVAp). 1Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2Department of Microbiology and Immunobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3HIV and Malaria Vaccine Program, Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Affiliate of The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA. Correspondence should be addressed to D.L.K. ([email protected]). Received 16 August; accepted 22 September; published online 20 November 2011; doi:10.1038/nm.2535 1602 VOLUME 17 | NUMBER 12 | DECEMBER 2011 NaTURE MEDICINE a RTICLES Figure 1 GBSIII-specific IgG secretion can + a b be stimulated by CD4 T cells recognizing P < 0.0001 12 22 carbohydrate epitopes. (a,b) Concentration of IgG P < 0.0001 ) ) 20 –1 antibody to GBSIII in BALB/c mice (four to six mice –1 10 18 g ml per group) primed (day 0) and boosted (day 14) g ml µ µ 16 with different antigen combinations, as measured 8 14 by ELISA in serum obtained on day 21. Mice 12 6 primed with III-OVA and boosted with unconjugated 10 GBSIII and mice primed with unconjugated GBSIII 4 8 and boosted with III-TT had significantly lower 6 specific IgG levels than either mice primed and 4 2 *** *** *** *** Antibody concentration ( boosted with III-OVA or mice primed with III-OVA Antibody concentration ( 2 and boosted with III-TT (***P < 0.0001). None of 0 0 GBSIII Day 0: III-OVA III-OVA III-OVAIII-OVA III-OVA III-OVA III-OVA GBSIII III-TT the mice had detectable antibodies to either GBSIII Day 0: PBS OVA GBSIII + III-OVA Day 11, 13: anti-CD4 isotype or OVA before immunization (data not shown). OVA GBSIII Day 14: III-OVA III-TT III-TT III-TT GBSIII TT + III-TT III-TT Data represent means ± s.e.m. Day 14: III-OVA III-OVA III-OVA III-OVA III-OVA TT We first examined the adaptive immune response to glycoconjugates These results strongly support recruitment of T cell help for induc- by priming mice with OVA and boosting them 2 weeks later with tion of GBSIII carbohydrate-specific secondary immune responses GBSIII conjugated to OVA (III-OVA). We compared polysaccha- via carbohydrate recognition. ride-specific IgG levels in the sera of these mice with levels in the Another possible explanation for our finding that type III sera of mice both primed and boosted with the conjugate. Priming of polysaccharide–specific antibody response could be primed with naive mice with the carrier alone did not generate a robust second- III-OVA and boosted with III-TT is that activated B cells respond ary antibody response to the polysaccharide upon boosting with the to III-TT without T cell help. We tested this possibility by boosting glycoconjugate (Fig. 1a). However, mice primed and boosted with III-OVA–primed mice with III-TT after treatment with antibody the glycoconjugate had strong IgG responses after recall vaccina- to CD4 during the interval between priming and boosting. The tion (Fig. 1a). To determine whether the inability of OVA to induce excellent booster response observed in isotype control antibody– a priming response for glycoconjugate boosting is due to a failure treated mice was abolished in CD4-specific antibody–treated mice of T cell or B cell priming, we immunized mice with an unconju- (Fig. 1b). By flow cytometry, we found that there was complete gated mixture of GBSIII and OVA, thereby providing B cells that depletion of CD4+ T cells from CD4-specific antibody–treated mice had recent experience with GBSIII and T cells that had experience before secondary vaccination (Supplementary Fig. 2c). In addi- with presentation of the peptides derived from the OVA protein, tion, mice primed with III-OVA and boosted with GBSIII, TT or and then boosted these mice with the glycoconjugate (Fig. 1a). After GBSIII plus TT had no booster response. These results led us to III-OVA recall immune stimulation, mice primed with GBSIII plus further examine the mechanisms by which CD4+ T cell recogni- OVA—unlike III-OVA–primed mice—had essentially no secondary tion of GBSIII glycoconjugate vaccines could be mediated by the antibody response to the glycan (Fig. 1a). We measured OVA-specific carbohydrate portion. IgG titers and GBSIII-specific IgG and IgM titers after only a priming dose of either GBSIII plus OVA or III-OVA. GBSIII-specific IgG was Glycoconjugate carbohydrate is processed into smaller glycans detectable only after priming of mice with III-OVA (Supplementary To investigate the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in © 2011 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved. All rights Inc. America, Nature © 2011 Fig. 2a). Serum levels of IgM antibody to GBSIII were similar in both immunization with GBSIII-containing glycoconjugates, we first groups of immunized mice, whether the glycan was conjugated or not examined glycoconjugate processing and presentation by APCs (Supplementary Fig. 2b), an observation suggesting equivalent levels (for example, B cells or dendritic cells). Some CPSs are taken up by of carbohydrate-specific B cell priming. After priming, approximately APC endosomes and depolymerized into smaller carbohydrates by the same level of OVA-specific IgG was measured in serum from oxidative agents such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive both groups; this result suggested that OVA-specific T cell help was nitrogen species16,17.
Recommended publications
  • Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins: a Historical Review*
    577 Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins: A Historical Review* Alan T. Nurden, PhD1 1 L’Institut de Rhythmologie et Modélisation Cardiaque (LIRYC), Address for correspondence Alan T. Nurden, PhD, L’Institut de Plateforme Technologique et d’Innovation Biomédicale (PTIB), Rhythmologie et Modélisation Cardiaque, Plateforme Technologique Hôpital Xavier Arnozan, Pessac, France et d’Innovation Biomédicale, Hôpital Xavier Arnozan, Avenue du Haut- Lévèque, 33600 Pessac, France (e-mail: [email protected]). Semin Thromb Hemost 2014;40:577–584. Abstract The search for the components of the platelet surface that mediate platelet adhesion and platelet aggregation began for earnest in the late 1960s when electron microscopy demonstrated the presence of a carbohydrate-rich, negatively charged outer coat that was called the “glycocalyx.” Progressively, electrophoretic procedures were developed that identified the major membrane glycoproteins (GP) that constitute this layer. Studies on inherited disorders of platelets then permitted the designation of the major effectors of platelet function. This began with the discovery in Paris that platelets of patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia, an inherited disorder of platelet aggregation, Keywords lacked two major GP. Subsequent studies established the role for the GPIIb-IIIa complex ► platelet (now known as integrin αIIbβ3)inbindingfibrinogen and other adhesive proteins on ► inherited disorder activated platelets and the formation of the protein bridges that join platelets together ► membrane in the platelet aggregate. This was quickly followed by the observation that platelets of glycoproteins patients with the Bernard–Soulier syndrome, with macrothrombocytopenia and a ► Glanzmann distinct disorder of platelet adhesion, lacked the carbohydrate-rich, negatively charged, thrombasthenia GPIb. It was shown that GPIb, through its interaction with von Willebrand factor, ► Bernard–Soulier mediated platelet attachment to injured sites in the vessel wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Glycoconjugate Vaccines: an Overview of Classic and Modern Approaches Cite This: Chem
    Chem Soc Rev View Article Online TUTORIAL REVIEW View Journal | View Issue Antimicrobial glycoconjugate vaccines: an overview of classic and modern approaches Cite this: Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 9015 for protein modification Francesco Berti * and Roberto Adamo * Glycoconjugate vaccines obtained by chemical linkage of a carbohydrate antigen to a protein are part of routine vaccinations in many countries. Licensed antimicrobial glycan–protein conjugate vaccines are obtained by random conjugation of native or sized polysaccharides to lysine, aspartic or glutamic amino acid residues that are generally abundantly exposed on the protein surface. In the last few years, the structural approaches for the definition of the polysaccharide portion (epitope) responsible for the immunological activity has shown potential to aid a deeper understanding of the mode of action of glycoconjugates and to lead to the rational design of more efficacious and safer vaccines. The combination of technologies to obtain more defined carbohydrate antigens of higher purity and novel approaches for Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. Received 12th June 2018 protein modification has a fundamental role. In particular, methods for site selective glycoconjugation like DOI: 10.1039/c8cs00495a chemical or enzymatic modification of specific amino acid residues, incorporation of unnatural amino acids and glycoengineering, are rapidly evolving. Here we discuss the state of the art of protein engineering with rsc.li/chem-soc-rev carbohydrates to obtain glycococonjugates vaccines and future perspectives. Key learning points (a) The covalent linkage with proteins is fundamental to transform carbohydrates, which are per se T-cell independent antigens, in immunogens capable of This article is licensed under a evoking a long-lasting T-cell memory response.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiluteogenic Effects of Serial Prostaglandin F2α Administration in Mares
    ANTILUTEOGENIC EFFECTS OF SERIAL PROSTAGLANDIN F2α ADMINISTRATION IN MARES Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University Elizabeth Ann Coffman Graduate ProGram in Comparative and Veterinary Medicine The Ohio State University 2013 Thesis committee: Carlos R.F. Pinto PhD, MV, DACT; Dissertation Advisor Marco A. Coutinho da Silva PhD, MV, DACT; Academic Advisor Christopher Premanandan PhD, DVM, DACVP Copyright by Elizabeth Ann Coffman 2013 Abstract For breedinG manaGement and estrus synchronization, prostaGlandin F2α (PGF) is one of the most commonly utilized hormones to pharmacologically manipulate the equine estrous cycle. There is a general supposition a sinGle dose of PGF does not consistently induce luteolysis in the equine corpus luteum (CL) until at least five to six days after ovulation. This leads to the erroneous assumption that the early CL (before day five after ovulation) is refractory to the luteolytic effects of PGF. An experiment was desiGned to test the hypotheses that serial administration of PGF in early diestrus would induce a return to estrus similar to mares treated with a sinGle injection in mid diestrus, and fertility of the induced estrus for the two treatment groups would not differ. The specific objectives of the study were to evaluate the effects of early diestrus treatment by: 1) assessing the luteal function as reflected by hormone profile for concentration of plasma progesterone; 2) determininG the duration of interovulatory and treatment to ovulation intervals; 3) comparing of the number of pregnant mares at 14 days post- ovulation. The study consisted of a balanced crossover desiGn in which reproductively normal Quarter horse mares (n=10) were exposed to two treatments ii on consecutive reproductive cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genome-Wide Shrna Screen Identifies GAS1 As a Novel Melanoma Metastasis Suppressor Gene
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 5, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press A genome-wide shRNA screen identifies GAS1 as a novel melanoma metastasis suppressor gene Stephane Gobeil,1 Xiaochun Zhu,1 Charles J. Doillon,2 and Michael R. Green1,3 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Programs in Gene Function and Expression and Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA; 2Oncology and Molecular Endocrinology Research Center, CHUL’s Research Center, CHUQ, Laval University, Quebec City, Québec G1V 4G2, Canada Metastasis suppressor genes inhibit one or more steps required for metastasis without affecting primary tumor formation. Due to the complexity of the metastatic process, the development of experimental approaches for identifying genes involved in metastasis prevention has been challenging. Here we describe a genome-wide RNAi screening strategy to identify candidate metastasis suppressor genes. Following expression in weakly metastatic B16-F0 mouse melanoma cells, shRNAs were selected based upon enhanced satellite colony formation in a three-dimensional cell culture system and confirmed in a mouse experimental metastasis assay. Using this approach we discovered 22 genes whose knockdown increased metastasis without affecting primary tumor growth. We focused on one of these genes, Gas1 (Growth arrest-specific 1), because we found that it was substantially down-regulated in highly metastatic B16-F10 melanoma cells, which contributed to the high metastatic potential of this mouse cell line. We further demonstrated that Gas1 has all the expected properties of a melanoma tumor suppressor including: suppression of metastasis in a spontaneous metastasis assay, promotion of apoptosis following dissemination of cells to secondary sites, and frequent down-regulation in human melanoma metastasis-derived cell lines and metastatic tumor samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Glypican (Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan) Is Palmitoylated, Deglycanated and Reglycanated During Recycling in Skin Fibroblasts
    Glycobiology vol. 7 no. 1 pp. 103-112, 1997 Glypican (heparan sulfate proteoglycan) is palmitoylated, deglycanated and reglycanated during recycling in skin fibroblasts Gudrun Edgren1, Birgitta Havsmark, Mats Jonsson and granules (for reviews, see Kjell6n and Lindahl, 1991; Bernfield Lars-Ake Fransson et al., 1992; David, 1993; Heinegard and Oldberg, 1993). Pro- teoglycans are classified according to the characteristic fea- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden tures or properties of the core protein and can appear in many 'To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Cell and glycoforms giving rise to considerable structural variation and Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/glycob/article/7/1/103/725516 by guest on 30 September 2021 Molecular Biology 1, POB 94, S-221 00, Lund, Sweden functional diversity. In general, the protein part determines the destination of the proteoglycan and interacts with other mol- Skin fibroblasts treated with brefeldin A produce a recy- ecules at the final location. The glycan part provides the overall cling variant of glypican (a glycosylphosphatidylinositol- bulk properties as well as binding sites for other gly- anchored heparan-sulfate proteoglycan) that is resistant to cosaminoglycans and many types of proteins, including matrix inositol-specific phospholipase C and incorporates sulfate proteins, plasma proteins, enzymes, anti-proteinases, growth and glucosamine into heparan sulfate chains (Fransson, factors, and cytokines. L.-A. et aL, Glycobiology, 5, 407-415, 1995). We have now Cultured human fibroblasts synthesize, deposit, and secrete investigated structural modifications of recycling glypican, 3 a variety of proteoglycans and have been used extensively to such as fatty acylation from [ H]palmitate, and degrada- investigate both their biosynthesis and functional properties tion and assembly of heparan sulfate side chains.
    [Show full text]
  • Glycoconjugates
    Background Information on Glycoconjugates Richard D. Cummings, Ph.D. Director, National Center for Functional Glycomics Professor Department of Surgery Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Boston, MA 02114 Tel: (617) 735-4643 e-mail: [email protected] For General Reference On-Line See: Essentials of Glycobiology (2nd Edition) Varki, Cummings, Esko, Freeze, Stanley, Bertozzi, Hart and Etzler) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1908/ Mammalian Cells are Covered with Glycoconjugates GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS/ GLYCOPROTEINS PROTEOGLYCANS GLYCOLIPIDS NUCLEAR/CYTOPLASMIC GLYCOPROTEINS 2 Mammalian Glycoconjugates are Recognized by a Wide Variety of Specific Proteins GLYCAN-BINDING PROTEIN (GBP) GBP ANTIBODY TOXIN GBP GBP VIRUS 7 ANTIBODY GBP MICROBE TOXIN 3 Glycosylation Pathways 4 Glycosylation Pathways 5 Glycoconjugates, Which are Molecules Containing Sugars (Monosaccharides) Linked Within Them, are the Major Constituents of Animal Cell Membranes (Glycocalyx) and Secreted Material: See Different Classes of Glycoconjugates Below in Red Boxes PROTEOGLYCANS GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS GLYCOPROTEINS GPI-ANCHORED GLYCOPROTEINS GLYCOLIPIDS outside Cell Membrane cytoplasm Essentials of Glycobiology, 3rd Edition CYTOPLASMIC GLYCOPROTEINS Chapter 1, Figure 6 Glycans are as Ubiquitous as DNA/RNA and Appear to Represent Greater Molecular Diversity 7 Big Picture: Nucleotide Sugars Connection of • UDP-Glc, • UDP-Gal, • UDP-GlcNAc, Glycoconjugate • UDPGalNAc, • UDP-GlcA, Biosynthesis • UDP-Xyl, • GDP-Man, • GDP-Fuc, to Intermediary • CMP-Neu5Ac used for synthesizing Metabolism glycoconjugates, e.g, glycoproteins & glycolipids 8 Important Topics to Consider 1. The different types of monosaccharides found in animal cell glycoconjugates 2. The different types of glycoconjugates and their differences, e.g. glycoproteins, glycolipids 3. The nucleotide sugars, glycosyltransferases, glycosidases, transporters, endoplasmic reticulum, and Golgi in terms of their roles in glycoconjugate biosynthesis and turnover 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-CA15.3 and Anti-CA125 Antibodies and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Results from the EPIC Cohort
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on April 16, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0744 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Anti-CA15.3 and anti-CA125 antibodies and ovarian cancer risk: Results from the EPIC cohort Daniel W. Cramer1,2,3, Raina N. Fichorova2,3,4, Kathryn L. Terry1,2,3, Hidemi Yamamoto4, Allison F. Vitonis1, Eva Ardanaz5,6,7 Dagfinn Aune8, Heiner Boeing9, Jenny Brändstedt10,11 Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault12,13, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque14,15,16, Miren Dorronsoro17, Laure Dossus18, Eric J Duell19, Inger T. Gram20, Marc Gunter18, Louise Hansen21, Annika Idahl22, Theron Johnson23, Kay-Tee Khaw24,Vittorio Krogh25, Marina Kvaskoff12,13, Amalia Mattiello26, Giuseppe Matullo27, Melissa A. Merritt8 Björn Nodin28, Philippos Orfanos29,30, N. Charlotte Onland-Moret31, Domenico Palli32, Eleni Peppa29, J. Ramón Quirós33, Maria-Jose Sánchez34,35, Gianluca Severi12,13, Anne Tjønneland36, Ruth C. Travis37, Antonia Trichopoulou29,30, Rosario Tumino38, Elisabete Weiderpass39,40,41,42, Renée T. Fortner23, Rudolf Kaaks23 1Epidemiology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S. 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S. 3Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S. 4Laboratory of Genital Tract Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S. 5 Navarra Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain 6IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain 7CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain 8School of Public Health, Imperial College London, UK 9German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany 10Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden 11Division of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden 12 CESP, INSERM U1018, Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide in Human Nasal Mucosa
    Vasoactive intestinal peptide in human nasal mucosa. J N Baraniuk, … , J H Shelhamer, M A Kaliner J Clin Invest. 1990;86(3):825-831. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI114780. Research Article Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), which is present with acetylcholine in parasympathetic nerve fibers, may have important regulatory functions in mucous membranes. The potential roles for VIP in human nasal mucosa were studied using an integrated approach. The VIP content of human nasal mucosa was determined to be 2.84 +/- 0.47 pmol/g wet weight (n = 8) by RIA. VIP-immunoreactive nerve fibers were found to be most concentrated in submucosal glands adjacent to serous and mucous cells. 125I-VIP binding sites were located on submucosal glands, epithelial cells, and arterioles. In short-term explant culture, VIP stimulated lactoferrin release from serous cells but did not stimulate [3H]glucosamine-labeled respiratory glycoconjugate secretion. Methacholine was more potent than VIP, and methacholine stimulated both lactoferrin and respiratory glycoconjugate release. The addition of VIP plus methacholine to explants resulted in additive increases in lactoferrin release. Based upon the autoradiographic distribution of 125I-VIP binding sites and the effects on explants, VIP derived from parasympathetic nerve fibers may function in the regulation of serous cell secretion in human nasal mucosa. VIP may also participate in the regulation of vasomotor tone. Find the latest version: https://jci.me/114780/pdf Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide in Human Nasal Mucosa James
    [Show full text]
  • Heparin/Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans Glycomic Interactome in Angiogenesis: Biological Implications and Therapeutical Use
    Molecules 2015, 20, 6342-6388; doi:10.3390/molecules20046342 OPEN ACCESS molecules ISSN 1420-3049 www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules Review Heparin/Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycans Glycomic Interactome in Angiogenesis: Biological Implications and Therapeutical Use Paola Chiodelli, Antonella Bugatti, Chiara Urbinati and Marco Rusnati * Section of Experimental Oncology and Immunology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia 25123, Italy; E-Mails: [email protected] (P.C.); [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (C.U.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-030-371-7315; Fax: +39-030-371-7747. Academic Editor: Els Van Damme Received: 26 February 2015 / Accepted: 1 April 2015 / Published: 10 April 2015 Abstract: Angiogenesis, the process of formation of new blood vessel from pre-existing ones, is involved in various intertwined pathological processes including virus infection, inflammation and oncogenesis, making it a promising target for the development of novel strategies for various interventions. To induce angiogenesis, angiogenic growth factors (AGFs) must interact with pro-angiogenic receptors to induce proliferation, protease production and migration of endothelial cells (ECs). The action of AGFs is counteracted by antiangiogenic modulators whose main mechanism of action is to bind (thus sequestering or masking) AGFs or their receptors. Many sugars, either free or associated to proteins, are involved in these interactions, thus exerting a tight regulation of the neovascularization process. Heparin and heparan sulfate proteoglycans undoubtedly play a pivotal role in this context since they bind to almost all the known AGFs, to several pro-angiogenic receptors and even to angiogenic inhibitors, originating an intricate network of interaction, the so called “angiogenesis glycomic interactome”.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Quantification of Antiborlies to the Extracellular Domain of PO During Experimental Allergic Neuritis
    Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 117 (1993) 197-205 197 © 1993 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. All rights resetved 0022-SlOX/93/$06.00 JNS 04021 Detection and quantification of antiborlies to the extracellular domain of PO during experimental allergic neuritis J.J. Archelos a, K. Roggenbuck a, J. Schneider-Schaulies b, K.V. Toyka a and H.-P. Hartung a a Department of Neuro/ogy and Multiple Sc/erosis Research Group, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, D-8700 Würzburg, Germany, and b Institute of Virology and lmmunobio/ogy, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Versbacher Str. 7, D-8700 Würzburg, Germany (Received 13 August, 1992) (Revised, received 18 December, 1992) (Accepted 2 January, 1993) Key words: PO; Extracellular domain; Neuritis; GBS; Auto-antibodies Summary Quantification of the peripheral nerve myelin glycoprotein PO and antibodies to PO is difficult due to insolubility of PO in physiological solutions. We have overcome this problern by using the water-soluble recombinant form of the extracellular domain of PO (PO-ED) and describe newly developed assays which allow detection and quantitation of PO and antibodies to PO, in serum and cerebraspinal fluid (CSF). These sensitive and specific assays based on the ELISA technique were used to study humoral immune responses to PO during experimental autoimmune ("allergic") neuritis (EAN). In order to establish these tests, monoclonal antiborlies to different epitopes of rodent and human PO-ED were produced. A two-antibody sandwich-ELISA allowing quantitation of PO Oower detection Iimit of 0.5 ngjml or 30 fmoljml) and an antibody-capture ELISA (lower detection Iimit 1 ng specific antibody jml) to detect antiborlies to PO in serum and CSF were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein C Product Monograph 1995 COAMATIC® Protein C Protein C
    Protein C Product Monograph 1995 COAMATIC® Protein C Protein C Protein C, Product Monograph 1995 Frank Axelsson, Product Information Manager Copyright © 1995 Chromogenix AB. Version 1.1 Taljegårdsgatan 3, S-431 53 Mölndal, Sweden. Tel: +46 31 706 20 00, Fax: +46 31 86 46 26, E-mail: [email protected], Internet: www.chromogenix.se COAMATIC® Protein C Protein C Contents Page Preface 2 Introduction 4 Determination of protein C activity with 4 snake venom and S-2366 Biochemistry 6 Protein C biochemistry 6 Clinical Aspects 10 Protein C deficiency 10 Assay Methods 13 Protein C assays 13 Laboratory aspects 16 Products 17 Diagnostic kits from Chromogenix 17 General assay procedure 18 COAMATIC® Protein C 19 References 20 Glossary 23 3 Protein C, version 1.1 Preface The blood coagulation system is carefully controlled in vivo by several anticoagulant mechanisms, which ensure that clot propagation does not lead to occlusion of the vasculature. The protein C pathway is one of these anticoagulant systems. During the last few years it has been found that inherited defects of the protein C system are underlying risk factors in a majority of cases with familial thrombophilia. The factor V gene mutation recently identified in conjunction with APC resistance is such a defect which, in combination with protein C deficiency, increases the thrombosis risk considerably. The Chromogenix Monographs [Protein C and APC-resistance] give a didactic and illustrated picture of the protein C environment by presenting a general view of medical as well as technical matters. They serve as an excellent introduction and survey to everyone who wishes to learn quickly about this field of medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist
    2 Vaccine Immunology Claire-Anne Siegrist To generate vaccine-mediated protection is a complex chal- non–antigen-specifc responses possibly leading to allergy, lenge. Currently available vaccines have largely been devel- autoimmunity, or even premature death—are being raised. oped empirically, with little or no understanding of how they Certain “off-targets effects” of vaccines have also been recog- activate the immune system. Their early protective effcacy is nized and call for studies to quantify their impact and identify primarily conferred by the induction of antigen-specifc anti- the mechanisms at play. The objective of this chapter is to bodies (Box 2.1). However, there is more to antibody- extract from the complex and rapidly evolving feld of immu- mediated protection than the peak of vaccine-induced nology the main concepts that are useful to better address antibody titers. The quality of such antibodies (e.g., their these important questions. avidity, specifcity, or neutralizing capacity) has been identi- fed as a determining factor in effcacy. Long-term protection HOW DO VACCINES MEDIATE PROTECTION? requires the persistence of vaccine antibodies above protective thresholds and/or the maintenance of immune memory cells Vaccines protect by inducing effector mechanisms (cells or capable of rapid and effective reactivation with subsequent molecules) capable of rapidly controlling replicating patho- microbial exposure. The determinants of immune memory gens or inactivating their toxic components. Vaccine-induced induction, as well as the relative contribution of persisting immune effectors (Table 2.1) are essentially antibodies— antibodies and of immune memory to protection against spe- produced by B lymphocytes—capable of binding specifcally cifc diseases, are essential parameters of long-term vaccine to a toxin or a pathogen.2 Other potential effectors are cyto- effcacy.
    [Show full text]