DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Plant ID & Natives.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Plant ID & Natives.Pdf Slide 1 ___________________________________ NAMING, PLANT IDENTIFICATION ___________________________________ and NATIVE PLANTS for ___________________________________ Master Gardeners Naming conventions, how to use keys, and an intro to local natives ___________________________________ 1 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 2 ___________________________________ Class objectives: By the end of this session, participants will be able to: • Describe the Latin and common naming systems, ___________________________________ how they are used, and why they are important for gardeners and ecologists. • Demonstrate how to use a dichotomous key to identify a plant. ___________________________________ • Define the concept of “nativeness” and place it in the context of gardening and local ecology. • Describe the ecology and identifying characters for 3 or more locally native plants. ___________________________________ 2 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 3 ___________________________________ Latin and Common Names • Most plants have both ___________________________________ • Ideally, each plant has ONE of each • Good to learn both • Latin names good for specificity ___________________________________ • Common names good for simple communication ___________________________________ 3 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 4 ___________________________________ Latin (or Scientific) Names • Classifying and naming brings order to chaos • Carl von Linne “invented” the system in 1700s ___________________________________ • Linneas, Linnean taxonomy: Latin binomial • Names sometimes change, but binomial naming system is useful and survives intact ___________________________________ • Historic classification was based on appearance • Modern classification is DNA (evolution)-based • “Who is most closely related to who” ___________________________________ 4 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 5 ___________________________________ Classification of plants • Highest classification tiers separate plants from other basic life forms ___________________________________ • Higher plant tiers separate algae, mosses, spore- vs. seed-bearing plants, etc. • Int’l. Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (2011) ___________________________________ • Classifications based mostly on flower and seed parts (reproduction) • Lowest tiers = most relevant to us: Family, Genus, species (ssp. or subsp.; var.; etc.) ___________________________________ 5 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 6 ___________________________________ Families • No easy rule defines what is a “family;” just remember that they have similar flowers and ___________________________________ seeds, often other similarities • Each family is named for a genus within it • Example: Berberis (the genus) is the “root” of ___________________________________ the Berberidaceae Family. Brassica, the root of the Mustard Family, Brassicaceae. • All plant families end in –aceae ___________________________________ 6 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 7 ___________________________________ Important garden vegetable families (1) • Amaryllidaceae (Amaryllis Family; onion, garlic) • Apiaceae (Carrot Family; carrot, parsley) ___________________________________ • Asteraceae (Aster Family; lettuce) • Brassicaceae (Mustard Family; broccoli, cauliflower, kale, cabbage, arugula, mustard ___________________________________ greens, radish) • Chenopodiaceae (Goosefoot Family; spinach, chard, beet) ___________________________________ 7 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 8 ___________________________________ Important garden vegetable families (2) • Cucurbitaceae (Cucumber Family; ___________________________________ cucumber, squash, melon) • Fabaceae (Bean Family; pea, bean) • Poaceae (Grass Family; corn) ___________________________________ • Solanaceae (Nightshade Family; tomato, potato, pepper, eggplant) ___________________________________ 8 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 9 ___________________________________ Binomial system: basic conventions • Latin used as “the language of science” ___________________________________ • Genus + species = the Latin name or binomial • Latin words often translate to English to a plant feature or habitat or an associated ___________________________________ person’s name • Pronunciation varies ___________________________________ 9 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 10 ___________________________________ Binomial system: basic conventions • Genus (pl. genera) always capitalized: Acer • Species epithet lower case: Acer macrophyllum ___________________________________ • Often there is another sub-category: • Subspecies = ssp. (or subsp.) • Variety = var. (also a “common” definition) • Cultivar = cultivated variety (overlap in Latin ___________________________________ and common naming with this term); horticultural • Genus, species, ssp./var. name always italicized; cultivar name not italicized ___________________________________ 10 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 11 ___________________________________ Binomial system: basic conventions • If genus known, but species not, use “sp.”: e.g. Berberis sp. (singular) ___________________________________ • Several species of a genus: Berberis spp. (plural) • Occasionally: - A genus moved to different family - 2 species “lumped” to 1, or 1 “split” into 2 ___________________________________ • “Professional disagreement” can result in two names for the same plant • We still are learning! • Plants still are evolving! ___________________________________ 11 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 12 How is a “new” species named? ___________________________________ • New genus or species: “type” voucher collection; name & description published under Rules • OSU houses an “herbarium;” LCC a small one ___________________________________ • Describer becomes “author” (“authority”) of that sp.; written after the name (usually abbreviated) • E.g., L. (abbreviation for Linnaeus) • Writing the authority is optional ___________________________________ • Rules complicated; best to follow a good Oregon source (e.g., the Oregon Flora Project) • New cultivar? A separate rule set. ___________________________________ 12 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 13 ___________________________________ Common names • No governing rules or authorities • May be more than one for a species or ssp. ___________________________________ • One name may be applied to several species • Often relates to Latin binomial: Bigleaf Maple = Acer macrophyllum • Sometimes quite different: Pseudotsuga menziesii ___________________________________ would be Menzies’ False Hemlock, but instead is Douglas-fir • Capitalization optional: Bigleaf Maple = Bigleaf maple = bigleaf maple ___________________________________ 13 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 14 ___________________________________ Plant breeding • Results in new hybrids and cultivars • Patents often applied for ___________________________________ • Also has international rulebook for naming: ICNCP (2009) • Most ornamentals and vegetables are bred by selecting, hybridizing or genetic manipulation ___________________________________ • Cultivar name comes after Latin binomial in single quote marks: Acer macrophyllum ‘Diane’s Special’ • Hybrids may have an X in the name ___________________________________ 14 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 15 ___________________________________ In conclusion • Most every plant has a Latin name AND a common name ___________________________________ • Latin names = scientific, specific • Common names = easy public use • Both have drawbacks; generally, Latin ___________________________________ binomial is more unique to a plant and understandable around the world ___________________________________ 15 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 16 ___________________________________ Let’s look at the catalog… ___________________________________ 1. Stretch break 2. Look at catalog, focus on names ___________________________________ 3. Reconvene, ask questions, review catalog together ___________________________________ 16 ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ Slide 17 ___________________________________ USING KEYS! • Literal meaning: the key! • A way to find out what an unknown plant is, using someone else’s tool made for that purpose ___________________________________ • Dichotomous = two ways;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In North America Author(S): Chia Jui Chen, Meghan G. Mendenhall and Billie L
    Taxonomy of Thermopsis (Fabaceae) in North America Author(s): Chia Jui Chen, Meghan G. Mendenhall and Billie L. Turner Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 81, No. 4 (1994), pp. 714-742 Published by: Missouri Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2399917 Accessed: 18-06-2015 19:07 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Missouri Botanical Garden Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.83.205.78 on Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:07:36 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions TAXONOMYOF THERMOPSIS Chia JuiChen,2 Meghan G. Mendenhall,3 (FABACEAE) IN NORTH and Billie L. Turner4 AMERICA' ABSTRACT Comprehensive reevaluation of both herbarium specimens and fieldobservations of the North American Thermopsis leads to our recognition of 10 species. Three species occur in the southern Appalachians: T. villosa, T. mollis, and T fraxinifolia. The Rocky Mountains and intermountainregions are populated by the relativelyvariable and widespread species T. divaricarpa, T. montana, and T rhombifolia. The Pacific coastal mountains of California are dominated by the variable T californica (with three infraspecifictaxa), which gives way to T gracilis in northern California and western Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • FARKLI Thermopsis Turcica EKSTRELERĠNĠN Hepg2
    FARKLI Thermopsis turcica EKSTRELERĠNĠN HepG2 HÜCRE HATLARINDA ANTĠKANSER, SĠTOTOKSĠK, GENOTOKSĠK MEKANĠZMALARININ GEN EKSPRESYON ANALĠZLERĠ YÖNTEMĠYLE DEĞERLENDĠRĠLMESĠ DOKTORA TEZĠ Muhammad MUDDASSĠR ALĠ DanıĢman Doç. Dr. Ġbrahim Hakkı CĠĞERCĠ MOLEKÜLER BĠYOLOJĠ VE GENETĠK ANABĠLĠM DALI Temmuz, 2017 AFYON KOCATEPE ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ FEN BĠLĠMLERĠ ENSTĠTÜSÜ DOKTORA TEZĠ FARKLI Thermopsis turcica EKSTRELERĠNĠN HepG2 HÜCRE HATLARINDA ANTĠKANSER, SĠTOTOKSĠK, GENOTOKSĠK MEKANĠZMALARININ GEN EKSPRESYON ANALĠZLERĠ YÖNTEMĠYLE DEĞERLENDĠRĠLMESĠ Muhammad MUDDASSĠR ALĠ DanıĢman Doç. Dr. Ġbrahim Hakkı CĠĞERCĠ MOLEKÜLER BĠYOLOJĠ VE GENETĠKANABĠLĠM DALI Temmuz, 2017 BĠLĠMSEL ETĠK BĠLDĠRĠM SAYFASI Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırladığım bu tez çalıĢmasında; Tez içindeki bütün bilgi ve belgeleri akademik kurallar çerçevesinde elde ettiğimi, Görsel, iĢitsel ve yazılı tüm bilgi ve sonuçları bilimsel ahlak kurallarına uygun olarak sunduğumu, BaĢkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda ilgili eserlere bilimsel normlara uygun olarak atıfta bulunduğumu, Atıfta bulunduğum eserlerin tümünü kaynak olarak gösterdiğimi, Kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapmadığımı, Ve bu tezin herhangi bir bölümünü bu üniversite veya baĢka bir üniversitede baĢka bir tez çalıĢması olarak sunmadığımı beyan ederim. 11/07/2017 Muhammad Muddassir ALĠ ÖZET Doktora Tezi FARKLI Thermopsis turcica EKSTRELERĠNĠN HepG2 HÜCRE HATLARINDA ANTĠKANSER, SĠTOTOKSĠK, GENOTOKSĠK MEKANĠZMALARININ GEN EKSPRESYON ANALĠZLERĠ
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnobotany of the Yurok, Tolowa, and Karok Indians of Northwest California
    THE ETHNOBOTANY OF THE YUROK, TOLOWA, AND KAROK INDIANS OF NORTHWEST CALIFORNIA by Marc Andre Baker 'A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts June, 1981 THE ETHNOBOTANY OF THE YUROK, TOLOWA, AND KAROK INDIANS OF NORTHWEST CALIFORNIA by Marc A. Baker Approved by the Master's Thesis Corrunittee V~+J~.Jr, Chairman ~;'J.~''c \. (l .:, r---- (I'. J~!-\ Approved by the Graduate Dean ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS An ethnobotanical study necessitates the cooperation of individuals who among themselves have a wide range of diverse interests. Dr. James Payne Smith, Jr., Professor of Botany was the chief coordinator of this unity as well as my princi- pal advisor and editor. Most of the botanical related prob- lems and many grammatical questions were discussed with him. Torn Nelson, Herbarium Assistant of the HSU Herbarium, aided in the identification of many plant specimens. Dr. Jim Waters, Professor of Zoology, dealt with cor- rections concerning his field, and discerningly and meticu- lously proofread the entire text. From the formal field of ethnology, Dr. Pat Wenger, Professor of Anthropolo~y, worked with me on problems in linguistics, phonetics, and other aspects of ethnography. He also discussed with me many definitions, theories, and atti- tudes of modern ethnologists. The field work would not have been possible without the help of Torn Parsons, Director of the Center for Community Development, Arcata, California. Mr. Parsons has been work- ing with the Tolowa, Karok, and Yurok for many years and was able to introduce me to reliable and authentic sources of cultural information.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Flowering Plants of the Rough & Ready Creek Watershed List
    FERNS & FERN ALLIES: DENNSTAEDTIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY 1. Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Western Bracken Fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE WOOD FERN FAMILY Flowering Plants of the Rough & Ready Creek 2. Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricated or Narrow-leaved Sword Fern —Feb. 2015 revision of nomenclature based on the Watershed 3. Polystichum munitum Common Swordfern most current, third, Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG3) treatment of classification. Previously used names shown in EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY (parenthesizes). 4. Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush This plant list was originally a compilation of a variety of Rough and Ready area plant lists--compiled by Karen Phillips and Wendell Wood. Lists include POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY species contained in Barbara Ullian's "Preliminary Flora - Rough & Ready Creek" 5. Polypodium glycyrrhiza Licorice Fern (1994) which includes species recorded by Mary Paetzel and Mike Anderson. Other Rough and Ready lists were previously contributed by Veva Stansell, PTERIDACEAE BRAKE FAMILY Robin Taylor-Davenport and Jill Pade. Additionally, species were added as 6. Adiantum aleuticum (pedatum) Five-fingered Fern or Maidenhair Fern contained on The Nature Conservancy preserve’s 2007 list, and species identified in 2008-2009 for the Medford Dist. BLM’s Rough and Ready 7. Aspidotis densa Indian’s Dream ACEC by botanical contractors: Scot Loring, Josh Paque and Pete Kaplowe. 8. Pentagramma triangularis ssp. triangularis Goldback Fern Finally, Wendell Wood has added additional species he has personally found and identified in the Rough and Ready watershed prior to 2015. GYMNOSPERMS: CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY A few species on previous lists are shown separately after the end of this list, if they are not shown as occurring in Josephine Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment Biological Resources Assessment City of Shasta Lake Wastewater Treatment Facility Upgrade
    APPENDIX D BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT CITY OF SHASTA LAKE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPGRADE NOVEMBER 2014 PREPARED FOR: City of Shasta Lake 1650 Stanton Drive Shasta Lake, CA 96019 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT CITY OF SHASTA LAKE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY UPGRADE NOVEMBER 2014 PREPARED FOR: City of Shasta Lake 1650 Stanton Drive Shasta Lake, CA 96019 PREPARED BY: Analytical Environmental Services 1801 7th Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95811 (916) 447-3479 www.analyticalcorp.com TABLE OF CONTENTS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY OF SHASTA LAKE WWTF UPGRADE PROJECT 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Location and Description ................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Regulatory Overview ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Federal ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 State ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.3 Local ............................................................................................................................................ 8 3.0 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Propagation Protocol for Thermopsis Gracilis ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Spring 2015 Thermopolis Gracilis Howell
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Thermopsis gracilis ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Spring 2015 Thermopolis gracilis Howell (THGR6) (PLANTS) Thermopsis gracilis Howell var. gracilis (PLANTS) Thermopsis gracilis Howell var. ovata (PLANTS) TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Fabaceae Common Name Legume Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Thermopsis gracilis Howell Varieties Thermopsis gracilis Howell var. gracilis (THGRG) Thermopsis gracilis Howell var. ovata (THGRO) Thermopsis gracilis Howell var. venosa (THGRV) (PLANTS) Sub-species Cultivar Common Synonym(s) Slender False Lupine; Big Leaf Thermopolis; Golden Pea (Thermopsis gracilis var. ovata); Mountain Goldenbanner (Thermopsis Montana var. ovata) (ITIS) Common Name(s) Slender Goldenbanner Species Code (as per USDA Plants THGR6 database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range (distribution Native to the West Coast of North America. maps for North America and Specifically Klamath Mountain ranges, North Coast Washington state) Mountain ranges, Cascade Mountain range and Western Oregon. See above for range maps. Ecological distribution Roadsides, chaparral, cismontane woodland, lower montane coniferous forest, meadows and seeps, North Coast coniferous forest (CNPS) Climate and elevation range 510-1150 m (Calflora) Local habitat and abundance Colonizes open sites. Considered rare; rare plant program ranking of 4.3 (CNPS). Plant strategy type / successional Rhizomatous, drought tolerant, plant is attractive to stage bees, butterflies, and pollen-consuming birds (Dave’s Garden). Plant characteristics Perennial herb (Calflora) Green herb with leaflets 3-7 cm long and inflorescence 12-20 cm long. Flowers 1-2 per node, fruit is straight and spreading with seeds inside fruit pod (Jepson Flora Project). PROPAGATION DETAILS Ecotype Propagation Goal Plants Propagation Method Seed Product Type Seed Stock Type Time to Grow Time to germinate: 2-4 weeks (Ravenscroft), 4 months to out plant (Skinner).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants
    Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants June 1, 2011 By Scott Mincemoyer Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT This checklist of Montana vascular plants is organized by Division, Class and Family. Species are listed alphabetically within this hierarchy. Synonyms, if any, are listed below each species and are slightly indented from the main species list. The list is generally composed of species which have been documented in the state and are vouchered by a specimen collection deposited at a recognized herbaria. Additionally, some species are included on the list based on their presence in the state being reported in published and unpublished botanical literature or through data submitted to MTNHP. The checklist is made possible by the contributions of numerous botanists, natural resource professionals and plant enthusiasts throughout Montana’s history. Recent work by Peter Lesica on a revised Flora of Montana (Lesica 2011) has been invaluable for compiling this checklist as has Lavin and Seibert’s “Grasses of Montana” (2011). Additionally, published volumes of the Flora of North America (FNA 1993+) have also proved very beneficial during this process. The taxonomy and nomenclature used in this checklist relies heavily on these previously mentioned resources, but does not strictly follow anyone of them. The Checklist of Montana Vascular Plants can be viewed or downloaded from the Montana Natural Heritage Program’s website at: http://mtnhp.org/plants/default.asp This publication will be updated periodically with more frequent revisions anticipated initially due to the need for further review of the taxonomy and nomenclature of particular taxonomic groups (e.g. Arabis s.l ., Crataegus , Physaria ) and the need to clarify the presence or absence in the state of some species.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico Robert C
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Occasional Papers Museum of Southwestern Biology 2-12-2007 Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico Robert C. Sivinski Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/occasionalpapers Recommended Citation Sivinski, Robert C.. "Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/occasionalpapers/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum of Southwestern Biology at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OCCASIONAL PAPERS OF THE MUSEUM OF SOUTHWESTERN BIOLOGY NUMBER 10, pp. 1–67 12 February 2007 Checklist of Vascular Plants in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains of Central New Mexico ROBERT C. SIVINSKI1 ABSTRACT The flora of the central New Mexico range of mountains consisting of the Sandia, Manzanita and Manzano mountains is predominantly influenced by the southern Rocky Mountain regional flora, but also contains floristic elements from the adjacent Chihuahuan Desert, Great Plains and Colorado Plateau ecoregions. This vascular plant checklist documents 100 families, 454 genera, 798 native species, 108 exotic species, and 31 additional native infraspecific taxa for a total of 937 kinds of plants in the Sandia/Manzano range of mountains. Discussions of the local environment and climate, common plant associations, endemic and rare plants, exotic species, and plant collection history in this mountain range are included. INTRODUCTION The Sandia and Manzano range of mountains is the All of the common plants, and most of the uncommon most striking topographic feature of central New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List Was Originally a Compilation of a Variety of Rough and Ready Area Plant Lists--Compiled by Karen Phillips and Wendell Wood
    FERNS & FERN ALLIES: DENNSTAEDTIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY 1. Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Western Bracken Fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE WOOD FERN FAMILY Flowering Plants of the Rough & Ready Creek 2. Polystichum imbricans ssp. imbricans Imbricated or Narrow-leaved Sword Fern —Feb. 2015 revision of nomenclature based on the Watershed 3. Polystichum munitum Common Swordfern most current, third, Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG3) treatment of classification. Previously used names shown in EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY (parenthesizes). 4. Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush This plant list was originally a compilation of a variety of Rough and Ready area plant lists--compiled by Karen Phillips and Wendell Wood. Lists include POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY species contained in Barbara Ullian's "Preliminary Flora - Rough & Ready Creek" 5. Polypodium glycyrrhiza Licorice Fern (1994) which includes species recorded by Mary Paetzel and Mike Anderson. Other Rough and Ready lists were previously contributed by Veva Stansell, PTERIDACEAE BRAKE FAMILY Robin Taylor-Davenport and Jill Pade. Additionally, species were added as 6. Adiantum aleuticum (pedatum) Five-fingered Fern or Maidenhair Fern contained on The Nature Conservancy preserve’s 2007 list, and species identified in 2008-2009 for the Medford Dist. BLM’s Rough and Ready 7. Aspidotis densa Indian’s Dream ACEC by botanical contractors: Scot Loring, Josh Paque and Pete Kaplowe. 8. Pentagramma triangularis ssp. triangularis Goldback Fern Finally, Wendell Wood has added additional species he has personally found and identified in the Rough and Ready watershed prior to 2015. GYMNOSPERMS: CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY A few species on previous lists are shown separately after the end of this list, if they are not shown as occurring in Josephine Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Year End Report for the 2019 Botanical Survey Season
    Year End Report for the 2019 Botanical Survey Season March 2020 Cover photo (clockwise from top left): Gentiana afinis var. ovata, Diplacus sp., Pyrola picta, Anthoxanthum occidentale Photo credit (clockwise from top left): Kolby Lundgren, Tristan Cole, Kolby Lundgren, Scott Whittington Year End Report for the 2019 Botanical Survey Season 2 Year End Report for the 2019 Botanical Survey Season Prepared for: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Northern Region, Timberland Conservation Planning Prepared by: CONSERVATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT Keith Hamm, Department Manager Gabe Cashman, Botany Supervisor David Lamphear, Research Analyst 2019 Botanical Survey Crew Tristan Cole, Botanist II Kolby Lundgren, Botanist I Alexandria Fletcher, Resource Technician (Botany/Forestry) Scott Whittington, Resource Technician (Botany/Forestry) Stephanie Smith, Resource Technician (Botany/IFM-Nursery) Elyna Grapstein, Seasonal Botany Technician Year End Report for the 2019 Botanical Survey Season 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6 RESULTS OF SPECIAL STATUS NATIVE PLANT POPULATIONS SURVEYS ..................................................................... 8 Rare Species - California Rare Plant Rank (CRPR) 1 and 2 Detections in 2019 ........................................................ 8 Uncommon Species – California Rare Plant Rank 3 and 4 Detections in 2019 ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WTU Herbarium Specimen Label Data
    WTU Herbarium Specimen Label Data Generated from the WTU Herbarium Database September 24, 2021 at 12:18 pm http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/collections/search.php Specimen records: 163 Images: 16 Search Parameters: Label Query: Genus = "Thermopsis" Fabaceae Fabaceae Thermopsis montana Nutt. var. ovata (B.L. Rob. ex Piper) Thermopsis montana Nutt. var. ovata (B.L. Rob. ex Piper) H. St. John H. St. John U.S.A., WASHINGTON, GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: U.S.A., WASHINGTON, WALLA WALLA COUNTY: Between Cosmopolis and Raymond. 2 miles south of Walla Walla. 46.95556°, -123.7725°; WGS 84, uncertainty: 10000 m., Source: 46.035763°, -118.34194°; WGS 84, uncertainty: 1000 m., Source: GeoLocate, Georef'd by WTU Staff GeoLocate, Georef'd by WTU Staff Flowers yellow. Phenology: Flowers & Fruits. Origin: Native. Along overflow channel of stream. Phenology: Flowers & Fruits. Origin: Native. I. C. Otis 2067 30 May 1936 C. L. Hitchcock 8274 24 May 1944 WTU-54985 with C. V. Muhlick WTU-93016 Fabaceae Thermopsis montana Nutt. var. ovata (B.L. Rob. ex Piper) Fabaceae H. St. John Thermopsis montana Nutt. var. ovata (B.L. Rob. ex Piper) U.S.A., WASHINGTON, ASOTIN COUNTY: H. St. John Mouth of the Grande Ronde River, junction with Snake River. 46.067154°, -117.000983°; WGS 84, uncertainty: 10000 m., U.S.A., WASHINGTON, WHITMAN COUNTY: Source: GeoLocate, Georef'd by WTU Staff Pullman. Phenology: Flowers. Origin: Native. 46.73139°, -117.17861°; WGS 84, uncertainty: 1000 m., Source: Nat. Geog. TOPO!, Georef'd by John Bassett William H. Baker 13944 29 Apr 1956 Phenology: Fruits. Origin: Native.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rare Plant Rank Additions Date Abutilon Abutiloides - Added to CRPR 2B.1 5-Oct-2016 Acanthoscyphus Parishii Var
    Major Changes Implemented Since CNPS Inventory, 6th Edition (2001) Last Updated December 31, 2018 (note: changes newly accepted since October 1, 2018 are in orange text) California Rare Plant Rank Additions Date Abutilon abutiloides - Added to CRPR 2B.1 5-Oct-2016 Acanthoscyphus parishii var. parishii - Added to CRPR 4.2 9-Apr-2007 Adiantum shastense - Added to CRPR 4.3 18-Nov-2016 Agrostis lacuna-vernalis - Added to CRPR 1B.1 14-Jun-2012 Aliciella triodon - Added to CRPR 2B.2 4-Oct-2006 Allium abramsii - Added to CRPR 1B.2 13-Mar-2012 Allium howellii var. howellii - Added to CRPR 4.3 4-Apr-2017 Allium howellii var. sanbenitense - Added to CRPR 1B.3 4-Apr-2017 Allium punctum - Added to CRPR 2B.2 8-Sep-2009 Almutaster pauciflorus - Added to CRPR 2B.2 14-Mar-2017 Ambrosia monogyra - Added to CRPR 2B.2 21-Feb-2007 Amsinckia douglasiana - Added to CRPR 4.2 20-Aug-2007 Ancistrocarphus keilii - Added to CRPR 1B.1 1-Jan-2005 Anemone multifida var. multifida - Added to CRPR 2B.2 28-Aug-2017 Antennaria lanata - Added to CRPR 2B.2 1-Jan-2004 Antennaria sawyeri - Added to CRPR 1B.2 29-Oct-2015 Arctostaphylos gabilanensis - Added to CRPR 1B.2 1-Jan-2005 Arctostaphylos ohloneana - Added to CRPR 1B.1 2-Apr-2009 Arctostaphylos pacifica - Added to CRPR 1B.2 15-Mar-2007 Artemisia tripartita ssp. tripartita - Added to CRPR 2B.3 20-Aug-2012 Astragalus austiniae - Added to CRPR 1B.3 4-Dec-2013 Astragalus bernardinus - Added to CRPR 1B.2 17-Feb-2011 Astragalus hornii var.
    [Show full text]