than tion the Glycol taining tion. numerous of Glycol Glycol animals. patch T ingredients
structural palmitic
which
skin
acid.
hese
Glycol Animal
Subchronic
mono- Based
show
Assessment
0.1
test
Stearate,
Stearate,
Distearate
Glycol R1
irritation
ingredients acid,
The
to
Human
formula
Final
is
with
categories
on
that
Stearate:
in
10%.
data
and
the
Glycol
latter
along
the Stearate
the
50%
these
Glycol Glycol
acyl
testing
test
for
or
diesters
CHEMICAL should
available
for
present
consists
are Glycol
with
hypersensitivity.
Glycol
The acute data of
portion
these
ingredients
Report
at
Stearate Stearate
mixed
cosmetic
has
lesser
levels
ingredient
be
for
of
practices
of
oral
ingredients information
Distearate
considered. Stearate
not
formulations
of 42.5
triple-pressed
esters
AND
amounts
of
of
toxicity,
SE,
SE,
triple-pressed
products
been
2—5%
Io H2C-O-R1 H2C-O-R
have
Distearate
is and
and
PHYSICAL of of
stearic
Human
Glycol
comprised
1
on
1 ethylene
on
use
is:’2
adequately
of
reported
low
Glycol
presented
skin Glycol
125
several
at
containing
and
acid
acute
stearic
concentrations
and
the
studies
stearic
subjects
PROPERTIES Distearate
concentration. glycol
Distearate
SE,
and
of
no
eye
other
herein,
40—70°!0
toxicity.
investigated
skin
about
acid.
Stearate,
acid using
irritation,
and >
Safety
presented
fatty
and
4%
irritation
triple-pressed are
consist
it
and
an
They
of
formulations
A
acids. Glycol
is
ranging
the safe
equal
repeated
concluded
R2
and
in
are
monoester
no
or primarily
is
as
The
Stearate
laboratory
amount
sensitiza
sensitiza from
H.
evidence
cosmetic
used
general
stearic
Glycol
insult
con
that
less
of
or
in
of
in ______
2 COSMETICINGREDIENTREVIEW ASSESSMENT:GLYCC
Stearate also contains a significant portion, 3O—58%,of the diester in which both TABLE1. 1R and 2R are the acyl moiety of triple-pressed stearic acid. t2 Cosmeticpro Ingred Glycol Stearate SE: This ingredient is a self-emulsifying grade of Glycol ‘ Stearate containing free stearic acid and some sodium and/or potassium GlycolStearate stearate. ‘> Bath oils, tabiet Bubble baths
Glycol Distearate: This ingredient is the diester of ethylene glycol in which Other bath prep both 1R and 2R are the acyl moiety of triple-pressed stearic acid. Eyebrowpencil SE, 2 Eyeliner Glycol Stearate, Glycol Stearate and Glycol Distearate have similar physical properties. They are white to cream colored waxy solids. Their physical Eyeshadow properties vary within specified limits according to their proportions of mono- Mascara and diesters and other components. Depending on the intended use, a purchas- Hair conditione ing specification is used to set specific limits on the physical characteristics of Hair straightene these ingredients. Rinses (noncolo Shampoos (nom 2 Analytical Methods
Glycol Stearate and Glycol Distearate can be analyzed by gas chromatog- Tonics, dressing raphy. Mass spectrometric analysis of long-chain esters of ethanediol (ethylene hair grooming glycol)3 has been described this allows for the identification of individual esters Hair shampoos of the diol as well as of classes of diol monoesters. A method of gel-permeation Blushers (alltyp 4 Foundations chromatography for Glycol Distearate on Sephadex LH-20 has also been Lipsticks reported. Standard methods have been suggested for determining the ; Makeup bases chemical5 properties of these ingredients. Rouges Other makeup > Bath soaps and 2 Impurities Impurities such as free stearic acid (triple-pressed), the mono- or diesters, Aftershave Iotioi ethylene glycol, and corresponding derivatives of other fatty acids found in the Cleansing (cold stearic acid may be present in Glycol Stearate. cleansing lotic and pads) Ethylene glycol and/or ethylene oxide are used as starting material for the 2> Face, body and synthesis of Glycol Stearate. Since the former is known to be contaminated with (excluding sh traces of 1,4-dioxane, it is possible that such traces also appear in the synthesized preparations) material. >Analytical data on traces of 1,4-dioxane in Glycol Stearate were not Moisturizing available6to the Expert Panel. (.i.O%) When rats were given high doses of 1,4-dioxane in drinking water Other skin care for 13 months, liver lesions including hepatomas occurred.
7 Suntan gels, cre USE liquids
GIycolStearate Purpose and Frequency of Use in Cosmetics Other skin care as These ingredients are used emulsifiers, dispersants, opacifiers, and viscosity Glycol Distearat modifiers. As wax ingredients in stick preparations, they have served to control Hair conditione hardness, add slip, and increase opacity. They give lotion, cream, and detergent . Permanent way formulations an opaque or milky appearance. Shampoos (non’ As shown in Table 1, these ingredients are used in a variety of categories of t8 Hair dyes and c cosmetic products; their concentrations range from less than 0.1% to as high as 9 types requirin 10%. The cosmetic product formulation’ computer printout which is made statement and col have Irting variety ietics d near be ie H-20 han )pacifiers, )fl ethanediol Hester ‘lene
ing : solids. for tty tearate inking (2) d od nded ntout cal roportions acid. cream, (7) INGREDIENT and/or by of mono- contaminated acids of Stearate characteristics grade O.1% in determining individual served glycol gas use, material has gel-permeation 2) in the which Their water of have and which found chromatog categories and to or synthesized potassium a of also of in (ethylene purchas to were physical as detergent REVIEW (.— diesters, Glycol viscosity similar mono is which for control high esters both in 1 been made with .001o) the the the not of of as ASSESSMENT: TABLE Glycol Other Mascara Tonics, Shampoos Eyeshadow Bath Bubble Rinses Eyeliner Eyebrow Hair Hair Other Cleansing Aftershave Makeup Foundations Blushers Hair Lipsticks Ro Moisturizing Other Face, Bath Clycol Glycol Suntan Other Shampoos Permanent Hair Hair hair and cleansing (excluding preparations) types liquids statement Cosmetic u ges conditioners oils, straighteners shampoos soaps conditioners dyes body bath grooming pads) makeup Stearate skin (noncoloring) skin Stearate Distearate baths GLYCOI dressings, gels, 1. requiring bases (all pencil Ingredient tablets (cold and (noncoloririg) lotions preparations (noncoloring) care and care waves and product lotions, Product types) and creams, shaving colors preparations (coloring) SE detergents creams, hand preparations preparations aids and patch caution and STEARATE, liquids, type! salts and Formulation (all other test) GLYCOL Data.a STEARATE Concentration >0.1—1 >0.1—1 >0.1-1 >0.1—1 >0.1-1 >0.1—1 >0.1-1 >0.1-1 >0.1-1 >0.1—1 >0.1-1 >0.1—1 >0.1—1 >0.1—1 >0.1—1 >1-5 >1-5 >5—10 >5-10 >1-5 >1-5 >5-10 >1-5 >5-10 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 0.1 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 >5—10 >1-5 >1-5 >5—10 (%) >1-5 >1-5 >1-5 SE, AND GLYCOL DISTEARATE No. formulations of 44 46 75 28 88 product 4 6 3 6 2 9 3 2 3 2 8 5 2 2 2 3 8 5 2 9 2 3 2 9 5 6 4 COSMETIC INGREDIENT REVIEW ASSESSMENT:GLYC(
TABLE1. (Continued.)
Cosmetic product type/ Concentration No. of product Ingredient (%) formulations Oral Toxicity: I for five studies Deodorants (underarm) >1—5 1 in
Other personal cleanliness >5—10 1 marized in Table products in corn oil 3 weight Other shaving preparation >1—5 1 nasal hemorrhag products ministration, but Cleansing (cold creams, > 1—5 1 cleansing lotions, liquids, with high levels 01 and pads) 14-day gross a 4 the the test material.t aData from Ref. 10. For 91 days, five females, werE available by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)is compiled through volun dients was ethyl€ tary filing of such data in accordance with Title 21 part 720.4 of the Code of and 5%. The eq Federal Regulations (1979). Ingredients are listed in prescribed concentration 0.0025—0.0125%, ranges under specific product type categories. Since certain cosmetic ingredients histopathologic e: are supplied by the manufacturer at less than %100 concentration, the value and test groups. reported by the cosmetic formulator may not necessarily reflect the true, effective concentration found in the finished product; the effective concentration in such Primary Skin a a case would be fraction of that reported to the FDA. The fact that data are only Glycol Stearate, C submitted within the framework of preset concentration ranges also provides the albino rabbit skit opportunity for overestimation of the actual concentration of an ingredient in a ritating (See TabI particular product. An entry at the lowest end of a concentration range is con were tested for cc sidered the same as one entered at the highest end of that range, thus introducing Transportation, t’ the possibility of a two- to ten-fold error in the assumed ingredient concentration. According to FDA, Glycol Stearate SEis used in one unspecified skin-care prod Sensitization uct. Glycol Distearate is principally employed in hair-care preparations Stearate and Gly its t10 however, use as a lyophilic component of self-emulsifying ointment bases has the shaven back been described.” ml injection, 0.1 Products containing these ingredients are used on all body orifices. Thus jections. Two w they may1 enter the body by several routes (though the inhalation of sprays ap ; taken 24 hours I pears to be minor as a mode of exposure and absorption). These ingredients may be applied as often as several times a day (lipsticks and Subch ron ic: lotions) or as infrequently as once every one or two months (hair dyes and mulation was ap colors). The period of time for which they remain in contact may be conditioned female rats. Obs by the frequency with which the affected part of the body is washed. behavior, hema histopathologic BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES of the test formL A shampoo General Effects separate experir three females). i The addition of 12.5 percent Glycol Stearate as a surfactant to a vaseline male and five fer based ointment increased the cutaneous absorption of the following compounds per week to inta through the shaved skin of rats by the factors shown: 10% potassium iodide (4X); this remained ot 5% sodium salicylate (4.6X);and 5% ammonium thiocyanate (3.1X).A two-gram Two formul sample of each emulsion was rubbed into the skin for five minutes and then Distearate appliE covered with a protective bandage. Absorption was determined by the analysis treatment-jnduc( of urine specimens collected at 12 and 24 2hours.” was reported to irfactant ,onths nes LII •care ecified ange, flect icentration, ;cribed IC thalation i npiled redient
ct nges concentration 720.4 five i rmined ng y
ntration ate
potassium fact
following
cosmetic
of
INGREDIENT
is
may
body
ointment
a
No.
(3.1X).
an
washed.
the that
minutes
form
also
day
thus
preparations10;
of
through
skin-care
of
be
ingredient concentration. (hair
concentration
by
true,
ulations
orifices.
to data range product
the
of (lipsticks
provides
conditioned
introducing
compounds ingredients
A the
iodide
a
sprays the
bases
dyes
two-gram
Code effective and
are vaseline REVIEW
in
analysis
volun
is
value
prod
such
Thus only con
then (4X); in
and
and
the
has
ap
of
a
I
ASSESSMENT:
weight the in with marized the nasal ministration, five dients 0.0025—0.01 and
and histopathologic
Glycol albino
Transportation, were ritating
the
jections. Stearate
taken ml
female
mulation behavior, of treatment-induced three separate histopathologic was this male Distearate per
five
Oral test 14-day
the
injection, females,
For
shaven Primary
test 5%.
high Sensitization:
Subchronic: week Two A
remained
tested
reported
hemorrhage;
studies
was and
in
24
females).
Stearate,
rabbit
test
shampoo 91
material.13
(See
rats. in
groups.’41 Toxicity:
The
and corn
levels
Two
hours
experiments was
formulations gross
to days,
five Table
ethylene GLYCOL
formulation.13
applied back
for
25%, hematology,
were
but Table
Observations Skin
intact for
0.1 equivalent Glycol
skin;
oil
applied
to
female weeks
corrosivity of
on examination,
they autopsy,
Glycol
four later.
A disappeared
changes. acute
of
2.
ml
produced
corn be formulation
fed
Irritation 0.005—0.025%,
For Glycol
STEARATE, the
fourth 2).
the or Sensitization
each
the
systemic to During
injections
glycol
similar
Distearate. were groups
a
abraded
later Both
rabbits 90
In oil
the animal five
oral
Stearate diet on ingredients
were
symptoms
dosing of
the
addition,
days, Stearate
alone.
clinical according experiment
No
were
found
animals
groups times
two
distearate toxicity a the
ingredients containing effects
Studies: to
of GLYCOL
stomach effects
no
Animal
challenge
within per
tested effects for
containing were
skin
that
weanling
various
Glycol
SE, male,
differences levels made studies
One
Each
a
to group.
seven
and
and
which
containing week
chemistry,
when were and
equivalent
ranged
in
produced
was appeared
given
STEARATE be
to
the
were
for
study
Draize Toxicology
white
at contained
ingredient
rats;
for
involved of Glycol
a Stearate
the
0.01
were
studies, Glycol
noncorrosive were
injection observed.
hours
dishwashing a
The
next for
found
rats,
91 the
included
Glycol
survival,
three Glycol
concentration
the
procedures from attributed
on
were
—0.05%.
guinea
13
type days.
found
conducted material
ethylene
SE,
each six
Distearate
by
to
Glycol six within
data each Distearate
organ
weeks at
to
doses times
similar
AND 0.05%
residues
was
1 observed
Stearate days.
other
was
Distearate
0% rabbits procedures 3%
The
be
diarrhea,
body
The
comprised
pigs.
from
to
day
GLYCOL Following
to to
liquid
injected Distearate
was a
of
nonirritating four of
in
to given,
weights, be of
glycol
skin
No
forms week
procedures, to
the concentration
rabbit the
in weight, Following
have
before
a these
the 13 the
for
which
range
each
nonsensitizing.13 and
applied
0.5%.
between
guinea liquid animals
days
irritation
one
skin or repeated
wet
primary
was U.S. DISTEARATE clipped
for distearate and
of
each
were
intradermally of Glycol
skin.u3)
studies
more
(three
washing.141
of
both reported appeared of
sham area appearance and oily
a
five
following No foundation
Department tested
pigs readings daily,
total
whose
between
an
to
were
been
the
used
but
that
irritation coats,
g!kg
evidence
backs males of
application
gross
poo.14
initial
Distearate slightly gross
are males on
of
often controls
were the
five
in had
tested that
resulted dosed
to
Glycol
ingre
body to
sum Glycol
were and
three of back; and
and
0.05
ad
test 1 into days
be and and
and for
five
at
% 0,
5
in ir of
of
15
of Table 2. Acute Animal Toxicity.a
Draize Woodard Eye LD5O—Acute oral Skin Irritation Calvary Irritation Draize File No. Rats! Irritation No. of Ingredient No. Value Conc. Dosage Dose Conc. Animals Index Conc. Rabbits Comment Glycol Stearate 6.4b.i >10 50% in 0.464—10 5 undiluted 6 rabbits 0.13 undiluted 6 mild transient g/kg corn oil g/kg irritant in 1/6 6.4b.ii >21.3 1:2 in 0.7—21.3 5 undiluted 6 rabbits 0.0 undiluted 9 no irritation g/kg corn oil g/kg 6.4b.ii IDept. of Transportation Skin Irritation Test] undiluted 6 rabbits 0.0 6.4b.iv >10 undiluted 10 10 undiluted 6 rabbits 0.375 g/kg g/kg 6.4b.iv [Skin Sensitization Test] i.c. inject. 2 guinea not a of 0.1% pigs sensitizer in saline 6.4b.v >5000 undiluted 5000 10 undiluted 3 rabbits 0.8 undiluted 3 practically non- mg/kg mg/kg Glycol Stearate SE 6.4d.i irritating 5% in 3 rabbits 0.0 5% in 3 not an irritant water water Glycol Distearate 6.4c.i >10 50°I in 0.464—10 5 undiluted 6 rabbits 0.04 undiluted 6 practically non g/kg corn oil g/kg irritating 6.4c.ii >16 1:4 in 0.5—16 5 undiluted 6 rabbits 0.0 undiluted 9 no irritation 0 g/kg corn oil g/kg CM 6.4c.ii [Dept. of Transportation Skin Irritation Test] undiluted 6 rabbits 0.0 ru 6.4c.iv >10 undiluted 10 10 undiluted 6 rabbits 0.085 g/kg g/kg 0 6.4c.iv [Skin Sensitization Test] z i.c. inject. 2 guinea not a C, of 0.1 % pigs sensitizer ru in saline 4.4c.v >5000 undiluted 5000 10 undiluted 3 rabbits 1.0 undiluted 3 practically non- ui mg/kg mg/kg z irritating -I aData from Ref. 14. ru
ui
0 rt. 0 fl • 0 —. (D o CM — Q• OD0O0 D fl• ( < o o - D . CM a;•c ?V (t ? ui )(D -(Dm -.‘(t--1 CM -Dm n— 0- ni — CM <. ti(D 0)t (D s-rD - (D - C 0 - ru = 0 Z C 00 © -. C —. — (D — - —. - D (D z — -< z- 0(D D 000)>0 D-+ z o3.(D —i. ‘-7’ CD —. ‘ox (D —. — D Vi —. —‘ ) _ • - D -D -* - < e D — n c_DO 0) -i.(D — —O DDCDD00--( C, C-’ 0 < < C 0 c X — D ô CD 0 0 00 -< 0 0 - . .m0tmt’CDCD =.z mn - ,- IC
-D
o o
A
1)
INGREDIENT
11)
1)
E biD
REVIEW
2
ASSESSMENT:
systemic microscopic Distearate associated by to Glycol tions report from observed centration. these
level. dients
to
Stearate, dicates which hydrolyzed released.
reviewed
from Glycol
hours final Challenge plied induction
observed hours.
quentially
Stearate),
the
the
4%, Two
A
A
Eye
Unpublished
Skin Potential
of
the (14)
separate
Eyeshadow three
insult
shampoo test.
noted
19 surfactant to to
to
Distearate
might
0.05% that
as
Distearate Irritation: toxic
No
formulations
the
the
be application
to the A
Irritation
in
U4) and
both
in ranged
an After
GLYCOL
blushing
patches
patch; period. ingredients review
by visible applied
it nonirritating 76 examination,
one no toxicity
same
dorsal
any be
effects.
Toxicity but
has
impurity.
and are
skin
years.
gross
containing formulations
four
expected ranged
rabbit
at subject;
Containing
clinical similar
the adverse
summarized
in
of
site The STEARATE,
0.3°I
skin
and from
were bacteria aspect
Each
eyeliner,
a
cream, of
According
the of
weeks,
mineral
were
sites
Patches necropsy
concentration
of
each
ethylene
for
Draize
Sensitization:
the changes from
at
In
to
extensive
Clinical or 28-day
applied
Impurities:
0.05°I data site
all
from
including
effects of irritating were
the
addition,
1—3%
10
practically tested test and
Monday, or
GLYCOI.
there
scores the
with
slight
oil eyeshadow
3.5%
was
containing
procedure animals
for
upon 0.05%
below.
to
cosmetics.
or
glycol
graded study compound.
mascara
characteristic was
upper
Assessment
to
only
to
Glycol
the
the
the literature microscopic
were
for
to
scored
rabbits’
were
STEARATE
Glycol
both
hematologic,
absorption, it
in
0.5%. performed
Wednesday,
In
severe.14 report,
reported
Glycol
A
must
at so. level development 28.days.
(five
is arm
for
the
any
no
repeated
dosage
Distearate was once
zero.’5 arms 0.25
(known possible
Table
sensitization
for
eyes.
Stearate:
systemic
of be male
on
and range
effort Slight
the
Following SE,
of Stearates
used
each
of
considered, g
a the of on
alterations” irritation
AND
2
Safety The
on
of levels skin day so
The in
and
irritation
each
insult
to gives
two
to
that of toxicity there and
to transient
sample
individual. that
was
most
125
GLYCOL
of
effects
contain
assess
for
concentration irritation
0.05—0.4%. results evaluate
five Fifty
formulations
and
much
subject
Friday
Glycol
details primary reactions
patch
ethylene complete
subjects
applied
30
a was
animals
female)
of
female
or in
for
total
were their the
or
days.
DISTEARATE
skin
showed
ethylene
the
3.5
higher
test sensitization
of no
this that
the
of deaths
Patches Stearate
14
safety
irritation.
the
products of at
after tissue
these applied ranging irritation
percent glycol
Approximately with evidence Investigators at
capacities days volunteers at is
was
gross
containing
concentra
of nine
present each than three-week
the
the
of
glycol resulting 48
were 50%
caused
studies.
Glycol
related
after
will
will
Glycol
ingre
and
0.3%
in for
those
times.
Glycol con
and
were The
was
were
w!v
of
age
up
be in be ap the of
24
96
se
after
tested
patches
preceding ethylene distearate,
shampoo.
patch after challenge
after
would
the
(Since
mulation
patch
testing.
tion
of
used.
duration tion
test
undiluted
Out
recorded.
irritation subjected
noted.
reported, imum
Glycol assay
any week
8
two-,
reported
one-half
Dermatological
the
Four
first
Formulations
the
Sixty-two was
Cream
Shampoo
challenge. the
Eyecolor
following
Eyeliner
indicative
of
potential
test
test
by
No
it
have
ingredient.
(Maibach
three-,
(14)
period.
were
three
The
was
final
individual
a
Stearate
final
dishwashing performed
glycol
was
of
means
was
was
study.
patch score
skin
of
672
so
It
formulation that
Twenty-two to
and
contained
Foundation
the
stated
average
was
the
induction
that
weeks,
applied
a induction
black
Containing
made
performed
and
performed
Cream
irritation
Containing
maximum
as
the
It
a
21-day
a
distearate.
No
of
of
study
at
subjects
No
of
test)
was
was
stated
examinations
cumulative
allergic challenge
the
An
Containing
the
that
5.94
induced
subject
four-week
products
evidence
on
the
males
along
an
evidence
mean
to
adaptation
diluted
concluded
liquids
applied
performed
was
0.005—0.0125%
Containing
insult
100
cumulative
the
containing
application,
was
application
was
or
repeated was
that Containing
the
were
on
total
sensitizers
3.5%
on
and
the
formulation
2—5%
not
insult
The
subjects,
value
value
the
sensitization.
upper 89 test
obtained
reported,
site.
the
did
of
containing
103
test
value
intervals
at females
of
dorsal
reported.
rated
Ethylene
score
subjects.
test
were
Glycol
sensitization maximum
of
application,
full
sensitization
14
formulation
that
on
not
The
for
Ethylene
insult
subjects
material
of
3%
irritation 4.O%
arm
of
the
the
of
3%
procedures
half
as
days
or
seven
the
strength
for
0.19
surface
produce
0.5
made
“none
subjects
out
were
of
ethylene
nor
0.58
contained
Stearate: during
hypersensitive
repeated
primary
subjects
on
patch
Glycol
of
On
the
entire
Glycol
1—5%
the
ml
Glycol
after
No
of
would
using
was
score
whom
on
Glycol
three
individuals,
tested
on
assay
before
of
Monday,
of
eight
a
was
ingredient
the
of
contained
under
was
procedures
test.
the
were
any
a
a
maximum
the
there
Stearate:
ethylene
group
a
glycol
the
irritants.” 16 >
the
were
0.25%
were
0.5
for
Distearate: insult
Stearate:
4.0
subject
alternate
In
2—5°I,
28
were
reported.u 6 )
have
on
Distearate:
with
test
subjects,
reported. 16 >
products
reaction the
Over
a
end
upper
COSMETIC
a
examined
ml
an
maximum
any
eight
maximum-effect
21-day
Wednesday,
was
prior
distearate.)
given
single
identical
patch
period.
contained considered
a
liquid
study
eyeliner
of
did
occlusive
the
glycol
2—5%
of
was
cream
A
indication
a
possible
were
0.08.(16)
a
days.
arm
subjects.
The
to
repeated
three-week
the
diluted
not
over challenge
a
tested
0.2%
individual.’ 6
cumulative test
A
solution
challenged
began
the
INGREDIENT
score
A
48
The
of
distearate
to ethylene
containing
group
repeated
formulation
evoke
containing
repeated
stated,
Fourteen
repeated
procedure
the
Fourteen
start
0.004—0.01
and
each
patch.
solution
those
score
and
sensitive.
demonstrated
test
dermatologist
ofsensitiza
The
of
and
insult
entire
of
96
value
patches.
of
any
basis
Friday
47.5
material
period,
subject.
and
the
of
irritancy
average
in
with
glycol
at the
A
hours
insult
were
REVIEW
patch
insult
days
patch
2.5%
days
reac
of
84.0.
3.5%
the
max
one-,
for
was
four-
The
was
was
was
the
was
test.
%
of
a
a
ASSESSMENT:
Table
cases,
tions)
sumer group
dicated
50
averaged period
years.
unscreened
for
very
Glycol been manufacturing
of based
potentially
through viscosity
concentrations cosmetic
primarily
enhances
longed.
Because
the
employees
5%
Consumer
No
Occupational
Glycol
low,
adversely
TABIE
Distearate.a containing
Dishwashing
3
According
there
of
upon:
years
complaints
from
Stearate
of
results
shows
that
liquid
Animal
aData several
subjects.
they
modifier
of
so
1
4
2
3
their
product
percuta
.2
been
3.
GIYCO
Steara
adver
the
the
was
dunn
that
(a)
it
from
corn
whc
are
wer
the
lnf
GI’
Sen
w
for
W(
aft
m
ra
us
3(
rc
e:
si
0
n
t s yen e ntical cream ite: nined r dnesday, )nsidered rs, ontained :he iuid rate: le ‘elmer :ts iod. ETIC cclusive lay idy of A t tearate.)
tch 16) d. ed glycol was id imum-effect r mum 2—5%
possible n indication
a 0.08.
were
subjects.
to
The
a arm
repeated
days. (16)
over
tested .
a
not the
three-week
diluted
cumulative
individuaL(16) (16)
challenge
0.2% test began
the
A INGREDIENT
solution
challenged
score
The
A
48
group
(
formulation
containing containing
of
evoke 16)
ethylene distearate to
repeated
stated,
repeated
the
repeated procedure start
Fourteen
patch.
Fourteen
score
0.004—0.01 and each
sensitive. demonstrated
dermatologist
and
solution
those
test
and The
ofsensitiza of
insult
entire
of
value
of
basis
any
96
47.5
patches. Friday
material
and
subject.
irritancy
of average period, the
at
the
A
REVIEW
with
in glycol
hours
insult patch
patch
insult
were
2.5%
3.5%
days 84.0. reac
one-,
days
max
four
of
was
The
was test.
was was for was
the
the 0/
of
a
a
ASSESSMENT:
Table
group cases, sumer tions) dicated
period years. averaged 50 unscreened
for manufacturing very Glycol been based of potentially
cosmetic through viscosity concentrations primarily
enhances
longed. Because
the
employees
5%
Consumer No
Occupational
Glycol
low,
TABLE
Distearate.a
Dishwashing adversely
containing
3
According there
of
upon:
complaints
years
from
Stearate
results
of
shows
that liquid
aData
subjects.
Animal several
they
modifiers,
1.2 4 2 3 1
so of
their
products.
percutaneous
been
3.
GLYCOL
adverse
the
was Stearate,
the
during that
(a) from it
complaints
were who
are the
Sensitization Information:
Glycol
was
for
work
affected
use
30
mono-
ranging
routes;
exposed
no 0.5—5%
to
studies Ref. some
related
used
range
Exposure:
1 employees
STEARATE,
for
both,
which of
presented
and
reported
%
unaware reaction
14.
They
time.
Glycol
over
Stearates
of
30
individuals
and
on and
from
by
have
of
indicate
Glycol
their per
absorption.
to no
Tests
subjects to years
No.
they
all function
two
One
diesters concentration
exposure
67 87 69 78 Glycol their
employee
their
GLYCOL
rate Two
million.4>
Stearate evidence
of
Two
been of
less
work on body on who
had million
had
Stearate.
and
manufacturer
any
Dishwashing
contact
for
that
irritation
products companies
than
had
SUMMARY
manufacturers
Distearate
for
of used
time;
surfaces,
potentially
been
STEARATE
as shampoos
Glycol
to
complaints
triple-pressed
SE, Glycol
beenexposed
10 reported
of
units
0.1%
emulsifiers,
these
as
with According
(b)
Detergent
years
sensitization
of
produced
and
caused
conc.
wax
containing
Liquids (%)
0.5 1
1 1.5
Distearates
of
ethylene
70
these
to
Stearate for reported
SE,
the
compounds.
noted
Glycol
products
been
containing
had
employees
that
ingredients
bob
AND
20%
having
body
reported Containing
by
ingredients
to
stearic
potentially
dispersants,
his
there.
exposed
to
that
the
GLYCOL
in
glycol
of
the
serves
Distearate
on
after Glycol
may
or
the
for
(various their
numerous
test
arisen
its
the
second
her (4)
4.0%
acid.
who
that This
ingredients
Range
in between Ethylene
challenge.
be
ethylene
distearate
labor
compounds. DISTEARATE
as
0.015—0.075 0.005—0.025
work
to
incidence
health
0.01 stick 0.01—0.05 Stearate. distearate
frequent may
been
for
they
They
a conclusion
of over
Glycol
Glycol (%)
creams
opacifiers,
—0.05
are
company,
conc.
surfactant
turnover
glycol
Glyçol 20 time;
preparations.
categories
be
exposed
might
have
20
are
comprised a
years 4)
of
for for
absorbed
One Stearate
Stearate
and 20-year
of
and and
and
used
many
In each
been
con
have
was
was
had
the
pro
and
and
in
lo all
30
(c)
to
of
at
Washington,
10.
cosmetic
cludes
Glycol
animals.
tion
Glycol 10
sult
posure
period of formulations
with
use,
fects
skin
presented
9.
8.
5.
7. 6. 3.
4.
2.
1.
the
*Available
Wiley
DC.
BALSAM, GLEASON,
FDA. mercial and
ARGUS,
CALDERON, trimethyl
Europ. polysorbate
SUFFIS,
lipids Cosmetic Toiletry
BIRKEL,
COSMETIC,
long-chain
BAUMANN,
ESTRIN,
On
Subchronic
A
The
patch
showed
or
and
a
throughout
ultrastructural
test
that
repeated
(Aug.
on
of
and Distearate Distearate product
sensitization.
consumers
the
Cancer
Products,
T.J., animal
and
R., Human
DC
M.F.,
ingredients
N.E.
a
silyl
time.
MS.
eye
ingredient
compound
upon
Sons.
no
esters
testing
lipophilic
M.N.,
Glycol
31,
60
SULLIVAN,
basis
TOILETRY
20005.
WARNER,
Fragrance
W.j.,
M.
no
ether
(ed.).
containing
SOHAL,
9,
and
evidence
and
1976).
irritation,
request:
and
New
of
237—43.
3rd
formulation
GOSSELIN,
alterations
irritation
data
SEUFERT,
insult
testing
SAGARIN,
the
test
polysorbate
derivatives
diols.
of
(1977).
to
descriptions
should
dextran
BAUMANN,
on
Stearate,
ed.
would
York.
Cosmetic
Association.
CR.,
R.S.,
AND
the
their
Administrator,
T.J.,
Additional
indicate
in
90-day
500
data
Williams
J.
the
patch
CTFA
of
Lipid
the
in
BRYANT, J.
and
available
gel.
Glycol
and
and
FRAGRANCE
has
R.E.,
or
E.
be
HAYES,
times
by
dioxane
scalps,
skin
experience
forearm
80.
for
product
for
(eds.).
FAZIO,
Biochem.
Res. Glycol
sensitization present
Wi.
gas
HENDERSON,
Cosmetic
containing
&
test
considered.
HODGE,
J.
sensitization.
not test
that glycol
formulations
Wilkins.
Assoc.
irritation
chromatography.
G.M., 10(6),
Cosmetic
(1970).
lower
Stearate
H.W.,
carcinogenesis:
(1974).
CONCLUSION
human
REFERENCES
period T.
formulation
under
information
with
these
been
stearate,
ASSOCIATION
(1979). Stearate
was
Biophys.
Ingredient
Offic. practices
H.C.,
703—9.
HOCH-LIGETI,
and
Baltimore.
Naturally
than
Cosmetics:Science
when
Ingredient
W.S.
50%
or
studies 3%
used
HOLMAN,
hot
at
ingredients
and
and
Gas
Anal.
adequately
upon
glycol
Acta.
data.
that
hypersensitivity.
levels
One inference
SE,
Dictionary,
containing
SMITH, (1965).
chromatographic
J.
Glycol
and
they
occurring
after
Chem.
Glycol
Soc.
to
of
stearate
210(1),
challenge. Review,
presented
Food
(CTFA).
which
and
using
C.,
use
wet
R.T.
approximate
subchronic
of
Cosmet.
applied
Identification
R.P.
necropsy.
and
62,
of
and
COSMETIC
Stearate and
2—5%
Glycol
diol
7—14.
have
(1969).
SE,
methylcholanthrene
and
2nd
Suite
(1978)
Distearate
conditions,
investigated
931
Glycol
(1969).
ARCOS,
a
Drug
Technology.
and
lipids.
consumer
>
Chem.
ed.
-36.
810,
determination
concentration.
herein,
low
Prolonged
Mass-spectrometric
4%
a
reported
Submission
glycol
Administration.
Washington,
Clinical
Distearate
shampoo
Human
of
VI.
iC.
showed
1110
Distearate,
skin
INGREDIENT
16(13),
Glycol
acute
surface-active
the
Fractionation
distearate.*
(1973).
on
Vermont 2nd
for
Toxicology
the
would
painting
in high-level
783—94.
of
on
no
of
ed.,
studies
125
oral
a
repeated
no
Dose
data
DC.
Stearate
Panel
1,4-dioxane
containing
acute
are
laboratory
very
Washington,
skin
3
Ave.,
at toxic
analysis
vols.
subjects
toxicity,
Cosmetic,
actually
of
agents
by
REVIEW
response
safe
of
toxicity.
neutral
levels
irrita study
short
using N.W.,
CTFA.
con
Com
John
ex
in
as
ef
or
as
of
in
L
s.
ASSESSMENT:
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
CTEA.
Soap
CTFA. and
absorption FEBVRE, PETKOV,
distearate.* 759—65.
CTFA.
CTFA.
distearate.* glycol
glycol
Perfum.
distearate.*
(Aug.
(1979).
(1979).
(1979).
R.
L.
stearate of
and
(1971). GL.YCOL
12,
potassium
cosmet.
Submissic
Submissk
Submissi
ROBLET
1979).
SE.*
TLC
4
S S :hnology. 310, ion )). OS, determination hem. I Icholanthrene d d. )l concentration. Jitions, g 36. stigated nate arate ite ETIC ids. col y. nic
sy.
herein,
Prolonged low
Mass-spectrometric
4% a
nsumer reported
Submission
glycol
Administration.
Clinical Washington,
Distearate
Human shampoo
of
VI.
J.C.
showed
1110
Distearate,
skin
INGREDIENTREVIEW
16(13),
Glycol acute
surface-active
the
Fractionation
distearate,*
(1973).
on
2nd Vermont
for
Toxicology
the
would
painting
high-level
in
783—94.
of
on no
of
ed., studies
125
oral
a repeated
no
Dose
data DC.
Stearate
Panel
1,4-dioxane
containing
acute are
laboratory
very
Washington, skin
3 Ave.,
at analysis
toxic
vols. subjects
toxicity,
cosmetic, actually
of
agents
by
response
safe
of
toxicity.
neutral levels
irrita short study using
NW,,
CTFA.
con
Com
John
ex
in
or ef as
as
of in
ASSESSMENT:
11. 12.
13. 14.
16. 15.
CTFA. PETKOV, Soap CTFA. and absorption FEBVRE, CTFA. glycol distearate.* distearate. 759—65. CTFA.
glycol
Perfum.
distearate.* (Aug.
(1979).
(1979).
(1979).
R.
L. *
stearate of
and
(1971). GLYCOL
12,
potassium
Cosmet.
Submission
Submission
Submission
ROBLET,
1979).
SE.*
TLC
44, STEARATE,
Submission
iodide,
Identification
M.A.
of
481
of
of
data
daya
—83.
(1963).
data
sodium
by
of
by
GLYCOL
by
CTFA.
data
of
The
CTFA.
salicylate,
CTFA.
the
by
influence
Unpublished
hydrophilic
CTFA.
Unpublished
STEARATE
Unpublished
and
Unpublished
of
ammonium
several
components
safety
SE,
safety
safety
surfactants
AND
data
safety thiocyanate.
data
data
on
GLYCOL
of
on
data
glycol
self-emulsifying
on
in
human
on
ointments
glycol
Ann.
stearate,
glycol
DISTEARATE
sensitization
Pharm.
stearate
stearate
on
glycol
emulsion
the
Franc.
and
cutaneous and distearate,
test
21(11),
bases.
glycol
glycol
with