DOCSLIB.ORG

Five-Year Review Report for Lang Property Superfund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Five-Year Review Report for Lang Property Superfund Five-Year Review Report for Lang Property Superfund Site Pemberton Township Burlington County, New Jei-sey 2005 PREPARED BY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II New York, New York lllllllllllililllllllllllilll 139748 Five-Year Review Report Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Five-Year Review Summary Form . iv I. Introduction ; 1 II. Site Clironology 1 III. Background 1 Physical Characteristics ' 1 Land and Resource Use 2 History of Contamination ., 2 Initial Response ,.;.............. , -2 Basis for Taking Action .^ 2 IV. Remedial Actions 3 Remedy Selection ' 3 Remedy Implementation ./.... .....;..... 3 System Operations/Operation and Maintenance ! . 4 I Institutional Controls ' , 4 V. Progress Since the Last Five-Year Review 5 VI. Five-Year Review Process 5 Administrative Components • .5 Community Involvement . : . 5 Document Review •...:.... ;..... 5 Data Review ..........'./...:.. •. 5 Site Inspection ; 6 V VII. Technical Assessment 6 Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 6 Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action objectives (RAOs) used at the time of the remedy selection still valid? 6 Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness of the remedy? 8 Technical Assessment Summary 8 VIII. Recommendations and Follow-up Actions 9 IX. Protectiveness Statement 9 X. Next Review 9 XI. Bibliography for Lang Property Superfund Site 10 Tables Table 1 - Chronology of Site Events 11 Table 2 - Comparison of maximum groundwater contaminant concentrations to NJ GWQC and MCLs, Federal MCLs, and EPA Region 9 PRGs 12 Figure Figure 1-1 - Site Location Map n EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A five-year review for the Lang Property Superfund site, located in Pemberton Township, Burlington County, New Jersey, was completed in September 2005. The remedy for the site ' included excavation of contaminated shallow soil and waste materials, with disposal at an off- site landfill; restoration of the excavated area by filling and grading, including the removal of surface debris as necessary; extraction and on-site treatment of contaminated ground water, with reinjection of treated water; installation of a security fence to restrict site access; and appropriate environmental monitoring to ensure the effectiveness of the remedial action. The site achieved construction completion status with the signing of the Preliminary Close-Out Report on September 13, 1995. This five-year review was conducted as a matter of EPA policy. The triggering action for this policy review was the first five-year review which EPA completed on September 25, 2000. Based upon a review of the Record of Decision, the Preliminary Close-Out Report, a number of reports prepared by the on-site contractor and inspections of the site, it has been concluded that the remedies at the site function as intended by the Record of Decision and protect human health and the environment. Potential impacts of contaminated shallow soil was addressed through removal of the contaminated soil. The ground water contamination is.being addressed through an on-site pump-and-treat system and through optimizing measures. Long-term response action activities are ongoing. in Five-Year Review Summary Form SITE IDENTIFICATION Site name (from WasteLAN): LANG PROPERTY EPA ID (from WasteLAN): NJD980505382 Region: 2 State: NJ City/County: Pemberton/Burlington County SITE STATUS NPL status: • Final D Deleted n nthpr (gpprify) Remediation status (choose all that apply): • Under Construction • Constructed • Operating IVIultiple OUs?* DYES • NO Construction completion date: 9/13/95 Has site been put into reuse? Q YES • NO D N/A REVIEW STATUS Lead agency: BEPA QState D Tribe D Other Federal Appnry Author name: Lawrence Granite Author title: Remedial Project Manager Author affiliation: EPA Review period:** September 2000 to September 2005 Date(s) of site inspection: 6/17/05 and 7/14/05 Type of review: D Post-SARA D Pre-SARA D N PL-Removal only D Non-NPL Remedial Action Site D NPL State/Tribe-lead • Policy D Regional Discretion Review number: n 1 (first) • 2 (second) n 3 (third) n other (specify) Triggering action: n Actual RA Onsite Construction at OU #1 • Actual RA Start at 0U# 1 Q Construction Completion • Previous Five-Year Review Report • Other (specify) Triggering action date (from WasteLAN): 09/25/00 Does the report include recommendation(s) and follow-up action(s)? Q yes • no Is the remedy protective of the environment? • yes D no D not yet determined * ["OU" refers to operable unit.] ** [Review period should correspond to the actual start and end dates of the Five-Year Review in WasteLAN.] IV Five-Year Review Summary Form (continued) Issues. Recommendations, and Follow-Up Actions This report did not identify any issue or make any recominendation for the protection of public health and/or the environment which was not included or anticipated by the site decision documents. Protectiveness Statement The implemented remedy for the Lang Property Superfund Site protects human health and the environment. There are no current exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks and none are expected. Lang Property Superfund Site Pemberton Township, New Jersey Second Five-Year Review I. Introduction This second five-year review for the Lang Property site, located in Pemberton Township, Burlington County, New Jersey, was conducted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Remedial Project Manager (RPM), Lawrence Granite. The five-year review was conducted pursuant to policy and in accordance with the Comprehensive Five-Year Review Guidance, OSWER Directive 9355.7-03B-P (June 2001). The purpose of five-year reviews is to ensure that implemented remedies are protective of public health and the environment and that they fiinction as designed. This document will become part of the site file. The remedial action for the site was divided into two separate phases. The first phase involved the excavation and removal of contaminated materials from the site. The second phase involves addressing the ground water contamination present at the site. It is the policy of EPA to conduct five-year reviews at sites where the remediation will take longer than five years. Construction of the ground water remediation system began in 1994 and the system continues to operate. The trigger for this second five-year review is the first five-year review which was signed by EPA on September 25, 2000. This five-year review found that the selected remedy remains protective of public health and the environment. II. Site Chronology See Table 1 for site chronology. III. Background Physical Characteristics The Lang Property site is located in Pemberton Township, Burlington County, New Jersey. The site is located on a 40-acre parcel of land in a rural area just south of New Jersey Route 70 off of City ^Line Road (see Figure 1-1). The site is in close proximity to the Brendan T. Byrne State Forest (formerly known as the Lebanon State Forest) and is located within New Jersey's Pinelands National Reserve, which is recognized as one of the nafion's valuable environmental resources. Specifically, the site is located within the Central Pine Barrens Water Quality Critical Area and the Pinelands Preservation Area District. The site is immediately underlain by unconsolidated coastal plain sediments that include thin surficial sands with interbedded silts resting unconformably on the Cohansey Formation. The Cohansey is a major water-bearing unit that, in addition to providing ground water to wells, also functions as a recharge source to other coastal plain aquifers. The Cohansey was identified to a depth of 70 feet at the site and is underlain by the Kirkwood Formation. Ground water generally flows to the northwest. Land and Resource Use The disposal of hazardous wastes occurred over a two-acre area within the 40-acre parcel. There are no residences on the property. Abandoned vehicles, a large number of tires, and other debris were scattered throughout the site prior to remediation. The site is flat and currently contains fields of blueberry plants, most of which are no longer cultivated, and forested areas. Access to the two-acre area is limited by a fence. A ground water treatment facility is present on the site, as well as extraction, injection, and monitoring wells. The site is located within New Jersey's Pinelands National Reserve and is considered ecologically valuable. / History of Contamination In June 1975, between 1,200 and 1,500 drums of unidentified chemical waste were discovered in a clearing at the end of the unpaved road leading to the Lang Property site. Prompted by legal action by the NJDEP in 1976, the site owners hired a contractor to remove the drums and contaminated soils from the site. Before the drums were removed, however, their contents were apparently spilled onto the ground or disposed of in what have been historically described as "on-site lagoons," resulting in the contamination of soil and ground water. Initial Response From 1977 through most of 1979, repeated sampling by the Burlington County Health Department and the NJDEP determined that ground water contaminafion was present. In 1980 and 1981, additional site inspections were conducted by State and local authorities. Basis for Taking Action Following the listing of the site on the NPL in 1982, EPA conducted an RI/FS to better delineate the nature, extent and impact of contamination at the site, and to develop and evaluate remedial alternatives. The RI indicated that surficial soils (0 to 2 feet deep) and subsurface soils in the two- acre area where disposal took place were contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and, to a lesser degree, metals. The most severe contamination was in the surficial soils. Shallow ground water beneath the disposal area was also Contaminated with VOCs and metals. Contaminants had migrated approximately 300 to 500 feet from the disposal area, principally to the northwest, and extended to a depth of 30 feet.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Complete Streets Case Study Cherry Hill, New Jersey
    Complete Streets Case Study Cherry Hill, New Jersey Prepared by: Prepared for: The New Jersey Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Center TheNew JerseyNew Jersey Complete Department Streets Case Studies| 1 at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey of Transportation About This report was written by Charles Brown, MPA, James Sinclair, and Lisa Cintron, of the Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center (VTC) at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. The Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center (VTC) is a national leader in the research and development of innovative trans- portation policy. Located within the Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Rutgers University, VTC has the full array of resources from a major research university on transportation issues of regional and national significance. The New Jersey Bicycle and Pedestrian Resource Center (BPRC) assists public officials, transportation and health professionals, and the public in creating a safer and more accessible walking and bicycling environment through primary research, education and dissemination of information about best practices in policy and design. The Center is supported by the New Jersey Department of Transportation through funds provided by the Federal Highway Administration. Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey 33 Livingston Avenue, Fourth Floor New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901 Acknowledgments The authors would like to extend special thanks to Lorissa Luciani, PP, AICP, Deputy Director of the Department of Commu- nity Development, and Jaclyn Bradley, Cherry Hill Planner, for their invaluable insight into the history and implementation of Complete Streets in Cherry Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • Township of Lakewood in the County of Ocean, New Jersey
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JULY 25, 2012 NEW ISSUE RATING: S & P A+ BOOK-ENTRY ONLY (See “RATING” herein) In the opinion of GluckWalrath LLP, Bond Counsel assuming continuing compliance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), applicable to the Tax-Exempt Bonds and subject to certain provisions of the Code which are described herein, under laws, regulations, rulings and judicial decisions existing on the date of original delivery of the Tax-Exempt Bonds, interest received by holders of the Tax-Exempt Bonds will be excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes and will not be treated as a tax preference item for purposes under Section 57 of the Code for individuals or corporations. Interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds is included in the adjusted current earnings of certain corporations for the purposes of computing the alternative minimum alternative tax on such corporations. However, interest on the Tax-Exempt Bonds may become taxable retroactively if certain requirements under the Code are not complied with. Under the laws of the State of New Jersey, as enacted and construed on the date of original delivery of the Bonds, interest on the Bonds and any gain from the sale thereof is excludable from gross income under the New Jersey Gross Income Tax Act. See “TAX MATTERS” herein for a description of certain other provisions of the Code that may affect the federal tax treatment of interest on the Bonds. TOWNSHIP OF LAKEWOOD IN THE COUNTY OF OCEAN, NEW JERSEY $8,595,000* GENERAL
    [Show full text]
  • DEP Bulletin, 08/18/99 Issue
    You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library TABLE OF CONTENTS August 18, 1999 Volume 23 Issue 16 Application Codes and Permit Descriptions Pg. 2 General Application Milestone Codes Specific Decision Application Codes Permit Descriptions General Information Pg. 3 DEP Public Notices, Hearings and Events of Interest Pg. 4 - 14 Administrative Hearings and Appeals None at this time Environmental Impact Statement and Assessments (EIS and EA) Pg. 15 Permit Applications Filed or Acted Upon Land Use Regulation Program . CAFRA Permit Application Pg. 16 Freshwater Wetlands General Permit Pg. 19 Freshwater Wetlands Individual Permit Pg. 25 Freshwater Wetlands Letter of Interpretation Pg. 26 Freshwater Wetlands Transition Waiver Pg. 33 Stream Encroachment Pg. 36 Waterfront Development Pg. 40 Waterfront Development General Permit Pg. 42 Division of Water Quality Treatment Works Approval (TWA) Pg. 44 DEP Permit Liaisons and Other Governmental Contacts Inside Back Cover Christine Todd Whitman, Governor New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Robert C. Shinn, Jr., Commissioner You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library 2 General Application Milestone Codes Application Approved F = Complete for Filing M = Permit Modification Application Denied H = Public Hearing Date P = Permit Decision Date Application Withdrawal I = Additional Information Requested R = Complete for Review C = Cancelled L = Legal Appeal of Permit Decision T = Additional Information Received Specific Decision Application Codes AVE PLAN = Averaging Plan PA/SOW = Presence/Absence/State Open Waters Only FP/A = Footprint/Absence of Wet., Waters & Transition Area PA/T = Presence/Absence/Transition Area Only F/F = Farming/Forestry/Silviculture Exemption R = Reductions FP/P = Footprint/Wetlands Present REG = HMDC/Pinelands Exemption FP/SOW = Footprint/State Open Waters Present Only SPEC ACTIVITY = Special Activity (Linear Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Magnitude and Frequency of Chandlers Run at Two Sites, at Pennsauken Township, New Jersey
    FLOOD MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY OF CHANDLERS RUN AT TWO SITES, AT PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY ByPaulDunne U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 94-500 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION This report was prepared by the U.S Geological Survey in accordance with New Jersey Department of Transportation contract no. 93PE06 under the direction of Acting State Coordinator Robert J. Cunningham and Project Manager Kal Satija. West Trenton, New Jersey 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center Mountain View Office Park Open-File Reports Section 810 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 206 Box 25286, MS 517 West Trenton, NJ 08628 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract........................................................................................................................................................ ^ Introduction................................^^ Methods used to estimate flood magnitude and frequency................................................................. 3 Rational method.............................................................................................................................3 Special Report 38 method (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection)........... 3 Index-flood method (US. Geological Survey)..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Streetcars Back to Charlotte See Page 22
    Summer 2016 www.ashe.pro Changing Dangerous and Drab to Safe and Fab See page 28 Bringing Streetcars Back to Charlotte See page 22 America’s First Super- highway Turns 75 See page 34 American Society of Highway Engineers 3 DRIVING THE HIGHWAYS OF THE FUTURE WSP | Parsons Brinckerho o ers a full range of planning, design and program/construction management services for highways that connect communities and keep America moving. We’re leaders in developing mobility solutions for how we will travel in the future. Managed lanes Travel demand management ITS Connected/Automated vehicles Driverless vehicles Partner with WSP | Parsons Brinckerho to drive the highways of the future. For the latest news visit: insights.wsp-pb.com For career opportunities visit wsp-pb.com/usa 2 scanner | SUMMER 2016 | ashe.pro Larry Ridlen, PE ASHE National President 2016-2017 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HIGHWAY ENGINEERS hat a distinguished privilege to serve as the National President of a OFFICERS 2016 - 2017 Larry Ridlen, PE, President great organization like ASHE. I am truly honored by the opportunity, Greg Dutton, PE, First Vice President Wand I promise to serve to my upmost capabilities. I could not be your President Richard Cochrane, PE, Second Vice President Robert Hochevar, PE, Past President without the influence of numerous individuals within the ASHE organization for Charles Flowe, PE, Secretary whom I have enormous respect. These individuals include Past Presidents whom I Frank O’Hare, PE/PS, Treasurer have served under, board members both present and past, who have shown me the Three-Year Directors (Region) ropes, and fellow ASHE members at the Section and Region levels who are always Frank Bronzo, PE, Great Lakes Region striving to make ASHE better.
    [Show full text]
  • DEP Bulletin, 02/10/99
    You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library February 10, 1999 Volume 23 Issue 3 Application Codes and Permit Descriptions Pg. 2 General Application Milestone Codes Specific Decision Application Codes Permit Descriptions General Information Pg. 3 DEP Public Notices, Hearings and Events of Interest Pg. 4 - 9 Administrative Hearings and Appeals None at this time Environmental Impact Statement and Assessments (EIS and EA) Pg. 10 Permit Applications Filed or Acted Upon Land Use Regulation Program * Because of a printing error, the 1/27/99 Bulletin repeated the announcements that were published in the previous 1/13/99 Bulletin instead of the correct 1/27/99 announcements. This 2/10/99 issue therefore includes both the correct 1/27/99 announcements and the 2/10/99 announcements. Staff regrets any inconvenience this may have caused our readers. Please be advised that the period for filing an appeal from an action on a permit will run from the actual date of publication. CAFRA Permit Application Pg. 11 Freshwater Wetlands General Permit Pg. 14 Freshwater Wetlands Individual Permit Pg. 25 Freshwater Wetlands Letter of Interpretation 1/27/99 Pg. 25 Freshwater Wetlands Transition Waiver Pg. 37 Stream Encroachment Pg. 42 Waterfront Development Pg. 47 Waterfront Development General Permit Pg. 49 CAFRA Permit Application Pg. 51 Freshwater Wetlands General Permit Pg. 53 Freshwater Wetlands Individual Permit Pg. 58 Freshwater Wetlands Letter of Interpretation 2/10/99 Pg. 59 Freshwater Wetlands Transition Waiver Pg. 66 Stream Encroachment Pg. 69 Waterfront Development Pg. 72 Waterfront Development General Permit Pg. 73 Division of Water Quality Treatment Works Approval (TWA) Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Arrested After Six-Week Narcotics Investigation
    July 15th, 2016 The Ocean County Gazette - www.ocgazette.news 1 The OC Gazette P.O. Box 577 Seaside Heights NJ 08751 On The Web at: www.ocgazette.news JULY 15TH, 2016 VOL. 16 NO. 569 THIS WEEKS ISSUE Three Arrested After Six-Week Audit Finds Pages 10-11 Toms River Ocean County Narcotics Investigation; Featured Events LSD, Marijuana and Weapons Township in Pages 12-18 Around all the Good Financial Ocean County Recovered Towns - News, Shape Information Manchester Township NJ – A six-week investigation by members of the Events Manchester Township Police Department’s Narcotics Enforcement Team (Toms River, NJ) For the fourth year (N.E.T.) culminated in the search of a Summit Park home and the arrests of in a row, an independent audit Pages 22-23 three individuals on drug and weapons charges on Wednesday. shows the town’s finances are in Ocean County During the early morning hours of July 13, 2016, members of the department’s good shape. Library Weekend Narcotics Enforcement Team and Detective Section, along with members of Events and Exhibits the Ocean County Regional SWAT Team, executed a Court authorized search According to a report compiled warrant at a Neal Place residence in the Summit Park section of the Township. by Holman, Frenia & Allison, the Page - 26 The six-week investigation began after the Narcotics Enforcement Team certified public accounting firm Long Beach Island received complaints about possible drug distribution on that block. Police hired to audit the town’s financial Foundation of the Arts & Sciences obtained a search warrant for the residence after a subsequent investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission
    DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION BOARD COMMITTEE Minutes of Meeting of December 3, 2009 Location: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission 190 N. Independence Mall West, 9th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106 Membership Present Representative New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (not represented) New Jersey Department of Transportation David A. Kuhn New Jersey Governor’s Appointee Joseph Neal, Esq. Pennsylvania Governor’s Appointee David Mandelbaum Pennsylvania Governor’s Policy Office Joanne R. Denworth Pennsylvania Department of Transportation James Mosca Bucks County Lynn Bush Chester County Carol Aichele Ronald T. Bailey Delaware County John Pickett Montgomery County Kenneth Hughes Burlington County Leah Arter Carol Ann Thomas Camden County Louis Cappelli, Jr. Esq. Andrew Levecchia Gloucester County Charles Romick Mercer County Donna Lewis City of Chester (not represented) City of Philadelphia Rina Cutler City of Camden Edward Williams City of Trenton Andrew Carten Non-Voting Members Federal Highway Administration New Jersey Division Caroline Trueman Pennsylvania Division (not represented) U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Region III (not represented) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region II (not represented) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III Megan Mackey 1 B-12/03/09 Federal Transit Administration, Region III Keith Lynch Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Byron Comati New Jersey Transit Corporation Pippa Woods New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (not represented) Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Kevin Gallagher Port Authority Transit Corporation Sheryl Spicer Delaware River Port Authority Linda Hayes Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development Toni Crawford-Major Ronald Bednar New Jersey Office of Smart Growth (not represented) Regional Citizens Committee Chair Warren Strumpfer DVRPC Co-Counsel Pennsylvania Co-Counsel Timothy J.
    [Show full text]
  • D:\Elizdvrpc FY 2007 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) For
    Created in 1965, the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) is an interstate, intercounty and intercity agency that provides continuing, comprehensive and coordinated planning to shape a vision for the future growth of the Delaware Valley region. The region includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, as well as the City of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Mercer counties in New Jersey. DVRPC provides technical assistance and services; conducts high priority studies that respond to the requests and demands of member state and local governments; fosters cooperation among various constituents to forge a consensus on diverse regional issues; determines and meets the needs of the private sector; and practices public outreach efforts to promote two-way communication and public awareness of regional issues and the Commission. Our logo is adapted from the official DVRPC seal, and is designed as a stylized image of the Delaware Valley. The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole, while the diagonal bar signifies the Delaware River. The two adjoining crescents represent the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of New Jersey. DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding sources including federal grants from the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey departments of trans- portation, as well as by DVRPC’s state and local member governments. The authors, however, are solely
    [Show full text]
  • DEP Bulletin, 04/28/99
    You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library April 28, 1999 Volume 23 Issue 8 Application Codes and Permit Descriptions Pg. 2 General Application Milestone Codes Specific Decision Application Codes Permit Descriptions General Information Pg. 3 DEP Public Notices, Hearings and Events of Interest Pg. 4 - 11 Administrative Hearings and Appeals None at this time Environmental Impact Statement and Assessments (EIS and EA) Pg. 12 Permit Applications Filed or Acted Upon Land Use Regulation Program . CAFRA Permit Application Pg. 13 Freshwater Wetlands General Permit Pg. 16 Freshwater Wetlands Individual Permit Pg. 22 Freshwater Wetlands Letter of Interpretation Pg. 22 Freshwater Wetlands Transition Waiver Pg. 29 Stream Encroachment Pg. 33 Waterfront Development Pg. 35 Waterfront Development General Permit Pg. 38 Division of Water Quality Treatment Works Approval (TWA) Pg. 39 DEP Permit Liaisons and Other Governmental Contacts Inside Back Cover Christine Todd Whitman, Governor New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Robert C. Shinn, Jr., Commissioner You Are Viewing an Archived Copy from the New Jersey State Library 2 General Application Milestone Codes Application Approved F = Complete for Filing M = Permit Modification Application Denied H = Public Hearing Date P = Permit Decision Date Application Withdrawal I = Additional Information Requested R = Complete for Review C = Cancelled L = Legal Appeal of Permit Decision T = Additional Information Received Specific Decision Application Codes AVE PLAN = Averaging Plan PA/SOW = Presence/Absence/State Open Waters Only FP/A = Footprint/Absence of Wet., Waters & Transition Area PA/T = Presence/Absence/Transition Area Only F/F = Farming/Forestry/Silviculture Exemption R = Reductions FP/P = Footprint/Wetlands Present REG = HMDC/Pinelands Exemption FP/SOW = Footprint/State Open Waters Present Only SPEC ACTIVITY = Special Activity (Linear Dev.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed 2020 Capital Improvement Program New Jersey Turnpike Authority
    PROPOSED 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY March 2020 NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY LEGEND County Boundary PROPOSED 2020 CAPITAL Legislative District Boundary IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projects are listed in approximate chronological order for construction NJTA GSP & TPK Pavement Preservation Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK Hybrid Changeable Message Signs (system-wide) Sussex GSP & TPK Lighting Upgrade Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK Underground Storage Tank Upgrade Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK Median Barrier Improvement Program (system-wide) 24 Passaic GSP & TPK Fiber Optic System Upgrade Program (system-wide) 39 GSP Service Area Ramp Widening Program (system-wide) GSP & TPK ITS Infrastructure and Software Upgrade Program (system-wide) Bergen 13 GSP & TPK Over-Height Vehicle Detection System (system-wide) 26 GSP & TPK Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement Program (system-wide) 40 Morris 38 GSP Corrugated Metal Pipe Replacement and Culvert Rehabilitation (system-wide) Warren 35 1 TPK Interchange 17 Ramp Bridge Replacement 19 37 2 TPK Mainline High-Speed Crossover 3412 GSP & TPK MSE Wall Replacement Program (system-wide) 25 36 29I-3 3 GSP Interchange 6 Completion Essex 11 18 32 4 GSP Interchange 13 Completion 27 5 GSP Interchange 17 Completion 27 133 6 GSP Interchange 20 Completion 28 28 Hudson 29 7 GSP Interchange 29 Completion 31 26 8 GSP Interchange 40 Completion 21 Union 20 25 9 GSP Interchange 80 Completion and Widening between MP 80 - 83 23 14 17 10 22 GSP Interchanges 123 - 124 Completion Somerset 11 GSP Interchange
    [Show full text]
  • BURLINGTON Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code
    HPO Cultural Resource Reports FILTER SETTINGS: (Sorted by: County / Municipality / Shelf Code) County:: BURLINGTON Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code: BURLINGTON BURLINGTON Countywide Countywide BUR B 35 1981 ID3247 MULT F 706a 2005 ID5411 Cultural Resource Survey, Batsto Visitors Center, Wharton State Forest, Delaware River Heritage Trail Cultural Resource Survey Burlington and Burlington County, New Jersey Mercer Counties Budd Wilson RBA Report Type: Archaeology Phase I Report Type: Combined Report Location: STORED (Box P881) Location: SHELVED: CRM BUR GB 40 v1 1977 ID6440 MULT O 1 1980 ID7442 Burlington County Inventory and Survey of Historic, Architectural, and NJ Pinelands Comprehensive Management Plan Cultural Resources: Introduction Report Type: Preservation/Management Plan Burlington County Cultural and Heritage Commission Location: MISSING Report Type: Combined Report Location: SHELVED: GB MULT O 316 1991 ID9064 MULT C 613a 2006 ID8760 Pinelands Cultural Resource Management Plan for Historic Period Sites, Cultural Landscape Report: Bass River State Forest, Burlington and State of New Jersey Pinelands commission Ocean Counties, New Jersey Pinelands Commission CRCG Report Type: Preservation/Management Plan Report Type: Combined Report Location: SHELVED: CRM Location: SHELVED: CRM MULT Z 50e v1 1997 ID8951 ID14328 MULT C 1432 2020 Southern New Jersey Light Rail Transit System: Part 1: Effects Phase I Archaeological Investigation, Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Assessment for Architectural Resources in the Camden Waterfront &
    [Show full text]