The Upper Mississippi Component at the Fort Meigs Site, Northwest Ohio, with Special Emphasis on the Analysis of the Ceramic Assemblage
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1984 The Upper Mississippi Component at The Fort Meigs Site, Northwest Ohio, with Special Emphasis on the Analysis of the Ceramic Assemblage William Evan Rutter Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Rutter, William Evan, "The Upper Mississippi Component at The Fort Meigs Site, Northwest Ohio, with Special Emphasis on the Analysis of the Ceramic Assemblage" (1984). Master's Theses. 1551. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/1551 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE UPPER M I S S I S S I P P I COMPONENT AT THE FORT MEIGS SITE, NORTHWEST OHIO, WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE by Wi11iam Evan Rutter A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfi 1lment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE UPPER MlSSI SSIPPI AN COMPONENT AT THE FORT MEIGS SITE, NORTHWEST OHIO, WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE William Evan Rutter, M.A. Western Michigan University, 198*» An introduction to the late prehistoric Upper Mississippian component of the Ft. Meigs site is presented. Site context and his tory of research are presented, and the non-ceramic artifact assem blage is analyzed and discussed. An in depth analysis of the ceramic assemblage is presented, as well as discussion of the osteological, floral, and faunal remains. Ft. Meigs is then examined from a cul ture ecological perspective, and is discussed in terms of culture historical data and a theoretical schema. The s ite is employed to aid in illumination of the process of cuIture contact in general, and within the western Lake Erie Basin in particular, for the period A.D. 1200 to early historic times. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would 1ike to express my appreciation to the following indivi duals for permitting me to undertake and complete this study. For comments and critical review of the original draft I am grateful to Dr. Wi11 iam Cremin, of Western Michigan University, and Dr. David Stothers, of Toledo University. I also wish to extend my appreciation to Dr. Robert Maher, of Western, for consenting to serve on my thesis committee on rather short notice. I would also like to acknowledge the Toledo Area Aboriginal Research Society, in particular its Presi dent, Mr. Patrick Steiner, for making col lections available for study. Without the excavations completed in cooperation with the Laboratory of Ethnoarchaeology at the University of Toledo, a wealth of data included in this thesis would not have been available for analysis. I would also like to thank my superiors, especially Don Weir, at Gilbert/Commonwealth in Jackson, Michigan, for permitting me to take extended leaves of absence to undertake analysis and write up of this thesis. In addition, the moral support and encouragement provided by Dr. Robert Jack Smith, Chairman of the Department of Anthropology at Western Michigan, is gratefully acknowledged. I also would wish to recognize the financial assistance provided to me by the Department of Anthropology during my years at Western Michigan. Lastly, I would like to thank my parents for the encouragement and aid they provided during the seemingly endless process of completing my degree. I again emphasize my gratitude to the people and institutions mentioned i i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. above, and apologize for any inadvertent omissions. Of course, I, alone am responsible for the contents and conclusions of this thesis William Evan Rutter i i i Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through.an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For illustrations that cannot be satisfactorily reproduced by xerographic means, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and inserted into your xerographic copy. These prints are available upon request from the Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. University Microfilms International 300 N. Z eeb Road Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 1324836 RUTTER, WILLIAM EVAN THE UPPER MISSISSIPPIAN COMPONENT AT THE FORT MEIGS SITE, NORTHWEST OHIO, WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON THE ANALYSIS OF THE CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGE WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY M.A. 1984 University Microfilms International 300 H Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Copyright 1984 by RUTTER, WILLIAM EVAN All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this docum ent have been identified here with a check mark V 1. Glossy photographs or pages. 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print. 3. Photographs with dark background. 4. Illustrations are poor copy 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy. 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page. 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several p ages. 8. Print exceeds margin requirements 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine _ _ 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print. 11. Page(s) __________ lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) ______ __ seem to be missing in numbering only a s text follows. 13 Two pages num bered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled p a g es __ 15. Other________________________________________________________________ _ _________ University Microfilms International Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © Copyright by Wi11iam Evan Rutter 1984 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................... ii LIST OF TABLES . ............................ ............................ vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................... vii LIST OF MAPS ....................... vi ii LIST OF PLATES . .... ix CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .................... ........... .................... 1 Objectives and Research Questions .......... 1 II. SITE CONTEXT AND HISTORY OF RESEARCH AT FT. MEIGS . k Environmental Setting ................... .... k Previous Investigations ........................ 13 III. THE UPPER Ml SSI SSIPPIAN NON-CERAMIC ARTIFACT ASSEMBLAGE ....................... 30 Bone Artifacts .................... 30 Shell A rtifacts ........ ............................ 62 Ft. Meigs Li thics . 71 IV. FT. MEIGS CERAMICS ASSEMBLAGE . ....................... 103 Analytic Approach . 103 Inventory of Ceramic Types and Varieties .......................... 111 Miscellaneous Ceramic Artifacts 17** V. STRUCTURAL EVIDENCE ....................... 179 VI. HUMAN OSTEOLOGY .... ............. 184 VII. FLORAL AND FAUNAL