DOCSLIB.ORG

The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 Stoke-On-Trent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 Stoke-On-Trent Indices of Deprivation 2010 - Stoke-on-Trent The English Indices of Deprivation 2010 Stoke-on-Trent - Summary Table of Contents Introduction – What is multiple deprivation?................................................................................ 2 Multiple Deprivation - The Regional Picture ................................................................................ 3 Multiple Deprivation - Unitary and Metropolitan Authorities ........................................................ 3 Multiple Deprivation - Local Authority Comparison ..................................................................... 4 Comparing IMD2000, ID2004, ID2007 and ID2010 - Persistent Deprivation.............................. 5 Multiple Deprivation - The Local Picture...................................................................................... 7 Map: Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Stoke-on-Trent (ID 2007 inset) ............................ 8 Differing Domains / Dimensions of Deprivation........................................................................... 9 Figure 1 – Deprivation Domains : Comparing Different Aspects of Deprivation ................... 10 Ward Level Deprivation ............................................................................................................. 11 Pre-2011 Boundaries............................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2 – Deprivation Deciles : Pre-2011 Ward Boundaries ............................................... 13 Map: 2011 Ward Boundaries and Indices and Deprivation 2010.......................................... 14 2011 Wards – Relative deprivation levels and ranks 2010 ................................................... 15 2011 Wards – Relative deprivation levels and ranks – by deprivation domain (1) ............... 16 2011 Wards – Relative deprivation levels and ranks – by deprivation domain (2) ............... 17 2011 Wards – Relative deprivation levels and ranks – by deprivation domain (3) ............... 18 1 Performance & Improvement Team – March 2011 Indices of Deprivation 2010 - Stoke-on-Trent Introduction – What is multiple deprivation? The 2010 edition of the English Indices of Deprivation were released by the Communities and Local Government agency on Thursday 24 th March 2011. Full details of the release can be found at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/communities/research/indicesdeprivation/deprivation10/ The Indices of Deprivation 2010 (ID2010) are measures of deprivation for every Super Output Area 1 and local authority area in England. The indices combine a total of 38 indicators across seven domains (Income, Employment, Health and Disability, Education, Skills and Training, Barriers to Housing and Services, Living Environment, and Crime) into a single deprivation score and rank for each area. ID2010 is based on the same approach, structure and methodology used in 2007 and 2004. These differ from the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 (IMD2000) in two key ways: first, more up-to-date data has been used; and second, new measures have been incorporated as new and improved sources have become available. The model that underpins ID2010 is based on the idea of distinct domains; or dimensions; of deprivation, that can be recognised and measured separately; these dimensions are experienced by individuals living in an area. People may be counted in one or more of the domains, depending on the number of types of deprivation that they experience. The overall ID is conceptualised as a weighted aggregation of these specific dimensions of deprivation. Each Domain contains a number of indicators. Each indicator is subject to a number of criteria: • It should be ‘domain specific’; • Appropriate for the purpose (as direct as possible measures of that form of deprivation); Measure major features of that deprivation (not conditions just experienced by a very small number of people or areas); • Up-to-date and capable of being updated on a regular basis; • Statistically robust; and • Available for the whole of England at a small area level in a consistent form. The following sets out the weightings that were used to combine the Domains into an Index of Multiple Deprivation. Income deprivation 22.5% Employment deprivation 22.5% Health deprivation and disability 13.5% Education, skills and training deprivation 13.5% Barriers to housing and services 9.3% Crime 9.3% Living Environment deprivation 9.3% 1 Super Output Areas are an aggregation of Census Output Areas, which are modelled upon postcodes. While Census Output Areas equate to approximately 125 households, or 275 persons, Super Output Areas contain c.1,500 persons. There are 825 Census Output Areas for the City of Stoke-on-Trent dating from the 2001 Census, these have subsequently been aggregated into 160 level 1 SOAs. 2 Performance & Improvement Team – March 2011 Indices of Deprivation 2010 - Stoke-on-Trent Multiple Deprivation - The Regional Picture The following table shows a distinct regional pattern in terms of multiple deprivation: There is a pronounced North-South divide, with a concentration of ‘most deprived’ districts in London, with a transitional Midlands region containing an element of both ‘most’ and ‘least’ deprived districts. Number of Districts in the 50 Districts in the 50 Region Districts in Most Deprived in Least Deprived in Region England England Least London 33 12 1 East of England 47 0 10 South East 67 1 29 South West 37 0 1 West Midlands 30 5 2 East Midlands 40 4 5 North West 39 17 1 North East 12 6 0 Yorkshire & Humberside 21 5 1 The following table demonstrates this regional variation in terms of population percentages. % of the Population living in areas classified in the:- 10% most 20% most 50% least Region deprived deprived deprived London 8.3% 26.0% 33.1% East of England 2.8% 7.5% 65.7% South East 2.3% 7.0% 68.7% South West 3.8% 9.0% 58.6% West Midlands 16.1% 28.1% 42.5% East Midlands 7.2% 16.6% 54.3% North West 20.0% 31.9% 41.1% North East 16.5% 31.9% 35.9% Yorkshire & Humberside 16.9% 27.5% 44.6% Multiple Deprivation - Unitary and Metropolitan Authorities Further analysis shows that 30 of the 92 Unitary and Metropolitan districts in England are placed in the 50 most deprived areas on this measure – 17 in the North West region, 6 in the North East, and 5 each in the West Midlands and Yorkshire & Humberside. A total of 5 of the 92 are ranked in the 50 least deprived areas (Including 4 in the South East region – Wokingham, Windsor & Maidenhead, West Berkshire and Bracknell). 3 Performance & Improvement Team – March 2011 Indices of Deprivation 2010 - Stoke-on-Trent Multiple Deprivation - Local Authority Comparison The following table shows the relative position of the city against local, regional and national comparators. Rank ID 2010 % of the Population living in areas classified in the:- ID 2010 ID2007 10% most 20% most 50% least / 326 / 354 deprived deprived deprived Stoke-on-Trent 16 th 16 th 31.2% 51.0% 16.7% Local Comparators Newcastle-under-Lyme 150 th 152nd 3.1% 14.1% 54.2% Staffordshire Moorlands 190 th 192nd 0% 4.6% 66.8% Stafford Borough 232 nd 253 rd 0% 5.5% 79.5% Regional Comparators Birmingham 9th 11 th 39.7% 55.6% 14.5% Sandwell 12 th 14 th 29.6% 58.5% 11.0% Wolverhampton 21 st 28 th 26.8% 52.3% 17.8% Walsall 30 th 45 th 24.1% 44.5% 26.5% Unitary & Metropolitan Comparators Kingston-upon-Hull 10 th 11 th 42.1% 51.5% 17.2% Nottingham 20 th 13 th 24.6% 51.4% 16.1% Salford 18 th 15 th 32.2% 46.2% 20.5% Leicester 25 th 20 th 24.9% 40.8% 13.8% Further analysis on this measure shows that of the 326 (*) English Local Authority Districts:- • 142 have no part of their population classified in the 10% most deprived in England, • 78 have no part of their population classified in the 20% most deprived in England, • Only one authority has no part of its population classified in the 50% most deprived in England (Hart – South East region), • Only two authorities have no part of their population classified in the 50% least deprived in England (London Boroughs of Hackney and Newham). Stoke-on-Trent is the 3rd most deprived local authority in the West Midlands (out of 30) and the 9th most deprived Unitary / Metropolitan authority area in England (out of 92). (*) - Following Local Government reorganisation in 2008 and 2009 - Previously 354. 4 Performance & Improvement Team – March 2011 Indices of Deprivation 2010 - Stoke-on-Trent Comparing IMD2000, ID2004, ID2007 and ID2010 - Persistent Deprivation From the table below it can be seen that despite changes in the construction of the indices – especially between 2000 and 2004 - in terms of both weightings and indicators used and the change in geographical level adopted - that similar areas have emerged as the most deprived. Given that the domains and methodology used in ID2010 is the same as in 2004 & 2007, and as far as possible the indicators are equivalent to their ID2007 counterparts – most change between the indices is likely to reflect real relative change between the two time periods. 17 of the 20 most deprived areas identified in ID2010 were in the top 20 on ID2007, and 13 in the top 20 on IMD2000 as shown in below. Rank IMD Rank ID2010 Rank ID2007 Rank ID2004 Local Authority Area 2000 Liverpool 1 1 1 3 Hackney 2 2 5 4 Newham 3 6 11 5 Manchester 4 4 2 6 Knowsley 5 5 3 2 Blackpool 6 12 24 31 Tower Hamlets 7 3 4 1 Middlesbrough 8 9 10 9 Birmingham 9 10 15 23 Kingston upon Hull, City of 10 11 9 13 Burnley 11 46 37 21 Sandwell 12 14 16 17 Haringey 13 20 13 18 Islington 14 8 6 11 Waltham Forest 15 62 47 27 City of Stoke-on-Trent 16 16 18 34 Blackburn with Darwen 17 17 34 10 Salford 18 15 12 21 Hastings 19 35 38 31 City of Nottingham 20 13 7 12 Further investigation has shown: 40 of the 50 most deprived areas identified in ID2000 are still in the top 50 in ID2010. 85 of the 100 most deprived areas identified in ID2000 are still in the top 100 in ID2010. 22 of the 50 least deprived areas identified in ID2000 are still in the least deprived 50 in ID2010. 67 of the 100 least deprived areas identified in ID2000 are still in the least deprived 100 in ID2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Transforming North Staffordshire Overview
    Transforming North Staffordshire Overview Prepared for the North Staffordshire Regeneration Partnership March 2008 Contents Foreword by Will Hutton, Chief Executive, The Work Foundation 3 Executive summary 4 1. Introduction 10 1.1 This report 10 1.2 Overview of North Staffordshire – diverse but inter-linked 12 1.3 Why is change so urgent? 17 1.4 Leading change 21 2. Where is North Staffordshire now? 24 2.1 The Ideopolis framework 24 2.2 North Staffordshire’s economy 25 2.3 North Staffordshire’s place and infrastructure 29 2.4 North Staffordshire’s people 35 2.5 North Staffordshire’s leadership 40 2.6 North Staffordshire’s image 45 2.7 Conclusions 48 3. Vision for the future of North Staffordshire and priorities for action 50 3.1 Creating a shared vision 50 3.2 Vision for the future of North Staffordshire 53 3.3 Translating the vision into practice 55 3.4 Ten key priorities in the short and medium term 57 A. Short-term priorities: deliver in next 12 months 59 B. Short and medium-term priorities: some tangible progress in next 12 months 67 C. Medium-term priorities 90 4. Potential scenarios for the future of North Staffordshire 101 4.1 Scenario 1: ‘Policy Off’ 101 4.2 Scenario 2: ‘All Policy’ 102 4.3 Scenario 3: ‘Priority Policy’ 104 4.4 Summary 105 5. Conclusions 106 2 Transforming North Staffordshire – Overview Foreword by Will Hutton, Chief Executive, The Work Foundation North Staffordshire is at a crossroads. Despite the significant economic, social and environmental challenges it faces, it has an opportunity in 2008 to start building on its assets and turning its economy around to become a prosperous, creative and enterprising place to live, work and study.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Rise of the Far Right: Survey Results
    Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 57 Understanding the rise of the far right: Survey results Martin Boon ICM Research Understanding the rise of the far right: Survey results Martin Boon ICM Research © Equality and Human Rights Commission 2010 First published Spring 2010 ISBN 978 1 84206 276 0 EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION RESEARCH REPORT SERIES The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Commission by commissioned researchers The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other Commission research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com If you require this publication in an alternative format, please contact the Communications Team to discuss your needs at: [email protected] Contents Tables...................................................................................................................... i Figures.................................................................................................................... ii Abbreviations........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stoking Employment
    Stoking Employment Local Sustainable Transport Fund Tranche 2 Application Form Local Sustainable Transport Fund - Application Form Applicant Information Local transport authority name(s)*: Stoke-on-Trent City Council Senior Responsible Owner name and position: Pete Price: Assistant Director – Technical Services, City Renewal Directorate Bid Manager name and position: John Nichol: Strategic Manager Transportation and Engineering Contact telephone number: 01782 236178 Email address: [email protected] [email protected] Postal address: Civic Centre, Glebe Street, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 1HH Website address for published bid: www.stoke.gov.uk/ltp Section A – Project description and funding profile A1. Project Name. Stoking Employment A2. Headline description: This package of sustainable transport interventions will improve access to three major employment sites and will significantly enhance the local economy through: • improved connectivity to jobs from areas of deprivation, resulting in better opportunities for employment of local residents; • helping to unlock 10,000 jobs; • an increased pool of labour available to businesses on the key employment sites. The package also includes measures specifically aimed at reducing levels of CO2 by: • increasing the number of employees travelling to the sites by sustainable modes; • providing better bus measures; increased travel planning, marketing and availability of information and implementation of walking / cycling initiatives. A3. Geographical area: Figure 1: Location plan Figure 1 shows the spatial area covered by this application. Stoke-on- Trent is a large city, with a population of approximately 239,000 people. It lies in an enviable strategic location, at the heart of the country, between the West Midlands and North West conurbations.
    [Show full text]
  • New Campaign Drives Home Recycling Message See Centre Pages Our City P2 11/2/15 09:53 Page 1
    Our City p1 11/2/15 09:50 Page 1 ISSUE 39: SPRING 2015 Stoke-on-Trent Free cycling map with this Our Citymagazine New campaign drives home recycling message See centre pages Our City p2 11/2/15 09:53 Page 1 2 Our City SPRING 2015 Successful city Jobs and growth The view from the Wolstanton retail park junction on the A500 looking pushes ahead towards the Etruria Valley site. fast on future quality of life By City Council Leader Councillor MOHAMMED PERVEZ STOKE-on-Trent is growing fast, and that’s official.The city has been identified by Government as being in the UK’s top five places for economic growth. I know many people are still struggling to improve their lives, but we are out of the dark days of economic gloom and pushing ahead fast. There’s a long way to go, but this city is alive with enthusiasm and energy once again. The number of jobs being created is increasing faster than many other cities – over 3,000 new jobs over the last two years.That’s two and a half times faster than the national average. Portmeirion has reported growing profits and is investing to increase production by 50 per cent. Steelite made a similar investment last year. New companies are setting up.The industrial roots of this city are growing again. Green light for road to Businesses are clear that this city needs a strong city centre where international investors feel at home.That’s why we are building Smithfield, the city’s new central business district.That’s why we signed the City Deal boost jobs and growth with Government to develop the UK’s largest deep geothermal district heating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 Final Report
    West Midlands North Housing Market Area Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2007 Final Report April 2008 WEST MIDLANDS NORTH HOUSING MARKET AREA STRATEGIC HOUSING MARKET ASSESSMENT CONTENTS FOREWORD 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 1 APPROACH 33 1.1 Purpose and objectives of the study 33 1.2 Methodology 34 1.3 Report structure 36 2 POLICY CONTEXT 38 2.1 Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3): Housing 38 2.2 Strategic Housing Market Assessments 40 2.3 Housing Green Paper 42 2.4 Regional Housing Strategy 44 2.5 Regional Spatial Strategy 46 2.6 West Midlands Economic Strategy 47 2.7 New Growth Points 48 2.8 Housing market renewal 50 3 THE DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC CONTEXT 53 3.1 Introduction 53 3.2 Population change 54 3.3 Migration 56 3.4 Household types and tenure 62 3.5 Black and minority ethnic communities 66 3.6 International migration 68 3.7 Economic performance 72 3.8 Employment 75 3.9 Income and earnings 79 print: 18-Apr-08 1 ref: z:\projects\north shma\reports\final report v5.0.doc 4 THE HOUSING STOCK 84 4.1 Introduction 84 4.2 Tenure 85 4.3 Dwelling type 88 4.4 Stock condition 95 4.5 Over-crowding and under occupation 100 4.6 Shared housing and communal establishments 101 5 THE ACTIVE MARKET 103 5.1 Introduction 103 5.2 The cost of housing for sale 104 5.3 House price change 108 5.4 Sales and turnover 117 5.5 Local incomes and local house prices 121 5.6 The cost of private rented housing 125 5.7 The cost of social housing 127 5.8 Entry-level housing 129 5.9 Affordability of housing for sale 131 5.10 Affordability of private rented housing 135
    [Show full text]
  • Limited and Guild Realisations Limited (Formerly Republic (Retail) Limited) - Both in Administration (Together ‘The Companies’)
    Ernst & Young LLP 1 Bridgewater Place, Water Lane Leeds LS11 5QR T el: 0113 298 2200 Fax: 0113 298 2201 www.ey.com/uk TO ALL KNOWN CREDITORS 8 April 2013 Ref: RHK/JPS/TRJ/AE/PCF11.1 Direct line: 0113 298 2496 Direct fax: 0113 298 2206 Email: [email protected] Dear Sirs Republic (UK) Limited and Guild Realisations Limited (formerly Republic (Retail) Limited) - both in Administration (together ‘the Companies’) Further to my appointment as Joint Administrator of the Companies, I attach a copy of my statement of proposals in accordance with paragraph 49 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. As you will note from the proposals, there is no prospect of any funds becoming available to unsecured creditors of either of the Companies other than by virtue of the prescribed part. As a consequence, I do not propose to summon meetings of creditors. If, however, creditors whose debts amount to at least 10% of total debts of either of the Companies make a request in the prescribed form within 8 business days of these proposals being sent out, a meeting will be held in that company. Copies of the prescribed form (Form 2.21B) are enclosed in case you wish to request a meeting. I would draw your attention to the provisions of Rule 2.37 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 which provide that if a meeting is requested, it will only be held if the expenses of summoning and holding such a meeting are paid by the creditor or creditors making the request and if security is first deposited with me for payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire & City of Stoke-On-Trent
    Staffordshire & City of Stoke-on-Trent Care Services Directory 2018 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS STOKEONTRENT NEWCASTLEUNDERLYME EAST STAFFORDSHIRE STAFFORD SOUTH EAST STAFFORDSHIRE CANNOCK CHASE SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRE LICHFIELD TAMWORTH The comprehensive guide to choosing and paying for care • Home support • Specialist care • Useful contacts • Care homes in association with www.carechoices.co.uk Trentside Manor Care Home Our Commitment to Care Everyone at Trentside Manor Care Home has a personal and professional commitment to providing excellent care. We know that the thought of moving into a care home can often be very traumatic for both residents and relatives but that it is sometimes the only option available in order to maintain personal safety, security and provide appropriate levels of care. Prior to admission, each new resident is encouraged to visit the home to satisfy themselves that the ambience is to their liking. We provide a unique care and support plan that works for each individual. We encourage and support people to continue doing as many daily tasks as possible, pursue their interests and hobbies, stay active and spend quality time with family and friends. We will ensure that we work with you and your family, friends, advocates and other professionals involved in your life in gathering all the information we need to make sure we can meet your needs. Endon Road, Norton Green, Stoke-on-Trent ST6 8PA T: 01782 535402 E: [email protected] Our mission is to provide an excellent standard of care provision to all individuals in our care which embraces our values and principles of a person centered care framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying the Oversubscription Criteria
    2021/22 Applying for School Places 1 Apply online at www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/schooladmissions Apply online for a school place It’s quick and easy You can apply from 1st September 2020 at www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/ schooladmissions Applications should be submitted by 31st October 2020 for secondary 15th January 2021 for primary If you are a parent resident in Cheshire East, with a child born between 1 September 2016 and 31 August 2017, your child will be due to start primary school in September 2021. If you do not have web access call 0300 123 5012 Late applications may be disadvantaged 2 Apply online at www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/schooladmissions Councillor Kathryn Flavell Jacky Forster Children and Families Portfolio Director of Education Holder and 14-19 Skills Dear Parents to optimise the chance of you being successful in Your child will soon be approaching the important being offered one of your preferences. We work milestone where you need to consider and apply for closely with housing developers to create additional a school place to either start in Reception at primary school places where these are needed and obtain school or start at secondary school in September financial contributions from them to support school 2021. We appreciate this is a really important decision expansions. for you and your child. We would urge you to read the information in this This booklet aims to provide you with information booklet and submit your application by the deadline. about schools and/or signpost you to information to Parents are asked to think about how their child support you in identifying your preferred schools and will travel to school when making their preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Boundary Commission for England
    BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND PROCEEDINGS AT THE 2018 REVIEW OF PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCIES IN ENGLAND HELD AT COUNTY BUILDINGS, MARTIN STREET, STAFFORD, ST16 2LH ON MONDAY 14 NOVEMBER 2016 DAY ONE Before: Ms Margaret Gilmore, The Lead Assistant Commissioner ____________________________________________________________ Transcribed from audio by W B Gurney & Sons LLP 83 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0HW Telephone Number: 020 3585 4721/22 ____________________________________________________________ Time noted: 10.00 am THE LEAD ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER: Good morning ladies and gentlemen. It is great to be here in Stafford and welcome to this public hearing on the Boundary Commission for England’s initial proposals for new parliamentary constituency boundaries in the West Midlands. My name is Margaret Gilmore, I am an Assistant Commissioner of the Boundary Commission for England and I was appointed by the Commission to assist them in their task of making recommendations for new constituencies in the West Midlands. I am responsible for chairing the hearing today and tomorrow and I am also responsible, with my fellow Assistant Commissioner David Latham, who is here, for analysing all of the representations received about the initial proposals and then presenting recommendations to the Commission as to whether or not those initial proposals should be revised. I am assisted here today by members of the Commission staff led by Glenn Reed, who is sitting beside me and Glenn will shortly provide an explanation of the Commission’s initial proposals for new constituencies in this region and he will tell you how you can make written representations and will deal with one or two administrative matters. The hearing today is scheduled to run from 10.00 am until 8.00 pm and tomorrow it is scheduled to run from 9.00 am until 5.00 pm and I can vary that timetable and I will take into account the attendance and the demand for opportunities to speak.
    [Show full text]
  • 10700887.Pdf
    Business structure, busines culture, and the industrial district : The Potteries, c. 1850- 1900. POPP, Andrew Derek Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3099/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/3099/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. agfBCSMSS lX 585 586 5 Return to Learning Centre of issue Fines are charged at 50p per hour REFERENCE ProQuest Number: 10700887 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10700887 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 BUSINESS STRUCTURE, BUSINESS CULTURE. AND THE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT: THE POTTERIES, c.1850-1900.
    [Show full text]
  • Signposting Directory
    Signposting Directory • Self-help and support groups • Education and Learning • Faith Communities • Health Care • Housing • Relationships • Family and Friends • Leisure and Recreation • Work and Money Promoting well-being through primary and community services Contents Section 1 Signposting Directory Information on a wide range of local non-medical services that support well-being Section 2 Health Services Directory Information on local healthcare services and national self-help organisations, covering a wide range of health issues and medical conditions Section 3 Self-help for common Mental Health Problems Sources of self-help material for people with mild to moderate mental health problems Signposting Directory Section 1 Signposting Directory About this Directory This directory is for use by primary care and community staff, in signposting patients to groups and services that may help them to improve their health and well-being. It has been designed to be used in conjunction with the patient ‘prompt’, copies of which for pharmacies and general practice can be found over the page. In general practice, the ‘prompt’ information should be given to the patient in advance of their consultation if possible, to allow them time to consider if they have any well-being related issues they wish to raise. In pharmacies, the ‘prompt’ poster should be displayed where it can easily be seen. You can order copies of the ‘prompt’ materials from Health Improvement (01782) 298055. Contact details slips are provided at the front of the directory. Two versions are available. The second has been designed with people with learning disabilities in mind. Please use these to provide patients with details of relevant organisations/services to take away.
    [Show full text]
  • NS SOT Ccgs Extraordinary GB in Common
    Cannock Chase Clinical Commissioning Group East Staffordshire Clinical Commissioning Group North Staffordshire Clinical Commissioning Group South East Staffordshire and Seisdon Peninsula Clinical Commissioning Group Stafford and Surrounds Clinical Commissioning Group Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Group Meeting in Common of the North Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Clinical Commissioning Groups’ Governing Bodies held in Public Tuesday 25 June 2019, 9.30 am to 12 noon Stoke on Trent Moat House, Etruria Hall, Festival Way, ST1 5BQ Agenda A=Approval R=Ratification S=Assurance D=Discussion I=Information Enc. Lead A/R/S/D/I Time 1. Welcome Verbal AB I 9.30 2. Apologies Verbal AB I Declaration of Interest and actions taken to 3. Enc. 01 AB I manage conflicts 4. Quoracy Verbal SY I Items for Discussion Conscientious consideration of the feedback on the consultation regarding – The Future of Local Health Services in Northern Staffordshire Gemma Smith, GS Associate Director of Strategic Commissioning A/S/D/I 5. Anna Collins, Enc. 02 AC 9.45 Associate Director of Communications & Engagement SW Stephen Williams, Head of Engagement, Involvement and Insight, Communications and Engagement, Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit Items for Information Any Other Business 6. Verbal AB 11.15 • Questions from the Public Meeting effectiveness Did we achieve what we set out to do; linking back to the Agenda? 7. AB S 12.15 Was the information presented appropriate / easy to understand? Cannock Chase Clinical Commissioning Group East Staffordshire
    [Show full text]