DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Kirklees

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Kirklees Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Kirklees Report to The Electoral Commission July 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 340 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 15 3 Draft recommendations 19 4 Responses to consultation 21 5 Analysis and final recommendations 25 6 What happens next? 47 Appendices A Final recommendations for Kirklees: Detailed mapping 49 B Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral change Order 51 C First draft of the electoral change Order for Kirklees 53 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Robin Gray Joan Jones CBE Ann M. Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England. Our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. This report sets out our final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the borough of Kirklees in West Yorkshire. 5 6 Summary We began a review of Kirklees' electoral arrangements on 8 May 2002. We published our draft recommendations for electoral arrangements on 11 February 2003, after which we undertook an eight-week period of consultation. We now submit final recommendations to The Electoral Commission. • This report summarises the representations that we received during consultation on our draft recommendations, and contains our final recommendations to The Electoral Commission. We found that the existing arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in Kirklees: • In nine of the 24 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10% from the average for the borough, and one ward varies by more than 20%. • By 2006 this situation is expected to worsen, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10% from the average in 11 wards and by more than 20% in two wards. Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (see Tables 1 and 2 and paragraphs 119 -120) are that: • Kirklees Metropolitan Council should have 69 councillors, three fewer than at present; • there should be 23 wards, instead of 24 as at present; • the boundaries of 23 of the existing wards should be modified, resulting in a net reduction of one, and one ward should retain its existing boundaries. The purpose of these proposals is to ensure that, in future, each borough councillor represents approximately the same number of electors, bearing in mind local circumstances. • In 22 of the proposed 23 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10% from the borough average. • An improved level of electoral equality is forecast to continue, with the number of electors per councillor in only two wards, Holme Valley South and Mirfield, expected to vary by more than 10% from the average for the borough in 2006. Recommendations are also made for changes to parish council electoral arrangements which provide for: • new warding arrangements for Holme Valley and Kirkburton parishes; • a decrease in the number of councillors for Holme Valley Parish Council. 7 All further correspondence on these final recommendations and the matters discussed in this report should be addressed to The Electoral Commission, which will not make an Order implementing them before 9 September 2003. The information in the representations will be available for public access once the Order has been made. The Secretary The Electoral Commission Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW Fax: 020 7271 0667 Email: [email protected] 8 Table 1: Final recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Large map councillors reference 1 Almondbury 3 Part of Almondbury ward; the proposed Lepton parish ward of 5 Kirkburton parish; part of Newsome ward. 2 Ashbrow 3 Part of Birkby ward; part of Deighton ward. 1, 4 and 5 3 Batley East 3 Part of Batley East ward; part of Batley West ward; part of 2 Birstall & Birkenshaw ward; part of Dewsbury East ward. 4 Batley West 3 Part of Batley West ward; part of Birstall & Birkenshaw ward. 2 5 Birstall & 3 Part of Batley West ward; part of Birstall & Birkenshaw ward; part 1 and 2 Birkenshaw of Cleckheaton ward; part of Spen ward. 6 Cleckheaton 3 Part of Birstall & Birkenshaw ward; part of Cleckheaton ward; 1 part of Spen ward. 7 Colne Valley 3 Part of Colne Valley West ward; part of Golcar ward; part of 3, 4, 7 and Lindley ward. 8 8 Crosland Moor & 3 Part of Crosland Moor ward; part of Newsome ward; part of 4 Netherton Paddock ward. 9 Dalton 3 Part of Almondbury ward; part of Dalton ward; part of Deighton 5 ward; the proposed Kirkheaton parish ward of Kirkburton parish. 10 Denby Dale 3 The parish of Denby Dale. 6, 9 and 10 11 Dewsbury East 3 Part of Batley East ward; part of Dewsbury East ward. 2 and 6 12 Dewsbury South 3 Unchanged – the existing Thornhill ward. 2 and 6 13 Dewsbury West 3 Part of Batley West ward; part of Dewsbury East ward; part of 2 and 6 Dewsbury West ward. 14 Golcar 3 Part of Colne Valley West ward; part of Crosland Moor ward; part 4 of Golcar ward; part of Lindley ward; part of Paddock ward. 15 Greenhead 3 Part of Birkby ward; part of Deighton ward; part of Paddock 4 and 5 ward. 16 Heckmondwike 3 Part of Batley West ward; part of Birstall & Birkenshaw ward; part 1 and 2 of Heckmondwike ward; part of Spen ward. 17 Holme Valley North 3 The existing Honley West parish ward and the proposed 3, 4, 5, 8 Brockholes, Honley Central & East and Honley South parish and 9 wards of Holme Valley parish; the parish of Meltham. 18 Holme Valley South 3 The existing Wooldale parish ward and the proposed Fulstone, 7, 8, 9 and Hepworth, Holmfirth Central, Netherthong, Scholes, Upper 11 Holme Valley and Upperthong parish wards of Holme Valley parish. 19 Kirkburton 3 The existing Flockton, Kirkburton, Shelley, Shepley and 5, 6, 9 and Thurstonland & Farnley Tyas parish wards and the proposed 10 Lepton & Whitley Upper parish ward of Kirkburton parish. 20 Lindley 3 Part of Birkby ward; part of Golcar ward; part of Lindley ward; 4 part of Paddock ward. 21 Liversedge & 3 Part of Cleckheaton ward; part of Heckmondwike ward; part of 1, 2 and 5 Gomersal Spen ward. 9 Ward name Number of Constituent areas Large map councillors reference 22 Mirfield 3 The parish of Mirfield. 1, 2, 5 and 6 23 Newsome 3 Part of Almondbury ward; part of Deighton ward; part of 4 Newsome ward; part of Paddock ward. Notes: 1) The south of the borough and Mirfield are the only parished parts of the borough and comprise the seven wards indicated above in the relevant constituent areas. 2) The wards in the above table are illustrated on Map 2 and the large maps. 10 Table 2: Final recommendations for Kirklees Ward name Number Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance of councillors (2001) electors from (2006) electors from per average per average councillor % councillor % 1 Almondbury 3 12,892 4,297 2 12,995 4332 -2 2 Ashbrow 3 12,802 4,267 1 13,595 4,532 3 3 Batley East 3 12,162 4,054 -4 12,810 4,270 -3 4 Batley West 3 12,688 4,229 0 13,515 4,505 2 5 Birstall & Birkenshaw 3 12,178 4,059 -4 12,755 4,252 -4 6 Cleckheaton 3 12,087 4,029 -5 12,924 4,308 -2 7 Colne Valley 3 12,555 4,185 -1 13,080 4,360 -1 8 Crosland Moor & 3 12,701 4,234 0 13,233 4,411 0 Netherton 9 Dalton 3 12,548 4,183 -1 12,896 4,299 -3 10 Denby Dale 3 12,082 4,027 -5 12,396 4,132 -6 11 Dewsbury East 3 12,605 4,202 -1 13,023 4,341 -2 12 Dewsbury South 3 12,221 4,074 -4 13,191 4,397 0 13 Dewsbury West 3 11,771 3,924 -7 12,758 4,253 -4 14 Golcar 3 12,884 4,295 2 13,606 4,535 3 15 Greenhead 3 13,305 4,435 5 13,375 4,458 1 16 Heckmondwike 3 12,173 4,058 -4 12,931 4,310 -2 17 Holme Valley North 3 12,423 4,141 -2 13,139 4,380 -1 18 Holme Valley South 3 13,525 4,508 7 14,662 4,887 11 19 Kirkburton 3 12,309 4,103 -3 12,953 4,318 -2 20 Lindley 3 13,182 4,394 4 13,816 4,605 4 21 Liversedge & 3 12,885 4,295 2 13,214 4,405 0 Gomersal 22 Mirfield 3 14,707 4,902 16 14,961 4,987 13 23 Newsome 3 12,746 4,429 1 12,838 4,279 -3 Totals 69 291,431 - - 304,666 - - Averages - - 4,224 - - 4,415 - Source: Electorate figures are based on information provided by Kirklees Metropolitan Council.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pockets of Excellence
    POCKETS OF EXCELLENCE Film Education in Yorkshire and the Humber 1 Contents Introduction and Approach 3 The National Film Education Landscape 4 Report: Pockets of Excellence 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 24 References 27 Acknowledgements 28 Report Authors Sarah Mumford - Director of Development, CapeUK Dr. Becky Parry - Lecturer in Childhood Studies, University of Leeds Geraldine Walker - Education Director, Reel Solutions The authors wish to thank CapeUK for their commitment to the research and determination to disseminate findings effectively and consult meaningfully. We look forward to the impact they will have in building bridges in the film education sector. The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance of those working in the sector, both those featured in the report and the many, many others whose work is not specifically mentioned but makes a vital contribution to the film education landscape in the region. June 2013 Front page image courtesy of Straight 8 2 Introduction and Approach As the Arts Council England (ACE) Bridge Organisation for Yorkshire and the Humber, CapeUK is charged with connecting children and young people with opportunities across the whole cultural spectrum, including increasing the uptake of both Artsmark and Arts Award across the region. Following the Henley Review of Cultural Learning, film is now part of this remit. This report is based on the findings from research carried out early in 2013 in response to a commission from CapeUK. The remit was to map the current film education provision in Yorkshire and the Humber, identifying strengths in the region, gaps in provision and opportunities for development. In addition the report asks how a stronger regional infrastructure, also linked to national initiatives, could be developed to support the expansion of film education for children and young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkheaton PO on the Move!
    Your FREE MAGAZINE for Kirkheaton, Upper Heaton, Gawthorpe, Bog Green, Briggate, Houses Hill, Wellhouse ISSUE 22 & Lascelles Hall NEWS AUTUMN 2018 Kirkheaton PO on the move! After over twenty five years as postmasters at Kirkheaton Post Office on St Mary’s Lane, Lynn and Michael Whitehouse are preparing to stick their last stamps, weigh their last parcels, close the PO and retire. Fortunately, Kirkheaton is not losing its PO. If all goes to plan it will relocate to the newsagents at the corner of Shop Lane and Town Road in the near future. However, this has caused some concern among residents as parking and pedestrian access are serious issues in the area. But on the plus side it will have two Bumper open counters and will be open for longer hours six and half days a week. Various other venues were considered but have issue! had to be discounted for varying reasons. NCS SUCCESS Michael became postmaster in April 1998 after a career as a mining surveyor. He commented “ When Margaret Thatcher THIRTY YEARS ON! closed down all the pits, my job disappeared, so I did what I always fancied doing - run a PO - which I’ve really enjoyed.” DALTON WARD During his 25 years at the job he has seen many changes. WEEKEND “Business has changed. At one time there were OAP’s queuing out of the door to collect their money on pension days. All that has gone now as pensions are paid directly into bank accounts. The government has also moved many of its services online so many people no longer renew their car tax or buy their TV licences etc at the PO.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    University of Huddersfield Repository Walker, Martyn Solid and practical education within reach of the humblest means’: the growth and development of the Yorkshire Union of Mechanics’ Institutes 1838–1891 Original Citation Walker, Martyn (2010) Solid and practical education within reach of the humblest means’: the growth and development of the Yorkshire Union of Mechanics’ Institutes 1838–1891. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/9087/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ ‘A SOLID AND PRACTICAL EDUCATION WITHIN REACH OF THE HUMBLEST MEANS’: THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE YORKSHIRE UNION OF MECHANICS’ INSTITUTES 1838–1891 MARTYN AUSTIN WALKER A thesis
    [Show full text]
  • Wakefield, West Riding: the Economy of a Yorkshire Manor
    WAKEFIELD, WEST RIDING: THE ECONOMY OF A YORKSHIRE MANOR By BRUCE A. PAVEY Bachelor of Arts Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1991 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS May, 1993 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY WAKEFIELD, WEST RIDING: THE ECONOMY OF A YORKSHIRE MANOR Thesis Approved: ~ ThesiSAd er £~ A J?t~ -Dean of the Graduate College ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am deeply indebted to to the faculty and staff of the Department of History, and especially the members of my advisory committee for the generous sharing of their time and knowledge during my stay at O.S.U. I must thank Dr. Alain Saint-Saens for his generous encouragement and advice concerning not only graduate work but the historian's profession in general; also Dr. Joseph Byrnes for so kindly serving on my committee at such short notice. To Dr. Ron Petrin I extend my heartfelt appreciation for his unflagging concern for my academic progress; our relationship has been especially rewarding on both an academic and personal level. In particular I would like to thank my friend and mentor, Dr. Paul Bischoff who has guided my explorations of the medieval world and its denizens. His dogged--and occasionally successful--efforts to develop my skills are directly responsible for whatever small progress I may have made as an historian. To my friends and fellow teaching assistants I extend warmest thanks for making the past two years so enjoyable. For the many hours of comradeship and mutual sympathy over the trials and tribulations of life as a teaching assistant I thank Wendy Gunderson, Sandy Unruh, Deidre Myers, Russ Overton, Peter Kraemer, and Kelly McDaniels.
    [Show full text]
  • The West Riding in the Late Seventeenth Century by David Hey
    Introduction: The West Riding in the Late Seventeenth Century by David Hey Not only was Yorkshire by far the largest of the ancient counties of England, at 1,709,307 acres, but the West Riding alone exceeded in size every other county except Lincolnshire. The word riding is derived from the late Old English ‘thrithing’ or ‘thriding’, itself adapted from an Old Norse loan word, meaning a third part. Wapentake, similarly derived, was the equivalent of the Anglo-Saxon hundred, and came from the symbolic flourishing of weapons to signify agreement when decisions were made in open-air assemblies at convenient sites, such as a river crossing or by a stone cross.1 The wapentakes continued to see to the levying of taxes, the raising of the militia and the maintenance of law and order and did not finally disappear until the reorganisation of local government in 1974. The West Riding was divided into eleven wapentakes: Ainsty, Agbrigg, Barkston Ash, Claro, Ewcross, Morley, Osgoldcross, Skyrack, Staincliffe, Staincross and Strafforth. The Ainsty, bounded by the rivers Ure, Ouse and Wharfe, had been annexed by Henry VI (d. 1471), king of England, to the city of York, as the county of the city, which was independent of all three ridings, but it was still considered to be a West Riding wapentake. The wapentakes were divided into townships, the vills of medieval documents. In the eastern parts of the West Riding many townships were coterminous with the ecclesiastical parishes and were referred to as parishes in the hearth tax returns, but the large moorland parishes in the west contained numerous townships.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzz-Novdec2017.Pdf
    Page 3 Why Bonfire Night? 4 The King’s Speech 5 ACross Country 7 Clouds 8 Vintners to the Church 9 Church News Board 10 Proclamation 11 Scarecrow invasion 14 Crossword 15 The Stamp of Approval 16 St Nicholas 17 Staring death in the face 19 Outsider’s good deed 20 What are you fantastic at? 21 Advent Calendars 22 Huddersfield Choral in Canada 24 New money 25 Holiday Quiz Yes, it’s November, so let us examine the origins of our annual immolation of a Catholic terrorist’s effigy on 5th November. We are all aware of the story of Guy Fawkes’ attempt to blow up Parliament, and that the lighting of celebratory November bonfires seems to have started as early as 1605 once the Gunpowder Plot was foiled. However, the earliest effigies on the fire were usually those of the Pope and the Devil, burned on Gunpowder Treason Day, as it used to be known. In 1677, one particularly grisly Pope effigy had its belly filled with live cats which “squalled most hideously as soon as they felt the fire,” which shows that not only was the tradition of Catholic effigy burning by then well-established, but that it was also getting rather out of hand. Indeed, in 1683 bonfires and fireworks were banned as liable to cause civil disruption. The tradition was revived with the accession of William of Orange in 1688, and over the next two centuries November 5th became Guy Fawkes’ Night and the effigies burned were of the traitor himself. So far, so familiar.
    [Show full text]
  • (NDP) 2016 – 2031 First Draft Plan for Public Consultation
    Holme Valley Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) 2016 – 2031 First Draft Plan for Public Consultation Prepared by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group with assistance from Holme Valley NDP – First Draft Plan for Public Consultation 2018 2 Table of Contents Foreword ............................................................................................... 3 How to Comment on this Document ................................................... 4 Executive Summary .............................................................................. 5 1.0 Introduction and Background ..................................................... 9 2.0 Planning Context for Holme Valley NDP ................................... 15 3.0 Holme Valley NDP Vision and Objectives ................................. 19 4.0 Holme Valley NDP Planning Policies ........................................ 21 4.1 Protecting Local Character ...................................................................... 22 4.2 Landscape Character Areas ..................................................................... 27 4.3 Conservation Areas .................................................................................. 37 4.4 Conserving and Enhancing Local Heritage Assets ............................... 53 4.5 Design of Development ............................................................................ 56 4.6 Design in town & local centres & public realm ....................................... 58 4.7 Building Housing for the Future .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Known World Heraldic Symposium
    Proceedings of the Known World Heraldic Symposium hosted by the Shire of Thamesreach 5−7 September, A.S. XLIII c 2008; all rights belong to the authors. Editor: Sara L. Uckelman Cover art by: Jen Fraser Table of Contents Preface .................................................................3 Commenting on oscar Juliana de Luna ........................................................5 Place names in Orkney from 16th- and 17th-century maps Lachlan of Cromarty ..................................................11 Heraldic titles: an overview Juliana de Luna ......................................................27 Locative and toponymic bynames in 13th- and 14th-century West York- shire Wenyeva atte grene ...................................................45 Names from The Itinerary of Benjamin of Tudela Eleazar ha-Levi .......................................................67 Names of property owners in northern Hungary, 1427 Kolosvari Arpadne Julia ..............................................79 Manuscript and e-text sources from northern Europe Anna de Byxe .........................................................93 Mein b¨uchlein—re-constructing D¨urer’ssketchbook Milesent Vibert .......................................................99 Medieval college “diplomas”: determination announcements at the Uni- versity of Vienna, a report and a reconstruction Johannes von Narrenstein ............................................111 Use of heraldry in the Luttrell Psalter Genevieve la flechiere de Duram .....................................123
    [Show full text]
  • SI/SR Template
    GS 1898 Draft Scheme prepared by the Dioceses Commission under section 6 of the Dioceses, Pastoral and Mission Measure 2007. REORGAN I SATION SCHEME MADE B Y T H E DIOCESES COMMISSION The Dioceses of Bradford, Ripon and Leeds and Wakefield Reorganisation Scheme 201- Made - - - - *** Laid before the General Synod in draft *** Coming into force in accordance with article 1 CONTENTS 1. Citation and commencement 2 2. Interpretation 2 3. Dissolution of dioceses of Bradford, Ripon and Leeds and Wakefield 4 4. Foundation of new bishopric and diocese of Leeds 4 5. Composition of new diocese of Leeds 4 6. Transfer of excluded parishes and benefices 4 7. Cathedrals 4 8. Pro-cathedral 5 9. Creation of suffragan bishoprics of Bradford and Huddersfield 5 10. Archdeaconries 5 11. Deaneries 6 12. Patronage 6 13. Patronage: supplementary provisions 7 14. Constitution of Diocesan Synod during transitional period 8 15. Duties of Diocesan Synod of new diocese 9 16. Dissolution of diocesan bodies of former dioceses 9 17. Abolition of offices in former dioceses 9 18. Filling of offices in new diocese 10 19. Records 10 20. Consistory courts 11 21. Property 11 22. Trusts 11 23. Property and trusts: supplementary provisions 12 24. Transfer of rights and liabilities etc. 13 25. Transitional Provisions 13 26. Repeals 13 27. Supplementary 13 SCHEDULES SCHEDULE 1 — Transfer of excluded parishes and benefices to receiving dioceses 15 SCHEDULE 2 — Cathedrals 15 PART 1 — Modification of 1999 Measure 15 PART 2 — Modification of Cathedral Constitutions 17 SCHEDULE 3
    [Show full text]
  • Living Conditions Edited 2020
    LIVING CONDITIONS 1830 - 1914 The Social History of Skelmanthorpe and District AUGUST 1, 2020 SKELMANTHORPE AND DISTRICT U3A Local History Group Table of Contents General Improvement .............................................................................................................. 1 Local Demographics ................................................................................................................ 2 A Very Brief History of C19 Local Government Institutions ....................................................... 9 Poverty .................................................................................................................................. 12 Diet ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Housing ................................................................................................................................. 20 Health .................................................................................................................................... 23 Lighting .................................................................................................................................. 28 Sanitation ............................................................................................................................... 29 Roads .................................................................................................................................... 32 Friendly Societies..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Design Codes
    MIRFIELD Neighbourhood Plan DESIGN CODES March 2021 MIRFIELD DESIGN CODES Quality information Document Ref Prepared for Prepared by Date Reviewed by name Upper Hopton DR-10935 Mirfield Neigh- Nick Beedie, 18.02.21 Christine Design Guide bourhood Plan Elliot Jodrell, Sykes - Mirfield Steering Group AECOM (NPSG) 03.03.21 John Wilkinson (Locality) Limitations This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. This document is intended to aid the preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan, and can be used to guide decision making and as evidence to support Plan policies, if the Qualifying Body (QB) so chooses. It is not a neighbourhood plan policy document. It was developed by AECOM based on the evidence and data reasonably available at the time of assessment and therefore has the potential to become superseded by more recent information. The QB is not bound to accept its conclusions. If landowners or any other party can demonstrate that any of the evidence presented herein is inaccurate or out of date, such evidence can be presented to the QB at the consultation stage. Where evidence from elsewhere conflicts with this report, the QB should decide what policy position to take in the Neighbourhood Plan and that judgement should be documented so that it can be defended at the Examination stage.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019/2020 and Report on How the Foundation Has Continued to Grow Over This Period
    Company registration number: 7100811 Charity registration number: 1135258 One Community Foundation Limited (A company limited by guarantee) Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2020 Lambert Roper & Horsfield Limited Chartered Accountant and Auditor First Floor Rosemount House Huddersfield Road Elland West Yorkshire HX5 0EE One Community Foundation Limited Contents Reference and Administrative Details 1 Chairman's Report 2 Trustees' Report 3 to 12 Statement of Financial Activities 13 to 14 Balance Sheet 15 to 16 Statement of Cash Flows 17 Notes to the Financial Statements 18 to 37 Independent Auditors' Report 38 to 40 One Community Foundation Limited Reference and Administrative Details Trustees I H Brierley, Chairman Sir J A Harman E Archer-Firth J R Charlesworth J P Garside J H Thornton J W Bell Mr N T Taylor Mr A Bewsher Principal Office c/o Chadwick Lawrence LLP 13 Railway Street Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD1 1JS Company Registration Number 7100811 Charity Registration Number 1135258 Solicitors Chadwick Lawrence LLP 13 Railway Street Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD1 1JS Bankers National Westminster Bank Plc 8 Market Place Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD1 2AL Auditor Lambert Roper & Horsfield Limited Chartered Accountant and Auditor First Floor Rosemount House Huddersfield Road Elland West Yorkshire HX5 0EE Fund Managers CCLA Investment Management Senator House 85 Queen Victoria Street London EC4V 4ET Financial Advisers Robertson Baxter Limited The Mill, 150 Penistone Road Shelley Huddersfield HD8 8JQ Page 1 One Community Foundation Limited Chairman's Report for the Year Ended 31 March 2020 I’m delighted to present the annual report and accounts of One Community Foundation for 2019/2020 and report on how the Foundation has continued to grow over this period.
    [Show full text]