Annual Report 2019 45,000People in Detention Challenging Immigration Detention in the United Kingdom

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2019 45,000People in Detention Challenging Immigration Detention in the United Kingdom www.biduk.org Bail for Immigration Detainees is an independent charity that exists to challenge immigration detention in the UK. We work with asylum seekers and migrants in removal 20 years supporting over centres and prisons, to secure their release from detention. Annual Report 2019 45,000people in detention Challenging Immigration detention in the United Kingdom Bail for Immigration Detainees “Over the course of our inquiry, we have found serious problems with almost every element of the immigration detention system. People are being wrongfully detained, held in immigration detention What is immigration What does Specifically, we: when they are vulnerable and detained for detention? BID do? Anyone subject to immigration BID’s vision is of a world free • Run a telephone helpline four too long… too often the Home Office has control in the UK can be of immigration detention, mornings a week to deliver legal detained. It is an administrative where people are not deprived advice and information and not a criminal process. of their liberty for immigration shown a shockingly cavalier attitude to • Deliver legal advice sessions and There are none of the safeguards purposes. We aim to challenge workshops in detention centres and that there should be when immigration detention in the prisons the deprivation of human liberty and the depriving someone of their UK through the provision liberty. First, the decision to of legal advice, information • Prepare, update and disseminate protection of people’s basic rights.” detain an individual is taken by and representation alongside self-help materials on detention and an immigration officer and not research, policy advocacy deportation so that detainees have the (Home Affairs Select Committee 2019 Report overseen by a court. Second, and strategic litigation. tools to represent themselves if they on Immigration Detention) there is no automatic legal don’t have a lawyer advice or representation. Third, there is no time limit. Given • Prepare court cases for release on bail and deportation appeals these three factors, people can be detained for weeks, months • Carry out research, gather evidence and even years. People can also from casework, and prepare reports be re-detained, but the Home and briefings for civil servants, Office treats these as separate parliamentarians and the general periods of detention and does public about different aspects of not count cumulative lengths immigration detention of detention. Many people experience repeated periods of • Refer cases for unlawful detention detention. actions • Act as a third party intervener, or provide evidence to the higher courts on detention policy and practice • Raise awareness of immigration detention with the wider public “ BID really supported me a lot while I was in detention because they literally went to represent me for bail lots of times. Which was really, really helpful. Having people like that is going to allow more people to be able to fight for their rights.” Client 3 Challenging Immigration detention in the United Kingdom Chair’s Report Director’s report At a time when less and oral and written evidence. less seems to shock, it is BID has spent twenty years A range of different articles still unbelievable that the carefully documenting and appeared in the press, including UK exposes fellow human researching every aspect of a week’s focus on immigration beings to the degradation immigration detention policy detention in the Guardian, as of immigration detention. and practice, becoming an well as the tireless work carried Despite all the uncertainty acknowledged expert in the out by Amelia Gentleman in around Brexit, BID continues, field. BID staff through the exposing what had happened as it has done for 20 years, to years have briefed journalists to the Windrush generation. support those left vulnerable and politicians, worked BID worked behind the scenes by immigration detention. I tirelessly to influence civil to brief journalists and to assist know from the comments we servants and have borne witness with information and contacts receive from clients how much to some tangible changes – for wherever possible, and yet they appreciate what BID has example with the ending of again, BID appeared in the press done to help them at their time the detention of children in an impressive number of times. of need. The nature and range 2010. Notwithstanding the The reduction in numbers of our work is becoming more very real political difficulties of people being detained complex as we broaden the type that the country currently faces, also meant a corresponding of support we give to clients Amid all the political BID continues to advocate for reduction in the number of beyond basic bail advice and turbulence with which we were those who are detained and people that BID was able to the team continues to amaze all surrounded during 2018/19, continues to hope for, and support, but this also resulted with the quality of the work it a significant anniversary took strive for, a brighter future in providing a more in-depth delivers. place. 2019 marked twenty – our vision is for a world service to those clients who years of BID’s existence. without immigration detention were representing themselves On behalf of the Board I would Chair of Trustees Sandeep Katwala at our Anti-Birthday event marking BID’s 20th Anniversary For those inspirational and and those who work for, and who we were unable to take on like to thank Pierre Makhlouf committed people who volunteer for BID combine their for our represented service. for standing in so ably while founded BID, it must have energies to this end. Celia recovers from illness been unimaginable that the Whatever the future holds for and also to all the other staff “ In the quarter until 4 February 2018, organisation would continue One of the noticeable changes the UK, BID will continue and volunteers who work so only 45 per cent of those leaving to be around twenty years in the last year was the to push for an end to the incredibly hard to support our from then. At the heart of the reduction in the numbers of barbaric system of immigration clients. I also want to thank the detention estate were removed founders’ approach was the people being detained. While detention that has caused the Board who freely give their from the country – the rest were idea that they would not only the cynic in us feared that this so many such suffering and time and energy to support get people out of detention, might be an attempt to “clear hardship. Thank you to all of BID. And finally, none of this is released. While I welcome the overall but in conjunction with that, the decks” in preparation for you who have assisted us in the possible without the financial decrease in the numbers of those would persuade politicians that the detention of EEA nationals journey so far – we hope we and broader support you, our immigration detention was in the event of the UK leaving can count on you to continue supporters, give to BID. Thank detained, these figures continue to not only cruel and inhumane, the EU, we also hoped that to support us in the future. We you. call into question the extent to which but utterly unnecessary in the it was in response to greater need you. operation of an asylum and public scrutiny – particularly Sandeep Katwala, Chair the current use of detention is cost immigration system. Sadly, in parliament, but also in Celia Clarke, Director despite BID consistently the media – of immigration effective or necessary.” advocating for an end to detention. Condemnation for Assessment of government progress in implementing detention, the system expanded the system was wholehearted the report on the welfare in detention of vulnerable persons, and became ever more from both the Home Affairs entrenched over the years, with Stephen Shaw, July 2018 Select Committee and the Joint an expansion of the so-called Committee for Human Rights, detention “estate” along with its to which BID had given both privatisation. 4 Bail for Immigration Detainees Annual Report 2019 5 Challenging Immigration detention in the United Kingdom Bail casework and outreach Comments A sample of clients’ comments In the past year BID staff and Until this last year our “DIY” volunteers have supported a scheme (helping detainees apply Achievements total of 4,161 people. Most for bail themselves) scheme clients receive legal advice with provided advice and support a smaller proportion being to help detainees improve directly represented by BID. their own bail applications by “BID got me out of detention Staff and volunteers prepared sending them advice letters. after paying £700 to [another] “No words could ever express 522 bail applications. Of these, In the last year we have begun lawyer. The lawyer never how thankful I am.” 375 were heard in court and to help people by preparing 4161individuals provided with assistance 222 of resulted in a grant of bail their grounds for bail and applied for bail.” with an overall success rate of gathering evidence so that they 59%. A total of 107 workshops/ are better prepared to represent legal advice sessions were themselves. This has been delivered to 1,208 people in very positively received and 6 prisons and 7 immigration we are now opening a higher 525bail applications prepared, 375 actually heard; 222 removal centres (IRCs). percentage of files for our DIY released on bail “They are lovely, We try and keep track of people clients than we have done respectful, kind people. who we have advised although previously. “Very, very, very helpful.” this can be difficult as they are Thank you.” sometimes moved, or removed. A minimum of 510 people 59%success rate for represented cases provided with assistance from “Everything was BID were released.
Recommended publications
  • JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London
    JUSTICE Human Rights Law Conference 2018 10 October 2018, London • Unmissable human rights CPD event for 2018 • Keynote speeches from leaders in the field • Workshops on criminal justice, women’s human rights, earn judicial review, immigration and asylum, privacy, security and 6 cpd surveillance and life, death and human rights hours • The latest domestic and international human rights case-law • All income supports the work of JUSTICE Plenary speeches from: Panel sessions with: • Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill • Michael Fordham QC • Karon Monaghan QC • Harriet Wistrich • Angela Rafferty QC • Baroness Shami Chakrabarti • Nathalie Lieven QC • Max Hill QC • + many others to be confirmed follow us on twitter @justicehq PROGRAMME OF THE DAY Join JUSTICE 9.00 REGISTRATION AND REFRESHMENTS JUSTICE is an all-party law reform and human rights organisation working to strengthen the justice system – administrative, civil and 9.30 CHAIR’S WELCOME criminal – in the United Kingdom. Andrea Coomber, Director, JUSTICE 9.45 MORNING KEYNOTE ADDRESS: JUSTICE is independent JUSTICE is expert JUSTICE is influential Lord Carnwath of Notting Hill 10.15 REVIEW OF THE YEAR JUSTICE is effective JUSTICE is international Karon Monaghan QC, Matrix Chambers 11.00 COFFEE JUSTICE relies on the support of its members and donors for the funds to carry out its vital work. Please join us today. 11.30 MORNING WORKSHOPS 1. Criminal Justice and Human Rights 14.00 AFTERNOON WORKSHOPS “Access to justice, human rights and the rule of law – as a lawyer and as a Chair: HH Peter Rook QC democrat, I can think of few causes more important to defend and extend.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CIRCUITEER Issue 45 / July 2018 1 News from the South Eastern Circuit
    News from the South Eastern Circuit THE CIRCUITEER INSIDE THIS ISSUE 03 16 10 16 Leader’s Sir Desmond Ramiz Bar Council Protocol for Report de Silva Gürsoy Court Sitting Hours JUSTICE – Mental health A working party of JUSTICE members and invited experts met to consider the issue of Mental Health and Fair Trial. by Jodie Blackstock p4 Keble Advanced Advocacy Course WOMEN AT by Bibi Badejo THE BAR p11 p7 by Sally Hobson WELLBEING by Kerim Fuad QC p13 Particularly in these unsettled times, the wellbeing of all those involved at the Bar is of increased importance. THE CIRCUITEER Issue 45 / July 2018 1 News from the South Eastern Circuit EDITOR’S COLUMN Karim Khalil QC ow we know – football isn’t “coming home” … anyone with a Whether traditional chambers structures are ‘fit for purpose’ is moderately realistic view of the ‘beautiful game’ (however attracting more attention than ever before: the recent publication Nugly it is) would have known it and betted against it: but of a book on the topic has served to underline how complicated our summer of sunshine led us to dream and hope ‘against all the the management of our profession has become. Meanwhile, odds’ that something might turn out better than we thought. most are abiding by the adage to ‘Stay Calm and Carry On’ – after all, that is what we do. So it is with our system of public Justice – time and again promises are made and excitement is generated … to believe that I hope that everyone has a decent break over the summer, even we can effect real changes for the better only for those hopes though we no longer have a period of Court closure to match to be plunged into the despair of ‘real politic’ and the ugly truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Economic Crime - a Shared Responsibility!
    THIRTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ECONOMIC CRIME SUNDAY 1st SEPTEMBER - SUNDAY 8th SEPTEMBER 2019 JESUS COLLEGE, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE Fighting economic crime - a shared responsibility! Centre of Development Studies The 37th Cambridge International Symposium on Economic Crime Fighting economic crime- a shared responsibility! The thirty-seventh international symposium on economic crime brings together, from across the globe, a unique level and depth of expertise to address one of the biggest threats facing the stability and development of all our economies. The overarching theme for the symposium is how we can better and more effectively work together in preventing, managing and combating the threat posed by economically motivated crime and abuse. The programme underlines that this is not just the responsibility of the authorities, but us all. These important and timely issues are considered in a practical, applied and relevant manner, by those who have real experience whether in law enforcement, regulation, compliance or simply protecting their own or another’s business. The symposium, albeit held in one of the world’s leading universities, is not a talking shop for those with vested interests or for that matter an academic gathering. We strive to offer a rich and deep analysis of the real issues and in particular threats to our institutions and economies presented by economic crime and abuse. Well over 700 experts from around the world will share their experience and knowledge with other participants drawn from policy makers, law enforcement, compliance, regulation, business and the professions. The programme is drawn up with the support of a number of agencies and organisations across the globe and the Organising Institutions and principal sponsors greatly value this international commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law
    - List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law June 2019 Health & Safety Executive (HSE), Environment Agency (EA), Office of Rail and Road (ORR), Natural Resources Wales (NRW), Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), Care Quality Commission (CQC) 1 List A Region Counsel Call Address Telephone/Fax London & South ADJEI, Cyril 1995 Old Square Chambers, 11 Bedford Row, Tel: 020 7269 0300 East London, WC1R 4BU (DX 1046 London/Chancery Lane) London & South BADGER, Christopher 2002 6 Pump Court, Temple, London , EC4Y 7AR Tel: 020 7797 8400 East (DX 293 LDE) Fax: 020 7797 8401 London & South BALYSZ, Mark 1995 Crown Office Chambers, 2 Crown Office Row, Tel: 020 7797 8100 East Temple, London ,EC4Y 7HJ Fax: 020 7797 8101 (DX 80 London Chancery Lane) London & South BANWELL, Richard 1998 6 Pump Court, Temple, London , EC4Y 7AR Tel: 020 7797 8400 East (DX 293 LDE) Fax: 020 7797 8401 London & South BATES, Pascal 1994 6 Pump Court, Temple, London , EC4Y 7AR Tel: 020 7797 8400 East (DX 293 LDE) Fax: 020 7797 8401 London & South BEYNON, Richard 1990 Red Lion Chambers, 18 Red Lion Court, Tel: 020 7520 6000 East Temple, London, EC4A 3EB Fax: 020 7520 6248/9 (DX 478, London/Chancery Lane) London & South BUTT, Matthew 2002 3 Raymond Buildings, Gray's Inn, Tel: 020 7400 6400 East London , WC1R 5BH Fax: 020 7400 6464 (DX 237 LDE) London & South CHARBIT, Valerie 1992 Red Lion Chambers, 18 Red Lion Court, Tel: 020 7520 6000 East Temple, London, EC4A 3EB Fax: 020 7520 6248/9 (DX 478, London/Chancery Lane) London & South CROWE,
    [Show full text]
  • Complaints Form Complaints Against Mambers of Staff
    Complaints Form Complaints against Mambers of Staff Section 1: Your Details Your full name: Your address (including postcode): Your daytime telephone number: Your email address: If you are complaining on behalf of another person, please name that person: Section 2: The Staff Member’s details Staff Member’s full name: Are you raisingthe complaint as … a solicitor / legal professional? YES NO a member of the public? YES NO a clerk from another chambers? YES NO Were you instructing or attempting to instruct a barrister? YES NO If you know the name of the barrister, please indicate who this was: Section 3: Details of the case Name of the case: Name of the court: Date of hearing: W: www.redlionchambers.co.uk Complaints against Members of Staff 01 E: [email protected] T: 0207 520 6000 Section 4: Your complaint Please describe briefly the reasons for your complaint ( continue on additional sheets and attach if necessary ) Are there any other witnesses who can provide relevant information about the complaint? If so please provide their details: When did the events complained about take place? If the events complained about occured more than six months ago, please explain briefly why there has been a delay in notifying the complaint: Are you seeking a specific form of resolution to your complaint? W: www.redlionchambers.co.uk Complaints against Members of Staff 02 E: [email protected] T: 0207 520 6000 The complainant should sign below. If the complaint is lodged on behalf of the complainant by a representative, both the complainant and the representative should sign.
    [Show full text]
  • IILP Review 2014: the State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession © 2014 Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession All Rights Reserved
    IILP Review 2014: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession © 2014 Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession All rights reserved. IILP Review 2014: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession IILP Review 2014 •••• 1 Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief Elizabeth Chambliss Editorial Board Robert T. Cichocki Brian W. Duwe Sharon E. Jones Sandra S. Yamate Articles Editors Chelsea J. Clark Amanda Reasoner Editorial Assistants Janet J. Lee Michelle Musielewicz The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author of each article or essay and not necessarily those of the Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profes- sion or the employer of any author. Any individuals who may be quoted in specific articles and who are identified in connection with their employer are not representing the views, opinions, or positions of their employer unless that representation is specifically noted. 2 •••• IILP Review 2014 Table of Contents 8 Letter from the Chair 9 Letter from the Editor-in-Chief 10 Letter from The Claro Group 11 About IILP 11 About the IILP Review: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession 13 Demographic Summary by Elizabeth Chambliss 37 The Dean Scene by Chelsea J. Clark 38 Explaining the Bar By Numbers: Diversity Challenges at the Bar for England and Wales By Sam Mercer 46 Diversity in the Legal Profession of England and Wales By Nicholas Fluck Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession in General 57 Fisher v. University of Texas: Surviving Scrutiny in a Post-Fisher World By Melinda S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bar Council Integrity
    Annual Bar Conference and Young Bar Conference 2015 Saturday 17 October 2015 Westminster Park Plaza, London Book by Friday 3 July 2015 to receive the early booking discounts The Bar Council Integrity. Excellence. Justice. Programme 09:30 - 10:30 This year’s theme has been developed to ecompass issues that are both current and important. The Advocate: Our role in the The opening keynote session will set the tone to ensure a full day of balance between state and sessions focussing and addressing the increasing pressures facing the Programme Programme citizen. Bar due to economic or other political pressures, as well as a widening of Welcome alternative services available to the public. Kama Melly, Conference Chairman, Park Square The Keynote Address will ensure the importance of maintaining ‘The Barristers Advocate’ as the focus in all discussions, with regards to what the Chairman’s Address elements of change or restrictions mean for members of the Bar and Alistair MacDonald QC, Chairman of the Bar how they can be used as an advantage or overcome to ensure continual Council success. Keynote Address Baroness Helena Kennedy of the Shaws QC 09:30 - 10:30 The bringing together of the two Conferences provides a fantastic opportunity for the Young Bar to take part in a day that provides Young Bar Opening Keynote learning opportunities from many sectors. However, the day is also Welcome about addressing areas of concern or potential areas of development that Daniel Sternberg, 9-12 Bell Yard, Young Bar are specific for the Young Bar. Committee Chairman Sir Terence Etherton was called to the Bar in 1974, Grays Inn.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Law Final Honours School Prize Winners 2017
    Faculty of Law Final Honours School Prize Winners 2017 Prize Candidate Name College Wronker Prize (Overall Best Performance) 1 of 2 Alexander Georgiou Brasenose College Wronker Prize (Overall Best Performance) 2 of 2 Samuel Dayan St John's College Wronker Proxime (Second Best Performance) 1 of 2 Rachel Griffin Trinity College Wronker Proxime (Second Best Performance) 2 of 2 Paul Fradley Brasenose College The D’Sousa Prize (Senior Status) (Overall best 2nd BA) Raphael Tulkens University College DLS Prize (Overall Best Performance) Joyce Esser St Anne's College 3 Verulam Buildings Prize in Commercial Law Alexander Georgiou Brasenose College 5 Stone Building Prize for Trusts Paul Fradley Brasenose College All Souls Prize for Public International Law Sebastian Bates Keble College Allen & Overy Prize in European Union Law Samuel Dayan St John's College Falcon Chambers Prize for Land Law Samuel Dayan St John's College Francis Taylor Building Prize in Environmental Law Sam Hancock The Queen's College Law Faculty Prize for Copyright, Patents and Allied Rights Rachel Griffin Trinity College Law Faculty Prize for Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights Daron Tan St Anne’s College Law Faculty Prize for Criminal Law Matthew Marchello Keble College Law Faculty Prize in International Trade David Kasal Pembroke College Law Faculty Prize for Human Rights Law Matthew Moriarty Somerville College Law Faculty Prize for Medical Law and Ethics Rio Hoe Harris Manchester College Law Faculty Prize for Moral and Political Philosophy Nicholas Bushnell-Wye Mansfield
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE Annual Report 2017
    JUSTICE Annual Report 2016 – 2017 1 JUSTICE ANNUAL REPORT 2016 – 2017 60 years of strengthening the justice system JUSTICE Annual Report 2016 – 2017 2 JUSTICE Annual Report 2016 – 2017 3 ESTABLISHED IN 1957, JUSTICE IS OUR VISION AND MISSION AN ALL-PARTY LAW REFORM AND We contribute to achieving our vision in three key ways: HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANISATION We are a membership organisation, WORKING TO STRENGTHEN OUR VISION IS OF FAIR, primarily of the legal profession, PROVIDING EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS comprising of judges, barristers, solicitors, 1 AND PROPOSING PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS TO THE JUSTICE SYSTEM – ACCESSIBLE AND EFFICIENT legal executives, academics and interested LAWMAKERS, JUDGES AND RELEVANT PUBLIC SERVANTS. non-lawyers. ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL AND LEGAL PROCESSES, IN WHICH Through our membership, we have strong connections with political decision-makers STRENGTHENING THE LAW AND LEGAL PROCESSES CRIMINAL – IN THE UK. THE INDIVIDUAL’S RIGHTS and the judiciary, and we work closely BY REFERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL AND with both. 2 COMPARATIVE BEST PRACTICE, LOOKING ACROSS JURISDICTIONS, ACROSS TYPES OF LAW AND ARE PROTECTED, AND WHICH OUR MEMBERS ARE CRITICAL TO ACROSS THE LEGAL PROFESSION. REFLECT THE COUNTRY’S JUSTICE’S SUCCESS. THEY HELP SHAPE OUR PRIORITIES; THEIR USING THE EXPERTISE OF OUR MEMBERSHIP EXPERTISE AND PERSPECTIVE ARE INTERNATIONAL REPUTATION 3 TO STRENGTHEN OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE A VALUABLE RESOURCE TO OUR CHALLENGES ARISING IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM AND FOR UPHOLDING AND STAFF; AND THEY INCREASE OUR OF POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS, WORKING WITH MEMBERS INFLUENCE. WE ALSO NEED OUR TO EXECUTE OUR VISION. PROMOTING THE RULE OF LAW. MEMBERS’ SUPPORT TO MAINTAIN A SUSTAINABLE FUNDING BASE FOR OUR WORK.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Research Paper on Sentencing Guidelines.Pdf
    Research and Information Service Briefing Note Paper 000/00 5 December 2016 NIAR 494-16 RaISe 1 Introduction This briefing paper has been prepared for the Committee for Justice. The Committee requested information on the following: Details of the membership of the Sentencing Council in England and Wales Details of the membership of the Lord Chief Justice’s Sentencing Group in Northern Ireland Whether the Sentencing Council in England and Wales and the Sentencing Group in Northern Ireland can comment on the availability of bail and bail conditions for different types of offences The costs associated with both the Sentencing Council in England and Wales and the Sentencing Group in Northern Ireland Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly 1 NIAR 494-16 Briefing Note 2 Issues Details of the membership of the Sentencing Council in England and Wales All judicial appointments are made by the Lord Chief Justice with the agreement of the Lord Chancellor whilst non-judicial appointments are made by the Lord Chancellor with the agreement of the Lord Chief Justice following open competition1. Figure 1: Membership of the Sentencing Council Member Biographical information The Right Honourable Lord Thomas Lord Chief Justice John Thomas is the president of the Sentencing Council. In of England and Wales his role he provides oversight to the Council and appoints judicial members. He became Lord Chief Justice on 1 . October 2013. He was called to the Bar by Gray’s Inn in 1969 and became a Queen’s Counsel in 1984. He was appointed an Assistant Recorder in 1984 and a Recorder in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Inside Out' 674..Pdf
    Miscarriages of JusticeUK (MOJUK) 22 Berners St, Birmingham B19 2DR The Supreme Court addressed five issues on appeal: (i) how far a Magistrates’ Court, on Tele: 0121- 507 0844 Email: [email protected] Web: www.mojuk.org.uk an ex parte application for a search and seizure warrant under ss.8 and 15(3) of PACE, can rely on information which in the public interest cannot be disclosed to the subject of the war - MOJUK: Newsletter ‘Inside Out’ No 674 (08/02/2018) - Cost £1 rant; (ii) whether in proceedings for judicial review of the legality of a search warrant, issued ex parte under ss. 8 and 15(3) of PACE (a) it is permissible for the High Court to have regard R (Haralambous) (Appellant) v Crown Court at St Albans and another to evidence upon which the warrant was issued which is not disclosed to the subject of the On appeal from the QBD Divisional Court (England and Wales) warrant and (b) whether, where a Magistrates’ Court is permitted to consider evidence not dis - This appeal arises in relation to search and seizure warrants issued by the St. Albans closable to the subject of the warrant, but the High Court is not, it follows that the warrant must Magistrates’ Court in the absence of the appellant on 16 June 2014. These were executed on be quashed if the disclosable material is insufficient on its own to justify the warrant; (iii) 26 June 2014, and on 16 September 2014 materials on which the police had relied in obtain - whether there is jurisdiction in a Crown Court to rely on evidence not disclosable to the sub - ing the warrants were provided to the appellant in redacted form.
    [Show full text]
  • Download: Spending Over £500 February 2019: File Type
    Organisation name Organisation Code Directorate Service Category label Service Category code Supplier name Payment date Transaction number Net Amount Purpose of spend Procurement category name Southend-on-Sea Borough Council http://www.opendatacommunities.org/id/unitary-authority/southend Department for Place Highways and Transport Services 9003 (G) Concrete Repairs Limited 01/02/2019 12062088 6,581.99 Main Contractor Main Contractor Southend-on-Sea Borough Council http://www.opendatacommunities.org/id/unitary-authority/southend Department for Place Cultural And Related Services 4263 (G) H2O Nationwide Limited 01/02/2019 12062088 571.00 Repairs And Maintenance Contracts Repairs, alterations and maintenance of buildings Southend-on-Sea Borough Council http://www.opendatacommunities.org/id/unitary-authority/southend Department for Place Highways And Transport Services 5234 (G) R & A Mechanical Services Ltd 01/02/2019 12062088 780.00 Repairs And Maintenance Contracts Repairs, alterations and maintenance of buildings Southend-on-Sea Borough Council http://www.opendatacommunities.org/id/unitary-authority/southend Department for People Children And Education Services 3186 Ac Radio Cabs 01/02/2019 12062088 6,903.75 Private Contractors Other Agencies Southend-on-Sea Borough Council http://www.opendatacommunities.org/id/unitary-authority/southend Department for People Children And Education Services 3265 Ac Radio Cabs 01/02/2019 12062088 809.88 Conveyance of Clients Contract Hire And Operating Leases Southend-on-Sea Borough Council http://www.opendatacommunities.org/id/unitary-authority/southend
    [Show full text]