DOCSLIB.ORG

The Experience of Unep Gef and Partners in Flyway Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Experience of Unep Gef and Partners in Flyway Conservation UNEP GEF PORTFOLIO OUTLOOK AND EVOLUTION THE EXPERIENCE OF UNEP GEF AND PARTNERS IN FLYWAY CONSERVATION BIODIVERSITY ISSUE PAPER BD/001 Copyright © 2009, United Nations Environment Programme - Division of Global Environment Suggested citation: Facility Coordination (UNEP/DGEF) The Experience of UNEP GEF and Partners in Flyway Conservation, 2009. UNEP GEF Portfolio Outlook Disclaimers: and Evolution. Biodiversity Issue Paper The content and views expressed in this publication do not necessarily refl ect the views or policies of BD/001. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. the contributory organizations or the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and neither do they imply any endorsement. Publisher: The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression UNEP / DGEF of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. Lead authors and editors: Mention of an entity or product in this publication does not imply the endorsement of UNEP. Edoardo Zandri & Crawford Prentice © Tamer Yilmaz (Sunset in Burdur, Turkey) Credits: Copyright of all maps, photos and illustrations as specifi ed individually. Contributing authors: Leon Bennun, Gerard Boere, Tim CONTENTS Reproduction: Dodman, Max Zieren, Jonathan Barnard, Ward Hagemeijer, Camillo This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profi t Ponziani, James Harris, Taej Mundkur, purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source Claire Mirande, Umberto Gallo-Orsi, FOREWORD p.6 is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a Bert Lenten, Sergey Dereliev, Florian source. Keil, Douglas Hykle, Francisco Rilla, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY p.7 Nick Davidson No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from UNEP. Applications for such permission, with a statement of purpose DEFINITIONS AND SCOPE p.9 and intent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Division of Communications and Public Contributing agencies: Information (DCPI), UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. UNEP / GEF ACHIEVEMENTS IN GEF 3 & 4 p.9 UNOPS International Crane Foundation The use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products for publicity or advertising INTERNATIONAL ENABLING p.13 Convention on Migratory Species is not permitted. ENVIRONMENT African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement Ramsar Convention on Wetlands MAIN LESSONS LEARNED p.14 Produced by: BirdLife International United Nations Environment Programme Wetlands International Division of Global Environment Facility Coordination THE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE p.30 Biodiversity & Natural Resources Unit OF UNEP P.O. Box 30552 (00100) Layout & design: OUTLINE OF POSSIBLE NEW p.30 Nairobi, Kenya Camillo Ponziani GEF INITIATIVES Visit us on the web: www.unep.org For additional information ANNEX I: LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS p.33 please visit: ANNEX II: RELEVANT BACKGROUND p.34 www.unep.org DOCUMENTS www.wingsoverwetlands.org www.scwp.info Printed on recycled, acid-free paper © Jonathan Barnard, BirdLife International (Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands) © Jonathan Barnard, BirdLife International Biodiversity Issue Paper BD/001: The Experience of UNEP GEF and Partners in Flyway Conservation Biodiversity Issue Paper BD/001: The Experience of UNEP GEF and Partners in Flyway Conservation ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS PARTNERS AND DONORS AEWA African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement The drafting of this issue paper has been a highly participatory and collaborative process, in which many CMS Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals partners and donors have been engaged. COP Conference of the Parties CSN Critical Site Network EA Executing Agency EAAFP East Asian - Australasian Flyway Partnership FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FWG Flyway Working Group GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographical Information System IA Implementing Agency ICF International Crane Foundation IIT International Implementation Tasks IT Information Technology LULUCF Land Use, Land Use Change and Forests M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MEA Multi-lateral Environmental Agreements MOP Meeting of the Parties MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTE Mid-Term Evaluation NEA National Executing Agency NGO Non Governmental Organisation PIR Project Implementation Report RAF Resource Allocation Framework SCWP Siberian Crane Wetland Project SMART Specifi c Measurable Achievable Realistic and Time-bound TOR Terms of Reference UN United Nations UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNOPS United Nations Offi ce for Project Services UN-REDD United Nations programme for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation USA United States of America UNEP WCMC World Conservation Monitoring Centre WHSRN Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network WOW Wings Over Wetlands (UNEP/GEF African-Eurasian Flyways Project) Page 4 Page 5 Biodiversity Issue Paper BD/001: The Experience of UNEP GEF and Partners in Flyway Conservation Biodiversity Issue Paper BD/001: The Experience of UNEP GEF and Partners in Flyway Conservation groups as well as to trans-boundary conservation FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY issues in general. The two projects are rather different, and comple- mentary, in their scope and emphasis. The African- The “Flyway Approach” has become a key concept strengthened among key stakeholders, as a result Two major regional initiatives1 focusing on the Eurasian Flyways Project (‘Wings over Wetlands’, guiding the development of international initiatives of this and other recent efforts supported by the fl yway-level conservation of migratory birds and or WOW) covers a wide range of countries, with for fl yway-scale conservation covering many dif- UNEP GEF: a good sign and a reason for optimism their habitats are currently being successfully a strong focus on developing regional tools with ferent migratory bird species in many parts of the on the validity and potential of the fl yway conser- implemented by UNEP GEF in collaboration with broad applicability. The Siberian Crane Wetland world. vation approach. a wide range of partners, all of whom have Project (SCWP) covers four countries along two contributed to the development of this paper.2 main fl yways, showing how more focused fl yway For the past several years, these international ef- The way ahead is complex, and challenges are These initiatives cover over 122 countries, with efforts – still spanning large distances but involv- forts to conserve migratory waterbirds have been increasingly diffi cult in the face of climate change direct fi eld activities at more than 28 sites span- ing smaller numbers of countries and bird species given an unprecedented boost through the WOW and increased human-induced pressures on our ning 16 countries. We draw upon lessons learned – can achieve outcomes that may be diffi cult for Project and the Siberian Crane Wetland Project. planet. so far in the design and implementation of these more complex and diverse projects. The results of two innovative projects, not only as a basis for both projects provide valuable lessons on the way Both have become a model internationally for fl y- Our direction is also increasingly clear, and new the consolidation of experiences, but also for the forward with fl yway conservation initiatives. way initiatives in other regions showing how “The “fl yway” projects are already on the drawing expansion of this important area of biodiversity Flyway Approach” can be put into practice. These board for possible future funding by GEF and other and habitat conservation work. Notwithstanding Important new conservation tools are being projects are a unique example of the broad part- donors, on the basis of our recent experience. the focus on fl yways and migratory birds, there generated by both projects. The “Critical Site nerships that characterise UNEP’s support to multi- are some important lessons learned that are It is our hope that these initiatives will lead to Network Tool” contributes to improving our con- national efforts in the conservation of biodiversity quite relevant also to other migratory species servation planning capacity at the local, national and natural resources further investments in the wise-use of wetland resources and to better conservation of migratory The UNEP GEF team is committed to continue to waterbirds worldwide. support this approach, and the commendable efforts of all stakeholders in fl yway conservation. We look forward to avenues for consolidating and expanding the scope of this and other recent successful fl yway Maryam Niamir-Fuller conservation initiatives in our UNEP GEF project GEF Executive Coordinator and Director portfolio. We are also glad to note that existing Division of Global Environment Facility Coordination fl yway conservation partnerships are being United Nations Environment Programme © Camillo Ponziani (Namga-Kokorou Complex, Niger) (Namga-Kokorou © Camillo Ponziani © Gábor Simay (Ferruginous Duck) © Gábor Simay (Ferruginous 1. Namely: the UNEP/GEF “Siberian Crane Wetland” Project and the UNEP/GEF “African-Eurasian Flyways” Project. 2. A third GEF Flyways project – the “Migratory Soaring Birds” project is executed by BirdLife International through UNDP. This is not formally part of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • II Congresso Internacional As Aves 2018
    EVOLUÇÃO Revista de Geistória e Pré-História SÉRIE I, Nº. 2, VOLUME 1 LISBOA. MAIO. 2018 EVOLUÇÃO - Revista de Geistória e Pré-História. 2 (1).2018 CENTRO PORTUGUÊS DE GEO-HISTÓRIA E PRÉ-HISTÓRIA O Centro Português de Geo-História e Pré-História é uma associação sem fins lucrativos Fundada em 15 de fevereiro de 1995, é reconhecida como Entidade de Utilidade Pública desde 2017. Tem por objetivos o fomento e o desenvolvimento de atividades de investigação e de divulgação nos campos científicos da Geo- História e Pré-História. CONCELHO CIENTÍFICO DO CPGP: Paleontologia / Estratigrafia / Paleobotânica: Silvério Figueiredo; Mário Mendes; Pedro Proença Cunha; Ioanna Bachtsevanidou Strantzali Pré-História / Arte Rupestre: Telmo Pereira; Luís Raposo; Luiz Oosterbeek; Fernando Coimbra Geografia Rita Anastácio EVOLUÇÃO. REVISTA DE GEISTÓRIA E PRÉ-HISTÓRIA A Evolução. Revista de Geistória e Pré-História é uma revista de divulgação Científica, publicada pelo Centro Português de Geo-História e Pré-História e tem por objetivo principal contribuir para o desenvolvimento da divulgação científica, através da publicação de artigos e de trabalhos de investigação, divulgação e informação, de autores ou investigadores nacionais ou estrangeiros, nas áreas da Geistória e da Pré-História, podendo estes artigos ser de âmbito nacional ou internacional. CONCELHO EDITORIAL: Silvério Figueiredo; Fernando Coimbra; David Barão; Sofia Silvério; Fernanda Sousa; Ioanna Bachtsevanidou Strantzali; Marta Gomes. Depósito Legal: 189274/02 ISSN:1645-6297 Impressão: CWORLD (Pinhal Novo) Edição: Centro Português de Geo-História e Pré-História Periodicidade: anual Designe gráfico: Fernanda Sousa Sem autorização expressa do editor, não é permitida a reprodução parcial ou total dos artigos desta revista, desde que tal reprodução não decorra das finalidades específicas da divulgação e da crítica.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberian Crane Flyway News
    SIBERIAN CRANE FLYWAY NEWS Photo by S. Sadeghi Zadegan No 9 December 2007 COMPILED BY ELENA ILYASHENKO ICF/CMS SIBERIAN CRANE FLYWAY COORDINATOR 1 Content Information from Breeding and Summering Sites 2007 Eastern Flyway Breeding of Siberian and Sandhill Cranes at the Kytalyk Resource Reserve Yakutia, Russia, 2007 (Nikolai Ger- mogenov, Sergei Sleptsov, Maria Vladimirtseva, Inga Bysykatova) ............................................................... (4) Siberian Crane Records in Mongolia in 2007 (N. Tseveenmyadag) ................................................................ (4) Sightings of Siberian Cranes on the Daurian Steppe, Russia, in 2007 (Oleg Goroshko) ................................... (5) Information from Migration Sites 2007 Western and Central Flyways Sightings of the Siberian Crane in West Siberia, Russia, during Fall Migration 2007 (Anastasia Shilina) .............. (5) Sightings of Siberian Cranes in Uzbekistan ................................................................................................ (6) Siberian Crane Sighting in Samarkand Region, Uzbekistan (L. Belyalova, S. Fundukchiev)................................. (6) Siberian Crane Sightings in Kazakhstan during Migrations in 2007 (Yevgeni Bragin)......................................... (6) Sighting of the Siberian Crane in Astrakhan Nature Reserve, Russia, in the Fall of 2007 (German Rusanov) ........ (7) Eastern Flyway Spring Migration of the Siberian Crane in Northeast Yakutia, Russia, in 2007 (Igor Osipov) .............................. (7) Observations
    [Show full text]
  • Population Structure and Annual Migration Pattern of Steppe Eagles
    Population Structure and Annual Migration Pattern of Steppe Eagles at Thoolakharka Watch Site, Nepal, 2012–2014 Author(s): Tulsi Ram Subedi, Robert DeCandido, Hem Sagar Baral, Surya Gurung, Sandesh Gurung, Chong Leong Puan and Shahrul Anuar Mohd Sah Source: Journal of Raptor Research, 51(2):165-171. Published By: The Raptor Research Foundation https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-16-70.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3356/JRR-16-70.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/ page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. SHORT COMMUNICATIONS J. Raptor Res. 51(2):165–171 Ó 2017 The Raptor Research Foundation, Inc. POPULATION STRUCTURE AND ANNUAL MIGRATION PATTERN OF STEPPE EAGLES AT THOOLAKHARKA WATCH SITE, NEPAL, 2012–2014 1 TULSI RAM SUBEDI Centre for Marine and Coastal Studies (CEMACS), Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia and Nepalese Ornithological Union (NOU), P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Migration Studies
    Chapter 8 Migration Studies 100 Migration Studies Overview Theme he Pacific Flyway is a route taken by migratory birds during flights between breeding grounds in the north and wintering grounds in the south. Steigerwald Lake National Wildlife Refuge plays an important role in migration by providing birds with a protected resting area during their arduous journey. Migration makes it possible for birds to benefit the most from favorable weather conditions; they breed and feed in the north during the summer and rest and feed in the warmer south during the winter. This pattern is called return migration — the most common type of migration by birds. Through a variety of activities, students will learn about the factors and hazards of bird migration on the Pacific Flyway. Background The migration of birds usually refers to their regular flights between summer and winter homes. Some birds migrate thousands of miles, while others may travel less than a hundred miles. This seasonal movement has long been a mystery to humans. Aristotle, the naturalist and philosopher of ancient Greece, noticed that cranes, pelicans, geese, swans, doves, and many other birds moved to warmer places for the winter. Like others of times past, he proposed theories that were widely accepted for hundreds of years. One of his theories was that many birds spent the winter sleeping in hollow trees, caves, or beneath the mud in marshes. 101 Through natural selection, migration evolved as an advantageous behavior. Birds migrate north to nest and breed because the competition for food and space is substantially lower there. In addition, during the summer months the food supply is considerably better in many northern climates (e.g., Arctic regions).
    [Show full text]
  • Movements of Wild Ruddy Shelducks in the Central Asian Flyway and Their Spatial Relationship to Outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1
    Viruses 2013, 5, 2129-2152; doi:10.3390/v5092129 OPEN ACCESS viruses ISSN 1999-4915 www.mdpi.com/journal/viruses Article Movements of Wild Ruddy Shelducks in the Central Asian Flyway and Their Spatial Relationship to Outbreaks of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 John Y. Takekawa 1,*, Diann J. Prosser 2, Bridget M. Collins 2, David C. Douglas 3, William M. Perry 4, Baoping Yan 5, Luo Ze 5, Yuansheng Hou 6, Fumin Lei 7, Tianxian Li 8, Yongdong Li 8 and Scott H. Newman 9,† 1 San Francisco Bay Estuary Field Station, Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 505 Azuar Drive, Vallejo, CA 94592, USA 2 Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.J.P.); [email protected] (B.M.C.) 3 Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Juneau, AK 99801, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Dixon Field Station, Western Ecological Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 800 Business Park Drive, Suite D, Dixon, CA 95620, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 5 Computer Network Information Center (CNIC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (B.Y.); [email protected] (L.Z.) 6 Qinghai State Forestry Administration, Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve (QLNNR), Xining 25700, Qinghai, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 7 Institute of Zoology (IOZ), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; E-Mail: [email protected] 8 Institute of Virology (WIV), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (T.L.); [email protected] (Y.L.) 9 EMPRES Wildlife Health and Ecology Unit, Animal Health Service, Animal Production and Health Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome 00153, Italy; E-Mail: [email protected] † Current address: Emergency Center for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD)-Vietnam, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), No.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICY OPTIONS for MIGRATORY BIRD FLYWAYS CMS Flyways Working Group: Review 3
    CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES POLICY OPTIONS FOR MIGRATORY BIRD FLYWAYS CMS Flyways Working Group: Review 3 Colin A Galbraith March 2011 CMS Contract No 14550 and additional staff time from Colin Galbraith Environment Limited Policy Options for Migratory Bird Flyways CMS Flyways Working Group: Review 3 CONTENTS PAGE Executive summary 3 Introduction 14 1.1 Background and approach used 14 The major flyways 15 2.1 Flyways 15 2.2 The status of species on flyways 20 Coverage of existing CMS and non CMS instruments and frameworks 22 3.1 Summary of existing agreements 22 3.2 Gaps in geographical coverage 22 3.3 Coverage of species groups 23 3.4 Priorities to fill the gaps in coverage 24 The key pressures impacting on migratory birds 25 4.1 Habitat loss, fragmentation and reduction in quality 26 4.2 Climate change 28 4.3 By-catch 30 4.4 Unsustainable use 32 4.5 Lead shot and other poisons 35 4.6 Invasive alien species 36 4.7 Agricultural conflicts and pest control 37 4.8 Disease 38 4.9 Information gaps 39 2 Priorities for the development of CMS instruments to cover flyways 40 5.1 The role of CMS 40 5.2 Geographical priorities 41 5.3 Species priorities 46 Options for CMS instruments for migratory bird conservation 49 6.1 High level policy options 50 6.2 Developing a new approach 51 6.3 Identification of priorities and a plan for action 55 6.4 Mechanisms for action 59 6.5 Issues of profile 61 6.6 Practicalities 61 Annex 1 Timetable for major forthcoming meetings 64 Annex 2 Threatened waterbirds in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway 67 Annex 3
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Measures for the Siberian Crane
    CMS Technical Report Series No. 25 Conservation Measures for the Siberian Crane Prepared by the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals in collaboration with the International Crane Foundation Fifth Edition Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (UNEP/CMS). Recommended citation: Conservation Measures for the Siberian Crane, Fifth Edition. 2011. UNEP/CMS Sec- retariat, Bonn, Germany. 202 pages. Cover photograph © Zhou Haixiang Technical Report Series No 25 Prepared by: UNEP/CMS Secretariat in collaboration with the International Crane Foundation Editing by Elena Ilyashenko, Crawford Prentice, Claire Mirande, Elena Smirenski, Marco Barbieri, Christiane Röttger and Douglas Hykle © 2011 UNEP/CMS. This publication, except the cover photograph, may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational and other non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The UNEP/CMS Secretariat would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes whatsoever without prior permission from the United Nations Environmental Programme. DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessary reflect the views of UNEP/CMS or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP/CMS or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area in its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Flyway Databook 2020 MIGRATORY GAME BIRD HUNTING PERMITS by PROVINCE/TERRITORY of PURCHASE in CANADA
    CENTRAL FLYWAY HARVEST AND POPULATION SURVEY DATA BOOK 2020 compiled by: James A. Dubovsky CENTRAL FLYWAY REPRESENTATIVE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE DIVISION OF MIGRATORY BIRD MANAGEMENT 134 Union Blvd., Suite 540 Lakewood, CO 80228 (303) 275-2386 Suggested Citation: Dubovsky, J. A., compiler. 2020. Central Flyway harvest and population survey data book 2020. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood CO. CENTRAL FLYWAY 1948-2020 73 YEARS OF MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION Important Note to Users: From 1961-2001, estimates of waterfowl harvest, waterfowl hunter participation, and waterfowl hunter success in the United States were derived from a combination of several sources: 1) sales of migratory bird conservation stamps (Duck Stamps), 2) a Mail Questionnaire Survey of individuals who purchased ducks stamps for hunting purposes, and 3) the Waterfowl Parts Collection Survey (PCS). This survey, which was based on duck stamp sales was discontinued after the 2001 hunting season. Beginning in 1999, new survey methods were implemented that obtained estimates of waterfowl harvest, hunter participation, and hunter success from: 1) States' lists of migratory bird hunters identified through the Harvest Information Program (HIP), 2) a questionnaire (HIP Survey) sent to a sample of those hunters, and 3) the Waterfowl PCS. The basic difference is that during 1961 - 2001 waterfowl hunter activity and harvest estimates were derived from a Mail Questionnaire Survey (MQS) of duck stamp purchasers, whereas from 1999 to the present those estimates were derived from HIP surveys of people identified as migratory bird hunters by the States. Both survey systems relied on the Waterfowl PCS for species composition data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bird's EYE View on Flyways
    A BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON FLywayS A brief tour by the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals IMPRINT Published by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) A BIRD’S EYE VIEW ON FLywayS A brief tour by the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals UNEP / CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany. 68 pages. Produced by UNEP/CMS Text based on a report by Joost Brouwer in colaboration with Gerard Boere Coordinator Francisco Rilla, CMS Secretariat, E-mail: [email protected] Editing & Proof Reading Hanah Al-Samaraie, Robert Vagg Editing Assistant Stéphanie de Pury Publishing Manager Hanah Al-Samaraie, Email: [email protected] Design Karina Waedt © 2009 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) / Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP or contributory organizations.The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contrib- utory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area in its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Waterfowl Population Status Survey
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 August 19, 2019 In the United States the process of establishing hunting regulations for waterfowl is conducted annually. This process involves a number of scheduled meetings in which information regarding the status of waterfowl is presented to individuals within the agencies responsible for setting hunting regulations. In addition, the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register to allow public comment. This report includes the most current breeding population and production information available for waterfowl in North America and is a result of cooperative eforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS), various state and provincial conservation agencies, and private conservation organizations. In addition to providing current information on the status of populations, this report is intended to aid the development of waterfowl harvest regulations in the United States for the 2020–2021 hunting season. i Acknowledgments Waterfowl Population and Habitat Information: The information contained in this report is the result of the eforts of numerous individuals and organizations. Principal contributors include the Canadian Wildlife Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, state wildlife conservation agencies, provincial conservation agencies from Canada, and Direcci´on General de Conservaci´on Ecol´ogica de los Recursos Naturales, Mexico. In addition, several conservation organizations, other state and federal agencies, universities, and private individuals provided information or cooperated in survey activities. Appendix A.1 provides a list of individuals responsible for the collection and compilation of data for the “Status of Ducks” section of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Bridges for Migratory Waterbird Conservation in the Central Asian Flyway
    46 Indian Birds Vol. 1 No. 2 (March-April 2005) SATHIYASELVAM, P. 2004. Nidification and site middle of the woods. 44 (5): 79. February): Backcover. fidelity of the Black-crowned Night SINGH, Baljit. 2004. Comments on the cover THAKUR, Sanjay, and Aparna Watve. 2004. Heron, (Nycticorax nycticorax). 44 (4) photo. 44 (1) (January-February): Report of Lesser Kestrel (Falco (July-August): 63. Backcover. naumanni Fleischer) flock near SAXENA, Rajiv, and Gaurav Parihar. 2004. SINGHA, Hilloljyoti, Amarjit Narayan Dev, Thoseghar, Satara Dt. Maharashtra. 44 (4) Pesticides killing Demoiselle Cranes. 44 Rimpul Hazarika, Kaustoov Gopal (July-August): 60. (3) (May-June): 48. (With one b&w Goswami, and Banita Roy. 2004. Waterfowl TULJAPURKAR, Vijay. 2004. Birds in my photo.). census in Dheer Beel, Assam. 44 (3) garden. 44 (5): 75-78. SHARMA, Arunayan. 2004. Red-necked Grebe (May-June): 45. UTTANGI, J. C. 2004. Non-stop call of the (Podiceps griseigena) in West Bengal, a SIVAKUMAR, S., and Vibhu Prakash. 2004. Coppersmith, (Megalaima correction. 44 (1) (January-February): 15. Miscellaneous breeding information of haemacephala) observed lasting for —. 2004. Asian Koels are the first caller birds Collared Falconet Microhierax seven minutes in Dharwad urbans. 44 (2) of the day. 44 (2) (March-April): 29-30. caerulescens. 44 (4) (July-August): 57-58. (March-April): 29. (With two text-figs.). SRIDHAR, S. 2004. A note from the publisher: —. 2004. Robbing of eggs by female Koel, SHIVAPRAKASH, A. 2004. Nature trai in Anshi E. Hanumantha Rao no more. 44 (2) from the nest of Red-whiskered Bulbul forest area, North Kanara District, (March-April): 19.
    [Show full text]
  • CMS/CAF/Inf.4.13 1 Central Asian Flyway Action Plan for Waterbirds and Their Habitat Country Report
    CMS/CAF/Inf.4.13 Central Asian Flyway Action Plan for Waterbirds and their Habitat Country Report - INDIA A. Introduction India situated north of the equator covering an area of about 3,287,263 km2 is one of the largest country in the Asian region. With 10 distinctly different bio geographical zones and many different habitat types, the country is known amongst the top 12 mega biodiversity countries. India is known to support 1225 species of bird species, out of these 257 species are water birds. India remains in the core central region of the Central Asian Flyway (CAF) and holds some crucial important wintering population of water bird species. India is also a key breeding area for many other water birds such as Pygmy cormorant and Ruddy-shelduck, globally threatened water birds such as Dalmatian Pelican, Lesser White-fronted Goose, Siberian crane, oriental white stork, greater adjutant stork, white winged wood duck etc. Being located in the core of the CAF, and several important migration routes the country covers a large intra-continental territory between Arctic and Indian Ocean. Being aware of the importance of the wetlands within the geographic boundary of the India for migrating avifauna, India has developed a wetland conservation programme. India currently has 19 RAMSAR sites. India has identified more than 300 sites which has the potential to be consider as the RAMSAR sites. However, being the second most populus nation in the world with agricultural economy, wetlands are one of the most used habitat with water bird and human interface. Much of the Indian landmass also being dependent to the normal monsoonal rainfall for precipitation is also subjected to extremes of drought and flood making the wetlands vulnerable to drastic ecological changes.
    [Show full text]