DOCSLIB.ORG

A-A0774e.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A-A0774e.Pdf Cover graphic by Emanuela D’Antoni Layout by Nicholas Rubery Printed on ecological paper FAO/Fishcode Review No. 19 FI/FCR19 Spearfishing in the Pacific Islands Current status and management issues by Robert Gillett and Wayne Moy Global Partnerships for Responsible Fisheries (FishCode) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2006 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material in this information product for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission should be addressed to the Chief, Electronic Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Information Division, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy or by e-mail to [email protected] © FAO 2006 Foreword This report was prepared by Robert Gillett and Wayne Moy, on the initiative of the Secretariat of the Pacific Commission (SPC) and with the support of the FAO FishCode Programme, under Project GCP/INT/823/JPN, “Responsible Fisheries for Small Island Developing States”. The document presents the findings of the SPC/FAO-FishCode Pacific Islands Spearfishing Study, including a review of spearfishing in selected countries, the major problems related to spearfishing and possible interventions to mitigate such problems in the Pacific Islands countries. The FishCode Review series publishes results of studies, missions, consultations, workshops, meetings and other project activities undertaken through the Programme, in furtherance of the objective of facilitating implementation of the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and related international fisheries instruments and plans of action. Individual issues in the series are distributed to appropriate governments, regional bodies, meeting participants and Programme partners. For further information on Programme background, publications and activities, please consult the Web site at http://www.fao.org/fi/fishcode.htm J. Eric Reynolds Programme Coordinator, FishCode FAO Fisheries Department Rome, Italy FAO/FishCode Review, No. 19 Distribution: SPC FI Divisions and Services FI Branch Library Other interested agencies iii Gillett, R.; Moy, W. Spearfishing in the Pacific Islands. Current status and management issues. FAO/FishCode Review. No. 19. Rome, FAO. 2006.72p. ABSTRACT Spearfishing is growing in importance in the Pacific Islands. While its management has featured as a topic in some regional-level meetings, detailed information on spearfishing is surprisingly scarce. In early 1994, the Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) proposed to consolidate information on spearfishing in the Pacific Islands. The original intent was to undertake a review of the available literature through a desk study. With the realization that many issues related to spearfishing are undocumented, the strategy was changed to include some field work. These activities were supported by the FAO FishCode Programme. This report reviews spearfishing in selected Pacific Island countries and identifies the important species caught by and the major problems associated with the method. It further considers possible interventions to mitigate these problems and the assistance that is likely to be required by Pacific Island countries in the management of their spearfisheries. Visits to five countries undertaken during the study show that there are very large differences between countries, and between locations within a single country, in the level and type of spearfishing activities. General conclusions on the management of spearfishing include: (a) for several reasons, a complete ban of scuba spearfishing coupled with effective enforcement is the single most important spearfishing management measure; (b) spearfishing effort must be managed along with other forms of inshore fishing, since attempts at restricting spearfishing alone are not likely to be successful as fishing effort may be easily transferred to other small-scale fishing methods; and (c) in the management of inshore fisheries, including that of spearfishing, interventions must be formulated, initiated and enforced at the local level, preferably with some assistance from the national level. Keywords: coastal fisheries; marine fisheries; small-scale fisheries; traditional rights; small island developing States; South Pacific, illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. iv Contents Abbreviations and acronyms ..................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... viii 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The spearfishing study .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Some methodology considerations ............................................................................................... 2 2. Information on spearfishing from country visits ........................................................................... 3 2.1 Information on spearfishing in Fiji.................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Information on spearfishing in Tonga .......................................................................................... 14 2.3 Information on spearfishing in Samoa......................................................................................... 21 2.4 Information on spearfishing in Tuvalu ......................................................................................... 28 2.5 Information on spearfishing in the Solomon Islands ................................................................... 34 2.6 Summary of observations in Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Tuvalu and the Solomon Islands................... 38 3. Information from other Pacific Island countries .......................................................................... 40 3.1 Aspects of management of spearfishing in American Samoa .................................................... 40 3.2 Aspects of management of spearfishing on Satawal Island, FSM.............................................. 42 4. PROCFish-C results ........................................................................................................................ 42 5. Industrial spearfishing.................................................................................................................... 44 6. Information from other regions...................................................................................................... 45 7. The spearfishing catch and associated issues............................................................................ 46 7.1 Important species ........................................................................................................................ 46 7.2 Thoughts on spearfishing selectivity ........................................................................................... 49 7.3 The Selectivity of spearfishing as compared to gillnetting .......................................................... 50 7.4 Sources of fishing mortality for the main species........................................................................ 51 7.5 The catch of low trophic level herbivorous fishes by spearfishing .............................................. 52 8. Management of spearfishing.......................................................................................................... 53 8.1 Major difficulties and issues in spearfishing ................................................................................ 53 8.2 Spearfishing contributing to inshore overfishing ......................................................................... 56 8.3 Scuba spearfishing ...................................................................................................................... 57 8.4 What works?................................................................................................................................ 58 8.5 Additional comments on spearfishing management ................................................................... 59 9. FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries issues relevant to spearfishing ................. 60 v 10. The value of launching a special regional initiative on managing spearfisheries ................. 61 11. Concluding remarks...................................................................................................................... 62 12. References ....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chuuk Visitors Bureau P.O BOX 1142 WENO, CHUUK FSM 96942 TEL: (691) 330-4133/330-4480 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: H 21
    Welcome to CHUUK A Guide to the Historic Wrecks Courtesy Chuuk and Visitors Bureau Island Attractions - Best Wrecks - Island Maps - Activities - History Welcome he many islands within this huge atoll are crowned with Tnatural beauty. The outer barrier reef is punctuated with idyllic sandspits dotted with coconut palms. The high islands in the central lagoon rise into the blue Micronesian skies. The word “Chuuk” means “high mountains” in the Chuukese language. Chuuk State, which is one of four states in the Federated States of Micronesia, consists of 290 islands with 250 islands uninhabited. The islands have natural beauty and most still display a traditional lifestyle. The main population area is within the vast Chuuk Lagoon (sometimes called Truk Lagoon) where the vestiges of WWII attract divers from around the world. The huge inner lagoon is famously known for the “World’s Greatest Wreck Diving.” The islands were heavily attacked by the US in the Second World War then bypassed and blockaded by the Allies. The sunken hulls of Japanese ships remain along with ruined weapons and fortifications on land. Many divers feel it has the best collection of shipwrecks and WWII era airplanes in the world. The hulks have been transformed into amazing “shipreefs”, holding the very best of the undersea world and maritime history at one site. Incredible corals in a kaleidoscope of colors and shapes fed by warm, clear waters attract divers worldwide. The reefs also are home to a great variety of fish and corals. Visitors can see the islands and there are many “picnic islands” that are great for day trips and relaxing.
    [Show full text]
  • Static Fishing Around Fish Aggregating Devices (Fads) and Offshore Banks
    SPC Fisheries Newsletter # 42 Page 27 STATIC FISHING AROUND FISH AGGREGATING DEVICES (FADS) AMD OFFSHORE BANKS IN AMERICAN SAMOA by Michael Crook Leilani Enterprises, Inc Pago Pago, American Samoa This work was carried out as part of Pacific Fisheries Development Foundation Project No 44a. Experimental static handline fishing around FADs was first attempted in American Samoa in 1978-9 by Pat Brian who was associated with the first generation of FADs to be deployed here. No formal reports or records were made describing the gear, techniques or catch, but word-of-mouth reports indicate that this work was mildly successful. The most recent generation of FADs was deployed in late 1984 following a period of over a year where there were no buoys at all. During this period trolling had become nearly unprofitable due to rising fuel costs and the increasing scarcity of fish, often attributed to the influx of tuna superseiners to this area. Now the buoys have brought the fish but trolling can stiil be uneconomical when the fish are either not feeding on the surface or not biting on artificial lures, which is often the case in very calm weather or during mid-day hours. The purpose of this programme was to investigate the feasibility of static fishing for the pelagic species usually caught by trolling around FADs and offshore banks e.g. yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares), bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus), skipjack {Katsuwonus pelamis), wahoo (Acanthocybium solandn) and dolphin fish (Coryphaena hippurus). (P SWAINS a lORl^C VOLOSEGA 'E' FAD n 3 miles TA U /-'^Paao sJ AUNU'U V C~?ago| ^o BANK \ , \_^J 20 miles \ / 5 miles" ^ FAD y TUTUILA w^-> ( 3 miles [ 'c' 0 FAD 35 miles 40 miles "SOUTHEAST " SOUTH BANK Figure 1: Tutuila Island, American Samoa, showing FAD position and areas fished PSger?28! SPCi FisherJesrvWews letters #42; Mettibds (arM ;:inaterialsn Oi'NTASSflSDA n&''~\ mtU^/i Slli'^m-i orh"-t The sixteen trips made between December 1984 and April 1985 were aboard the 40 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Techniques Used Around Fish Aggregation Devices in French Polynesia
    SPC/Fisheries 22/WP.14 27 July 1990 ORIGINAL : FRENCH SOUTH PACIFIC COMMISSION TWENTY-SECOND REGIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING ON FISHERIES (Noumea, New Caledonia 6-10 August, 1990) FISHING TECHNIQUES USED AROUND FISH AGGREGATION DEVICES IN FRENCH POLYNESIA by F. Leproux, G. Moarii, S. Yen EVAAM, B.P. 20, Papeete, Tahiti, French Polynesia 643/90 SPC/Fisheries 22/WP.14 Page 1 FISHING TECHNIQUES USED AROUND FISH AGGREGATION DEVICES IN FRENCH POLYNESIA Mooring FADs in French Polynesian waters, which began in June 1981, has had a favourable impact on local fishermen who, although they were sceptical to begin with, have come to use this assistance increasingly, many of them finding it very helpful. The techniques of fishing around FADs have changed over the years and in 1990 four are still currently in use, while new techniques are constantly being developed and taught in order to obtain better yields. 1. FISHING TECHNIQUES 1.1 Handline fishing Many small boats (3 to 6m) do deep fishing near FADs when a school of tuna is present. The handline is made of nylon line of 130 kg and a tuna hook (cf Diagram no. 1, Plate no. 1). The bait used varies with the season: thus "operu" (Decapterus macarellus), "ature" (Selar crumennhialmus), "numa" (Mulloidichihys samoensis), "marara" (Cysselurus simus), and skipjack fillet (Katsuwonus pelamis) are the most commonly used. The technique consists in placing this bait low down in the school. In order to facilitate the drop of the line, a stone is fixed to it temporarily. When the fisherman considers that he has reached the required depth, he gives the line a sharp jerk upwards which releases the stone and also some crumbs which awake the tunas' appetite.
    [Show full text]
  • Adventures in Diving and Correlating Specialty Diver Programmes Statement of Risks and Liability
    ADVENTURES IN DIVING AND CORRELATING SPECIALTY DIVER PROGRAMMES STATEMENT OF RISKS AND LIABILITY (PADI International Ltd) Please read carefully and fill in all blanks before signing. This is a statement in which you are informed of the risks of skin and scuba diving. The statement also sets out the circumstances in which you participate in the diving programme at your own risk. Your signature on this statement is required as proof that you have received and read this statement. It is important that you read the contents of this statement before signing it. If you do not understand anything contained in this statement, then please discuss it with your instructor. If you are a minor, this form must also be signed by a parent or guardian. This Statement of Risks and Liability hereby encompasses and applies to all diving activities in which you choose to participate as part of the PADI Adventures in Diving programme. These specialised diving activities and instruction may include, but are not limited to, Navigation, Night, Deep, Altitude, Boat, Drift, Diver Propulsion Vehicle, Dry Suit, Wreck, Fish Identification, Multilevel, Peak Performance Buoyancy, Search and Recovery, Underwater Naturalist, Underwater Photography and Underwater Videography. This Statement also encompasses and applies to select PADI specialty diver courses in which you choose to participate that are introduced as a part of the PADI Adventures in Diving programme. These specialty diver courses may include, but are not limited to, Navigation, Night, Deep, Altitude, Boat, Diver Propulsion Vehicle, Drift, Dry Suit, Wreck, Fish Identification, Multilevel, Peak Performance Buoyancy, Search and Recovery, Underwater Naturalist, Underwater Photography and Underwater Videography.
    [Show full text]
  • Seafood Trade Relief Program Frequently Asked Questions Last Updated: September 18, 2020
    Seafood Trade Relief Program Frequently Asked Questions Last Updated: September 18, 2020 Eligibility Q: Who is eligible to participate in the Seafood Trade Relief Program (STRP)? A: U.S. commercial fishermen who have a valid federal or state license or permit to catch seafood who bring their catch to shore and sell or transfer them to another party. That other party must be a legally permitted or licensed seafood dealer. Alternatively, the catch can be processed at sea and sold by the same legally permitted entity that harvested or processed the product. Q: I don’t participate in any USDA programs. Can I apply for STRP? A: Yes. Prior participation in USDA programs is not a prerequisite. Q: Is there an Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) limit to participate in STRP? A: Yes. To participate, a person or legal entity’s AGI cannot exceed $900,000 (using the average for the 2016, 2017, and 2018 tax years). However, the AGI limit does not apply if 75 percent or more of an eligible person’s or legal entity’s AGI comes from seafood production, farming, ranching, forestry, or related activities. Q: As a tribal fisherman, the treaty does not require me to submit annual income tax returns for fishing. Will this affect my ability to apply to STRP? A: No, that does not affect the application process. Tribal fishermen should submit their applications to FSA. Guidance on documentation by tribal members to certify compliance of meeting the adjusted gross income limit of $900K is forthcoming. Eligible Seafood Q: What seafood is eligible? A: Eligible seafood species must have been subject to retaliatory tariffs and suffered more than $5 million in retaliatory trade damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Scale Fishing
    Panelist: Fábio H. V. Hazin, D.Sc. UFRPE/ DEPAq Director UFRPE- Universidade Federal DEPAq- Departamento de Rural de Pernambuco [email protected] Aqüicultura e Pesca TheThe SixthSixth MeetingMeeting ofof thethe UnitedUnited NationsNations OpenOpen--endedended InformalInformal ConsultativeConsultative ProcessProcess onon OceansOceans andand thethe LawLaw ofof thethe SeaSea FISHERIESFISHERIES ANDAND THEIRTHEIR CONTRIBUTIONCONTRIBUTION TOTO SUSTAINABLESUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT:DEVELOPMENT: SMALLSMALL--SCALESCALE ANDAND ARTISANALARTISANAL FISHERIESFISHERIES ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED: (Format and annotated provisional agenda: Annex III.A) 1- What actions can be undertaken to improve (understanding of) the contribution of small-scale fisheries to food security and poverty reduction? 2- How can vulnerability in small-scale fishing countries be reduced and the added value of small-scale fishing activities be increased? Definition of artisanal and small-scale fishing: The term “artisanal” refers to the relative level of technology, while “small-scale” refers to the size of the fishing unity (scale) According to FAO’s Glossary: Artisanal, or small-scale fisheries, are traditional fisheries involving fishing households (as opposed to commercial companies), using relatively small amount of capital and energy, relatively small fishing vessels (if any), making short fishing trips, close to shore, and mainly for local consumption. They can be for subsistence or commercial. The Sixth Meeting of the United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Huron Scuba Diving
    SOUTHERN LAKE ASSESSMENT SOUTHERN RECREATION PROFILE LAKE Scuba Diving: OPPORTUNITIES FOR LAKE HURON ASSESSMENT FINGER LAKES SCUBA LAKES FINGER The southern Lake Huron coast is a fantastic setting for outdoor exploration. Promoting the region’s natural assets can help build vibrant communities and support local economies. This series of fact sheets profiles different outdoor recreation activities that could appeal to residents and visitors of Michigan’s Thumb. We hope this information will help guide regional planning, business develop- ment and marketing efforts throughout the region. Here we focus on scuba diving – providing details on what is involved in the sport, who participates, and what is unique about diving in Lake Huron. WHY DIVE IN LAKE HURON? With wildlife, shipwrecks, clear water and nearshore dives, the waters of southern Lake Huron create a unique environment for scuba divers. Underwater life abounds, including colorful sunfish and unusual species like the longnose gar. The area offers a large collection of shipwrecks, and is home to two of Michigan’s 12 underwater preserves. Many of the wrecks are in close proximity to each other and are easily accessed by charter or private boat. The fresh water of Lake Huron helps to preserve the wrecks better than saltwater, and the lake’s clear water offers excellent visibility – often up to 50 feet! With many shipwrecks at different depths, the area offers dives for recreational as well as technical divers. How Popular is Scuba Diving? Who Scuba Dives? n Scuba diving in New York’s Great Lakes region stimulated more than $108 In 2010, 2.7 million Americans went scuba A snapshot of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyramid Lake Northern Paiute Fishing: the Ethnographic Record
    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 176-186 (1981). Pyramid Lake Northern Paiute Fishing: The Ethnographic Record CATHERINE S. FOWLER JOYCE E. BATH HE importance of fishing to the ethno­ 1930's as part of his general ethnographic Tgraphic subsistence regimes of lake- investigations of the Nevada Northern Paiute. and river-based Northern Paiute groups has Park also made material culture collections been suggested by several writers but not fully that included fishing gear for the Peabody documented. For example, in the context of Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology and the Culture Element Distribution surveys, for the American Museum of Natural History. Stewart (1941:370-371) affirms that fish These objects, as well as others from collec­ were taken by most groups using specialized tions made in 1875 by Stephen Powers and in gear such as nets, baskets, weirs, platforms, 1916 by Samuel Barrett, were recently harpoons, and gorge and composite hooks. studied and photographed as part of a project Curtis (1926:71) notes the use of dip nets, gill to make Park's data more readily available.' nets, bident spears, gorges, and weirs. And Taken together, these materials significantly Wheat (1967) describes in detail the manufac­ expand our knowledge of Northern Paiute ture and use of the single-barbed harpoon. fishing techniques, and by implication, sug­ However, only Speth (1969) has attempted to gest that fishing and other lacustrine, riverine, place Northern Paiute fishing in its broader and marsh-oriented subsistence pursuits were social and technological contexts, and her vitally important in the economic systems of paper is concerned exclusively with fishing at several Northern Paiute groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Twin Lakes Reservoirs
    Twin Lakes Reservoirs FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Michael Atwood - Aquatic Biologist (Salida) [email protected] / 719-530-5525 General Information: Twin Lakes Reservoirs have a combined surface area of 2700 acres. They offer good fishing for brown, rainbow, and cutthroat trout with trophy lake trout potential. The reservoir has ex- cellent amenities and is nestled at the base of Mt. Elbert and the Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Area. To view map go to http://maps.google.com/maps Location: Chaffee County. Located at the mouth of Lake Creek northwest of Granite, Colorado. Recreational Management: Colorado Parks and Wildlife (719-530-5520) and USFS (719-486-0749). Fishery Management: Coldwater angling for brown, rainbow, cutthroat and lake trout. Detailed Fishery Information: See additional pages. Amenities and General Info. Previous Stocking Sportfishing Notes Boat Ramps (2) 2019 Rainbow/Cutthroat Trout Picnic Areas (1) Campgrounds (3) Rainbow Trout Trout action has picked up in Restrooms at most sites Brown Trout recent years. They average Trail around most of lake 13 inches with fish up to 20 Abundant fishing access 2018 inches taken. Catchables (10+ inch) are stocked from Regulations Rainbow Trout June through September. Cutbow Trout The bag and possession Lake Trout limit for lake trout is 1. 2017 Lake trout 22-34 inches Lake trout average 19 inches long must be returned to the Rainbow Trout with fish in the 40 inch class water immediately. Cutbow Trout becoming more abundant. Statewide bag and posses- Lake Trout Some of the best action can sion limits apply for other 2016 be found casting large Ra- species (see CPW Fishery pallas at ice-out near the hy- Brochure).
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Fishing Tips by Capt
    101 Fishing Tips By Capt. Lawrence Piper www.TheAnglersMark.com [email protected] 904-557 -1027 Table of Contents Tackle and Angling Page 2 Fish and Fishing Page 5 Fishing Spots Page 13 Trailering and Boating Page 14 General Page 15 1 Amelia Island Back Country Light Tackle Fishing Tips Tackle and Angling 1) I tell my guests who want to learn to fish the back waters “learn your knots”! You don’t have to know a whole bunch but be confident in the ones you’re going to use and know how to tie them good and fast so you can bet back to fishing after you’ve broken off. 2) When fishing with soft plastics keep a tube of Super Glue handy in your tackle box. When you rig the grub on to your jig, place a drop of the glue below the head and then finish pushing the grub up. This will secure the grub better to the jig and help make it last longer. 3) Many anglers get excited when they hook up with big fish. When fishing light tackle, check your drag so that it’s not too tight and the line can pull out. When you hookup, the key is to just keep the pressure on the fish. If you feel any slack, REEL! When the fish is pulling away from you, use the rod and the rod tip action to tire the fish. Slowly work the fish in, lifting up, reeling down. Keep that pressure on! 4) Net a caught fish headfirst. Get the net down in the water and have the angler work the fish towards you and as it tires, bring the fish headfirst into the net.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Basics – Seafood Markets Where Are Fish Sold?
    Fishery Basics – Seafood Markets Where Are Fish Sold? Fisheries not only provide a vital source of food to the global population, but also contribute between $225-240 billion annually to the worldwide economy. Much of this economic stimulus comes from the sale and trade of fishery products. The sale of fishery products has evolved from being restricted to seaside towns into a worldwide market where buyers can choose from fish caught all over the globe. Like many other commodities, fisheries markets are fluctuating constantly. In recent decades, seafood imports into the United States have increased due to growing demands for cheap seafood products. This has increased the amount of fish supplied by foreign countries, expanded efforts in aquaculture, and increased the pursuit of previously untapped resources. In 2008, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) reported (pdf) that the U.S. imported close to 2.4 million t (5.3 billion lbs) of edible fishery products valued at $14.2 billion dollars. Finfish in all forms (fresh, frozen, and processed) accounted for 48% of the imports and shellfish accounted for an additional 36% of the imports. Overall, shrimp were the highest single-species import, accounting for 24% of the total fishery products imported into the United States. Tuna and Salmon were the highest imported finfish accounting for 18% and 10% of the total imports respectively. The majority of fishery products imported came from China, Thailand, Canada, Indonesia, Vietnam, Ecuador, and Chile. The U.S. exported close to 1.2 million t (2.6 billion lbs) valued at $3.99 billion in 2008.
    [Show full text]