DOCSLIB.ORG

Manny Klausner Charles Koch Dave Nolan Bob Poole Di

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Reminiscences 10 Key Libertarian Activists Discuss the Significance of the Movement They Helped Build. The setting: the elegant Sheraton-PalaceHotel in San Fmn- Americansfir Freedom at the historic 1969 YAF convention. cisco. The occasion: the annual convention of the national He is currently a professor of economics. Libertarian Party. Gatheredfor the occasion were close to MARK FMzIER-long-time REASON contributing editor IO00 people, including many of the key activists who had led and libertarianjournalist, Frazier currently directs the Sabre thegrowth of the libertarian movement over the past decade. Foundation's Journalism Fund and its Space Freeport Several months before, it had occurred to Dave Nolan what Project, and serves as executive director of the Local Govern- a unique opportunity this convention wouldpresent. Why not ment Center. bring together these key people, in one room (some of them MANUEL KLAUSNER-REASON partner and ediwr, one- meetingfor thefirst time), to discuss the accomplishments of timeLP candidatefir Congress, talk-showparticipant, world the libertarian movement, their own des in shaping it, and traveler, and practicing attorney with one of Los Angeles' their views on itsfiture course and prospects? REASON editor biggest law jTrms. Bob Poole agreed, and began sending out letters. CHARLES Koca-chairman of Koch Industries and presi- Consequently, at the close of a long day of seminars, dent of the Fred C. Koch Foundation, Koch plays a key role in debates, meals, speeches, and socializing, 10 libertarian a number of libertarian institutions. He is chairman of the leaders sat down around a tape recorder to reminisce and Institute for Humane Studes, director of the Cat0 Institute, prognosticate. The participants: and a member of the Mont Pelerin Society. ROY CHILDS-editor of Libertarian Review, formerly a key DAVE NoLm-founder of the Libertarian Party, its first staff member of the Society fir Individual Liberty and of its national chairman, and a guidingforce on its executive com- magazine, Individualist. Childs' "Open Letter to Ayn Rand" mittee for itsfirstfive years. Nolan's activism dates back to in I969 ignited the anarchist/limited government contro- the early196O's, including YAF, Youthfor Goldwater, Young versy. Republicans, and the Liberiy Amendment Committee. JOE corn-presently REASON'S Frontlines columnist and ROBERT POOLE-REASON editor and partner, Poole dates active in the Illinois Libertarian Party, Cobb was editorin- his activism to 1964 when he and Nolan were classmates at chief of New Individualist Review, a classical liberal journal MIT.Currently a columnistfor the National Taxpayers Union of the 1960's and precursor of today's libertarian magazines. and 150 newspapers, Poole also serves as president of the ED cram-president of the Cat0 Institute and of Liber- Local Government Center. tarian Review, Inc., and publisher of Inquiry, Crane spent DAVE WALmR-with Ernsberger,founded the Society for three years as national chairman of the Libertarian Party Individual Liberty in Philadephia in 1969, merging the during which it grew to become America's third largest party. YAF-Spinoff Libertarian Caucus with Jaret Wollstein's In the LP's5rst year Crane served as REASON'S LP Cor- Society for Rational Individualism. Walter and Ernsberger respondent. are now SIL $ co-directors. Walter teaches high school history DON ERNSBERGER-CO-foUnder of the society for and government. Individual Liberty, the largest libertarian campus-oriented With JO such people all in one place, the talk went on group. Emsberger led the Libertarian Caucus out of Young and on, punctuated by good-natured ribbing and ideological 44 REASONIMAY 1978 Clockwise from left: Don Ernsberger, Dave Nolan, Bob Poole, Roy Childs, Mark Frazier, Dave Walter, Joe Cobb, Ed Crane, and Manny Klausner confrontations. The initial tmnsckpt ran to near& 25,000 ture, is Austrian economics. Because from a political stand- words-practically enoughfor a book. Somehow, copy editor point, the phrenology that is being put forth by the Keynes- Marty Zupan was able to cut and prune, through several ians and the Friedmanites is an excuse for the politicians to slimmed-down drafrs, to am’ve at the 7000 words presented control our lives. Most of the legislation coming from Wash- here. ington is based on economics, and on misguided economic theory. And if we get Austrian economics to grow to a suf- DAVENOLAN: This is a panel discussion on the libertarian ficient degree, then it is going to be harder and harder for the movement and its prospects, by some of the people who have politicians in Washington to justify what they’re doing. been making it possible. The first question is, Where do you ROY CHILDS: I’d say that the Libertarian Party, partic- see the “movement” as being today? ularlysince 1975, is the only institution in the movement with DAVE WALTER: I see it essentially still building from its a clear-cut sense of direction and purpose. The movement in base. 1 know there’ve been figures bandied about of its general is in a state of intellectual disarray, with the exception doubling every two years, but we’re still small enough that of a small number of people at the top. I attribute this to the we’re talking about building the intellectual base of the youth of most libertarians and the fact that they have been movement. astonishingly bad at what I call intellectual entrepreneur- ED CRANE: Well, I think the party and the movement are ship-that is, the spotting and defining of issues and knowing poised to accelerate their growth. Almost everybody here got the appropriate ways to capitalize on them and promote started from the right wing, but that’s changing dramatically. them. Most people coming into the movement now are coming from DON ERNSBERGER: Well, I think, realistically, the liber- the left, particularly young people. tarian movement today is extremely, extremely small in its NOLAN: Which I think is very good, because it’s giving a effect and in its development. The main satisfaction that I see needed balance. is not in the area of politics, but in what Ed Crane said, and CRANE: Well, it’s not just balance. The right wing is that is primarily in the fact that when you look at the graduate atrophying for good reason, and if libertarianism is going to schools, you see large numbers of people coming out with succeed as a political movement in this country-and it is a Austrian backgrounds in economics, coming out with liber- political philosophy despite the fact that many people don’t tarian credentials, becoming teachers and professionals. I want to admit that-we’re going to have to attract support have never felt that politics at this point in history is going to from the left. And I see the movement developing a certain have much of an effect on where we’re going. professionalism now and starting to make inroads in the left NOLAN: I’d like to offer a counter to that. I see us as being at with people like Earl Ravenal and John Marks speaking at the stage where we are in the very earliest days of what you the Libertarian Party Convention this year. I view that left- might call “going public.” We’ve spent anywhere from 10 to ward drift of the movement as very helpful. Maybe “leftward 30 years, depending on where you mark the beginning, devel- drift” is the wrong phrase to use but. oping theory and educating people in libertarian theory and The other thing that I think is very important, and which I expanding our ranks. And we are now, I believe, at the point really view as the cutting edge of the movement at this junc- where we do have a large enough number of people, where we ~~ MAY 1978lREASON 45 Roy Childs Joe Cobb Ed Crane Don Ernsberger Mark Frazic are just about to explode onto the public consciousness and recognize that fact. make tremendous strides at picking up support from left, NOLAN: Atlas b beginning to shrug. right, and center-from people who see that the Leviathan CHILDS: In Western Europe, socialism is crumbling; com- State is eroding their liberties, restricting their options, and munism’s successes have been set back in many parts of the generally making their lives considerably less wonderful than world; intervention domestically and in foreign policy has not they otherwise could be. We’ve done our homework. Now we worked, and miny people are beginning to rebel against have to put it into practice. control of their own life styles. And these are facts of reality CRANE: I just want to interject something quickly so it which we are recognizing and using, and they’re very doesn’t appear I’m agreeing with Don. A lot of the growth on important. campus I view as clearly a function of the growth of the Liber- NOLAN: Before we plunge forward, I’ll just review some of the historical trivia that I realized for the first time about a month ago. I had not realized until Watergate was high- lighted in the newspapers that by sheer and pure coincid- ence-I assumethe founding convention of the Libertarian Party occurred the same weekend as the Watergate break-in. CRANE: Is that right? MANNY KLAUSNER: I’ll drink to that. WALTER That’s incredible. BOBPOOLE: I want to add a footnote about the movement. There’s an aspect that I think is very important now, that didn’t exist five years ago. Five years ago, the movement was Dave Nolan Roy Childs mostly students and people who had recently been students who were gung-ho, enthusiastic, and in touch with each other tarian Party, and it boggles my mind that people who are through organizations like the early LP or through SIL.
Recommended publications
  • Money Talks a Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21St Century Plutocrats

    Money Talks a Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21St Century Plutocrats

    Graduate School Master of Science in Global Studies Major: Political Science Course: SIMV07 Term: Spring 2017 Supervisor: Alexander von Hagen-Jamar Money Talks A Realist Constructivist Account of the Motives of 21st Century Plutocrats Author: Pauliina Parviainen Abstract Plutocracy is a subject that has not traditionally attracted the interest of scholars in the disciplines of International Relations and Political Science. This is unfortunate, as the number and importance of affluent private individuals in global affairs has steadily increased in recent decades. Since most existing academic research on contemporary plutocrats focuses on philanthropists and other ‘benefactors’, this research examines what drives the behaviour of the so-called ‘malefactors’ – in this case, enormously wealthy citizens from the Persian Gulf who fund Islamist extremism and the Koch brothers who fight against climate change mitigation efforts and U.S. government regulations. The research is guided by a realist constructivist hypothesis according to which plutocrats use their material assets to advance ideological causes that in the long run further increase their economic wealth. Qualitative content analysis was performed on select texts that dealt with these actors’ presumable and stated motives. The analysis of the Koch brothers suggested that the logic behind their political adventures closely followed this hypothesis. However, the case of Gulf plutocrats only partially confirmed the hypothesis, as ideological and identity-related reasons prevailed over material considerations in these actors’ motives. Keywords: First Image, Koch, Plutocrat, Realist Constructivism, Terrorism Financing Words: 19 952 Contents: 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Research problem and research question 2 1.2 Structure of the thesis 4 2.
  • Conservative Movement

    Conservative Movement

    Conservative Movement How did the conservative movement, routed in Barry Goldwater's catastrophic defeat to Lyndon Johnson in the 1964 presidential campaign, return to elect its champion Ronald Reagan just 16 years later? What at first looks like the political comeback of the century becomes, on closer examination, the product of a particular political moment that united an unstable coalition. In the liberal press, conservatives are often portrayed as a monolithic Right Wing. Close up, conservatives are as varied as their counterparts on the Left. Indeed, the circumstances of the late 1980s -- the demise of the Soviet Union, Reagan's legacy, the George H. W. Bush administration -- frayed the coalition of traditional conservatives, libertarian advocates of laissez-faire economics, and Cold War anti- communists first knitted together in the 1950s by William F. Buckley Jr. and the staff of the National Review. The Reagan coalition added to the conservative mix two rather incongruous groups: the religious right, primarily provincial white Protestant fundamentalists and evangelicals from the Sunbelt (defecting from the Democrats since the George Wallace's 1968 presidential campaign); and the neoconservatives, centered in New York and led predominantly by cosmopolitan, secular Jewish intellectuals. Goldwater's campaign in 1964 brought conservatives together for their first national electoral effort since Taft lost the Republican nomination to Eisenhower in 1952. Conservatives shared a distaste for Eisenhower's "modern Republicanism" that largely accepted the welfare state developed by Roosevelt's New Deal and Truman's Fair Deal. Undeterred by Goldwater's defeat, conservative activists regrouped and began developing institutions for the long haul.
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism

    Nine Lives of Neoliberalism

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
  • THE LIBERTARIAN REVIEW January 1979 $1.25 There Are Half a Million Men and Women in ~~ Prisons Around the World for the Simple Crime of

    THE LIBERTARIAN REVIEW January 1979 $1.25 There Are Half a Million Men and Women in ~~ Prisons Around the World for the Simple Crime of

    THE LIBERTARIAN REVIEW January 1979 $1.25 There are half a million men and women in ~~ prisons around the world for the simple crime of ....... disagreeing with their governments. From South Africa to the Soviet Union, canIieIp&ee........ from Brazil to Korea, authoritarian regimes persist ~ in the barbarian practice of jailing, often torturing, ofconsc:lence·aU their citizens not for anything they've done, but for what they believe. Ihe..-W. These prisoners of conscience have only one hope - that someone outside will care about what is happening to them. Amnesty International has helped free over 14,000 political prisoners by marshaling world public.opinion through international letter-writing campaIgns. Your pen can become a {Jower:ful weapon against repression, injustice and Inhumanity. Join with us today in this important effort. Because if we do not help today's victims, who will help us if we become tomorrow's? Amnesty International 3618 Sacramento San Francisco, 94118 (415) 563-3733 2112 Broadway New Yo'rk, N. Y. 10023 (212) 787-8906 o I would like to join A mnesty International in helping to free prisoners ofconscience. Enclosed are my dues offifteen dollars. o Please send me more information. o Enclosed is my contribution of$ _ to help you in your efforts. name Prepared by Public Media Center. San Francrsco. address city state .zip (Dues and donationS are tax-deductible) TDE LIBERTARIAN FEATURES REVIEW China: The Annihilation of Hutnan Rights 26 JanuarII979 by David Hart Volume ~ No. 12 "Why has it taken so long to expose the gross violations of human rights-the massacres, torture and imprisonment-that have occured since the Communist Chinese Party came to power in 1949?" Playing the Mont Pelerin 1947-1978: China Card The Road to LibertarianisIn 16 by Leonard E Liggio by Roy A.
  • Ralph Raico: Champion of Authentic Liberalism Daniel P

    Ralph Raico: Champion of Authentic Liberalism Daniel P

    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State History Theses History and Social Studies Education 12-2012 Ralph Raico: Champion of Authentic Liberalism Daniel P. Stanford [email protected] Advisor Gary Marotta, Ph.D., Professor of History First Reader Gary Marotta, Ph.D., Professor of History Second Reader John D. Abromeit, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of History Department Chair Andrew D. Nicholls, Ph.D., Professor of History To learn more about the History and Social Studies Education Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to http://history.buffalostate.edu/. Recommended Citation Stanford, Daniel P., "Ralph Raico: Champion of Authentic Liberalism" (2012). History Theses. Paper 13. Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/history_theses Part of the European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, and the United States History Commons Ralph Raico: Champion of Authentic Liberalism by Daniel P. Stanford An Abstract of a Thesis in History Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts December 2012 College at Buffalo State University of New York Department of History 1 ABSTRACT OF THESIS Ralph Raico: Champion of Authentic Liberalism This paper explores the intellectual life and writings of Professor Emeritus in History at Buffalo State College, Ralph Raico. The central thesis seeks to portray Professor Raico as the great modern libertarian revisionist historian, and the great modern champion of historical, classical liberalism. More broadly, the work attempts to solidify Professor Raico’s reputation as a major figure in the modern American libertarian movement. Raico’s intellectual foundations are fully developed, beginning from grade school at Bronx High School of Science, to his attendance of Ludwig von Mises’s New York University seminar, to his P.h.D.
  • The Billionaire Behind Efforts to Kill the U.S. Postal Service by Lisa Graves/True North Research for in the Public Interest

    The Billionaire Behind Efforts to Kill the U.S. Postal Service by Lisa Graves/True North Research for in the Public Interest

    The Billionaire Behind Efforts to Kill the U.S. Postal Service By Lisa Graves/True North Research for In the Public Interest JULY 2020 About Lisa Graves Lisa Graves is the Executive Director of True North and its editor-in-chief. She has spearheaded several major breakthrough investigations into those distorting American democracy and public policy. Her research and analysis have been cited by every major paper in the country, and featured in critically acclaimed books and documentaries including Ava DuVernay’s “The 13th.” She has appeared frequently on MSNBC as a guest on Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell as well as on other MSNBC shows. She has also served as a guest expert on CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNBC, BBC, C-SPAN, Amy Goodman’s Democracy Now!, the Laura Flanders Show, and other news shows. She’s written for the New York Times, Slate, TIME, the Nation, In These Times, the Progressive, PRWatch, Common Dreams, Yes!, and other outlets. Her research is cited in major books such as Dark Money by Jane Mayer, Give Us the Ballot by Ari Berman, Corporate Citizen by Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The Fall of Wisconsin by Dan Kaufman, and others. About In the Public Interest In the Public Interest is a research and policy center committed to promoting the common good and democratic control of public goods and services. We help citizens, public officials, advocacy groups, and researchers better understand the impacts that government contracts and public-private agreements have on service quality, democratic decision- making, and public budgets. Our goal is to ensure that government contracts, agreements, and related policies increase transparency, accountability, efficiency, and shared prosperity through the provision of public goods and services.
  • The Libertarian Review September 1975

    The Libertarian Review September 1975

    • © 1975, LIBERTARIAN REVIEW, INC an VOL. IV, NO.9-SEPTEMBER 1975 THE STATE By Franz Oppenheimer For centuries, the State and its intellectual apolo­ The State is unsurpassed in its analysis of the State as parasite and exploiter. gists have propagated the myth that the State is a Thus, Oppenheimer points out that there are two and only two ways by which voluntary instrument of society. Essential to that men can acquire income and wealth: One is through production and volun­ myth is the idea that the State arose on a volun­ tary exchange, what Oppenheimer calls "the economic means" to wealth, the tary, or at least on a natural, basis, arising organi­ means consonant with human nature and with the prosperity of mankind, the cally out of the needs of society. For if the State means which benefits all parties to the market and exchange process. The arose naturally or voluntarily, then it probably fol­ other means is robbery, the coercive looting and expropriation of someone :t>:;Y;:;:<1 ~::.:~:(" .;:,- ~:"~:: ::~:~:.., .. ~;;',:l~::::'i';; :'-:~::~:-: :~:~. lows that it fulfilled and still fulfills a vital societal else's production. This is the parasitic means, which not only violates the na­ function. Two major variants of the myth of State ture of man, but imposes a crippling burden on the victims and on production origins are the idea that the State arose out of a and economic growth. This path to wealth Oppenheimer called "the political "social contract" entered into by all members of means." Oppenheimer then goes on to define the State, on the basis of his society.
  • Professional Memo

    Professional Memo

    LNC Meeting Minutes, February 26-27, 2005, Portland, OR To: Libertarian National Committee From: Bob Sullentrup CC: Joe Seehusen Date: 2/27/2005 Version last updated March 1, 2005. Attendance Attending the February 26-27, 2005 LNC meeting in Portland, OR were Officers: Michael Dixon, Lee Wrights, Mark Nelson, Bob Sullentrup At-Large Representatives: BetteRose Ryan, Adm. Michael Colley, Mark Rutherford, Rick McGinnis, Bill Redpath Regional Representatives: Dan Karlan, Ed Hock, Aaron Starr, M Carling, Dena Bruedigam, Jim Lark, George Squyres Regional Alternates: Tony Ryan filling in for Jeremy Keil; Chris Farris filling in for Michael Gilson deLemos; Emily Salvette, Scott Lieberman Executive Director Joe Seehusen. Also attending were Sean Haugh, Adam Mayer, Jessica Neno-Wilson, George Getz, Richard Burke, Phil Schmitt (OR), Glenn Tatum, Shane Cory, Rene Kimbal and her mother. The meeting commenced at 8:33. Moment of Reflection Chair Michael Dixon called for a moment of reflection which has been our practice at LNC meetings. 1 Public Comment Oregon’s chair Adam Mayer chair welcomed the LNC to Portland and noted that this was the first time the LNC visited the state. Oregon Executive Director Richard Burke welcomed the LNC to attend the evening’s festivities including dinner with locals and a reception at the home of Frank and Margie Dane. Credentials Report Secretary Bob Sullentrup confirmed the attendance of the members and alternates listed above. For completeness, the following table lists the composition of the current LNC as accepted
  • Tv Trial for Westmoreland

    Tv Trial for Westmoreland

    VOLUME1, NUMBER14 SEPTEMBER17, 1984 50 CENTS TV TRIALFOR WESTMORELAND (4) o HOWTO FAKEA RESUME(14). AUDIOPARADISE (22) The Pd Ovei' W Rdrert K Landers fp/hen Ed Crane drives around !(ashing- It/ ton, he gets depressed. He sees all V Y those massivegovernment buildings, those "giant marble edifices," and he thinks of all thosebureaucrats inside. all those"thousands of people employed doing work that is counter- productive," not in his interest, not for his safe- ty, and God knows, not for his wallet. "Bureaucracy is a bad thing," he saysfrom be- \r\rcf WRMK Londerc f!|Z/hen Ed Crane drives around Washing- ll/ ton. he gets depressed. He sees all V V those massive government buildings, those "giant marble edifices," and he thinks of all those bureaucrats inside, all those "thousands of people employed doing work that is counter- productive," not in his interest, not for his safe- ry, and God knows, not for his wallec "Bureaucracy is a bad thing," he says from be. hind his desk in an elegant town house on Sec- ond Street Southeast, with the James Madison Building of the Library of Congress looming ominously outside his windows. "Government, whatever it does, is doing it be- caus€ people won't do it voluntarily. They don't want to. The government has become so large, so dangerous to our civil liberties, to our eco- nomic prosperity, to our ability to live. Be- cause," he continues, "they're going to start a war one of these days, and it's all, it just doesn't have to be, because if this country had followed the principles on which it was founded .
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2017

    The Public Eye, Summer 2017

    SUMMER 2017 The Public Eye In this issue: The Christian Right and Fourth Generation Warfare How Antisemitism Animates White Nationalism When Prison Ministries Prioritize Salvation Over Justice Charles Koch and the Makings of a Right-Wing Empire editor’s letter As the summer issue of The Public Eye ships to the printers, it’s been a whirlwind week. THE PUBLIC EYE Republicans’ efforts to overthrow Obamacare failed dramatically in the early hours of July QUARTERLY 28, but this victory followed some of the Trump administration’s most aggressive anti- PUBLISHER LGBTQ actions to date. Trump delivered an unprecedentedly ugly partisan speech to the Boy Tarso Luís Ramos Scouts of America, endorsed police brutality to a law enforcement audience, and publicly EDITOR mused about firing officials over the ongoing Russia investigation and pardoning himself Kathryn Joyce for what they may find. As many are now questioning if the administration is on a messy COVER ART slide towards authoritarianism, this issue homes in on some of what got us here. Ashley Lukashevsky Sociologist and former civilian intelligence analyst James Scaminaci takes a close look at a little-known right-wing strategy developed in LAYOUT “Fourth Generation Warfare” (pg. 4), Gabriel Joffe the 1980s and deployed over decades by strategists Paul Weyrich and William S. Lind. A fusion of military theory and the Christian Right agenda, Fourth Generation Warfare seeks PRINTING Red Sun Press to undermine the public’s confidence not just in the government and media, but in a com- monly-accepted reality itself. The result, Scaminaci writes, is “an all-out propaganda war EDITORIAL BOARD against secular liberalism” and the political mainstream, waged “with the same intensity Frederick Clarkson • Alex DiBranco as a shooting war.” Fourth Generation Warfare, he argues, set the template for Trump’s no- Tope Fadiran • Gabriel Joffe Kapya Kaoma • Greeley O’Connor holds-barred campaign against the political establishment.
  • Politically and Socially Rightist and Conservative

    Politically and Socially Rightist and Conservative

    A Dissertation Entitled “The Heart of the Battle Is Within:” Politically and Socially Rightist and Conservative Women and the Equal Rights Amendment By Chelsea A. Griffis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in History ____________________________________ Dr. Diane F. Britton, Committee Chair ____________________________________ Dr. Susan Hartmann, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Ronald Lora, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Kim E. Nielsen, Committee Member ____________________________________ Dr. Patricia Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2014 Copyright 2014, Chelsea A. Griffis This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the express permission of the author. An Abstract of “The Heart of the Battle Is Within:” Politically and Socially Rightist and Conservative Women and the Equal Rights Amendment by Chelsea A. Griffis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in History The University of Toledo May 2014 This dissertation analyzes the construction of divergent definitions of womanhood of politically and socially rightist and conservative women and how those definitions affected their stance for or against the Equal Rights Amendment. It argues that the way a woman defined her gender identity informed her position on the proposed amendment. Challenging the idea that all rightist and conservative women held a monolithic political ideology, this dissertation evaluates different women and women’s organizations of the right to show that this was not the case. Instead, some of these groups and individuals supported the ERA while opposed it.
  • 1 the Triumph and Crisis of Vital-Center Liberalism

    1 the Triumph and Crisis of Vital-Center Liberalism

    Notes 1 THE TRIUMPH AND CRISIS OF VITAL-CENTER LIBERALISM 1. Michael D. Reagan, Regulation: The Politics of Policy (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1987), 9. 2. Nigel Ashford, "Liberalism," in Dictionary of Conservative and Libertarian Thought, Nigel Ashford and Stephen Davies, eds (London: Routledge, 1991), 160. 3. Ronald D. Rotunda, "The 'Liberal' Label: Roosevelt's Capture of a Symbol," Public Policy 17 (1968): 39. Modern devotees of nine­ teenth-century liberalism, frustrated by this appropriation of "liberal­ ism" by advocates of the mixed economy, were forced to use such circumlocutions as "classical liberal," "libertarian," or, in Friedrich A. Hayek's case, "old Whig." See Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962), 5-6; Louis M. Spadaro, foreword to Liberalism in the Classical Tradition, 3rd ed. by Ludwig von Mises, trans. Ralph Raico (Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education, 1985), xiv-xv; and Friedrich A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (South Bend, IN: Gateway Editions, 1972), 407-11. 4. Alonzo L. Hamby, Liberalism and Its Challengers: F. D. R. to Bush, 2nd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 4. 5. Carl M. Degler, "The Ordeal of Herbert Hoover," The Yale Review 52 (Summer 1993): 563-83. Richard K. Vedder and Lowell E. Gallaway recently have argued that unemployment during the Great Depression was so severe precisely because Hoover's support for high tariffs and maintenance of nominal wages during a deflation resulted in an actual increase in real wages at a time of decreasing labor demand. See Richard K. Vedder and Lowell E. Gallaway, Out of Work: Unemployment and Government in Twentieth-Century America (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1993), 89-92.