DOCSLIB.ORG

Otter Tail River Watershed WRAPS Report Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 10 Appendix G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Otter Tail River Watershed WRAPS Report Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 10 Appendix G Watershed September 2021 Otter Tail River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report Authors Moriya Rufer, MS, CLM, Houston Engineering, Inc. Scott Kronholm, PhD, Houston Engineering, Inc. 7550 Meridian Circle North, Maple Grove, MN 55369 Contributors/acknowledgements Darren Newville and Ben Underhill East Otter Tail Soil and Water Conservation District 801 Jenny Ave SW, Ste #2, Perham, MN 56573 Scott Schroeder and Danielle Kvasager Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 714 Lake Ave, Ste 220, Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 Timothy Erickson and Lori Han Houston Engineering 7550 Meridian Circle North, Maple Grove, MN 55369 Watershed Partners: Thank you to the contributing Watershed Partners in the Otter Tail River Watershed that contributed to this document: Becker County Becker Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Water and Soil Resources Buffalo Red River Watershed District Cormorant Lakes Watershed District East Otter Tail Soil and Water Conservation District Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Otter Tail County Pelican River Watershed District Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge West Otter Tail Soil and Water Conservation District Wilkin County Wilkin Soil and Water Conservation District Editing and graphic design Dan Olson Cover photo credit: Jinny Fricke Detroit Lake. Detroit Lakes, Minnesota. July 1, 2019 Courtesy of Moriya Rufer. The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to a wider audience. Visit our website for more information. The MPCA reports are printed on 100% post-consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Document number: wq-ws4-82a Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures............................................................................................................................................... iii Key terms ..................................................................................................................................................... iv Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................... v Executive summary ............................................................................................................................ vii What is the WRAPS report? ........................................................................................................................ ix 1. Watershed background and description ....................................................................................... 1 2. Watershed conditions .................................................................................................................. 4 Condition status ................................................................................................................................. 7 Water quality trends ........................................................................................................................ 24 Stressors and sources ....................................................................................................................... 29 TMDL summary ................................................................................................................................ 42 Protection considerations ................................................................................................................ 45 3. Prioritizing and implementing restoration and protection .......................................................... 61 Targeting of geographic areas .......................................................................................................... 62 Climate change considerations ........................................................................................................ 75 Public participation .......................................................................................................................... 77 Restoration and protection strategies ............................................................................................. 80 4. Monitoring plan ....................................................................................................................... 125 5. References and further information ......................................................................................... 127 6. Appendices .............................................................................................................................. 129 Otter Tail River WRAPS Report Minnesota Pollution Control Agency i List of Tables ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table 1. Assessment status of river reaches in the OTRW. .......................................................................... 9 Table 2. Impaired stream reaches in the OTRW. ........................................................................................ 13 Table 3. Assessment status of lakes in the OTRW. ..................................................................................... 15 Table 4. Impaired lakes in the OTRW1. ....................................................................................................... 23 Table 5. Water quality trends of the sampled streams within the OTRW1 ................................................ 25 Table 6. Water quality trends of the sampled lakes within the OTRW1 ..................................................... 25 Table 7. Total Phosphorus, Chlorophyll-a, and Secchi trends within the lakes of the OTRW. ................... 26 Table 8. Summary of common biotic stressors assessed as potential candidate causes for the biologically impaired reaches within the OTRW. ........................................................................................................... 30 Table 9. Primary stressors to aquatic life in biologically impaired stream reaches in the OTRW. ............. 31 Table 10. Summary of common biotic stressors assessed as potential candidate causes for the biologically impaired lakes within the OTRW. ............................................................................................ 32 Table 11. Primary stressors to aquatic life in biologically impaired lakes in the OTRW. ............................ 33 Table 12. Nonpoint sources in the OTRW.1 ................................................................................................ 36 Table 13. Point sources in the OTRW.1 ....................................................................................................... 40 Table 14. TMDL summary for all streams being addressed with TMDLs in the OTRW. ............................. 43 Table 15. TMDL summary for all lakes being addressed with TMDLs in the OTRW. .................................. 44 Table 16. Protection and Restoration Classifications in Streams in the OTRW. ......................................... 46 Table 17. Stream protection and prioritization. ......................................................................................... 48 Table 18. OTRW Lake Prioritization Summary for TP risk. .......................................................................... 50 Table 19. Lake phosphorus load management focus (HSPF)1 ..................................................................... 57 Table 20. Summary of the stressors associated with the biologically vulnerable lakes in the OTRW........ 61 Table 21. Fair share load reduction goals for the OTRW. ........................................................................... 64 Table 22. Additional tools available for restoration and protection of impaired and nonimpaired waters. .................................................................................................................................................................... 72 Table 23. BMPs implemented in the OTRW between 2004-2019 (MPCA 2020a and PRWD 2020). .......... 85 Table 24. Strategies and actions proposed for the OTRW. ......................................................................... 87 Table 25. Strategies that can be implemented to meet or help meet water quality goals in the OTRW. 105 Table 26. A variety of BMPs which can be used to target and improve various water quality parameters. .................................................................................................................................................................. 107 Otter Tail River WRAPS Report Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ii List of Figures ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Figure 1. Photo of Pelican Lake. ...................................................................................................................... Figure 2. Diagram of the watershed cycle in Minnesota. ............................................................................ ix Figure 3. Land use within the OTRW. .............................................................................................................. Figure 4. Detroit Lake. ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Ecology and Habitat Preference of the Leopard Darter, Percina Pantherina
    REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA By PAUL WILLIAM /~AMES Bachelor of Science University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 1981 ·4::er of Science ...1.issouri State University 3pringfield, Missouri 1983 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the·Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY July, 1989 . - ~· ,• ) "' Oklahoma State Univ. Lihra1 REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND HABITAT PREFERENCE OF THE LEOPARD DARTER, PERCINA PANTHERINA Thesis Approved: ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my advisor, Dr. o. Eugene Maughan, for giving me the opportunity to work on this project and for his encouragement throughout my graduate program. I would also like to thank the members of my graduate committee, Dr. William A. Drew, Dr. Anthony A. Echelle, Dr. Rudolph J. Miller, and Dr. Alexander v. Zale, for their professional and personal advice throughout the course of the study. I wish to extend my sincere gratitude to the u. s. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for providing financial and technical support for the study. I am especially grateful to Mr. Frank James of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation's McCurtain County Wilderness Area for his friendship and hospitality during extended field trips. A sincere thanks goes to Rick Horton, Steve O'Donnell, and Todd Phillips for their help in the field and laboratory. A special thanks goes to Stuart Leon for helping with the development of many of the field and data analysis techniques used in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyfishid[1].Pdf
    Kentucky Fishes Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission To conserve, protect and enhance Kentucky’s fish and wildlife resources and provide outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing, trapping, boating, shooting sports, wildlife viewing, and related activities. Federal Aid Project funded by your purchase of fishing equipment and motor boat fuels Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources #1 Sportsman’s Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 1-800-858-1549 • fw.ky.gov Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission Kentucky Fishes by Matthew R. Thomas Fisheries Program Coordinator 2011 (Third edition, 2021) Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources Division of Fisheries Cover paintings by Rick Hill • Publication design by Adrienne Yancy Preface entucky is home to a total of 245 native fish species with an additional 24 that have been introduced either intentionally (i.e., for sport) or accidentally. Within Kthe United States, Kentucky’s native freshwater fish diversity is exceeded only by Alabama and Tennessee. This high diversity of native fishes corresponds to an abun- dance of water bodies and wide variety of aquatic habitats across the state – from swift upland streams to large sluggish rivers, oxbow lakes, and wetlands. Approximately 25 species are most frequently caught by anglers either for sport or food. Many of these species occur in streams and rivers statewide, while several are routinely stocked in public and private water bodies across the state, especially ponds and reservoirs. The largest proportion of Kentucky’s fish fauna (80%) includes darters, minnows, suckers, madtoms, smaller sunfishes, and other groups (e.g., lam- preys) that are rarely seen by most people.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa-Darter-Life-Minnesota.Pdf
    9 American Currents Vol. 39, No. 3 A LIFE HISTORY STUDY OF MINNESOTA’S GREAT NORTHERNER: THE IOWA DARTER Jay T. Hatch Dept. of Postsecondary Teaching and Learning and James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota James D. Johnson Earth Science Department, St. Francis High School, St. Francis, MN in Canada and among the seven most widespread darter species in the United States. The Great Northerner also is highly variable in terms of its body shape and color. In Minnesota alone, males looking for mates might wear any one of at least three distinctly different colored suits (see page 11). Even its collection of genes is odd enough to make it hard to say who its closest relatives are. Finally, it is one of eight darter species known to inhabit lakes as well as streams. So, it is a bit surprising that only two popula- tions have been the subjects of detailed life history studies, one in Nebraska (Evans 1974) and one in Wyoming (Copes 1976, published in our very own American Currents). Vari- ous bits of information on about 17 additional populations scattered from Colorado to Ontario appear in a variety of published and unpublished works. In Minnesota, the Iowa Darter is one of our most com- mon and widespread fish species. It occurs in every major basin of the state, although it occurs less frequently in areas of intensive row-cropping (Figure 1). We became interested in this species back in the 1980s while studying the larval fishes of Lake Itasca, the official but incorrect headwaters of the mighty Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • Percidae: Etheostoma Raneyi) in Disjunct Watersheds of Northern Mississippi
    Cryptic diversity among Yazoo Darters (Percidae: Etheostoma raneyi) in disjunct watersheds of northern Mississippi Ken A. Sterling1, Stuart V. Nielsen2, Andrew J. Brown3, Melvin L. Warren, Jr.1 and Brice P. Noonan4 1 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Stream Ecology Laboratory, Oxford, MS, United States of America 2 Division of Herpetology, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, FL, United States of America 3 Louisiana Purchase Gardens and Zoo, Monroe, LA, United States of America 4 Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, United States of America ABSTRACT The Yazoo Darter, Etheostoma raneyi (Percidae), is an imperiled freshwater fish species endemic to tributaries of the Yocona and Little Tallahatchie rivers of the upper Yazoo River basin, in northern Mississippi, USA. The two populations are allopatric, isolated by unsuitable lowland habitat between the two river drainages. Relevant literature suggests that populations in the Yocona River represent an undescribed species, but a lack of data prevents a thorough evaluation of possible diversity throughout the range of the species. Our goals were to estimate phylogenetic relationships of the Yazoo Darter across its distribution and identify cryptic diversity for conservation management purposes. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene returned two reciprocally monophyletic clades representing the two river drainages with high support. Bayesian analysis of cytb was consistent with the ML analysis but with low support for the Yocona River clade. Analyses of the nuclear S7 gene yielded unresolved relationships among individuals in the Little Tallahatchie River drainage with mostly low support, but returned a monophyletic clade for individuals from the Yocona River drainage with high support.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from The
    Distribution Changes of Small Fishes in Streams of Missouri from the 1940s to the 1990s by MATTHEW R. WINSTON Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO 65201 February 2003 CONTENTS Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… 10 Methods……………………………………………………………………………….. 17 The Data Used………………………………………………………………… 17 General Patterns in Species Change…………………………………………... 23 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 26 Results………………………………………………………………………………… 34 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 30 Conservation Status of Species……………………………………………….. 46 Discussion…………………………………………………………………………….. 63 General Patterns in Species Change………………………………………….. 53 Conservation Status of Species………………………………………………. 63 Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………. 66 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………………….. 66 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………… 72 FIGURES 1. Distribution of samples by principal investigator…………………………. 20 2. Areas of greatest average decline…………………………………………. 33 3. Areas of greatest average expansion………………………………………. 34 4. The relationship between number of basins and ……………………….. 39 5. The distribution of for each reproductive group………………………... 40 2 6. The distribution of for each family……………………………………… 41 7. The distribution of for each trophic group……………...………………. 42 8. The distribution of for each faunal region………………………………. 43 9. The distribution of for each stream type………………………………… 44 10. The distribution of for each range edge…………………………………. 45 11. Modified
    [Show full text]
  • Red River of the North “A Winding Journey to History
    RED RIVER OF THE NORTH “A WINDING JOURNEY TO HISTORY” Headwaters at Breckenridge, Minnesota, U.S.A. By NEOMA A. LAKEN 2010 CONTENTS WELCOME FOREWORD INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 General Information CHAPTER 2 Prehistoric Heritage CHAPTER 3 Converging Rivers CHAPTER 4 Steamboats, Flatboats & Barges CHAPTER 5 Graham’s Point, Pre-1819 Trading Post CHAPTER 6 Red River Oxcarts CHAPTER 7 Fort Abercrombie, Dakota Territory CHAPTER 8 Sister River Cities: Breckenridge, MN Wahpeton, ND CHAPTER 9 Red River of the North Flooding CHAPTER 10 Flora and Fauna CHAPTER 11 Renewed Vision for the Red River of the North EPILOG REFERENCES - 2 - WELCOME... Breckenridge, Wilkin County, Minnesota, United States of America, and Wahpeton, Richland County, North Dakota, United States of America, welcome you to the Red River of the North. Some of the information contained comes from the records in the office of the County Recorder, in the Wilkin County Courthouse, Breckenridge MN. Some is local historical lore passed on to generations throughout the years and told to the author. While yet other information is a meshing of historical facts. As with the telling of any history, sagas differ slightly with the various perspectives of the authors. I hope you will find your visit to the Red River of the North a pleasant one. Enjoy your visit . and come back soon! Neoma A. Laken, Author 108 North 15th Street Breckenridge, Minnesota 56520 United States of America All rights in and to this book reserved by author. No portion may be reprinted without permission. Additional copies of this book are available from River Keepers, 325 7th St South, Fargo, ND 58103, www.riverkeepers.org for a cost of $10.
    [Show full text]
  • Otter Tail County Local Water Management Plan
    Otter Tail County Local Water Management Plan August 31, 2009 – August 31, 2019 (Amended 2014) Bayerl Water Prepared by Bayerl Water Resources, with mapping by Otter Tail County GIS Department and BWSR and technical Resources assistance from the LWMP task force TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... I-1 A. Background .........................................................................................................................I ‐1 B. Plan Purpose ...................................................................................................................... I ‐1 C. Description of Priority Concerns .........................................................................................I‐2 D. Consistency with Other Plans ............................................................................................. I ‐2 E. Recommendations to Other Plans and Official Controls .................................................... I ‐3 II. PRIORITY CONCERNS ...................................................................................................... II-1 A. Priority Concerns Identification ................................................................................ II ‐1 1. Surface Water Issues ..................................................................................................................II‐6 a) Water Quality...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition
    Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition Pictures from – NANFA (2017) Warren Lamb Aquatic Biology Program Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN 56601 Introduction Minnesota’s landscape is maze of lakes and river that are home to a recorded total of 163 species of fish. This document is a complete and current dichotomous taxonomic key of the Minnesota fishes. This key was based on the 1972 “Northern Fishes” key (Eddy 1972), and updated based on Dr. Jay Hatch’s article “Minnesota Fishes: Just How Many Are There?” (Hatch 2016). Any new species or family additions were also referenced to the 7th edition of the American Fisheries society “Names of North American Fishes” (Page et al. 2013) to assess whether a fish species is currently recognized by the scientific community. Identifying characteristics for new additions were compared to those found in Page and Burr (2011). In total five species and one family have been added to the taxonomic key, while three have been removed since the last publication. Species pictures within the keys have been provide from either Bemidji State University Ichthyology Students or North American Native Fish Association (NANFA). My hope is that this document will offer an accurate and simple key so anyone can identify the fish they may encounter in Minnesota. Warren Lamb – 2017 Pictures from – NANFA (2017) References Eddy, S. and J. C. Underhill. 1974. Northern Fishes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 414 pp. Hatch, J. 2015. Minnesota fishes: just how many are there anyway? American Currents 40:10-21. Page, L. M. and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Kansas Fishes
    CHECKLIST OF KANSAS FISHES From "A Checklist of the Vertebrate Animals of Kansas", second edition, 1999, by George Potts, Joseph Collins and Kate Shaw (Species marked with an asterisk * are extirpated from the wild in Kansas.) 142 Species REFERENCE: Fishes in Kansas, 2nd edition, 1995 By Frank Cross and Joseph Collins, KU Press Order of Lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) Family Petromyzontidae Chestnut Lamprey - Ichthyomyzon castaneus Order of Sturgeons and Paddlefish (Acipenseriformes) Family Acipenseridae Lake Sturgeon - Acipenser fulvescens Pallid Sturgeon - Scaphirhynchus albus Shovelnose Sturgeon - Scaphirhynchus platorynchus Family Polyodontidae Paddlefish - Polyodon spathula Order of Gars (Semionotiformes) Family Lepisosteidae Spotted Gar - Lepisosteus oculatus Longnose Gar - Lepisosteus osseus Shortnose Gar - Lepisosteus platostomus Order of Bowfins (Amiiformes) Family Amiidae Bowfin - Amia calva Order of Bony-tongued fishes (Osteoglossiformes) Family Hiodontidae Goldeye - Hiodon alosoides * Mooneye - Hiodon tergisus Order of Eels (Anguilliformes) Family Anguillidae American Eel - Anguilla rostrata Order of Herrings (Clupeiformes) Family Clupeidae Skipjack Herring - Alosa chrysochloris Gizzard Shad - Dorosoma cepedianum Threadfin Shad - Dorosoma petenense Page 1 of 5 Order of Carp-like fishes (Cypriniformes) Family Cyprinidae Central Stoneroller - Campostoma anomalum Goldfish - Carassius auratus Grass Carp - Ctenopharyngodon idella Bluntface Shiner - Cyprinella camura Red Shiner - Cyprinella lutrensis Spotfin Shiner - Cyprinella spiloptera
    [Show full text]
  • Otter Tail Lake 56-0242-00 OTTER TAIL COUNTY
    Otter Tail Lake 56-0242-00 OTTER TAIL COUNTY Lake Water Quality Summary Otter Tail Lake is located at the city of Ottertail, MN in Otter Tail County. It is a long and oval lake covering 14,074 acres (Table 1), and is the seventh deepest and tenth largest lake in Minnesota. Otter Tail Lake has five inlets and one outlet, which classify it as a drainage lake. The main inlets are the Otter Tail River, which enters on the northeast corner of the lake, and the Dead River, which enters on the northwest side of the lake. The Otter Tail River outlets at the southwest corner of the lake and eventually joins the Red River. Water quality data have been collected on Otter Tail Lake since 1969 (Tables 2 & 3). These data show that the lake is mesotrophic (TSI = 46) with moderately clear water conditions most of the summer and excellent recreational opportunities. Otter Tail Lake is a part of the Otter Tail Lake Property Owners Association. OTLPOA was incorporated on January 5, 1967. Since its beginning, the association has been focused on the preservation of fish and wildlife, water quality, and the prevention of invasive species. OTLPOA is also a member of the Otter Tail Coalition of Lake Associations (COLA). Table 1. Otter Tail Lake location and key physical characteristics. Location Data Physical Characteristics MN Lake ID: 56-0242-00 Surface area (acres): 14,074 County: Otter Tail Littoral area (acres): 6,717 North Central Hardwood % Littoral area: 48 Ecoregion: Forests Max depth (ft), (m): 112, 34.1 Major Drainage Basin: Red River Inlets: 5 Latitude/Longitude: 46.3982/-95.6626 Outlets: 1 Invasive Species: None as of 2013 Public Accesses: 4 Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Otter Tail River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
    Watershed health May 2019 Otter Tail River Monitoring and Assessment Report The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Authors by using the Internet to distribute reports and Dave Dollinger information to wider audience. Visit our Megan Handt website for more information. Cadie Olson Sophia Vaughan MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- Mark Gernes consumer recycled content paper Andrew Butzer manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Shawn Nelson derivatives. Bruce Monson Contributors/acknowledgements Becker County SWCD Bemidji State University Buffalo Red River Watershed District Citizen Lake Monitoring Program Volunteers Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Clearwater County Clearwater County SWCD Headwaters Science Center Interstate Engineering Minnesota Department of Agriculture Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Otter Tail County Coalition of Lake Associations Pelican River Watershed District Red Lake Watershed District Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund Tamarac Interpretive Association (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Tamarac National Wildlife Refuge White Earth Nation Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | 651-296-6300 | 800-657-3864 | Or use your preferred relay service. | [email protected] This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us. Document number: wq-ws3-09020103b Contents List of acronyms ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]