DOCSLIB.ORG

Rethinking the Past Defining the Future Rethinking The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rethinking the Past Defining the Future Rethinking The History of Women Philosophers and Scientists historyofwomenphilosophers.org THE XVIIITH SYMPOSIUM OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN PHILOSOPHERS paderborn university, germany july 18-21, 2021 DEFINING THE FUTURE 2021 RETHINKING THE PAST PHILOSOPHY OF ECONOMICS ENVIRONMENTAL PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY COVID-19 AND PHILOSOPHY Shohreh Bayat · Federica Giardini · Lisa Herzog Kateryna Karpenko · Elizabeth Suzanne Kassab · Yuko Murakami Julie A. Nelson · Caterina Pello · Gisele Secco · Mpho Tshivhase Xiao Wei Dorota Dutsch · Cintia Martínez Velasco · Mary Ellen Waithe Sigridur Thorgeirsdottir · Ruth Edith Hagengruber 1 WELCOME TO THE IAPH CONFERENCE AT THE CENTER FOR THE HISTORY OF WOMEN PHILOSOPHERS AND SCIENTISTS The International Association of Women Philosophers (IAPh) is an initiative to promote women’s research in philosophy and its history. Founded in Germany in 1976, it is now a global network for all women in philosophy. Given its strong tradition, IAPh covers all philosophical disciplines, including feminist philosophy as well as the history of women philosophers. After holding conferences in such venues as Monash University, Melbourne (2016) and Tsinghua University, Beijing (2018), the 18th world congress of IAPh will be hosted by the Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists (HWPS) at Paderborn University, Germany. As the director of the Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists and the Head of the Teaching and Research Area EcoTechGender, I feel very much honored to host this conference. Initially planned as the IAPH’ biannual symposia, this conference had to be postponed due to the Covid pandemic. As the pandemic is still a threat to many of us, it will take place as a hybrid event. In times of great global concern, rapid technological progress, climate change, and economic turmoil, we invite women’s contributions to present their ideas concerning the future, while taking a critical look back into the past. Women’s voices have been suppressed in the past few centuries in nearly all countries and cultures of the world, and to differing extents. To end this societal contradiction is a considerable challenge and it demands that women raise their voices. 2 Women, though excluded for too long, are nevertheless not without responsibility. Now is the time to present their ideas in the relevant fields related to the human condition and to contribute to shaping the future. With more than one hundred and sixty contributors from all parts of the world, from Israel and the Arab world, from China and the United States, Canada, Japan, Russia, India, Australia, Brazil, Argentina, Uganda, Netherlands, Latvia, Turkey, Poland, Spain, Finland, Taiwan, Greece, Italy, France, United Kingdom and Germany and about twenty keynotes from China, Latin Amerika, Ukraine, South Africa, Japan, Iran, United States and more, we dare to take the first steps to a new understanding of how to shape this future such that it might shape a better world for all. As the conference organizer, I am indebted to the board of the IAPH for entrusting me with the Organization of this conference. I am grateful to the Center’s Team for its support in sharing with me the idea and work in promoting the ideas of women philosophers and granting me their support to organize this conference. I am especially grateful to Felix Grewe, scholar in the project EcoTechGender, and would like to thank him for his patience, skills and circumspection with which he has organized this conference. Last but not least, I am grateful to all the speakers who bring in their ideas, who take part, and demonstrate how this world can be united in thought, who care about the world we live in. I am also grateful to all the participants who share their time and their attention in listening to us all. Without them, nothing happens and nothing changes. Let’s take this conference as a first step towards enhancing the intellectual global power of women philosophers to shape the future by rethinking the past. Paderborn, July 2021 Ruth Edith Hagengruber 3 Table of Contents Keynote Speakers ................................................................................... 6 Program Main Room ............................................................................. 26 Economy Session Program Monday, July 19, 2021 .......................................................................... 28 Technology Session Monday, July 19, 2021 .......................................................................... 30 Technology Session Tuesday, July 20, 2021 .......................................................................... 32 Technology Session Wednesday, July 21, 2021 .................................................................... 34 Environment & Food Ethics Session Program Wednesday, July 21, 2021 .................................................................... 36 History 1 - Session Program Monday, July 19, 2021 .......................................................................... 38 History 1 - Session Program Tuesday, July 20, 2021 .......................................................................... 40 History 1 - Session Program Wednesday, July 21, 2021 .................................................................... 42 History 2 - Session Program Monday, July 19, 2021 .......................................................................... 44 History 2 - Session Program Tuesday, July 20, 2021 .......................................................................... 46 History 2 - Session Program Wednesday, July 21, 2021 .................................................................... 48 History 3 - Session Program Monday, July 19, 2021 .......................................................................... 50 History 3 - Session Program Tuesday, July 20, 2021 .......................................................................... 52 COVID-19 and Philosophy Session Program Monday, July 19, 2021 .......................................................................... 53 4 Workshop Feminist and Decolonial Strategies for the Teaching and Promotion of Philosophy ............................................... 54 Workshop Women in Early Phenomenology ......................................................... 55 Workshop Women in Early Phenomenology ......................................................... 56 Workshop German Idealism and Feminist Philosophy ........................................ 57 Workshop Die IAPh – Ihre Anfänge - in German................................................... 58 Workshop Diana Tietjens Meyers on Autonomy ................................................... 59 Workshop Latin American HWPS – in Spanish with English Powerpoints Emerging Women Philosophers Networks in Latin America .................................................................................... 60 Workshop Latin American HWPS – in Spanish with English Powerpoints Violencia y Género en México .............................................................. 61 Workshop Hacking Diotimas Eros (in German) .................................................... 62 Workshop Philosophy and the Problem of Superiorism ...................................... 64 Workshop Latin American HWPS – in Spanish with English Powerpoints Violencia y Género en México .............................................................. 65 Submitters ............................................................................................. 66 5 Keynote Speakers Shohreh Chess Referee, Women’s The impact of religion Page 8 Bayat right activist on women’s right London, UK Dorota Professor of Classics, Knowledge Bites: Wo- Page 8 Dutsch UC Santa Barbara, USA men Philosophers and the Greek Paideia Federica Professor of Philosophy, Ecology and Economy. Page 9 Giardini Università Roma Tre, Italy Feminist perspectives. Ruth E. Professor of Philosophy, Out of the Box – into Page 10 Hagengruber Paderborn University, the Green and the Blue. Director of the Center Drafting an Epistemo- HWPS, Germany logy of a Post Humanist Interrelatedness Lisa Herzog Professor of Philosophy Economic Knowledge, Page 12 University of Groningen, Democratic Knowledge Netherlands Kateryna Professor of Philosophy, Gender Injustice and Page 13 Karpenko Kharkiv National Medical ecological Issues University, Ukraine Elizabeth Associate Professor of Women in Writing the Page 14 Suzanne Philosophy, Doha Institute History of Contemporary Kassab for Graduate Studies, Arab Philosophy Qatar Cintia Professor of Philosophy, Chiasmic Identities Page 15 Martinez UNAM, Mexico and Femicide in Latin Velasco America: Reflections from a Decolonial and Marxist-Feminist Perspective Yuko Professor of Philosophy, “Education” to obscure Page 17 Murakami Rikkyo University, Japan academic women in Japan 6 Herta Nagl- Professor emerita of The beginnings: Page 18 Docekal Philosophy, University of a fragmented Vienna, Austria retrospective of a former speaker of IAPh Julie A. Nelson Professor emerita of Economic Theory and Page 19 economics, Moral Imaginationv University of Massachusetts, Boston, US Caterina Pellò Associate Lecturer in Women in the Pythago- Page 19 Philosophy, rean tradition: Perictio- St. Andrews College, UK ne on Philosophy and Science Gisele Secco Associate Professor of Form Computers to Page 20 Philosophy, Diagrams and Back: The Federal University of Four-Color Theorem Santa Maria, Brazil and the Rise of a New Mathematical Culture Sigridur Professor of Philosophy,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ascribing Sexual Orientations
    Atlantis Vol. 13 No.2 Spring/Printemps 1988 Ascribing Sexual Orientations Christine Overall Queen's University ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to suggest a somewhat different approach to the contemporary discussion of human sexual orientations. Instead of examining the nature of sexual orientation itself, it discusses the meanings of ascriptions of sexual orientation. (The discussion is confined to cases where the subject of ascription is female.) The paper begins with a survey of some prevalent ways of interpreting ascriptions of sexual orientation. It then comments on the variations in their meanings, and considers what the speaker is doing when uttering such an ascription. It concludes with some comments about an apparently anomalous sexual orientation, bisexuality. My interest in the ascription of sexual orientations what it is to be a lesbian (let alone a lesbian bisexual), and arose, in part, from three observations which I made over how one is to know whether any person (including one• the course of the past year.1 First, in my investigations of self) is one. ethical issues pertaining to reproductive technology, it became very clear that access to such processes as in vitro I was troubled, then, by both ontological and epistemo- fertilization and artificial insemination by donor is regu• logical problems: What is it to be lesbian or heterosexual lated and limited by means of the physician-enforced stip• or bisexual? How does one know whether a person is ulation that the female candidates for these technologies lesbian or heterosexual
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Women Philosophers Vol. IV
    A HISTORY OF WOMEN PHILOSOPHERS A History of Women Philosophers 1. Ancient Women Philosophers, 600 B.C.-500 A.D. 2. Medieval, Renaissance and Enlightenment Women Philosophers, 500-1600 3. Modern Women Philosophers, 1600-1900 4. Contemporary Women Philosophers, 1900-today PROFESSOR C. J. DE VOGEL A History of Women Philosophers Volume 4 Contemporary Women Philosophers 1900-today Edited by MARY ELLEN WAITHE Cleveland State University, Cleveland, U.S.A. Springer-Science+Business Media, B. V. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Contemporary women philosophers : 1900-today / edited by Mary Ellen Waithe. p. cm. -- (A History of women philosophers ; v. 4.) Includes bibliographical references (p. xxx-xxx) and index. ISBN 978-0-7923-2808-7 ISBN 978-94-011-1114-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-1114-0 1. Women philosophers. 2. Philosophy. Modern--20th century. r. Waithe. Mary Ellen. II. Series. Bl05.W6C66 1994 190' .82--dc20 94-9712 ISBN 978-0-7923-2808-7 printed an acid-free paper AII Rights Reserved © 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1995 Softcover reprint ofthe hardcover lst edition 1995 No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. Contents Acknowledgements xv Introduction to Volume 4, by Mary Ellen Waithe xix 1. Victoria, Lady Welby (1837-1912), by William Andrew 1 Myers I. Introduction 1 II. Biography 1 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Equality, Priority and Nonhuman Animals*
    Equality, Priority and Catia Faria Nonhuman Animals* Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Law [email protected] http://upf.academia.edu/catiafaria Igualdad, prioridad y animales no humanos ABSTRACT: This paper assesses the implications of egali- RESUMEN: Este artículo analiza las implicaciones del iguali- tarianism and prioritarianism for the consideration of tarismo y del prioritarismo en lo que refiere a la conside- nonhuman animals. These implications have been often ración de los animales no humanos. Estas implicaciones overlooked. The paper argues that neither egalitarianism han sido comúnmente pasadas por alto. Este artículo de- nor prioritarianism can consistently deprive nonhuman fenderá que ni el igualitarismo ni el prioritarismo pueden animals of moral consideration. If you really are an egali- privar de forma consistente de consideración moral a los tarian (or a prioritarian) you are necessarily committed animales no humanos. Si realmente alguien es igualitaris- both to the rejection of speciesism and to assigning prior- ta (o prioritarista) ha de tener necesariamente una posi- ity to the interests of nonhuman animals, since they are ción de rechazo del especismo, y estar a favor de asignar the worst-off. From this, important practical consequen- prioridad a los intereses de los animales no humanos, ces follow for the improvement of the current situation of dado que estos son los que están peor. De aquí se siguen nonhuman animals. importantes consecuencias prácticas para la mejora de la situación actual de los animales no humanos. KEYWORDS: egalitarianism, prioritarianism, nonhuman ani- PALABRAS-CLAVE: igualitarismo, prioritarismo, animales no hu- mals, speciesism, equality manos, especismo, igualdad 1. Introduction It is commonly assumed that human beings should be given preferential moral consideration, if not absolute priority, over the members of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • H-France Review Vol. 14 (July 2014), No. 112 Florence Lotterie, Le Genre
    H-France Review Volume 14 (2014) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 14 (July 2014), No. 112 Florence Lotterie, Le Genre des Lumières: Femme et philosophe au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013. 336 pp. Bibliography and index of names. $90.00 U.S. (hb). ISBN 978-28124-1025-3. Review by Jennifer M. Jones, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Book V of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Émile, which proposed the striking model of Sophie’s feminine alterity, remains a touchstone for scholars of women and gender in eighteenth-century France. In the past two decades, however, historians have moved well beyond Rousseau in their exploration of the gendered history of the Enlightenment, scouring sources and sites that range from fashion magazines and salons to colonial treatises and pornographic literature. Drawing on the new social history of ideas in the 1970s and inspired by engagement with Jürgen Habermas’s model of the “public sphere” from the late 1980s, gender historians have continued to expand their field of inquiry.[1] Florence Lotterie reminds us, however, that scholars still have much to learn about how philosophy itself was gendered in the eighteenth century. She argues that the figure of the female philosopher stood at the center of both eighteenth-century fears and fantasies about the difference between the sexes and new definitions of philosophy itself. Florence Lotterie, professor of eighteenth-century French literature at the University of Paris VII Denis Diderot, is an especially learned guide to the gendered “mind of the Enlightenment”
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Women Leave Philosophy?
    Philosophers’ volume 16, no. 6 1. When do women leave philosophy? Imprint march 2016 In 2012 in the United States, for every 100 men graduating with a col- lege degree, 141 women graduated.1 For decades now, more women have been enrolled in American universities than men. Yet, during these same decades, the proportion of women who major in philos- ophy has remained stagnant, hovering below one-third. So, while al- WHY DO WOMEN LEAVE most 60% of college graduates are now women, only 30% of philoso- phy majors are women (Department of Education, 2013; Paxton et al., 2012). In the humanities, religion and theology (35.6%) is the closest PHILOSOPHY? SURVEYING major to philosophy when it comes to the underrepresentation of fe- male majors. Among all majors, the only ones with similarly low ratios are economics (31%), physics (19.7%), computer science (22%), and en- gineering (20%).2 STUDENTS AT THE With women getting just 30% of philosophy bachelor’s degrees, it’s no surprise that the ratio of women to men is so low among philos- ophy graduate students (30%) and professors (20.7%) (Paxton et al., INTRODUCTORY LEVEL 2012; Norlock, 2012).3 The underrepresentation and treatment of fe- male graduate students and professors in philosophy has, for good rea- son, received increasing attention in recent years. But there has been limited discussion, and very few empirical investigations, of why so Morgan Thompson∗, Toni Adleberg†, Sam many women say goodbye to philosophy just after being introduced to it. In this article, we offer our initial attempts to gather data to test Sims‡, Eddy Nahmias§ various hypotheses aimed at answering this question and to suggest University of Pittsburgh∗, University of California, San Diego†, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Philosophy: Problems with the Discrimination Hypothesis
    Log In WOMEN IN PHILOSOPHY: PROBLEMS WITH THE DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS Dec 10, 2014 | Neven Sesardic, Rafael De Clercq Your Email Address Neven Sesardic is professor of philosophy at Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong Kong; [email protected]. He is the author of Making Sense of Heritability (Cambridge University Press, 2005). Rafael De Clercq is associate professor and head of the Department of Visual Studies, and adjunct associate professor of philosophy, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, NT, Hong Kong; [email protected]. The authors thank these individuals for useful comments on earlier drafts: Tomislav Bracanović, Stephen J. Ceci, Andrew Irvine, Paisley Livingston, Darrell Rowbottom, Nosson ben Ruvein, David N. Stamos, Matej Sušnik, Omri Tal, Daniel Wikler, Wendy M. Williams, and Jiji Zhang. None of these people, however, should be assumed to agree with the main claims of this paper. Editor’s Note: This is the complete version of an article with the same title adapted for the Winter 2014 Academic Questions (vol. 27, no. 4) A number of philosophers attribute the underrepresentation of women in philosophy largely to bias against women or some kind of wrongful discrimination. They cite six sources of evidence to support their contention: (1) gender disparities that increase along the path from undergraduate student to full-time faculty member; (2) anecdotal accounts of discrimination in philosophy; (3) research on gender bias in the evaluation of manuscripts, grants, and curricula vitae in other academic disciplines; (4) psychological research on implicit bias; (5) psychological research on stereotype threat; and (6) the relatively small number of articles written from a feminist perspective in leading philosophy journals.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Future, Rethinking the Past. the XVIII Conference, July 19
    Defining the Future, Rethinking the Past. The XVIII conference, July 19-22, 2020 of the International Association of Women Philosophers (IAPh) at Paderborn University, Philosophy Department and the Center for the History of Women Philosophers announces Call for Papers For more than 40 years, the International Association of Women Philosophers (IAPh) has been a decisive organisation in encouraging and promoting women’s research in philosophy and its history. Founded in Germany in the 1970s, it is now a global network for all women who work in philosophy. Given its strong tradition, IAPh covers feminist philosophy as well as the history of women philosophers. The slogan of our conference emphasizes and does justice to the crucial role women have played in shaping and advancing our discipline. Focal themes of IAPh 2020 will be economy, technology, ecology, and the history of philosophy. https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/event/defining-the-future-rethinking-the-past/ We welcome submissions within the following philosophic sub-disciplines: Value Theory including aesthetics and environmentalism, Analytical Philosophy, including philosophy of mind, Philosophy of Religion, Ontology, Metaphysics including Phenomenology, Logic and Philosophy of Science, Value Theory including Ethics and Aesthetics, Social and Political philosophy. 1. Feminist Philosophy of Economics: a. Value Theory b. Micro/Macro Economics c. Political issues of Feminist Economics d. Housekeeping, Mothering, Nurturing & Caregiving e. Food: Ethics & Economics f. Environmental Protection & Sustainability g. History of Feminist Philosophy of Economics 2. Feminist Philosophy of Technology a. Algorithms and Digitization b. Responsibility c. Social Engineering, Genetic modification and Disabled persons d. Robotics and Artificial Intelligence e. New Work/Future Directions f.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Women's Political Thought in Europe, 1400-1700
    This page intentionally left blank A HISTORY OF WOMEN’S POLITICAL THOUGHT IN EUROPE, 1400–1700 This ground-breaking book surveys the history of women’s political thought in Europe, from the late medieval period to the early modern era. The authors examine women’s ideas about topics such as the basis of political authority, the best form of political organisation, justifications of obedience and resistance, and concepts of liberty, toleration, sociability, equality, and self-preservation. Women’s ideas concerning relations between the sexes are discussed in tandem with their broader political outlooks; the authors demonstrate that the development of a distinctively sexual politics is reflected in women’s critiques of marriage, the double standard, and women’s exclusion from government. Women writers are also shown to be indebted to the ancient idea of political virtue, and to be acutely aware of being part of a long tradition of female political commentary. This work will be of tremendous interest to political philosophers, historians of ideas, and feminist scholars alike. jacqueline broad is an Honorary Research Associate in the School of Philosophy and Bioethics at Monash University. She is author of Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century (2002) and co-editor with Karen Green of Virtue, Liberty, and Toleration: Political Ideas of European Women, 1400–1800 (2007). karen green is Associate Professor in the School of Philosophy and Bioethics at Monash University. She is author of Dummett: Philosophy of Language (2001) and The Woman of Reason (1995). A HISTORY OF WOMEN’S POLITICAL THOUGHT IN EUROPE, 1400–1700 JACQUELINE BROAD AND KAREN GREEN Monash University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521888172 © Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green 2009 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy
    Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy EILEEN O’NEILL It has now been more than a dozen years since the Eastern Division of the APA invited me to give an address on what was then a rather innovative topic: the published contributions of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century women to philosophy.1 In that address, I highlighted the work of some sixty early modern women. I then said to the audience, “Why have I presented this somewhat interesting, but nonetheless exhausting . overview of seventeenth- and eigh- teenth-century women philosophers? Quite simply, to overwhelm you with the presence of women in early modern philosophy. It is only in this way that the problem of women’s virtually complete absence in contemporary histories of philosophy becomes pressing, mind-boggling, possibly scandalous.” My presen- tation had attempted to indicate the quantity and scope of women’s published philosophical writing. It had also suggested that an acknowledgment of their contributions was evidenced by the representation of their work in the scholarly journals of the period and by the numerous editions and translations of their texts that continued to appear into the nineteenth century. But what about the status of these women in the histories of philosophy? Had they ever been well represented within the histories written before the twentieth century? In the second part of my address, I noted that in the seventeenth century Gilles Menages, Jean de La Forge, and Marguerite Buffet produced doxogra- phies of women philosophers, and that one of the most widely read histories of philosophy, that by Thomas Stanley, contained a discussion of twenty-four women philosophers of the ancient world.
    [Show full text]
  • Environments of Intelligence
    Environments of Intelligence “An absorbing volume that integrates an extraordinarily wide area of work, with interesting observations and new twists right to the end.” Ruth Millikan, University of Connecticut, USA What is the role of the environment, and of the information it provides, in cognition? More specifically, may there be a role for certain artefacts to play in this context? These are questions that motivate “4E” theories of cognition (as being embodied, embedded, extended, enactive). In his take on that family of views, Hajo Greif first defends and refines a concept of information as primarily natural, environmen- tally embedded in character, which had been eclipsed by information-processing views of cognition. He continues with an inquiry into the cognitive bearing of some artefacts that are sometimes referred to as “intelligent environments”. With- out necessarily having much to do with Artificial Intelligence, such artefacts may ultimately modify our informational environments. With respect to human cognition, the most notable effect of digital computers is not that they might be able, or become able, to think but that they alter the way we perceive, think and act. Hajo Greif teaches at the Munich Center for Technology in Society (MCTS), Technical University of Munich, Germany, and the Department of Philosophy, University of Klagenfurt, Austria. His research interests cover the philosophy – and some of the history and the social studies – of science and technology, as well as the philosophy of mind. History and Philosophy of Technoscience Series Editor: Alfred Nordmann For a full list of titles in this series, please visit www.routledge.com 1 Error and Uncertainty in Scientific Practice Marcel Boumans, Giora Hon and Arthur C.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PAUL SCOTT, University of Kansas
    THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY PAUL SCOTT, University of Kansas 1. GENERAL Orientalism and discussions of identity and alterity form part of an identifiable trend in our field during the coverage of the two calendar years. Another strong current is the concept of libertinage and its literary and social influence. In terms of the first direction, Nicholas Dew, Orientalism in Louis XlV's France, OUP, 2009, xv+301 pp., publishes an overview of what he terms 'baroque Orientalism' and explores the topos through chapters devoted to the production of texts by d'Herbelot, Bernier, and Thevenot which would have an important reception and influence during the 18th century. The network of the Republic of Letters was crucial in gaining access to and studying oriental works and, while this was a marginal presence during the period, D. reveals how the curiosity of vth-c. scholars would lay the foundations of work that would be drawn on by the philosophes. Duprat, Orient, is an apt complement to Dew's volume, and A. Duprat, 'Le fil et la trame. Motifs orientaux dans les litteratures d'Europe' (9-17) maintains that the depiction of the Orient in European lit. was a common attempt to express certain desires but, at the same time, to contain a general angst as a result of incorporating scientific progress and territorial expansion. Brian Brazeau, Writing a New France, 1604-1632: Empire and Early Modern French Identity, Farnham, Ashgate, 2009, x +132 pp., selects the period following the end of the Wars of Religion because this early period of colonization gave rise to some of the most enthusiastic accounts as well as the fact that they established the pioneering debate for future narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • On Philosophical Style Virpi Lehtinen
    On Philosophical Style Virpi Lehtinen To cite this version: Virpi Lehtinen. On Philosophical Style. European Journal of Women’s Studies, SAGE Publications (UK and US), 2007, 14 (2), pp.109-125. 10.1177/1350506807075817. hal-00571300 HAL Id: hal-00571300 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571300 Submitted on 1 Mar 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. On Philosophical Style Michèle Le Dœuff and Luce Irigaray Virpi Lehtinen UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI ABSTRACT Irigaray and Le Dœuff diagnose the problem of woman and philosophy in terms of love. The differing solutions to the problem can be found in their styles. Irigaray’s style is loving and dialogic, transforming the inherent structure of love and reminding us of the traditional feminine position defined by men. Le Dœuff’s style is critical and pluralistic and relates to her perception of the feminine way of philosophical writing. These styles take into account the undervaluation of the feminine in the apparently ‘neutral’ practices of philosophizing and surpass the traditional or unreflected notions of the feminine style. Ultimately, the con- sciously ‘subjective’ styles, with the inherent aims of self-reflectivity and openness for other persons and texts, prove necessary when striving for truth and objectiv- ity.
    [Show full text]