DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Bioscience – Fish Community And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northern Bioscience – Fish Community And Thunder Bay North Harbour Fish Community and Habitat Synthesis December 21, 2012 Prepared for: Environment Canada Prepared by: Dr. Robert F. Foster Thunder Bay North Harbour Fish Community and Habitat Synthesis Executive Summary Existing fisheries and habitat reports, mapping, underwater video, and geospatial data were reviewed for the Thunder Bay North Harbour Area of Concern on Lake Superior near the community of Thunder Bay, Ontario. This review provides supporting documentation that will be used to identify appropriate mitigation for the Contaminated Sediment Management Area (CSMA) adjacent to the Cascades Fine Paper mill. A list of 55 species of fish that have been confirmed from the Thunder Bay Harbour and adjacent Lake Superior and tributaries was compiled, including 43 that have been confirmed in the Thunder Bay North Harbour (TBNH) study area from the mouth of the Current River north to the Cascade Fine Paper mill. Additional undocumented species may use TBNH study area given the relatively limited fisheries assessment that has been conducted there and the fact that 89 fish species are known to occur within the Lake Superior basin. Underwater video and sediment ponar grabs indicate that the TBNH study area is comprised of soft sediments, primarily fine sands and silts, with some clay. Coarser sands, limited patches of cobble, and some rip rap are found in a narrow nearshore band along the shoreline, but represents a small fraction of the TBNH study area (likely <5%). Available data indicate that gravel, cobble, and other coarse substrates are predominately limited to the Far‐field area, away from the CSMA. The substrate of the CSMA is predominately pulp fibre of over 1 m depth near the shoreline, with thinner deposits farther out. Approximately 29 ha of the TBNH study area have sparse to dense aquatic macrophytes dominated by the Canada waterweed, with some water milfoil and pondweeds. There are no submergents immediately adjacent to the Cascades mill where pulp depth is greater than 1 m, but the outer portion of the CSMA has dense beds of submergents, perhaps in response to increased nutrient availability. Available video footage suggest that submergents are sparser farther afield from the mill, with 70% of submergents in the TBNH study area on silt substrates in 2‐5 m water depth. The CSMA likely provides spawning habitat for yellow perch and small fish species that have adhesive eggs and may spawn over submergents (e.g., sticklebacks); unvegetated deep pulp deposits within the CSMA are less likely to be suitable spawning habitat. The CSMA appears to provide nursery habitat for young‐of‐the‐year (YOY) and/or juvenile longnose sucker, white sucker, and walleye that spawn in the nearby Current River. In particular, the CSMA could potentially provide important nursery habitat for a Thunder Bay Area of Concern walleye population, which is part of a Great Lakes rehabilitation effort. The CSMA also provides nursery habitat for yellow perch and small fish species such as spottail shiners, ninespine sticklebacks Northern Bioscience ii Thunder Bay North Harbour Fish Community and Habitat Synthesis and sculpins that spawn in or near the CSMA. These submergents support invertebrates that are prey for YOY and adult fish, and provide cover for fish of all ages. The CSMA also provides habitat for adult walleye, longnose and white suckers, northern pike, and yellow perch, as well as for a number of cyprinid and other small fish species. The significance of the CSMA as fish habitat is difficult to determine given the limited data for the CSMA and the surrounding TBNH. However, no fish surveys have been conducted in the CSMA since mill closure in 2009, and this may affect fish use in the area if they had formerly been attracted to the warmer water temperatures at the outfall. Additional fish and habitat surveys (e.g., submergents) are recommended to provide a more complete understanding of the significance of the CSMA relative to fish habitat elsewhere in the TBNH study area. The remediation of area without submerged aquatic vegetation could potentially ameliorate its value as fish habitat. Cover Photo: Thunder Bay North Harbour from near Port Arthur Shipyards (GoogleMap image) Northern Bioscience iii Thunder Bay North Harbour Fish Community and Habitat Synthesis Contents Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................ii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................... v List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... vi List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Thunder Bay Area of Concern ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Current Study ......................................................................................................... 2 2 Aquatic Environment .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Water Depth ................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Exposure / Fetch / Currents .......................................................................................... 6 2.3 Water Clarity and Quality ............................................................................................. 7 2.4 Substrate ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.4.1 Near‐field (CSMA) ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4.2 Mid‐field .................................................................................................................. 13 2.4.3 Far‐field ................................................................................................................... 15 2.5 Contaminants ............................................................................................................. 17 2.5.1 Benthic Invertebrates ............................................................................................. 17 2.5.2 Impacts on Fish ....................................................................................................... 19 2.6 Aquatic Vegetation ..................................................................................................... 23 2.6.1 Distribution and Abundance ................................................................................... 23 2.6.2 Species Composition ............................................................................................... 24 3 Fish Community .................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Species at Risk ............................................................................................................. 33 4 Fish Habitat ........................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Spawning Habitat........................................................................................................ 34 4.1.1 Yellow Perch ............................................................................................................ 35 4.1.2 Northern Pike .......................................................................................................... 35 4.1.3 Lake Trout ............................................................................................................... 35 4.1.4 Lake Whitefish and Lake Herring ............................................................................ 36 4.1.5 River‐Spawning Species .......................................................................................... 36 4.1.6 Other Fish Species ................................................................................................... 37 4.2 Nursery Habitat .......................................................................................................... 37 4.3 Adult Habitat .............................................................................................................. 38 4.4 Summary of Fish Habitat ............................................................................................ 44 5 Assessment of Significance of Fish Habitat .......................................................................... 46 6 Data Gaps and Recommendations ....................................................................................... 52 7 Literature Cited ..................................................................................................................... 53 Northern Bioscience iv Thunder Bay North Harbour Fish Community and Habitat Synthesis List of Figures Figure 1. Map of Thunder Bay Harbour Area of Concern. ............................................................. 1 Figure 2. Detail of Thunder Bay North Harbour study area and Contaminated Sediment Management Area ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Current River Fish Habitat Assessment Final.Pdf
    2011 Current River Fish Habitat Assessment December 1, 2011 Prepared for: Thunder Bay District Stewardship Council & Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Thunder Bay, ON Prepared by: Dr. Robert F. Foster 2011 Current River Assessment ABSTRACT Fish habitat mapping and electrofishing was conducted between August 31 and September 23, 2011 on the Current River below the Boulevard Lake dam and its mouth at Lake Superior. A total of 1063 fish of 10 species were caught during 10,976 seconds of electrofishing. Large fish species included one adult and five young of the year (YOY) walleye, 63 rainbow trout, 3 brook trout, and 32 YOY white sucker. Bedrock substrate comprises approximately 71% of the approximately 47,500 m2 of channel habitat, with cobble comprising much of the rest, particularly in middle reaches near Cumberland Street. During the drought conditions observed during the survey, only 44% of the channel below the high water mark was wetted. Although pool habitats represent only about 35% of the wetted habitat at low flows, they provide significant fish habitat. In particular, the bedrock pools above the generating station encompass approximately about 2000 m2 or 8% of the total channel area above the GS, but contained 477 fish of eight species. These fish habitat values have implications for water management planning, particularly minimum flows requirements in the bypass reach and its relation to leakage flows. Cover photo: Current River below Boulevard Lake Dam on September 2011 2 2011 Current River Assessment 1 INTRODUCTION Several potential fish habitat issues have been identified for the lower reaches of the Current River between Boulevard Lake and Lake Superior including: stranding of anadromous fish e.g., rainbow trout in or below the fish ladder below the Boulevard Lake Dam; potentially poor recruitment of walleye due to limited spawning success poor spawning runs of rainbow smelt due to inappropriate flow regimes; and other potential, unidentified impacts on spawning and nursery habitat for native fish species (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Lake Superior in 2005
    THE STATE OF LAKE SUPERIOR IN 2005 SPECIAL PUBLICATION 10-01 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures which will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes. The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes the Technical Report Series, intended for peer-reviewed scientific literature; Special Publications, designed primarily for dissemination of reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and other (non-serial) publications. Technical Reports are most suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission's program. Special Publications, being working documents, may evolve with the findings of and charges to a particular committee. Both publications follow the style of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Sponsorship of Technical Reports or Special Publications does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions contained therein are endorsed by the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District, Ontario
    Thunder Bay Field Naturalists Checklist of Fish es of Thunder Bay District , Ontario 31 December 2019 Introduction This first edition of Checklist of Fishes of Thunder Bay District adds to existing checklists prepared by members of the Thunder Bay Field Naturalists (TBFN) covering other vertebrate taxa (mammals, birds, reptiles & amphibians), as well vascular plants, butterflies, and odonates. As with these other checklists, it covers the official judicial District of Thunder Bay (Figure 1). The District extends from the eastern border of Quetico Provincial Park east to White River, and from the international border north to Lake St. Joseph and the Albany River. Much of the District (60%) is within the Great Lakes watershed, with the remaining draining into the Arctic Ocean either north via the Hudson Bay Lowlands, or west via Rainy Lake/Lake of the Woods and the Nelson River watershed. Figure 1. Judicial District of Thunder Bay with primary watersheds and protected areas. 2 The fish species of the Thunder Bay District mostly reflect post-glacial colonization, modified by more recent ecological and anthropogenic influences. The Wisconsinan ice mass began to retreat north of Lake Superior circa 10,700 BP (Farrand and Drexler 1985), allowing fish to initially colonize the Thunder Bay area (Momot and Stephenson 1996). The Marquette advance circa 9900 BP likely wiped out these early colonizers, but its retreat around 9700 BP allowed many species access from glacial refugia in the Mississippi River basin to the south (Mandrak and Crossman 1992b; Stephenson and Momot 1994). Some species invaded from the east via the outlet of Lake Minong and Lake Superiors’ other post-glacial predecessors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Development on the Current River
    Thunder Bay Native Fisheries Rehabilitation — Chronology of Development on the Current River Upper Great Lakes Management Unit – Lake Superior Miscellaneous Report 11-01 Revision 4 (August 2012) CHRONOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT on the CURRENT RIVER AUTHOR Steven M. Bobrowicz Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Upper Great Lakes Management Unit, Lake Superior. 435 James Street South, Suite 221e, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, P7E 6S8 [email protected] Phone: (807) 475-1374 Cover image: Current River Falls, near Port Arthur, Ont. (postcard, c. 1910) DRAFT CITATION: Bobrowicz, S.M. 2011. Thunder Bay Native Fisheries Rehabilitation — Chronology of Development on the Current River. Upper Great Lakes Management Unit Miscellaneous Report 11-01. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, ON. 51 pp. 1 CHRONOLOGY OF DEVELOPMENT on the CURRENT RIVER INTRODUCTION The Current River (fr. Riviere aux Courants) is a large tributary which flows from its headwaters at Current Lake (N48o 37’ W89o 11’) 63 kilometres to Lake Superior at Thunder Bay, in the north end of the City of Thunder Bay (formerly Port Arthur). The river is characterized by a high gradient and numerous rapids, particularly in its lower reach; notwithstanding the current reservoir at Boulevard Lake (N48o 27’ W89o 11’) the final 10 kilometres of the Current River comprise a continuous set of falls and rapids culminating in Current River Falls, a 12m vertical drop over the final 650m of the river. Most of this area is currently protected through a series of municipal parks and conservation areas. Upstream of the Cascades Conservation Area (N48o 30’ W89o 13’), development along the river corridor includes residential properties, forest harvesting, and a large aggregate quarry; despite this, the upper reach of the Current River remains in a near-natural state.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 ANNUAL REPORT a Double-Crested Cormorant at Mission Island Marsh Conservation Area
    LAKEHEAD REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 2019 ANNUAL REPORT A Double-crested Cormorant at Mission Island Marsh Conservation Area. VISION MISSION A healthy, safe and sustainable Lakehead To lead the conservation and protection Watershed for future generations. of the Lakehead Watershed. Hazelwood Lake Conservation Area Message from Tammy Cook, LRCA CAO BOARD STAFF Over the past year the LRCA has made great strides towards achieving the initiatives set out in the Authority’s Strategic Plan. The MEMBERS MEMBERS completion of the McVicar Creek Watershed Floodplain Mapping Update project, Kaministiquia River Erosion Sites Inventory Update and wetland evaluations in the Neebing and Mosquito Creek watersheds will assist in safeguarding people and property 11Donna Blunt, Chair Municipality of Shuniah Tammy Cook Chief Administrative O!cer13 from the perils of !ooding and erosion. The "rst step in protecting people and property from natural hazards is knowing where Grant Arnold, Vice-Chair Township of Conmee Gail Willis Watershed Manager the hazards exist. Additionally, completed major maintenance dredging on the Neebing-McIntyre Floodway in 2019 will ensure Ed Chambers Township of Dorion Mark Ambrose Finance Manager that the Intercity area and Lower Neebing River residents continue to be protected from !ooding up to the magnitude of the Rudy Buitenhuis Township of Gillies Ryne Gilliam Lands Manager Regional Storm. Erwin Butikofer Municipality of Neebing Ryan Mackett Communications Manager Jim Vezina Township of O’Connor Melanie O’Riley Administrative Clerk/Receptionist Our continued commitment towards a robust health and safety program and transparency lead to the creation of additional Allan Vis Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge Gayle Little Finance Administrative Assistant Andrew Foulds City of Thunder Bay Roman Augustyn Information Systems Coordinator policies and training for all sta#.
    [Show full text]
  • FWFN Aboriginal Background Information Report – Dog River
    Fort William First Nation Aboriginal Background Information Report Dog River Matawan Forests Prepared for Ministry of Natural Resources Prepared by: Fort William First Nation March 1, 2018 Page 1 of 18 Fort William First Nation – First Nation Background Information Report Fort William First Nation Background Information Report INTRODUCTION The following Fort William First Nation (FWFN) Background Information Report is intended to provide a summary of the FWFN community’s past and current resource use from the Forest. The report is intended to provide the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forests (MNRF), with an overview of the FWFN, and its connection to the Dog-River Matawin Forest, and the interests and any concerns of the community over forest management and forestry activities. Fort William First Nation authorizes the inclusion of this report with the Dog-River Matawan Forest Management Plan. FWFN Organization & Contact Information The community is represented by an elected Council consisting of the following persons: Chief: Peter Collins Counsellors: Leo Bannon Sr., Leo Bannon Jr., Dwight Boucher, Valerie Chapman, Jennelle Charlie, Anthony Collins, Michele Solomon, Sherry Pelletier, Phil Pelletier, Kyle Maclaurin Band Office: 90 Anemki Drive – Suite 200 Thunder Bay, Ontario P7J 1L3 (807) 623-9543 Planning Team Member: Elizabeth Esquega, Consultation Liaison Officer BACKGROUND In 2017 MNRF and FWFN entered into a new Service Agreement to update the Dog River - Matawan and Lakehead Forest background information reports. The purpose of the project was to support FWFN to undertake a cultural value mapping project to assist in the identification of community values that could be affected by forestry activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Description
    2.0 Watershed Description Watershed Characterization Map # 1 – Source Water Protection Region Map Binder – Map Sleeve #1 This map illustrates the jurisdictional boundary of the Lakehead Region Conservation Authority and the scientific watershed boundary of Lakehead Source Protection Area as regulated under the “Clean Water Act, 2006”. 2.1 Stakeholders and Partners 2.1.1 Municipalities Since the mid- 1990's, expansion of urban areas, changes in responsibilities of local government and provincial government initiatives have led to a wave of Municipal mergers. The changes saw some counties and regional Municipalities merge with their constituent local Municipalities. As a result, the number of Municipalities in Ontario was reduced by more than 40 per cent between 1996 and 2004, from 815 to 445. In June 1997, the Township of Paipoonge and the Township of Oliver were amalgamated into the Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge. By January of 1999, the amalgamation of Neebing Township with the surrounding unorganized Townships of Pearson and Scoble was complete, creating the Municipality of Neebing which also includes the Geographic Townships of Pardee, Crooks and Blake. The Lakehead Rural Planning Board The Lakehead Rural Planning Board is a regional planning board whose jurisdictional area is defined by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. The Planning Board's membership includes both Municipal and unincorporated area representation. The Board is the approval authority for land severance and plans of subdivision for the Municipalities of Oliver Paipoonge and Neebing, Townships of Conmee, O'Connor, and Gillies and the Unincorporated Townships of Gorham, Ware and the portion of the Dawson Road Lots located east of the Kaministiquia River.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Venice Lake Nicholson Lake Springlet Creek Wolf River Healey Lake Coughlin Furcate Creek Stewart Lake Edmondson Lake McLeod Lake Eaglehead River Mott Lake Brophy Lake Distribution of Fish Wolf River Wolf Lake Greer CreeGkreer Lake Brophy Creek Greenwich Creek Little Greer Lake Shale Lake Spruce River Ada Lake Thompson LakReaymore Lake McGaughey Creek Scarp LakMe oonshine Lake Smiley Lake Astrop Creek Species at Risk McGaughey Lake Golden Gate Lake ¤£582 Little Hicky Lake Trans-Canada Highway Black Sturgeon River Pocket Lake Hicky Creek Cavern Creek Morrow Creek Big Squaw Creek Lakehead Region Wolf Lake Hurkett Little Squaw Creek McWhinney Lake Conservation Authority Hicky Lake Cranberry Bay Keelor Creek (Map 1 of 2) Hurkett Cove Bishops Lake MacDonalds Lake Pace Creek Keelor Lake Pace Lake Greenwich Creek Spereman Creek Cavern Lake Wolf River Delaney Island Greenwich Lake Spereman Lake Innes Lake Astrop Creek Lasseter Lake Coldwater Creek Astrop Lake Black Bay Wiggins Lake Miner Lake East Dog Lake Coldwater Creek Harris Lake Dorion Hicks Lake Ouimet Canyon Bat Lake East Dog River Furcate Creek Macauley Lake Fall Lake Burbidge Lake Welburn Lake Dorion Landing Gulch Creek East Dog River Goodmorning Lakes Scimming Island Gulch Lake East Dog River Furcate Lake Spereman Creek Bloxham Creek Billy Lake Shallownest Lake Jig Creek Yorky Lake Crow Lake McLeish Lake Hicks Lake Spoon Lake Current River Himdick Creek Jig Lake Spoon Creek Coldwater Creek Steepledge Lake Himdick Lake Teardrop Lake Current Lake MacIntosh Creek Ouimet Greenwich
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Northern Highways Program In
    Program Start Year Region Highway Location Type Of Work Highway Target Project Estimated Engineering Delivery Type Program Completion Length Cost Range Status Method Status (km) Expansion 2016 Northeastern 69 North of Hwy 522 northerly, French River Two to four-lane widening Underway 2022 14.8 Over $80M Design Design-Bid- Complete Build Expansion 2023-2024 Northeastern 69 North of Hwy 559, northerly, Nobel Two to four-lane widening Planned 11 Over $80M Design In Design-Bid- Procurement Build Expansion 2023-2024 Northeastern 69 North of the north junction of Hwy 529, Two to four-lane widening Planned 20.4 Over $80M Design Design-Build northerly, Britt Underway Expansion Upcoming Northeastern 69 Patrol yard on Hwy 529 interchange, New facility Planned 0 $8 – $20M Design Design-Build expansion Pointe Au Baril Upcoming Expansion Upcoming Northeastern 69 Hwy 69 connection to Sudbury southeast Two to four-lane widening Planned 6.2 Over $80M Design Design-Bid- expansion bypass Upcoming Build Expansion Upcoming Northeastern 69 South junction of Hwy 529 northerly, Two to four-lane widening, New bridge, Planned 15 Over $80M Design Design-Bid- expansion Pointe au Baril New culvert Upcoming Build Expansion Upcoming Northeastern 652 Cochrane Bypass, extension of Hwy 652, New two-lane highway Planned 4.5 $15 – $50M Planning/EA In Design-Bid- expansion Genier Rd. to Hwy 11 for 4.5 km, Procurement Build Cochrane Expansion Upcoming Northeastern 69 North Hwy 7182 (Shebeshegong Rd.), Two to four-lane widening Planned 11 Over $80M Design Design-Bid- expansion northerly, Pointe au Baril Upcoming Build Expansion 2020 Northwestern 11, 17 3 km west of CPR overhead at Ouimet to Two to four-lane widening, New bridge, Underway 2023 8.7 $40 – $100M Design Design-Bid- Dorion East Loop Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Fish Popula'ons and Their Habitat in the Thunder Bay Area Of
    The status of fish populaons and their habitat in the Thunder Bay Area of Concern Thunder Bay Area of Concern (AOC) • Designated AOC in 1986 • Stage 1 (defini.on of problem) completed in 1991 • Stage 2 (remedial strategies) completed in 2004 General issues: • unpleasant foam, oily residue and odour in waterways • high levels of chemicals in sediment and fish • loss of fish and wildlife habitat • impacts to sediment-dwelling organisms • impacts on fish populaons Fish Habitat Issues • Water Quality degradaon – Direct municipal/industrial discharge – Non-point source (agriculture, stormwater) • Loss of wetlands – Industrial, urban, coUage waterfront development • Loss/degradaon of substrate – e.g., Northern Wood Preservers; Thunder Bay North Harbour • Dredging – Navigaonal channels altered habitat significantly – Deposi.on of spoils in early years affected fish spawning sites Fish Populaon Issues • Habitat loss – Physical • wetland areas (spawning/nursery) • substrate – Chemical • Kaminis.Quia River water Quality barrier • pollutants (municipal/industrial) • chemical lampricide use • Over-exploitaon – Commercial • past (lake whitefish, lake trout) – Recreaonal • current (walleye)? • Invasive aquac species – 15 of 55 fish species in Thunder Bay AOC non-nave – great poten.al for others • shipping ballast water • warm Kaminis.Quia River delta Remediaon Stage 2 Projects (1 of 3) Project Code Project Title Status Proponent Cost Recommendation 1-1: Increase the extent of productive aquatic and terrestrial habitat by rehabilitating and protecting wetland and riparian environments, and by enforcing existing environmental legislation. Rehabilitation of Degraded Walleye Spawning Construction completed December 1991; assessment of EC/GLCUF, OMNR, OMOE, and $37,500 for construction, and $42,000 for FWH-1 Habitat at the Current River Estuary adult walleye abundance ongoing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaministiquia River
    Reacquaint the Waters of History The Kaministiquia River By Sarah C.R. Mitchell A practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture Department of Landscape Architecture Faculty of Architecture University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB Copyright © 2014 by Sarah C.R. Mitchell Dedicated to my parents, Dan & Linda, without whom this would have been impossible Above: At Kakabeka Falls during spring flooding,photograph by Heidi Mitchell, 2012 Cover Photo of this Document: View across Lake Superior towards the Sleeping Giant from Mission Island at the Kaministiquia River Delta ii Cover Photo on Album Case: View of the Kaministiquia Delta and the Nor’Westers from the air, photograph by Ben Mitchell, 2013 Abstract The modern interaction we have with the natural environment surrounding our cities is often limited to designated areas that usually contain manicured trails and other well-signed features. When information is very limited or absent we often avoid exploring such areas and instead opt for others both familiar and easily accessible. Mapping as a means to engage a community is a method that encourages exploration and discovery. Often there are hidden treasures of our communities’ backyards that have nearly been lost to time and memory. The opportunities and experiences that such places can offer are too rich to be lost forever. This practicum is an attempt to reconnect and engage residents and visitors of Thunder Bay, Ontario, with the historically significant Kaministiquia River. It focuses on the Kaministiquia from Kakabeka Falls to Lake Superior.
    [Show full text]