DOCSLIB.ORG

Khovanov Homology Detects Split Links Robert Lipshitz1 Joint Work with Sucharit Sarkar Arxiv:1910.04246

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Khovanov Homology Detects Split Links Robert Lipshitz1 Joint Work with Sucharit Sarkar Arxiv:1910.04246 Khovanov Homology Detects Split Links Robert Lipshitz1 Joint work with Sucharit Sarkar arXiv:1910.04246 This research was supported by NSF Grant DMS-1810893. Outline • History, statement of main theorem • Overview of proof. • Background on �"-modules. • The basepoint action on Khovanov homology. • Twisted coefficients and action of the exterior algebra on Heegaard Floer homology Khovanov homology detects… Khovanov homology detects… • [Grigsby-Wehrli, ’08] dim �ℎ (� − • [Batson-Seed, ’13] g dim �ℎ(�) ����� �� �) detects the unknot ∀ � > 1. detects the unlink. • [Hedden, ’08] dim �ℎ(2 − ����� �� �) • [Baldwin-Sivek, ’18] �ℎ(�; ℤ) detects the unknot. detects the trefoils. • [Kronheimer-Mrowka, ’10] • [Baldwin-Sivek-Xie, ’18] dim �ℎ(�) detects the unknot. g dim �ℎ(�; �:) detects the Hopf link. • [Hedden-Ni, ’10] g dim �ℎ(�) detects • [Xie-B. Zhang, ’19] dim �ℎ(�; �:) the 2-component unlink. detects forests of Hopf links and unknots. • [Hedden-Ni, ’12] �ℎ(�) as a module • [J. Wang, ’20] dim �ℎ(�; �:) detects : : over �: �<, … , �ℓ /(�< , … , �ℓ ) detects the trivial band sums �<∐�: of split links, among unlink. all band sums of �<∐�:. Near-universal strategy: exploit a spectral sequence to a more geometric invariant (Heegaard / monopole Floer homology or instanton Floer homology) Khovanov homology [also] detects…split links. • Given a link �, �, � ∈ �, can • form reduced Khovanov homology �ℎG (�) using the basepoint � : • which is a module over R = �: � /(� ) using the basepoint �. • Theorem.[L-Sarkar, ’19] Given a link � and points �, � ∈ �, there is a 2-sphere in �K ∖ � separating � and � if and only if �ℎG (�) is a free : R = �: � /(� )-module. • (For the rest of the talk, everything is with �:-coefficients.) Equivalent conditions to the main theorem • Call a chain complex �∗ over � quasi-free if �∗ is quasi-isomorphic to a bounded chain complex of free �-modules. : • An obstruction to quasi-freeness over R = �: � /(� ): is total complex of R R R R ⋯ ← �∗ ← �∗ ← �∗ ← ⋯ acyclic? Call the homology of this the unrolled homology. • Theorem.[L-Sarkar] For �, � ∈ �, the following are equivalent: 1. There is a 2-sphere separating � and �. 2. �ℎG (�) is a free �-module. 3. �STU(�) is quasi-free. 4. The unrolled homology of �STU(�) is trivial. Overview of the proof TFAE: 1. There is a 2-sphere separating � and �. 2. �ℎG (�) is a free �-module. Ingredients 3. �STU(�) is quasi-free. 4. The unrolled homology of �STU(�) is trivial. • Freeness. [Shumakovitch ’03] �ℎ(�) (unreduced) is a free R = : �: � /(� )-module. • Also follows from an argument in odd Khovanov homology (Ozsváth-Rasmussen- Szabó). TU • Basepoint independence. Up to quasi-isomorphism over �, �S (�) Sarkar, depends only on � and which components contain �, �. Hedden-Ni + � • Spectral sequence �ℎG � ⇒ . The Ozsváth-Szabó spectral sequence Ozsváth-Szabó, ��W Σ � respects the (�") �-module structure. Hedden-Ni + � • Unrolled ��W . The unrolled homology of ��W � is isomorphic to the Novikov twisted Heegaard Floer homology ��W �; Λ] . : • Sphere detection. ��W �; Λ] detects homologically essential � s. Ni, Hedden-Ni, : : Alishahi-L Specifically, ��W �; Λ] = 0 if and only if there is an � with �, � ≠ 0. TFAE: 1. There is a 2-sphere separating � and �. 2. �ℎG (�) is a free �-module. Steps 3. �STU(�) is quasi-free. 4. The unrolled homology of �STU(�) is trivial. • 1 ⇒ 2, 1 ⇒ 3: For a split diagram, immediate from freeness of �ℎ(�) and Künneth theorem. For a general diagram, follows from basepoint independence. • 2 ⇒ 4, 3 ⇒ 4: Algebra: • Can compute unrolled homology from �"-module structure on �ℎG (�). R R R R • Consider the filtration on ⋯ ← �∗ ← �∗ ← �∗ ← ⋯ from grading on �∗. • 4 ⇒ 1: • Spectral sequence: Unrolled homology of �STU(�) trivial implies unrolled homology of ��W Σ � trivial. • Unrolled homology: this is equivalent to ��W Σ(�); Λ] = 0. • Sphere detection: this is equivalent to existence of a splitting sphere. �" background �"-module basics • An �"-module over � is a (graded) vector space � and maps ⊗g �<fg: � ⊗ � → � satisfying some compatibility conditions. : • For R = �: � /(� ) (and � strictly unital) these are maps �<fg ⋅, �, ⋯ , � : � → � l �<fm ∘ �<fn = 0 mfnog • The operation �< is a differential on �. • A chain complex of �-modules gives an �"-module with �<fg = 0 for � > 1. �"-module basics • Homological Perturbation Lemma. Given an �"-module �, a chain complex �, and a chain homotopy equivalence � ≃ � over �: there is an induced �"-module structure on � so that � and � are homotopy equivalent �"-modules. • In particular, homology of any chain complex of �-modules is an �"- module. • Derived category is the �" homotopy category. Given chain complexes of �-modules � and �, � and � are quasi- isomorphic chain complexes of �-modules if and only if they are homotopy equivalent as �"-modules. 1. There is a 2-sphere separating � and �. 2. �ℎG (�) is a free �-module. 3. �STU(�) is quasi-free. Unrolled complex of an �"-module 4. The unrolled homology of �STU(�) is trivial. u< • The unrolled complex of � is � ⊗�s �:[� , �]] with differential m mfg � � ⊗ � = l �<fg �, �, … , � � . g �{ �{ �z �z �K �K �K �K � � � � � ⋯ : � : � : � : � : ⋯ �< �< �< �< • Clearly invariant under �" homotopy equivalence. So, by homological perturbation lemma, unrolled complex of �ℎG (�) and �STU(�) agree. • 2 ⇒ 4 obvious. 3 ⇒ 4 follows by filtering by grading on �. The basepoint action on Khovanov homology Invariance of the module structure. • Fix points �, � ∈ �. Endows �TU(�) with structure of a : : : : �: � ⁄(� ) , �: � ⁄(� ) -bimodule (or �: �, � ⁄(� , � )-module). • Theorem. [Hedden-Ni; LS] Up to quasi-isomorphism, the differential bimodule �TU(�) depends only on the components containing �, �. • Corollary. Up to quasi-isomorphism, the module structure on �STU(�) and �"-module structure on �ℎ(�) and �ℎG (�) depend only on the components containing �, �. • To prove the theorem, it suffices to construct an �" homotopy equivalence (or quasi-isomorphism) associated to moving a basepoint through a crossing. 20 ROBERT LIPSHITZ AND SUCHARIT SARKAR 1 1 ⌦ p 1 1 X • ⌦ Kh = X 1 C ! ⌦ X X X •q ⌦ f p q 1 1 1 ⌦ • • = 1 X Kh ⌦ C ! X X 1 ⌦ X X ⌦ Figure 4.1. Example of the map f. The solid arrows are the di↵erential, the dashed arrows are the action of W ,thedotted arrows are the action of X, the double arrows are the map f0,1,0,andthedashed double arrows are the map f0,1,1( ,X). The A relations correspond to certain ways of getting from 20 ROBERT LIPSHITZ AND SUCHARIT SARKAR one vertex· to another in1 two steps. 1 1 1 1 ⌦ ⌦ p p 1 1 X 1 X 1 • ⌦ • ⌦ Kh = X 1 Kh = X 1 C ! ⌦ C ! ⌦ X X X X X X •q ⌦ •q ⌦ f f p q 1 1 1 p q 1 1 1 ⌦ ⌦ • • • • = 1 X = 1 X Kh ⌦ Kh ⌦ C ! C ! X X 1 X 1 X ⌦ ⌦ X X X X ⌦ ⌦ Figure 4.1. Example of the map f. The solid arrows are the di↵erential, Figure 4.2. A second example of the map f. Notation is the same as in Figure 4.1. the dashed arrows are the action of W ,thedotted arrows are the action of X, the double arrows are the map f0,1,0,andthedashed double arrows are the map f0,1,1( ,X). The A relations correspond to certain ways of getting from one vertex· to another in1 two steps. 1 1 Solid: differential. Dashed:⌦ �:(�,⋅). Dotted: �:(⋅, �). Double: �~,<,~. Double-dashed: �~,<,< ⋅, � . p 1 X 1 • ⌦ Kh = X 1 C ! ⌦ X X X •q ⌦ f p q 1 1 1 ⌦ • • = 1 X Kh ⌦ C ! X 1 X ⌦ X X ⌦ Figure 4.2. A second example of the map f. Notation is the same as in Figure 4.1. Module structures on Heegaard Floer homology A tale of two twistings K • Fix � , homomorphism �: �: � → ℤ. • Ozsváth-Szabó construct: ∗ : ∗ • An action of Λ �: = �: � /(� ) on (untwisted) ��W (�). (More generally, a Λ (�< (�)/����)-action.) u< u< • Twisted ��W (�; Λ]), a module over �: � , � or �: � , �] : : • Ni, Hedden-Ni, Alishahi-L: ��W (�; Λ]) vanishes if and only if � has an � with � � ≠ 0. W : • Hedden-Ni, LS: The spectral sequence �ℎ � ⇒ ��W Σ � respects the �: � /(� )-action. • ��W � s ��W �; Λ ƒ„ Goal: relate �s R /(R ) and ] �s ‚ ,‚] . • (cf. earlier work of Sarkar, work of Zemke.) The �</�������-action � � = 2� = 0 � � = 0 • Differential on ��W (Σ, �, �, �): �� = l l #ℳ � � ‰ Š∈‹s(Œ,‰) g• Š o~ Ž Š o< � • Action of � ∈ �<(�): � ⋅ � = l l #ℳ � (� ⋅ �”�)� ‰ Š∈‹s(Œ,‰) g• Š o~ � ⋅ � = � Ž Š o< y ⋅ � = 0 The �" �</�������-action � � = 2� = 0 � � = 0 • Action of � ∈ �<(�): � ⋅ � = l l #ℳ � (� ⋅ �”�)� ‰ Š∈‹s(Œ,‰) g• Š o~ Ž Š o< � • Equivalently, � ⋅ � counts disks u: 0,1 ×ℝ → ���™ Σ with � 1,0 ∈ �×���™u<(Σ). • At the level of homology, � ⋅ � ⋅ � = 0 by considering 1D moduli space of � with � 1,0 ∈ �, � ⋅ � = � � 1, � ∈ �′ for some � > 0 (�œ a pushoff of �). y ⋅ � = 0 The � � /�������-action " < � � = 2� + 2� = 0 � � = � � � = � • Action of � ∈ � (�): < � � = 0 � ⋅ � = l l #ℳ � (� ⋅ �”�)� ‰ Š∈‹s(Œ,‰) g• Š o~ Ž Š o< • Equivalently, � ⋅ � counts disks u: 0,1 ×ℝ → ���™ Σ ∖ � � with � 1,0 ∈ �×���™u<(Σ). • At the level of homology, � ⋅ � ⋅ � = 0 by considering 1D moduli space of � with � 1,0 ∈ �, � 1, � ∈ �′ for some � > 0 (�œ a pushoff of �). • Define �K(�, �, �) by counting 0D moduli space of this � ⋅ � = � + 2� + � + 2� = � + � form. b ⋅ � = � c ⋅ � = 0 • Define � (�, �, … , �), � > 3, similarly. g d ⋅ � = 0 �K �, �, � = � + 2� + 2� = � �K � � , �, � + � �K �, �, � = 0 + � Twisted coefficient ��W � � = �<� + �~� K � � = 0 • Fix � , homomorphism �: �: � → ℤ. • Choose � ∈ �< Σ with � � = � ⋅ �” � . • Define �� = l l #ℳ � �(¢⋅£¤Š)� . ‰ Š∈‹s(Œ,‰) g• Š o~ � Ž Š o< u< • (This is a module over �: � , � .) • Notice that � = � ¥ . ‚o< � � = 2� = 0 � � = 0 First relation: Hasse derivatives ∑ ∑ (¢⋅£¤Š) • �� = ‰ Š∈‹s(Œ,‰) #ℳ � � � . g• Š o~ Ž
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Khovanov Homology of Rational Tangles
    The Khovanov Homology of Rational Tangles Benjamin Thompson A thesis submitted for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy with Honours in Pure Mathematics of The Australian National University October, 2016 Dedicated to my family. Even though they’ll never read it. “To feel fulfilled, you must first have a goal that needs fulfilling.” Hidetaka Miyazaki, Edge (280) “Sleep is good. And books are better.” (Tyrion) George R. R. Martin, A Clash of Kings “Let’s love ourselves then we can’t fail to make a better situation.” Lauryn Hill, Everything is Everything iv Declaration Except where otherwise stated, this thesis is my own work prepared under the supervision of Scott Morrison. Benjamin Thompson October, 2016 v vi Acknowledgements What a ride. Above all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Scott Morrison. This thesis would not have been written without your unflagging support, sublime feedback and sage advice. My thesis would have likely consisted only of uninspired exposition had you not provided a plethora of interesting potential topics at the start, and its overall polish would have likely diminished had you not kept me on track right to the end. You went above and beyond what I expected from a supervisor, and as a result I’ve had the busiest, but also best, year of my life so far. I must also extend a huge thanks to Tony Licata for working with me throughout the year too; hopefully we can figure out what’s really going on with the bigradings! So many people to thank, so little time. I thank Joan Licata for agreeing to run a Knot Theory course all those years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • On Spectral Sequences from Khovanov Homology 11
    ON SPECTRAL SEQUENCES FROM KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY ANDREW LOBB RAPHAEL ZENTNER Abstract. There are a number of homological knot invariants, each satis- fying an unoriented skein exact sequence, which can be realized as the limit page of a spectral sequence starting at a version of the Khovanov chain com- plex. Compositions of elementary 1-handle movie moves induce a morphism of spectral sequences. These morphisms remain unexploited in the literature, perhaps because there is still an open question concerning the naturality of maps induced by general movies. In this paper we focus on the spectral sequences due to Kronheimer-Mrowka from Khovanov homology to instanton knot Floer homology, and on that due to Ozsv´ath-Szab´oto the Heegaard-Floer homology of the branched double cover. For example, we use the 1-handle morphisms to give new information about the filtrations on the instanton knot Floer homology of the (4; 5)-torus knot, determining these up to an ambiguity in a pair of degrees; to deter- mine the Ozsv´ath-Szab´ospectral sequence for an infinite class of prime knots; and to show that higher differentials of both the Kronheimer-Mrowka and the Ozsv´ath-Szab´ospectral sequences necessarily lower the delta grading for all pretzel knots. 1. Introduction Recent work in the area of the 3-manifold invariants called knot homologies has il- luminated the relationship between Floer-theoretic knot homologies and `quantum' knot homologies. The relationships observed take the form of spectral sequences starting with a quantum invariant and abutting to a Floer invariant. A primary ex- ample is due to Ozsv´athand Szab´o[15] in which a spectral sequence is constructed from Khovanov homology of a knot (with Z=2 coefficients) to the Heegaard-Floer homology of the 3-manifold obtained as double branched cover over the knot.
    [Show full text]
  • Khovanov Homology, Its Definitions and Ramifications
    KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY, ITS DEFINITIONS AND RAMIFICATIONS OLEG VIRO Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden POMI, St. Petersburg, Russia Abstract. Mikhail Khovanov defined, for a diagram of an oriented clas- sical link, a collection of groups labelled by pairs of integers. These groups were constructed as homology groups of certain chain complexes. The Euler characteristics of these complexes are coefficients of the Jones polynomial of the link. The original construction is overloaded with algebraic details. Most of specialists use adaptations of it stripped off the details. The goal of this paper is to overview these adaptations and show how to switch between them. We also discuss a version of Khovanov homology for framed links and suggest a new grading for it. 1. Introduction For a diagram D of an oriented link L, Mikhail Khovanov [7] constructed a collection of groups Hi;j(D) such that X j i i;j K(L)(q) = q (−1) dimQ(H (D) ⊗ Q); i;j where K(L) is a version of the Jones polynomial of L. These groups are constructed as homology groups of certain chain complexes. The Khovanov homology has proved to be a powerful and useful tool in low dimensional topology. Recently Jacob Rasmussen [16] has applied it to problems of estimating the slice genus of knots and links. He defied a knot invariant which gives a low bound for the slice genus and which, for knots with only positive crossings, allowed him to find the exact value of the slice genus. Using this technique, he has found a new proof of Milnor conjecture on the slice genus of toric knots.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Complexity of Problems in 3-Dimensional Topology
    [NoVIKOV 1962] For n > 5, THERE DOES NOT EXIST AN ALGORITHM WHICH solves: n Computational COMPLEXITY ISSPHERE: Given A TRIANGULATED M IS IT n OF PROBLEMS IN HOMEOMORPHIC TO S ? 3-dimensional TOPOLOGY Thm (Geometrization + MANY Results) TherE IS AN ALGORITHM TO DECIDE IF TWO COMPACT 3-mflDS ARE homeomorphic. Nathan DunfiELD University OF ILLINOIS SLIDES at: http://dunfield.info/preprints/ Today: HoW HARD ARE THESE 3-manifold questions? HoW QUICKLY CAN WE SOLVE them? NP: YES ANSWERS HAVE PROOFS THAT CAN BE Decision Problems: YES OR NO answer. CHECKED IN POLYNOMIAL time. k x F pi(x) = 0 SORTED: Given A LIST OF integers, IS IT sorted? SAT: Given ∈ 2 , CAN CHECK ALL IN LINEAR time. SAT: Given p1,... pn F2[x1,..., xk] IS k ∈ x F pi(x) = 0 i UNKNOTTED: A DIAGRAM OF THE UNKNOT WITH THERE ∈ 2 WITH FOR ALL ? 11 c CROSSINGS CAN BE UNKNOTTED IN O(c ) UNKNOTTED: Given A PLANAR DIAGRAM FOR K 3 Reidemeister MOves. [LackENBY 2013] IN S IS K THE unknot? A Mn(Z) INVERTIBLE: Given ∈ DOES IT HAVE AN INVERSE IN Mn(Z)? coNP: No ANSWERS CAN BE CHECKED IN POLYNOMIAL time. UNKNOTTED: Yes, ASSUMING THE GRH P: Decision PROBLEMS WHICH CAN BE SOLVED [KuperberG 2011]. IN POLYNOMIAL TIME IN THE INPUT size. SORTED: O(LENGTH OF LIST) 3.5 1.1 INVERTIBLE: O n log(LARGEST ENTRY) NKNOTTED IS IN . Conj: U P T KNOTGENUS: Given A TRIANGULATION , A KNOT b1 = 0 (1) IS KNOTGENUS IN P WHEN ? K T g Z 0 K ⊂ , AND A ∈ > , DOES BOUND AN ORIENTABLE SURFACE OF GENUS 6 g? IS THE HOMEOMORPHISM PROBLEM FOR [Agol-Hass-W.Thurston 2006] 3-manifolds IN NP? KNOTGENUS IS NP-complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Categorified Invariants and the Braid Group
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 143, Number 7, July 2015, Pages 2801–2814 S 0002-9939(2015)12482-3 Article electronically published on February 26, 2015 CATEGORIFIED INVARIANTS AND THE BRAID GROUP JOHN A. BALDWIN AND J. ELISENDA GRIGSBY (Communicated by Daniel Ruberman) Abstract. We investigate two “categorified” braid conjugacy class invariants, one coming from Khovanov homology and the other from Heegaard Floer ho- mology. We prove that each yields a solution to the word problem but not the conjugacy problem in the braid group. In particular, our proof in the Khovanov case is completely combinatorial. 1. Introduction Recall that the n-strand braid group Bn admits the presentation σiσj = σj σi if |i − j|≥2, Bn = σ1,...,σn−1 , σiσj σi = σjσiσj if |i − j| =1 where σi corresponds to a positive half twist between the ith and (i + 1)st strands. Given a word w in the generators σ1,...,σn−1 and their inverses, we will denote by σ(w) the corresponding braid in Bn. Also, we will write σ ∼ σ if σ and σ are conjugate elements of Bn. As with any group described in terms of generators and relations, it is natural to look for combinatorial solutions to the word and conjugacy problems for the braid group: (1) Word problem: Given words w, w as above, is σ(w)=σ(w)? (2) Conjugacy problem: Given words w, w as above, is σ(w) ∼ σ(w)? The fastest known algorithms for solving Problems (1) and (2) exploit the Gar- side structure(s) of the braid group (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Statement 1 TQFT and Khovanov Homology
    Miller Fellow 1071 Evans Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 +1 805 453-7347 [email protected] http://tqft.net/ Scott Morrison - Research statement 1 TQFT and Khovanov homology During the 1980s and 1990s, surprising and deep connections were found between topology and algebra, starting from the Jones polynomial for knots, leading on through the representation theory of a quantum group (a braided tensor category) and culminating in topological quantum field theory (TQFT) invariants of 3-manifolds. In 1999, Khovanov [Kho00] came up with something entirely new. He associated to each knot diagram a chain complex whose homology was a knot invariant. Some aspects of this construction were familiar; the Euler characteristic of his complex is the Jones polynomial, and just as we had learnt to understand the Jones polynomial in terms of a braided tensor category, Khovanov homology can now be understood in terms of a certain braided tensor 2-category. But other aspects are more mysterious. The categories associated to quantum knot invariants are essentially semisimple, while those arising in Khovanov homology are far from it. Instead they are triangulated, and exact triangles play a central role in both definitions and calculations. My research on Khovanov homology attempts to understand the 4-dimensional geometry of Khovanov homology ( 1.1). Modulo a conjecture on the functoriality of Khovanov homology in 3 § S , we have a construction of an invariant of a link in the boundary of an arbitrary 4-manifold, generalizing the usual invariant in the boundary of the standard 4-ball. While Khovanov homology and its variations provide a ‘categorification’ of quantum knot invariants, to date there has been no corresponding categorification of TQFT 3-manifold in- variants.
    [Show full text]
  • RASMUSSEN INVARIANTS of SOME 4-STRAND PRETZEL KNOTS Se
    Honam Mathematical J. 37 (2015), No. 2, pp. 235{244 http://dx.doi.org/10.5831/HMJ.2015.37.2.235 RASMUSSEN INVARIANTS OF SOME 4-STRAND PRETZEL KNOTS Se-Goo Kim and Mi Jeong Yeon Abstract. It is known that there is an infinite family of general pretzel knots, each of which has Rasmussen s-invariant equal to the negative value of its signature invariant. For an instance, homo- logically σ-thin knots have this property. In contrast, we find an infinite family of 4-strand pretzel knots whose Rasmussen invariants are not equal to the negative values of signature invariants. 1. Introduction Khovanov [7] introduced a graded homology theory for oriented knots and links, categorifying Jones polynomials. Lee [10] defined a variant of Khovanov homology and showed the existence of a spectral sequence of rational Khovanov homology converging to her rational homology. Lee also proved that her rational homology of a knot is of dimension two. Rasmussen [13] used Lee homology to define a knot invariant s that is invariant under knot concordance and additive with respect to connected sum. He showed that s(K) = σ(K) if K is an alternating knot, where σ(K) denotes the signature of−K. Suzuki [14] computed Rasmussen invariants of most of 3-strand pret- zel knots. Manion [11] computed rational Khovanov homologies of all non quasi-alternating 3-strand pretzel knots and links and found the Rasmussen invariants of all 3-strand pretzel knots and links. For general pretzel knots and links, Jabuka [5] found formulas for their signatures. Since Khovanov homologically σ-thin knots have s equal to σ, Jabuka's result gives formulas for s invariant of any quasi- alternating− pretzel knot.
    [Show full text]
  • Khovanov Homology Is an Unknot-Detector
    Khovanov homology is an unknot-detector P. B. Kronheimer and T. S. Mrowka Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge MA 02139 Abstract. We prove that a knot is the unknot if and only if its reduced Khovanov cohomology has rank 1. The proof has two steps. We show first that there is a spectral sequence beginning with the reduced Khovanov cohomology and abutting to a knot homology defined using singular instantons. We then show that the latter homology is isomorphic to the instanton Floer homology of the sutured knot complement: an invariant that is already known to detect the unknot. 1 Introduction 1.1 Statement of results This paper explores a relationship between the Khovanov cohomology of a knot, as defined in [16], and various homology theories defined using Yang-Mills instantons, of which the archetype is Floer’s instanton homology of 3-manifolds [8]. A consequence of this relationship is a proof that Khovanov cohomology detects the unknot. (For related results, see [10, 11, 12]). Theorem 1.1. A knot in S 3 is the unknot if and only if its reduced Khovanov cohomology is Z. In [23], the authors construct a Floer homology for knots and links in 3- manifolds using moduli spaces of connections with singularities in codimension 2. (The locus of the singularity is essentially the link K, or R K in a cylindrical 4-manifold.) Several variations of this construction are already considered in [23], but we will introduce here one more variation, which we call I \.K/. Our invariant I \.K/ is an invariant for unoriented links K S 3 with a marked point x K and a preferred normal vector v to K at x.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutured Khovanov Homology Distinguishes Braids from Other Tangles J
    Math. Res. Lett. c 2014 International Press Volume 21, Number 06, 1263–1275, 2014 Sutured Khovanov homology distinguishes braids from other tangles J. Elisenda Grigsby and Yi Ni We show that the sutured Khovanov homology of a balanced tangle in the product sutured manifold D × I hasrank1ifandonlyif the tangle is isotopic to a braid. 1. Introduction In [11], Khovanov constructed a categorification of the Jones polynomial that assigns a bigraded abelian group to each link in S3. Sutured Khovanov homology is a variant of Khovanov’s construction that assigns • to each link L in the product sutured manifold A × I (see Section 2.1) a triply-graded vector space SKh(L)overF := Z/2Z [1, 19], where A = S1 × [0, 1] and I =[0, 1]; and • to each balanced, admissible tangle T in the product sutured manifold D × I (see Section 2.2) a bigraded vector space SKh(T )overF [6, 13], where D = D2. Khovanov homology detects the unknot [14] and unlinks [3, 8], and the sutured annular Khovanov homology of braid closures detects the trivial braid [2]. In this note, we prove that the sutured Khovanov homology of balanced tangles distinguishes braids from other tangles. Theorem 1.1. Let T ⊂ D × I be a balanced, admissible tangle. (See Sec- ∼ tion 2.2 for the definition.) Then SKh(T ) = F if and only if T is isotopic to a braid in D × I. Theorem 1.1 is one of many results about the connection between Floer homology and Khovanov homology, starting with the work of Ozsv´ath and Szab´o [18].
    [Show full text]
  • The Spectral Sequence from Khovanov Homology to Heegaard Floer Homology and Transverse Links
    The Spectral Sequence from Khovanov Homology to Heegaard Floer Homology and Transverse Links Author: Adam Saltz Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:106790 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2016 Copyright is held by the author. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nd/4.0/). The Spectral Sequence from Khovanov Homology to Heegaard Floer Homology and Transverse Links Adam Saltz A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Boston College Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences April 2016 c Copyright 2016 by Adam Saltz The Spectral Sequence from Khovanov Homology to Heegaard Floer Homology and Transverse Links Adam Saltz Advisor: Professor John Arthur Baldwin, PhD Abstract Khovanov homology and Heegaard Floer homology have opened new horizons in knot theory and three-manifold topology, respectively. The two invariants have distinct origins, but the Khovanov homology of a link is related to the Heegaard Floer homology of its branched double cover by a spectral sequence constructed by Ozsv´athand Szab´o. In this thesis, we construct an equivalent spectral sequence with a much more trans- parent connection to Khovanov homology. This is the first step towards proving Seed and Szab´o'sconjecture that Szab´o'sgeometric spectral sequence is isomorphic to Ozsv´athand Szab´o'sspectral sequence. These spectral sequences connect information about contact structures contained in each invariant.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Contents | 1 1 Introduction Is the “cable spaghetti” on the floor really knotted or is it enough to pull on both ends of the wire to completely unfold it? Since its invention, knot theory has always been a place of interdisciplinarity. The first knot tables composed by Tait have been motivated by Lord Kelvin’s theory of atoms. But it was not until a century ago that tools for rigorously distinguishing the trefoil and its mirror image as members of two different knot classes were derived. In the first half of the twentieth century, knot theory seemed to be a place mainly drivenby algebraic and combinatorial arguments, mentioning the contributions of Alexander, Reidemeister, Seifert, Schubert, and many others. Besides the development of higher dimensional knot theory, the search for new knot invariants has been a major endeav- our since about 1960. At the same time, connections to applications in DNA biology and statistical physics have surfaced. DNA biology had made a huge progress and it was well un- derstood that the topology of DNA strands matters: modeling of the interplay between molecules and enzymes such as topoisomerases necessarily involves notions of ‘knot- tedness’. Any configuration involving long strands or flexible ropes with a relatively small diameter leads to a mathematical model in terms of curves. Therefore knots appear almost naturally in this context and require techniques from algebra, (differential) geometry, analysis, combinatorics, and computational mathematics. The discovery of the Jones polynomial in 1984 has led to the great popularity of knot theory not only amongst mathematicians and stimulated many activities in this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • More on Khovanov Homology
    MORE ON KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY Radmila Sazdanovic´ NC State Summer School on Modern Knot Theory Freiburg 6 June 2017 WHERE WERE WE? • Classification of knots- using knot invariants! • Q How can we get better invariants? A By upgrading/categorifying old ones! • Khovanov link homology lifts the Jones polynomial. ! X X J(L)(q) = ( 1)i rkKh(L) qj = χ(Kh(L)) − j i skein relation long exact sequence of Kh(L) () • Q Why does the choice of algebra A make sense? A1 It’s graded dimension is J( ) A2 Frobenius algebra structure is an algebraic counterpart of the topology of 2d TQFT. KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY IS STRONGER THAN THE JONES POLYNOMIAL i i Kh(10 ) Kh(51) 132 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 -1 Z Z -3 Z -3 Z2 Z -5 Z -5 Z Z2 -7 Z -7 Z Z2 Z2 j -9 Z2 j -9 Z Z2 Z -11 ⊕ Z Z -11 Z Z -13 2 Z -13 Z2 -15 Z -15 Z • Torsion is invisible for the Jones! • Kh(K ) can have non-trivial groups of the same rank in gradings of different parity! They cancel out in the Euler characteristic. 1 1 KHOVANOV HOMOLOGY DIFFERENT COEFFICIENTS • So far: Kh(K ; Z) and Kh(K ; Q) • Next: Kh(K ; Zp) and Kh(K ; Z2) in particular. • How do these homologies relate? THEOREM (UNIVERSAL COEFFICIENT THEOREM) n n n+1 H (C; Zp) = H (C; Z) Zp Tor(H (C); Zp) ∼ ⊗ ⊕ Or in the language of Khovanov link homology: i;j i;j i+1;j Kh (K ; Zp) = Kh (K ; Z) Zp Tor(Kh (K ; Zp)) ∼ ⊗ ⊕ HOW TO COMPUTE? Tor(A; B) = 0 if A or B is free or torsion-free, Tor(Zp; Zq) = ZGCD(p;q) Z Zp = Zp, Zp Zq = ZGCD(p;q), Z2 Z3 = 0, Z6 Z4 = Z2 ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ ⊗ ODD, EVEN, UNIFIED KHOVANOV Kh Even (standard) Khovanov homology Kho Odd (Ozsvath,´ Rasmussen, Szabo´ 2007) 2 Khu Unified theory over R = Z["]=(" 1) (Putyra, 2010) − MODZ2 even or odd theory computed over Z2 RELATIONS BETWEEN THEORIES • Kh(L; Z2) ∼= Kho(L; Z2) • If D0 is the mirror of D then • Both Khovanov chain complexes and homologies are dual.
    [Show full text]