Seventee N the Early Tetrapods and Modern Amphibians

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seventee N the Early Tetrapods and Modern Amphibians Hickman−Roberts−Larson: 17. The Early Tetrapods and Text © The McGraw−Hill Animal Diversity, Third Modern Amphibians Companies, 2002 Edition 17 chapter •••••• seventeen The Early Tetrapods and Modern Amphibians Vertebrate Landfall The chorus of frogs beside a pond on a spring evening heralds one of nature’s dramatic events. Masses of frog eggs soon hatch into limbless, gill-breathing, fishlike tadpole larvae. Warmed by the late spring sun, they feed and grow.Then, almost imperceptibly,a remarkable transfor- mation takes place. Hindlegs appear and gradually lengthen. The tail shortens. The larval teeth are lost, and the gills are replaced by lungs. Eyelids develop. The forelegs emerge. In a matter of weeks the aquatic tadpole has completed its metamorphosis to an adult frog. The evolutionary transition from water to land occurred not in weeks but over millions of years. A lengthy series of alterations cumulatively fitted the vertebrate body plan for life on land. The ori- gin of land vertebrates is no less a remarkable feat for this fact—a feat that incidentally would have a poor chance of succeeding today because well-established competitors make it impossible for a poorly adapted transitional form to gain a foothold. Amphibians are the only living vertebrates that have a transi- tion from water to land in both their ontogeny and phylogeny.Even after some 350 million years of evolution, few amphibians are com- pletely land adapted; most are quasiterrestrial, hovering between aquatic and land environments. This double life is expressed in their name. Even the amphibians that are best adapted for a terrestrial existence cannot stray far from moist conditions. Many,however, have developed ways to keep their eggs out of open water where the larvae would be exposed to enemies. A frog tadpole undergoing metamorphosis. 325 Hickman−Roberts−Larson: 17. The Early Tetrapods and Text © The McGraw−Hill Animal Diversity, Third Modern Amphibians Companies, 2002 Edition 326 chapter seventeen daptation for life on land is a major theme of the Early Evolution remaining vertebrate groups treated in this and the fol- A lowing chapters. These animals form a monophyletic of Terrestrial Vertebrates unit known as tetrapods. The amphibians and the amniotes (including reptiles, birds, and mammals) represent the two Devonian Origin of Tetrapods major extant branches of tetrapod phylogeny. In this chapter, we review what is known about the origins of terrestrial verte- The Devonian period, beginning some 400 million years ago, brates and discuss the amphibian branch in detail. We discuss was a time of mild temperatures and alternating droughts and the major amniote groups in Chapters 18 through 20. floods. During this period some primarily aquatic vertebrates evolved two features that would be important for permitting the subsequent evolution for life on land: lungs and limbs. Movement onto Land The Devonian freshwater environment was unstable. During dry periods,many pools and streams evaporated,water The movement from water to land is perhaps the most dra- became foul, and dissolved oxygen disappeared. Only those matic event in animal evolution, because it involves the inva- fishes able to acquire atmospheric oxygen survived such con- sion of a habitat that in many respects is more hazardous for ditions. Gills were unsuitable because in air the filaments col- life. Life originated in water. Animals are mostly water in com- lapsed, dried, and quickly lost their function. Virtually all position,and all cellular activities occur in water.Nevertheless, freshwater fishes surviving this period, including lobe-finned organisms eventually invaded land, carrying their watery com- fishes and lungfishes (p. 314), had a kind of lung that devel- position with them. Vascular plants, pulmonate snails, and tra- oped as an outgrowth of the pharynx. It was relatively simple cheate arthropods made the transition much earlier than to enhance the efficiency of the air-filled cavity by improving vertebrates, and winged insects were diversifying at approxi- its vascularity with a rich capillary network, and by supplying mately the same time that the earliest terrestrial vertebrates it with arterial blood from the last (sixth) pair of aortic arches. evolved. Although the invasion of land required modification Oxygenated blood returned directly to the heart by a pul- of almost every system in the vertebrate body,aquatic and ter- monary vein to form a complete pulmonary circuit. Thus the restrial vertebrates retain many basic structural and functional double circulation characteristic of all tetrapods originated: similarities. We see a transition between aquatic and terrestrial a systemic circulation serving the body and a pulmonary cir- vertebrates most clearly today in the many living amphibians culation supplying the lungs. that make this transition during their own life histories. Vertebrate limbs also arose during the Devonian period. Beyond the obvious difference in water content, there Although fish fins at first appear very different from the jointed are several important physical differences that animals must limbs of tetrapods, an examination of the bony elements of the accommodate when moving from water to land.These include paired fins of the lobe-finned fishes shows that they broadly (1) oxygen content, (2) density, (3) temperature regulation, resemble the equivalent limbs of amphibians. In Eusthenop- and (4) habitat diversity. Oxygen is at least 20 times more teron, a Devonian lobe-fin, we can recognize an upper arm abundant in air and it diffuses much more rapidly through air bone (humerus) and two forearm bones (radius and ulna) as than through water. Consequently, terrestrial animals can well as other elements that we can homologize with the wrist obtain oxygen far more easily than aquatic ones once they pos- bones of tetrapods (figure 17.1).Eusthenopteron could walk— sess the appropriate adaptations, such as lungs. Air, however, more accurately flop—along the bottom mud of pools with its has approximately 1000 times less buoyant density than water fins,since backward and forward movement of the fins was lim- and is approximately 50 times less viscous. It therefore pro- ited to about 20 to 25 degrees. Acanthostega, one of the earli- vides relatively little support against gravity, requiring terres- est known Devonian tetrapods, had well-formed tetrapod legs trial animals to develop strong limbs and to remodel their with clearly formed digits on both fore- and hindlimbs, but the skeleton to achieve adequate structural support. Air fluctuates limbs were too weakly constructed to enable the animal to in temperature more readily than water does, and terrestrial hoist its body off the surface for proper walking on land. environments therefore experience harsh and unpredictable Ichthyostega, however,with its fully developed shoulder girdle, cycles of freezing,thawing,drying,and flooding.Terrestrial ani- bulky limb bones, well-developed muscles, and other adapta- mals require behavioral and physiological strategies to protect tions for terrestrial life, must have been able to pull itself onto themselves from thermal extremes; one such important strat- land, although it probably did not walk very well. Thus, the egy is homeothermy (regulated constant body temperature) of tetrapods evolved their legs underwater and only then, for rea- birds and mammals. sons unknown, began to pull themselves onto land. Despite its hazards, the terrestrial environment offers a Evidence points to lobe-finned fishes as the closest rela- great variety of habitats including coniferous, temperate, and tives of tetrapods; in cladistic terms they contain the sister tropical forests, grasslands, deserts, mountains, oceanic islands, group of tetrapods (figures 17.2 and 17.3). Both the lobe- and polar regions.Provision of safe shelter for protection of vul- finned fishes and early tetrapods such as Acanthostega and nerable eggs and young may be accomplished much more read- Ichthyostega shared several characteristics of skull, teeth, and ily in many of these terrestrial habitats than in aquatic ones. pectoral girdle. Ichthyostega (Gr. ichthys, fish, + stege¯, roof, or Hickman−Roberts−Larson: 17. The Early Tetrapods and Text © The McGraw−Hill Animal Diversity, Third Modern Amphibians Companies, 2002 Edition Eusthenopteron Acanthostega Cleithrum Humerus Skull Ulna Ulnare Clavicle Radius Intermedium Humerus Dermal fin rays Radius Ulna Phalanges Carpals Ichthyostega Limnoscelis Pelvis Femur Tibia Fibula Fibulare Tarsals Phalanges figure 17.1 Humerus Evolution of the tetrapod leg. The legs of tetrapods evolved from fins of Paleozoic fishes. Eusthenopteron, a late Devonian lobe-finned fish had paired muscular fins supported by bony elements that foreshadowed the bones of tetrapod limbs. The anterior fin contained an upper arm bone (humerus), two forearm bones (radius Radius Ulna and ulna), and smaller elements homologous to the wrist bones of tetrapods. As Carpals typical of fishes, the pectoral girdle, consisting of the cleithrum, clavicle, and other Phalanges bones, was firmly attached to the skull. In Acanthostega, one of the earliest known Devonian tetrapods (appearing about 360 million years BP), dermal fin rays of the anterior appendage were replaced by eight fully evolved fingers. Acanthostega was probably exclusively aquatic because its limbs were too weak for travel on land. Ichthyostega, a contemporary of Acanthostega, had fully formed tetrapod limbs and must have been able to walk on land. The hindlimb bore seven toes (the
Recommended publications
  • How Fishes Breath
    How fishes breath • Respiration in fish or in that of any organism that lives in the water is very different from that of human beings. Organisms like fish, which live in water, need oxygen to breathe so that their cells can maintain their living state. To perform their respiratory function, fish have specialized organs that help them inhale oxygen dissolved in water. • Respiration in fish takes with the help of gills. Most fish possess gills on either side of their head. Gills are tissues made up of feathery structures called gill filaments that provide a large surface area for gas exchange. A large surface area is crucial for gas exchange in aquatic organisms as water contains very little amount of dissolved oxygen. The filaments in fish gills are arranged in rows in the gill arch. Each filament contains lamellae, which are discs supplied with capillaries. Blood enters and leaves the gills through these small blood vessels. Although gills in fish occupy only a small section of their body, the immense respiratory surface created by the filaments provides the whole organism with an efficient gas exchange. • Some fish, like sharks and lampreys, possess multiple gill openings. However, bony fish like Rohu, have a single gill opening on each side. Bony fish (, Osteichthyes ) • . Greek for bone fish, Osteichthyes includes all bony fishes, and given the diversity of animals found in the world's oceans, it should come as no surprise that it is the largest of all vertebrate classes. There are nearly 28,000 members of Osteichthyes currently found on Earth, and numerous extinct species found in fossil form.
    [Show full text]
  • Tadpole Consumption Is a Direct Threat to the Endangered Purple Frog, Nasikabatrachus Sahyadrensis
    SALAMANDRA 51(3) 252–258 30 October 2015 CorrespondenceISSN 0036–3375 Correspondence Tadpole consumption is a direct threat to the endangered purple frog, Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis Ashish Thomas & S. D. Biju Systematics Lab, Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India Corresponding author: S. D. Biju, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 5 July 2014 Accepted: 30 December 2014 by Alexander Kupfer Amphibians across the world are suffering alarming popu- Southeast Asia have witnessed drastic population declines lation declines with nearly one third of the ca 7,300 species caused by overexploitation over the last couple of decades being threatened worldwide (Stuart et al. 2008, Wake & (Warkentin et al. 2008). Often, natural populations are Vredenburg 2008, IUCN 2014). Major factors attributed harvested without regard of the consequences or implica- to the decline include habitat destruction (Houlahan et tions of this practice on the dynamics or sustainability of al. 2000, Sodhi et al. 2008), chemical pollution (Ber ger the exploited populations (Getz & Haight 1989). When 1998), climate change (Adams 1999, Carpenter & Tur- the extent of exploitation is greater than the sustaining ca- ner 2000), diseases (McCallum 2007, Cushman 2006), pacity or turnover rate of a species, there is every possi- and invasive species (Boone & Bridges 2003). The West- bility that the species may become locally extinct, which ern Ghats of India, a global hotspot for amphibian diver- would subsequently have drastic ecological implications sity and endemism (Biju 2001, Biju & Bossuyt 2003), has in the particular region (Duffy 2002, Wright et al. 2006, more than 40% of its amphibian fauna threatened with ex- Carpenter et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Forelimb Position Affects Facultative Bipedal Locomotion in Lizards Chase T
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb185975. doi:10.1242/jeb.185975 RESEARCH ARTICLE Forelimb position affects facultative bipedal locomotion in lizards Chase T. Kinsey* and Lance D. McBrayer‡ ABSTRACT 2004; Clark and Higham, 2011; Tucker and McBrayer, 2012; Parker Recent work indicates that bipedal posture in lizards is advantageous and McBrayer, 2016). During predation events or social ’ during obstacle negotiation. However, little is known about how interactions, a terrestrial vertebrate s behavior, speed and stability bipedalism occurs beyond a lizard’s acceleratory threshold. traversing obstacles may impinge upon their survivorship and/or Furthermore, no study to date has examined the effects of forelimb fitness (Stiller and McBrayer, 2013; Schulte et al., 2004; Arnold, position on the body center of mass (BCoM) in the context of 1983; but see Garland and Losos, 1994). bipedalism. This study quantified the frequency of bipedalism when Stereotyped limb movement in quadrupedal locomotion, or gait, sprinting with versus without an obstacle at 0.8 m from the start of a has predictable footfalls across various speeds (Snyder, 1952, 1954, sprint. Forelimb positions were quantified during bipedal running at 1962; Irschick and Jayne, 1999; Farley and Ko, 1997). Some the start of a sprint and when crossing an obstacle. Two species with terrestrial lizards alter their gait and/or posture while sprinting contrasting body forms (and thus different BCoM) were studied (Schuett et al., 2009; for review, see Russell and Bels, 2001). (Sceloporus woodi and Aspidoscelis sexlineata) to assess potential Facultative bipedalism occurs in some quadrupeds when only the variation due to body plan and obstacle-crossing behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Tadpoles Really Eat? Assessing the Trophic Status of an Understudied and Imperiled Group of Consumers in Freshwater Habitats
    Freshwater Biology (2007) 52, 386–395 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01694.x OPINION What do tadpoles really eat? Assessing the trophic status of an understudied and imperiled group of consumers in freshwater habitats RONALD ALTIG,* MATT R. WHILES† AND CINDY L. TAYLOR‡ *Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, U.S.A. †Department of Zoology and Center for Ecology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, U.S.A. ‡Department of Biology, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. Understanding the trophic status of consumers in freshwater habitats is central to understanding their ecological roles and significance. Tadpoles are a diverse and abundant component of many freshwater habitats, yet we know relatively little about their feeding ecology and true trophic status compared with many other consumer groups. While many tadpole species are labelled herbivores or detritivores, there is surprisingly little evidence to support these trophic assignments. 2. Here we discuss shortcomings in our knowledge of the feeding ecology and trophic status of tadpoles and provide suggestions and examples of how we can more accurately quantify their trophic status and ecological significance. 3. Given the catastrophic amphibian declines that are ongoing in many regions of the planet, there is a sense of urgency regarding this information. Understanding the varied ecological roles of tadpoles will allow for more effective conservation of remaining populations, benefit captive breeding programmes, and allow for more accurate predic- tions of the ecological consequences of their losses. Keywords: amphibian, assimilation, diet, feeding behaviour, omnivory Amphibians are disappearing from the planet at an of the functional roles and trophic status of general- alarming rate (Stuart et al., 2004; Lips et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of the Genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the Eastern Slopes of the Western Ghats, India
    Alytes, 2017, 34 (1¢4): 1¢19. A new species of the genus Nasikabatrachus (Anura, Nasikabatrachidae) from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, India S. Jegath Janani1,2, Karthikeyan Vasudevan1, Elizabeth Prendini3, Sushil Kumar Dutta4, Ramesh K. Aggarwal1* 1Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CSIR-CCMB), Uppal Road, Tarnaka, Hyderabad, 500007, India. <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>. 2Current Address: 222A, 5th street, Annamalayar Colony, Sivakasi, 626123, India.<[email protected]>. 3Division of Vertebrate Zoology, Department of Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York NY 10024-5192, USA. <[email protected]>. 4Nature Environment and Wildlife Society (NEWS), Nature House, Gaudasahi, Angul, Odisha. <[email protected]>. * Corresponding Author. We describe a new species of the endemic frog genus Nasikabatrachus,from the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats, in India. The new species is morphologically, acoustically and genetically distinct from N. sahyadrensis. Computed tomography scans of both species revealed diagnostic osteological differences, particularly in the vertebral column. Male advertisement call analysis also showed the two species to be distinct. A phenological difference in breeding season exists between the new species (which breeds during the northeast monsoon season; October to December), and its sister species (which breeds during the southwest monsoon; May to August). The new species shows 6 % genetic divergence (K2P) at mitochondrial 16S rRNA (1330 bp) partial gene from its congener, indicating clear differentiation within Nasikabatra- chus. Speciation within this fossorial lineage is hypothesized to have been caused by phenological shift in breeding during different monsoon seasons—the northeast monsoon in the new species versus southwest monsoon in N.
    [Show full text]
  • Function of the Respiratory System - General
    Lesson 27 Lesson Outline: Evolution of Respiratory Mechanisms – Cutaneous Exchange • Evolution of Respiratory Mechanisms - Water Breathers o Origin of pharyngeal slits from corner of mouth o Origin of skeletal support/ origin of jaws o Presence of strainers o Origin of gills o Gill coverings • Form - Water Breathers o Structure of Gills Chondrichthyes Osteichthyes • Function – Water Breathers o Pumping action and path of water flow Chondrichthyes Osteichthyes Objectives: At the end of this lesson you should be able to: • Describe the evolutionary trends seen in respiratory mechanisms in water breathers • Describe the structure of the different types of gills found in water breathers • Describe the pumping mechanisms used to move water over the gills in water breathers References: Chapter 13: pgs 292-313 Reading for Next Lesson: Chapter 13: pgs 292-313 Function of the Respiratory System - General Respiratory Organs Cutaneous Exchange Gas exchange across the skin takes place in many vertebrates in both air and water. All that is required is a good capillary supply, a thin exchange barrier and a moist outer surface. As you will remember from lectures on the integumentary system, this is often in conflict with the other functions of the integument. Cutaneous respiration is utilized most extensively in amphibians but is not uncommon in fish and reptiles. It is not used extensively in birds or mammals, although there are instances where it can play an important role (bats loose 12% of their CO2 this way). For the most part, it: - plays a larger role in smaller animals (some small salamanders are lungless). - requires a moist skin which is thin, has a high capillary density and no thick keratinised outer layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and the Evolvability of Human Limbs
    Development and the evolvability of human limbs Nathan M. Younga,1, Günter P. Wagnerb, and Benedikt Hallgrímssonc aDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94110; bDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06405; and cDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N4N1 Edited* by David Pilbeam, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and approved December 29, 2009 (received for review October 14, 2009) The long legs and short arms of humans are distinctive for a fore- and hindlimb modules was reduced, leading to a higher primate, the result of selection acting in opposite directions on degree of variational independence of limb size and shape. Our each limb at different points in our evolutionary history. This model predicts that selection for independent function of the mosaic pattern challenges our understanding of the relationship limbs should lead to alterations to limb covariational structure. of development and evolvability because limbs are serially homol- Specifically, humans and apes would be predicted to exhibit ogous and genetic correlations should act as a significant con- decreased phenotypic correlations between fore- and hindlimb straint on their independent evolution. Here we test a compared to quadrupeds. If decreases in integration between developmental model of limb covariation in anthropoid primates fore- and hindlimb are a product of selection for more inde- and demonstrate that both humans and apes exhibit significantly pendent function of limbs, then the timing of any change in reduced integration between limbs when compared to quadrupe- integration has implications for the reconstruction of ancestral dal monkeys.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida's Fintastic Sharks and Rays Lesson and Activity Packet
    Florida's Fintastic Sharks and Rays An at-home lesson for grades 3-5 Produced by: This educational workbook was produced through the support of the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary Program. 1 What are sharks and rays? Believe it or not, they’re a type of fish! When you think “fish,” you probably picture a trout or tuna, but fishes come in all shapes and sizes. All fishes share the following key characteristics that classify them into this group: Fishes have the simplest of vertebrate hearts with only two chambers- one atrium and one ventricle. The spine in a fish runs down the middle of its back just like ours, making fish vertebrates. All fishes have skeletons, but not all fish skeletons are made out of bones. Some fishes have skeletons made out of cartilage, just like your nose and ears. Fishes are cold-blooded. Cold-blooded animals use their environment to warm up or cool down. Fins help fish swim. Fins come in pairs, like pectoral and pelvic fins or are singular, like caudal or anal fins. Later in this packet, we will look at the different types of fins that fishes have and some of the unique ways they are used. 2 Placoid Ctenoid Ganoid Cycloid Hard protective scales cover the skin of many fish species. Scales can act as “fingerprints” to help identify some fish species. There are several different scale types found in bony fishes, including cycloid (round), ganoid (rectangular or diamond), and ctenoid (scalloped). Cartilaginous fishes have dermal denticles (Placoid) that resemble tiny teeth on their skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha)
    Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) by Richard Kissel A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright by Richard Kissel 2010 Morphology, Phylogeny, and Evolution of Diadectidae (Cotylosauria: Diadectomorpha) Richard Kissel Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Based on dental, cranial, and postcranial anatomy, members of the Permo-Carboniferous clade Diadectidae are generally regarded as the earliest tetrapods capable of processing high-fiber plant material; presented here is a review of diadectid morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and paleozoogeography. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Diadectidae within Diadectomorpha, the sister-group to Amniota, with Limnoscelis as the sister-taxon to Tseajaia + Diadectidae. Analysis of diadectid interrelationships of all known taxa for which adequate specimens and information are known—the first of its kind conducted—positions Ambedus pusillus as the sister-taxon to all other forms, with Diadectes sanmiguelensis, Orobates pabsti, Desmatodon hesperis, Diadectes absitus, and (Diadectes sideropelicus + Diadectes tenuitectes + Diasparactus zenos) representing progressively more derived taxa in a series of nested clades. In light of these results, it is recommended herein that the species Diadectes sanmiguelensis be referred to the new genus
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Diversity and Threatened Species in a Severely Transformed Neotropical Region in Mexico
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Amphibian Diversity and Threatened Species in a Severely Transformed Neotropical Region in Mexico Yocoyani Meza-Parral, Eduardo Pineda* Red de Biología y Conservación de Vertebrados, Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México * [email protected] Abstract Many regions around the world concentrate a large number of highly endangered species that have very restricted distributions. The mountainous region of central Veracruz, Mexico, is considered a priority area for amphibian conservation because of its high level of ende- mism and the number of threatened species. The original tropical montane cloud forest in OPEN ACCESS the region has been dramatically reduced and fragmented and is now mainly confined to ra- Citation: Meza-Parral Y, Pineda E (2015) Amphibian vines and hillsides. We evaluated the current situation of amphibian diversity in the cloud Diversity and Threatened Species in a Severely forest fragments of this region by analyzing species richness and abundance, comparing Transformed Neotropical Region in Mexico. PLoS assemblage structure and species composition, examining the distribution and abundance ONE 10(3): e0121652. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0121652 of threatened species, and identifying the local and landscape variables associated with the observed amphibian diversity. From June to October 2012 we sampled ten forest frag- Academic Editor: Stefan Lötters, Trier University, GERMANY ments, investing 944 person-hours of sampling effort. A total of 895 amphibians belonging to 16 species were recorded. Notable differences in species richness, abundance, and as- Received: May 22, 2014 semblage structure between forest fragments were observed. Species composition be- Accepted: November 11, 2014 tween pairs of fragments differed by an average of 53%, with the majority (58%) resulting Published: March 23, 2015 from species replacement and the rest (42%) explained by differences in species richness.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Tetrapod Relationships Revisited
    Biol. Rev. (2003), 78, pp. 251–345. f Cambridge Philosophical Society 251 DOI: 10.1017/S1464793102006103 Printed in the United Kingdom Early tetrapod relationships revisited MARCELLO RUTA1*, MICHAEL I. COATES1 and DONALD L. J. QUICKE2 1 The Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, The University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637-1508, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2 Department of Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire SL57PY, UK and Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW75BD, UK ([email protected]) (Received 29 November 2001; revised 28 August 2002; accepted 2 September 2002) ABSTRACT In an attempt to investigate differences between the most widely discussed hypotheses of early tetrapod relation- ships, we assembled a new data matrix including 90 taxa coded for 319 cranial and postcranial characters. We have incorporated, where possible, original observations of numerous taxa spread throughout the major tetrapod clades. A stem-based (total-group) definition of Tetrapoda is preferred over apomorphy- and node-based (crown-group) definitions. This definition is operational, since it is based on a formal character analysis. A PAUP* search using a recently implemented version of the parsimony ratchet method yields 64 shortest trees. Differ- ences between these trees concern: (1) the internal relationships of aı¨stopods, the three selected species of which form a trichotomy; (2) the internal relationships of embolomeres, with Archeria
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter18 Reptilia.Pdf
    Chapter 18: Amniote Origins & Reptilian Groups Phylum: Chordata Subphylum: Vertebrata Class Reptilia (~8000 spp.) Order Chelonia: turtles & tortoises Order Squamata: lizards & snakes Order Rhynchocephalia : tuatara Order Crocodilia: crocodiles & alligators Reptiles • Characteristics – amniotic egg • chorion - outermost membrane • allantois - surrounds waste cavity • amnion - encases embryo • yolk sac - surrounds yolk (food) – dry skin – thoracic breathing 1 Amniote Origins amphibians tied to water a) lack shelled eggs b) often have gill-breathing larvae 3 monophyletic assemblage called Amniota named after innermost of three extraembryonic membranes, amnion before the end of the Paleozoic amniotes truly terrestrial 1 developed an egg lungs 2 Amniotes led to the three vertebrate groups a) reptiles b) birds c) mammals Diversity 1. paraphyletic class Reptilia include the first truly terrestrial vertebrates 2. Age of Reptiles lasted over 165 million years & included dinosaurs 3. mass extinction at the end of Mesozoic; modern reptiles represent surviving lineages 4. Tuatara (living fossil), sole survivor of a group that otherwise disappeared 100 mya New Zealand broke off from Australia 100 mya burrowers, nocturnal, eat insects, millipedes, worms reasons for its survival?? 5. lizards & snakes radiated into diverse & abundant groups 6. 300-million-year-old history of reptile life on earth complicated by widespread convergent & parallel evolution among many lineages 2 Changes in Traditional Classification of Reptilian Groups 1. Cladistic methodology insists on hierarchical arrangement of monophyletic groups 2. disqualifies traditional class Reptilia as a valid taxon because not monophyletic 3. Class Reptilia excludes birds, which descend from most recent common ancestor of reptiles 4. makes class Reptilia a paraphyletic group because does not include all descendants & their most recent common ancestor 5.
    [Show full text]