DOCSLIB.ORG

Biological Resources Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biological Resources Assessment APPENDIX B BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT FOR ASH-GRAY PAINTBRUSH (CASTILLEJA CINEREA), BIG BEAR VALLEY MILK-VETCH (ASTRAGALUS LENTIGINOSUS VAR. SIERRAE), BIG BEAR VALLEY PHLOX (PHLOX DOLICHANTHA), BIG BEAR VALLEY SANDWORT (EREMOGONE URSINA), PARISH'S YAMPAH (PERIDERIDIA PARISHII SSP. PARISHII), SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS BLADDERPOD (PHYSARIA KINGII SSP. BERNARDINA), SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS DUDLEYA (DUDLEYA ABRAMSII SSP. AFFINIS), LODGEPOLE CHIPMUNK (NEOTAMIAS SPECIOSUS SPECIOSUS), AND SOUTHERN RUBBER BOA (CHARINA UMBRATICA) PRE-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2020-015/PDR APN 0311-405-01, 0311-395-01 and 0311-395-02 42175 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 San Bernardino County, CA USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map Fawnskin in Section 16 of Township 2 North, Range 1 East Prepared For: Main and Main Capital Group, LLC Mr. Dan Dover 5750 Genesis Court, Suite 103 Frisco, TX 75034 Prepared By and Principal Investigator: GONZALES GONZALES EENNVVIIRROONNMMEENNTTAALL CCOONNSSUULLTTIINNGG,,, LLLLCC 358 Crystal Drive San Jacinto, CA 92583 (760) 777-1621 Report Date: June 6, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. TITLE PAGE ...................................................................................................................................... 3 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 4 III. PROJECT AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 6 A. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 6 SOILS ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 B. PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 16 IV. FOCUS STUDY/SPECIES OF CONCERN ............................................................................................ 17 A. LIST FROM U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS)/CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE (CDFW) 17 B. CONSULT WITH CALIFORNIA NATURAL DIVERSITY DATABASE (CNDDB) ........................................................ 21 C. LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 25 V. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 26 VI. GENERAL BIOLOGICAL SURVEY RESULTS ....................................................................................... 30 A. PLANT ASSOCIATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 30 B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES MAP ................................................................................................................ 33 VII. RARE, ENDANGERED OR SENSITIVE SPECIES AND HABITATS RESULTS ..................................... 42 VIII. IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 81 A. PROBABLE IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................. 81 B. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ......................................................................................................................... 86 C. RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 88 IX. PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES ........................................................................................ 90 MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................................................... 90 X. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 92 A. BIBLIOGRAPHY / REFERENCES CITED ........................................................................................................ 92 B. PERSONS CONTACTED .......................................................................................................................... 96 XI. LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................................. 97 XII. LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... 98 XIII. LIST OF SITE PHOTOS ............................................................................................................... 99 XIV. CERTIFICATION ...................................................................................................................... 117 GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT APN 0311-405-01, 0311-395-01 and 0311-395-02 PAGE 2 I. TITLE PAGE A. Date report prepared: June 6, 2020 B. Report Title: GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT for ASH-GRAY PAINTBRUSH (CASTILLEJA CINEREA), BIG BEAR VALLEY MILK-VETCH (ASTRAGALUS LENTIGINOSUS VAR. SIERRAE), BIG BEAR VALLEY PHLOX (PHLOX DOLICHANTHA), BIG BEAR VALLEY SANDWORT (EREMOGONE URSINA), PARISH'S YAMPAH (PERIDERIDIA PARISHII SSP. PARISHII), SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS BLADDERPOD (PHYSARIA KINGII SSP. BERNARDINA), SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS DUDLEYA (DUDLEYA ABRAMSII SSP. AFFINIS), LODGEPOLE CHIPMUNK (NEOTAMIAS SPECIOSUS SPECIOSUS), AND SOUTHERN RUBBER BOA (CHARINA UMBRATICA) On PRE-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2020-015/PDR; APN 0311-405-01, 0311-395-01 and 0311-395-02; 42175 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 C. Project site location: USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map Fawnskin in Section 16 of Township 2 North, Range 1 East D. Assessor's Parcel Number(s) and any related County assigned planning application numbers (i.e., Tract Map #) : PRE-DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2020-015/PDR APN 0311-405-01, 0311-395-01 and 0311-395-02 42175 Big Bear Boulevard, Big Bear Lake, CA 92315 E. Owner/Applicant: Main and Main Capital Group, LLC Mr. Dan Dover 5750 Genesis Court, Suite 103 Frisco, TX 75034 F. Principal Investigator(s): Teresa Gonzales Address: 358 Crystal Drive San Jacinto, CA 92583 Phone: 760.777-1621 G. Name and phone number of person preparing report and of all persons who performed fieldwork on the site. Name of Person Role on project Teresa Gonzales Prepared report and performed fieldwork Paul Gonzales Performed fieldwork GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT APN 0311-405-01, 0311-395-01 and 0311-395-02 PAGE 3 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Findings and Conclusions Main and Main Capital Group, LLC has proposed development of the 2.92-acre project site located in the City of Big Bear Lake, San Bernardino County, California. In May 2020, Teresa Gonzales, Principal Biologist, and Paul Gonzales, Senior Biologist of Gonzales Environmental Consulting, LLC (GEC) conducted general biological resource assessment (BRA), native plant assessment and habitat assessment for to characterize biological resources on the site, and to identify any biological constraints to the proposed project. Main and Main Capital Group, LLC is planning to install a Grocery outlet and associated parking. The purpose of the BRA was to address potential effects of the project to designated critical habitats and/or any species currently listed or formally proposed for listing as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) or species designated as sensitive by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW, formerly California Department of Fish and Game) and/or the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). The site was assessed for sensitive species known to occur locally. Attention was focused on those State- and/or federally-listed as threatened or endangered species and California Fully Protected species that have been documented in the project vicinity with appropriate habitat. This includes: • Ash-gray paintbrush (Castilleja cinerea) • Big Bear Valley milk-vetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. sierrae) • Big Bear Valley phlox (Phlox dolichantha) • Big Bear Valley sandwort (Eremogone ursina) • Parish's yampah (Perideridia parishii ssp. parishii) • San Bernardino Mountains bladderpod (Physaria kingii ssp. bernardina) • San Bernardino Mountains dudleya (Dudleya abramsii ssp. affinis) • Lodgepole chipmunk (Neotamias speciosus speciosus) • Southern rubber boa (Charina umbratica) In addition to the above listed species, the site was assessed for its potential suitability to support San Bernardino flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus californicus). Although not a State- or federally-listed species, San Bernardino flying squirrel are a CDFW Species of Special Concern and are considered a particularly sensitive species within the region. The site consists of habitat characterized as disturbed, Ericameria nauseosa (Rubber rabbitbrush scrub) Alliance, landscape and Pinus ponderosa (Ponderosa GENERAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AND HABITAT ASSESSMENT APN 0311-405-01, 0311-395-01 and 0311-395-02 PAGE 4 pine forest) Alliance. The locations of the native plant communities within the project footprint have been impacted by anthropogenic activities in the area,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Egg-Mimics of Streptanthus (Cruciferae) Deter Oviposition by Pieris Sisymbrii (Lepidoptera: Pieridae)
    Oecologia (Berl) (1981) 48:142-143 Oecologia Springer-Verlag 198l Short Communication Egg-Mimics of Streptanthus (Cruciferae) Deter Oviposition by Pieris sisymbrii (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Arthur M. Shapiro Department of Zoology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Summary. Streptanthus breweri, a serpentine-soil annual mus- appear to decrease the attractiveness of mature S. glandulosus tard, produces pigmented callosities on its upper leaves which to ovipositing females (Shapiro, in press). are thought to mimic the eggs of the Pierid butterfly Pieris The efficacy of the suspected egg-mimics of S. breweri was sisymbrii. P. sisymbrii is one of several inflorescence - infructes- tested afield at Turtle Rock, Napa County, California (North cence-feeding Pierids which assess egg load visually on individual Coast Ranges). The site is an almost unvegetated, steep serpen- host plants prior to ovipositing. Removal of the "egg-mimics" tine talus slope with a S to SW exposure. S. breweri is the domi- from S. breweri plants in situ significantly increases the probabili- nant Crucifer (S. glandulosus also occurs) and P. sisymbrii the ty of an oviposition relative to similar, intact plants. dominant Pierid (Anthocharis sara Lucas and Euchloe hyantis Edw., both Euchloines, are present). On 10 April 1980 I prepared two lists of 50 numbers from a random numbers table. On 11 April, 100 plants of S. breweri "Egg-load assessment" occurs when a female insect's choice in the appropriate phenophase (elongating/budding, bearing egg- to oviposit or not on a given substrate is influenced by whether mimics) were numbered and tagged. Each was measured, its or not eggs (con or heterospecific) are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Memo
    Appendix C Botanical Memo 10 May 2015 To Willow Creek Community Service District Copy to Patrick Kaspari, Senior Project Manager, GHD Inc. From Cara Scott, Botanist, GHD Inc. Tel 707.443.8326 Subject Special-Status Plant Species Survey and Mapping for Job no. 8410746.05 the Downtown Wastewater Development Project, Willow Creek, CA 1 Introduction On April 10 and May 8, 2015, special-status plant surveys and mapping were conducted for the proposed Downtown Wastewater Development Project in Willow Creek, Humboldt County, California . This survey attempted to identify all vascular plants within the project boundary and to document the presence of special-status plants. The purpose of these surveys was to map presence of special-status plant species and to document the approximate number of individuals and percent cover for each occurrence observed. The results will be used to reduce impacts associated with project construction and to avoid special-status plant populations 1.1 Location The unincorporated community of Willow Creek is located in Humboldt County approximately 45 miles northeast of Eureka, California as shown in Figure 1, Attachment 1. Willow Creek is situated along the Trinity River, which is part of the Klamath River Basin. The Willow Creek Community Services District (WCCSD or District) service area or district boundary is shown on Figure 2 and primarily consists of properties along State Highways 299 and 96. The Pacific Ocean is located approximately 26 miles to the west. The site corresponds to portions of Sections 32 and 33, Township 7 North, Range 5 East on the USGS 7.5 Minute Willow Creek and Salyer quadrangles.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 12 - Number 1 March 2005
    Utah Lepidopterist Bulletin of the Utah Lepidopterists' Society Volume 12 - Number 1 March 2005 Extreme Southwest Utah Could See Iridescent Greenish-blue Flashes A Little Bit More Frequently by Col. Clyde F. Gillette Battus philenor (blue pipevine swallowtail) flies in the southern two- thirds of Arizona; in the Grand Canyon (especially at such places as Phantom Ranch 8/25 and Indian Gardens 12/38) and at its rims [(N) 23/75 and (S) 21/69]; in the low valleys of Clark Co., Nevada; and infrequently along the Meadow Valley Wash 7/23 which parallels the Utah/Nevada border in Lincoln Co., Nevada. Since this beautiful butterfly occasionally flies to the west, southwest, and south of Utah's southwest corner, one might expect it to turn up now and then in Utah's Mojave Desert physiographic subsection of the Basin and Range province on the lower southwest slopes of the Beaver Dam Mountains, Battus philenor Blue Pipevine Swallowtail Photo courtesy of Randy L. Emmitt www.rlephoto.com or sporadically fly up the "Dixie Corridor" along the lower Virgin River Valley. Even though both of these Lower Sonoran life zone areas reasons why philenor is not a habitual pipevine species.) Arizona's of Utah offer potentially suitable, resident of Utah's Dixie. But I think interesting plant is Aristolochia "nearby" living conditions for Bat. there is basically only one, and that is watsonii (indianroot pipevine), which phi. philenor, such movements have a complete lack of its larval has alternate leaves shaped like a not often taken place. Or, more foodplants in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Oaks (Quercus Spp.): a Brief History
    Publication WSFNR-20-25A April 2020 Oaks (Quercus spp.): A Brief History Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources Quercus (oak) is the largest tree genus in temperate and sub-tropical areas of the Northern Hemisphere with an extensive distribution. (Denk et.al. 2010) Oaks are the most dominant trees of North America both in species number and biomass. (Hipp et.al. 2018) The three North America oak groups (white, red / black, and golden-cup) represent roughly 60% (~255) of the ~435 species within the Quercus genus worldwide. (Hipp et.al. 2018; McVay et.al. 2017a) Oak group development over time helped determine current species, and can suggest relationships which foster hybridization. The red / black and white oaks developed during a warm phase in global climate at high latitudes in what today is the boreal forest zone. From this northern location, both oak groups spread together southward across the continent splitting into a large eastern United States pathway, and much smaller western and far western paths. Both species groups spread into the eastern United States, then southward, and continued into Mexico and Central America as far as Columbia. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Today, Mexico is considered the world center of oak diversity. (Hipp et.al. 2018) Figure 1 shows genus, sub-genus and sections of Quercus (oak). History of Oak Species Groups Oaks developed under much different climates and environments than today. By examining how oaks developed and diversified into small, closely related groups, the native set of Georgia oak species can be better appreciated and understood in how they are related, share gene sets, or hybridize.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Aquarius Milkvetch (Astragalus Newberryi Var
    Arizona BLM Sensitive Species List (October, 2005) AZ-100 AZ-200 AZ-310 AZ-410 AZ-320 AZ-420 AZ-330 Key: V=Verified Occurrence Arizona Phoenix Kingman Safford Yuma Tucson Lake X=Probable/Possible Occurrence Strip Havasu Plants Aquarius milkvetch (Astragalus newberryi var. aquarii) V Aravaipa woodfern (Thelypteris puberula var. sonorensis) V V Aravaipa sage (Salvia amissa) V Arizona Sonoran rosewood (Vauquelinia californica ssp sonorensis) V Bartram stonecrop (Graptopetalum bartramii) V Black Rock daisy (Townsendia smithii) V Blue sand lily (Triteleiopsis palmeri) V California flannelbush (Fremontodendron californica) V V Chisos Mountains coralroot (Hexalectris revoluta) X Cliff milkvetch (Astragalus cremnophylax var.myriorraphus) V Clifton rock daisy (Perityle ambrosiifolia) V Dalhouse spleenwort (Asplenium (Ceterach) dalhousiae) V Diamond Butte milkvetch (Astragalus toanus var.scidulus) V Fish Creek fleabane (Erigeron piscaticus) X Gentry indigo bush (Dalea tentaculoides) X Giant sedge (Carex spissa var. ultra) V V V Grand Canyon rose (Rosa stellata var.abyssa) V Huachuca golden aster (Heterotheca rutteri) V Huachuca milkvetch (Astragalus hypoxylus) X Kaibab pincushion cactus (Pediocactus paradinei) V Kearney sumac (Rhus kearneyi ssp kearneyi) V Kofa Mt barberry (Berberis harrisoniana) X X X Marble Canyon Milkvetch (Astragalus cremnophylax var. hevronii) V Mt Trumbull beardtongue (Penstemon distans) V Murphey agave (Agave murpheyi) V Paria Plateau fishhook cactus (Sclerocactus sileri) V Attachment 1 - 1 Arizona BLM Sensitive Species
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of the Upper Santa Ana River Watershed, San Bernardino Mountains, California
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281748553 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Article · January 2013 CITATIONS READS 0 28 6 authors, including: Naomi S. Fraga Thomas Stoughton Rancho Santa Ana B… Plymouth State Univ… 8 PUBLICATIONS 14 3 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Thomas Stoughton Retrieved on: 24 November 2016 Crossosoma 37(1&2), 2011 9 THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED, SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS, CALIFORNIA Naomi S. Fraga, LeRoy Gross, Duncan Bell, Orlando Mistretta, Justin Wood1, and Tommy Stoughton Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden 1500 North College Avenue Claremont, California 91711 1Aspen Environmental Group, 201 North First Avenue, Suite 102, Upland, California 91786 [email protected] All Photos by Naomi S. Fraga ABSTRACT: We present an annotated catalogue of the vascular flora of the upper Santa Ana River watershed, in the southern San Bernardino Mountains, in southern California. The catalogue is based on a floristic study, undertaken from 2008 to 2010. Approximately 65 team days were spent in the field and over 5,000 collections were made over the course of the study. The study area is ca. 155 km2 in area (40,000 ac) and ranges in elevation from 1402 m to 3033 m. The study area is botanically diverse with more than 750 taxa documented, including 56 taxa of conservation concern and 81 non-native taxa. Vegetation and habitat types in the area include chaparral, evergreen oak forest and woodland, riparian forest, coniferous forest, montane meadow, and pebble plain habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Pedal Path Brochure
    This brochure lists common plant species found along the Big Bear Lake Pedal Path. Species occurrence varies across a rainfall gradient extending from Stanfield Cutoff (drier species) to the Big Bear Solar Observatory (more mesic species) To help locate plants, the path is divided into five sections on the map (A,B,C,D,&E). Please remain on the designated path to avoid damaging sensitive plant species. Please deposit any trash in waste receptacles at trailheads. For your safety, please watch out for bikes, runners, and strollers while looking for plants along the path For additional information please contact the Big Bear Discovery Center at (909)- 866-3437 Take pictures not flowers, PLEASE Compiled during the Spring of 2005 by: Scott Eliason (District Botanist) Kerry Myers (Botanist) Jason Bill (GIS Specialist) Alpine Pedal Path Plant Walk Plant Walk List Tree(T) Herb(H) Scientific Name Common Name Shrub(S) Section Native? Bloom Time Abies concolor white fir T A,B,C,D,E YES Spring /Summ. Abronia nana Coville's dwarf abronia H A YES June-Aug. Achillea millefolium yarrow H B YES March-July Achnatherum hymenoides Indian ricegrass H C YES Summer Amelanchier utahensis serviceberry S A,B,C,D,E YES April-May Anisocoma acaulis scalebud H C YES Summer Antennaria rosea pussy-toes H A,B YES June-Aug. Aquilegia formosa columbine H B YES June-Aug. Arabis pulchra beauty rockcress H A,B,C,D,E YES April-May Arceuthobium campylopodum western dwarf mistletoe H B,C,D,E YES Oct.-Dec. Arctostaphylos patula manzanita S B,C,D,E YES May-June Artemisia dracunculus tarragon H A,E YES Aug.-Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems
    Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems Sims, L., Goheen, E., Kanaskie, A., & Hansen, E. (2015). Alder canopy dieback and damage in western Oregon riparian ecosystems. Northwest Science, 89(1), 34-46. doi:10.3955/046.089.0103 10.3955/046.089.0103 Northwest Scientific Association Version of Record http://cdss.library.oregonstate.edu/sa-termsofuse Laura Sims,1, 2 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, 1085 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Ellen Goheen, USDA Forest Service, J. Herbert Stone Nursery, Central Point, Oregon 97502 Alan Kanaskie, Oregon Department of Forestry, 2600 State Street, Salem, Oregon 97310 and Everett Hansen, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 1085 Cordley Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Alder Canopy Dieback and Damage in Western Oregon Riparian Ecosystems Abstract We gathered baseline data to assess alder tree damage in western Oregon riparian ecosystems. We sought to determine if Phytophthora-type cankers found in Europe or the pathogen Phytophthora alni subsp. alni, which represent a major threat to alder forests in the Pacific Northwest, were present in the study area. Damage was evaluated in 88 transects; information was recorded on damage type (pathogen, insect or wound) and damage location. We evaluated 1445 red alder (Alnus rubra), 682 white alder (Alnus rhombifolia) and 181 thinleaf alder (Alnus incana spp. tenuifolia) trees. We tested the correlation between canopy dieback and canker symptoms because canopy dieback is an important symptom of Phytophthora disease of alder in Europe. We calculated the odds that alder canopy dieback was associated with Phytophthora-type cankers or other biotic cankers.
    [Show full text]
  • Split Rock Trail Most Diverse Vegetation Types in North America
    Species List Species List National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Color Species Habit Season Color Species Habit Season Section 2, ■ • Section 1 W Ambrosia dumosa (burrobush) S C Y Opuntia chlorotica (pancake cactus) C c Joshua Tree National Park W Brickellia atractyloides (pungent brickellia) S c Y Rhus aromatica (skunk bush) s C w Caulanthus cooperi (Cooper's caulanthus) A c Y Senegalia greggii (cat's claw acacia) s H % w Chaenacf/s srew'o('c/es (Esteve's pincushion) A c Y Senna armata (desert senna) s C, H w Cryptantha barbigera (bearded forget-me-not) A c Y Tetradymia stenolepis (Mojave cottonthorn) s H w Cryptantha nevadensis (Nevada forget-me-not) A c 0 Adenophyllum porophylloides (San Felipe dyssodia) SS C, H tv w Eriogonum davidsonii (Davidson's buckwheat) A c, H 0 Sphaeraicea ambigua (apricot mallow) p C V w Eriogonum fasciculatum (California buckwheat) S C, H p Allium parishii (Parish's onion) B C \ w Eriogonum wrightii (Wright's buckwheat) SS H p Cylindropuntia ramosissima (pencil cholla) c H t Section 4 w Euphorbia albomarginata (rattlesnake weed) A C, H I p Echinocereus engelmannii (hedgehog cactus) c C P- ♦ Section 31 w Galium stellatum (starry bedstraw) SS C p Krameria erecta (littieleaf ratany) s C W/P Giliastellata (stargiiia) A C P/W Mirabilis laevis (wishbone bush) p c w Lepidium lasiocarpum (white pepperweed) A c _PJ Opuntia basilaris (beavertai! cactus) c c N w Lycium andersonii (Anderson's boxthorn) S c p Stephanomeria exigua (small wirelettuce) A C,H A w Lydum cooperi (Cooper's boxthorn) s c p Stephanomeria parryi (Parry's wirelettuce) P c w Nolina parryi (Parry nolina) s c p IStephanomeria paudflora (brownplume wirelettuce) SS c 0 500 2000 Feet w Pectocarya recurvata (arched-nut comb-bur) A c Boechera xylopoda (bigfoot hybrid rockcress) P c 0 150 600 Meters w Pecfocarya serosa (round-nut comb-bur) A c Delphinium parishii (Parish's larkspur) P c See inside of guide for plants found in each section of this map.
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for Five Carbonate Plants from the San Bernardino Mountains in Southern California; Final Rule
    Tuesday, December 24, 2002 Part II Department of the Interior 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Five Carbonate Plants From the San Bernardino Mountains in Southern California; Final Rule VerDate 0ct<31>2002 21:23 Dec 23, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\24DER2.SGM 24DER2 78570 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 247 / Tuesday, December 24, 2002 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The and a number of private stakeholders Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, at the (e.g., mining interests) are in the process Fish and Wildlife Service above address; telephone 760/431–9440, of developing the Carbonate Habitat facsimile 760/431–5902. Information Management Strategy (draft CHMS) to 50 CFR Part 17 regarding this designation is available in conserve four of the five subject alternate formats upon request. carbonate plants while accommodating RIN 1018–AI27 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: other land uses. The USFS is the lead agency for this action. The goals of the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Background and Plants; Designation of Critical CHMS are: (1) To protect the listed Habitat for Five Carbonate Plants From The five plants addressed in this plants and the habitat components they the San Bernardino Mountains in designation of critical habitat, require; (2) to guide impact Southern California Astragalus albens (Cushenbury milk- minimization and compensation for vetch), Erigeron parishii (Parish’s daisy), unavoidable impacts; (3) to streamline AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Eriogonum ovalifolium var. vineum reviews of mining activities in carbonate Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review: Suomen Kiitajat Ja Kehraajat
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 52(3), 1998,342-.343 BOOK REVIEWS PAPILIONIDAE Y PIEHIDAE DE MEXICO: DlSTHIBUCI6N GEOGHAFICA E ILUSTRACI6N, by Jorge E. Llorente-Bousquets, Leonor Onate-Ocana, Armando Luis-Martine z, and Isabel Vargas-Femandez. Illustrations by Pal Janos. 1997. Published by Comision Nacional Para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) and Facultad de Ciencias, Uni­ versidad Nacional Autanoma de Mexico. 227 + 8 pages, 28 color plates, 116 distribution maps. Softcover, glossy pape r, 21.5 x 28.0 cm, ISBN 968-36-6456-3. Available from the Museo d e Zoologfa, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Apdo. Postal 70-399, Ciudad Universi­ taria, 04510, Mexico D.F., e-mail: [email protected]. for about u.s. $35.00. Since its formation in 1978, the "Alfonso L. Herrera" Zoology Museum (MZFC) in the Sciences Department at Mexico's National Autonomous Unive rsity has been one of the leading Mexican natural history research institutions, with collections and specialists in groups such as ectoparasites, fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, mammals, and Lepidoptera, especially butterflies. In the last 20 years, tbis institution has amassed and assembled one of the largest and most complete collections of Mexican butterflies. Published results of fieldwork by museum faculty in the Mexican states of Veracruz, Oaxaca, Guerre ro, Colima, and Jalisco bave revealed a much more diverse butterfly fauna in those states than was pre­ viously believed, and have made available a tremendous amount of new information on tbe temporal and geographical distribution of the butterfly fauna in westem Mexico. For a nation with approxi mately 2000 species of butterflies (including skippers), sur­ priSingly few regional lists of species and no comprehensive field gUides to any group of butterflies are available.
    [Show full text]