DOCSLIB.ORG

Program Presentation 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Program Presentation 2013 Submitted to the Office for Accreditation American Library Association August 19, 2013 Contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................ viii Required Information ................................................................................................. x Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 Organization of the Program Presentation ................................................................................. 2 Preparation of the Program Presentation ................................................................................... 2 Standard I: Mission, Goals, and Objectives ..................................................................7 Context ........................................................................................................................................ 8 The National Capital Region .................................................................................................... 8 The University of Ottawa ........................................................................................................ 9 The Faculty of Arts ................................................................................................................. 10 ÉSIS ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Program Planning ...................................................................................................................... 11 Program Planning Framework ............................................................................................... 11 Mission .................................................................................................................................. 12 Program Goals ....................................................................................................................... 13 Program Objectives ................................................................................................................... 17 Defining Student Learning Outcomes ................................................................................... 17 Our Expectations of Our Students ......................................................................................... 18 Program Evaluation ................................................................................................................... 21 Measuring Achievement ....................................................................................................... 21 Communication and Consultation ......................................................................................... 25 Summary Assessment ............................................................................................................... 29 Sources of Evidence ................................................................................................................... 30 Governance ........................................................................................................................... 30 Advisory Committees ............................................................................................................ 30 Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................ 30 Program Planning .................................................................................................................. 30 Program Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 31 Communications and Marketing ........................................................................................... 31 Standard II: Curriculum ............................................................................................. 32 Context ...................................................................................................................................... 33 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 34 Student Learning Outcomes .................................................................................................. 34 Core Competencies ............................................................................................................... 36 Bilingual Requirement ........................................................................................................... 37 Scope ......................................................................................................................................... 38 Core Curriculum .................................................................................................................... 38 Elective Courses ..................................................................................................................... 40 Orientation ................................................................................................................................ 42 Tailoring Individual Programs of Study ..................................................................................... 45 Program Options ................................................................................................................... 45 Program Pathways................................................................................................................. 46 Specialized Fields of Study ........................................................................................................ 47 Program Delivery ....................................................................................................................... 47 Review and Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 48 Program Planning Framework ............................................................................................... 48 Comprehensive Curriculum Review ...................................................................................... 49 Mechanisms for Ongoing Curriculum Review ....................................................................... 50 Capstone Evaluations ............................................................................................................ 53 Continuous Improvement ..................................................................................................... 54 Summary Assessment ............................................................................................................... 55 Sources of Evidence ................................................................................................................... 56 Governance ........................................................................................................................... 56 Advisory Committees ............................................................................................................ 57 Policies and Procedures ........................................................................................................ 57 Program Planning .................................................................................................................. 57 Program Evaluation ............................................................................................................... 57 Communications and Marketing ........................................................................................... 58 Teaching and Learning........................................................................................................... 58 Standard III: Faculty .................................................................................................. 59 Context ...................................................................................................................................... 61 Faculty Profiles .......................................................................................................................... 62 Full-Time Professors .............................................................................................................. 62 Cross-Appointed Professors .................................................................................................. 67 ÉSIS Program Presentation | Contents ii Adjunct Professors and Sessional Lecturers .......................................................................... 70 Teaching, Research, and Service ............................................................................................... 75 Appointment Policies and Procedures .................................................................................. 75 Tenure and Promotion .......................................................................................................... 76 Encouraging Innovation in Teaching ..................................................................................... 77 Encouraging Innovation in Research ..................................................................................... 79 Encouraging Engagement and Leadership in Service ............................................................ 80 Recruitment and Personnel Policies .........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • On the Loose: a Guide to Life Online for Post-Secondary Students

    On the Loose: a Guide to Life Online for Post-Secondary Students

    on the loose A GUIDE TO LIFE ONLINE FOR POST-SECONDARY STUDENTS CANADA’S CENTRE FOR DIGITASUPPORTEDL AND MEDIA LITER BYACY LE CENTRE CANADIEN D’ÉDUCATION AUX MEDIAS ET DE LITTÉRATIE NUMÉRIQUE Now that you are a post-secondary student, whether you’re still at home or off on your own for the first time, you have a lot more freedom than you used to and that affects your online life too. This guide will help you get off on the right foot with tips on how The guide is divided into four sections: to deal with the ways that your classes and relationships have changed and new SURVIVING SCHOOL Addressing new challenges when using the challenges like managing your money and Internet for research in college or university. taking care of yourself when there’s nobody looking over your shoulder. We’ll also help you spot potential problems with tips and LET’S TALK ABOUT MONEY Ways to be a smart shopper and how to solutions for staying on top of things before protect yourself and your computer. they get out of control. OTHER PEOPLE PROBLEMS Managing your online relationships – with friends and more-than-friends. TAKING CARE OF YOURSELF Ways to take care of yourself when you’re dealing with stress, harassment, and other issues that can come with being online. Additionally, controlling your online profile. © 2016 MEDIASMARTS WWW.MEDIASMARTS.CA ON THE LOOSE: A GUIDE TO LIFE ONLINE FOR POST-SECONDARY STUDENTS 3 SURVIVING SCHOOL You’re not in high school anymore – there’s nobody holding your hand, looking over your shoulder, and bugging you to get your work done.
  • TFG 2018 Global Report

    TFG 2018 Global Report

    Twitter Public Policy #TwitterForGood 2018 Global Report Welcome, Twitter’s second #TwitterForGood Annual Report reflects the growing and compelling impact that Twitter and our global network of community partners had in 2018. Our corporate philanthropy mission is to reflect and augment the positive power of our platform. We perform our philanthropic work through active civic engagement, employee volunteerism, charitable contributions, and in-kind donations, such as through our #DataForGood and #AdsForGood programs. In these ways, Twitter seeks to foster greater understanding, equality, and opportunity in the communities where we operate. Employee Charity Matching Program This past year, we broke new ground by implementing our Employee Charity Matching Program. This program avails Twitter employees of the opportunity to support our #TwitterForGood work by matching donations they make to our charity partners around the world. After it was launched in August 2018, Twitter employees donated US$195K to 189 charities around the world. We look forward to expanding this new program in 2019 by garnering greater employee participation and including additional eligible charities. @NeighborNest This year, our signature philanthropic initiative – our community tech lab called the @NeighborNest – was recognized by the Mutual of America Foundation. The Foundation awarded Twitter and Compass Family Services, one of our local community partners, with the 2018 Community Partnership Award. This is one of the top philanthropic awards in the U.S., recognizing community impact by an NGO/private sector partnership. Since opening in 2015, we’ve conducted over 4,000 hours of programming and welcomed over 15,000 visits from the community. This was made possible in partnership with over 10 key nonprofit partners, nearly 900 unique visits from Twitter volunteers, and over 1,400 hours of volunteer service.
  • Media and Digital Literacy Engaging and Empowering Youth Annual Report 09

    Media and Digital Literacy Engaging and Empowering Youth Annual Report 09

    MEDIA AND DIGITAL LITERACY ENGAGING AND EMPOWERING YOUTH ANNUAL REPORT 09 Table of Contents CHAIR’S MESSAGE ............................................................................................. 2 CO-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS’ MESSAGE .................................................... 4 MEDIA AND DIGITAL LITERACY ................................................................. 7 MEDIA AWARENESS NETWORK ................................................................... 9 REACHING OUT .............................................................................................. 10 TACKLING THE ISSUES .................................................................................. 15 COLLABORATING ........................................................................................... 16 OUR TEAM ......................................................................................................... 20 BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES ........................................... 21 SPONSORS ............................................................................................................. 25 AUDITOR’S REPORT ........................................................................................... 26 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 27 WWW.MEDIA-AWARENESS.CA CHAIR’S MESSAGE 2009 was marked by challenge and change: for the world, for Canada and for MNet. As a not-for- profit educational organization, we were swept up in the economic tsunami that impacted
  • Algorithmic Awareness

    Algorithmic Awareness

    ALGORITHMIC AWARENESS CONVERSATIONS WITH YOUNG CANADIANS ABOUT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND PRIVACY Algorithmic Awareness: Conversations with Young Canadians about Artificial Intelligence and Privacy This report can be downloaded from: mediasmarts.ca/research-policy Cite as: Brisson-Boivin, Kara and Samantha McAleese. (2021). “Algorithmic Awareness: Conversations with Young Canadians about Artificial Intelligence and Privacy.” MediaSmarts. Ottawa. Written for MediaSmarts by: Kara Brisson-Boivin, PhD Samantha McAleese MediaSmarts 205 Catherine Street, Suite 100 Ottawa, ON Canada K2P 1C3 T: 613-224-7721 F: 613-761-9024 Toll-free line: 1-800-896-3342 [email protected] mediasmarts.ca @mediasmarts This research was made possible by the financial contributions from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada’s contributions program. Algorithmic Awareness: Conversations with Young Canadians about Artificial Intelligence and Privacy. MediaSmarts © 2021 2 Table of Contents Key Terms .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence: ............................................................................................... 9 What We (Don't) Know .........................................................................................................................
  • Philosophy and Our Present

    Philosophy and Our Present

    ACTUALITIES: PHILOSOPHY AND OUR PRESENT an Ottawa-wide interdisciplinary student conference co-organized by the uOttawa Graduate Philosophy Student Association, Saint Paul University, the Carleton University Philosophy Society and the Dominican University College Student Association, with the assistance of the uOttawa Undergraduate Philosophy Student Association 1st – 4th March 2018 Keynote Speakers: Iva Apostolova (Dominican University College) Wes Furlotte (Dominican University College) Matthew R. McLennan (Saint Paul University) Douglas Moggach (University of Ottawa) Julie Paquette (Saint Paul University) Devin Zane Shaw (Carleton University) Zoe Todd (Carleton University) NOTE: Apart from the presentations at Saint Paul University on 1st March, all keynote presentations are 45 minutes long, followed by a 15-minute discussion period; and all student presentations are 30 minutes long, followed by a 15-minute discussion period as well. Thursday, 1st March (Saint Paul University; Room 117, Guigues Hall) « (Re)penser la société de contrôle » (Université Saint-Paul) 6:00 p.m. Julie Paquette, ‘De la société disciplinaire, à la société de contrôle, à la société algorithmique: le nouvel avatar’ (20 mins + 10 mins discussion) 6:30 p.m. Laurence Pelchat-Labelle, ‘Deleuze et la non-communication: propédeutique à la désobéissance civile électronique’ (20 mins) Marie-Hélène Casimiro, ‘Résilience face à la société de contrôle: Communauté LGBTQ+ et nouveaux médias’ (20 mins) Geneviève Ratelle, ‘Immobilisme et biopolitique: perspectives critiques sur le système pénal canadien’ (20 mins) 7:30 p.m. EXTENDED DISCUSSION PERIOD 7:50 p.m. PAUSE 8:00 p.m. Martin Samson, ‘Changements climatique, Anthropocène et éco-pouvoir: Pour une critique réalist-dialectique de la société de contrôle à l’aune de la crise écologique’ (20 mins + 10 mins discussion) 8:30 p.m.
  • Iva Apostolova Faculty of Philosophy, Dominican University College 96 Empress Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G3 (613) 233 5696, Ext. 337 Iva.Apostolova@Dominicanu.Ca

    Iva Apostolova Faculty of Philosophy, Dominican University College 96 Empress Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G3 (613) 233 5696, Ext. 337 [email protected]

    Iva Apostolova Faculty of Philosophy, Dominican University College 96 Empress Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1R 7G3 (613) 233 5696, ext. 337 [email protected] Current title: Associate Professor Current Position: Vice-President Academic Affairs and Registrar, Dominican University College Citizenship: Canadian Area of Specialization: Analytic Philosophy (with focus on Bertrand Russell), Epistemology, Critical Analysis Area of Competence: Feminist Philosophy (also proto-feminist thinkers from 17th -19th Century), Russian Philosophy, Applied Ethics, Philosophy of Education Education Ph.D. in Philosophy University of Ottawa Thesis: “Sensation, Memory and Imagination in Bertrand Russell’s Philosophy 1910-1926" (see the attached thesis abstract) Advisor: Dr. Paul Forster, University of Ottawa External Advisor: Dr. Nicholas Griffin, McMaster University MA in Philosophy Sofia University Thesis: “The Problem of Skepticism in David Hume’s Philosophy in the Light of the Problem of Miracles” Advisor: Dr. Dimitar Denkov, Sofia University Bachelor’s in Philosophy Sofia University Specialization in Philosophy for Children program Sofia University 1 | P a g e National Lycée for Ancient Languages and Civilizations, Sofia. Specialization: literature, graduated with a dissertation, “Garcia Marquez: Work beyond the Myth.” Awards and Achievements • Admission Scholarship, University of Ottawa • Department of Philosophy Summer Research Scholarship (competitive scholarship), University of Ottawa • Dean’s list, Sofia University Teaching Experience Dominican University
  • Knights of Columbus' Good Works Assist Parish and Community

    Knights of Columbus' Good Works Assist Parish and Community

    September 2012 Knights of Columbus’ good works assist parish and community The local councils of the Knights of Columbus (KofC) remain vigilant in providing assistance to those in need while adhering to their Roman Catholic beliefs that are the driving force behind the organization as it continues to grow. “I always recognized it as a great service group within the church, which ties faith to service and service to faith,” says Jack Schreader, a member since 2005 and Grand Knight of the KofC, Bishop N.Z. Lorrain Council 1531 of Pembroke. “It’s a great group of guys.” On October 2, 1881, Father Michael J. McGivney called together a group of men to a church basement in New Haven, Connecticut. At that gathering, a pledge was made to form a fraternal order based on their devotion to their country, families and faith. A life insurance program was established by the founders to provide for widows and orphans of deceased members, which still exists to this day. Those wishing to join the KofC must be 18 years of age and be practicing Roman Catholics in union with the Holy See. Prospective applicants must accept the teaching authority of the Catholic Church on matters of faith and morals, strive to live in accordance with the Our Lady of Guadalupe celebration on January 26, 2012, featuring the Icon and the Knights of Columbus precepts of the Church, and be in good standing in the newly formed choir. Catholic Church. Not unlike the challenges the diocese currently faces in engaging youth to reconnect with their faith, so, recently, a new gathering of Knights is being established “I have a lot of family roots in that area,” explains too, are the KofC encountering hurdles in recruiting in Douglas via St.
  • Implementing a Digital Hub Strategy: Preservice Teacher and Faculty Perspectives

    Implementing a Digital Hub Strategy: Preservice Teacher and Faculty Perspectives

    Implementing a Digital Hub Strategy: Preservice Teacher and Faculty Perspectives Michelle Schira Hagerman and Jessica Coleman Abstract An education professor and a preservice teacher candidate describe their respective insights on the design and implementation of the first iteration of an open, web-based professional portfolio project. The student’s lived experience shows that for some, a Digital Hub can be a useful tool for curation, reflection, and networking; survey data suggests that not all students see value in this work, however. The pedagogical, programmatic, and research implications of this project are discussed. Background The English-language Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.)1 program at the University of Ottawa prepares preservice teacher candidates for professional certification by the Ontario College of Teachers (OCT). In line with professional standards for the teaching profession (OCT, 2017), the Faculty of Education offers a rigorous, research-based program of professional preparation that equips new teachers with adaptive expertise (Timperley, 2012) that includes knowledges, skills, and ways of thinking essential to the design of learning experiences for diverse learners in complex and ever-evolving contexts of schooling in this province (Ng-A-Fook, Kane, Crowe, Karagiozis, & Hagerman, 2017). Before 2015, the consecutive B.Ed. program at UOttawa was completed in a single academic year, but in the fall of that year, new legislative mandates required all of Ontario’s Bachelor of Education programs to become four-semester programs (Government of Ontario, 2016; Petrarca & Kitchen, 2017). One of the most challenging problems to address through the B.Ed. redesign in our Faculty has been how to create learning experiences at scale that will equip all candidates to teach with diverse digital technologies for diverse purposes within a broader programmatic framework of teacher inquiry for building adaptive expertise (Ng-A-Fook et al., 2017; Timperley, 2012).
  • NSSE16 Selected Comparison Groups (CBU).Xlsx

    NSSE16 Selected Comparison Groups (CBU).Xlsx

    NSSE 2016 Selected Comparison Groups Cape Breton University PSIS: 12003000 NSSE 2016 Selected Comparison Groups About This Report Comparison Groups The NSSE Institutional Report displays core survey results for your students alongside those of three comparison groups. In May, your institution was invited to customize these groups via a form on the Institution Interface. This report summarizes how your comparison groups were constructed and lists the institutions within them. NSSE comparison groups may be customized by (a) identifying specific institutions from the list of all 2015 and 2016 NSSE participants, (b) composing the group by selecting institutional characteristics, or (c) a combination of these. Institutions that chose not to customize received default groupsa that provide relevant comparisons for most institutions. Institutions that appended additional question sets in the form of topical modules or through consortium participation were also invited to customize comparison groups for those reports. The default for those groups was all other 2015 and 2016 institutions where the questions were administered. Please note: Comparison group details for topical module and consortium reports are documented separately in those reports. Your Students' Comparison Comparison Comparison Report Comparisons Responses Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Comparison groups are located in the institutional reports as illustrated in the mock report at right. In this example, the three groups are "GLC Peers," "Carnegie Peers," and "NSSE 2015 & 2016." Reading This Report This report consists of Comparison Group Name three sections that The name assigned to the provide details for each comparison group is listed here. of your comparison groups, illustrated at How Group was Constructed right.
  • Collège Boréal Presents First University Partners for Future Toronto Campus

    Collège Boréal Presents First University Partners for Future Toronto Campus

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Collège Boréal Presents First University Partners for Future Toronto Campus Tuesday, May 14, 2019 – Toronto – Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer (ONCAT) ▪ Today Collège Boréal presented the first group of partners who will contribute to the implementation of the pedagogical plan for its future campus in the Distillery District: Glendon College at York University, Laurentian University, Saint Paul University, the University of Ottawa, and the University of Moncton. ▪ Partnerships with these institutions will allow students enrolled in programs offered by Collège Boréal to pursue a University degree directly upon graduation from college. ▪ The intention is to offer these university programs at the new Collège Boréal campus at the Distillery District. The University of Moncton, because it is based outside Ontario, will be required to obtain legislative approvals prior to offering programs in this province. ▪ Other university partners will join Collège Boréal in the Distillery District. All programs offered on the future campus will be articulated with a university program. French-language and bilingual Canadian universities contribute to the construction of Collège Boréal’s new campus in Toronto. On Tuesday, May 14, 2019, the President of Collège Boréal, Daniel Giroux, and the presidents and representatives of Glendon College at York University, Laurentian University, Saint Paul University, the University of Ottawa, and the University of Moncton were present at the Ontario Council on Articulation and Transfer (ONCAT), which is responsible for the development of the student mobility system across the province, for the formal presentation of Collège Boréal’s first university partners. More flexibility and opportunities for students These partnerships will improve program offerings on campus: because their college credentials will be recognized by partner institutions, Collège Boréal students will have the option of pursuing a baccalaureate on site, at the Distillery District campus in Toronto.
  • UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report Synchronizing Sustaina

    UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report Synchronizing Sustaina

    UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report Synchronizing Sustainability Education Across Higher Education Community Orientations Kyle Sum University of British Columbia FNH 497 Themes: Climate, Community Date: Aug 31, 2020 Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student research project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore, readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Sustainability Program representative about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report”. 1 UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Sustainability Program Student Research Report Synchronizing Sustainability Education Across Higher Education Community Orientations Kyle Sum University of British Columbia FNH 497 Supervisor: Dr. Andrew Riseman August 31, 2020 Kyle would like to acknowledge the help from the following people and/or their respective institution for contributing their time and knowledge through interviews for the completion of this report: ASU; David Pereira, BCIT; James Gordon, TRU; UCalgary; Carrie Metzgar, UCI; and Brian Liechti, Warren Wilson. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS Sustainability Program provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well ​ as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student research project/report and is not an official document of UBC.
  • Engaging the Intersections of Equity and Technology in Teacher Education Instruction, Curriculum and Pedagogies Jamilee Baroud T

    Engaging the Intersections of Equity and Technology in Teacher Education Instruction, Curriculum and Pedagogies Jamilee Baroud T

    Running Head: ENGAGING THE INTERSECTIONS OF EQUITY AND TECHNOLOGY ENGAGING THE INTERSECTIONS OF EQUITY AND TECHNOLOGY IN TEACHER EDUCATION INSTRUCTION, CURRICULUM AND PEDAGOGIES JAMILEE BAROUD Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy Degree in Education Faculty of Education University of Ottawa © Jamilee Baroud, Ottawa, Canada, 2020 ENGAGING THE INTETERSECTIONS OF EQUITY AND TECHNOLOGY ii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................ vi Research Questions ................................................................................................................................. 3 Provincial Context: Definitions of Digital Literacy.............................................................................. 4 British Columbia. .................................................................................................................................. 4 Ontario. ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter Summary ................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter Two: Literature Review ...............................................................................................