DOCSLIB.ORG

Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry Undergraduate Algebraic Geometry Miles Reid Math Inst., University of Warwick, 1st preprint edition, Oct 1985 2nd preprint edition, Jan 1988, LMS Student Texts 12, C.U.P., Cambridge 1988 2nd corrected printing, Oct 1989 first TeX edition, Jan 2007 October 20, 2013 4 Preface There are several good recent textbooks on algebraic geometry at the graduate level, but not (to my knowledge) any designed for an undergraduate course. Humble notes are from a course given in two successive years in the 3rd year of the Warwick under- graduate math course, and are intended as a self-contained introductory textbook. Contents 0 Woffle 11 0.1 What it’s about . 11 0.2 Specific calculations versus general theory . 12 0.3 Rings of functions and categories of geometry . 12 0.4 Geometry from polynomials . 13 0.5 “Purely algebraically defined” . 14 0.6 Plan of the book . 14 Course prerequisites . 15 Course relates to . 15 Exercises to Chapter 0 . 15 Books ............................................ 16 I Playing with plane curves 17 1 Plane conics 19 1.1 Example of a parametrised curve . 19 1.2 Similar example . 20 1.3 Conics in R2 ........................................ 21 1.4 Projective plane . 21 1.5 Equation of a conic . 23 ‘Line at infinity’ and asymptotic directions . 23 1.6 Classification of conics in P2 ................................ 24 1.7 Parametrisation of a conic . 25 1.8 Homogeneous form in 2 variables . 25 1.9 Easy cases of Bézout’s Theorem . 26 1.10 Corollary: unique conic through 5 general points of P2 . 27 1.11 Space of all conics . 28 1.12 Intersection of two conics . 29 1.13 Degenerate conics in a pencil . 30 1.14 Worked example . 30 Exercises to Chapter 1 . 32 5 6 CONTENTS 2 Cubics and the group law 35 2.1 Examples of parametrised cubics . 35 2.2 The curve (y2 = x(x − 1)(x − λ)) has no rational parametrisation . 36 2.3 Lemma . 37 2.4 Linear systems . 37 2.5 Lemma: divisibility by L or by Q ............................. 38 2.6 Proposition: cubics through 8 general points form a pencil . 39 2.7 Corollary: cubic through 8 points C1 \ C2 pass through the 9th . 40 2.8 Group law on a plane cubic . 40 2.9 Associativity “in general” . 42 2.10 Proof by continuity . 42 2.11 Pascal’s Theorem (the mystic hexagon) . 43 2.12 Inflexion, normal form . 44 2.13 Simplified group law . 45 Exercises to Chapter 2 . 46 2.14 Topology of a nonsingular cubic . 49 2.15 Discussion of genus . 51 2.16 Commercial break . 51 II The category of affine varieties 55 3 Affine varieties and the Nullstellensatz 57 3.1 Definition of Noetherian ring . 57 3.2 Proposition: Noetherian passes to quotients and rings of fractions . 58 3.3 Hilbert Basis Theorem . 58 3.4 The correspondence V ................................... 59 3.5 Definition: the Zariski topology . 59 3.6 The correspondence I ................................... 60 3.7 Irreducible algebraic set . 61 3.8 Preparation for the Nullstellensatz . 62 3.9 Definition: radical ideal . 62 3.11 Worked examples . 64 3.12 Finite algebras . 65 3.13 Noether normalisation . 66 3.14 Remarks . 68 3.15 Proof of (3.8) . 68 3.16 Separable addendum . 68 3.17 Reduction to a hypersurface . 69 Exercises to Chapter 3 . 70 4 Functions on varieties 73 4.1 Polynomial functions . 73 4.2 k[V ] and algebraic subsets of V .............................. 73 4.3 Polynomial maps . 74 4.4 Polynomial maps and k[V ] ................................. 75 CONTENTS 7 4.5 Corollary: f : V ! W is an isomorphism if and only if f ∗ is . 76 4.6 Affine variety . 77 4.7 Function field . 77 4.8 Criterion for dom f = V for f 2 k(V ) ........................... 78 4.9 Rational maps . 78 4.10 Composition of rational maps . 79 4.11 Theorem: dominant rational maps . 79 4.12 Morphisms from an open subset of an affine variety . 79 4.13 Standard open subsets . 80 4.14 Worked example . 81 Exercises to Chapter 4 . 82 III Applications 85 5 Projective and birational geometry 87 5.0 Why projective varieties? . 87 5.1 Graded rings and homogeneous ideals . 88 5.2 The homogeneous V -I correspondences . 89 5.3 Projective Nullstellensatz . 89 5.4 Rational functions on V .................................. 90 5.5 Affine covering of a projective variety . 91 5.6 Rational maps and morphisms . 92 5.7 Examples . 93 5.8 Birational maps . 94 5.9 Rational varieties . 95 5.10 Reduction to a hypersurface . 95 5.11 Products . 95 Exercises to Chapter 5 . 96 6 Tangent space and nonsingularity, dimension 101 6.1 Nonsingular points of a hypersurface . 101 6.2 Remarks . 102 6.3 Proposition: V nonsing is dense . 102 6.4 Tangent space . 103 6.5 Proposition: dim TP V is upper semicontinuous . 103 6.6 Corollary–Definition: dim TP V = dim V on a dense open set . 103 6.7 dim V = tr deg k(V ) – the hypersurface case . 104 6.8 Intrinsic nature of TP V ..................................104 6.9 Corollary: TP V only depends on P 2 V up to isomorphism . 105 6.10 Theorem: dim V = tr deg k(V ) ..............................106 6.11 Nonsingularity and projective varieties . 106 6.12 Worked example: blowup . 106 Exercises to Chapter 6 . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE CUBIC THREEFOLD and FRIENDS 1. Background On
    THE CUBIC THREEFOLD AND FRIENDS 1. Background on Threefolds Fano, around the 1910s, proved that any smooth quartic threefold • is not rational. Later on, in the 1950s, Roth criticised the proof as incomplete. In 1971, Iskovskikh and Manin provide a complete proof. In 1972, Artin and Mumford gave an example of another unirational, • but not rational Fano threefold. This is a certain double cover X of P3 ramified over a singular quartic surface. They showed that H3(X; Z) is a birational invariant and obtained that H3(X; Z) = Z2, from which they concluded that X cannot be rational. At the same time, Clemens and Griffiths showed that any smooth • cubic threefold V over a field of characteristic zero is unirational, but not rational. In the same year, Murre proved the result in char- acteristic p. The idea of Clemens and Griffiths was to consider two auxiliary varieties of a smooth cubic threefold V: The intermediate Jacobian J(V) - a principally polarised abelian variety • playing a role similar to that of the Jacobian for studying divisors on curves. the Fano variety of lines F(V) - a smooth projective surface parametris- • ing lines on V. In order to arrive at the result, they represented J(V) as the Albanese variety of F(V), and studied its theta divisors. 2. The Cohomology of the Cubic Threefold As before, let V be a cubic threefold, i.e. a hypersurface of degree three in P4. A first idea is to compare the cohomology of V with that of P3 and hope that we shall thus find a birational invariant that has different values for V and P3, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Kernelization of the Subset General Position Problem in Geometry Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, Kunal Dutta, Arijit Ghosh, Sudeshna Kolay
    Kernelization of the Subset General Position problem in Geometry Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, Kunal Dutta, Arijit Ghosh, Sudeshna Kolay To cite this version: Jean-Daniel Boissonnat, Kunal Dutta, Arijit Ghosh, Sudeshna Kolay. Kernelization of the Subset General Position problem in Geometry. MFCS 2017 - 42nd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, Aug 2017, Alborg, Denmark. 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2017.25. hal-01583101 HAL Id: hal-01583101 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01583101 Submitted on 6 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Kernelization of the Subset General Position problem in Geometry Jean-Daniel Boissonnat1, Kunal Dutta1, Arijit Ghosh2, and Sudeshna Kolay3 1 INRIA Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée, France 2 Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India 3 Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands. Abstract In this paper, we consider variants of the Geometric Subset General Position problem. In defining this problem, a geometric subsystem is specified, like a subsystem of lines, hyperplanes or spheres. The input of the problem is a set of n points in Rd and a positive integer k. The objective is to find a subset of at least k input points such that this subset is in general position with respect to the specified subsystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Moduli Spaces of Quadratic Rational Maps with a Marked Periodic Point
    J. Blanc et al. (2015) “Quadratic Maps with a Marked Periodic Point of Small Order,” International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 2015, No. 23, pp. 12459–12489 Advance Access Publication March 10, 2015 doi:10.1093/imrn/rnv063 Moduli Spaces of Quadratic Rational Maps with a Marked Periodic Point of Small Order Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/imrn/article/2015/23/12459/672405 by guest on 27 September 2021 Jer´ emy´ Blanc1, Jung Kyu Canci1, and Noam D. Elkies2 1Mathematisches Institut, Universitat¨ Basel, Spiegelgasse 1, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland and 2Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Correspondence to be sent to: [email protected] The surface corresponding to the moduli space of quadratic endomorphisms of P1 with a marked periodic point of order nis studied. It is shown that the surface is rational over Q when n≤ 5 and is of general type for n= 6. An explicit description of the n= 6 surface lets us find several infinite families of quadratic endomorphisms f : P1 → P1 defined over Q with a rational periodic point of order 6. In one of these families, f also has a rational fixed point, for a total of at least 7 periodic and 7 preperiodic points. This is in contrast with the polynomial case, where it is conjectured that no polynomial endomorphism defined over Q admits rational periodic points of order n> 3. 1 Introduction A classical question in arithmetic dynamics concerns periodic, and more generally preperiodic, points of a rational map (endomorphism) f : P1(Q) → P1(Q).Apointp is said to be periodic of order n if f n(p) = p and if f i(p) = p for 0 < i < n.Apointp is said to be preperiodic if there exists a non-negative integer m such that the point f m(p) is periodic.
    [Show full text]
  • Homology Stratifications and Intersection Homology 1 Introduction
    ISSN 1464-8997 (on line) 1464-8989 (printed) 455 Geometry & Topology Monographs Volume 2: Proceedings of the Kirbyfest Pages 455–472 Homology stratifications and intersection homology Colin Rourke Brian Sanderson Abstract A homology stratification is a filtered space with local ho- mology groups constant on strata. Despite being used by Goresky and MacPherson [3] in their proof of topological invariance of intersection ho- mology, homology stratifications do not appear to have been studied in any detail and their properties remain obscure. Here we use them to present a simplified version of the Goresky–MacPherson proof valid for PL spaces, and we ask a number of questions. The proof uses a new technique, homology general position, which sheds light on the (open) problem of defining generalised intersection homology. AMS Classification 55N33, 57Q25, 57Q65; 18G35, 18G60, 54E20, 55N10, 57N80, 57P05 Keywords Permutation homology, intersection homology, homology stratification, homology general position Rob Kirby has been a great source of encouragement. His help in founding the new electronic journal Geometry & Topology has been invaluable. It is a great pleasure to dedicate this paper to him. 1 Introduction Homology stratifications are filtered spaces with local homology groups constant on strata; they include stratified sets as special cases. Despite being used by Goresky and MacPherson [3] in their proof of topological invariance of intersec- tion homology, they do not appear to have been studied in any detail and their properties remain obscure. It is the purpose of this paper is to publicise these neglected but powerful tools. The main result is that the intersection homology groups of a PL homology stratification are given by singular cycles meeting the strata with appropriate dimension restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Algebraic Geometry Michael Stoll
    Introductory Geometry Course No. 100 351 Fall 2005 Second Part: Algebraic Geometry Michael Stoll Contents 1. What Is Algebraic Geometry? 2 2. Affine Spaces and Algebraic Sets 3 3. Projective Spaces and Algebraic Sets 6 4. Projective Closure and Affine Patches 9 5. Morphisms and Rational Maps 11 6. Curves — Local Properties 14 7. B´ezout’sTheorem 18 2 1. What Is Algebraic Geometry? Linear Algebra can be seen (in parts at least) as the study of systems of linear equations. In geometric terms, this can be interpreted as the study of linear (or affine) subspaces of Cn (say). Algebraic Geometry generalizes this in a natural way be looking at systems of polynomial equations. Their geometric realizations (their solution sets in Cn, say) are called algebraic varieties. Many questions one can study in various parts of mathematics lead in a natural way to (systems of) polynomial equations, to which the methods of Algebraic Geometry can be applied. Algebraic Geometry provides a translation between algebra (solutions of equations) and geometry (points on algebraic varieties). The methods are mostly algebraic, but the geometry provides the intuition. Compared to Differential Geometry, in Algebraic Geometry we consider a rather restricted class of “manifolds” — those given by polynomial equations (we can allow “singularities”, however). For example, y = cos x defines a perfectly nice differentiable curve in the plane, but not an algebraic curve. In return, we can get stronger results, for example a criterion for the existence of solutions (in the complex numbers), or statements on the number of solutions (for example when intersecting two curves), or classification results.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Affine Varieties
    1 Affine Varieties We will begin following Kempf's Algebraic Varieties, and eventually will do things more like in Hartshorne. We will also use various sources for commutative algebra. What is algebraic geometry? Classically, it is the study of the zero sets of polynomials. We will now fix some notation. k will be some fixed algebraically closed field, any ring is commutative with identity, ring homomorphisms preserve identity, and a k-algebra is a ring R which contains k (i.e., we have a ring homomorphism ι : k ! R). P ⊆ R an ideal is prime iff R=P is an integral domain. Algebraic Sets n n We define affine n-space, A = k = f(a1; : : : ; an): ai 2 kg. n Any f = f(x1; : : : ; xn) 2 k[x1; : : : ; xn] defines a function f : A ! k : (a1; : : : ; an) 7! f(a1; : : : ; an). Exercise If f; g 2 k[x1; : : : ; xn] define the same function then f = g as polynomials. Definition 1.1 (Algebraic Sets). Let S ⊆ k[x1; : : : ; xn] be any subset. Then V (S) = fa 2 An : f(a) = 0 for all f 2 Sg. A subset of An is called algebraic if it is of this form. e.g., a point f(a1; : : : ; an)g = V (x1 − a1; : : : ; xn − an). Exercises 1. I = (S) is the ideal generated by S. Then V (S) = V (I). 2. I ⊆ J ) V (J) ⊆ V (I). P 3. V ([αIα) = V ( Iα) = \V (Iα). 4. V (I \ J) = V (I · J) = V (I) [ V (J). Definition 1.2 (Zariski Topology). We can define a topology on An by defining the closed subsets to be the algebraic subsets.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymptotic Behavior of the Length of Local Cohomology
    ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF THE LENGTH OF LOCAL COHOMOLOGY STEVEN DALE CUTKOSKY, HUY TAI` HA,` HEMA SRINIVASAN, AND EMANOIL THEODORESCU Abstract. Let k be a field of characteristic 0, R = k[x1, . , xd] be a polynomial ring, and m its maximal homogeneous ideal. Let I ⊂ R be a homogeneous ideal in R. In this paper, we show that λ(H0 (R/In)) λ(Extd (R/In,R(−d))) lim m = lim R n→∞ nd n→∞ nd e(I) always exists. This limit has been shown to be for m-primary ideals I in a local Cohen Macaulay d! ring [Ki, Th, Th2], where e(I) denotes the multiplicity of I. But we find that this limit may not be rational in general. We give an example for which the limit is an irrational number thereby showing that the lengths of these extention modules may not have polynomial growth. Introduction Let R = k[x1, . , xd] be a polynomial ring over a field k, with graded maximal ideal m, and I ⊂ R d n a proper homogeneous ideal. We investigate the asymptotic growth of λ(ExtR(R/I ,R)) as a function of n. When R is a local Gorenstein ring and I is an m-primary ideal, then this is easily seen to be equal to λ(R/In) and hence is a polynomial in n. A theorem of Theodorescu and Kirby [Ki, Th, Th2] extends this to m-primary ideals in local Cohen Macaulay rings R. We consider homogeneous ideals in a polynomial ring which are not m-primary and show that a limit exists asymptotically although it can be irrational.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpolation
    Current Developments in Algebraic Geometry MSRI Publications Volume 59, 2011 Interpolation JOE HARRIS This is an overview of interpolation problems: when, and how, do zero- dimensional schemes in projective space fail to impose independent conditions on hypersurfaces? 1. The interpolation problem 165 2. Reduced schemes 167 3. Fat points 170 4. Recasting the problem 174 References 175 1. The interpolation problem We give an overview of the exciting class of problems in algebraic geometry known as interpolation problems: basically, when points (or more generally zero-dimensional schemes) in projective space may fail to impose independent conditions on polynomials of a given degree, and by how much. We work over an arbitrary field K . Our starting point is this elementary theorem: Theorem 1.1. Given any z1;::: zdC1 2 K and a1;::: adC1 2 K , there is a unique f 2 K TzU of degree at most d such that f .zi / D ai ; i D 1;:::; d C 1: More generally: Theorem 1.2. Given any z1;:::; zk 2 K , natural numbers m1;:::; mk 2 N with P mi D d C 1, and ai; j 2 K; 1 ≤ i ≤ kI 0 ≤ j ≤ mi − 1; there is a unique f 2 K TzU of degree at most d such that . j/ f .zi / D ai; j for all i; j: The problem we’ll address here is simple: What can we say along the same lines for polynomials in several variables? 165 166 JOE HARRIS First, introduce some language/notation. The “starting point” statement Theorem 1.1 says that the evaluation map 0 ! L H .ᏻP1 .d// K pi is surjective; or, equivalently, 1 D h .Ᏽfp1;:::;peg.d// 0 1 for any distinct points p1;:::; pe 2 P whenever e ≤ d C 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1703.06832V3 [Math.AC]
    REGULARITY OF FI-MODULES AND LOCAL COHOMOLOGY ROHIT NAGPAL, STEVEN V SAM, AND ANDREW SNOWDEN Abstract. We resolve a conjecture of Ramos and Li that relates the regularity of an FI- module to its local cohomology groups. This is an analogue of the familiar relationship between regularity and local cohomology in commutative algebra. 1. Introduction Let S be a standard-graded polynomial ring in finitely many variables over a field k, and let M be a non-zero finitely generated graded S-module. It is a classical fact in commutative algebra that the following two quantities are equal (see [Ei, §4B]): S • The minimum integer α such that Tori (M, k) is supported in degrees ≤ α + i for all i. i • The minimum integer β such that Hm(M) is supported in degrees ≤ β − i for all i. i Here Hm is local cohomology at the irrelevant ideal m. The quantity α = β is called the (Castelnuovo–Mumford) regularity of M, and is one of the most important numerical invariants of M. In this paper, we establish the analog of the α = β identity for FI-modules. To state our result precisely, we must recall some definitions. Let FI be the category of finite sets and injections. Fix a commutative noetherian ring k. An FI-module over k is a functor from FI to the category of k-modules. We write ModFI for the category of FI-modules. We refer to [CEF] for a general introduction to FI-modules. Let M be an FI-module. Define Tor0(M) to be the FI-module that assigns to S the quotient of M(S) by the sum of the images of the M(T ), as T varies over all proper subsets of S.
    [Show full text]
  • RATIONAL HOMOGENEOUS VARIETIES Giorgio Ottaviani
    RATIONAL HOMOGENEOUS VARIETIES Giorgio Ottaviani Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adell'Aquila Current address: Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adi Firenze viale Morgagni 67/A 50134 FIRENZE [email protected]fi.it x1. Introduction page 1 x2. Grassmannians and flag varieties 5 x3. Lie algebras and Lie groups 9 x4. The Borel fixed point theorem 18 x5. SL(2) 22 x6. The Cartan decomposition 26 x7. Borel and parabolic subgroups 37 x8. ABC about bundles 40 x9. Homogeneous bundles 47 x10. The theorem of Borel-Weil 51 x11. The theorem of Bott 61 x12. Stability of homogeneous bundles 65 References 69 These notes have been written for distribution to the participants to the summer school in Algebraic Geometry organized by the Scuola Matematica Universitaria in Cortona in the period 13-26 August 1995. The aim was to describe the classification of rational homogeneous varieties and to provide the theorems of Borel-Weil and Bott. Lie algebras are introduced starting from the definition and they are studied as far as it is necessary for the aim. At the other side, the knowledge of basic techniques of algebraic geometry (as sheaf cohomology) and algebraic topology was assumed. I learned most of the material of these notes from many lectures and discussions with Vincenzo Ancona and Alan Huckleberry. I am sincerely grateful to both of them and also to all the participants to the course in Cortona, especially to Raffaella Paoletti and Anke Simon for careful proofreading and for their suggestions. x1. Introduction An algebraic variety is a quasiprojective variety over the field C of complex numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Complex Analytic Geometry
    version: February 24, 2012 (revised and corrected) Topics in Complex Analytic Geometry by Janusz Adamus Lecture Notes PART II Department of Mathematics The University of Western Ontario c Copyright by Janusz Adamus (2007-2012) 2 Janusz Adamus Contents 1 Analytic tensor product and fibre product of analytic spaces 5 2 Rank and fibre dimension of analytic mappings 8 3 Vertical components and effective openness criterion 17 4 Flatness in complex analytic geometry 24 5 Auslander-type effective flatness criterion 31 This document was typeset using AMS-LATEX. Topics in Complex Analytic Geometry - Math 9607/9608 3 References [I] J. Adamus, Complex analytic geometry, Lecture notes Part I (2008). [A1] J. Adamus, Natural bound in Kwieci´nski'scriterion for flatness, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130, No.11 (2002), 3165{3170. [A2] J. Adamus, Vertical components in fibre powers of analytic spaces, J. Algebra 272 (2004), no. 1, 394{403. [A3] J. Adamus, Vertical components and flatness of Nash mappings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 193 (2004), 1{9. [A4] J. Adamus, Flatness testing and torsion freeness of analytic tensor powers, J. Algebra 289 (2005), no. 1, 148{160. [ABM1] J. Adamus, E. Bierstone, P. D. Milman, Uniform linear bound in Chevalley's lemma, Canad. J. Math. 60 (2008), no.4, 721{733. [ABM2] J. Adamus, E. Bierstone, P. D. Milman, Geometric Auslander criterion for flatness, to appear in Amer. J. Math. [ABM3] J. Adamus, E. Bierstone, P. D. Milman, Geometric Auslander criterion for openness of an algebraic morphism, preprint (arXiv:1006.1872v1). [Au] M. Auslander, Modules over unramified regular local rings, Illinois J.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Algebraic Geometry
    PHYLOGENETIC ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY NICHOLAS ERIKSSON, KRISTIAN RANESTAD, BERND STURMFELS, AND SETH SULLIVANT Abstract. Phylogenetic algebraic geometry is concerned with certain complex projec- tive algebraic varieties derived from finite trees. Real positive points on these varieties represent probabilistic models of evolution. For small trees, we recover classical geometric objects, such as toric and determinantal varieties and their secant varieties, but larger trees lead to new and largely unexplored territory. This paper gives a self-contained introduction to this subject and offers numerous open problems for algebraic geometers. 1. Introduction Our title is meant as a reference to the existing branch of mathematical biology which is known as phylogenetic combinatorics. By “phylogenetic algebraic geometry” we mean the study of algebraic varieties which represent statistical models of evolution. For general background reading on phylogenetics we recommend the books by Felsenstein [11] and Semple-Steel [21]. They provide an excellent introduction to evolutionary trees, from the perspectives of biology, computer science, statistics and mathematics. They also offer numerous references to relevant papers, in addition to the more recent ones listed below. Phylogenetic algebraic geometry furnishes a rich source of interesting varieties, includ- ing familiar ones such as toric varieties, secant varieties and determinantal varieties. But these are very special cases, and one quickly encounters a cornucopia of new varieties. The objective of this paper is to give an introduction to this subject area, aimed at students and researchers in algebraic geometry, and to suggest some concrete research problems. The basic object in a phylogenetic model is a tree T which is rooted and has n labeled leaves.
    [Show full text]