Litoria Aurea)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Litoria Aurea) Phylogeography, Population History and Conservation Genetics of the Endangered Green and Golden Bell Frog (Litoria aurea) Emma Louise Burns Ph.D. School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales December 2004 For Ben …without you this would never have been possible. I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and to the best of my knowledge it contains no material previously published or written by an other person, nor material which to a substantial extend has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma at UNSW or any other education institution, except where due acknowledgement is made in this thesis. Any contribution made to the research by other, with whom I have worked at UNSW or elsewhere, is explicitly acknowledged in the thesis. I also declare that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work, except to the extent that assistance from others in the project’s design and conception or in style, presentation and linguistic expression is acknowledged. Signed: Emma Burns Preface This thesis consists of four stand-alone papers (chapters two to five) that have been published, submitted, or prepared for submission, to international journals of high standing. The publication details of each paper and the contribution of co-authors are detailed at the end of each chapter. To prevent unnecessary duplication a single reference list is provided at the end of the thesis. Chapter one, a general introductory chapter, describes the study species (Litoria aurea) and provides background information on conservation genetics. Chapter two provides a description of the isolation and characterisation of microsatellite markers, which are employed in chapter three. Chapter three provides a detailed examination of the genetic variability and population structure in L. aurea using microsatellite markers. Chapter four, examines the concept of a ‘bell frog species group’ using mitochondrial DNA and tests for the sister taxon to L. aurea, to use as an out group taxon for analyses in the proceeding chapter. Chapter five examines the intraspecific phylogeography of L. aurea using mitchonchondrial DNA. The concluding chapter, chapter six, provides a synthesis of the preceding chapters and a discussion of the conservation management of L. aurea based on the findings of this study. i Acknowledgements This has been a long journey and there are numerous people that I need to acknowledge and thank. Firstly, I would like to thank my husband Ben Noyen whose constant support and encouragement has made getting to the finish line a reality. Ben, for all the times I contemplated giving up when the obstacles just seemed too big, thank you for talking me out of it! To my family, Mum, Dad, Fiona, Ashley and Steve, thank you for all your support and for not giving up on me. You never once encouraged me to walk away and that was what I needed. Mum, thanks for the company, fun and great frog catching on the Victorian field trip. You are wonderful. To the Noyen family, Jo, Di, Summa and Jason, thank you for your support. I know at times you found it difficult to understand why I needed to finish this when it all seemed too hard but thank you for understanding. Summa, thanks for your help formatting and Jas thanks for letting me use your wiz bang computer in the dying days, it made life that little bit easier. To my old boss at AMBS, Jayne Tipping and my current supervisor Kerry Doyle at MSMR, a huge thank you to you both. Working full time for the last two and a half years whilst trying to complete my thesis has been made easier with your support. Now, moving on to the many people who have helped make this project happen. Starting at the beginning, to my initial supervisor Bronwyn Houlden, thank you for inspiring me to do ii research. Your commitment to me during this journey has made this all possible. Though I thought my world was slipping away when you first left UNSW, it did not happen. Thank you for continuing to read manuscripts and provide advice after you left. Rob Brooks, thank you for ‘adopting me’ and taking on my supervision. You have been fantastic and thank you for always encouraging me to “just get it done”. Your faith in me helped make this a reality, and your support made sure I did not “slip through the cracks”. Now to my two saving ‘knights’, Mark Eldridge and Darren Crayn, without your help mid way through the game, the end would of never been achievable. Thank you for helping me complete my thesis and manuscripts and Darren without you I am sure PAUP and I would never have gotten along! A special thank you to Bill Sherwin whose door was always open to me and Jo Zuccarello who is a complete wiz in the lab and was always ready to help and listen. A big thanks also to Hal Cogger for providing the title page photo and for all the talks and support you gave me during our habitat inspections etc at Sydney Olympic Park whilst I worked at AMBS. A special mention now for my fellow students who made this journey so fun; Meg, Ange, Shaun, Michael, Deirdre and Megan, you guys are great. I have not only achieved a degree (and hopefully a career) through this process but I have also made life long friends. Also a big, big thank you to all those who helped with field work and sample collection. A project of this magnitude could not succeed without the help of numerous people in the field and there are heaps of people to thank. I would like to start with a very special thank iii you to Ross Wellington and Arthur White, both of you made yourselves readily available to me and shared your knowledge of the green and golden bell frog which enabled me to plan successful field trips, well mostly, but it is an endangered species so I shan’t complain. I would also like to thank Graham Pyke, Garry Daly, Andrew Hamer, Simon Lane, Mike Mahony, Rod Pietsch, Graeme Gillespie, John Clulow, Scott Filmer, Rebecca Rudd, Candice Webb, Dion Hobcroft, Kerry Darcovich, Glenn Muir and many field volunteers and property owners for aid in the collection of tissue samples. All of you helped make this project happen, thank you. Thank you, Steve Donnellan and Terry Bertozzi of the South Australian Museum and Denis O’Meally and Don Colgan of the Australian Museum for providing tissue from their collections for Chapter four. Steve Donnellan was also generous enough to review an earlier draft of chapter four and provide helpful comments, thank you. A special thank you to Alaxandra Schulmeister and Gianfrancesco Ferrari for their volunteer work in the laboratory. Francesco, it was a joy spending time with you and I dearly hope we get to meet again. Thank you Eli Geffen for advice with some statistical analysis in Chapter three and Eric Harley for supplying the program AGARst. Finally, on a more official note, this project could never have happened without financial support from an Australian Postgraduate Research Award and the following sources: University of New South Wales-URSP, ARC small grant, Zoological Parks Board of New South Wales, Roads and Traffic Authority, National Parks and Wildlife Service, Mary Ethel Read Research Grant, the Joyce W. Vickery Scientific Research Fund, and the W.V. iv Scott Foundation. Also, this study was conducted under University of New South Wales Animal Care and Ethics Committee approval (ACEC 99/39), Zoological Parks Board of NSW approval (ACEC 3a/06/99), New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service scientific permits (A2608, B2022), State Forests of New South Wales special purpose permit (05449) and Victorian Department of Natural Resources and Environment scientific permit (10000851). v Table of Contents PREFACE............................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ II LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................X LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................XIII THESIS ABSTRACT.............................................................................................................XV CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION.......... 1 STUDY SPECIES ................................................................................................................... 1 Species description ......................................................................................................... 1 Species history and conservation status......................................................................... 4 CONSERVATION GENETICS .................................................................................................. 7 Previous molecular studies of frogs ............................................................................... 9 THESIS OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER TWO: ISOLATION AND CHARACTERISATION OF MICROSATELLITE LOCI IN THE GREEN AND GOLDEN BELL FROG (LITORIA AUREA)............................................................................................................. 12 ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................... 12 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Phylogeography of the American Green Treefrog Species Group
    PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE AMERICAN GREEN TREEFROG SPECIES GROUP by PAUL NATHANIEL PASICHNYK Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON November 2016 Copyright © by Paul N. Pasichnyk 2016 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgments A student’s graduate work is definitely not something that is done alone. I have received help from numerous people over the years and without their contributions, this would not have been possible. First, I would like to thank my parents for their tremendous support and motivation as I grew up and provided me with a foundation and love in education. Secondly, I would like to thank the person who has had to help me daily with tasks as simple as a pat on the back to as complex as reading a rough draft of a dissertation that might as well be in a foreign language, my wife Karen. My in-laws deserve special thanks as well, I do not believe that it is possible for others’ in-laws to be as supportive and helpful as mine. Then I would like to thank all the undergrads and friends who have helped see this to completion: Richard Hanna, Sari Mahon, Sarah Young, Nicole Lopez, Annamarie Slaven, Leslie Segovia, Pankaj BC, Matt Moseley, Christian Cox, Jeff Streicher, Claudia Marquez, Jesse Meik, Walter Schargel, Corey Roelke, Matt Watson, Rebbekah Watson, Thomas Eimermacher, Utpal Smart, David Sanchez, Jacobo Reyes-Velasco, Melissa Muenzler, Carl Franklin, Linda Taylor, Gloria Burlingham, Sherri Echols, and Paulette Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Eocene Frogs from Vastan Lignite Mine, Gujarat, India
    Early Eocene frogs from Vastan Lignite Mine, Gujarat, India ANNELISE FOLIE, RAJENDRA S. RANA, KENNETH D. ROSE, ASHOK SAHNI, KISHOR KUMAR, LACHHAM SINGH, and THIERRY SMITH Folie, A., Rana, R.S., Rose, K.D., Sahni, A., Kumar, K., Singh, L., and Smith, T. 2013. Early Eocene frogs from Vastan Lignite Mine, Gujarat, India. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58 (3): 511–524. The Ypresian Cambay Shale Formation of Vastan Lignite Mine in Gujarat, western India, has yielded a rich vertebrate fauna, including the earliest modern mammals of the Indian subcontinent. Here we describe its assemblage of four frogs, including two new genera and species, based on numerous, diverse and well−preserved ilia and vertebrae. An abundant frog, Eobarbourula delfinoi gen. and sp. nov., with a particular vertebral articulation similar to a zygosphene−zygantrum complex, represents the oldest record of the Bombinatoridae and might have been capable of displaying the Unken reflex. The large non−fossorial pelobatid Eopelobates, known from complete skeletons from the Eocene and Oligocene of Europe, is also identified at Vastan based on a single nearly complete ilium. An abundant “ranid” and a possible rhacophorid Indorana prasadi gen. and sp. nov. represent the earliest records of both families. The Vastan pelobatids and ranids confirm an early worldwide distribution of these families, and the bombinatorids and rhacophorids show possible origins of those clades on the Indian subcontinent. Key words: Amphibia, Bombinatoridae, Ranidae, Pelobatidae, Rhacophoridae, Eocene, Vastan, India. Annelise Folie [[email protected]] and Thierry Smith [[email protected]], Royal Bel− gian Institute of Natural Sciences, Department of Paleontology, Rue Vautier 29, B−1000 Brussels, Belgium; Rajendra S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Amphibians As
    CHAPTER EIGHT AMPHIBIA 8.1 The amphibian fauna of south central Seram The amphibian fauna of Seram is still imperfectly understood, despite the efforts of those working on various aspects of Moluccan natural history in the first half of the present century [Rubenkoning, 1959: ii]. Even Rum- phius, who in other respects was a notable pioneer of Moluccan zoology, seems to have paid little attention to it [Greshoff, 1902; Wit, (ed.) 1959]. Frogs are the only amphibians known from the Moluccas. Of more than 20 Anuran families recognised, only three seem to occur on Seram. Prior to 1969, six species had been reported: Rana grisea ceramensis and Pla- tymantis papuensis from the family Ranidae, Phrynomantis fusca from the family Microhylidae, Litoria infrafrenata infrafrenata, L. amboinensis, and L. vagabunda from the family Pelodryadidae. All of these were obtained between 1970 and 1975 in the south central part of the island, with the exception of Rana grisea and L. vagabunda. R. grisea ceramensis is known only from a single specimen collected in central Seram at about 1000 m in 1919, while L. vagabunda is also rare, being known from only two speci- mens, collected in 1872, one from Seram and one from New Guinea. In addition, Rana modesta was found (previously unknown from Seram), plus two hitherto biologically undescribed species: Litoria sp. (bicolor group) and Rana sp. The species most commonly encountered by the Nuaulu is Litoria infrafrenata, a noisy green tree frog common in coastal and village areas and among the largest of its kind. This frog, however, has a wide altitudinal dis- tribution, certainly occurring at 700 m, and possibly higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Diversity the Origin and Evolution of Amphibians
    Amphibian Diversity The Origin and Evolution of Amphibians • The three living groups of amphibians are descended from a diverse group of tetrapods that first appeared in the Devonian Period, about 400 million years ago • The ancient continents were uniting into a single large landmass, Pangaea, much of which was situated in tropical or subtropical latitudes. • The climate is assumed to have been relatively warm and equable for terrestrial life. Land communities were characterized by assemblages of relatively primitive plants and arthropods. Phylogeny of Devonian tetrapods Phylogeny of Devonian tetrapods, with diagrammatic representations of skull structure of major clades. Ichthyostega is considered the sister group to the later tetrapods. The Origin of Modern Amphibians Alternative phylogenetic hypotheses for the relationships of lissamphibians, amniotes, and early tetrapods. (A)Traditional hypothesis showing lissamphibians related to temnospondyls. (B) Hypothesis of Laurin and Reisz (1997), showing lissamphibians related to lepospondyls and to microsaurs in particular. General Characteristics of Living Amphibians • Three major groups of amphibians are very different : 1. Frogs and toads (order Anura) : specialized for jumping, with greatly enlarged hind legs, shortened bodies, no tail, and large heads and eyes. 2. Salamanders and newts (order Urodela): more elongate, with front and back legs of approximately equal size and a long tail (this clade is called Caudata by some systematists, derived from the Latin rather than the Greek word for “tail”). 3. Caecilians (order Gymnophiona) : specialized for life underground. They have elongated, snakelike bodies that lack legs, and they have greatly reduced eyes. Reconstructions of The Earliest Anuran and Caecilian Fossils (A) Triadobatrachus massinoti, a froglike amphibian from an early Triassic deposit in Madagascar.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Evolution Across the Australian Continent: Ecotype Diversification Drives Morphological Convergence in Two Distantly Related Clades of Australian Frogs
    doi: 10.1111/jeb.12746 Convergent evolution across the Australian continent: ecotype diversification drives morphological convergence in two distantly related clades of Australian frogs M. VIDAL-GARCIA & J. S. KEOGH Evolution, Ecology & Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia Keywords: Abstract amphibian; Animals from different clades but subject to similar environments often anura; evolve similar body shapes and physiological adaptations due to convergent Australia; evolution, but this has been rarely tested at the transcontinental level and burrowing; across entire classes of animal. Australia’s biome diversity, isolation and convergence; aridification history provide excellent opportunities for comparative analyses cutaneous resistance; on broad-scale macroevolutionary patterns. We collected morphological and evolutionary ecology; environmental data on eighty-four (98%) Australian hylid frog species and morphological evolution; categorized them into ecotypes. Using a phylogenetic framework, we tested morphology; the hypothesis that frogs from the same ecotype display similar body shape phylogenetic comparative methods. patterns: (i) across all the Australian hylids, and (ii) through comparison with a similar previous study on 127 (97%) Australian myobatrachid spe- cies. Body size and shape variation did not follow a strong phylogenetic pat- tern and was not tightly correlated with environment, but there was a stronger association between morphotype and ecotype. Both arboreal and aquatic frogs had long limbs, whereas limbs of fossorial species were shorter. Other terrestrial species were convergent on the more typical frog body shape. We quantified the strength of morphological convergence at two levels: (i) between fossorial myobatrachid and hylid frogs, and (ii) in each ecomorph within the hylids. We found strong convergence within ecotypes, especially in fossorial species.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarrant J.Pdf
    It seems to me that if you wait until the frogs and toads have croaked their last to take some action, you’ve missed the point. Kermit the Frog dedication This thesis is dedicated to my son, Adam, and his generation, that they may know the splendour of our natural heritage as we have. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A project of this scope requires the input of numerous people, institutions and organisations. I am indebted to the following: My supervisors, Prof. Louis du Preez and Dr. Ché Weldon, who first inspired me six years ago with their enthusiasm for all things “frog”, and kindly invited me to continue my studies with the African Amphibian Conservation Research Group. Both have trusted me to be able to get on with this work whilst being based six hours away from campus. Thanks also to the secretaries of the “padda groep”, Carina de Beer and Leana Mostert who facilitated accommodation bookings for my trips to Potchefstroom as well as countless other admin- related necessities. To all my fellows in “die Padda Groep”; I have thoroughly enjoyed my trips to Potch, your trips to KZN and our adventures everywhere in-between in the paddawa; thanks for all you help and encouragement along the way. I am hugely indebted to Dr. Adrian Armstrong of Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife. Many aspects of this research would not have been possible without his help. He has been extremely generous with his time, not only for fieldwork throughout KwaZulu-Natal, but for many hours spent behind the computer screen working on predictive modelling for KwaZulu-Natal‟s threatened frog species.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Journal Issue 47
    AustralasianAustralasian JournalJournal ofof HerpetologyHerpetology ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) ISSUE 47, PUBLISHED 9 JULY 2020 2 Australasian Journal of Herpetology Australasian Journal of Herpetology Issue 47, 9 July 2020. Contents Before they get wiped out! Formal descriptions of 15 new species of Monitor Lizard in the Euprepiosaurus (AKA Varanus) indicus (Daudin, 1802) and the Shireenhosersaurea (AKA Varanus) prasinus (Schlegel, 1839) species groups. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 3-31. Two new hitherto overlooked species of Dwarf Goanna, Worrellisaurus Wells and Wellington, 1984, subgenus Paravaranus Hoser, 2013 from Australia. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 32-38. A new species of the Australian Bandy Bandy Vermicella Gray, 1841 (Serpentes:Elapidae) from north-west Australia. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 39-41. Nine new species of Katrinahoserserpenea Hoser, 2012 from northern India, western China Vietnam, Burma, Thailand and Malaysia as well as a new genus of snake associated with Xylophis Beddome, 1878 from India (Serpentes: Pareidae). ... Raymond T. Hoser, 42-56. Four new species of frog in the genus Assa from eastern Australia. ... Raymond T. Hoser, 57-63. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) Australasian Journal of Herpetology ® Publishes original research in printed form in relation to reptiles, other fauna and related matters, including classification, ecology, public interest, legal, captivity, “academic misconduct”, etc. It is a peer reviewed printed journal published in hard copy for permanent public scientific record in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al. 1999), with sizeable print run and global audience and high impact. Full details at: http://www.herp.net Copyright. All rights reserved. Australasian Journal of Herpetology is also a registered trademark ® in all relevant areas and jurisdictions (Australian trademark number: 1686575).
    [Show full text]
  • Wch9 Book of Abstracts Oral
    Architecture, Design and Conservation Danish Portal for Artistic and Scientific Research Aarhus School of Architecture // Design School Kolding // Royal Danish Academy The species status of the viviparous sea snakes Rasmussen, Arne Redsted Publication date: 2020 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Rasmussen, A. R. (2020). The species status of the viviparous sea snakes. 441. Abstract from World Congress of Herpetology 9, Dunedin, New Zealand. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 Amphibian Conservation Research Symposium (ACRS), Castle 1, January 10, 2020, 9:30 AM - 3:00 PM Victory against all odds: the successful conservation story of the Admirable Red-Belly Toad in Brazil Abadie M1, Fonte L3, Bordignon D1, Zank C2, Krob A2, Borges-Martins M1 1Federal University Of Rio Grande Do Sul, 2Instituto Curicaca, 3Trier University The Admirable Red-Belly Toad (Melanophryniscus admirabilis) is a microendemic species and one of the most threatened amphibians in Brazil.
    [Show full text]