Boletín Fármacos: Agencias Reguladoras Y Políticas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boletín Fármacos: Agencias Reguladoras Y Políticas Boletín Fármacos: Agencias Reguladoras y Políticas Boletín electrónico para fomentar el acceso y el uso adecuado de medicamentos http://www.saludyfarmacos.org/boletin-farmacos/ Publicado por Salud y Fármacos Volumen 23, número 1, Febrero 2020 Boletín Fármacos es un boletín electrónico de la organización Salud y Fármacos que se publica cuatro veces al año: el último día de cada uno de los siguientes meses: febrero, mayo, agosto y noviembre. Editores Núria Homedes Beguer, EE.UU. Antonio Ugalde, EE.UU. Editores Asociados Corina Bontempo Duca de Freitas, Brasil Albin Chaves, Costa Rica Asesor en Regulación Hernán Collado, Costa Rica Ricardo Martínez, Argentina José Ruben de Alcantara Bonfim, Brasil Francisco Debesa García, Cuba Anahí Dresser, México Asesor en Políticas José Humberto Duque, Colombia Marco Barboza, Perú Albert Figueras, España Eduardo Espinoza, El Salvador Sergio Gonorazky, Argentina Federico Tobar, Panamá Alejandro Goyret, Uruguay Eduardo Hernández, México Luis Justo, Argentina Corresponsales Óscar Lanza, Bolivia Rafaela Sierra, Centro América René Leyva, México Steven Orozco Arcila Roberto López Linares, Perú Benito Marchand, Ecuador Gabriela Minaya, Perú Webmaster Bruno Schlemper Junior, Brasil People Walking Xavier Seuba, España Federico Tobar, Panamá Francisco Rossi, Colombia Equipo de Traductores Núria Homedes, EE UU Enrique Muñoz Soler, España Antonio Ugalde, EE.UU. Boletín Fármacos solicita comunicaciones, noticias, y artículos de investigación sobre cualquier tema relacionado con el acceso y uso de medicamentos; incluyendo temas de farmacovigilancia; políticas de medicamentos; ensayos clínicos; ética y medicamentos; dispensación y farmacia; comportamiento de la industria; prácticas recomendables y prácticas cuestionadas de uso y promoción de medicamentos. También publica noticias sobre congresos y talleres que se vayan a celebrar o se hayan celebrado sobre el uso adecuado de medicamentos. Boletín Fármacos incluye una sección en la que se presentan síntesis de artículos publicados sobre estos temas y una sección bibliográfica de libros. Los materiales que se envíen para publicarse en uno de los números deben ser recibidos con treinta días de anticipación a su publicación. El envío debe hacerse preferiblemente por correo electrónico, a ser posible en Word o en RTF, a Núria Homedes ([email protected]). Para la revisión de libros enviar un ejemplar a Antonio Ugalde, 1808 Gelncliff Dr Austin Tx 78704, EE.UU. Teléfono: (202) 9999076 2 Índice Boletín Fármacos: Agencias Reguladoras y Políticas 2020; 23 (1) Agencias Reguladoras Investigaciones Prescrire opina sobre las recomendaciones centrales del informe sumario del Grupo de Trabajo Conjunto HMA-EMA sobre Grandes Bases de Datos (Big Data) Prescrire 1 El uso de medidas de impacto indirectas validadas y no validadas en dos vías de aprobación aceleradas de la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos: un estudio transversal de productos autorizados 2011-2018 Bruce CS, Brhlikova P, Heath J, McGettigan P 2 Fracaso imprudente en la identificación de efectos adversos peligrosos en los nuevos medicamentos para la diabetes Worst Pills Best Pills Newsletter, diciembre de 2019 4 ¿Los expertos de los paneles asesores tienden a votar como rebaño? Evidencia de los comités de la FDA Newham M, Midjord R 4 Los Biosimilares en la UE. Guía informativa para profesionales sanitarios. Actualizada 2019 Elaborada conjuntamente por la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos y la Comisión Europea 5 Plan de medicamentos prioritarios de la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos a los dos años: una evaluación de estudios clínicos que respaldan los medicamentos elegibles 6 Evaluación de ensayos clínicos en Brasil: historia y actualidad Gouy CML, Porto TF, Penido C. 6 Regulación Internacional Acceso global a productos médicos de calidad garantizada: la Declaración de Oxford y el llamado a la acción 7 Involucrar a los pacientes en la regulación de medicamentos: la historia de dos agencias 10 Según un nuevo informe, para mejorar la salud pública, los reguladores de medicamentos de todo el mundo deberían colaborar y eliminar las barreras para compartir información 12 La colaboración entre diversas agencias reguladoras 13 Mejorar del acceso a la reparación a través de la cooperación internacional: consideraciones del instrumento jurídicamente vinculante sobre las empresas transnacionales y otras empresas comerciales 14 Las decisiones de la EMA y de la FDA pueden impactar negativamente en América Latina 14 IGBA pide una mayor convergencia regulatoria para los biosimilares 14 La FDA colabora con Health Canada y Australia para aprobar nuevos medicamentos oncológicos 16 Europa EMA advierte que sus esfuerzos por la transparencia de los ensayos clínicos podrían peligrar 16 Investigadores advierten que la ley europea de datos impide estudios sobre diabetes y Alzheimer 17 La EMA reconoce que se está quedando atrás ante el cambio de paradigma de la innovación 18 Evaluar el impacto ambiental de los medicamentos es financieramente 'catastrófico' para la industria farmacéutica 19 A las puertas de ESMO, un estudio cuestiona la credibilidad de la evidencia de los ensayos 20 La EMA adopta las recomendaciones del Defensor del Pueblo de la UE para evitar la preocupación por el sesgo en las aprobaciones de medicamentos 20 CE ofrece mayor claridad sobre la regulación de los ensayos clínicos 21 Comisión Europea explica lo que significa autorizar ensayos clínicos con condiciones 22 ¿Cuándo pueden los resultados de la práctica clínica traducirse en evidencia creíble? Los funcionarios de la EMA discuten 22 El marco legal y regulatorio para las farmacias comunitarias en la Región Europea de la OMS (2019) 23 Francia mantendrá esquemas de aprobación rápida de ensayos clínicos 23 El regulador del Reino Unido admite el uso no autorizado del oncológico Avastin para una afección ocular grave 24 EE UU y Canadá La decisión de Canadá de publicar más datos de ensayos clínicos presiona a la FDA 25 Los miembros de los paneles y comités asesores de la agencia reguladora canadiense y las declaraciones de conflictos de interés 27 Dificultades de la FDA para regular el medicamento a lo largo de su vida 29 Magnitud del efecto de los tratamientos aprobados por la FDA sin resultados de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados 31 La FDA está rompiendo el status quo de la ciencia reguladora 33 3 GAO: los fabricantes de medicamentos tienen opiniones diferentes sobre las acciones REMS de la FDA y FTC 34 ¿Qué efectos secundarios? Los problemas con los medicamentos podrían no informarse siempre a la FDA 36 ¿De nuevo? Doral, el medicamento contra el insomnio de Galt, recibe una segunda reprimenda de la policía de la FDA que vigila la promoción 37 La FDA advierte a la instalación china de análisis de medicamentos por rechazar la inspección 38 La FDA busca retirar 4 nuevas solicitudes de medicamentos porque las empresas no presentaron informes anuales 38 Totalmente inadecuada: Public Citizen tilda de lenta la respuesta de la FDA para garantizar opioides más seguros. La Agencia debe implementar las recomendaciones de las Academias Nacionales de 2017 39 GAO encuentra problemas continuos con las inspecciones de la FDA a las instalaciones extranjeras de medicamentos 40 Un nuevo estudio dice que algunos vendedores de suplementos para estimular el cerebro están incumpliendo una prohibición de la FDA 41 Para globalizar la protección de la salud pública ampliando las sanciones penales 42 ¿La FDA hace lo suficiente para sacar biosimilares al mercado? Los expertos discuten 44 Los líderes de la FDA temen que la agencia pierda talento en terapia génica y oncología 45 La FDA admite que se equivocó al otorgar la categoría de huérfano a un tratamiento de adicción a los opioides 46 La FDA mantiene los medicamentos de marca en el programa de revisión acelerada, a pesar de los problemas de fabricación 47 La FDA finaliza la guía sobre diseños de ensayos adaptativos 49 La FDA revisa la guía sobre estudios pos-comercialización para incluir el Sistema ARIA, la Ley SUPPORT 50 La FDA aclara cómo regulará la salud digital y la inteligencia artificial 50 Scott Gottlieb tiene otro puesto en una junta directiva para agregar al currículum, y es sobre un tema favorito 51 Políticas Investigaciones Recomendaciones de políticas para reducir los precios de medicamentos Public Citizen 52 Entrevistas Necesitamos una opción pública en la industria farmacéutica 55 Políticas Globales Integridad de la investigación: es el momento de tomar medidas globales 57 América Latina Chile. Piñera: No vamos a permitir que las farmacias sigan abusando de las personas 57 Colombia. Recobros por medicamentos le han costado al país Pco13.000 millones de pesos: Procuraduría 58 Colombia. El “regaño” del Consejo de Estado al Minsalud por expedir un polémico decreto 59 Perú. Medicinas baratas, accesibles y de calidad 60 Europa España. Los laboratorios proponen que la industria nacional produzca los fármacos que sufren desabastecimiento 61 Malta observa lo que hace Europa sobre la transparencia de los precios de los medicamentos 62 Países Bajos. La Iniciativa Internacional Escaneando el Horizonte (IHSI) comenzó en 9 pequeños países europeos 63 Los Países Bajos almacenan medicamentos para luchar contra el desabastecimiento; millones ahorrados en medicamentos caros 63 El partido laborista de RU quiere que el gobierno fabrique sus propios medicamentos para abaratar los precios 64 EE UU y Canadá El descubrimiento canadiense que se convirtió en el medicamento más caro del mundo y luego desapareció, tiene una segunda oportunidad 64 EE UU.
Recommended publications
  • Md. Jury Awards $18M to Former Business Partner in Pharma Lawsuit – Maryland Daily Record
    11/26/2018 Md. jury awards $18M to former business partner in pharma lawsuit – Maryland Daily Record Md. jury awards $18M to former business partner in pharma lawsuit By: Anamika Roy Daily Record Legal Affairs Writer November 26, 2018 A jury in a federal lawsuit awarded a Rockville scientist $18 million in a lawsuit against his former business partners. In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Claudio De Simone and ExeGi Pharma LLC alleged VSL Pharmaceuticals Inc., Leadiant Biosciences Inc. and Alfasigma USA Inc. tried to make a copy of a drug De Simone created without having access to the proprietary formula and sold a “knock-off” version of the drug. De Simone also alleged the copy product had never been clinically tested, unlike his product, which underwent extensive clinical research, the lawsuit states. After a three-week trial and about 12 hours of deliberations, a jury of seven women and two men found last week that the pharmaceutical companies owe De Simone more than $18 million in damages, including $15 million for false advertising, nearly $1.9 million for unjust enrichment and nearly $1 million for breach of contract, according to online court records. An attorney for De Simone said Monday that the jury was likely swayed in favor of his client because of “the degree of willful misconduct” on the other side. “We proved that they were marketing to the general public, that includes some very sick patients who rely on the product my client invented to manage severe symptoms of gastrointestinal diseases,” said Jeremy W.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Tbilisi
    2(534) 2020 TBILISI INID CODES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA INVENTIONS, UTILITY MODELS (54) Title of the invention (10) Number of publication for application, which has been examined (57) Abstract (11) Number of patent and kind of document (60) Number of examined patent document granted by foreign patent office, date from which patent (21) Serial number of application has effect and country code (22) Date of filing of the application (62) Number of the earlier application and in case of divided application, date of filing an (23) Date of exhibition or the date of the earlier filing and the number of application, if any application (24) Date from which patent may have effect (71) Name, surname and address of applicant (country code) (31) Number of priority application (72) Name, surname of inventor (country code) (32) Date of filing of priority application (73) Name, surname and address of patent owner (country code) (33) Code of the country or regional organization allotting priority application number (74) Name, surname of representative or patent attorney (44) Date of publication of application not granted, but examined and number of bulletin (85) Date of commencement of the national phase of International Application (45) Date of publication of registered document (86) Number and date of filing of international application (51) International Patent Classification Index (87) Number and date of publication of international application (94) Calculated date of expiry of the SPC or the duration of the SPC DESIGNS (10) Number
    [Show full text]
  • Eesti Patendileht
    ISSN 2228-3609 EESTI VABARIIK EESTI PATENDILEHT 12/2020 DETSEMBER TALLINN PATENDIAMETI AMETLIK VÄLJAANNE XXVI aastakäik Käesolevas numbris esitatud andmed loetakse avaldatuks 15. detsembril 2020. a Eesti Patendilehte antakse välja patendiseaduse paragrahvi 34 lõike 3 alusel. The Estonian Patent Gazette is the official publication of the Estonian Patent Office published under § 34(3) of the Patents Act of the Republic of Estonia. The data presented in this issue is deemed to be published on 15 December 2020. Patendiameti kvaliteedijuhtimissüsteem vastab ISO 9001:2015 standardile. The Estonian Patent Office implements a Quality Management System according to ISO 9001:2015 standard. Patendiameti The Registry Department registriosakond of the Estonian Patent Office Toompuiestee 7 Toompuiestee 7 15041 Tallinn 15041 Tallinn, ESTONIA Tel 627 7908 Phone +372 627 7908 E-post [email protected] E-mail [email protected] © Patendiamet, 2020 EE PATENDILEHT 12/2020, 15.12.2020 3 SISUKORD CONTENTS Bibliograafiliste andmete identifitseerimise Internationally Agreed Numbers rahvusvahelised numberkoodid (INID-koodid) . 6 for the Identification of Data (INID Codes) . 6 Riikide, teiste ühenduste ja valitsustevaheliste List of Codes of States, Other Entities and organisatsioonide koodid ....................... 7 Intergovernmental Organizations . 7 I. EESTI PATENDID ................... 8 I. ESTONIAN PATENTS ................ 8 BA1A. Avaldatud patenditaotlused ............... - BA1A. Published Patent Applications . - BB2A. Avaldatud rahvusvaheliste taotluste BB2A. Translations
    [Show full text]
  • BOPI 12/2019, Din 30.12.2019
    ROMÂNIA OFICIUL DE STAT PENTRU INVENŢII ŞI MĂRCI BULETINUL OFICIAL DE PROPRIETATE INDUSTRIALĂ Secţiunea CERERI ŞI BREVETE DE INVENŢIE EUROPENE CU EFECTE ÎN ROMÂNIA Nr. 12/2019 Cu ocazia sărbătorilor de iarnă, Editura OSIM® urează cititorilor şi colaboratorilor săi un AN NOU FERICIT, multă sănătate, bucurii şi realizarea tuturor aspiraţiilor pe plan personal şi profesional. La mulţi ani! IUL DE S IC TA F T O P E N T R U I N V I E C N 2020 R T A I I M S I OFICIUL DE STAT PENTRU INVENÞII ªI MÃRCI BUCUREªTI - ROMÂNIA BULETIN OFICIAL DE PROPRIETATE INDUSTRIALÃ SECÞIUNEA CERERI ªI BREVETE DE INVENÞIE EUROPENE CU EFECTE ÎN ROMÂNIA _______________ BOPI 12/2019, din 30.12.2019 REDACÞIA Str. Ion Ghica, nr. 3-5, Bucureºti, România Telefon: 021.306. 08. 00 pânã la 021.306.08.29 Fax: 021 312.38.19 e-mail: office @ osim.ro BULETIN OFICIAL DE PROPRIETATE INDUSTRIALÃ Nr. 12 CUPRINS GENERAL 30 decembrie 2019 Prezentare BOPI ......................................................... 4 Direcþia-Redacþia-Administraþia Coduri normalizate OMPI, utilizate în BOPI . 5 OFICIUL DE STAT PENTRU INVENÞII ªI MÃRCI Str. Ion Ghica, nr. 5, sector 3 telefon: 021 306 08 00 II. BREVETE DE INVENÞIE EUROPENE CU EFECTE ÎN ROMÂNIA . 7 pânã la 021.306.08.29 fax: 021 .312.38.19 e-mail: office @ osim.ro 1. Brevete de invenþie europene pentru care a fost depusã traducerea în http://www.osim.ro limba românã a fasciculului brevetului european, conform art. 6 alin. 2 din BUCUREªTI-ROMÂNIA Legea nr. 611/2002 ................................................. 9 2. Brevete de invenþie europene pentru care a fost depusã traducerea în limba românã a fasciculului brevetului european, conform art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pharma 1000 Top Global Pharmaceutical Company Report
    The Pharma 1000 Top Global Pharmaceutical Company Report September 2020 © 2020. All rights reserved. Securities offered in the United States are offered through Torreya Capital LLC, Member FINRA/SIPC. In Europe such services are offered through Torreya Partners (Europe) LLP, which is authorized and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority. 1 Table of Contents The Evolving Global Pharmaceutical Sector 5 The Biotechnology Sector 16 The Branded Pharma Sector 24 The Generic Drug Sector 34 Financial Players in Pharma: Private Equity and Royalty Firms 38 Top Players by Country and Segment 44 The Pharma 1000 List 55 About Torreya and Acknowledgements 96 2 Torreya’s Pharma 1000 Report . Torreya is a globally active investment bank focused on the pharmaceutical sector. We began to track assets, people and companies in the industry with our own database in 2012. In “The Pharma 1000” report, we leverage our database to identify the top 1000 companies by value today. This presentation provides a summary of the key findings of the report. We hope to give you a greater sense of the global scale of the pharmaceutical industry and its extraordinary growth. We also wish to recognize the companies that appear on the Pharma 1000 list for the accomplishment of becoming a top company in one of the world’s most important and challenging Download the Full Report industries. 3 Torreya Pharma 1000 Study Approach . We identified approximately 30,000 pharmaceutical companies in 2012. Our team studied these companies and pulled out the active operating companies in ethical pharmaceuticals which had a tangible basis for valuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Regulatory and Financial Barriers to Bring Repurposed Medicines to Cancer Patients
    POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS published: 31 January 2020 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01664 On-Label or Off-Label? Overcoming Regulatory and Financial Barriers to Bring Repurposed Medicines to Cancer Patients Ciska Verbaanderd 1,2*, Ilse Rooman 2,3, Lydie Meheus 2 and Isabelle Huys 1 1 Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 2 Anticancer Fund, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium, 3 Oncology Research Centre, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium Repurposing of medicines has gained a lot of interest from the research community in recent years as it could offer safe, timely, and affordable new treatment options for cancer Edited by: patients with high unmet needs. Increasingly, questions arise on how new uses will be Ileana Mardare, translated into clinical practice, especially in case of marketed medicinal products that are Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, out of basic patent or regulatory protection. The aim of this study was to portray the Romania regulatory framework relevant for making repurposed medicines available to cancer Reviewed by: patients in Europe and propose specific policy recommendations to address the Guenka Ivanova Petrova, current regulatory and financial barriers. We outlined two routes relevant to the clinical Medical University, Bulgaria adoption of a repurposed medicine. First, a new indication can be approved, and thus Prince Kasongo Mwila, brought on-label, via the marketing authorization procedures established in European and Potchefstroom Hospital, South Africa national legislation. Such procedures initiate a detailed and independent assessment of fi fi *Correspondence: the quality and the bene t-risk balance of a medicinal product in a speci c indication, Ciska Verbaanderd benefiting both prescribers and patients as it reassures them that the scientific evidence is [email protected] robust.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union Review of Pharmaceutical Incentives: Suggestions for Change
    European Union Review of Pharmaceutical Incentives: Suggestions for Change Medicines Law & Policy June 2019 Acknowledgements: This series of briefing papers have been prepared by Pascale Boulet, Christopher Garrison and Ellen ‘t Hoen of Medicines Law & Policy, with editing by Jacquelyn Veraldi and Kaitlin Mara of Medicines Law & Policy. The authors would like to thank the following reviewers, whose helpful comments have improved the papers: David Banta, Sven Bostyn (Centre for Advanced studies in Biomedical Innovation Law (CeBIL)), Pierre Chirac (La Revue Prescrire), Thyra de Jong (Technopolis Group), Sergio Napolitano (Medicines for Europe), Yannis Natsis (European Public Health Alliance), Judit Rius (UNDP), Ancel.la Santos (Health Action International). The opinions expressed are, however, those of Medicines Law & Policy. Medicines Law & Policy wishes to thank the Open Society Foundations for providing the financial support that made these papers possible. More information at: www.opensocietyfoundations.org. This series of briefing documents is licensed under Creative Commons, Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International. The documents may be shared freely so long as Medicines Law & Policy is credited, redistribution is not being done for commercial purposes, and the text is not modified. Two images on the cover are used under Creative Commons: Blood samples by the Pan American Health Organization (2007); flags of the European Union by the European Parliament (2017). Table of Contents European Union Review of Pharmaceutical
    [Show full text]
  • List of Institutions Funding Cancer Research
    List of institutions funding cancer research If your institution is missing or the information is incomplete, please contact [email protected] Governmental organizations National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion - ANPCyT, Argentina National Cancer Institute of Argentina, Argentina National Scientific and Technical Research Council - CONICET, Argentina ACT Health Research Office, Australia Australian Agency For International Development, Australia Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation - ANSTO, Australia Australian Research Council, Australia Cancer Australia, Australia Cancer Institute New South Wales, Australia Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation - CSIRO, Australia Department of Health of Australia, Australia Department of Industry, Innovation and Science of Australia, Australia Department of Veterans' Affairs of Australia, Australia Foreign Investment Review Board, Australia Government of Australia, Australia Government of Queensland, Australia Insurance Commission of Western Australia, Australia National Health and Medical Research Council - NHMRC, Australia National Library of Australia, Australia Regional Government of South Australia, Australia State of Victoria Government, Australia Therapeutic Innovation Australia, Ltd., Australia Victorian Cancer Agency, Australia Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria Austrian National Bank, Austria Austrian Research Promotion Agency - FFG, Austria Austrian Science Fund, Austria Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology of Austria,
    [Show full text]
  • Developments and Trends in Competition Law and Practice
    DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS IN COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE PROF. FREDERICK ABBOTT FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW – UNDP CONSULTANT USING COMPETITION LAW TO PROMOTE ACCESS TO MEDICINES AND OTHER HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES 5TH GLOBAL CONGRESS ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST SEPTEMBER 28 2018 © 2018 Frederick M. Abbott THE ROLE OF COMPETITION LAW • Global pharmaceutical market characterized by multiple failures • Political • Economic • Regulatory • Scientific Necessitates competition law approach broader than uni- dimensional attention to elimination of producer restraints © 2018 Frederick M. Abbott PUBLIC HEALTH AND (NON-) SELF-CORRECTING MARKETS • Early US Supreme Court jurisprudence under Sherman Act focused on consumer protection • Transition to Chicago School approach in 1980s emphasized self-correcting nature of markets and removal of producer restraints • Producer-restraint focus continues to permeate discourse among competition authorities, courts and academia • Markets characterized by legislative grants of exclusive rights and other regulatory barriers (e.g., extended approval processes) are not "self-correcting" © 2018 Frederick M. Abbott COMPETITION AUTHORITIES AND SECTOR INQUIRIES • Various approaches to health and pharmaceutical sector inquiries – activity in this area has expanded dramatically since UNDP initiated its work program 5+ years ago • EU Competition Directorate undertook deep analysis of role of patents and other market exclusivity mechanisms – report in 2009 http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/pharmaceuticals/inquiry/ • Instituted continuous monitoring of validity challenge settlements • Dutch government investigating price impact of patent extensions and regulatory exclusivity rules • EU Competition Directorate pursuing excessive pricing probe of South Africa's Aspen Pharmaceutical (2017) – refers to exceptional circumstances • UK Competition and Markets Authority leading excessive pricing efforts – discussed separately © 2018 Frederick M.
    [Show full text]