(Petagna, 1792) (Thalassinidea, Upogebiidae) from Laboratory-Reared Material

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Petagna, 1792) (Thalassinidea, Upogebiidae) from Laboratory-Reared Material Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 43: 1 (2003) 83-90 Balaban, PhiladelphiaRehovot 0168-8170/03/$05.008 2003 Balaban Redescription of the larval stages of Upobebiapusilla (Petagna, 1792) (Thalassinidea, Upogebiidae) from laboratory-reared material ANTONMA DOS SANTOS'. and JOSE PAULA* 'Instituto de InvestigapTo das Pescas e do Mar (IPIUAR), Av. de Brasilia, s/n. 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal Tel. +351 (21) 302-7194; Fax +351 (21) 302-5948; email: [email protected] 'IMR-Laboratdrio Maritimo da Guia, Faculdade de Cigncias, Universidade de Lisboa, fitrada do Guincho, 2750-642 Cascais, Portugal Received 21 November 2001; Accepted 9 December 2002 Summary The complete larval development of Upogebia pusilla (Petagna, 1792) was reared under laboratory conditions and the development comprised four zoeal stages and a megalop. The morphological features were described, illustrated and compared with other known larvae of Upogebia. Key words: Larval development, Upogebiapusilla, Upogebiidae, Decapoda, zoeal stages, megalopal stage. Introduction 1919 from plankton and reared material [four zoeal Upogebia pusilla (Petagna, 1792) is a common stages and post-larva]; U. pusilla (originally as U. species on estuaries in Portugal and occurs from the littoralis) by Dolgopolskaia, 1954 and 1969 [four zoeal English Channel to Mauritania and the Canary Islands, stages and post-larva] and U.deltaura and U. pusilla the Mediterranean, Black Sea and Suez Canal (as U. littoralis) by Heegaard, 1963 [first stage zoea]. (d'Udekem d'Acoz, 1999). Besides U.pusilla, the Although these studies gave some indication of general Upogebiidae family has five other species occurring in form, appendage morphology and chromatophore European waters: Gebiacantha talismani (Bouvier), patterns, the descriptions do not meet with modem day Upogebia deltaura (Leach), U. mediterranea Noel, standards. U stellata (Montagu) and U. tipica (Nardo). With regard to U.pirsilla, Dolgopolskaia (1 954) has Upogebiidae larvae are known for a number of described four zoeas and one megalop (as post-larval European species only; Gebia littoralis (either stage) from plankton material caught in the Black Sea Upogebiapusilla or U. tipica according to Williamson, as U. littoralis. This description was re-published in 1967) by Cano, 1861 [three zoeal stages and post- 1969 as U. pusilla syn. U.littoralis (Dolgopolskaia, larva]; Upogebia deltaura and U.stellata by Webb, 1969). Both references present the descriptions of the 'Corresponding author. Proceedings of the Third Crustacean Larval Conference, Melbourne, Australia, July 9-1 3, 2001. 84 A. Dos Santos and J. Paula / IRD 43 (2003) 83-90 appendages but are lacking the accurate number and U. pusilla reaches the megalopal stage after 12-15 position of setal processes. Thus, the morphological days of rearing. features of all zoeal stages and megalop remain incomplete. Description - Upogebia pusilla (Petagna, 1792) The purpose of this study is to complete the (Figs. 1-6) description of the larval stages of U. pusilla based on larvae reared from eggs to megalop in order to facili- Upogebia littoralis (Dolgopolskaia, 1954: 198-209, tate the identification of the different stages and to Figs. 10-14, four zoeal stages and post-larva). distinguish them from other species of the genus Upogebia pusilla (Dolgopolskaia, 1969: Plates Upogebia from plankton samples. XXVIII-XXX, four zoeal stages and post-larva). Zoea I Materials and Methods Dimension: TL = 2.10-2.38 mm; CL = 0.77- 0.87 mm. Several ovigerous females of U. pusilla were col- Carapace (Fig. 1A): longer than broad with a lected with a Yabby pump from their burrows in May, pointed rostra1 spine reaching the tip of antennules; 1989, in the intertidal muddy sand of the mid-Mira eyes fused with the anterior portion of carapace. Estuary, southwestern Portugal. Females were kept Antennule (Fig. 1B): uniramous unsegmented individually in 500 ml bowls, bottoms covered with process with one long plumose seta subterminally and plastic tubes, to simulate the burrow structure and one long thick and four thin aesthetascs, and one seta decrease stress conditions. The water was at a salinity terminally. Endopod absent. of 35 and at room temperature, and females were kept Antenna (Fig. 1C): protopod with one short serrated unfed until hatching. The first stage zoea hatched on 1 , spine near the base of exopod; endopod with three 5 and 9 June. apical plumose setae; tip of exopod pointed, bearing Cultures used 1 1 tanks, with an initial average of nine plumose setae on its inner margin. five larvae per ml, with the same salinity and temp- Mandible (Fig. 1D): incisor process smaller than erature as for females, and were gently aerated. Clean molar process; palp absent. water and newly-hatched Artemia spp. nauplii as food Maxillule (Fig. 1 E): coxal endite with eight setae; were added every second day. The light-dark period basial endite with four stout spines and two setae; was natural. Periodic observation of larvae was made, endopod unsegmented with 2+2+4 setae. and a number of specimens of each larval stage were Maxilla (Fig. 1F): coxal endite bilobed with 8+5 preserved in buffered 4% formaldehyde. setae; basial endite bilobed with 5+4 setae; endopod Drawings and measurements were made with the unsegmented and bilobed with 3+3 distal setae; aid of a camera lucida on a binocular Wild M8. Setal scaphognathite with 10 marginal plumose setae. observations and drawings were made using a Zeiss First maxilliped (Fig. 1 G): coxa with one seta; basis microscope with camera lucida. The preparation of with 9 (2+3+2+2) setae; endopod 5-segmented with 3, slides with appendages was temporary. The long 2+1, 1, 2+1, four setae; exopod 2-segmented, bearing aesthetascs on the antennules and the long plumose four long setae terminally. setae on distal exopod segments are drawn truncated, Second maxilliped (Fig. 1H): coxa without setae; and setal counts refer proximal to distal sequence. basis with 1+1 setae; endopod 4-segmented with 2, 2, Measurements taken were: total length (TL) from tip of 2+1, four setae respectively; exopod 2-segmented7 rostrum and posterior end of telson, and carapace bearing four long setae terminally. length (CL) from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of Third maxilliped (Fig. 1 I): biramous bud. carapace. The spent females and complete larval series Pereiopods (Fig. 1 I): rudimentary buds. have been deposited in the Instituto de InvestigaqFio das Abdomen (Fig. 1A): Six somites without lateral Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR) in Lisbon, Portugal spine on somites, being the sixth fused with telson; (number Ads 08/1993). anal spine present. Pleopods: absent. Resu Its Uropod: absent. Telson (Fig. 1A): with median cleft and 7+7 Rearing data processes posteriorly; outermost immovable spine, Under laboratory conditions, U.pusilla hatches as second reduced to a very thin seta situated near the zoea; it passes through four zoeal stages to megalopa. base of process 3; processes 3-7 with plumose setae. A. Dos Santos and J. Palula / IRD 43 (2003) 83-90 85 i P- ,,jw Fig. 1. Upogebia pusilla. Zoea 1. A: dorsal view; B: anten- nule; C: antenna; D: mandible; E: maxilule; F: maxilla; G: first maxilliped; H: second maxilliped; I: (from left to Fig. 2. Upogebia pusilla. Zoea 11. A: lateral view; 9: anten- right) third maxilliped and pereiopods. Scale bar: 1 mm (A); nule; C: antenna; D: maxilule; E: first maxilliped; F: second 100 pm (B-1). maxilliped; G:third maxilliped; H: first pereiopod; 1: second pereiopod; J: third to fifth pereiopods; K: telson. Scale bar: 1 mm (A); 500 pm (K) and 100 pm (B-J). Zoea II Dimension: TL = 2.40-2.62 mm; CL = 0.88- Second maxilliped (Fig. 2F): coxa without setae; 0.92 mm. basis with 1+2 setae; endopod 4-segmented with Carapace (Fig. 2A): eyes stalked; otherwise 2,2+1, 3+1, five setae; exopod 2-segmented, bearing unchanged. six long setae terminally. Antennule (Fig. 2B): biramous. Protopod with two Third maxilliped (Fig. 2G): coxa and basis without inner long plumose setae and two outer short setae; two setae; endopod as bud without setae and unsegmented; simple small setae on distal end; endopod bearing one exopod 2-segmented with 6 natatory setae terminally. terminal long plumose seta; exopod with four thick and First pereiopod (Fig. 2H): biramous; endopod as three thin aesthetascs, one thin seta terminally and two bud; exopod 2-segmented, distal one with six plumose small simple setae sub-terminally. setae. Antenna (Fig. 2C): protopod with two serrated Second pereiopod (Fig. 21): birarnous; endopod as spines; endopod with three apical plumose setae; bud; exopod segmented, distal one with five plumose exopod with 10 inner plumose setae. setae. Mandible: unchanged. Third to fifth pereiopods (Fig. 25): pereiopod 3 Maxillule (Fig. 2D): coxal endite with six setae; biramous; pereiopod 4 and 5 uniramous with endopod basial endite with four stout spines and three plumose buds absent and without setae. setae; endopod with 2+2+4 setae. Abdomen (Fig. 2A): unchanged. Maxilla: unchanged. Pleopods (Fig. 2A): rudimentary buds in abdominal First maxilliped (Fig. 2E): unchanged. somites 2-5. 86 A. Dos Santos and J. Paula / IRLI 43 (2003) 83-90 Uropod: absent. Telson (Fig. 2K): with small median process and 8+8 lateral processes posteriorly. Zoea III Dimension: TL = 2.64-2.88 mm; CL = 0.88- 0.98 mm. Carapace (Fig. 3A): larger, otherwise unchanged. Antennule (Fig. 3B): protopod with eight long plumose setae and four outer short and thin setae subterminally and another four on distal end; endopod with two fine subterminal setae; exopod with three large aesthetascs, two long and three very thin setae. Antenna (Fig. 3C): endopod with two thin and simple setae; otherwise unchanged. Mandible: unchanged. Maxillule: unchanged. Maxilla (Fig. 3D): coxal endite with 7-8+5 setae; basial endite with 5+7 setae; scaphognathite with 12 plumose setae; otherwise unchanged.
Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ghost and Mud Shrimp
    Zootaxa 4365 (3): 251–301 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A Parasites (Isopoda: Epicaridea and Nematoda) from ghost and mud shrimp (Decapoda: Axiidea and Gebiidea) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species of bopyrid isopod and clarification of Pseudione Kossmann, 1881 CHRISTOPHER B. BOYKO1,4, JASON D. WILLIAMS2 & JEFFREY D. SHIELDS3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @ 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Aquatic Health Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 252 Introduction . 252 Methods and materials . 253 Taxonomy . 253 Isopoda Latreille, 1817 . 253 Bopyroidea Rafinesque, 1815 . 253 Ionidae H. Milne Edwards, 1840. 253 Ione Latreille, 1818 . 253 Ione cornuta Bate, 1864 . 254 Ione thompsoni Richardson, 1904. 255 Ione thoracica (Montagu, 1808) . 256 Bopyridae Rafinesque, 1815 . 260 Pseudioninae Codreanu, 1967 . 260 Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981. 260 Acrobelione halimedae n. sp. 260 Key to females of species of Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981 . 262 Gyge Cornalia & Panceri, 1861. 262 Gyge branchialis Cornalia & Panceri, 1861 . 262 Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939) . 264 Ionella Bonnier, 1900 .
    [Show full text]
  • Upogebia Pugettensis Class: Malacostraca Order: Decapoda Section: Anomura, Paguroidea the Blue Mud Shrimp Family: Upogebiidae
    Phylum: Arthropoda, Crustacea Upogebia pugettensis Class: Malacostraca Order: Decapoda Section: Anomura, Paguroidea The blue mud shrimp Family: Upogebiidae Taxonomy: Dana described Gebia (on either side of the mouth), two pairs of pugettensis in 1852 and this species was later maxillae and three pairs of maxillipeds. The redescribed as Upogebia pugettensis maxillae and maxillipeds attach posterior to (Stevens 1928; Williams 1986). the mouth and extend to cover the mandibles (Ruppert et al. 2004). Description Carapace: Bears two rows of 11–12 Size: The type specimen was 50.8 mm in teeth laterally (Fig. 1) in addition to a small length and the illustrated specimen (ovigerous distal spines (13 distal spines, 20 lateral teeth female from Coos Bay, Fig. 1) was 90 mm in on carapace shoulder, see Wicksten 2011). length. Individuals are often larger and reach Carapace with thalassinidean line extending sizes to 100 mm (range 75–112 mm) and from anterior to posterior margin (Wicksten northern specimens are larger than those in 2011). southern California (MacGinitie and Rostrum: Large, tridentate, obtuse, MacGinitie 1949; Wicksten 2011). rough and hairy (Schmitt 1921), the sides Color: Light blue green to deep olive brown bear 3–5 short conical teeth (Wicksten 2011). with brown fringes on pleopods and pleon. Rostral tip shorter than antennular peduncle. Individual color variable and may depend on Two short processes extending on either side feeding habits (see Fig. 321, Kozloff 1993; each with 0–2 dorsal teeth (Wicksten 2011). Wicksten 2011). Teeth: General Morphology: The body of decapod Pereopods: Two to five simple crustaceans can be divided into the walking legs.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Paleogene Species of Mud Shrimp (Crustacea, Decapoda, Upogebiidae) from Europe and North America
    Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, no. 33 (2006), p. 77–85, 2 pls., 1 fig. © 2006, Mizunami Fossil Museum Two new Paleogene species of mud shrimp (Crustacea, Decapoda, Upogebiidae) from Europe and North America Rene H. B. Fraaije1, Barry W. M. van Bakel1, John W. M. Jagt2, and Yvonne Coole3 1Oertijdmuseum De Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL-5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands <[email protected]> 2Natuurhistorisch Museum Maastricht, de Bosquetplein 6-7, NL-6211 KJ Maastricht, the Netherlands <[email protected]> 3St. Maartenslaan 88, NL-6039 BM Stramproy, the Netherlands Abstract Two new species of the mud shrimp genus Upogebia (Callianassoidea, Upogebiidae) are described; U. lambrechtsi sp. nov. from the lower Eocene (Ypresian) of Egem (northwest Belgium), and U. barti sp. nov. from the upper Oligocene (Chattian) of Washington State (USA). Both new species here described have been collected from small, ball-shaped nodules; they are relatively well preserved and add important new data on the palaeobiogeographic distribution of fossil upogebiids. Key words: Crustacea, Decapoda, Upogebiidae, Eocene, Oligocene, Belgium, USA, new species Introduction Jurassic species of Upogebia have been recorded, in stratigraphic order: On modern tidal flats, burrowing upogebiid shrimps constitute the dominant decapod crustacean group. For instance, in the 1 – Upogebia rhacheochir Stenzel, 1945 (p. 432, text-fig. 12; pl. intertidal zone of the northern Adriatic (Mediterranean, southern 42); Britton Formation (Eagle Ford Group), northwest of Dallas Europe) up to 200 individuals per square metre have been recorded (Texas, USA). Stenzel (1945, p. 408) dated the Britton (Dworschak, 1987). Worldwide, several dozens of species of Formation as early Turonian, but a late Cenomanian age is Upogebia and related genera are known, and their number is still more likely (compare Jacobs et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Axiidea (Micheleidae) and Gebiidea (Laomediidae and Upogebiidae) of Panglao, the Philippines
    Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 121 19–32 Wien, Februar 2019 Axiidea (Micheleidae) and Gebiidea (Laomediidae and Upogebiidae) of Panglao, the Philippines P. C. Dworschak* Abstract A summary of species from one axiidean family and two gebiidean families collected during the Panglao Marine Biodiversity Project 2004 is presented. The axiidean family Micheleidae is represented by one damaged specimen, tentatively identified asMichelea sp. The gebiidean family Laomediidae is represented by two species, Naushonia carinata DWORSCHAK, MARIN & ANKER, 2006 and Axianassa heardi ANKER, 2011. The family Upogebiidae is the most diverse and represented by nine species, Acutigebia sp., Neogebicula monochela (SAKAI, 1967) with one specimen each, Gebiacantha ceratophora (DE MAN, 1905) and G. multispinosa NGOC-HO, 1994 with two and three specimens, respectively, G. laurentae NGOC-HO, 1989 with 21 specimens was the most common followed by Upogebia barbata (STRAHL, 1862) and U. holthuisi SAKAI, 1982 with 8 and 6 specimens, respectively. Figures for seven species of Upogebiidae are presented. Except for U. barbata, all upogebiid species and Axianassa heardi are here recorded the first time from the Philippines. Key words: Axiidea, Micheleidae, Gebiidea, Laomediidae, Upogebiidae, Panglao, Philippines, burrowing shrimp Introduction The international Panglao Marine Biodiversity Project in May-July 2004 consisted of an extensive sampling of molluscs and decapod crustaceans around the island of Panglao, southwest of Bohol, Philippines (BOUCHET et al. 2009). The special task of the author during this survey was to collect axiidean and gebiidean shrimp and their associated decapod and mollusc fauna with the aid of a yabby pump. This sampling of axiideans and gebiideans revealed numerous new records and several undescribed species that have been studied in earlier papers (DWORSCHAK 2006, 2007, 2011a, b, 2014, 2018, DWORSCHAK et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Mediterranean and Caribbean Thalassinidea (Decapoda)
    Biology of Mediterranean and Caribbean Thalassinidea (Decapoda) Peter C. DWORSCHAK Dritte Zoologische Abteilung, Naturhistorisches Museum, Burgring 7, A 1014 Wien, Austria ([email protected]) Abstract Among burrowing organisms, the most complex and extensive burrow systems are found within the Thalassinidea. This group of decapods comprises some 520+ species in currently 11 families and 80+ genera. They live predominantly in very shallow waters, where they often occur in high densities and influence the whole sedimentology and geochemistry of the seabed. In this contribution I present results of studies on the biology of several Mediterranean (Upogebia pusilla, U. tipica, Pestarella tyrrhena, P. candida, Jaxea nocturna) and Caribbean (Axiopsis serratifrons, Neocallichirus grandimana, Glypturus acanthochirus, Corallianassa longiventris) species. Of special interest is the occurrence of debris-filled chambers in the burrows of two callianassid species, Pestarella tyrrhena and Corallianassa longiventris. The possible role of this introduced plant material for the nutrition of the shrimps is discussed. 1. Introduction The Thalassinidea are a group of mainly burrowing decapod shrimps. They have attracted increased attention in recent ecological studies on marine soft-bottom benthos, especially in terms of their influence on the whole sedimentology and geochemistry of the seabed (Ziebis et al., 1996a, b), their bioturbating activities (Rowden & Jones, 1993; Rowden et al., 1998a, b) and consequent effects on benthic community structure (Posey, 1986; Posey et al., 1991; Wynberg & Branch, 1994; Tamaki, 1994). They are of particular interest because they construct very complex and extensive burrow systems (Griffis & Suchanek, 1991; Nickell & Atkinson, 1995). This group of decapods comprises some 520+ species in currently 11 families and 80+ genera.
    [Show full text]
  • (Decapoda, Gebiidea, Upogebiidae) in the South China Sea
    THE SUBFAMILY NEOGEBICULINAE (DECAPODA, GEBIIDEA, UPOGEBIIDAE) IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA BY WENLIANG LIU1,3) and RUIYU LIU (J.Y. LIU)2,4) 1) Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China; Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 2) Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China ABSTRACT Three species of the subfamily Neogebiculinae Sakai, 2006 are recorded from the Beibu Gulf (Tonkin Gulf), northern South China Sea. The first species, Neogebicula wistari Ngoc-Ho, 1995 is recorded for the first time from Chinese waters. The other two are described as new to science in this paper. The present authors take great pleasure to name them as Paragebicula bijdeleyi sp.nov.andNeogebicula holthuisi sp. nov. to honor the great carcinologist, the late Dr. Lipke Bijdeley Holthuis. Neogebicula holthuisi is closely allied to N. monochela (Sakai, 1967) but differs markedly in having an elongate rostrum. Paragebicula bijdeleyi sp. nov. is closely related to P. edentata (Lin, Ngoc-Ho & Chan, 2001) but differs markedly in the rostrum bearing marginal denticles. RÉSUMÉ Trois espèces de la sous-famille des Neogebiculinae Sakai, 2006 sont signalées dans le Golfe de Beibu (Golfe de Tonkin), nord de la mer de Chine du Sud. Le première espèce, Neogebicula wistari Ngoc-Ho, 1995 est signalée pour la première fois dans les eaux chinoises. Les deux autres sont décrites dans cet article comme nouvelles pour la science. C’est avec un grand plaisir que les auteurs les dédient à la mémoire du grand carcinologiste Dr. Lipke Bijdeley Holthuis, en les nommant Paragebicula bijdeleyi sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Distribution of Intertidal Upogebiid Shrimp
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository Distribution of intertidal upogebiid shrimp (Crustacea : Title Decapoda : Thalassinidea) in Japan Author(s) ITANI, Gyo Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto Citation University (2004), 29(4): 383-399 Issue Date 2004-07-21 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/156413 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University Contr. biot. Lab. Kyoto Univ., Vol. 29, pp. 383-399. Issued 21 July 2004 Distribution of intertidal upogebiid shrimp (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea) in Japan Gyo ITANI Division ofAquatic Biology and Ecology, Center for Marine Environmenta1 Studies, Ehime University, 3 Bunkyo-cho, Matsuyama 790-8577, Japan ([email protected]) ABSTRAor The distributions of six intertidal species of Upogebiidae were determined by collecting shrimp from 74 sites on tidal flats and boulder beaches in Japan, from northem Honshu (the main island of Japan) to the Ryukyu Archipelago (southwestern Japan). Upogebia major, U. issae17i, and Austinogebia narutensis were not found in the Ryukyu Archipelago, whereas U. carinicanda and U. pugnax were collected only from the Ryukyus or warmer regions exposed to the Kuroshio Current. Upogebia yokoyai was collected al] over Japan and was the most common species in this study. From the viewpoint of habitat, U. yokoyai and U. issaeffi vyere unique in that the former was distributed mainly on brackish tidal flats and the latter mainly on boulder beaches. The identity of the upogebiid shrimp in some reports was corrected. KEY WORDS Thalassinidea / Upogebiidae / Upogebia / Austinogebia /distribution / tidal flat Introduction Mud shrimp of the farpily Upogebiidae are common burrowers in shallow waters worldwide (Dworschak, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Axiidea and Gebiidea (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Costa Rica
    ©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 115 37-55 Wien, März 2013 Axiidea and Gebiidea (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Costa Rica P. C. Dworschak* Abstract Axiidea and Gebiidea housed in the collections of the Museo de Zoologia, Universidad de Costa Rica, were studied together with newly collected material. Ninety-one lots were inspected; specimens of eleven lots newly identified; identifications of six lots have been revised. This resulted in twelve new records for Pacific Costa Rica (Aethogebia gorei, Axianassa mineri , Axiopsis baronai, Calocarides cf. quinqueseriatus, Covalaxius galapagensis, Corallianassa xutha, Neocallichinis cf. mortenseni, Paraxiopsis cf. spinipleura, Upogebia longipollex, Upogebia onychion, Upogebia tenuipollex, and Upogebia veleronis), mainly from Isla de Coco, and one new record for Caribbean Costa Rica ( Axiopsis serratifrons). Key words: Thalassinidea, Axiidea, Gebiidea, Costa Rica Introduction Axiidean and gebiidean shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda, formerly Thalassinidea) are among the most common macrofauna elements in the intertidal or the shallow subtidal (D w o r sc h a k , 2000, 2005). They have received special attention as their burrowing activity greatly influences the chemical and geophysical properties of sediments (Z iebis et al. 1996) and have therefore been identified as important ecosystem engineers (B er k en b u sc h & R o w d en 2003). The axiidean and gebiidean fauna of Costa Rica has been summarised as part of the decapod fauna (as Thalassinidea) by V a rg a s & C ortes (1999a) for the Caribbean and by V a r g a s & C ortes (1999b) for the Pacific coast. They list only two species for the Caribbean and 13 for the Pacific, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods Collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a Review 5-21 Ann
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 117B Autor(en)/Author(s): Dworschak Peter C. Artikel/Article: Methods collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a review 5-21 Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 117 5–21 Wien, Jänner 2015 Methods collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a review P.C. Dworschak* Abstract Axiidea and Gebiidae (formerly treated together as Thalassinidea) have a crypic lifestyle. Collecting these shrimp therefore requires special field methods. The present paper reviews these methods according to habitats and provides recommendations as well as data on their efficiency. In addition, information on the preservation of these animals is presented. Key words: Thalassinidea, Axiidea, Gebiidea, method, collecting, preservation Zusammenfassung Maulwurfskrebse aus den zwei Unterordungen der zehnfüßigen Krebes Axiidea und Gebiidea (früher zusammengefaßt als Thalassinidea) kommen in temperaten, subtropischen und tropischen Meeren vor und zeichnen sich durch ein Leben im Verborgenen aus. Viele Arten legen tiefe und ausgedehnte Bauten an. Diese Lebensweise erfordert eigene Methoden, um die Krebse zu fangen. Die verschiedenen Fangmethoden werden hier vorgestellt und Angaben zur Effizienz gemacht. Zusätzlich werden Angaben zur Fixierung und Konservierung der Krebse präsentiert. Introduction Formerly treated together as the thalassinideans, the infraorders Gebiidea DE SAINT LAURENT, 1979 and Axiidea DE SAINT LAURENT, 1979 represent two distinctly separate groups of decapods (ROBLES et al. 2009; BRACKEN et al. 2009; DWORSCHAK et al. 2012, POORE et al., 2014). They are commonly called mud shrimp or ghost shrimp, although they are only distantly related to true (dendrobranchiate or caridean) shrimp.
    [Show full text]
  • Upogebia Deltaura (Crustacea: Thalassinidea)
    25 September 1991 PROC. BIOL. SOC. WASH. 104(3), 1991, pp. 493-537 AN EXAMINATION OF THE SHRIMP FAMILY CALLIANIDEIDAE (CRUSTACEA: DECAPODA: THALASSINIDEA) Brian Kensley and Richard W. Heard Abstract.—One striking character was found to unite the members of the family Callianideidae, viz. the presence of rows of plumose setae, each seta sited in a pit, these rows being found on the carapace, abdominal pleura, and propodi of pereopods 2-4. Several new taxa are described: Crosniera, new genus (for Callianassa minima Rathbun, 1901); Michelea, new genus (for Cal- lianidea vandoverae Gore, 1987, Callianidea leura Poore & Griffin, 1979, Cal- lianidea lepta Sakai, 1987, plus the new species M. pillsburyi and M. lamellosa); Mictaxius, new genus (with the new species M. thalassicola); Marciisiaxius lemoscastroi Rodrigues & Carvalho, 1972, is redescribed, along with M. colpos, new species, while six species of Meticonaxius are discussed, with Meticonaxius bouvieri, new species described. A cladistic analysis of 11 taxa suggested that, within the Callianideidae, pleopodal respiratory filaments arose twice, that the linea thalassinica and the dentate ischial crest of maxilliped 3 have twice been lost, and that the Thomassinia-Crosniera-Mictaxius group of genera are most closely related to the Callianassidae. In the continuing effort to bring clarity to species of each described; the genus Tho- the systematics of the thalassinidean deca­ massinia is examined, along with the seem­ pods, individual genera and families are be­ ingly closely-related ^Callianassa'' minima ing examined in detail (e.g., Kensley 1989, and the new genus Mictaxius. Kensley & Heard 1990). Morphological For comparative purposes, material of the characters in particular are being reassessed, Pacific Callianidea typa H.
    [Show full text]
  • Currently Upogebia Capensis; Crustacea, Decapoda): Proposed Replacement of Neotype, So Conserving the Usage of Capensis and Also That of C
    Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 49(3) September 1992 Case 2827 Gebia major capensis Kraiiss, 1843 (currently Upogebia capensis; Crustacea, Decapoda): proposed replacement of neotype, so conserving the usage of capensis and also that of C. africana Ortmann, 1894 (currently Upogebia africana) N. Ngoc-Ho Laboratoire de Zoologie (Arthropodes), Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 61 rue de Buffon, 75231 Paris, France Gary C.B. Poore Department of Crustacea, Museum of Victoria, Swanston Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia Abstract. The purpose of this application is to conserve the accustomed usage of the specific names of two South African species of prawns: Upogebia capensis (Krauss, 1843) and U. africana (Ortmann, 1894). The latter species is commonly known as the mud-prawn or mud-shrimp. It is proposed to designate a replacement neotype for capensis from material of the species as presently understood; the previously designated neotype is a specimen oi africana. 1. Three species oi Gebia Leach, 1815 (p. 342; family UPOGEBIIDAE) were described from South Africa. Gebia major var. capensis Krauss, 1843 (p. 54) was originally described as a variety of Gebia major de Haan, [1841] (pi. 35, fig. 7; text (p. 165) published in [1849]; see Sherborn & Jentink (1895, p. 150) and Holthuis (1953, p. 37) for the dates of publication). The type material from Table Bay is now lost. The original description was short and by modern standards very incomplete and cannot be definitely reconciled with any single species known today. G. subspinosa Stimpson, 1860 (p. 22) was described from Simon's Bay; the fate of its type material is unknown.
    [Show full text]