Annual Report 2004/05
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lancaster House Venue Hire
Lancaster House Venue Hire “I have come from my house to your palace” —Queen Victoria Steeped in political history, discover magnificent Lancaster House with fabulous Louis XIV style interiors, stunning art collection, beautiful terrace and garden. Situated adjacent to Buckingham Palace, this historic house provides an impressive setting and first-class facilities for your event, reception, conference or other special occasion. The Grand Hall and Staircase On entering the house through the portico, the Grand Hall opens up to reveal a sweeping staircase and balustrade, in an echo of the Palace of Versailles. Both features are part of architect’s Benjamin Wyatt’s original design. Over the past two centuries numerous high-profile occasions have taken place here, from society banquets to international summits and receptions. With its ornate ceiling, marble walls and beautiful frescoes, the Grand Hall is a wonderful location to hold receptions, with a capacity of 200 available to experience the splendour of Lancaster House. To enquire about booking the Grand Hall and other fine rooms contact the team on +44 (0)20 7008 2711 from 0800–1700 Monday to Friday or email lancasterhouse. [email protected]. The Long Gallery More than 35 metres in length, the Long Gallery dominates the whole of the east side of the house. With 18 windows and a large ornate skylight, the room is filled with natural light. Winston Churchill gave a Coronation Banquet for the newly crowned Queen Elizabeth II here in June 1953. Long Gallery maximum capacities Reception Boardroom Theatre-style Seated meal 350 60* 200 150 *plus a further 120 people seated beside and behind table The Music Room With windows opening onto a balcony and recesses flanked by Corinthian columns, the music room is the wonderful venue for meetings, press briefings or formal dinners. -
St James Conservation Area Audit
ST JAMES’S 17 CONSERVATION AREA AUDIT AREA CONSERVATION Document Title: St James Conservation Area Audit Status: Adopted Supplementary Planning Guidance Document ID No.: 2471 This report is based on a draft prepared by B D P. Following a consultation programme undertaken by the council it was adopted as Supplementary Planning Guidance by the Cabinet Member for City Development on 27 November 2002. Published December 2002 © Westminster City Council Department of Planning & Transportation, Development Planning Services, City Hall, 64 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QP www.westminster.gov.uk PREFACE Since the designation of the first conservation areas in 1967 the City Council has undertaken a comprehensive programme of conservation area designation, extensions and policy development. There are now 53 conservation areas in Westminster, covering 76% of the City. These conservation areas are the subject of detailed policies in the Unitary Development Plan and in Supplementary Planning Guidance. In addition to the basic activity of designation and the formulation of general policy, the City Council is required to undertake conservation area appraisals and to devise local policies in order to protect the unique character of each area. Although this process was first undertaken with the various designation reports, more recent national guidance (as found in Planning Policy Guidance Note 15 and the English Heritage Conservation Area Practice and Conservation Area Appraisal documents) requires detailed appraisals of each conservation area in the form of formally approved and published documents. This enhanced process involves the review of original designation procedures and boundaries; analysis of historical development; identification of all listed buildings and those unlisted buildings making a positive contribution to an area; and the identification and description of key townscape features, including street patterns, trees, open spaces and building types. -
Lancaster House Agreement
SOUTHERN RHODESIA CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE HELD AT LANCASTER HOUSE, LONDON SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 1979 REPORT 1. Following the Meeting of Commonwealth Heads of Government held in Lusaka from 1 to 7 August, Her Majesty's Government issued invitations to Bishop Muzorewa and the leaders of the Patriotic Front to participate in a Constitutional Conference at Lancaster House. The purpose of the Conference was to discuss and reach agreement on the terms of an Independence Constitution, and that elections should be supervised under British authority to enable Rhodesia to proceed to legal independence and the parties to settle their differences by political means. 2. The Conference opened on 10 September under the chairmanship of Lord Carrington, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. The Conference concluded on 15 December, after 47 plenary sessions. A list of the official delegates to the Conference is at Annex A. The text of Lord Carrington's opening address is at Annex B, together with statements made by Mr Nkomo on behalf of his and Mr Mugabe's delegation and by Bishop Muzorewa on behalf of his delegation. 3. In the course of its proceedings the Conference reached agreement on the following issues: — Summary of the Independence Constitution (attached as Annex C to this report)* —arrangements for the pre-independence period (Annex D) —a cease-fire agreement signed by the parties (Annex E) 4. In concluding this agreement and signing this report the parties undertake: (a) to accept the authority of the Governor; (b) to abide by the Independence Constitution; (c) to comply with the pre-independence arrangements; (d) to abide by the cease-fire agreement; (e) to campaign peacefully and without intimidation; (f) to renounce the use of force for political ends; (g) to accept the outcome of the elections and instruct any forces under their authority to do the same. -
Annual Report 2004/5 Corrected
THE ROYAL COLLECTION TRUST Annual Report 201 0–2011 AIMS OF THE ROYAL COLLECTION TRUST In fulfilling the Trust’s objectives, the Trustees’ aims are to ensure that: • the Royal Collection (being the works of art held by The Queen in right of the crown and held in trust for her successors and for the nation) is subject to proper custodial control and that the works of art remain available to future generations; • the Royal Collection is maintained and conserved to the highest possible standards and that visitors can view the Collection in the best possible condition; • as much of the Royal Collection as possible can be seen by members of the public; • the Royal Collection is presented and interpreted so as to enhance public appreciation and understanding; • access to the Royal Collection is broadened and increased (subject to capacity constraints) to ensure that as many people as possible are able to view the Collection; • appropriate acquisitions are made when resources become available, to enhance the Collection and displays of exhibits for the public. When reviewing future activities, the Trustees ensure that these aims continue to be met and are in line with the Charity Commission’s General Guidance on public benefit. This report looks at the achievements of the previous 12 months and considers the success of each key activity and how it has helped enhance the benefit to the nation. FRONT COVER : Carl Haag (182 0–1915), Morning in the Highlands: the Royal Family ascending Lochnagar , 1853 (detail). A Christmas present from Prince Albert to Queen Victoria, the painting was included in the exhibition Victoria & Albert: Art & Love , at The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace, from March to December 2010. -
FURHTURE, TAPESTRY and EMBROIDERY of YESTERDAY AID TODAY MARLBOROUGH HOUSE Wednesday April 25™
ROYAL SCHOOL OF NEEDLEWORK Patron : H.M. QUEEN ELIZABETH THE QUEEN MOTHER LOAN EXHIBITION FURHTURE, TAPESTRY AND EMBROIDERY OF YESTERDAY AID TODAY MARLBOROUGH HOUSE Wednesday April 25™ TO Wednesday May 30™ PRICE 6 ° Ma r II)o ± ough ho use by Sir Owen Morshead. Whitehall Palace having been destroyed by fire in 1698, it was in St. James' Palace that Queen Anne set up her residence in 1702; and the Court of St. James' is still the term in official use to-day. Within a year she had created her Lord Privy Seal (John Sheffield) Duke of Buckingham, and he proceeded to erect for himself the big house looking down the length of the Mall which, rebuilt since, is known to us as Buckingham Palace. Shortly afterwards she allowed her Mistress of the Robes and close confidante, Sarah Duchess of Marlborough, to build the house in which the present exhibition is being held. From his campaign in the Low Countries the Duke had written to his wife: "You,know I never lik'd to build it at all. 'Tis not a proper Place for a great House. And I am sure," he added knowingly, "when you have built a little one you will not like it." The one which Sir Christopher Wren designed for her in 1709 is the present house minus the two top floors and certain additional rooms in the side wings. Built on so confined a site it has had to expand upwards, to the detriment of its appearance. The mettlesome Duchess was vexed by the inadequacy of its entrance from the street, and she resented too its domination by the houses in Pall Mall. -
The Chronicle Thursday
THE CHRONICLE THURSDAY. FEBRUARY 4, 1988 © DUKE UNIVERSITY DURHAM. NORTH CAROLINA CIRCULATION: 15,000 VOL. 83. NO. 93 Ticket Reagan to speak on campus Monday information By DAN BERGER all students who don't get tickets to the President Reagan will visit the Univer speech will come out to see the landing," Undergraduates: ASDU will distribute sity Monday to speak at a conference on he said. Several local high school bands 2,500 free tickets for President substance abuse, the White House an and community groups will also attend Reagan's speech to undergraduates nounced Wednesday. the ceremony at the landing site, Mizell presenting a student ID between 10 Reagan will address the conference said. He added that the men's basketball a.m. and 4 p.m. Thursday at the upper "Substance Abuse in the Workplace: team will likely participate in the fevet of the Bryan Center. Another dis Strategies for the 1990s," which is being program at the lacrosse field prior to the tribution table may be set up at the East sponsored by the University and the office president's landing and to a lesser extent Campus Union during the same hours, of North Carolina Gov. Jim Martin. The after he arrives. but a final decision will not be made un president's trip from Washington D.C. Before taking the dais, Reagan will hold til Thursday morning. Of the 2,500 tick will be made exclusively to attend the a closed meeting in Cameron with several ets, 750 will be allocated to East Cam event. community leaders affiliated with the pus. -
1901 Census of Thanet Places Enumerated, with Index
1901 Census of Thanet Places Enumerated, with Index Scope The complete Thanet Registration District, enumerated on the following pieces : • RG13/819 Acol, Birchington, Minster, Monkton, Sarre, St Nicolas, Stonar • RG13/820 Margate, Westgate • RG13/821 Margate • RG13/822 Margate • RG13/823 Margate • RG13/824 Margate • RG13/825 Ramsgate • RG13/826 Ramsgate • RG13/827 St Lawrence • RG13/828 Broadstairs, St Lawrence, St Peter • RG13/829 St Lawrence, St Peter This is a finding aid, and punctuation, capitalisation and spelling may have been changed. Arrangement The first part is in sections, each corresponding to an Enumeration District. The entries in each section give the place-related information for the district, arranged in columns : • piece & folio : used with the class number (RG13) to identify the original source • Dwellings and Buildings : names or descriptions of individual dwellings and buildings ~ also includes groups such as ‘cottages’ & ‘almshouses’ • Streets, Hamlets, etc : names used for groups of dwellings & buildings ~ as well as streets and hamlets, also includes places such as ‘courts’, ‘gardens’, ‘terraces’, ‘yards’, etc • parish : the ecclesiastical parish or district, abbreviated as noted below • location : the town or civil parish. In a some cases the information under this heading may be the only place-related data given in the original, and nothing is entered under ‘Dwellings’ or ‘Streets’ The second part (starting on page 75) is a combined Index of Dwellings and Streets, each entry giving piece and folio number(s). -
City of Port Phillip Heritage Review
City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Place name: B.A.L.M. Paints Factory Citation No: Administration Building 8 (former) Other names: - Address: 2 Salmon Street, Port Heritage Precinct: None Melbourne Heritage Overlay: HO282 Category: Factory Graded as: Significant Style: Interwar Modernist Victorian Heritage Register: No Constructed: 1937 Designer: Unknown Amendment: C29, C161 Comment: Revised citation Significance What is significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building, to the extent of the building as constructed in 1937 at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, is significant. This is in the European Modernist manner having a plain stuccoed and brick façade with fluted Art Deco parapet treatment and projecting hood to the windows emphasising the horizontality of the composition. There is a tower towards the west end with a flag pole mounted on a tiered base in the Streamlined Moderne mode and porthole motif constituting the key stylistic elements. The brickwork between the windows is extended vertically through the cement window hood in ornamental terminations. Non-original alterations and additions to the building are not significant. How is it significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne is of local historic, architectural and aesthetic significance to the City of Port Phillip. City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Citation No: 8 Why is it significant? It is historically important (Criterion A) as evidence of the importance of the locality as part of Melbourne's inner industrial hub during the inter-war period, also recalling the presence of other paint manufacturers at Port Melbourne including Glazebrooks, also in Williamstown Road. -
Base Document
SCHEDULE 6: List of retirement home developments sorted by reference to the Fairhold group company that owns the freehold Development Address 1. Theowal Limited Court Royal 1/30 (Excl No 13) TN4 8HT 1/30 Court Royal Eridge Road Tunbridge Wells Kent TN4 8HT 2. Fairhold Properties No.6 Limited Pegasus Court 1/25 LE16 7AP 1/25 Pegasus Court Leicester Road Market Harborough LE16 7AP Franklin Way 101/295 (odd) CR0 4UR Kelvin Gardens Croydon Surrey CR0 4UR 3. Fairhold Properties No.7 Limited Minster Court 1/20 WS13 6AB 1/20 Minster Court Bird Street Lichfield Staffordshire WS13 6AB 4. Fairhold Properties No.8 Limited Pegasus Court 1/43 OX12 9GZ 1/43 Pegasus Court Mill Street Wantage OX12 9GZ 5. Fairhold Mercury Limited Oxford Court 1/63 FY8 4EB 1/63 Oxford Court Oxford Road Lytham St Annes FY8 4EB Croft House 1/33 FY6 7AH 1/33 Croft House Grosvenor Road Poulton le Fylde FY6 7AH LON20771083/8 156186-0001 Development Address Lowry Court 2/38 SK14 6TG 2/38 Lowry Court Rushycroft Mottram-in-Longendale SK14 6TG 59/103 (excl) Chalet Estate NW7 4DL 59/103 Chalet Estate Hammers Lane Mill Hill NW7 4DL 6. Blackhouse Investment Properties Ltd. 128 Chalet Estate NW7 4DL 128 Chalet Estate Hammers Lane Mill Hill NW7 4DL 129 Chalet Estate NW7 4DL 129 Chalet Estate Hammers Lane Mill Hill NW7 4DL 7. Fairhold Homes Limited 1/15 Bucklers Mews SO41 8JL 1/15 Bucklers Mews Anchorage Way Lymington Hampshire SO41 8JL 2/62 Glendale CT20 1SH 2/62 Glendale The Bale Folkestone Kent CT20 1SH 1/45 London Court OX3 7SL 1/45 London Court London Road Headlington Oxfordshire -
Report of the Royal Trustees on the Sovereign Grant Review 2016
Sovereign Grant Act 2011: Report of the Royal Trustees on the Sovereign Grant Review 2016 November 2016 Sovereign Grant Act 2011: Report of the Royal Trustees on the Sovereign Grant Review 2016 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 7(4) of the Sovereign Grant Act 2011 November 2016 This document is available in large print, audio and braille on request. Please call +44 (0)20 7270 5000 or email public. [email protected] © Crown copyright 2016 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.3.0. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/version/3/ or email [email protected] Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/ publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] ISBN 978-1-911375-36-4 PU1988 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 2 Sovereign Grant Act 2011 5 Chapter 3 Sovereign Grant Review 2016 7 Chapter 4 Review of the financial management of the Sovereign Grant 9 2012-2016 Chapter 5 Expected costs for the next 5 year period 2016-2021 11 Chapter 6 Buckingham Palace reservicing 13 Chapter 7 Conclusions of the Sovereign Grant Review 19 Annex A Summary of Sovereign Grant income and expenditure 2012- 21 2016 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Since 1760, when George III agreed to surrender the net income of the Crown Estate to the Exchequer in return for a fixed annual payment, the government has provided financial support to the Sovereign. -
APTG GOES to the TOWER on 4 March Over Three Dozen Members of Twenty Different Travel Trade Organisations Came to See the Ceremony of the Keys As Guests of APTG
APTG GOES TO THE TOWER On 4 March over three dozen members of twenty different travel trade organisations came to see the Ceremony of the Keys as guests of APTG. They were hosted by a dozen guides, allowing us to share a very fine evening at the Tower and giving us a chance to show our special relationship with HRP and the Yeoman Warders. We funded drinks in the Yeoman Warders’ Club and each guide was given an up to date briefing before the event. This meant we could take the opportunity to explain the breadth of our knowledge, skills and languages combined with the ease of booking via the GuideLondon website. This is one of the ways your Branch Council is bringing work opportunities to APTG members. The evening was an uplifting experience and Yeoman Warder John Donald was a witty and knowledgeable host. The Ceremony was carried out by Gurkhas, commanded there for the first time by a female officer. The final, perfect ending came when the salute was taken by the Constable of the APTG Chair Nick Hancock and Yeoman Warder John Donald Tower General Sir Nicholas Houghton who, in his final words, made specific mention of guides being guests that night. Truly we have friends in high places! Over £300 was raised by the THE TOWER COMES TO APTG raffle for YW chosen charities and Nick Hancock gave an Yeoman Warder and Tower extra £250 from the Guild and APTG. Ravenmaster Chris Skaife (left) gave an entertaining presentation to APTG members MEMBERS OPEN MEETINGS before the March Members’ The next Members Open Meeting will be on Tuesday 9 Open Meeting at the Unite April at 6:30 pm in the Unite Office, WC1X 8TN. -
Montgomery County Reconnaissance Level Survey
UlT 51 \Þ1. ¡ .fCO M Ol.J MERY COL-I NTY J { : I €t þ"d {x',n:, t s @ t s ('- {'. HISTORIC SITES SLJRVEY VOLLJ ME 1 JULY, 1986 Montgomery County Reconnaissance Level Survey July, 1986 INTRODUCTION Since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1983, Montgomery County has experienced increased development and population growth. In light of this growth, the Planning Commission became aware of the need for a tool to help plan growth and still preserve the County's historical and architectural resources, The need to inventory these resources was evident. In 1985, Montgomery County applied and received a matching grant from the Division of Historic Landmarks to perform a Reconnaissance Level Survey of the County's architecturally significant buildings. This survey includes the following: 1) An Overview of the County's History 2) A Comprehensive Inventory of significant structures and sites in the County--including photographs and floor plans and; 3) Maps delineating the location of said structures and sites. It is anticipated that thfs survey will be a useful resource in future planning activities such as the evaluation of rezoning requests, the revision of the Comprehensive Plan and potential amendments of the County's Zoning Ordfnance to create a Historic District Overlay. Further, it will provide citizens interested in doing historical, archaeological. and genealogical research with valuable information. The following individuals contributed to the realization of this final report. Gibson Worsham, Architect Dan Pezzoni, Surveyor Charlotte Worsham, Architectural Historian David Rotenizer, President, New River Valley Chapter, Archeological Society of Virgdnia Frank Lorino Jeanie Maslich, Planning Department Secretary Valerie McBrayer, Secretary Bill Ruska, Planning Staff Nancy Ward, Planning Staff TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume I: Introduction Table of Contents Survey Methodology ...................................