Chip-Seq) How Is Biological Complexity Achieved?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chip-Seq) How Is Biological Complexity Achieved? Measuring Protein-DNA interactions using Chromatin Immunoprecipitation and NGS (ChIP-Seq) How is Biological Complexity Achieved? Mediated by Transcription Factors (TFs) 2 Introduction to Systems Biology Regulation of Gene Expression by Transcription Factors TF TF activation trans-acting TF factorsTF TF TF TF 1 2 3 cis-regulatory elements Gene repression 3 Introduction to Systems Biology The big point is: “…how these TFs orchestrate the expression of thousands of genes in a genome to create such a spectrum of biological diversity remains a mystery…” Several methods have been developed in the last several years to study TF-DNA interactions and to understand the function of TFs. 4 Introduction to Systems Biology HTP Methods for studying TF-DNA interactions • Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment - SELEX (obsolete) • Yeast-1-Hybrid (Y1H) • Bacterial-1-Hybrid (B1H) • Protein Binding Microarrays • Chromatin Immunoprecipitation followed by chip (ChIP-Chip) or followed by Sequencing (ChIP-Seq) 5 Introduction to Systems Biology How does ChIP-Seq work? TF is specifically bound to its cognate DNA sequence 6 Introduction to Systems Biology At any given time, my TF is bound in many locations 7 Introduction to Systems Biology Chromatin IP 8 Introduction to Systems Biology Chromatin IP 300 bp 9 Introduction to Systems Biology Next Generation Sequencing Let’s see this in action 10 Introduction to Systems Biology Sequencing and mapping of DNA fragments 300bp 5’ 3’ 37 bp So, what’s up with the remaining 263 bases? 11 Introduction to Systems Biology Sequencing and mapping of DNA fragments Chromosome 300bp But we only have 37bp of each 300 bp!!! 12 Introduction to Systems Biology ChIP-Seq 13 Introduction to Systems Biology ChIP-Seq allows for the analysis of more events • Since we do not use a pre-defined set of sequences to design and investigate a microarray, we can use ChIP-Seq to study many different types of protein-DNA interactions. • Additionally, modifications of ChIP have been designed to study DNA modifications such as DNA methylation, using met-DNA binding proteins. These methods are known as: – MRE-Seq (Methylation-sensitive Restriction Enzyme) – MeDIP-Seq (Methylated DNA Immuno Precipitation) 14 Introduction to Systems Biology Using ChIP-Seq to understand transcriptional processes 15 Introduction to Systems Biology Pol II => transcriptional events 16 Introduction to Systems Biology Pol II pausing and release factors => dynamics 17 Introduction to Systems Biology Super elongation complex => dynamics 18 Introduction to Systems Biology Histone modifications => Epigenetics 19 Introduction to Systems Biology Histone modifications => Epigenetics Type of Histone modification H3K4 H3K9 H3K14 H3K27 H3K79 H4K20 H2BK5 mono- activation activation activation activation activation activation methylation di-methylation repression repression activation activation, tri-methylation activation repression repression repression repression acetylation activation activation H3K4me3 is found in actively transcribed promoters, particularly just after the transcription start site. H3K9me3 is found in constitutively repressed genes. H3K27me is found in facultatively repressed genes. H3K36me3 is found in actively transcribed gene bodies. H3K9ac is found in actively transcribed promoters. H3K14ac is found in actively transcribed promoters. 20 Introduction to Systems Biology Mediator and Cohesin complexes => Chromatin structure 21 Introduction to Systems Biology Polycomb and Trithorax => repressed/active promoters 22 Introduction to Systems Biology All of these can be brought together to give us a complete picture Scale 2 kb syboss_mm9 chr17: 35,641,500 35,642,000 35,642,500 35,643,000 35,643,500 35,644,000 35,644,500 35,645,000 35,645,500 35,646,000 35,646,500 35,647,000 35,647,500 35,648,000 35,648,500 35,649,000 35,649,500 User Supplied Track User Track TopHat junctions junctions RefSeq Genes Pou5f1 Tcf19 Pou5f1 Tcf19 Tcf19 Repeating Elements by RepeatMasker RepeatMasker Mouse mRNAs from GenBank AB375278 BC004617 M34381 AK004231 AK145321 AK088479 BC068268 AK077414 AB221654 AK078697 X52437 AK207827 AB375276 AB375269 AB375270 AB375272 AB375271 AB375273 AB375277 HM346525 HM346526 AB375274 AB375275 197 _ RNA-seq Xiao2012 d0_RNA_seq_1_Xiao2012 1 _ 112 _ Pol_II Pol_II_0hr_Lin2011 1 _ 93 _ Poll II Pause Spt5_Rahl2010 1 _ 145 _ Poll II Pause NelfA_Rahl2010 1 _ 44 _ Poll II Pause Ctr9_Rahl2010 1 _ 73 _ Super Elongation Complex AFF4_0hr_Lin2011 1 _ 23 _ Super Elongation Complex Cdk9_0hr_Lin2011 1 _ 77 _ Super Elongation Complex ELL2_0hr_Lin2011 1 _ 144 _ Transcription Factors TAF1_Xiao2012 1 _ 104 _ Mediator Med1_Kagey2010 1 _ 161 _ Mediator Med12_Kagey2010 1 _ 142 _ Cohesin Nipbl_Kagey2010 1 _ 145 _ Cohesin Smc1_Kagey2010 1 _ 154 _ Cohesin Smc3_Kagey2010 1 _ 201 _ Cohesin Rad21_Nitzsche2011 1 _ 50 _ Transcription Factors Oct4 1 _ 69 _ Transcription Factors Nanog_Chen2008 1 _ 68 _ Transcription Factors Sox2_Chen2008 1 _ 57 _ Transcription Factors Essrb_Chen2008 1 _ 144 _ Transcription Factors Tcfcp2l1_Chen2008 1 _ 63 _ Transcription Factors Klf4_Chen2008 1 _ 37 _ Transcription Factors CTCF_Chen2008 1 _ 39 _ Transcription Factors cMyc_Chen2008 1 _ 131 _ Transcription Factors E2f1_Chen2008 1 _ 297 _ Transcription Factors iFlag_Hoxc9_d5_Mazzoni2011 1 _ 296 _ Transcription Factors Rfx1_np_Creyghton2010 1 _ 155 _ Transcription Factors REST_Rahl2011 1 _ 180 _ Transcription Factors CTCF_Handoko2011 1 _ 59 _ Transcription Factors Cdx2_Nishiyama2009 1 _ 183 _ Transcription Factors Olig2_d4_Mazzoni2011 1 _ 69 _ Transcription Factors Zfx1_Chen2008 1 _ 45 _ Transcription Factors n_Myc_Chen2008 1 _ 59 _ Transcription Factors iHoxc9_V5_Mazzoni2011 1 _ 58 _ Transcription Factors Stat3_Chen2008 1 _ 72 _ TF Co-Factors MCAF1_Rahl2011 1 _ 75 _ Chromation Organisation and Remodeling CHD7_Schnetz2010 1 _ 239 _ Chromation Organisation and Remodeling Lamin_B_Handoko2011 1 _ 75 _ Histone Modifiers p300_Schnetz2010 1 _ 70 _ Histone Modifiers Eset_Yuan2009 1 _ 148 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H3K27ac_Xiao2012 1 _ 198 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H3K27me3_Xiao2012 1 _ 136 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H3K36me3_Xiao2012 1 _ 128 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H3K4me1_Xiao2012 1 _ 128 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H3K4me2_Xiao2012 1 _ 369 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H3K4me3_Xiao2012 1 _ 206 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 d0_H2AZ_Xiao2012 1 _ 255 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 MeDIP_seq_Xiao2012 1 _ 12 _ Chromatin State Xiao2012 MRE_seq_Xiao2012 1 _ 212 _ Trithorax Dpy_30_Jiang2011 1 _ 64 _ Trithorax Rbpp5_Ang2011 1 _ 69 _ Trithorax 23 Wdr5_Ang2011 1 _ 59 _ Trithorax WDR5_FL_Ang2011 1 _ 123 _ Polycomb Introduction to Systems Biology Ring1b_Rahl2011 1 _ 24 Introduction to Systems Biology 25 Introduction to Systems Biology Analysing ChIP-Seq data Analysis pipeline 27 Introduction to Systems Biology Analysis pipeline 28 Introduction to Systems Biology Analysis pipeline sratoolkit FastQC fastx-toolkit Commonto almostall NGS pipelines bowtie ChIP-Seq specific 29 Introduction to Systems Biology Analysis pipeline Automated Humanintervention Requires 30 Introduction to Systems Biology Alignment to genome • As for any other NGS application, we need to align our reads to a base genome. • ChIP-Seq uses bowtie • For ChIP-Seq we only want uniquely mapped sequences and allowing up to 2 mismatches – Usual parameters are –m 1 –n 2 –e 70 –l 28 Peak calling! • Mostly used algorithm is MACS (Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq) – http://liulab.dfci.harvard.edu/MACS/index.html Simple description: Usually stringent threshold required for low false discovery rates (FDRs) due to the correction for multiple testing Peak calling! – MACS allows for the calling of peaks using a background (control) track or against reactions performed in different conditions Scale 100 kb chr6: 122600000 122650000 122700000 122750000 Consensus CDS CCDS Ensembl Genes Ensembl Genes RefSeq Genes Apobec1 Dppa3 Nanog Slc2a3 Apobec1 Nanogpd Gdf3 MicroRNAs from miRBase miRNA Gap Locations Gap Mouse mRNAs from GenBank Mouse mRNAs HEK4me3 - Marson2008 HEK4me3 c-Myc - Chen008 c-Myc Klf4 - Chen008 Klf4 Sox2 - Chen2008 Sox2 STAT3 - Chen2008 STAT3 Zfx - Chen2008 Zfx H3K36me3 - Marson2008 H3K36me3 WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN??? 217.431 _ H3K79me2 - Marson2008 H3K79me2 0 _ 227.795 _ Marson2008_macs14 Nanog_mES_rep2 0.0007 _ Tcf3 - Marson2008 Tcf3 Suz12 - Marson2008 Suz12 Suz12 - Chen2008 Suz12 CTCF - Chen2008 CTCF E2f1 - Chen008 E2f1 GFP - Chen2008 GFP Nanog - Chen008 Nanog Oct4 - Chen2008 Oct4 p300 - Chen2008 p300 Smad - Chen2008 Smad Tcfcp2I - Chen008 Tcfcp2I s_2_1_J1_ES_hMeDIP_1 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_2_1_J1_ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_2_1_Np95___ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_1_Np95___ES_MeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_2_2_J1_ES_hMeDIP_1 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_2_2_J1_ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_2_2_Np95___ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_2_ES_J1_mRNA_Seq Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_1_J1_ES_MeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_2_J1_ES_MeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_1_pMEF_MeDIP Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_1_Tet1_Tet2_KD_ES_hMeDIP_1 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_2_Np95___ES_MeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_2_pMEF_MeDIP Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_2_Tet1_Tet2_KD_ES_hMeDIP_1 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_1_E14_ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_1_Tet1_Tet2_KD_ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_2_E14_ES_hMeDIP_1 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_2_E14_ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_2_Tet1_Tet2_KD_ES_hMeDIP_2 Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_Mock_KD_ES_J1_2_mRNA_Seq Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_3_Mock_KD_ES_J1_1_mRNA_Seq Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_6_Mock_KD_ES_J1_3_mRNA_Seq Fics2011_MeDIP-Seq s_4_Tet1_2_KD_ES_J1_1_mRNA_Seq
Recommended publications
  • The Histone Methyltransferase DOT1L Prevents Antigen-Independent
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/826255; this version posted November 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. The histone methyltransferase DOT1L prevents antigen-independent differentiation and safeguards epigenetic identity of CD8+ T cells Eliza Mari Kwesi-Maliepaard1*, Muhammad Assad Aslam2,3*, Mir Farshid Alemdehy2*, Teun van den Brand4, Chelsea McLean1, Hanneke Vlaming1, Tibor van Welsem1, Tessy Korthout1, Cesare Lancini1, Sjoerd Hendriks1, Tomasz Ahrends5, Dieke van Dinther6, Joke M.M. den Haan6, Jannie Borst5, Elzo de Wit4, Fred van Leeuwen1,7,#, and Heinz Jacobs2,# 1Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, 60800 Multan, Pakistan 4Division of Gene Regulation, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, and Oncode Institute, The Netherlands 5Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066CX Amsterdam, and Oncode Institute, The Netherlands 6Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands 7Department of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, UvA, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands * These authors contributed equally to this work. # Equal contribution and corresponding authors [email protected]; [email protected] Lead contact: Fred van Leeuwen 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/826255; this version posted November 18, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diverse Functions of Dot1 and H3K79 Methylation
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 8, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press REVIEW The diverse functions of Dot1 and H3K79 methylation Anh Tram Nguyen1,2 and Yi Zhang1,2,3 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815, USA; 2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA DOT1 (disruptor of telomeric silencing; also called ute to transcriptional regulation is to serve as a platform Kmt4) was initially discovered in budding yeast in a genetic for the recruitment of effector proteins. The well-studied screen for genes whose deletion confers defects in telo- lysine methylation residues include K4, K9, K27, K36, meric silencing. Since the discovery ~10 years ago that and K79 of histone H3, and K20 of histone H4. In general, Dot1 and its mammalian homolog, DOT1L (DOT1-Like), methylation at H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20 correlates with possess histone methyltransferase activity toward histone transcriptional repression, while methylation at H3K4, H3 Lys 79, great progress has been made in characterizing H3K36, and H3K79 correlates with gene transcription their enzymatic activities and the role of Dot1/DOT1L- (Kouzarides 2002; Peterson and Laniel 2004; Martin and mediated H3K79 methylation in transcriptional regula- Zhang 2005). In addition to its role in transcriptional tion, cell cycle regulation, and the DNA damage response. regulation, methylation has also been linked to X inacti- In addition, gene disruption in mice has revealed that vation, cell fate determination, terminal differentiation, mouse DOT1L plays an essential role in embryonic de- and the spatiotemporal patterning of Hox genes (Cavalli velopment, hematopoiesis, cardiac function, and the de- 2006; Minard et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Transcription-Dependent H3k36me3 Marking by the SETD2:IWS1:SPT6 Ternary Complex
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/636084; this version posted May 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Dynamics of transcription-dependent H3K36me3 marking by the SETD2:IWS1:SPT6 ternary complex Katerina Cermakova1, Eric A. Smith1, Vaclav Veverka2, H. Courtney Hodges1,3,4,* 1 Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Center for Precision Environmental Health, and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA 2 Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic 3 Center for Cancer Epigenetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA 4 Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX, 77005, USA * Lead contact; Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract The genome-wide distribution of H3K36me3 is maintained SETD2 contributes to gene expression by marking gene through various mechanisms. In human cells, H3K36 is bodies with H3K36me3, which is thought to assist in the mono- and di-methylated by eight distinct histone concentration of transcription machinery at the small portion methyltransferases; however, the predominant writer of the of the coding genome. Despite extensive genome-wide data trimethyl mark on H3K36 is SETD21,11,12. Interestingly, revealing the precise localization of H3K36me3 over gene SETD2 is a major tumor suppressor in clear cell renal cell bodies, the physical basis for the accumulation, carcinoma13, breast cancer14, bladder cancer15, and acute maintenance, and sharp borders of H3K36me3 over these lymphoblastic leukemias16–18. In these settings, mutations sites remains rudimentary.
    [Show full text]
  • 16-0368 Technical Data Sheet
    Nucleosome, Recombinant Human, H3K79me2 dNuc, Biotinylated Catalog No. 16-0368 Lot No. 19045001 Pack Size 50 µg Product Description: 1 2 Mononucleosomes assembled from recombinant human histones expressed in E. coli (two each of histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4; accession numbers: H2A-P04908; H2B- O60814; H3.1-P68431; H4-P62805) wrapped by 147 base pairs of 601 positioning sequence DNA. Histone H3 (created by a proprietary synthetic method) contains dimethyl-lysine at position 79. The nucleosome is the basic subunit of chromatin. The 601 sequence, identified by Lowary and Widom, is a 147-base pair sequece that has high affinity for histone octamers and is useful for nucleosome assembly and contains a 5’ biotin-TEG group. Western Blot Data: Western Analysis of Nucleosome, Recombinant Human, H3K79me2. Top Panel: Unmodified H3 Formulation: (Lane 1) and H3K79me2 containing nucleosomes (Lane 2) were Nucleosome, Recombinant Human, H3K79me2 (27.3 µg probed with an anti-H3K79me2 antibody and analyzed via ECL protein weight, 50 µg total weight) in µl of 10 mM Tris readout. Only the H3K79me2sample produced a detectable signal. HCl, pH 7.5, 25 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 20% Bottom Panel: Detailfrom Coomassie stained gel showing glycerol. unmodified nucleosomes (Lane 1) and H3K79me2 nucleosomes Molarity = μmolar. MW = Da. (Lane 2). Storage and Stability: Stable for six months at -80°C from date of receipt. For best results, aliquot and avoid multiple freeze/thaws. Application Notes: Nucleosome, Recombinant Human, H3K79me2 dNucs are highly purified and are suitable for use as substrates in enzyme screening assays or for effector protein binding experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Le G´Enome En Action
    LEGENOME´ EN ACTION SEQUENC´ ¸ AGE HAUT DEBIT´ ET EPIG´ ENOMIQUE´ Epig´enomique´ ? IFT6299 H2014 ? UdeM ? Mikl´osCs}ur¨os Regulation´ d’expression la transcription d’une region´ de l’ADN necessite´ ? liaisons proteine-ADN´ (facteur de transcription et son site reconnu) ? accessibilite´ de la chromatine REVIEWS Identification of regions that control transcription An initial step in the analysis of any gene is the identifi- cation of larger regions that might harbour regulatory control elements. Several advances have facilitated the prediction of such regions in the absence of knowl- edge about the specific characteristics of individual cis- Chromatin regulatory elements. These tools broadly fall into two categories: promoter (transcription start site; TSS) and enhancer detection. The methods are influenced Distal TFBS by sequence conservation between ORTHOLOGOUS genes (PHYLOGENETIC FOOTPRINTING), nucleotide composition and the assessment of available transcript data. Functional regulatory regions that control transcrip- tion rates tend to be proximal to the initiation site(s) of transcription. Although there is some circularity in the Co-activator complex data-collection process (regulatory sequences are sought near TSSs and are therefore found most often in these regions), the current set of laboratory-annotated regula- tory sequences indicates that sequences near a TSS are Transcription more likely to contain functionally important regulatory initiation complex Transcription controls than those that are more distal. However, specifi- initiation cation of the position of a TSS can be difficult. This is fur- ther complicated by the growing number of genes that CRM Proximal TFBS selectively use alternative start sites in certain contexts. Underlying most algorithms for promoter prediction is a Figure 1 | Components of transcriptional regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Circrnas Expression Pattern with Integrated Sequence And
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/392019; this version posted August 15, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Modeling circRNAs expression pattern with integrated sequence and 2 epigenetic features identifies H3K79me2 as regulators for circRNAs 3 expression 4 Jia-Bin Chen1#, Shan-Shan Dong1#, Shi Yao1, Yuan-Yuan Duan1, Wei-Xin Hu1, Hao 5 Chen1, Nai-Ning Wang1, Ruo-Han Hao1, Ming-Rui Guo1, Yu-Jie Zhang1, Yu Rong1, Yi- 6 Xiao Chen1, Hlaing Nwe Thynn1, Fu-Ling Zhou2, Yan Guo1*, Tie-Lin Yang1* 7 8 Running title: Exploring circRNAs expression regulatory mechanism 9 10 1Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, 11 School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, P. R. 12 China 13 2Department of Hematopathology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 14 430071, P. R. China 15 16 #These authors contribute equally to this work. 17 The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first 2 authors should be 18 regarded as joint First Authors 19 20 *Corresponding Authors: 21 Tie-Lin Yang, Ph.D. 22 Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, 23 School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, P. R. 24 China 25 Tel: 86-29-82668463 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/392019; this version posted August 15, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthetic Histone Code
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Synthetic histone code 1 2 3 Wolfgang Fischle , Henning D Mootz and Dirk Schwarzer Chromatin is the universal template of genetic information in all copies each of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 eukaryotic cells. This complex of DNA and histone proteins not and one copy of linker histone H1, Figure 1a) [1]. By only packages and organizes genomes but also regulates gene various levels of folding, the originating primary chroma- expression. A multitude of posttranslational histone tin fiber can be organized into various structural arrange- modifications and their combinations are thought to constitute ments, including highly condensed mitotic chromosomes a code for directing distinct structural and functional states of (Figure 1b). While the basic architecture of nucleosomes chromatin. Methods of protein chemistry, including protein is the same throughout the genome, posttranslational semisynthesis, amber suppression technology, and cysteine modifications (PTMs) of histones are central means of bioconjugation, have enabled the generation of so-called increasing the biochemical divergence that regulates designer chromatin containing histones in defined and chromatin structure and function [2,3]. Histone PTMs homogeneous modification states. Several of these are structurally diverse and include methylation, acetyla- approaches have matured from proof-of-concept studies into tion and ubiquitinylation of lysine, as well as phosphor- efficient tools and technologies for studying the biochemistry of ylation of serine and threonine residues (Figure 1c). More chromatin regulation and for interrogating the histone code. We than 150 histone modification sites have been identified summarize pioneering experiments and recent developments in different experimental systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromatin Poises Mirna- and Protein-Coding Genes for Expression
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Letter Chromatin poises miRNA- and protein-coding genes for expression Artem Barski,1,2 Raja Jothi,1,2,3 Suresh Cuddapah,1,2 Kairong Cui,1 Tae-Young Roh,1,4 Dustin E. Schones,1 and Keji Zhao1,5 1Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA Chromatin modifications have been implicated in the regulation of gene expression. While association of certain mod- ifications with expressed or silent genes has been established, it remains unclear how changes in chromatin environment relate to changes in gene expression. In this article, we used ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation with massively parallel sequencing) to analyze the genome-wide changes in chromatin modifications during activation of total human CD4+ T cells by T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Surprisingly, we found that the chromatin modification patterns at many induced and silenced genes are relatively stable during the short-term activation of resting T cells. Active chromatin modifications were already in place for a majority of inducible protein-coding genes, even while the genes were silent in resting cells. Similarly, genes that were silenced upon T-cell activation retained positive chromatin modifications even after being silenced. To investigate if these observations are also valid for miRNA-coding genes, we systematically identified promoters for known miRNA genes using epigenetic marks and profiled their expression patterns using deep sequencing. We found that chromatin modifications can poise miRNA-coding genes as well. Our data suggest that miRNA- and protein-coding genes share similar mechanisms of regulation by chromatin modifications, which poise inducible genes for activation in response to environmental stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • S41467-017-02759-8.Pdf
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02759-8 OPEN Dot1 regulates nucleosome dynamics by its inherent histone chaperone activity in yeast Soyun Lee1, Seunghee Oh1, Kwiwan Jeong2, Hyelim Jo1, Yoonjung Choi1, Hogyu David Seo1, Minhoo Kim1, Joonho Choe1, Chang Seob Kwon3 & Daeyoup Lee1 Dot1 (disruptor of telomeric silencing-1, DOT1L in humans) is the only known enzyme responsible for histone H3 lysine 79 methylation (H3K79me) and is evolutionarily conserved 1234567890():,; in most eukaryotes. Yeast Dot1p lacks a SET domain and does not methylate free histones and thus may have different actions with respect to other histone methyltransferases. Here we show that Dot1p displays histone chaperone activity and regulates nucleosome dynamics via histone exchange in yeast. We show that a methylation-independent function of Dot1p is required for the cryptic transcription within transcribed regions seen following disruption of the Set2–Rpd3S pathway. Dot1p can assemble core histones to nucleosomes and facilitate ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling activity through its nucleosome-binding domain, in vitro. Global analysis indicates that Dot1p appears to be particularly important for histone exchange and chromatin accessibility on the transcribed regions of long-length genes. Our findings collectively suggest that Dot1p-mediated histone chaperone activity controls nucleosome dynamics in transcribed regions. 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea. 2 Biocenter, Gyeonggi Business
    [Show full text]
  • Histone H3 (Di-Methyl K79) Quantification Kit (Fluorometric)
    ab115086 – Histone H3 (di-methyl K79) Quantification Kit (Fluorometric) Instructions for Use For the measurement of global H3K79me2 This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use. Version 1a Last Updated 22 February 2019 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1. BACKGROUND 2 2. ASSAY SUMMARY 3 GENERAL INFORMATION 3. PRECAUTIONS 4 4. STORAGE AND STABILITY 4 5. MATERIALS SUPPLIED 5 6. MATERIALS REQUIRED, NOT SUPPLIED 5 7. LIMITATIONS 6 8. TECHNICAL HINTS 6 ASSAY PREPARATION 9. REAGENT PREPARATION 7 10. SAMPLE PREPARATION 7 ASSAY PROCEDURE 11. ASSAY PROCEDURE 9 DATA ANALYSIS 12. ANALYSIS 10 RESOURCES 13. TROUBLESHOOTING 11 14. NOTES 12 Discover more at www.abcam.com 1 INTRODUCTION 1. BACKGROUND Epigenetic activation or inactivation of genes plays a critical role in many important human diseases, especially in cancer. A major mechanism for epigenetic inactivation of the genes is methylation of CpG islands in genome DNA caused by DNA methyltransferases. Histone methyltransferases (HMTs) control or regulate DNA methylation through chromatin-dependent transcription repression or activation. HMTs transfer 1-3 methyl groups from S-adenosyl-L-methionine to the lysine and arginine residues of histone proteins. Dot1 is a histone methyltransferase that catalyzes methylation of histone H3 at lysine 79 (H3K79) in mammalian cells. H3K79 di-methylation is a widespread histone modification and is associated with transcriptionally active genes. Increased global H3K79 di-methylation is also found to be involved in some pathological processes such as leukemogenesis in human. The global H3K79 di-methylation can also be changed by inhibition or activation of HMTs. Thus, quantitative detection of global H3K79me2 would provide useful information for better understanding epigenetic regulation of gene activation and for developing HMT-targeted drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • SETDB1 Mediated Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation Suppresses MLL-Fusion Target Expression and Leukemic Transformation
    Acute Myeloid Leukemia SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX SETDB1 mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation suppresses MLL-fusion target expression and leukemic transformation James Ropa, 1,2 Nirmalya Saha, 1* Hsiangyu Hu, 1* Luke F. Peterson, 3 Moshe Talpaz 3 and Andrew G. Muntean 1 1Department of Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School; 2Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, Univer - sity of Michigan Medical School and 3Department of Internal Medicine/Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Abor, MI, USA *NS and HH contributed equally as co-second authors. ©2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation. This is an open-access paper. doi:10.3324/haematol. 2019.223883 Received: April 4, 2019. Accepted: September 25, 2019. Pre-published: September 26, 2019. Correspondence: ANDREW G. MUNTEAN - [email protected] Supplemental Methods and Figures Leukemia colony formation assay Cells were retrovirally transduced as described above. They were then seeded at a density of 1x103 cells in 2mL semi-solid methylcellulose medium for mouse cells (STEMCELL M3234) containing selection antibiotics (1mg/mL G418 and 1ug/mL puromycin or 100ug/mL hygromycin), 10 ng/mL IL-3, GM-CSF, and IL-6 and 100ng/uL SCF (R&D). Colonies were counted, pooled, and replated in the same way for two additional rounds of colony formation and counting. 1x images of the 5-phenyl tetrazolium chloride (INT) stained dishes were taken after round 2. HSPC colony formation Mouse bone marrow was harvested and lineage depletion was performed using the Hematopoeitic Progenitor Isolation Kit (STEMCELL) or CD34+ cells were isolated from mobilized blood. One group of mouse cells were transduced with shRNA against SETDB1 as previously described.
    [Show full text]
  • Histone Methylation: It's in the Numbers
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Hoxa7–10 cluster, whereas H3K79me1 levels were the same or increased. A genome-wide analysis of H3K79me1 and H3K79me2 levels showed that Lara Crow / NPG Crow Lara genes with decreased H3K79me2 and increased H3K79me1 levels were enriched for MLL–AF9 target genes. Indeed, Af10 deletion affected the ratio of H3K79me1:H3K79me2 at most of the 129 MLL–AF9 target genes and restored H3K79 methyl­ EPIGENETICS ation levels to those observed in cells that do not express MLL–AF9. The Histone methylation: it’s in the numbers expression of most of the MLL–AF9 target genes was reduced in these The expression of homeobox (HOX) HOXA genes is driven by the conver- cells, although there were some proteins, which are important regula- sion of H3K79me1 to H3K79me2 and exceptions. DOT1L occupancy of tors of developmental transcription H3K79me3, and that H3K79me1 is Hoxa7–10 was reduced in Af10–/– cells programmes, is altered in approxi- insufficient to sustain high levels of expressing MLL–AF9, whereas mately 50% of cases of acute myeloid gene expression. MLL–AF9 occupancy was unaffected. leukaemia (AML). In particular, the Next, the authors investigated In addition, the DOT1L–AF10 com- expression of the HOXA cluster is how H3K79me1 conversion to higher plex had much higher activity than altered in AML with mixed-lineage methylation states was regulated. DOT1L alone in an in vitro histone leukaemia (MLL) rearrangements, Having excluded a role for changes in methyltransferase assay. and misdirection of DOT1L — a his- DOT1L expression, they investigated Finally, the authors showed that tone methyltransferase that catalyses whether a cofactor might enhance NUP98–NSD1-transformed LSKs in histone H3 lysine 79 (H3K79) methy­ DOT1L recruitment and activity.
    [Show full text]