DOCSLIB.ORG

Through the Lens of A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Through the Lens of A How well does the depiction of God and humanity inJoseph SmithS King Follett Discourse and Lorenzo SnowSfamous "coupletnfit with traditional Christian views of Christ and the Atonement- or even with thosefound in the Book of Mormon? Must Latter-day Saints choose between them? THEOLOGY AND CHRISTOLOGY THROUGHTHE LENS OF A By L. Rex Sears HEN BYU RELIGION PROFESSOR STEPHEN E. and may be responding by moving the Church away from its Robinson collaborated with an evangelical King Follett heritage. Christian to write How Wide the Divide?, he de- voted his contributions to minimizing Mormon departures "THE FIRST PRINCIPLE OF TRUTH from more orthodox forms of ~hristianit~.'Judging from AND OF THE GOSPEL" Robinson's position and influence, we have come a long way from our nineteenth-century heritage of glorylng in alienation N THE KING Follett Discourse he delivered shortly before from mainstream Christianity For my part, I suspect that we his death, Joseph Smith taught the Saints, as "the first have never fully appreciated how wide the divide really is-or I principle of truth and of the Gospel," that God "once was might be, if we took our founding prophet at his word. If ac- a man like one of us and that God Himself, the Father of us all, cepted, Joseph Smith's later teachings have implications, unap- once dwelled on an earth the same as Jesus Christ himself did preciated perhaps by the Prophet himself, which could place in the flesh and like "God Himself who sits enthroned in us even further from the biblical Christian tradition than the yonder heavens is a Man like unto one of yourselves-that is Mormon firebrands of the nineteenth century recognized. the great ~ecret!"~ Over the years, observers on both sides of the divide have According to Smith, this "great secret" is the key to under- remarked that the theology Joseph taught in the King Follett standing "the designs of God for the human race, the relation Discourse fits poorly, or not at all, with orthodox Christianity's the human family sustains with God, and why He interferes notions of humanity, deity, and their relations one with an- with the affairs of man."5 God is "a man" like us, and our des- other. But I think observers on the Mormon side, in particular, tiny as "joint-heirs with Jesus Christ" is "to inherit and enjoy have shown little awareness that King Follett teachings may the same glory, powers, and exaltation until you ascend a have decisive consequences for the central Christian doctrine throne of eternal power and arrive at the station of a God, the of Atonement as well. As I argue here, reasonable elaborations same as those who have gone bef~re.'~ of the discourse's teachings undercut certain lines of You have got to learn how to make yourselves Gods in Atonement theory and render competing lines superfluous. order to save yourselves and be kings and priests to Eugene England characterized the perfect and loving, yet God, the same as all Gods have done-by going from limited divinity of the Mormon theology he loved as the a small capacity to a great capacity, from a small de- "weeping God of ~ormonism."~I share England's taste in the- gree to another, from grace to grace, until the resur- ology, but unlike him, I am not sure we can keep our weeping rection of the dead, from exaltation to exaltation-till God and still maintain our membership in the wider Christian you are able to sit in everlasting burnings and ever- fraternity And although those in authority may not have con- lasting power and glory as those who have gone be- sciously acknowledged the tension, I think they may sense it fore, sit enthroned.' Thus Joseph Smith explains God's interest in human affairs: L. REX SEARS is an attorney practicing in Salt God has trodden the same eternal path as we; and just as his Lake City. He has a Ph.D. in philosophy from forebears have done (and we shall yet do), God desires to raise Haward University, where he wrote his disserta- up yet another generation of gods-just like generation after tion on Mormon theology. generation of human beings eagerly bear and rear offspring. PAGE 34 APRIL 2002 SUNSTONE I consider the parental model of divinity set forth in joseph Smith i discourse and Lorenzo Snow's couplet to be incompatible with guilty monotheistic piety that teaches us to feel hopelessly and inescapably dependent on and indebted to a mercifully condescending creator. For Joseph Smith, then, the reason for God's participation in great creator. As the objects of such condescending mercy, we human affairs is captured in Lorenzo Snow's couplet: "As man can only assume toward our god a position analogous to is, God once was. As God is, man may become." supine prostration. King Benjamin espouses something like In a newspaper interview a few years ago, President this in his famous sermon: Hinckley publicly dismissed Snow's teaching as "a little cou- And now, in the first place, he hath created you, and plet," "more of a couplet than anything else," that "gets into granted unto you your lives, for which ye are in- some pretty deep theology that we don't know very much debted unto him. And secondly, he doth require that about."' Personally, I do not think the theology involved is all ye should do as he hath commanded you; for which if that deep-if by deep, we mean obscure or difficult; the doc- ye do, he doth immediately bless you; and therefore trine is certainly profound but not deep in that other sense. he hath paid you. And ye are still indebted unto him, In a more recent interview, President Hinckley gave the and are, and will be, forever and ever; therefore, of same treatment to another ideological derelict from our past. what have ye to boast? (Mosiah 2:23-25) He attributed to Brigham Young the statement that "If you I wonder if, at some level, those who are uncomfortable went to Heaven and saw God it would be Adam and Eve," and with Joseph Smith's later teachings might regard accepting this commented, "I don't know what he meant by that."9 In both sense of worthlessness as a form of payment for the aid of the cases, rather than acknowledge that earlier prophets taught supreme being McMumn talks about, the one who holds the what they appeared to teach, President Hinckley concludes whole world in his hands. Based upon my own development, that their statements are difficult or obscure and cannot be ac- I suspect that some people have an unarticulated fear that this cepted at face value.'' I think that the similarity of President being might abandon them if they do not exhibit and preach Hinckley's treatment of the little couplet and Adam-God bodes such guilty monotheistic piety ill for the future of the couplet. But I do not think this piety fits with the model of divinity President Hinckley followed his remarks about the couplet espoused by Joseph Smith. If we take the Prophet's model seri- with a tempered endorsement of the idea that we can become ously, we must modify or abandon some of our more self-dep- as God is, which suggests that his reservations center primarily recating religious notions. on the first teaching of the couplet, that God was once as we are now l1 Several decades earlier, influential Apostle Anthon TO SHARE KNOWLEDGE, POWER, AND GLORY H. Lund had similarly confided to his journal that he did not "like to think of a time when there was no ~od."'~Sterling M. OSEPH SMITH TEACHES us to understand our relation- McMunin suggested one possible explanation for the discom- ship with God through the lens of earthly parenting. fort evident in Lund's reaction to this teaching when he noted J Healthy parenting of mortal children is about many noble that worshippers want the object of their worship to "have the things, but it is not about mercy or condescension in anything whole world in his hand," because they "do not propose to like the sense described above. Like most parents, I have a take their problems to a God who has problems of his own."13 deep and abiding love for my son that can drive me to make Maybe Lund disliked the notion that God once was not a god great sacrifices for his sake. But I did not become and I do not because that idea threatened his comforting belief in a god remain Christian's father because I feel sony for him. I am with no limits. simply thrilled to be a part of his life, to have the opportunity King Follett theology poses another, less obvious but re- to share in his upbringing, and to help and watch him grow. lated threat to certain religious sensibilities. Traditional Like the heavenly father Joseph Smith describes, I am Christian theologies present God's participation in human af- raising my son to share in whatever "knowledge, power and fairs as the incomprehensible condescension of a being insu- glory" I have achieved or may achieve. Sadly, this means an im- perably superior to us. In such theologies, the creation and portant part of what I want for Christian is independence from subsequent Atonement of humanity is solely motivated by the me. Like any teacher's, my success is measured by the extent to unmerited mercy of the supreme being for lesser creatures which my child becomes able to meet tasks and challenges who are and must ever remain pitiable by comparison to their without my help.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INTERPRETER§ a Journal of Mormon Scripture
    INTERPRETER§ A Journal of Mormon Scripture Volume 21 • 2016 The Interpreter Foundation Orem, Utah The Interpreter Foundation Chairman and President Contributing Editors Daniel C. Peterson Robert S. Boylan John M. Butler Vice Presidents James E. Faulconer Jeffrey M. Bradshaw Kristine Wardle Frederickson Daniel Oswald Benjamin I. Huff Allen Wyatt Jennifer C. Lane David J. Larsen Executive Board Donald W. Parry Kevin Christensen Ugo A. Perego Steven T. Densley, Jr. Stephen D. Ricks Brant A. Gardner William J. Hamblin G. Bruce Schaalje Jeff Lindsay Andrew C. Smith Louis C. Midgley John A. Tvedtnes George L. Mitton Sidney B. Unrau Gregory L. Smith Stephen T. Whitlock Tanya Spackman Lynne Hilton Wilson Ted Vaggalis Mark Alan Wright Board of Editors Donor Relations Matthew L. Bowen Jann E. Campbell David M. Calabro Alison V. P. Coutts Treasurer Craig L. Foster Kent Flack Taylor Halverson Ralph C. Hancock Production Editor & Designers Cassandra S. Hedelius Kelsey Fairbanks Avery Benjamin L. McGuire Tyler R. Moulton Timothy Guymon Mike Parker Bryce M. Haymond Martin S. Tanner Bryan J. Thomas Gordon C. Thomasson A. Keith Thompson John S. Thompson Bruce F. Webster The Interpreter Foundation Editorial Consultants Media & Technology Talia A. K. Abbott Sean Canny † Linda Hunter Adams Scott Dunaway Merrie Kay Ames Richard Flygare Jill Bartholomew Brad Haymond Tyson Briggs Tyler R. Moulton Starla Butler Tom Pittman Joshua Chandler Russell D. Richins Kasen Christensen S. Hales Swift Ryan Daley Victor Worth Marcia Gibbs Jolie Griffin Laura Hales Hannah Morgan Jordan Nate Eric Naylor Don Norton Neal Rappleye Jared Riddick William Shryver Stephen Owen Smoot Kaitlin Cooper Swift Jennifer Tonks Austin Tracy Kyle Tuttle Scott Wilkins © 2016 The Interpreter Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret Mormon Meetings of 1922
    University of Nevada, Reno THE SECRET MORMON MEETINGS OF 1922 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History By Shannon Caldwell Montez C. Elizabeth Raymond, Ph.D. / Thesis Advisor December 2019 Copyright by Shannon Caldwell Montez 2019 All Rights Reserved UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by SHANNON CALDWELL MONTEZ entitled The Secret Mormon Meetings of 1922 be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS C. Elizabeth Raymond, Ph.D., Advisor Cameron B. Strang, Ph.D., Committee Member Greta E. de Jong, Ph.D., Committee Member Erin E. Stiles, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School December 2019 i Abstract B. H. Roberts presented information to the leadership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in January of 1922 that fundamentally challenged the entire premise of their religious beliefs. New research shows that in addition to church leadership, this information was also presented during the neXt few months to a select group of highly educated Mormon men and women outside of church hierarchy. This group represented many aspects of Mormon belief, different areas of eXpertise, and varying approaches to dealing with challenging information. Their stories create a beautiful tapestry of Mormon life in the transition years from polygamy, frontier life, and resistance to statehood, assimilation, and respectability. A study of the people involved illuminates an important, overlooked, underappreciated, and eXciting period of Mormon history.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith and the Plurality of Worlds Idea
    oseph Smith and the . Plurality of Worlds Idea Robert Paul JOSEPH SMITH WAS NOT THE FIRST PERSON to use the plurality of worlds concept. In the early seventeenth century, natural philosophers began speculating on the idea of multiple world systems. By the eighteenth century, Protestant evangelicals absorbed the idea into their Natural Theology. For them nature contained clear and compelling evidence of God's existence, sub- stantiating their own Christian beliefs and countering religious skepticism (Westfall 1958; Hovenkamp 1978). Joseph used the concept quite differently, though never defensively. Theologically he related man, God, and the uni- verse ; religiously, his message was millenarian and directed toward eschatologi- cal issues. On careful examination, these complex issues suggest that the en- vironmental thesis — the view that one's cultural matrix is entirely sufficient to account for the emergence of a coherent set of ideas or conventions — does not provide a wholly adequate explanation of the style and structure of restora- tionist pluralism. In addition to examining the astronomical pluralism in Joseph's writings, this essay will assess the merits of the environmental thesis without suggesting that Joseph Smith as a religious leader must always be seen either as a prophet or as a charlatan, a dichotomy which has prevented useful and productive understanding of an enigmatic character. For purposes of this study, it is per- fectly consistent with Joseph's own experiences and writings to see him as an emerging prophet, as one who was as much a part of the process of religious ROBERT PAUL is an associate professor of the history of science and of computer science at Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • 28-32 a Scherer Nauvoo from Coc Perspective.Qxd 6/21/02 7:37 AM Page 28
    28-32_a_scherer_nauvoo from coc perspective.qxd 6/21/02 7:37 AM Page 28 SUNSTONE What does Nauvoo mean today to members of the Community of Christ (formerly RLDS Church)? How have their views changed through the generations? Does the way our two traditions differ in their views of Nauvoo reflect different spiritual understandings as well? ANSWERING QUESTIONS NO LONGER ASKED NAUVOO, ITS MEANING AND INTERPRETATION IN THE RLDS CHURCH/COMMUNITY OF CHRIST By Mark A. Scherer COLLEAGUE OF MINE RECENTLY OBSERVED, Today’s Community of Christ does not take “official posi- “Only one church name is more difficult to say than tions” in matters of church history. Although this has not al- A ‘The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,’ and ways been the case, members (and their historians) are free that is ‘The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day from the strictures that confuse matters of faith with sound Saints.’”1 The similarity of the two names accurately suggests a historical methodology. Simply stated: “Our history is not our common historical origin, a similar priesthood, scriptural, and theology.” Thus, a member of the Community of Christ can administrative structure. And the Nauvoo, Illinois, experience is ask tough historical questions without fear of being considered pivotal to both movements. For the church headquartered in “weak in the faith.” Today, we believe our history informs us Salt Lake City, Utah, Nauvoo represents the crowning achieve- about our institutional and individual identity—where we ment of Latter Day Saintism; for the church headquartered in have been in the past, where we are at present, and where we Independence, Missouri, Nauvoo represents the movement’s are going in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Elohim and Jehovah in Mormonism and the Bible
    Elohim and Jehovah in Mormonism and the Bible Boyd Kirkland urrently, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints defines the CGodhead as consisting of three separate and distinct personages or Gods: Elohim, or God the Father; Jehovah, or Jesus Christ, the Son of God both in the spirit and in the flesh; and the Holy Ghost. The Father and the Son have physical, resurrected bodies of flesh and bone, but the Holy Ghost is a spirit personage. Jesus' title of Jehovah reflects his pre-existent role as God of the Old Testament. These definitions took official form in "The Father and the Son: A Doctrinal Exposition by the First Presidency and the Twelve" (1916) as the culmination of five major stages of theological development in Church history (Kirkland 1984): 1. Joseph Smith, Mormonism's founder, originally spoke and wrote about God in terms practically indistinguishable from then-current protestant the- ology. He used the roles, personalities, and titles of the Father and the Son interchangeably in a manner implying that he believed in only one God who manifested himself as three persons. The Book of Mormon, revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants prior to 1835, and Smith's 1832 account of his First Vision all reflect "trinitarian" perceptions. He did not use the title Elohim at all in this early stage and used Jehovah only rarely as the name of the "one" God. 2. The 1835 Lectures on Faith and Smith's official 1838 account of his First Vision both emphasized the complete separateness of the Father and the Son.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from David Whitmer to Nathan West Concerning Caldwell County, Missouri, Property Once Owned by King Follett
    Scott H. Faulring: David Whitmer Letter 127 Letter from David Whitmer to Nathan West Concerning Caldwell County, Missouri, Property Once Owned by King Follett Scott H. Faulring Filed away in the David Whitmer Collection at the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (RLDS) Archives is an inconspicuous, handwritten copy of a November 1849 letter from David Whitmer to Nathan A. West.1 In this carefully worded letter, Whitmer responded to West’s inquiry about a legal title to land once owned by the late Mormon elder King Follett.2 One senses from reading the letter that although David was trying to be helpful to his friend, he wanted to distance himself legally from liability in a decade-old property question. This letter is historically significant and interesting for a variety of rea- sons. First, there are few surviving letters from David Whitmer written dur- ing the first ten to fifteen years after he separated himself from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.3 Second, this retained copy, and most probably the dispatched original, was handwritten by Oliver Cowdery—just a little more than three months before he died. As such, it is the last-known handwriting of Mormonism’s Second Elder.4 Third, the letter’s cautious, legalistic wording is not from the mind of David Whitmer but was composed by Oliver Cowdery, the lawyer. As such, it is the only example of his legal writing from his fourteen-month stay in Richmond.5 Fourth, the items dis- cussed in the letter evidence the confused state of affairs existing in Far West, Missouri, at the time the Latter-day Saints were forced to flee the state in 1839.6 SCOTT H.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 1 1994 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (1994) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol20/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994 Table of Contents LETTERS vi ARTICLES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS • --Positivism or Subjectivism? Some Reflections on a Mormon Historical Dilemma Marvin S. Hill, 1 TANNER LECTURE • --Mormon and Methodist: Popular Religion in the Crucible of the Free Market Nathan O. Hatch, 24 • --The Windows of Heaven Revisited: The 1899 Tithing Reformation E. Jay Bell, 45 • --Plurality, Patriarchy, and the Priestess: Zina D. H. Young's Nauvoo Marriages Martha Sonntag Bradley and Mary Brown Firmage Woodward, 84 • --Lords of Creation: Polygamy, the Abrahamic Household, and Mormon Patriarchy B. Cannon Hardy, 119 REVIEWS 153 --The Story of the Latter-day Saints by James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard Richard E. Bennett --Hero or Traitor: A Biographical Story of Charles Wesley Wandell by Marjorie Newton Richard L. Saunders --Mormon Redress Petition: Documents of the 1833-1838 Missouri Conflict edited by Clark V. Johnson Stephen C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Odyssey of Thomas Stuart Ferguson
    The Odyssey of Thomas Stuart Ferguson Stan Larson WITH A KEEN EYE TO THE LDS BOOK MARKET during the 1987 and 1988 Christmas and conference seasons, various Utah radio stations aired this dramatic radio commercial: In 1949 [1946] California lawyer, Tom Ferguson, rolled up his sleeves, threw a shovel over his shoulder, and marched into the remote jungles of southern Mexico. Armed with a quote by Joseph Smith that the Lord had "a hand in proving the Book of Mormon true in the eyes of all the people," Ferguson's goal was: Shut the mouths of the critics who said such evidence did not exist. Ferguson began an odyssey that included twenty-four trips to Central America, eventually resulting in a mountain of evidence supporting Book of Mormon claims. (Johnson 1988; cf. Warren and Ferguson 1987, vi) The book advertised was The Messiah in Ancient America, and the authors were listed as Bruce W. Warren and Thomas Stuart Ferguson. The main point of the commercial, taking into consideration the hyper- bole of paid advertising, was that Ferguson had amassed evidence so overwhelming that any fair-minded person would have no alternative but to accept the historical claims of the Book of Mormon. STAN LARSON is religion archives specialist, Special Collections, Marriott Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. 56 DIALOGUE: A JOURNAL OF MORMON THOUGHT Although Warren's preface to the book refers to the late Tom Ferguson's "abiding testimony of the Book of Mormon" (Warren and Ferguson 1987, xiii), a completely different image of Ferguson has been presented recently by Jerald and Sandra Tanner, anti-Mormon publish- ers in Salt Lake City.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Mormon War Timeline of Events
    Missouri Mormon War Timeline of Events Sunday, June 17, 1838 threaten him on August 8, 1838, if he did not sign a pe- Sidney Rigdon’s Salt Speech tition not to molest the people called Mormons.. War- Sidney Rigdon used Matthew 5:13 as the theme for rants of arrest are issued for Joseph Smith and Lyman his discourse: “Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt Wight. have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is Thursday, August 30, 1838 thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to B. M. Lisle, Adjutant General Jefferson City, be trodden under foot of men.” Rigdon used the spir- letter to Major General David R. Atchison itual metaphor to encourage the Saints to cast out the 3d Div. Missouri Militia, Richmond, MO dissenters from the Latter-day Saint communities. Adjutant General B. M. Lisle dispatches orders from the Commander-in-Chief, Governor Lilburn W. Boggs Wednesday, July 4, 1838 to Major General Atchison to raise immediately, in his Sidney Rigdon’s 4th of July Speech division, four hundred men, mounted and equipped. Speaking of the Constitution of the United States, This is to be done because of the indications of Indi- Rigdon proclaimed the Church’s rights and freedom an disturbances on “our immediate frontier” and re- from its enemies. The sentiment expressed in the ser- cent civil disturbances of Caldwell, Daviess and Car- mon was indicative of a new attitude some of the mem- roll Counties. Note: Similar letters to Generals John B. bers of the Church were taking toward their enemies Clark, Samuel D.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Harper.Indd
    2 “That They Might Come to Understanding”: Revelation as Process Steven C. Harper n a spring Sabbath in 1843, a gathering of Latter-day Saints opened Otheir worship service with a hymn. Wilford Woodruff prayed, and “then Joseph the Seer arose & said It is not wisdom that we should have all knowledge at once presented before us but that we should have a little[. T]hen we can comprehend it.”1 Joseph had learned early in his prophetic ministry about the power of transcendent revelatory events, like his First Vision or his visits from Moroni. But he also learned that such events were part of the process by which revelation distilled over time. Like compound interest on investments, light and knowledge accumulate as revelatory events combine with insight from experience and thought. In November 1831, as Joseph was preparing to publish his revelation texts, he sought and received a preface for them. In a revelatory event, he dictated the text that is now Doctrine and Covenants section 1. It sets forth the Lord’s reason for revealing himself in process to Joseph as he did. “These commandments are of me,” the Lord said, speaking of the revelation texts, “and were given unto my servants in their weakness, after the manner of their Steven C. Harper is a professor of Church history and doctrine at Brigham Young University. 19 20 Steven C. Harper language, that they might come to understanding” (D&C 1:24; emphasis added). This passage is key in appreciating revelation as a process of communication between a divine being and mortal ones, a process that is not complete once the revelation text has been written or published or read, but rather once it has been internalized and acted upon.
    [Show full text]
  • 91 Salt Lake City Messenger: Quest for the Gold Plates
    Salt Lake City Messenger Utah Lighthouse Ministry 1358 S. West Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 Issue No. 91 Edited by Jerald and Sandra Tanner November 1996 QUEST FOR THE GOLD PLATES STAN LARSON’S NEW BOOK Stan Larson, who was a scriptural exegete for Translation First of all, the Tanners reproduced Ferguson’s Services of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the study of problems in Book of Mormon geography Mormons), has recently published a book entitled, Quest for the and archaeology that he had prepared for a written Gold Plates: Thomas Stuart Ferguson’s Archaeological Search symposium on the subject. The Tanners entitled this for the Book of Mormon. 1988 publication Ferguson’s Manuscript Unveiled. In this book Dr. Larson dealt with the vexing question of At the same time the Tanners published an article . whether Thomas Stuart Ferguson, who organized the New World in the September 1988 issue of their Salt Lake City Archaeological Foundation and devoted himself to proving the Messenger. the principal interest of the Tanners is in authenticity of the Book of Mormon, had eventually lost faith in documenting his purported disillusionment and loss of that book and in Joseph Smith, the Mormon prophet. As many faith by recounting his visit to their home in December of our readers may know, Ferguson wrote the well-known book, 1970 and by quoting from seven letters which Ferguson One Fold and One Shepherd. allegedly wrote from 1968 to 1979. Like Stan Larson, we were very surprised when we FERGUSON AND ARCHEOLOGY learned that Thomas Stuart Ferguson had doubts about In the introduction to his book, pages XIII-XIV, Larson Mormonism.
    [Show full text]
  • The King Follett Discourse
    The King Follett Discourse The Being and Kind of Being God Is; The Immortality of the Intelligence of Man Joseph Smith April 7, 1844 History of the Church, 6:302-317 President Joseph Smith delivered the following discourse before about twenty thousand Saints at the April General Conference of the Church, 1844, being the funeral sermon of Elder King Follett. Reported by Willard Richards, Wilford Woodruff, Thomas Bullock and William Clayton. Beloved Saints, I will call the attention of this congregation while I address you on the subject of the dead. The decease of our beloved brother, Elder King Follett, who was crushed in a well by the falling of a tub of rock, has more immediately led me to that subject. I have been requested to speak by his friends and relatives, but inasmuch as there are a great many in this congregation who live in this city as well as elsewhere, who have lost friends, I feel disposed to speak on the subject in general, and offer you my ideas, so far as I have ability, and so far as I shall be inspired by the Holy Spirit to dwell on this subject. I want your prayers and faith that I may have the instruction of Almighty God and the gift of the Holy Ghost, so that I may set forth things that are true and which can be easily comprehended by you, and that the testimony may carry conviction to your hearts and minds of the truth of what I shall say. Pray that the Lord may strengthen my lungs, stay the winds, and let the prayers of the Saints to heaven appear, that they may enter into the ears of the Lord of Sabbaoth, for the effectual prayers of the righteous avail much.
    [Show full text]