DOCSLIB.ORG

Examination of Leeds Site Allocation Plan (“Sap”)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Examination of Leeds Site Allocation Plan (“Sap”) EXAMINATION OF LEEDS SITE ALLOCATION PLAN (“SAP”) STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF MR C MAKIN ___________________________________________________________________ MATTER 1 –PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS WHETHER THE LEEDS SAP MEETS THE LEGAL PROCESS AND REQUIREMENTS ________________________________________________ Amanda Beresford Shulmans LLP 10 Wellington Place Leeds LS1 4AP Tel: 0113 288 2816 Fax: 0113 246 7326 This statement is made on behalf of Mr Chris Makin to the examination of the Leeds Site Allocation Plan. It responds to Matter 1 Procedural Requirements - whether the Leeds SAP meets the legal process and requirements. It should be read in conjunction with the representatives made by Pegasus Group on behalf of Mr C Makin to the Leeds Site Allocation Plan Submission Draft Pre- submission Changes dated March 2017. These consisted of three documents listed below and include all of the representations made on behalf of Mr Makin during the various consultation stages as follows: (i) Submission Draft Pre-Submission Changes Area Proposals: 8. Outer South for Mr Makin (document ref. YOR.1969.007) inc. Appendices, dated March 2017, (ii) Submission Draft Pre-Submission Changes Area Proposals: 10. Outer South East for Mr Makin (document ref. YOR.1654.18) inc. Appendices, dated March 2017. (iii) Submission Draft Pre-Submission Changes Area Proposals: 6. Outer North East Representation for Mr Makin (document ref. YOR.1654.19A) inc. Appendices, dated March 2017. Q1. Has the Council submitted robust evidence to demonstrate that it has met the duty to co- operate? Are there any outstanding strategic matters? 1.1 S33 (A) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 requires, inter alia, that a local planning authority must co-operate with specified persons in maximising the effectiveness of the preparation of development plan documents so far as relating to a strategic matter. Strategic matter is defined by S33A, ss4 (a) to include the sustainable development or use of land that has or would have a significant impact on at least two planning areas. 1.2 The duty to co-operate must be discharged prior to the submission of the plan for examination. 1.3 The Council’s evidence to the Examination on the duty to co-operate comprises the Duty to Co-operate Background Paper May 2017 (ref CD1/28). This includes an addendum dated September 2016 (“the Addendum”). 1.4 The Addendum was prepared in conjunction with the re-consultation of the Outer North East, Housing Market Area, (“ONE HMCA”) as a result of the withdrawal of the Headley Hall new settlement proposal and the introduction of the proposed new settlement at Parlington (MX2-39). 1.5 The Addendum refers to a proposed meeting with Selby District Council and North Yorkshire County Council to consider the new proposal for ONE which did not take place but which was replaced by a “number of co-ordinated phone calls and exchange of email 2 comments (point 4 of the Addendum)”. The impression therefore is that this co-operation was between Selby District Council and North Yorkshire County Council. Although the Addendum acknowledges that the issues were of relevance to Harrogate Council there is no clear reference to co-operation with Harrogate at this stage. 1.6 In the Council’s replies to the initial questions (penultimate paragraph on page 27) the Council state that discussions with City of York Council on HE2 – 226 are outstanding. 1.7 Therefore there appears to be no submitted robust evidence that at the time of submission of the plan to the examination, co-operation had taken place with either Harrogate Council or the City of York Council on the new ONE HMCA proposals despite its strategic implications. 1.8 Further, it is clear from the Addendum and the replies to the Inspector’s initial question of the Council that co-operation on the ONE HMCA had not been carried out by the time of submission in relation to significant strategic issues including the highway/traffic implications of the allocations in the ONE HMCA and the heritage implications of allocating the site at Parlington (MX2-39). 1.9 In the absence of proper co-operation in relation to these matters prior to submission the Council were not in a position to justify the allocations in the ONE HMCA particularly MX2- 39. It is not legitimate to try and justify the position retrospectively. Co-operation should inform the decision making process and cannot operate retrospectively. The Addendum demonstrates that any co-operation in relation to the revised proposals for ONE HMCA was after the Council had resolved to allocate the MX2-39. There can therefore have been no co-operation in relation to the decision to allocate MX2-39. In the Addendum traffic impact was considered to need mitigation and it is clear that further co-operation with Highways England was required in order to address this. No such co-operation therefore informed the decision to allocate MX2-39. Although the Addendum referred to duty to co-operate bodies having been notified of the revised proposals of ONE HMCA. It also confirms that no responses had been received at the date of publication of the background document. Therefore, on the submitted evidence none of these organisations had informed the decision to allocate MX2-39. 1.10 Therefore the Council’s evidence does not robustly demonstrate that it has met its duty to co-operate in preparing the SAP for examination. 1.11 1.5 to 1.10 above are indicative of the reactive and rushed nature of the decision to allocate MX2-39. 3 Q2. Has the Plan been prepared in accordance with the Local Development Scheme? 2.1 No Comment. Q3. Has the plan been prepared in compliance with the Statement of Community Involvement? 3.1 The consultation on the new proposals for ONE HMCA are inconsistent with the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement and Regulations 18, 19 and 20 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) Regulations 2012 for the following reason. 3.2 On its website publicising the revised public draft consultation, the Council’s Regulation 19 statement and the response form; the LPA stress that: “Only comments relating to the Outer North East HMCA will be considered as part of this consultation”. 3.3 This statement therefore discourages representations relating to the wider issues which the allocation of MX2-39 creates, such as whether or not it is the right location to delete land from the Green Belt or whether there could be an alternative elsewhere in the Plan area and the impact on the wider infrastructure beyond the ONE HMCA area. Q4. Has the plan operation been based on a sound process of sustainability appraisal? 4.1 A sustainability appraisal incorporating the requirements of the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive is required to comply with this directive, as transposed into English law by the Environment Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004, the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 Section 19(5) and in accordance with the National Planning Policy set out in NPPF, paragraph 165. 4.2 The Council’s sustainability appraisal is defective in the following respects: 4.2.1 It fails to include in the assessment sites proposed to be included in the SAP under Policy HG1 which comprise unimplemented sites formally allocated in the Leeds UDP or sites with existing or recently expired planning permissions. All sites proposed for allocation in the SAP should have been subjected to the same degree of assessment. 4 4.2.2 The sustainability appraisal tests sites against 26 specified sustainability criterion. In a number of cases the application of this test was flawed. Some examples of this are as follows: (a) A choice was made between Stourton Grange Farm South (allocated site HG2-124) and Sturton Grange Farm North (site reference 1232A) (“SGFN”). SGFN was not allocated but this was not justified by the assessment. For 22 of the 26 sustainability criterion the two sites rated the same. In respect of the remaining four criterions, the unallocated SGFN is rated better in 1 (access to education (SA03)) with incorrect allocations in the other three. In SA08 (increase in social inclusion and acted community participation) SGFN is given a neutral rating when in fact it is clear that, like HG2-124 should have been given a blue rating identifying it as a large site with scope to accommodate new facilities. In relation to SA18B (reduce pollution levels) is given a lower rating than HG2-124 for the stated reason that it is located near to the motorway. However, SGFN is in excess of 50 metres from the motorway and its enhanced accessibility to the motorway junction and proximity to public transport routes are factors which should be balanced against this point in favour of SGFN. At SA21 (preserve and enhance the historic environment), SGFN is identified with a lesser rating than HG2-124 on the basis of being within 100 metres of heritage assets and where affects are uncertain. However, the only designated heritage assets within the vicinity of the SGFN are milestone on public roads, the special character and setting of both of which can be readily preserved as part of the design scheme. If the sustainability appraisal had been properly applied, SGFN would have been favoured. (For further details see Pegasus’ representation for the Leeds Site Allocation Plan Submission Draft Pre- submission changes Area Proposal 10 Outer South East, Appendix B pages 16 to 18 inclusive). (b) The sustainability appraisal fails to provide any clear conclusion that the proposed allocation of MX2-39, when judged against reasonable alternatives, of which SGFN is one, will help to achieve the relevant environmental, economic and social objectives as planned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Boundary Committee for England Periodic Electoral Review of Leeds
    K ROAD BARWIC School School Def School STANKS R I School N G R O A D PARLINGTON CP C R O PARKLANDS S S G A T E S HAREWOOD WARD KILLINGBECK AND School PENDA'S FIELDS SEACROFT WARD MANSTON CROSS GATES AND WHINMOOR WARD D A O BARWICK IN ELMET AND R Def D R O SCHOLES CP F R E Def B A CROSS GATES ROAD U n S T d A T I O Barnbow Common N R School O A D Seacroft Hospital Def A 6 5 6 2 4 6 A f De R IN G R O A D H A Def L A T U O S N T H O R P E GRAVELEYTHORPE L A N E U f nd e D N EW HO LD NE LA IRK ITK Elmfield WH nd Business U Park Newhold Industrial Estate E Recreation AN AUSTHORPE Y L Ground WB RO BAR School f e School STURTON GRANGE CP D A 6 5 WHITKIRK LANE END AUSTHORPE WEST 6 PARISH WARD AUSTHORPE CP MOOR GARFORTH School EAST GARFORTH The Oval f AUSTHORPE EAST e D PARISH WARD SE School LB Y RO AD f e D Recreation Football Ground Ground Cricket Ground f e D Swillington Common COLTON School CHURCH GARFORTH School Cricket Ground Allotment Gardens LIDGETT f e D School GARFORTH TEMPLE NEWSAM WARD Schools Swillington Common U D A n College O d R m a s a N n w A e e r M n A O le s B t p r R U m o P e p L T S L E C R T H OR D P L E L E A WEST I N E GARFORTH F E L K C I M SE LB Y R O D AD e f A 63 Hollinthorpe Hollinthorpe 6 5 D 6 e A A 63 f A LE ED S School RO A D D i s m a n t le d R a il w a y K ip p a x B e c k Def SWILLINGTON CP Kippax Common Recreation Ground Ledston Newsam GARFORTH AND SWILLINGTON WARD Luck Green Swillington School School Kippax School Allotment Gardens School D A O R E G D I R Allotment Sports Ground Gardens Sports Grounds
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Parish Council for Rawdon
    Community Governance Review Establishment of a Parish Council for Rawdon Information pack for Electoral Working Group Tuesday 21 August 2012 Electoral Services Level 2 Town Hall The Headrow Leeds LS1 3AD 0113 3952858 [email protected] www.leeds.gov.uk/elections 1 Contents Item Page Number • Map of the proposed Rawdon Parish Council area 3 • Details of current arrangements relating to community 4 - 5 engagement or representation • Details of developments 6 • Demographic information 7 • Electorate 8 • Potential effects of Boundary Commission’s review 9 • Precept 10 - 13 • Transfer of land and property 14 • Summary of representations 15 • Details of representations 16 - 32 • Electoral arrangements o Proposal from Cllr Collins 33 o Officer recommendations 33 – 35 • Appendix A - Directory of Parish/Town Clerks 2012 36 – 41 • Appendix B - Revised Rawdon Parish Council Boundary Map 42 • Appendix C - Map showing split of Polling District GRG 43 2 Map of the proposed Rawdon Parish Council area 3 Current arrangements relating to community engagement / representation Organisation Purpose Rawdon Billing Action Group Joan Roberts - Treasurer 27 Billing View LS19 6PR 0113 2509843 [email protected] Opposing development and protecting greenbelt status on Rawdon Billing and Diana Al- Saadi - Secretary associated land. 15 Billing View LS19 6PR` 0113 2100154 [email protected] Janet Bennett—Chairman Area Committees aim to improve the delivery and co-ordination of local council services and improve the quality of local decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Mines and Minerals Rights Relating to HG2-124 and BL1-40
    Leeds Revised Submission Site Allocation Plan (SAP) Matter 7, Agenda Item 4 – Mines and Minerals Rights relating to HG2-124 and BL1-40 Position Statement between: (1) BDW Homes and Taylor Wimpey ("BDW/TW") (2) Mr Christopher Makin (3) Leeds City Council ("LCC") Introduction 1 At the close of the Examination in Public Hearing (EiP) held on 2 August 2018, the Inspectors' requested the relevant parties (as noted above) to provide a Position Statement, setting out any areas of agreement and disagreement regarding the issue of mines and minerals rights relating to HG2-124 and/or BL1-40 (together the "Site"). 2 This Position Statement has been prepared and submitted in response to the Inspectors' request. It sets out the factual and legal background to the land ownership of the relevant sites (so far as it is relevant to the issue of mines and minerals) and addresses Mr Makin's stated ownership of the mines and minerals. 3 Copies of the relevant title registers and plans as well as the Conveyance dated 30 August 1938 made between (1) Alvary Douglas Frederick Gascoigne and (2) Walter Dawson (the "1938 Conveyance") were provided to the Inspectors at the close of the EiP. Land Ownership of HG2-124 and BL1-40 – Agreed Facts 4 Under Title number WYK586916, Mrs Jean Makin, is registered with an absolute freehold title to the land known as land on the north side of Selby Road, Micklefield (the "Property") and which comprises part of HG2-124 and all of BL1-40. Entry Number 2 of the Property Register confirms that there is an express exception of mines and minerals together with the ancillary powers of working.
    [Show full text]
  • Garforth and Church Fenton
    High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | LA16 LA16: Garforth and Church Fenton High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H27 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report LA16: Garforth and Church Fenton H27 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Save Parlington Actiongroup
    SAVE PARLINGTON ACTION GROUP RESPONSE TO INSPECTORS MATTERS, ISSUES AND QUESTIONS LEEDS SITE ALLOCATIONS PLAN EXAMINATION MATTER 5 1. MATTER 5 - INFRASTRUCTURE Issue – Whether the necessary infrastructure will be in place to support the planned development. Question 1. Is the process of identifying the infrastructure requirements arising from the proposed allocations set out in the SAP, as identified in the Infrastructure Background Paper (CD1/35) sound? 1.1 SPAG has analysed the Infrastructure Background Paper (CD1/35) with regards to the site MX2-39. We acknowledge that the paper covers issues with a broad brush approach for Leeds City Council (“LCC”) generally, but when assessed for MX2-39 it is apparent that large parts of the CD1/35 are unsound. Below are relevant points from the CD1/35 document with comments. Our conclusion is that the proposed infrastructure for MX2-39 is UNSOUND. CD1-35 heading Comments 1.2 Purpose of the Page 7 The paper commits to working with communities and through Infrastructure point neighbourhood planning. SPAG contends that LCC has not Delivery Plan 1.3 worked with its communities and can provide evidence of this regarding MX2-39 1.3 Developing the SAP Page 8, The paper states that LCC has consulted with organisations such Infrastructure point as Highways England. In March 2017 SPAG met with HE, who requirements 1.5 had no knowledge of the extent of MX2-39. SPAG can provide evidence that this statement is false, and therefore UNSOUND. To date, there is no report from Highways England with regards to MX2-39. 1.4 Developing the IDP Page 8 This was undertaken in April 2013, and LCC’s methodology was point applied to the sites proposed at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2.4. Yorkshire Parliamentary Enclosure Awards
    Changes in the status and distribution of mammals of the order Carnivora in Yorkshire from 1600. County history of the fox, badger, otter, pine marten, stoat, weasel, polecat, American mink, wildcat and domestic cat. Item Type Thesis Authors Howes, Colin Anthony Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 25/09/2021 18:49:21 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/4306 APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS. APPENDIX 2.4. YORKSHIRE PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE AWARDS (From English (1985) and Local Records Offices) (In alphabetical order of parish). Key: NR = North Riding, ER = East Riding, WR = West Riding, N = Nottinghamshire NY = North Yorkshire, SY = South Yorkshire, WY = West Yorkshire, H = Humberside, Cl = Cleveland, Cu = Cumbria , D = Durham, La = Lancashire, Li = Lincolnshire, Gm = Greater Manchester, Post Parish/Township Riding 1974 Act Award Acres County Abbotside, High NR NY 1814 1851 128 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1824 1837 938 Abbotside, High & Low NR NY 1880 1881 9701 Acklam ER NY 1769 1776 796 Acklam ER NY 1825 1854 310 Ackton WR WY 1812 1816 60 Ackworth WR WY 1772 1774 652 Acomb & Holgate WR NY 1774 1776 1581 Adingham WR WY 1865 1873 735 Adlingfleet WR H 1843 1847 1051
    [Show full text]
  • BARWICK in ELMET & SCHOLES PARISH COUNCIL Response To
    BARWICK in ELMET & SCHOLES PARISH COUNCIL Response to Leeds City Council’s position statement of 8th September 2017 Clerk to the Parish Council : Mr. K Langley 33 Flats Lane, Barwick in Elmet, Leeds LS15 4LJ phone 0113 393 5861 : email – [email protected] Below are the comments of Barwick In Elmet and Scholes Parish Council (“BIESPC”) on the answers provided by Leeds City Council (“LCC”) – LCC’s position statement on the SAP Examination and Selective Core Strategy Review, dated 8th September 2017 This document follows the structure of LCC’s position statement, and comments under the headings in the statement. LCC’s replies are in black ink. BIESPC’s comments are in blue ink Question a What is the effect of the selective review of the CS on the soundness of the SAP? a.1 The effect of the Core Strategy Review (CSR) on the soundness of the SAP is considered to be minor and broadly contextual, not least because the scope of both Development Plan Documents (DPD) is substantially different; 1. LCC’s reply to this question seems merely rhetorical and lacking in detail and substantiating evidence. This answer is inconsistent with LCC’s adopted Core Strategy. Core Strategy 1.4 states “The CS is the main document setting out the overall vision and strategic level policies… All other LDF documents will be guided by its policies including the Site Allocations Plan …”. Therefore the scope of the documents cannot be ‘substantially different’ and LCC is ignoring its own policies to suit its own ends; 2. To help overcome this weakness in LCC’s response, we would request that the Inspector also asks the following question: “What is the effect of the selective review of the CS, in comparison with the effect of a comprehensive review, on the soundness of the SAP?”; 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions for the North East of England
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 6306 PUBLICATION DATE: 29/08/2018 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 19/09/2018 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 5th September 2018 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners Copies of Applications and Decisions can be
    [Show full text]
  • WEST YORKSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society a Photograph Exists for Milestones Listed Below but Would Benefit from Updating!
    WEST YORKSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society A photograph exists for milestones listed below but would benefit from updating! National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position YW_ADBL01 SE 0600 4933 A6034 ADDINGHAM Silsden Rd, S of Addingham above EP149, just below small single storey barn at bus stop nr entrance to Cringles Park Home YW_ADBL02 SE 0494 4830 A6034 SILSDEN Bolton Rd; N of Silsden Estate YW_ADBL03 SE 0455 4680 A6034 SILSDEN Bolton Rd; Silsden just below 7% steep hill sign YW_ADBL04 SE 0388 4538 A6034 SILSDEN Keighley Rd; S of Silsden on pavement, 100m south of town sign YW_BAIK03 SE 0811 5010 B6160 ADDINGHAM Addingham opp. Bark La in narrow verge, under hedge on brow of hill in wall by Princefield Nurseries opp St Michaels YW_BFHA04 SE 1310 2905 A6036 SHELF Carr House Rd;Buttershaw Church YW_BFHA05 SE 1195 2795 A6036 BRIGHOUSE Halifax Rd, just north of jct with A644 at Stone Chair on pavement at little layby, just before 30 sign YW_BFHA06 SE 1145 2650 A6036 NORTHOWRAM Bradford Rd, Northowram in very high stone wall behind LP39 YW_BFHG01 SE 1708 3434 A658 BRADFORD Otley Rd; nr Peel Park, opp. Cliffe Rd nr bus stop, on bend in Rd YW_BFHG02 SE 1815 3519 A658 BRADFORD Harrogate Rd, nr Silwood Drive on verge opp parade of shops Harrogate Rd; north of Park Rd, nr wall round playing YW_BFHG03 SE 1889 3650 A658 BRADFORD field near bus stop & pedestrian controlled crossing YW_BFHG06 SE 212 403 B6152 RAWDON Harrogate Rd, Rawdon about 200m NE of Stone Trough Inn Victoria Avenue; TI north of tunnel
    [Show full text]
  • Domesday Book
    Book ❧ Places ❧ Names ❧ API OPEN DOMESDAY The first free online copy of Domesday Book NAME: ILBERT OF LACY This name is associated with 0 places before the Conquest; 249 after the Conquest. (Note that the same name may not be the same person.) AFTER THE CONQUEST Lord in 1086: Dalton, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Farnley [Tyas], Agbrigg, Yorkshire Flockton, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Honley, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Lepton, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Meltham, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Methley, Agbrigg, Yorkshire © MapTiler© OpenStreetMap contributors Quarmby, Agbrigg, Yorkshire [South] Crosland, Agbrigg, Yorkshire [Upper] Denby, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Warmfield, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Whitwood, Agbrigg, Yorkshire Coates, Aslacoe, Lincolnshire [East and `West'] Firsby, Aslacoe, Lincolnshire Ingham, Aslacoe, Lincolnshire Normanby [-by-Spital], Aslacoe, Lincolnshire Owmby [-by-Spital], Aslacoe, Lincolnshire Bampton, Bampton, Oxfordshire Stockley, Bampton, Oxfordshire Barkston, Barkston, Yorkshire Brayton, Barkston, Yorkshire Burton [Hall], Barkston, Yorkshire Grimston [Grange], Barkston, Yorkshire Hunchilhuse, Barkston, Yorkshire Kirkby [Wharfe], Barkston, Yorkshire Neuhuse, Barkston, Yorkshire Saxton, Barkston, Yorkshire Thorpe [Willoughby], Barkston, Yorkshire Cropwell [Butler], Bingham, Nottinghamshire Hickling, Bingham, Nottinghamshire Itterby, Bradley, Lincolnshire [Old] Clee, Bradley, Lincolnshire Cuddington, Copthorne, Surrey Cleatham, Corringham, Lincolnshire Northorpe, Corringham, Lincolnshire Burreth, Gartree, Lincolnshire [Great] Sturton, Gartree, Lincolnshire Ranby, Gartree,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Document Pack
    Public Document Pack SOUTH (INNER) AREA COMMITTEE Meeting to be held in Tenants Hall, Acre Close, Middleton, LS10 4HX on Wednesday, 9th January, 2013 at 6.30 pm MEMBERSHIP Councillors D Congreve - Beeston and Holbeck; A Gabriel (Chair) - Beeston and Holbeck; A Ogilvie - Beeston and Holbeck; P Davey - City and Hunslet; M Iqbal - City and Hunslet; E Nash - City and Hunslet; J Blake - Middleton Park; K Groves - Middleton Park; P Truswell - Middleton Park; Agenda compiled by: South East Area Leader: Phil Garnett Shaid Mahmood Governance Services Unit Tel: 22 43973 Civic Hall LEEDS LS1 1UR Tel: 39 51632 Produced on Recycled Paper A A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF COUNCIL FUNCTIONS AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS There are certain functions that are defined by regulations which can only be carried out at a meeting of the Full Council or under a Scheme of Delegation approved by the Full Council. Everything else is an Executive Function and, therefore, is carried out by the Council’s Executive Board or under a Scheme of Delegation agreed by the Executive Board. The Area Committee has some functions which are delegated from full Council and some Functions which are delegated from the Executive Board. Both functions are kept separately in order to make it clear where the authority has come from so that if there are decisions that the Area Committee decides not to make they know which body the decision should be referred back to. B A G E N D A Item Ward Item Not Page No Open No 1 APPEALS AGAINST REFU SAL OF INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS To consider any appeals in accordance with Procedure Rule 25 of the Access to Information Procedure Rules (in the event of an Appeal the press and public will be excluded).
    [Show full text]
  • Rawdon EWG Pack
    Community Governance Review Increase in the number of Parish Councillors for Scarcroft Parish Council Information pack for Electoral Working Group Tuesday 21 August 2012 Electoral Services Level 2 Town Hall The Headrow Leeds LS1 3AD 0113 3952858 [email protected] www.leeds.gov.uk/elections 1 Contents Item Page Number • Map of Scarcroft Parish Council 3 • Details of current arrangements relating to community 4 - 5 engagement or representation • Details of developments 6 • Demographic information 7 • Electorate 8 • Potential effects of Boundary Commission’s review 9 • Precept 10 • Transfer of land and property 11 • Summary of representations 12 • Details of representations 13 - 14 • Electoral arrangements 15 • Appendix A - Directory of Parish/Town Clerks 2012 16 - 21 2 Map of Scarcroft Parish Council 3 Current arrangements relating to community engagement / representation Organisation Purpose Area Committees aim to improve the delivery and co-ordination of local council services and improve the quality of local decision making. Area Committees have a lot of influence. They make sure local concerns are taken into account in the development of major policies and strategies. Area Committees also make sure priorities are addressed through local partnership working arrangements, with senior officer groups from Leeds City Council collaborating with organisations such as the Primary Care Trust and the Police which sit under the umbrella organisation, the Leeds Initiative: http://www.leedsinitiative.org/ The council has given specific North
    [Show full text]