DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 346 LOCAL GOVERNi-D-JNT BOUNDARY COAIWISSIOK FOR ESGLAHD REPORT NO. LOCAL OOVKRKMEIJT ^OUriDAIJY COMMISSION FOii ENGLAND CHAIRMAH Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J H Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Boxvden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr T) P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF LEEDS IN THE COUNTY OF WEST YORKSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan district of the City of Leeds in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that city. 2_. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 27 August 1975 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to Leeds City Council, copies of which were circulated to West Yorkshire County Council;, parish councils in the district, Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of the local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies. 3. Leeds City Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration. In doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972 and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No. 6 about the proposed size of the council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward. They were also asked to take into account views expressed to them following their consultation with local interests. We there'fore asked that they should publish details of their provisional proposals about a month before they submitted their draft scheme to us, thus allowing an opportunity for local comment. 4- .Section 7(3) of the Local Government Act 1972 requireethat in metropolitan districts elections shall be by thirds, .Section 6(2)(b) of the Act requires that every metropolitan district shall be divided into wards each returning a number of councillors divisible by three. 5. Oh 30 April 19?6, Leeds City Council presented their draft scheme of representation. They proposed to divide 'the area of the City into 36 wards each returning 3 councillors to produce a council of 108 members. On 21 May 1976, the City Council withdrew the scheme and, on 10 September 1976f submitted a scheme providing for 33 wards each returning 3 councillors to form a council of 99 members. j « 6. We considered the City Council's draft scheme together with related comments. We noted that there was considerable dissatisfaction with the scheme on the grounds that in certain areas local ties had been broken; but we saw no way of meeting these objections without creating unacceptable inequality of representation. We decided to transfer a parish from one proposed ward to another, to change the name of one of the proposed wards and to accept minor boundary adjustments suggested by Ordnance Survey. Subject to these modifications we decided to base our draft proposals on the draft scheme submitted by Leeds City Council. 7. On 12 July 1977 we issued our draft proposals a"nd these were sent to all who had received our consultation letter or had commented on the Council's draft scheme. Leeds City Council were asked to make these draft proposals, and the accompanying map which defined the proposed ward boundaries, available for inspection at their main offices. Representations on our draft proposals were invited from those to whom they were circulated .and, by public notices, from other members of the public and interested bodies. We asked that comments should reach us by 6 September 1977. 8. We received 4 petitions and about 250 letters in response to our draft proposals. Respondents included Leeds City Council, West Yorkshire County Council, parish and town councils, residents1 and ratepayers' associations, amenity groups and committees, trades unions, a womens guild, local political parties and associations, and individual members of the public. * 9. In view of these comments we decided that we needed further information to enable us to reach a conclusion. Therefore in accordance with section 65(2) of the 1972 Act and at our request,.Mr S Astin MBE was appointed an Assistant Commissioner. He was asked to hold a local meeting and to report to us. Notice of the meeting was sent to all who had received our draft proposals or had commented on them, and was published locally. 10. The Assistant Commissioner held a meeting at the Civic Theatre, Leeds, on 13 and 14 December 1977 and inspected certain areas of the district. A copy of his report to us is attached at Schedule 1 to this report. 11. In the light of the discussion at the meeting and his inspection of the areas involved, the Assistant Commissioner recommended that the metropolitan district of the City of Leeds be divided into 33 wards, each to return 3 councillors, as outlined and named in paragraph 7 of his report. 12. We have reviewed our draft proposals in the light of the comments received and of the Assistant Commissioner's report. The Assistant Commissioner's recommendations entailed some considerable adjustment of the detail of the ward pattern of our draft proposals, v/e noted that in making these recommendations he had sought so far as possible to reflect local wishes, including those expressed by the political parties, to distinguish between the rural and urban areas of the City, and to maintain identifiable communities within single wards. We further noted that the standards of representation which evolved from the Assistant Commissioner's recommendations - based, as they were, on more-up-to-date electoral figuree - were better overall than those of our draft proposals. V/e concluded that we should accept the recommendations of the Assistant Commissioner, and subject to some minor boundary adjustments suggested to us by Ordnance Survey, we have formulated our final proposals accordingly. 13. Details of these final proposals are set out in Schedule 2 and 3 to this report and on the attached map. Schedule 2 gives the names of the wards and the number of councillors to be returned by each. A detailed description of the boundaries of the proposed wards, as defined on the map, is set out in Schedule 3- FU3LICATIOJI 14. In accordance with Section 60 (5)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, a copy of this report and a copy of the map are being sent to Leeds City Council and will be available for inspection at the Council's main offices. Copies of this report (without the map) are also being sent to those who received the consultation letter and to those who made comments. L.S. Signed: NICHOLAS MORRISON JOHN M RANKIN (DEPUTY CHAIRMAN) PHYLLIS BOWDEN TYRRELL BROCKBANK G E CHERRY D P HARRISON R R THORNTON LESLIE GRIMSHAW (Secretary) ' 15 MARCH 1979 SCHEDULE 1 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION Review of Electoral Arrangements'- City of Leeds In accordance with the instructions contained in the Commission's letter of 17th November 1977, I conducted a Local Meeting as Assistant Commissioner at the Civic Theatre, Leeds, on Tuesday and Wednesday the 13th arid 14-th December 1977, to hear and to discuss representations with regard to the future electoral arrangements in the City of Leeds - a Metropolitan District in the County of west Yorkshire. 1. ATTENDANCES . I attach as Appendix "A" a list showing the names and addresses of the persons attending the meeting and where appropriate the organisations they represented. 2. COMMISSION'S PROPOSALS The Commission's Draft Proposals for the City of Leeds set out in the Commission's letter to the City Council of 12th July 1977 proposed 33 wards returning; 99 Councillors (3 Councillors per ward).' Prior to the consideration and formulation of the Draft Proposals the Commission had received, first, a draft scheme providing for 36 wards each returning 3 Councillors (a total- Council of 108 members) this being submitted by the City Council in April 1976, the Council then being controlled by a combined Labour and Liberal majority. This suggested provision of 36 wards satisfactorily fitted in wii.h initial ideas of the vjest Yorkshire County Council for there to be a County Council comprising 99 members (Leeds having 36 County Councillors representing the City Council area). Subsequently, however, following the hay 1976 City elections, in which the Conservative i-yrty gained overall control on the City Council, the Council decided to withdraw its 108 members scheme and on 10th September 1976 the Council submitted a new scheme for 33 wards (99 members). In the meantime, there had been discussions between representatives of the five Districts making up the ,.est Yorkshire County and also the County Council, to which representatives of the Boundary Commission had been invited, and at this/neeting an alternative plan emerged for a County Council of ty'd members (of whom the Leeds City area would elect 33 County Councillors). Subsequently, the City of Leeds Labour Party submitted an alternative 99 members scheme sncl this was followed by the re-submission by County Councillor C. Greenfield of the City Council's original lOo members scheme, and then later the labour Party withdrew their own alternative 99 members scheme, in favour of the original r.cheme for the larger Counci.1 Kiufc of 10*; mumbu.rs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANF – Living in Aireborough Research Synthesis
    Aireborough Neighbourhood Forum Research Synthesis ANF – Living in Aireborough Research Synthesis This document contains a synthesis of all the research data that was received from the first stage of a Grounded Theory, qualitative, inductive, research programme: it is not an interpretive report. The work was carried out between June 2012 and April 2013 regarding, what people like, dislike and want to improve about Aireborough. In all research and consultation people have been asked what they do like, followed by what they would like to see improved. The place awareness walks, allowed people to identify particular hot spots and treasures in their area. Aireborough in this case primarily refers to Guiseley, Yeadon, Hawksworth and High Royds: Rawdon is not included in this instance as it has it’s own parish council, however Rawdon is part of the Leeds district of Aireborough, and much of the content of this document is applicable to Rawdon. Research has been synthesised from the following sources, with the aim of covering a wide range of residents, and some businesses:- • Six thinking hat qualitative research June – October 2012 (92 responses including those aged around 16, and those aged around 90) • Local Representative in depth interviews – Summer 2012 (6 responses) • ANF workshop exercises, specifically Mapping Aireborough - February 2012 (52 detailed responses including place awareness walks. And 20 emails with different views.) • Pop Up Exhibition (30 responses from key questions posed ) • Airborough Youth Forum Conference, Schools Drawing and Poetry competitions – March 2013 (over 100 children aged 6 to 17 ) More detailed business research and other primary and secondary evidence gathering for the Neighbourhood Plan is currently underway.
    [Show full text]
  • Results: City of Leeds Summer Development Meet 2016
    City of Leeds Summer Development Meet 2016 John Charles Centre for Sport Saturday 23rd July 2016 (Held Under ASA Laws & ASA Technical Rules) Licence Number: NE160428 EVENT 101 Girls Open 50m Breaststroke 08 Yrs Age Group - Full Results Place Name AaD Club Time FINA Pt 1. Alex Dunn 8 Co Leeds 52.36 166 2. Nell Williams 8 Co Leeds 55.31 141 3. Niamh O'Brien 8 Pudsey 55.58 139 4. Pheanie Banks 8 Co Leeds 55.89 136 5. Hannah Smith 8 Co Leeds 57.20 127 6. Maeve Carroll 8 Co Leeds 58.55 119 7. Emily Sutten 8 TID 1:00.20 109 8. Isabel Sykes 8 TID 1:02.13 99 9. Tilly Carroll 8 John Smeaton 1:03.46 93 10. Phoebe Cole 8 Pudsey 1:04.19 90 11. Emma Wood 8 Kippax 1:04.95 87 12. Amelia Callaghan 8 Pudsey 1:05.48 85 13. Isabelle Heald 8 Morley 1:05.76 84 14. Samantha Knowles 8 Aireborough 1:10.22 68 15. Ava Proctor 8 John Smeaton 1:12.84 61 16. Madison Carter 8 Kirkstall 1:16.79 52 17. Mia Steeden 8 TID 1:27.14 36 18. Lilly Greenwood 8 Morley 1:40.41 23 Phoebe Hirst 8 Kirkstall DNC Samantha Knowles 8 Aireborough DNC Amelia Callaghan 8 Pudsey DNC Grace Milner 8 Co Leeds DQ 1 09 Yrs Age Group - Full Results Place Name AaD Club Time FINA Pt 1. Neve Parker 9 Co Leeds 47.32 225 2. Martha Callaghan 9 Co Leeds 47.77 219 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundary Committee for England Periodic Electoral Review of Leeds
    K ROAD BARWIC School School Def School STANKS R I School N G R O A D PARLINGTON CP C R O PARKLANDS S S G A T E S HAREWOOD WARD KILLINGBECK AND School PENDA'S FIELDS SEACROFT WARD MANSTON CROSS GATES AND WHINMOOR WARD D A O BARWICK IN ELMET AND R Def D R O SCHOLES CP F R E Def B A CROSS GATES ROAD U n S T d A T I O Barnbow Common N R School O A D Seacroft Hospital Def A 6 5 6 2 4 6 A f De R IN G R O A D H A Def L A T U O S N T H O R P E GRAVELEYTHORPE L A N E U f nd e D N EW HO LD NE LA IRK ITK Elmfield WH nd Business U Park Newhold Industrial Estate E Recreation AN AUSTHORPE Y L Ground WB RO BAR School f e School STURTON GRANGE CP D A 6 5 WHITKIRK LANE END AUSTHORPE WEST 6 PARISH WARD AUSTHORPE CP MOOR GARFORTH School EAST GARFORTH The Oval f AUSTHORPE EAST e D PARISH WARD SE School LB Y RO AD f e D Recreation Football Ground Ground Cricket Ground f e D Swillington Common COLTON School CHURCH GARFORTH School Cricket Ground Allotment Gardens LIDGETT f e D School GARFORTH TEMPLE NEWSAM WARD Schools Swillington Common U D A n College O d R m a s a N n w A e e r M n A O le s B t p r R U m o P e p L T S L E C R T H OR D P L E L E A WEST I N E GARFORTH F E L K C I M SE LB Y R O D AD e f A 63 Hollinthorpe Hollinthorpe 6 5 D 6 e A A 63 f A LE ED S School RO A D D i s m a n t le d R a il w a y K ip p a x B e c k Def SWILLINGTON CP Kippax Common Recreation Ground Ledston Newsam GARFORTH AND SWILLINGTON WARD Luck Green Swillington School School Kippax School Allotment Gardens School D A O R E G D I R Allotment Sports Ground Gardens Sports Grounds
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Land Subject to Dog Control Orders Section 1
    Appendix A – Schedule of Land Subject to Dog Control Orders Section 1 – Dog Exclusion (Leeds) Order Table 1 – School grounds where Dog Exclusion (Leeds) Order applies School Name Type Ward Yeadon Westfield Infant School Infant Guiseley & Rawdon Rothwell Haigh Road Infant School Infant Rothwell Adel St John The Baptist Church of England Primary School Primary Adel & Wharfedale Pool-in-Wharfedale Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Primary Adel & Wharfedale Highfield Primary School Primary Alwoodley Blackgates Primary School Primary Ardsley & Robin Hood East Ardsley Primary School Primary Ardsley & Robin Hood Christ The King Catholic Primary School Primary Armley Holy Family Catholic Primary School Primary Armley Raynville Primary School Primary Armley St Bartholomew's Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Primary Armley Beeston Hill St Luke's Church of England Primary School Primary Beeston & Holbeck Cottingley Primary School Primary Beeston & Holbeck Ingram Road Primary School Primary Beeston & Holbeck Bramley St Peter's Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Primary Bramley & Stanningley Summerfield Primary School Primary Bramley & Stanningley Whitecote Primary School Primary Bramley & Stanningley All Saint's Richmond Hill Church of England Primary School Primary Burmantofts & Richmond Hill Brownhill Primary School Primary Burmantofts & Richmond Hill Richmond Hill Primary School Primary Burmantofts & Richmond Hill St Patrick's Catholic Primary School Primary Burmantofts & Richmond Hill
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Parish Council for Rawdon
    Community Governance Review Establishment of a Parish Council for Rawdon Information pack for Electoral Working Group Tuesday 21 August 2012 Electoral Services Level 2 Town Hall The Headrow Leeds LS1 3AD 0113 3952858 [email protected] www.leeds.gov.uk/elections 1 Contents Item Page Number • Map of the proposed Rawdon Parish Council area 3 • Details of current arrangements relating to community 4 - 5 engagement or representation • Details of developments 6 • Demographic information 7 • Electorate 8 • Potential effects of Boundary Commission’s review 9 • Precept 10 - 13 • Transfer of land and property 14 • Summary of representations 15 • Details of representations 16 - 32 • Electoral arrangements o Proposal from Cllr Collins 33 o Officer recommendations 33 – 35 • Appendix A - Directory of Parish/Town Clerks 2012 36 – 41 • Appendix B - Revised Rawdon Parish Council Boundary Map 42 • Appendix C - Map showing split of Polling District GRG 43 2 Map of the proposed Rawdon Parish Council area 3 Current arrangements relating to community engagement / representation Organisation Purpose Rawdon Billing Action Group Joan Roberts - Treasurer 27 Billing View LS19 6PR 0113 2509843 [email protected] Opposing development and protecting greenbelt status on Rawdon Billing and Diana Al- Saadi - Secretary associated land. 15 Billing View LS19 6PR` 0113 2100154 [email protected] Janet Bennett—Chairman Area Committees aim to improve the delivery and co-ordination of local council services and improve the quality of local decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE a Stage Freedom to Love Utd Footy BOOKS
    LEEDS 5 e ag p — t rp exce r he tc Ca INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER Spy • Amazement as Minister visits Leeds `He knows nothing' A fact finding mission to Leeds io,• students Charles Riley and by new Minister for Higher David Shelling recited their Education Robert Jackson. poems against government turned into an acute embarrass- education policy, part of their ment when it became clear that repertoire as the comedy group he was painfully uninformed on 'Codmen Inc'. the country's education situa- The 'alternative' demo was tion. organised by the Students Un- Student leaders were clearly ion to avoid the more orthodox amazed at the ministers lack of method of jeering and egg knowledge. Poly Union presi- throwing . dent Ed Gamble said. "I fear At the University no such for Higher Education with this originality was in evidence. man at the helm. He know no- Near 150 people turned up to thing." the disappointingly small demo LUU general secretary Ger- outside the great Hall, which he maine Varnay was also none visited during the afternoon. too impressed. Nominated by the Exec to meet the minister LULI administration officer and put forward the Unions Austen Earth put the low turn- opposition to reduced govern- out down to the time of year, ment funding. she left the con- "It's very difficult to motivate frontation frustrated. people at this time of year. 'He was so patronising and They're heavily involved in condescending. Predictably he their social lives." he said. didn't listen to a word I said.' Nevertheless the crowd was The day long trip was heavily able to produce an astonishing punctuated by demonstrations volume of noise on the arrival • Robert Jackson MP.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • 56 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    56 bus time schedule & line map 56 Moor Grange <-> Leeds City Centre View In Website Mode The 56 bus line (Moor Grange <-> Leeds City Centre) has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Moor Grange <-> Leeds City Centre: 7:30 PM - 11:10 PM (2) Moor Grange <-> Whinmoor: 5:15 AM - 10:40 PM (3) Swarcliffe <-> Moor Grange: 5:07 AM (4) Whinmoor <-> Leeds City Centre: 11:10 PM - 11:40 PM (5) Whinmoor <-> Moor Grange: 5:15 AM - 10:40 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 56 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 56 bus arriving. Direction: Moor Grange <-> Leeds City Centre 56 bus Time Schedule 26 stops Moor Grange <-> Leeds City Centre Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:30 PM - 11:10 PM Latchmere Drive, Moor Grange Latchmere Green, Leeds Tuesday 7:30 PM - 11:10 PM Latchmere Road, Moor Grange Wednesday 7:30 PM - 11:10 PM Old Farm Approach, Moor Grange Thursday 7:30 PM - 11:10 PM Friday 7:30 PM - 11:10 PM Old Oak Drive, West Park Old Oak Garth, Leeds Saturday 11:10 PM Beckett Park, West Park Ghyll Road, West Park 56 bus Info Woodbridge Crescent, Beckett Park Direction: Moor Grange <-> Leeds City Centre Stops: 26 Woodbridge Place, Beckett Park Trip Duration: 22 min Queenswood Drive, Leeds Line Summary: Latchmere Drive, Moor Grange, Latchmere Road, Moor Grange, Old Farm Approach, Queenswood Road, Beckett Park Moor Grange, Old Oak Drive, West Park, Beckett Jaques Close, Leeds Park, West Park, Ghyll Road, West Park, Woodbridge Crescent, Beckett Park, Woodbridge Place, Beckett Eden
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item No
    AGENDA ITEM NO.: Originator: P N Marrington Tel 39 51151 REPORT OF HEAD OF SCRUTINY AND MEMBER DEVELOPMENT MEETING: OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE DATE : 4TH JANUARY 2006 SUBJECT : CALL IN OF DECISION – BRIEFING PAPER Electoral Wards Affected Specific Implications For : Ethnic Minorities Women Disabled People 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 In accordance with the Council’s Constitution, a decision of the Executive Board has been Called In.1 The background papers to this particular decision are set out as a separate agenda item and appropriate witnesses have been invited to give supporting evidence. 1.2 This report advises the Overview and Scrutiny Committee on the procedural aspects of Calling In the decision. 2.0 REVIEWING THE DECISION 2.1 The process of reviewing the decision is as follows: • Members who have requested the Call In invited to explain their concern/reason for Call In request. • Relevant Executive Board Member, or nominee, asked to explain decision (for Executive Board decisions). • Further questioning from the Scrutiny Board as appropriate. 1 Scrutiny Board Procedure Rules Paragraph 23 3.0 OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD 3.1 Having reviewed the decision, the Overview and Scrutiny Committee will need to agree what action it wishes to take. In doing so, it may pursue one of three courses of action as set out below: Option 1- Release the decision for implementation 3.2 Having reviewed this decision, the Overview and Scrutiny Committee may decide to release it for implementation. If Overview and Scrutiny Committee chooses this option, the decision will be immediately released for implementation and the decision may not be Called In again.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 4. Hierarchy of Centres WETHERBY
    Map 4. Hierarchy of Centres WETHERBY 27 Key OTLEY COLLINGHAM A1 (M) 9 City Centre 4 22 HAREWOOD BOSTON SPA A659 A660 A58 Town Centres A61 1 Armley BARDSEY 2 Bramley 3 Chapel Allerton BRAMHOPE 4 Colton (Selby Road) BRAMHAM 5 Cross Gates 6 Dewsbury Road 12 7 Farsley 9 8 Garforth GUISELEY 9 Guiseley, Otley Road 28 SCARCROFT 10 Halton 11 Harehills Lane YEADON 12 Headingley COOKRIDGE 1 29 THORNER 13 Holt Park 13 ALWOODLEY A64 14 Horsforth, Town Street 27 15 Hunslet 16 Kirkstall A65A6A65 18 A6120A6A61661201212020 17 Meanwood 19 26 3311 18 Middleton Ring Road HORSFORTHHORSFOS RTHRTTHTH 19 Moor Allerton 141 20 Morley CHAPELCHAC PEL 21 Oakwood 6 AALLALLERTONERTRTR ONN 17 BARWICKBARARW 22 Otley 3 23 Pudsey 14 3333 1177 IN ELMETELM A657A6577 25 SEACROFTSEASE CRROR FTT 24 Richmond Hill 221 A1 (M) CALVERLEYCACALC VERRLEYY HEADINGLEYHHEAHEADIND GLLEY 25 Rothwell 1212 16 26 RODLEYRODR LEYY 26 Seacroft 133 8 27 Wetherby 1166 1199 28 Yeadon 7 2 28 FARSLEYFARARSLSLES Y HAREHILLSHAREHILLS 11 5 2121 5 M1 A647A6477 300 BRAMLEYBRABBRRARAMMLEY Local Centres 22 24 1 Alwoodley King Lane 23 1 CITYY 10 2 Beeston Hill Local Centre HALTONHALTON 8 7 ARMLEY CENTRECCENENTRTRETR 4 3 Beeston Local Centre GARFORTH 4 Boston Spa PUDSEY 5 Burley Lodge (Woodsley Road) Local Centre 15 6 Butcher Hill Local Centre 23 7 Chapeltown (Pudsey) Local Centre A63 2 15 8 Chapeltown Road Local Centre 6 A642 9 Collingham Local Centre 10 Drighlington Local Centre 3 KIPPAX BEESTON M621 11 East Ardsley Local Centre 20 12 Guiseley Oxford Road/Town Gate Town Centre 32 LEDSHAM 13 Harehills Corner
    [Show full text]
  • Mines and Minerals Rights Relating to HG2-124 and BL1-40
    Leeds Revised Submission Site Allocation Plan (SAP) Matter 7, Agenda Item 4 – Mines and Minerals Rights relating to HG2-124 and BL1-40 Position Statement between: (1) BDW Homes and Taylor Wimpey ("BDW/TW") (2) Mr Christopher Makin (3) Leeds City Council ("LCC") Introduction 1 At the close of the Examination in Public Hearing (EiP) held on 2 August 2018, the Inspectors' requested the relevant parties (as noted above) to provide a Position Statement, setting out any areas of agreement and disagreement regarding the issue of mines and minerals rights relating to HG2-124 and/or BL1-40 (together the "Site"). 2 This Position Statement has been prepared and submitted in response to the Inspectors' request. It sets out the factual and legal background to the land ownership of the relevant sites (so far as it is relevant to the issue of mines and minerals) and addresses Mr Makin's stated ownership of the mines and minerals. 3 Copies of the relevant title registers and plans as well as the Conveyance dated 30 August 1938 made between (1) Alvary Douglas Frederick Gascoigne and (2) Walter Dawson (the "1938 Conveyance") were provided to the Inspectors at the close of the EiP. Land Ownership of HG2-124 and BL1-40 – Agreed Facts 4 Under Title number WYK586916, Mrs Jean Makin, is registered with an absolute freehold title to the land known as land on the north side of Selby Road, Micklefield (the "Property") and which comprises part of HG2-124 and all of BL1-40. Entry Number 2 of the Property Register confirms that there is an express exception of mines and minerals together with the ancillary powers of working.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Plaques Erected Since the Publication of This Book
    Leeds Civic Trust Blue Plaques No Title Location Unveiler Date Sponsor 1 Burley Bar Stone Inside main entrance of Leeds Lord Marshall of Leeds, President of Leeds Civic 27 Nov ‘87 Leeds & Holbeck Building Society Building Society, The Headrow Trust, former Leader of Leeds City Council Leeds 1 2 Louis Le Prince British Waterways, Leeds Mr. William Le Prince Huettle, great-grandson 13 Oct ‘88 British Waterways Board Bridge, Lower Briggate, Leeds of Louis Le Prince (1st Plaque) 1 3 Louis Le Prince BBC Studios, Woodhouse Sir Richard Attenborough, Actor, Broadcaster 14 Oct ‘88 British Broadcasting Corporation Lane, Leeds 2 and Film Director (2nd Plaque) 4 Temple Mill Marshall Street, Leeds 11 Mr Bruce Taylor, Managing Director of Kay’s 14 Feb ‘89 Kay & Company Ltd 5 18 Park Place 18 Park Place, Leeds 1 Sir Christopher Benson, Chairman, MEPC plc 24 Feb ‘89 MEPC plc 6 The Victoria Hotel Great George Street, Leeds 1 Mr John Power MBE, Deputy Lord Lieutenant of 25 Apr ‘89 Joshua Tetley & Sons Ltd West Yorkshire 7 The Assembly Rooms Crown Street, Leeds 2 Mr Bettison (Senior) 27 Apr ‘89 Mr Bruce Bettison, then Owner of Waterloo Antiques 8 Kemplay’s Academy Nash’s Tudor Fish Restaurant, Mr. Lawrence Bellhouse, Proprietor, Nash’s May ‘89 Lawrence Bellhouse, Proprietor, Nash’s off New Briggate, Leeds 1 Tudor Fish Restaurant Tudor Fish Restaurant 9 Brodrick’s Buildings Cookridge Street, Leeds 2 Mr John M. Quinlan, Director, Trinity Services 20 Jul ‘89 Trinity Services (Developers) 10 The West Bar Bond Street Centre, Boar Councillor J.L. Carter, Lord Mayor of Leeds 19 Sept ‘89 Bond Street Shopping Centre Merchants’ Lane, Leeds 1 Association Page 1 of 14 No Title Location Unveiler Date Sponsor 11 Park Square 45 Park Square, Leeds 1 Mr.
    [Show full text]