DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 City Council District Profiles 2015 City

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 City Council District Profiles 2015 City M A N H AT TA N CITY COUNCIL HARLEM DISTRICT MEER 20142015 CityCity7 CouncilCouncil DistrictDistrictE 110 ST ProfilesProfiles W 96 ST EAST HARLEM 45 E 98 ST W 86 ST 8 HUDSON E 97 ST Parkland HUDSON RIVER E 96 ST COUNTY E 95 1 Bryant Park (NEW JERSEY) UPPER JACQUELINE E 94 ST ST WEST KENNEDY E 93 ST 2 Park Avenue Malls• SIDE ONASSIS RESERVOIR • W 79 ST 3 WNYC Transmitter Park CARNEGIE HILL 4 St. Vartan Park• E 87 ST 5 Asser Levy Playground E 86 ST E 85 ST 6 Bushwick Inlet Park E 84 Carnegie Hill W 72 ST E 83 ST ST 7 Hunter’s Point South Park E 82 ST Upper East Side 6 E 81 • W ST YORKVILLE 8 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza E 80 ST Midtown ARK 9 Murphy’s Brother’s THE LAKE Murray Hill TRAL P Playground LINCOLN UPPER Times Square EN BOAT SQUARE W 66 ST C EAST 22 BASIN E 78 ST 10 Robert Moses Playground SIDE Midtown South E 73 E 79 ST 11 Grand Army Plaza ST Stuyvesant Town E 72 ST ASTORIA BLV E 77 ST D E 71 12 Peter Detmold Park ST E 76 ST E 75 ST 4 E 74 ST 13 East River Esplanade E 70 ST VE W 57 ST A 2 E 69 ST 14 Tramway Plaza SON E 68 ST I E 66 STE 67 ST LENOX 15 Ralph Bunche Park AD E HILL M 65 E 64 ST VE THE POND ST 16 Sutton Parks A E 63 7 ST ASTORIA E 62 17 MacArthur Park ST VE A 6 11 18 Mary O’Connor Y ROOSEVELT • A 5 Playground W ISLAND D VE A A 3 19 Herald Square O 14 D R V B VE VE L VE A B A 20 Tudor Grove Playground A VE 8 N A O 0 TURTLE 21 ST 1 PARK N 23 21R Recreation Center 54 HUDSON BAY E RIVER HUDSON V TIMES MIDTOWN 22 Trygve Lie Plaza YARDS LEXINGTON SQUARE E 50 ST 21 23 Father Duffy Square VE E RAVENSWOOD 36 A 49 A 5 • VE W 34 ST ST 16 24 East River Park (S) 3 39 AVE 1 E 45 ST LONG E 41 ST 12 ISLAND E 40 ST E 42 ST 8 17 CITY E 39 ST E 38 ST 19 E 37 ST Legend MIDTOWN E 36 ST 1815 SOUTH 20 2210 1/4 Mile E 30 E 29 ST ST MURRAY 26 City SCouncilUNNYSID DistrictsE W 23 ST E 28 ST 4 HILL 13 n CHELSEA City, State, and HUNTERS W 18 POINT Federal Parkland S VE 4 T A 7 9 AVE 2 2 n KIPS VE SUNNYSIDE A Playgrounds E 23 ST EAST W 14 ST E 25 ST BAY 1 GARDENS RIVER N CREEK TOW LO n R W N NE G D ISLA Schoolyards-to-Playgrounds R ND EX D PWY F n GRAMERCY BLISSVILLE Community Gardens WEST VILLAGE 5 n E 20 ST 33 Swimming Pools UNION GREENPOINT l SQUARE STUYVESANT Recreation Centers TOWN l 9 GREENPOINT AVE Public Plazas MCGUINNESS BLVD 3 l VE A E 14 ST A Privately Owned VE B EAST A 1 VILLAGE Public30 Spaces (POPS) VE C A VE NASSAU A SOHO (S) New York State park PRINCE ST (F) National Park Service park 6 • E HOUSTON ST Home to an active volunteer group GRAND ST 24 TRIBECA 34 LITTLE ITALY 0 ¼ ½ Mile M A N H AT TA N CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT 2015 District Statistics 4 PARKS ACREAGE CD4 CITYWIDE1 RESOURCES FOR YOUR COMMUNITY 2% Total District Land (acres) 2,138 266,690 CITY COUNCIL MEMBER Dan Garodnick City, State & Federal Parkland2 (acres) 40 50,499 www.garodnick.com Percent Parkland 2% 19% 212-818-0580 Parks & Playgrounds3 (acres) 26 23,635 Percent parkland of MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 5 total district acreage 212-465-0907 Percent Parks & Playgrounds 1% 9% MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 6 POPULATION & PARK ACCESS CD4 CITYWIDE 212-319-3750 Resident Population 164,569 8,128,980 MANHATTAN COMMUNITY BOARD 8 49 Ranking of park & 212-758-4340 Parks & Playground acres per 1,000 residents 0.2 2.9 playground acres per 1,000 residents CITY OF NEW YORK Residents within 5 minutes’ walk of a park 49% 61% 1= highest, 51= lowest 311 or www.nyc.gov Residents under 18 12% 22% STATE & FEDERAL REPRESENTATIVES 31 www.elections.state.ny.us Park & Playground acres per 1,000 children 1.4 13.3 Ranking of residents within 5 minutes’ walk PARTNERSHIPS FOR PARKS Residents over 65 19% 12% of a park www.cityparksfoundation.org/partnerships-for-parks 1= highest, 51= lowest Park & Playground acres per 1,000 seniors 0.8 23.3 PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING IN NYC council.nyc.gov/pb PARK AMENITIES CD4 CITYWIDE NEW YORKERS FOR PARKS Community Gardens 0 11 www.ny4p.org | 212-838-9410 Recreation Centers 2 1 0.5 The Arthur Ross Center for Parks and Open Spaces Number of playgrounds Playgrounds 9 34 per 1,000 children 55 Broad Street, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10004 Swimming Pools 4 2 For over 100 years, New Yorkers for Parks PARKS INSPECTION PROGRAM RATINGS, has built, protected and promoted parks and FISCAL YEAR 2014 CD4 CITYWIDE open spaces in New York City. Today, NY4P is the 95% 95% Parks “Acceptable” for Condition 95% 86% 94% 96% citywide independent organization championing Condition Cleanliness Parks “Acceptable” for Cleanliness 95% 91% quality parks and open spaces for all New Yorkers in all neighborhoods. PARK FUNDING, FISCAL YEAR 2010–2014 CD4 CITYWIDE 46 Data Sources Completed Projects (millions) $0.4 $26.1 Rank of Funding per All data is from 2014 unless noted. Parks Acreage: NYC Park & Playground acre Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), NYC Department Funding per Park & 1= highest, 51= lowest of City Planning (DCP), National Park Service (NPS), New York Playground acre (millions) $0.02 $0.14 State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation (OPRHP). Population & Park Access: American Community Survey CIVIC ENGAGEMENT CD4 CITYWIDE (ACS) 2007-2011, Infoshare.org, DPR, DCP. Park Amenities: DPR, GrowNYC. PIP Ratings: DPR. Park Funding,: DPR, FY 2010-2014. Registered Voters 81% 73% Civic Engagement: NYC Board of Elections 2011, NYC Depart- 81% ment of Information Technology and Telecommunications Park-related 311 calls per 1,000 residents 3.1 6.8 Registered voters (DOITT), and Partnerships for Parks. Socioeconomics: Park Volunteer Groups 6 10 ACS 2007-2011, Infoshare.org. Map Data SOCIOECONOMICS CD4 CITYWIDE All data is from 2014: DPR, DOT, DCP, ESRI, Median Household Income $74,475 $51,270 2 GrowNYC, NPS, OPRHP. Ranking of average Project Staff Population in Poverty 7% 19% median income Lucy Robson, Research & Planning Analyst 1= highest, 51= lowest Haley Cox, Research & Planning Intern Children Receiving Public Assistance 3% 33% Michael Bierman & Rori Spivey, Graphic Design Special Thanks to Alyson Beha Copyright 2015. New Yorkers for Parks. All rights reserved. 1 Value for the city as a whole; when italicized, average for all City Council Districts. 2 Parklands are all city land under the jurisdiction of the New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation, and the National Park Service. 3 Parks & Playground excludes unvisitable properties, such as greenstreets, triangles, parking lots, undeveloped land, and highway properties. www.ny4p.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Avenue Properties Rezoning Final Scope of Work for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
    First Avenue Properties Rezoning Final Scope of Work for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement A. PROJECT IDENTIFICATION INTRODUCTION East River Realty Company, LLC (ERRC) proposes to rezone and obtain other land use approvals, including special permits, for four parcels along First Avenue in midtown Manhattan for predominantly residential and commercial mixed-use redevelopment. Owned by ERCC, the four parcels are located between East 35th Street and East 41st Street (see Figure 1). The specific addresses are 616 First Avenue, 685 First Avenue, 700 First Avenue, and 708 First Avenue. The proposed actions would permit development of the parcels with a mix of residential, commercial, retail, community facility, and open space uses. It is expected that development would be complete in 2014. Potential development resulting from Con Edison’s sale of the properties to ERRC was the subject of a Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS) completed by the New York State Public Service Commission (PSC) in January 2004. Because the development program under the proposed actions may result in significant adverse environmental impacts not identified in the FGEIS, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being prepared. The SEIS will analyze the extent to which the development and zoning actions as currently proposed could potentially result in any significant adverse environmental impacts not previously identified in the FGEIS. Specifically, the SEIS will consider differences between the programs and site plans described in the FGEIS and the current proposed program, site plan, and zoning actions and will consider changes in background conditions in the study areas to reflect the current status of planned and proposed projects and the new anticipated year of completion for the current proposed development program.
    [Show full text]
  • Rnc Intelligence Situation Report
    RNC INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT Thursday, 09-02 1700 hours FINAL REPORT The following is a synopsis of reported activities and relevant responses covering the period of 09/02/2004 0700 hours through 09/02/2004 1700 hours. TODAY'S EVENTS ----United for Peace and-Justice candle-light vigil, today, at approximately 2000 hours, in Union Square Park, East 15t Street and Broadway. The likely number of participants is unknown and no permit was issued. o UPDATE- Anti-war group "Not in Our Name" distributing leaflets encouraging supporters to participate in the above event between 1700 and 1900 hours. o Not in Our Name calling for a march from Union Square Park to Madison Square Garden. • "IAC/A.N.S.W.E. R. Coalition " to hold an anti-war demonstration event, today, between 1800 and 2200 Hours, inside the main demonstration area located at 30th Street and 8th Avenue. Organizers expect as many as 2,000 participants. This event has been approved by PBMS. o UPDATE- "Protest Warriors" to conduct counter protest, today between 1930 and 2100 hours at West 31St Street and 8t Avenue. The event was organized to counter protest the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (ANSWER). The likely number of participants is unknown. No permit was issued. Law Enforcement Sensitive Not for public release. This document is for official use only.. Limit dissemination to law enforcement personnel and designated local, state, federal and military officials with a need to know. This product should NOT be placed on any Internet router outside your agency. This document and/or any portion of this document can not be reproduced copied or edited in writing or in verbal form without the express permission of the Republican National Convention Fusion Center.
    [Show full text]
  • City Plots Huge Land Deal with U.N. Garment Center Rezoning Shelved
    20100614-NEWS--0001-NAT-CCI-CN_-- 6/11/2010 8:11 PM Page 1 REPORT HEALTH CARE HE’S THE MR. FIX-IT OF THE HOSPITAL BIZ And now he’s set his sights on Manhattan P. 15 ® Plus: a new acronym! P. 15 INSIDE VOL. XXVI, NO. 24 WWW.CRAINSNEWYORK.COM JUNE 14-20, 2010 PRICE: $3.00 TOP STORIES Gulf oil disaster Garment spills into NY lives center PAGE 2 High expectations for NYC’s tallest rezoning apartment tower PAGE 3 shelved Wall Street’s Protests, new views on summer bummer area’s value block plans IN THE MARKETS, PAGE 4 to decimate district Why LeBron James can have his cake BY ADRIANNE PASQUARELLI and eat it, too after months of protests, New York NEW YORK, NEW YORK, P. 6 City is quietly backing away from a se- ries of highly controversial proposals to rezone the 13-block garment center. Among those was a plan announced BUSINESS LIVES last April that would have taken the 9.5 million-square-foot manufacturing district and sewn it into a single 300,000-square-foot building on West 38th Clocking Street. $10B getty images “We always knew ANNUAL BY JEREMY SMERD that was kind of a CONTRIBUTION to the ridiculous proposal,” New York City in march 2003, executives at software company says Nanette Lepore, a economy Science Applications International Corp. were fashion designer who GOTHAM GIGS CityTime scrambling for a way out of a deal with the city to has been at the forefront of the battle to build a timekeeping system for its 167,000 munic- fight rezoning of the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of the Playground: the Spaces of Play of Robert Moses and Aldo Van Eyck Nicolás Stutzin
    FIG 1 Jekerstraat, Amsterdam. Aldo Van Eyck, 1949. © Nicolás Stutzin, 2013 Politics of the Playground: the sPaces of Play of robert Moses and aldo van eyck Nicolás Stutzin Profesor, Facultad de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño, Universidad Diego Portales Santiago, Chile As a machine for the production of common experiences, the playground was one of the most promoted urban spaces in the mid-twentieth century. Through the surprising parallel between Aldo van Eyck’s plan in Amsterdam and Robert Moses’s plan for New York, this article proves that such a politically correct program can be grounded on completely opposing world views; that is, that a common space can also be a place to experiment divergent political visions. Keywords · New York, Amsterdam, ideology, public space, city Some months after taking the position as Commissioner of the New York City Parks Department in 1934, Robert Moses inaugurated a series of nine playgrounds, the first of a massive initiative which would lead to the creation of nearly 700 new infant playgrounds in the course of 26 years during which he was in charge of the greatest public infrastructure developments of the city. Under Moses’s responsibility, between 1934 and 1960, the city achieved to add an average of one new playground every two weeks. In 1947, Aldo van Eyck, the then debutant architect of Amsterdam’s Public Infrastructure Department, was able to see the first of the over 700 small playgrounds he would design in residual spaces and parks throughout the city in the following 31 years and that would become a central part of his career.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Social Conditions
    Chapter 4: Social Conditions A. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY This chapter addresses a variety of issues that support social conditions, including population and housing characteristics, community facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The discussion of social conditions considers the entire MESA study area (depicted in Figure 3-1 in Chapter 3, above) with particular focus on the project corridor—the routes proposed for the various project alternatives—where the greatest potential for change would occur. Because none of the project alternatives have the potential to change social conditions in the secondary study area, where Build Alternatives 1 and 2 would add service along an existing subway line, this analysis is of the primary study area only. The analysis was conducted by first compiling existing data for population and housing, com- munity facilities and open spaces, and neighborhood character. The source for the population and housing data is the 1990 Census of Population and Housing. The inventory of community facilities is based on Community District Needs (1997) for Manhattan’s Community Boards, the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Property Lists (dated November 4, 1996), supplementary information provided by the various Community Boards within the study area, and the informa- tion gathered for the analysis of land use, zoning, and public policy in Chapter 3. The assessment of neighborhood character is based on information gathered for other chapters of this document, particularly including the analyses of land use (Chapter 3) and visual and aesthetic considerations (Chapter 6). After assessing the existing conditions in the study area, the expected changes in the future are considered, based on information compiled in Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011)
    City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Borou Block Lot Address Parcel Name gh 1 2 1 4 SOUTH STREET SI FERRY TERMINAL 1 2 2 10 SOUTH STREET BATTERY MARITIME BLDG 1 2 3 MARGINAL STREET MTA SUBSTATION 1 2 23 1 PIER 6 PIER 6 1 3 1 10 BATTERY PARK BATTERY PARK 1 3 2 PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK 1 3 3 PETER MINUIT PLAZA PETER MINUIT PLAZA/BATTERY PK 1 6 1 24 SOUTH STREET VIETNAM VETERANS PLAZA 1 10 14 33 WHITEHALL STREET 1 12 28 WHITEHALL STREET BOWLING GREEN PARK 1 16 1 22 BATTERY PLACE PIER A / MARINE UNIT #1 1 16 3 401 SOUTH END AVENUE BATTERY PARK CITY STREETS 1 16 12 MARGINAL STREET BATTERY PARK CITY Page 1 of 1390 09/28/2021 City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Agency Current Uses Number Structures DOT;DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;NO 2 USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;LONG-TERM 1 AGREEMENT;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DSBS NO USE-NON RES STRC;TRANSIT 1 SUBSTATION DSBS IN USE-TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- 1 DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;FINAL COMMITMNT-DISP PARKS PARK 6 PARKS PARK 3 PARKS PARK 3 PARKS PARK 0 SANIT OFFICE 1 PARKS PARK 0 DSBS FERRY TERMINAL;IN USE- 1 TENANTED;FINAL COMMITMNT- DISP;LONG-TERM AGREEMENT;NO USE;WATERFRONT PROPERTY DOT PARK;ROAD/HIGHWAY 10 PARKS IN USE-TENANTED;SHORT-TERM 0 Page 2 of 1390 09/28/2021 City-Owned Properties Based on Suitability of City-Owned and Leased Property for Urban Agriculture (LL 48 of 2011) Land Use Category Postcode Police Prct
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY BOARD 3 59 East 4Th Street - New York, NY 10003 Phone (212) 533 -5300 – [email protected]
    Community/Borough Board Recommendation Pursuant to the Uniform Land Use Review Procedure Application #: Project Name: CEQR Number: Borough(s): Community District Number(s): Please use the above application number on all correspondence concerning this application SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Complete this form and return to the Department of City Planning by one of the following options: • EMAIL (recommended): Send email to [email protected] and include the following subject line: (CB or BP) Recommendation + (6-digit application number), e.g., “CB Recommendation #C100000ZSQ” • MAIL: Calendar Information Office, City Planning Commission, 120 Broadway, 31st Floor, New York, NY 10271 • FAX: to (212) 720-3488 and note “Attention of the Calendar Office” 2. Send one copy of the completed form with any attachments to the applicant's representative at the address listed below, one copy to the Borough President, and one copy to the Borough Board, when applicable. Docket Description: Applicant(s): Applicant’s Representative: Recommendation submitted by: Date of public hearing: Location: Was a quorum present? YES NO A public hearing requires a quorum of 20% of the appointed members of the board, but in no event fewer than seven such members. Date of Vote: Location: RECOMMENDATION Approve Approve With Modifications/Conditions Disapprove Disapprove With Modifications/Conditions Please attach any further explanation of the recommendation on additional sheets, as necessary. Voting # In Favor: # Against: # Abstaining: Total members appointed
    [Show full text]
  • MANHATTAN COMMUNITY DISTRICT 6 Oversight Block Lot Facility Name Facility Address Facility Type Capacity / Type Agency
    Selected Facilities and Program Sites Page 1 of 15 in New York City, release 2015 MANHATTAN COMMUNITY DISTRICT 6 Oversight Block Lot Facility Name Facility Address Facility Type Capacity / Type Agency SCHOOLS Public Elementary and Secondary Schools 904 24 47 AMER SIGN LANG & ENG LOWER 223 E 23 St Elementary School - Public 213 Children NYC DOE 913 7 PS 116 MARY LINDLEY MURRAY 210 E 33 St Elementary School - Public 719 Children NYC DOE 924 55 PS 40 AUGUSTUS SAINT-GAUDENS 320 E 19 St Elementary School - Public 599 Children NYC DOE 1330 13 PS 59 BEEKMAN HILL INTERNATIONAL 231-249 E 56 St Elementary School - Public 596 Children NYC DOE 926 1 JHS 104 SIMON BARUCH 330 E 21 St Intermediate/JHS - Public 1028 Children NYC DOE 925 12 MS 255 SALK SCHOOL OF SCIENCE 319 E 19 St Intermediate/JHS - Public 379 Children NYC DOE 922 8 INST FOR COLLABORATIVE EDUCATION 345 E 15 St Junior/Senior High School - Public 463 Children NYC DOE 872 57 ACADEMY FOR SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 40 Irving Pl High School - Public 239 Children NYC DOE 904 24 AMERICAN SIGN LANG & ENG SECONDAR 223 E 23 St High School - Public 179 Children NYC DOE 1330 13 ART AND DESIGN HIGH SCHOOL 231-249 E 56 St High School - Public 1426 Children NYC DOE 872 57 GRAMERCY ARTS HIGH SCHOOL 40 Irving Pl High School - Public 554 Children NYC DOE 872 57 HIGH SCHOOL-LANGUAGE AND 40 Irving Pl High School - Public 347 Children NYC DOE DIPLOMACY 922 8 HS-HEALTH PROFESSIONS & HUMAN SVCS 345 E 15 St High School - Public 1697 Children NYC DOE 872 57 INTERNATIONAL HS AT UNION SQUARE 40 Irving Pl High School
    [Show full text]
  • Living Peace
    LIVING PEACE The 2019 Art of Peace Tyler Peace Poetry Anthology LIVING PEACE 2019 Art of Peace Poetry Anthology LIVING PEACE – THE 2019 ART OF PEACE POETRY TYLER ANTHOLOGY Copyright, 2019 All rights reserved to the included poets. Other than printing this document for personal use, no poems may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the included poets. Poetry, Peace, International Day of Peace Published by InSpiritry Contributing Editor, Anne McCrady InSpiritry 8936 Cherokee Tr. Tyler, TX 75703 ii LIVING PEACE 2019 Art of Peace Poetry Anthology FOREWORD Each year when we begin planning for our Tyler, Texas, Art of Peace celebration of the United Nations International Day of Peace, September 21, we select a theme to inspire our poetry and visual art entries. This year’s theme is Living Peace. This summer, from across Texas and the United States and around the world, over 130 poems arrived! We were delighted to read the many ways poets interpreted and responded to the idea of Living Peace. After weeks of reading and re-reading every poem received—and being inspired by all of them—our committee made the difficult decision of choosing those to be included in the 2019 anthology. What a surprise to find the selected poets were as wide-ranging as the original submissions. Peace is alive and well in the world! In these pages, you will find outstanding poems from poets in over a dozen Texas cities (Tyler, Temple, Arp, The Woodlands, Houston, Temple, Round Rock, Austin, Dripping Springs, San Antonio, Lytle, Benbrook, Fort Worth, Grand Prairie, and Copperas Cove), from nine other states (Kansas, Ohio, Pennsylvania, California, Minnesota, Massachusetts, Florida, and New York, Virginia), as well as from nine countries beyond the USA (United Kingdom, Canada, Ireland, India, Bulgaria, Israel, Nigeria, Trinidad & Tobago, and Australia)! The collection moves from moments and environs of peace through evidence of the anguishing need for peace to ways we can find and build peace.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 City Council District Profiles 2021 Open Space Profiles
    7 A-B-C 4-6-6 Express 1-2 MANHATTAN 2021 COMMUNITYQ DISTRICT 1-2 4-6-6 Express A-B-C-D Open Space 72nd St 4 2014 City Council District Profiles Profiles 6 5 N-R-W N-Q-R-W F-Q 66th St F R B-D-E 4-5-6-6 Legend A-C-E N Express 1-2 N-R-W 1/4 Mile 10thAve 59th St 8 Community Districts E-M ● Subway Stations N-Q-R-W 58th St n 9th Ave F City, State, and 57th St Federal Parkland B-D-F-M 56th St n 1 Madison Ave Playgrounds E-M 55th St A-C-E 4-6-6 Express n Schoolyards to Playgrounds 54th St n Public Plazas S 53rd St 17 52nd St Sutton Pl N n 41 Ave 7-7 Express 13 Swimming Pools 5th Ave 51st St 1-2-3 49th St n Dog Runs 8th Ave N-Q-R-W 50th St 18 7-7 48th St B-D-F-M ● Community Gardens 47th St Express ● F 5 46th St Recreation Centers 2 Ave 10 Vanderbilt Ave ● POPS S 45th St A-C-E ● K-12 Schools 7h Ave 4 6 Broadway 4-5-6-6 e 44th St v ● Public Libraries ExpressA 7-7 Express Vernon Blvd ● Hospitals & Clinics 43rd St 1-2-3 41st St 42nd St N-Q-R-W 9 20 Highest COVID-19 40th St B-D-F-M 7 12 Mortality Zip Codes 39th St 2019 Park Ave 44 Dr 14 F Roosevelt Dr ParklandE-M 1-2 6th Ave Lexington Ave 7-7 Express 1 Asser Levy Playground Court Sq 35th St 2 Augustus St.
    [Show full text]
  • To Continue to Make Murray Hill a Highly Desirable Place to Live, Work E and Visit
    2011–2012 A publication of the Murray Hill Neighborhood Association Murray Hill No. 4 …to continue to make Murray Hill a highly desirable place to live, work e and visit. Lif Winter One Enchanted Evening at the Polish Consulate Frederic Chopin, Richard Golub, and the Polish Consulate were the headliners at the Preservation and Design Award Evening on Thursday, October 13. Chopin provided the music, performed by pianist Domi- nic Meiman, in a room of surpassing splendor on the second floor of this impres- sive Beaux Arts mansion, which is now home to the Polish Consulate in New York. Before a sellout crowd of 180, Mr. Meiman played a generous Chopin program, beginning with the Grand Waltz No. 5, Op. 42, and finishing with what seemed Program Committee members, left to right: Irma Worrell Fisher, Dominic Meiman played Chopin. like étude after étude after Enid Klass, Susan Demmet and Minor Bishop. Rear right, former Photo: Sami Steigmann étude. Meanwhile, the MHNA President Steve Weingrad. painted cherubs and angels Photo: Sami Steigmann amidst the room’s gold latticework seemed to look down in rapt attention. Minor Bishop praised the meticu- “What a neighborhood!” lousness of the Polish restoration. Mrs. Junczyk- Ziomecka “In cleaning the entire building, exclaimed in this is what actually preserved it,” accepting the Mr. Bishop said. “From windows to award. When steelwork to stone, this is a heroic she became example of what preservation is Consul General and provides a chance to see what a year and a half this building really looked like, the ago, she admitted that actual color of the stone… I applaud she had looked all over their effort.” Manhattan for a place to Susan Demmet and Irma Wor- live.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report on Park Maintenance
    Annual Report on Park Maintenance Fiscal Year 2019 City of New York Parks & Recreation Bill de Blasio, Mayor Mitchell J. Silver, FAICP, Commissioner Annual Report on Park Maintenance Fiscal Year 2019 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 Understanding Park Maintenance Needs ............................................................................... 1 How Parks are Maintained ...................................................................................................... 2 About the Data Used in this Report ....................................................................................... 3 Data Caveats .......................................................................................................................... 5 Report Column Definitions and Calculations ........................................................................... 5 Tables ...................................................................................................................................... Table 1 – Park-Level Services ............................................................................................ 8 Table 2 – Sector-Level Services ........................................................................................98 Table 3 – Borough and Citywide Work Orders ...................................................................99 Table 4 – Borough and Citywide-Level Services Not Captured in Work
    [Show full text]