China Human Rights Report 2019》

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

China Human Rights Report 2019》 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 本出版品係由財團法人臺灣民主基金會負責出版。臺灣民主基金會是 一個獨立、非營利的機構,其宗旨在促進臺灣以及全球民主、人權的 研究與發展。臺灣民主基金會成立於二○○三年,是亞洲第一個國家 級民主基金會,未來基金會志在與其他民主國家合作,促進全球新一 波的民主化。 This is a publication of the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD). The TFD is an independent, non-profit foundation dedicated to the study and promotion of democracy and human rights in Taiwan and abroad. Founded in 2003, the TFD is the first democracy assistance foundation established in Asia. The Foundation is committed to the vision of working together with other democracies, to advance a new wave of democratization worldwide. 本報告由臺灣民主基金會負責出版,報告內容不代表本會意見。 版權所有,非經本會事先書面同意,不得翻印、轉載及翻譯。 This report has been published by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. Statements of fact or opinion appearing in this report do not imply endorsement by the publisher. All rights reserved. No portion of the contents may be reproduced in any form or by any means without prior written permission of the publisher. 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 臺灣民主基金會 Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 《China Human Rights Report 2019》 Contents Foreword.................................................................................................... i Preface........................................................................................................ 1 The Human Rights Dialogue and Confrontation between China and the World in 2019....................................................................................... 23 Political Human Rights ............................................................................ 51 Human Rights in the Chinese Administration of Justice ....................... 83 Social Human Rights ............................................................................. 115 Economic and Environmental Human Rights ........................................ 145 Religious and Ethnic Minority Human Rights........................................ 177 Gender Human Rights ........................................................................... 215 Taiwan-related Human Rights ................................................................ 251 Scientific and Technological Human Rights........................................... 289 Human Rights in Hong Kong and Macau............................................... 323 Foreword i Foreword The Taiwan Foundation for Democracy has compiled this China Human Rights Report year after year since 2004 under the guidance of the Foundation’s board of trustees and supervisory board as well as scholars in relevant fields. Over the past decade and half, the Foundation has consistently conducted systematic observations on human rights status in China as a routine task. The Foundation publishes this Report as a digest of valuable information primarily for readers – domestic or abroad – to gain insight into human rights situation in China, and also to promote appreciation about the role of democracy in safeguarding human rights. The research team for this annual China Human Rights Report adopts the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) as the yardstick to assess the human rights situation in China through same-calendar-year events as well as multi-year trends. The sources are public domain information such as news reports and research papers. China’s official publications like leaders’ open statements, laws and regulations, policy declarations, and white papers are used to substantiate accounts gleamed from media reports. Since its outset in 2004, the China Human Rights Report has always examined the human rights status in political, judicial, social, economic, environmental aspects as well as that of Taiwan-based businesses operating in China. Over the years, the issue areas have expanded to cover religious and ethnic minority, gender, and digital authoritarianism. A general observation, entitled Human Rights Dialogue and Confrontation between China and the World, was also added to explore the overall shift in human rights discourse and policy in China and the implication to the rest of the world. In 2019, massive protests erupted in Hong Kong against a proposed amendment to the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance. People’s outcry reflected the fast- 2020 by Taiwan Foundation for Democracy ii China Human Rights Report 2019 changing political atmosphere and deteriorating human rights status there. The size of street rallies, the duration of the protests, the intensity of confrontation between the people and police, and the speed at which Hong Kong people’s human rights crumbled were all unprecedented. People have begun to wonder if China is reneging on its commitment of “One Country, Two Systems” granting 50 years’ autonomy to Hong Kong and Macau. We present to you the outcome of our probe in a new chapter in this 2019 edition. The 2019 project team of authors and research assistants worked under the able coordination of Professor Li-wen Tung to meet every other month. At such gatherings, each author made a presentation about her/his assigned chapter topic while staying abreast of the progress of other chapters and relevant human right status. TFD would like to extend the most sincere gratitude and appreciation for all the hard work and dedication provided by the authors and assistants in this yearlong endeavor. This annual reincarnation of the China Human Rights Report has made available a consistent and reliable source of information for those interested in following the development of China’s human rights status. It is our belief that such persistent long- term observations with well-intended impartial critique will not only encourage better understanding of human rights status in China, but also bring about bolstered human rights in China eventually. Ketty W. Chen Acting President Taiwan Foundation for Democracy April 8, 2020 2020 by Taiwan Foundation for Democracy Preface 1 Preface ∗ Li-wen Tung 1 The China Human Rights Report 2019, published by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (TFD), follows the contents laid out in the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, and uses these two covenants as the norms and standards for observing and monitoring human rights in China. This year’s report has ten parts, including chapters on the Human Rights Dialogue and Confrontation between China and the World, Social Human Rights, Political Human Rights, Judicial Human Rights, Economic and Environmental Human Rights, Religious and Ethnic Minority Human Right, Scientific and Technological Human Rights, Gender Human Right, Taiwan- related Human Rights, and Human Rights in Hong Kong and Macau. The focus of this year’s human rights report centers on three dimensions: (1) What is the position and belief of the Chinese government toward the protection of human rights? (2) What specific actions the Chinese government has taken with regard to human rights development? (3) Which particular cases have affected the development of human rights in China? Information and data collection began from January to the end of November 2019. In the process of collecting this information, which consist of published reports from overseas and Chinese official media sources, the report has strived to be objective and balanced. With respect to the overall development of human rights in China, observation reports from all ten fields indicate that 2019 was even worse than 2018, yet the overall conclusion from last year’s report was: “the year can be considered as the worst year ever for human rights in nearly four decades since China began the process of reform and opening up.” Thus, we discover that, in the name of pursuing the Chinese Dream, * Professor, Department of Public Security, Central Police University. E-mail: [email protected]. 2020 by Taiwan Foundation for Democracy 2 China Human Rights Report 2019 the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) knows no bounds when it comes to committing serious human rights violations across various domestic domains. In the international arena, the Chinese government has aggressively stepped up its efforts to tout the “Chinese model” of governance, with the intention of changing and replacing the universal standing of human rights values around the world. The Chinese government has no intention of protecting human rights but is instead committed to rationalizing and legitimizing its human rights abuses. Across each human rights domain, there have not only been many newly enacted policies and regulations that further restrict and infringe on people’s human rights, but many new instances of distressing and shocking human rights abuses have emerged. More serious is the fact that the Chinese regime takes a whole of government approach to manufacture fake news, spreading to the international community the false appearance that human rights have improved in China and that Chinese people follow the government’s leadership. The following sections provide short summaries of this year’s monitoring reports from the different domains: 1. The Human Rights Dialogue and Confrontation between China and the World: Global Divide and a New Cold War over Human Rights China’s purpose for conducting human rights dialogues with the international community is to transform the universal human rights value system of the international community and replace it with the “Chinese model,” but the end result is a global divide and a new cold war over human
Recommended publications
  • Chen Xitong Report on Putting Down Anti
    Recent Publications The June Turbulence in Beijing How Chinese View the Riot in Beijing Fourth Plenary Session of the CPC Central Committee Report on Down Anti-Government Riot Retrospective After the Storm VOA Disgraces Itself Report on Checking the Turmoil and Quelling the Counter-Revolutionary Rebellion June 30, 1989 Chen Xitong, State Councillor and Mayor of Beijing New Star Publishers Beijing 1989 Report on Checking the Turmoil and Quelling the Counter-Revolutionary Rebellion From June 29 to July 7 the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress - the standing organization of the highest organ of state power in the People's Republic of China - held the eighth meeting of the Seventh National People's Congress in Beijing. One of the topics for discussing at the meeting was a report on checking the turmoil and quelling the counter-revolutionary rebellion in Beijirig. The report by state councillor and mayor of Beijing Chen Xitong explained in detail the process by which a small group of people made use of the student unrest in Beijing and turned it into a counter-revolutionary rebellion by mid-June. It gave a detailed account of the nature of the riot, its severe conse- quence and the efforts made by troops enforcing _martial law, with the help of Beijing residents to quell the riot. The report exposed the behind-the-scene activities of people who stub- bornly persisted in opposing the Chinese Communist Party and socialism as well as the small handful of organizers and schemers of the riot; their collaboration with antagonistic forces at home and abroad; and the atrocities committed by former criminals in beating, looting, burning and First Edition 1989 killing in the riot.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 7.3 Mb
    Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Janice Hyeju Jeong 2019 Abstract While China’s recent Belt and the Road Initiative and its expansion across Eurasia is garnering public and scholarly attention, this dissertation recasts the space of Eurasia as one connected through historic Islamic networks between Mecca and China. Specifically, I show that eruptions of
    [Show full text]
  • Standoff at Tiananmen: Recollections of 1989: the Making of Goddess of Democracy
    2019/4/23 Standoff At Tiananmen: Recollections of 1989: The Making of Goddess of Democracy 更多 创建博客 登录 Standoff At Tiananmen How Chinese Students Shocked the World with a Magnificent Movement for Democracy and Liberty that Ended in the Tragic Tiananmen Massacre in 1989. Relive the history with this blog and my book, "Standoff at Tiananmen", a narrative history of the movement. Home Days People Documents Pictures Books Recollections Memorials Monday, May 30, 2011 "Standoff at Tiananmen" English Language Edition Recollections of 1989: The Making of Goddess of Democracy Click on the image to buy at Amazon "Standoff at Tiananmen" Chinese Language Edition On May 30, 1989, the statue Goddess of Democracy was erected at Tiananmen Square and became one of the lasting symbols of the 1989 student movement. The following is a re-telling of the making of that statue, originally published in the book Children of Dragon, by a sculptor named Cao Xinyuan: Nothing excites a sculptor as much as seeing a work of her own creation take shape. But although I was watching the creation of a sculpture that I had had no part in making, I nevertheless felt the same excitement. It was the "Goddess of Democracy" statue that stood for five days in Tiananmen Square. Until last year I was a graduate student at the Central Academy of Fine Arts in Beijing, where the sculpture was made. I was living there when these events took place. 点击图像去Amazon购买 Students and faculty of the Central Academy of Fine Arts, which is located only a short distance from Tiananmen Square, had from the beginning been actively involved in the demonstrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource List
    Resource List rative activities relating to June 4th. The Nomination of the Tiananmen Mothers for Web site contains information about ongo- the Nobel Peace Prize 2004 The 1989 ing and upcoming campaigns and rallies in http://209.120.234.77/64/press/ .2, Democracy Movement Hong Kong and overseas. It also provides TiananmenMothersPackage_2004_Final.pdf NO links to many other relevant Web sites. English COMPILED BY STACY MOSHER This packet of materials was prepared by Independent Federation of Chinese Stu- the Independent Federation of Chinese Stu- dents and Scholars dents and Scholars to support their nomi- WEB SITES: www.ifcss.net nation of the Tiananmen Mothers for the FORUM Chinese and English 2004 Nobel Peace Prize. 64 Memo The IFCSS was founded in Chicago in Princeton Professor Perry Link’s letter of http://www.64memo.org/index.asp August 1989 by more than 1,000 Chinese nomination can be read in Chinese at: RIGHTS Chinese student representatives from more than http://www.dajiyuan.com/gb/4/4/2/n499 Operated by Tiananmen veteran Feng 200 U.S. universities, and remains the 469.htm CHINA Congde and sponsored by HRIC, this Web most influential overseas Chinese student The text was transcribed from Link’s site provides an archive of documents, arti- group. Although less active in recent years, broadcast of the letter on Radio Free Asia. 79 cles and images relating to June 4th. IFCSS is organizing the collection of arti- cles, documents and photos relating to its Tiananmen Square, 1989: The Declassi- Boxun.com Tiananmen Feature upcoming 15th anniversary. fied History http://www.boxun.com/my-cgi/post/ http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/N TURES display_all.cgi?cat=64 June 4th Essays SAEBB16/ FEA Chinese http://www.dajiyuan.com/gb/nf2976.htm English Boxun’s special section of photos, articles Chinese An archive of official documents of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Lived Climate Pollutants Special Edition Research Digest
    SAP/APR2020/01 Prepared by the SAP 15.04.2020 SHORT-LIVED CLIMATE POLLUTANTS SPECIAL EDITION RESEARCH DIGEST Covid-19 and Air Pollution The SAP and the Secretariat have prepared this special edition of the SLCP research digest for the purpose of informing the Climate and Clean Air Coalition partnership of the latest and on-going research and potential links between covid-19 and air pollution and SLCPs. The SAP has not evaluated the content of the publications. All SLCP research digests are available on the CCAC website (http://ccacoalition.org/en/research-digest) The Scientific Advisory Panel of the 1 SAP/APR2020/01 Prepared by the SAP 15.04.2020 Table of Contents CHANGES IN EMISSIONS DUE TO COVID-19 RESPONSE ....................................................................... 8 COVID-19 as a factor influencing air pollution? .......................................................................................... 8 COVID-19, City Lockdown, and Air Pollution Evidence from China .............................................................. 9 Good in The Worst: Covid-19 Restrictions and Ease in Global Air Pollution ................................................. 9 Severe air pollution events not avoided by reduced anthropogenic activities during Covid-19 outbreak .... 9 The Effects of Outdoor Air Pollution Concentrations and Lockdowns on Covid-19 Infections in Wuhan and Other Provincial Capitals in China .............................................................................................................10 Changes in air
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 117Th Congress
    Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues for the 117th Congress March 31, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46750 SUMMARY R46750 Human Rights in China and U.S. Policy: Issues March 31, 2021 for the 117th Congress Thomas Lum U.S. concern over human rights in China has been a central issue in U.S.-China relations, Specialist in Asian Affairs particularly since the Tiananmen crackdown in 1989. In recent years, human rights conditions in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) have deteriorated, while bilateral tensions related to trade Michael A. Weber and security have increased, possibly creating both constraints and opportunities for U.S. policy Analyst in Foreign Affairs on human rights. After consolidating power in 2013, Chinese Communist Party General Secretary and State President Xi Jinping intensified and expanded the reassertion of party control over society that began toward the end of the term of his predecessor, Hu Jintao. Since 2017, the government has enacted new laws that place further restrictions on civil society in the name of national security, authorize greater controls over minority and religious groups, and further constrain the freedoms of PRC citizens. Government methods of social and political control are evolving to include the widespread use of sophisticated surveillance and big data technologies. Arrests of human rights advocates and lawyers intensified in 2015, followed by party efforts to instill ideological conformity across various spheres of society. In 2016, President Xi launched a policy known as “Sinicization,” under which the government has taken additional measures to compel China’s religious practitioners and ethnic minorities to conform to Han Chinese culture, support China’s socialist system as defined by the Communist Party, abide by Communist Party policies, and reduce ethnic differences and foreign influences.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • A Data Compression Algorithm Based on Adaptive Huffman Code for Wireless Sensor Networks
    2011 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA 2011) Shenzhen, China 28 – 29 March 2011 Volume 1 Pages 1-618 IEEE Catalog Number: CFP1188E-PRT ISBN: 978-1-61284-289-9 1/4 2011 Fourth International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation ICICTA 2011 Table of Contents Volume - 1 Preface - Volume 1.....................................................................................................................................................xxv Conference Committees - Volume 1.......................................................................................................................xxvi Reviewers - Volume 1.............................................................................................................................................xxviii Session 1: Advanced Comptation Theory and Applications A Data Compression Algorithm Based on Adaptive Huffman Code for Wireless Sensor Networks .............................................................................................................................................................3 Mo Yuanbin, Qiu Yubing, Liu Jizhong, and Ling Yanxia A Genetic Algorithm for Solving Weak Nonlinear Bilevel Programming Problems ....................................................7 Yulan Xiao and Hecheng Li A Layering Learning Routing Algorithm of WSNs Based on ADS Approach ............................................................10 Wang Zhaoqing and Zhong Sheng A Load Distribution Optimization among
    [Show full text]
  • China: Submission to the United Nations Committee Against Torture
    CHINA SUBMISSION TO THE UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 56TH SESSION, 9 NOVEMBER – 9 DECEMBER 2015 Amnesty International Publications First published in 2015 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2015 Index: ASA 17/2725/2015 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. A CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 DEFINITION OF TORTURE AND CRIMINALIZATION OF ALL ACTS OF TORTURE (ARTICLES 1 & 4, QUESTION 1 OF THE LIST OF ISSUES) ............................................................... 5 TORTURE, OTHER ILL-TREATMENT AND HARASSMENT OF LAWYERS (ARTICLE 2, QUESTION 4 OF THE LIST OF ISSUES) ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • China Reform Monitor No. 1433 | American Foreign Policy Council
    China Reform Monitor No. 1433 September 17, 2020 Joshua Eisenman Related Categories: Democracy and Governance; Human Rights and Humanitarian Issues; International Economics and Trade; China; Australia CHINA'S SEMICONDUCTOR TRADE BOOMS... China is on track to import $300 billion-worth of semiconductors from the U.S. for the third straight year, as its semiconductor developers continue to rely on American-made chip design tools, patents, and critical manufacturing technologies. China bought $184 billion of foreign semiconductors in the first seven months of the year, 12% more than last year. Since May, the Trump administration has cut off China's access to semiconductors, barring shipments of virtually all chips to its largest corporation, Huawei. (Bloomberg, August 26, 2020) ...AS BEIJING LOOKS TO DOMINATE PRODUCTION A series of research, education and financing initiatives aimed at building China's 3rd generation semiconductor industry for the next five years have been added to the 14th 5-year plan, and will be reviewed next month. Third-generation semiconductors are chipsets made of special materials that can operate at high frequency and in higher power and temperature environments. They are used in 5th generation radio frequency chips, military-grade radars and electric vehicles. Since no single country now dominates third-generation chip technology, China is gambling that its corporations will become dominant if they get in now. Tsinghua Unigroup is building a $22 billion memory chip plant in Wuhan, while Huawei's HiSilicon is designing processors for most of its high-end devices. "This is a sector about to see explosive growth," says Alan Zhou, managing partner of Fujian-based chip investment fund An Xin Capital Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional-Executive Commission on China Annual Report 2019
    CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ANNUAL REPORT 2019 ONE HUNDRED SIXTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 18, 2019 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: https://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 36–743 PDF WASHINGTON : 2019 VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate JAMES P. MCGOVERN, Massachusetts, MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Co-chair Chair JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio TOM COTTON, Arkansas THOMAS SUOZZI, New York STEVE DAINES, Montana TOM MALINOWSKI, New Jersey TODD YOUNG, Indiana BEN MCADAMS, Utah DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California CHRISTOPHER SMITH, New Jersey JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon BRIAN MAST, Florida GARY PETERS, Michigan VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS Department of State, To Be Appointed Department of Labor, To Be Appointed Department of Commerce, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed At-Large, To Be Appointed JONATHAN STIVERS, Staff Director PETER MATTIS, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 13:38 Nov 18, 2019 Jkt 036743 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 G:\ANNUAL REPORT\ANNUAL REPORT 2019\2019 AR GPO FILES\FRONTMATTER.TXT C O N T E N T S Page I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Government's Response to the Pandemic: Measures
    healthcare Article The Chinese Government’s Response to the Pandemic: Measures, Dynamic Changes, and Main Patterns Yuxi He 1, Maorui Li 1, Qixi Zhong 2, Qi Li 1, Ruishi Yang 1, Jing Lin 1 and Xiaojun Zhang 1,3,* 1 School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China; [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (Q.L.); [email protected] (R.Y.); [email protected] (J.L.) 2 School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China; [email protected] 3 Fujian Emergency Management Research Center, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: (1) Background: The governance measures that governments deploy vary substantially across countries and even within countries; there is, however, limited knowledge of the responses of local governments or from different areas in the same country. (2) Methods: By using grounded theory and an automatic text processing method, this study analyses the pandemic governance measures, the pandemic governance pattern, and possible factors across 28 provinces in mainland China based on the text of 28 official provincial government Sina microblogs dating from 20 January to 1 July 2020. (3) Results and discussion: The provincial pandemic governance patterns in China are divided into a pathogen-control pattern, a diagnosis and treatment consolidation pattern, a balanced promotion pattern, a quick-adjustment response pattern, and a recovery-oriented pattern. The pandemic severity, economic development, public health service, and population structure may Citation: He, Y.; Li, M.; Zhong, Q.; Li, all have an impact on pandemic governance measures.
    [Show full text]