DOCSLIB.ORG

Current Political Issues Macedonia September 2004 ZA4324

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Current Political Issues Macedonia September 2004 ZA4324 ZA-Archiv Nummer 4324 Current Political Issues Macedonia September 2004 ZA4324 POLL - September 2004 (1) Are you satisfied with the work of the Government? 1. very much satisfied 2. some what satisfied 3. some what unsatisfied 4. very much unsatisfied 5. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 6. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) (2) If Parliamentary elections were held next week, which party would you vote for? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1.Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia 2. VMRO-DPMNE 3. Liberal Democratic Party 4. Liberal Party 5. Democratic Union for Integration 6. The third way 7. VMRO-Peoples party 8. Democratic Party of Albanians 9. Party for Democratic Prosperity 10. other 11. no one 12. do not know 13. no answer (3) Which politician do you trust the most? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1. Hari Kostov 2. Vlado Buchkovski 3. Nikola Gruevski 4. Stojan Andov 5. Radmila Shekerinska 6. Sashko Kedev 7. Ljubcho Georgievski 8. Trifun Kostovski 9. Vasil Tupurkovski 10. Tito Petkovski 11. Nikola Popovski 12. Risto Penov 13. Ljubisav Ivanov-Zingo 14. Arben Xaferi 15. Ali Ahmeti 16. Rufi Osmani 17. Abdulafman Bexeti 18. Branko Crvenkovski 19. Ganka Samoilova Cvetanovska 20. Dosta Dimovska 21. Marijan Cjorchev 22. Ilinka Mitreva 23. Stevcho Jakimovski 24. Ljupcho Jordanovski 25. Pavle Trajanov 26. other (WRITE WHO) 27. no one 28. do not know 29. no answer 1 ZA4324 (4) Which of the following do you see as a Mayor of Skopje? 1. Risto Penov 2. Ganka Samoilova Cvetanovska 3. Stevche Jakimovski 4. Trifun Kostovski 5. Zoran Krstevski 6. Ljupcho Nikolovski Fufo 7. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 8. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) 2 ZA4324 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENT (5) Gender 1. male 2. female (6) Age 1. up to 29 2. from 30 to 39 3. from 40 to 49 4. from 50 to 59 5. over 60 (7) Education 1. unfinished primary 2. primary 3. secondary 4. vocational 5. college (8) Occupation 1. student 7. retired, working occasionally 2. low-skilled worker 8. retired 3. public administration 9. house chores 4. agriculture 10. unemployed 5. private sector - self-employed 11. other 6. private business with employees 12. high-skilled worker (9) Ethnic belonging 1. Macedonian 5. Roma 2. Albanian 6. Vlach 3. Turkish 7. Bosnian 4. Serbian 8. other (10) Place of living 1. village (All rural areas, including ones around Skopje) 2. smaller town (Demir Hisar, Krushevo, Struga, Kichevo, Resen, Kavadarci, Negotino, Gevgelija, Kratovo, Kriva Palanka, Sveti Nikole, Kochani, Vinica, Berovo, Pehchevo, Radovish and Valandovo) 3. bigger town (Bitola, Prilep, Ohrid, Tetovo, Gostivar, Veles, Kumanovo, Shtip and Strumica) 4. Skopje (11) Region: 1. SKOPJE 2. PELAGONIA 3. OHRID 4. POLOG 5. POVARDARIE 6. KUMANOVO 7. BREGALNICA 3 ZA4324 I will now ask you few questions concerning the upcoming decentralization referendum (12) Will you vote on the referendum about the upcoming decentralization? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 4. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) (13) How will the referendum influence our relations with NATO and EU? 1. negative 2. positive 3. no influence 4. do not know/no answer (14) How will the referendum influence the implementation of the Ohrid Framework Agreement? 1. negative 2. positive 3. no influence 4. do not know/no answer (15) With which of the following statements about the referendum do you agree 1. it is a state and national issue 2. it is a tool of the oposition to come to power 3. do not know 4. no answer (16) Do you think that the referendum will be successful? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 4. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) (17) If it is unsuccessfull, are you willing to protest? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know (DO NOT READ OUT) 4. no answer (DO NOT READ OUT) (18)Which actors made the biggest contribution to promote the referendum? 1. World Macedonian Congres 2. The third way 3. Liberal Party 4. VMRO-DPMNE 5. Trifun Kostovski 6. other 7. do not know 8. no answer 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Die Makedonische Frage Von
    Geschichte und Politik / Südosteuropa Die makedonische Frage von Andreas Schwarz Stand: 06.08.2020 1 Inhaltsverzeichnis 0 Vorwort....................................................................................................................11 1 Einleitung – Das antike und das heutige Makedonien........................................14 1.1 Das antike Makedonien und die antiken Makedonier.....................................................14 1.2 Das heutige Makedonien....................................................................................................15 1.3 Die heutigen Makedonier...................................................................................................16 1.4 Die ethnischen bzw. slawischen Makedonier....................................................................16 1.5 Die Sprache der ethnischen bzw. slawischen Makedonier..............................................17 1.6 Die griechischen Makedonier.............................................................................................17 1.7 Fazit………………………………......................................................................................17 2 Der Frieden von San Stefano und Makedonien...................................................18 2.1 Hintergrund – Die Balkankrise........................................................................................18 2.2 Der Frieden von San Stefano............................................................................................18 2.3 Auszüge aus dem Friedensvertrag von San Stefano......................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • MACEDONIA UPDATE: Challenges and Choices for the New Government
    MACEDONIA UPDATE: Challenges and Choices for the New Government ICG Balkans Report N°60 Skopje-Brussels, 29 March 1999 Foreword This latest ICG report on Macedonia was written during March, as the new humanitarian catastrophe in neighbouring Kosovo unfolded and reached a new scale. Because of the recent events in Kosovo and the region at large, parts of this report have been overtaken by new developments. In particular, this concerns issues relating to the amount of aid reaching Macedonia, actions taken to alleviate the refugee situation in Macedonia and, most importantly, the Government’s ability to deal with the increasing number of refugees. Indeed, events in the last few days may well have reached a point beyond the Government’s capacity to respond. On the whole however, the analysis and conclusions of this report are still valid and still merit consideration despite the fact that local and international attention is now focusing on developments in Kosovo and their effect on neighbouring countries. Skopje–Brussels, 6th April, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 1 II. THE GOVERNMENT’S FIRST 100 DAYS IN OFFICE — ..................................... A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT........................................................................ 1 III. TOO MANY PROMISES, TOO LITTLE TIME .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Current Political Issues Macedonia May 2005 ZA4327
    ZA-Archiv Nummer 4327 Current Political Issues Macedonia May 2005 ZA4327 POLL - May 2005 1. Would you support a decision to make a compromise with the name of the Republic of Macedonia if that would speed up EU integration? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know 4. no answer 2. Should the electric power company be privatised? 1. yes 2. no 3. do not know 4. no answer 3. Which politicians do you trust the most? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1. no one 2. do not know 3. no answer 4. Hari Kostov 5. Vlado Buchkovski 6. Nikola Gruevski 7. Arben Xaferi 8. Ali Ahmeti 9. Radmila Shekerinska 10. Tito Petkovski 11. Nikola Popovski 12. Stevcho Jakimovski 13. Branko Crvenkovski 14. Trifun Kostovski 15. Vasil Tupurkovski 16. Abdulafman Bexeti 17. Rufi Osmani 18. Sashko Kedev 19. Stojan Andov 20. Risto Penov 21. Ljubisav Ivanov-Zingo 22. Ganka Samoilova Cvetanovska 23. Ilinka Mitreva 24. Dosta Dimovska 25. Marijan Gjorchev 26. Ljubcho Georgievski 27. Ljupcho Jordanovski 28. Pavle Trajanov 1 ZA4327 4. If Parliamentary elections were held next week, which party would you vote for? (DO NOT READ OUT OPTIONS) 1.Social-Democratic Union of Macedonia 2. VMRO-DPMNE 3. Liberal Democratic Party 4. Liberal Party 5. Democratic Union for Integration 6. The third way 7. VMRO-Peoples party 8. Democratic Party of Albanians 9. Party for Democratic Prosperity 10. Democratic Alternative 11. other 12. no one 13. do not know 14. no answer 2 ZA4327 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENT 5. Gender 1. male 2. female 6. Age 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia' (Fyrom)
    FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF 'MACEDONIA' (FYROM) COUNTRY ASSESSMENT APRIL 2003 COUNTRY INFORMATION & POLICY UNIT IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Macedonia (FYROM) April 2003 CONTENTS 1 SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.4 2 GEOGRAPHY 2.1 – 2.5 3 ECONOMY 3.1 – 3.2 4 HISTORY 4.1 – 4.4 5 STATE STRUCTURES The Constitution 5.1 – 5.2 Political System 5.3 – 5.10 Judiciary 5.11 – 5.16 Military 5.17 Internal Security 5.18 – 5.21 Legal Rights/Detention 5.22 – 5.23 Prisons 5.24 – 5.27 Medical Services 5.28 – 5.31 Psychosocial Services 5.32 – 5.33 Persons with Disabilities 5.34 Education System 5.35 – 5.38 6 Human Rights 6.A Human Rights Issues Overview 6.1 – 6.6 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.7 – 6.12 Journalists 6.13 – 6.15 Freedom of Religion 6.16 – 6.20 Religious Groups 6.21 – 6.22 Freedom of Assembly and Association 6.23 – 6.25 Employment Rights 6.26 – 6.28 Trade Unions and the right to strike 6.29 – 6.31 People Trafficking 6.32 – 6.37 Freedom of Movement 6.38 – 6.41 6.B Human Rights - Specific Groups Ethnic Groups 6.42 – 6.44 Albanians 6.45 – 6.51 Turks 6.52 – 6.53 Roma 6.54 – 6.56 Serbs 6.57 Muslim Macedonians 6.58 Other Minorities 6.59 Women 6.60 – 6.63 Children 6.64 – 6.67 Homosexuals 6.68 – 6.69 Political Activists 6.70 Human Rights Activists 6.71 Macedonia (FYROM) April 2003 6.C Human Rights - Other Issues Internally Displaced Persons 6.72 – 6.73 Annexes Chronology of major events Annex A Political Organisations Annex B Prominent People Annex C Reference to Source Material Annex D Macedonia (FYROM) April 2003 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Yugoslav Macedonia - the Shades of Night?
    Conflict Studies Research Centre G98 Former Yugoslav Macedonia - The Shades Of Night? James Pettifer This paper examines the recent historical background to the crisis in former Yugoslav Macedonia, the role of the UNPREDEP force 1993 - 1999 and consider how far post-communist institutional reform has taken place. It outlines the structural crisis in the government and society and inter-ethnic relations and analyses the position and motivations of the main military and political actors. Contents Introduction 2 Historical Background 2 Macedonian History Since 1991 6 - The Fourth Phase of the Macedonia Question Defence & Security Implications Post-1991 7 The Deployment of UNPREDEP 8 The Seeds of the Current Conflict 10 Events since March 2001 11 Effect of the Rebellion on Internal FYROM 13 Albanian Political Life Effects of the Rebellion on Internal Slav-Macedonian 14 Political Life Options for the IC 16 1 Former Yugoslav Macedonia - The Shades of Night? Conflict Studies Research Centre ISBN 1-903584-36-1 July 2001 G98 James Pettifer Introduction Among all the Republics of the second Yugoslavia, FYROM was generally praised by the international community for many years as an example of a fairly successful multiethnic and multicultural state that managed its exit from socialist Yugoslavia without significant violence. It seemed to be a beacon of hope in a difficult region. The Yugoslav Federal Army left the Socialist Republic of Macedonia by voluntary agreement, peacefully, although virtually all equipment was also removed, leaving the new state without any defence force. Under its elderly President, Kiro Gligorov, FYROM had achieved independence in a national referendum from FRY by a large majority in September 1991, and was able to survive the difficult period of the Greek economic boycott that followed and also the serious pressures resulting from United Nations economic sanctions in the 1993 to 1995 period against FRY.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia' (Fyrom)
    FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF 'MACEDONIA' (FYROM) COUNTRY ASSESSMENT APRIL 2003 COUNTRY INFORMATION & POLICY UNIT IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY DIRECTORATE HOME OFFICE, UNITED KINGDOM Macedonia (FYROM) April 2003 CONTENTS 1 SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 - 1.4 2 GEOGRAPHY 2.1 – 2.5 3 ECONOMY 3.1 – 3.2 4 HISTORY 4.1 – 4.4 5 STATE STRUCTURES The Constitution 5.1 – 5.2 Political System 5.3 – 5.10 Judiciary 5.11 – 5.16 Military 5.17 Internal Security 5.18 – 5.21 Legal Rights/Detention 5.22 – 5.23 Prisons 5.24 – 5.27 Medical Services 5.28 – 5.31 Psychosocial Services 5.32 – 5.33 Persons with Disabilities 5.34 Education System 5.35 – 5.38 6 Human Rights 6.A Human Rights Issues Overview 6.1 – 6.6 Freedom of Speech and the Media 6.7 – 6.12 Journalists 6.13 – 6.15 Freedom of Religion 6.16 – 6.20 Religious Groups 6.21 – 6.22 Freedom of Assembly and Association 6.23 – 6.25 Employment Rights 6.26 – 6.28 Trade Unions and the right to strike 6.29 – 6.31 People Trafficking 6.32 – 6.37 Freedom of Movement 6.38 – 6.41 6.B Human Rights - Specific Groups Ethnic Groups 6.42 – 6.44 Albanians 6.45 – 6.51 Turks 6.52 – 6.53 Roma 6.54 – 6.56 Serbs 6.57 Muslim Macedonians 6.58 Other Minorities 6.59 Women 6.60 – 6.63 Children 6.64 – 6.67 Homosexuals 6.68 – 6.69 Political Activists 6.70 Human Rights Activists 6.71 Macedonia (FYROM) April 2003 6.C Human Rights - Other Issues Internally Displaced Persons 6.72 – 6.73 Annexes Chronology of major events Annex A Political Organisations Annex B Prominent People Annex C Reference to Source Material Annex D Macedonia (FYROM) April 2003 1.
    [Show full text]
  • BAROMETER Political and Parties Development in the Republic Of
    Institute for Sociological, Political and Juridical Research Issue N.10 June 2004 BAROMETER Political and Parties Development in the Republic of Macedonia Dr. Natasha Gaber-Damjanovska Dr. Aneta Jovevska In cooperation with the Friedrich Ebert Foundation Regional Office Macedonia C O N T E N T S 1. Last Change of "Concordia" Command 2. Former Conflict Consequences 3. Decentralization Process 4. EU and NATO Integration Processes 5. Legal and Parliamentary Activities 6. Education Issues 7. Economic Developments 8. Unpredicted Events Followed by Presidential Elections 9. Presidential Elections-Campaign 10. Elections- First Round 11. Elections- Second Round 12. Turbulence in VMRO-DPMNE 13. Religious Issues 14. Public Opinion Polls 2 Last Change of "Concordia" Command At the end of 2003 officially ceased to exist "Concordia", the EU military mission in Macedonia, which was replaced by the civilian police mission "Proxima". On the occasion spoke Mr. Solana who pointed out that "the main threat for the country's stability is crime, and not the armed conflict anymore, which stresses that the support must be a police one and not military". His estimation was that "the process of stabilization and normalization has reached the point in which the country is in a position to say goodbye to foreign troops". Prime Minister Crvenkovski described Macedonia as a "completely stabilized country in the security sense", whose main priority presently is the economic development and solving social problems. Former Conflict Consequences Repeated disarmament campaign summarized its results at the end of 2003 by informing the public that in the frames of the action for illegal weapon's collection citizens gave 7571 pieces of weapons, 100.000 pieces of ammunition, 1257 pieces and 165 kilograms of explosive, 1001 pieces of accompanying weaponry and 497 meters of wick and cables.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Book
    Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States Boduszyński, Mieczysław P. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Boduszyński, Mieczysław P. Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States: Divergent Paths toward a New Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.473. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/473 [ Access provided at 25 Sep 2021 03:15 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States Democratic Transition and Consolidation Jorge I. Domínguez and Anthony Jones, Series Editors Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States Divergent Paths toward a New Europe Mieczysław P. Boduszyn´ski The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore © 2010 The Johns Hopkins University Press All rights reserved. Published 2010 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Boduszyn´ski, Mieczysław P., 1974– Regime change in the Yugoslav successor states : divergent paths toward a new Europe / Mieczysław P. Boduszyn´ski. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8018-9429-9 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8018-9429-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Regime change—Former Yugoslav republics. 2. Self-determination, National—Former Yugoslav republics. 3. Post-communism—Former Yugoslav republics. 4. Democracy—Former Yugoslav republics. 5. Former Yugoslav republics—Politics and government.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe Report, Nr. 51: Macedonia
    MACEDONIA: “NEW FACES IN SKOPJE” Lessons from the Macedonian elections and the challenges facing the new government ICG Balkans Report N°51 Skopje-Brussels, 08 January 1999 Table of Contents A. Macedonians vote for change................................................................................ 1 1. The New Parliament .......................................................................................... 1 (i) Election Results.............................................................................................. 1 (ii) Complaints and Irregularities.......................................................................... 3 (iii) Technical and administrative issues to be addressed ahead of future elections ....................................................................................... 4 (iv) Media issues............................................................................................... 5 2. The new electoral system — a weak compromise ............................................. 6 (i) Possible Improvements to the Election System.............................................. 7 (ii) Gerrymandering, or Just Lack of Time? ......................................................... 8 B. The new government — “Radicals” or “Moderates” at the helm?........................... 9 1. New coalition partners tone down nationalist rhetoric…................................... 10 2. …but doubts remain over the coalition’s viability.............................................. 12 C. The new government’s main tasks .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia's Post-Yugoslav Reality
    11 Macedonia’s Post-Yugoslav Reality Corruption, Wire-Tapping, and Stolen Elections Sabrina P. Ramet1 How successful or unsuccessful has Macedonia been since its declaration of independence in 1991? The question sounds simple enough. At first glance, one is inclined to say that it has been unusually unsuccessful, even by Balkan standards. The country has been blocked by Greece in its quest to join the European Union (EU) and NATO, was forced – again by Greece – to change its flag and modify its constitution to renounce territorial aspirations it never nurtured, and was admitted to the United Nations only under the humiliating name Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia – a designation which suggests to Macedonians that their state is a kind of pariah. Then there is the fact that 30.4 per cent of its people were living below the poverty line in 2011 (see the Introduction to this volume). Again, as noted in the Introduction, Macedonia’s ranking on press freedom in 2015 was the lowest among the seven Yugoslav successor states. And finally, there is the extent of corruption through which the ruling party has maintained itself in power since 2006 (detailed below in the subsection Allegations of Abuse of Power and in the section Political Transformation II below). 1 Except where otherwise noted, all internet sources cited herein were accessed during the period 4–7 November 2014. 1 On the other hand, Macedonia was successful in staying out of the War of Yugoslav Succession (1991–95) as well as the 1999 War for Kosovo, avoided being carved up between Greece and Serbia in 1992,2 and has been relatively successful in boosting revenue from tourism, earning 110 million euros from that sector in 2013.3 In addition, in 2001, an Albanian insurgency was successfully resolved with the signing of the Ohrid Peace Accords (discussed below).
    [Show full text]
  • D20242 25 July 2008 MB
    Created on 30 May 2008 PUBLIC # Exhibit Exhibit Confid Description of Exhibit Date Date Witness Tendered Reused testimony Witness Additional Details 65 ter Number Status ential Tendered Admitted Tendered by Counsel Name and Date Number Through 1 1D00001 EXH No Photograph of Witness Elmaz 08-May-07 08-May-07 Jusufov, Edina Taken from EXH P00002 Jusufov's yard, marked by the Elmaz Residovic Witness 2 1D00002 EXH No Photograph of Witness Elmaz 08-May-07 08-May-07 Jusufov, Edina By 2D with Witness Frans Taken from EXH P00012 Jusufov's burned car, marked by Elmaz Residovic Josef HUTSCH on 17-10- the Witness 2007 3 1D00003 EXH No Photograph of Witness Elmaz 08-May-07 08-May-07 Jusufov, Edina By OTP with Witness Elmaz Taken from OTP 65ter Jusufov's house, marked by the Elmaz Residovic JUSUFOV on 09-May-2007 00170, page 5 i.e. N000- Witness 7854 4 1D00004 EXH No Photograph of Witness Elmaz 09-May-07 09-May-07 Jusufov, Edina By 1D with Witness Zlatko Taken from Prosecution Jusufov's son's dead body Elmaz Residovic JACOVSKI on 20-06-2007 65ter 608, page 7 ERN By 1D, with Witness M-171 0501-6265 on 12-07-2007 5 1D00005 EXH No Minutes of Performed Exhumation 15-May-07 20-Jun-07 M-037, BOS Edina By 1D with Witness Sofija Cross-reference: EXH and Autopsy in village Ljuboten, IT-04-82 Residovic GALEVA-PETROVSKA on 31- P00049 dated 09-05-2002 01-08 By 1D with Witness Zlatko JACOVSKI on 20-06-2007 6 1D00006 EXH No Official Note from the 15-May-07 15-May-07 M-037, BOS Edina By 1D with Witness Blagoja 150 investigative department of the IT-04-82 Residovic
    [Show full text]
  • 1998 Elections in Macedonia
    1998 ELECTIONS IN MACEDONIA ICG Balkans Report N°45 Skopje - Sarajevo, 09 October 1998 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................ I I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1 II. EARLIER ELECTORAL EXPERIENCE ............................................................................ 1 III. THE ELECTORAL FRAMEWORK................................................................................... 4 A. ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES........................................................................... 4 B. ADMINISTRATION OF THE ELECTIONS ..................... 5 C. DRAWING BOUNDARIES BETWEEN ELECTORAL DISTRICTS................................................. 6 D. VOTER REGISTRATION AND IDENTIFICATION CARD ............................................................ 6 E. MEDIA REGULATION ........................................................................................................ 7 F. DOMESTIC OBSERVERS................................................................................................... 8 IV. INTERNATIONAL INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................. 8 V. POLITICAL PARTIES AND PRE-ELECTION COALITIONS ............................................ 9 A. VMRO-DPMNE AND DA: UNION FOR CHANGES ............................................................ 11 B. SDS: VICTORY FOR MACEDONIA...................................................................................
    [Show full text]