Spatially Distributed Groundwater Recharge Estimated Using a Water-Budget Model for the Island of Maui, Hawai‘I, 1978–2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spatially Distributed Groundwater Recharge Estimated Using a Water-Budget Model for the Island of Maui, Hawai‘I, 1978–2007 Prepared in cooperation with the County of Maui Department of Water Supply and the State of Hawai‘i Commission on Water Resource Management Spatially Distributed Groundwater Recharge Estimated Using a Water-Budget Model for the Island of Maui, Hawai‘i, 1978–2007 Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5168 Version 2.0, February 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER Top left: View toward summit of West Maui Mountain from a forested ridge near Honokōhau Valley on northern West Maui Mountain, Island of Maui, Hawai‘i. Photograph by Sarah N. Rosa, U.S. Geological Survey, 2013. Top center: View of Waihe‘e River on northeastern West Maui Mountain, Island of Maui, Hawai‘i, 2009. Top right: View of Ke‘anae Valley, on eastern Haleakalā, Island of Maui, Hawai‘i. Photograph by Adam G. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey, 2014. Top right inset: Taro fields near Ke‘anae, eastern coast of Haleakalā, Island of Maui, Hawai‘i. Photograph by Adam G. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey, 2014. Bottom right: View toward southern flank of Haleakalā from the coastline near Kaupō, Island of Maui, Hawai‘i. Photograph byAdam G. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey, 2013. Bottom left: View of shrubs, grass, and barren rock on a steep valley wall near Ukumehame Gulch on southern West Maui Mountain, Island of Maui, Hawai‘i. Photograph by Adam G. Johnson, U.S. Geological Survey, 2010. Center: Map of the Island of Maui, Hawai‘i, showing the relative distribution of estimated mean annual recharge for average climate conditions. Estimated recharge is shown using a spectral color scale with red representing very low recharge and dark blue representing very high recharge. Spatially Distributed Groundwater Recharge Estimated Using a Water-Budget Model for the Island of Maui, Hawai‘i, 1978–2007 By Adam G. Johnson, John A. Engott, Maoya Bassiouni, and Kolja Rotzoll Prepared in cooperation with the County of Maui Department of Water Supply and the State of Hawai‘i Commission on Water Resource Management Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5168 Version 2.0, February 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Deputy Director exercising the authority of the Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 First release: 2014, online Revised: February 2018 (ver. 2.0), online For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Johnson, A.G., Engott, J.A., Bassiouni, Maoya, and Rotzoll, Kolja, 2018, Spatially distributed groundwater recharge estimated using a water-budget model for the Island of Maui, Hawai`i, 1978–2007 (ver. 2.0, February 2018): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5168, 53 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20145168. ISSN 2328-0328 (online) iii Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................1 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................4 Previous Studies ..................................................................................................................................4 Description of Maui ......................................................................................................................................4 Physical Setting ...................................................................................................................................4 Climate ................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrogeology .......................................................................................................................................5 Surface Water ......................................................................................................................................7 Soils ................................................................................................................................................7 Land Cover ..........................................................................................................................................7 Water-Budget Model .....................................................................................................................................7 Conceptual Model .............................................................................................................................10 Model Calculations ...........................................................................................................................10 Model Input .................................................................................................................................................14 Land Cover ........................................................................................................................................14 Impervious Surfaces .................................................................................................................15 Rainfall ..............................................................................................................................................15 Monthly Rainfall ........................................................................................................................15 Daily Rainfall .............................................................................................................................15 Fog Interception .................................................................................................................................16 Irrigation .............................................................................................................................................17 Irrigation Estimates ...................................................................................................................17 Irrigation Calibrations ................................................................................................................18 Septic-System Leaching ....................................................................................................................18 Storm-Drain Systems .........................................................................................................................18 Direct Runoff ......................................................................................................................................19 Computation of Seasonal Runoff-to-Rainfall Ratios..................................................................19 Runoff-to-Rainfall Ratios Assigned to Ungaged Catchment Zones .........................................24 Runoff-to-Rainfall Ratios Assigned to Gaged Basins within a Single Catchment Zone ............25 Runoff-to-Rainfall Ratios Assigned to Gaged Basins with Multiple Catchment Zones..............25 Evapotranspiration .............................................................................................................................25 Forest-Canopy Evaporation and Net Precipitation ....................................................................26 Potential Evapotranspiration .....................................................................................................27 Reference Evapotranspiration .........................................................................................27 Crop Coefficients .............................................................................................................27 Moisture-Storage Capacity of the Plant-Root Zone ..........................................................................30 Direct Recharge .................................................................................................................................30 Other Input .........................................................................................................................................30 Model Exclusions and Limitations ..............................................................................................................32 Model Randomness ....................................................................................................................................33 Water-Budget and Groundwater-Recharge Estimates ...............................................................................33 iv Water-Budget and Recharge Estimates for Average Climate Conditions ..........................................33 Comparison with Water Resources Protection Plan .................................................................42
Recommended publications
  • How Do Atmospheres Change Over Time? the Greenhouse Effect
    Activity #5 How Do Atmospheres Change Over Time? The Greenhouse Effect [Adult] Adapted from: Global Warming & The Greenhouse Effect, Great Explorations in Math and Science (GEMS) Lawrence Hall of Science, 1997, by the Regents of the University of California ISBN: 0-912511-75-3. Unless otherwise noted, all images are courtesy of SETI Institute. 1. Introduction In this activity, Cadettes will observe how the greenhouse effect can change an atmosphere on Mars or on Earth. They will “Think like a scientist. Be a scientist!” 2. Science Objectives You will: • construct models to test ideas about processes that cannot be directly studied on Earth or Mars; • appreciate that the atmosphere is a large and complex system, so experiments concerning it are difficult to perform; and • use skills you have learned about atmospheric composition and apply that knowledge to new situations. 3. Materials For each group of 4–6 Cadettes. • [2] 2 liter (0.5 gal) clear soda bottles with labels removed and tops cut off. These are the Atmosphere Model Chambers. Advance preparation required (see page 2). • [1] pair of scissors for constructing a set of Atmosphere Model Chambers • [1] black permanent marker for constructing a set of Atmosphere Model Chambers • [2] identical thermometers, one for each chamber; view on Amazon.com: http://tinyurl.com/lkrvzvq • sufficient cardboard to prepare backing for each thermometer • 5–10 cm (about 4 in) of clear tape to attach thermometers to cardboard and to inside of each chamber • [1] piece of plastic wrap approximately 15 cm x 15 cm (6 x 6 in) • [1] rubber band large enough to fit the circumference of chamber and secure plastic wrap • chart of electromagnetic spectrum of light (EMS); print in advance • 250-watt infrared heat lamp (bulb) in a fixture with hood.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Hawaii Meet Its Renewable Fuel Target? Case Study of Banagrass-Based Cellulosic Ethanol
    International Journal of Geo-Information Article Can Hawaii Meet Its Renewable Fuel Target? Case Study of Banagrass-Based Cellulosic Ethanol Chinh Tran * and John Yanagida Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1910 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-808-956-4065 Academic Editors: Shih-Lung Shaw, Qingquan Li, Yang Yue and Wolfgang Kainz Received: 9 March 2016; Accepted: 8 August 2016; Published: 16 August 2016 Abstract: Banagrass is a biomass crop candidate for ethanol production in the State of Hawaii. This study examines: (i) whether enough banagrass can be produced to meet Hawaii’s renewable fuel target of 20% highway fuel demand produced with renewable sources by 2020 and (ii) at what cost. This study proposes to locate suitable land areas for banagrass production and ethanol processing, focusing on the two largest islands in the state of Hawaii—Hawaii and Maui. The results suggest that the 20% target is not achievable by using all suitable land resources for banagrass production on both Hawaii and Maui. A total of about 74,224,160 gallons, accounting for 16.04% of the state’s highway fuel demand, can be potentially produced at a cost of $6.28/gallon. Lower ethanol cost is found when using a smaller production scale. The lowest cost of $3.31/gallon is found at a production processing capacity of about 9 million gallons per year (MGY), which meets about 2% of state demand. This cost is still higher than the average imported ethanol price of $3/gallon.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Plants in Your Backyard!
    Invasive Plants In Your Backyard! A Guide to Their Identification and Control new expanded edition Do you know what plants are growing in your yard? Chances are very good that along with your favorite flowers and shrubs, there are non‐native invasives on your property. Non‐native invasives are aggressive exotic plants introduced intentionally for their ornamental value, or accidentally by hitchhiking with people or products. They thrive in our growing conditions, and with no natural enemies have nothing to check their rapid spread. The environmental costs of invasives are great – they crowd out native vegetation and reduce biological diversity, can change how entire ecosystems function, and pose a threat Invasive Morrow’s honeysuckle (S. Leicht, to endangered species. University of Connecticut, bugwood.org) Several organizations in Connecticut are hard at work preventing the spread of invasives, including the Invasive Plant Council, the Invasive Plant Working Group, and the Invasive Plant Atlas of New England. They maintain an official list of invasive and potentially invasive plants, promote invasives eradication, and have helped establish legislation restricting the sale of invasives. Should I be concerned about invasives on my property? Invasive plants can be a major nuisance right in your own backyard. They can kill your favorite trees, show up in your gardens, and overrun your lawn. And, because it can be costly to remove them, they can even lower the value of your property. What’s more, invasive plants can escape to nearby parks, open spaces and natural areas. What should I do if there are invasives on my property? If you find invasive plants on your property they should be removed before the infestation worsens.
    [Show full text]
  • West Lake Woven Wood Shade Section
    West Lake Woven Wood Shade Section Effective April 15, 2014 Save a life: "Install Safety Tension Devices!" Woven Wood Measuring Instructions Measuring Inside Mount (IB) Shades: Measure the exact width (A) and length (B) of the window opening as shown. The factory will deduct ½” overall from the window width for clearance. On all inside mount shades, a small light gap will be visible. Measuring Outside Mount (OB) Shades: Measure the exact width (A) and length (B) of the window opening you wish to cover. The shade should cover the window opening by at least 2” on both the width and length. To cover a window sill, provide a measurement (C) beyond the sill. Outside Mount Inside Mount Measuring Arch Top Valances for Woven Wood Shades: For inside mount shades, measure the exact width and tallest length inside the window opening. For outside mount shades, measure the desired width and tallest length. Make sure to measure the length of outside mount shades at its tallest point. Arch Top woven wood shades must be perfect arches where the length equals ½ the width. For arch top valances, measure dimensions A, X, & Y. For pricing, use the width and tallest length measurement. Make sure to add the arch top shade surcharge. Measuring Angled Shades: It is critical to measure all four sides of the window opening. For inside mount shades, measure the inside of the window opening and for outside mount shades, add the desired overlap. Measure the slope angle with a protractor and provide the angle in degrees. Indicate all measurements on a template to be sent to the factory.
    [Show full text]
  • 8040 Introduction to Natural Resources and Ecology Systems
    Introduction to Natural Resources and Ecology Systems 8040/36 weeks Table of Contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Course Description ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Task Essentials Table .................................................................................................................................... 2 Curriculum Framework ................................................................................................................................. 6 Exploring Leadership Skills through FFA ................................................................................................... 6 Exploring Leadership Opportunities through FFA ....................................................................................... 7 Understanding Natural Resource Management ............................................................................................ 9 Protecting the Environment ........................................................................................................................ 15 Managing Forest Resources ........................................................................................................................ 25 Managing Wildlife Resources ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Inventory
    Natural Resources Inventory Columbia Metropolitan Planning Area Review Draft (10-1-10) NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY Review Draft (10-1-10) City of Columbia, Missouri October 1, 2010 - Blank - Preface for Review Document The NRI area covers the Metropolitan Planning Area defined by the Columbia Area Transportation Study Organization (CATSO), which is the local metropolitan planning organization. The information contained in the Natural Resources Inventory document has been compiled from a host of public sources. The primary data focus of the NRI has been on land cover and tree canopy, which are the product of the classification work completed by the University of Missouri Geographic Resource Center using 2007 imagery acquired for this project by the City of Columbia. The NRI uses the area’s watersheds as the geographic basis for the data inventory. Landscape features cataloged include slopes, streams, soils, and vegetation. The impacts of regulations that manage the landscape and natural resources have been cataloged; including the characteristics of the built environment and the relationship to undeveloped property. Planning Level of Detail NRI data is designed to support planning and policy level analysis. Not all the geographic data created for the Natural Resources Inventory can be used for accurate parcel level mapping. The goal is to produce seamless datasets with a spatial quality to support parcel level mapping to apply NRI data to identify the individual property impacts. There are limitations to the data that need to be made clear to avoid misinterpretations. Stormwater Buffers: The buffer data used in the NRI are estimates based upon the stream centerlines, not the high water mark specified in City and County stormwater regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • William House Woven Wood Shade Collection
    SUGGESTED RETAIL PRICING SEPTEMBER, 2015* WILLIAM HOUSE WOVEN WOOD SHADE COLLECTION *THIS VERSION IS AN ADDENDUM, WHICH CONTAINS SOME PATTERN DISCONTINUATIONS (JAN. 2017) TEXTON.COM 800-442-1540 FAX: 972-276-5104 SEPTEMBER, 2015 MEASURING INSTRUCTIONS MEASURE EACH WINDOW INDIVIDUALLY AS SIZES MAY VARY. RECORD WIDTH FIRST, THEN HEIGHT (LENGTH) TO THE NEAREST 1/8”. MEASURE WIDTH FROM LEFT TO RIGHT, HEIGHT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM USING A METAL TAPE MEASURE. PLEASE DO NOT USE A CLOTH TAPE! INSIDE MOUNT INSIDE MOUNT BLINDS ARE INSTALLED INSIDE THE WINDOW FRAME. 1. MEASURE THE EXACT INSIDE WIDTH OF WINDOW FRAME FROM ONE INSIDE EDGE TO THE OTHER. TAKE THREE MEASURE- MENTS, ONE NEAR THE TOP, ONE IN THE CENTER AND ONE NEAR THE BOTTOM. RECORD THE NARROWEST MEASUREMENT. 2. MEASURE THE EXACT HEIGHT IN THREE PLACES, LEFT, CENTER AND RIGHT FROM TOP EDGE OF OPENING TO TOP OF SILL. RE- CORD THE LONGEST MEASUREMENT FOR WOVEN WOOD SHADES. 3. DO NOT TAKE DEDUCTIONS ON INSIDE MOUNT MEASUREMENTS. THE FACTORY WILL TAKE AN 1/2“ ALLOWANCES FOR 4. OPERATING CLEARANCE. 5. MEASURE THE WINDOW DIAGONALLY IN TWO PLACES. IF THE TWO DIAGONAL MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT THE SAME, WE SUGGEST AN OUTSIDE MOUNT APPLICATION FOR THE BEST SHADE PERFORMANCE AND APPEARANCE. OUTSIDE MOUNT OUTSIDE MOUNT BLINDS ARE INSTALLED OUTSIDE THE WINDOW FRAME, COVERING AN AREA LARGER THAN THE WINDOW ITSELF. 1. MEASURE THE EXACT WIDTH OF AREA TO BE COVERED. BE CERTAIN THE MEASUREMENT OVERLAPS THE WINDOW OPENING BY 2. AT LEAST 1 1/2” ON EACH SIDE TO ENSURE PRIVACY AND LIGHT CONTROL.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Prevailing Trade Winds: Climate and Weather in Hawaii Kindle
    PREVAILING TRADE WINDS: CLIMATE AND WEATHER IN HAWAII PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marie Sanderson | 126 pages | 01 Feb 1994 | University of Hawai'i Press | 9780824814915 | English | Honolulu, HI, United States Prevailing Trade Winds: Climate and Weather in Hawaii PDF Book Usually by late morning, winds increase again due to the additional forcing effects from the sun. Annual weather conditions in Hawaii vary neigh. Still, we can look at the long-term trends and get a general idea of what to expect. Project Seasons of the Year on YouTube channel:. The persistent trades mean steady winds in summer months. These conditions are often accompanied by higher gusts above 40 kts. However, trends from one day to the next may be inferred. Received: 14 Feb Published Online: Oct This book is not yet featured on Listopia. The trade winds that continually blow across the island cause it to be permanently bent in one direction. Link Network. Community Reviews. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Past Climatic Changes Dennis Nullet. Currents are not well defined around the Hawaiian Islands. The best method to differentiate current direction and speed is visual observations of buoys and onboard instrumentation. The temperature falls about 3. Easterly Waves and Remnants of Tropical Cyclones: The most likely effect of tropical cyclones may come from the remains an earlier tropical cyclone or easterly wave. Cite Data - Experimental. Enjoy a CovidSafe visit to the National Library. Clouds on the leeward side often have localized cells that contain increased wind speed as a result of downdrafts. July 4 — Independence Day. Summer kau lasts from May through October, with high temperatures and reliable trade winds.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainscapes Plants for Rain Gardens
    Rainscapes Plants for Rain Gardens rainscapes.org easy/ Botanical Name Common Name Bloom Color Sun Type Soils Height Spacing Comments reliable red and Sand, Loam, Clay, 9 Aquiligea canadensis Wild columbine June-Aug yellow Sun-Shade moist-dry 2' 1' deer resistant blue flowers, 3' tall, fine texture, blue yellow fall Sun-Pt summer flowers, yellow 9 Amsonia hubrechtii Blue-Star Flower May-June color Shade 2' 18" fall color, needs part sun Sand, Loam, Clay, 9 Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed June-Aug pink Sun-Shade Dry-wet 2'-4' 2' deer resistant 9 Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed May-Aug pale purple Sun Moist 3.5-6.5' 2' deer resistant Sand, Loam, Clay, 9 Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly weed may-june orange Sun Dry-med 1-3' 1-2' deer resistant Sand, Loam, Clay, 9 Aster novae angliae New England Aster Aug-Oct purple Sun-Shade Med-wet 2'-6' 2'-3' deer resistant pt Shade- 9 Aster divaricatus White Wood Aster Jul-Oct white sh dry-med wet 0.5-3' 1-2' spreads freely 9 Baptisia australis False Blue Indigo may-june blue, purple Sun-Shade sand, loam 3-5' 1-2' deer resistant host plant to Baltimore Sand, Loam, Clay, Checkerspot butterfly, MD Chelone glabra/obliqua Turtlehead aug-oct white/pink Sun-Shade Dry-med 1-4' 12-18" state insect host plant to Baltimore Sand, Loam, Clay, Checkerspot butterfly, MD Chelone lyonii Pink Turtlehead aug-oct white/pink Sun-Shade Dry-med 1-4' 12-18" state insect Chrysogonum virginianum green and gold mar-jun yellow Sun- Shade dry-med wet; loam 0.5-1' 1' evergreen ground cover Threadleaf 9 Coreopsis verticillata Coreopsis
    [Show full text]
  • Year Round Gardening Shade V Sun Get It Right! Fredricka Bogardus, Colorado Master Gardener
    Year Round Gardening Shade v Sun get it right! Fredricka Bogardus, Colorado Master Gardener The light available to a plant will directly impact its’ success in your garden. Understanding the light conditions before you select plants will make you a savvy buyer. Most plant tags with have some indication of whether the plant requires, full sun, part sun, part shade or shade. If you aren’t sure, take the time to check before you buy. These terms have a general meaning in horticulture. Full sun is 6 or more hours of direct sunlight per day, part sun is is 4 -6 hours per day. Partial shade is 2-4 hours of direct sun per day, shade means less than 2 hours of direct sun. A useful exercise is to actually measure the amount of direct sun each hour, record it for several different parts of your garden. Start at 7 am and go to 7 pm preferably in June or July. You may be very surprised at how much more understanding you will gain. You can purchase instruments for measuring the light, but for the home gardener your observation is probably just as useful. Another factor is the time of day of the sun. Shade plants are more likely to tolerate some sun in the early morning, but not the hot afternoon sun. Plants that get too much sun can appear bleached, or even scorched. If you notice these signs either relocate the plant or create some additional shade with a structure or perhaps a shrub or tree nearby. Plants that do not get enough sun may not flower abundantly, and will look spindly and weak.
    [Show full text]
  • Throwing Shade
    throwing 10 Sunny States BlockingShade 2018 Edition Distributed Solar Development By Greer Ryan Center for Biological Diversity April 2018 Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................1 Additional Report Highlights ......................................................3 Introduction ..............................................................................4 Key state-level distributed-solar policies and barriers ....................6 Renewable Portfolio Standards and Solar Carveouts .......................................................... 8 Net Metering .................................................................................................................... 9 Community Solar ............................................................................................................. 11 Interconnection Standards ............................................................................................... 12 Third-party Ownership ..................................................................................................... 13 Solar Rights Laws ........................................................................................................... 14 10 Sunny States Blocking Distributed Solar ..............................15 Alabama ......................................................................................................................... 16 Florida ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March 18, 2021 Re: Fossil Fuels and False Solutions in 2035 Clean Energy Standard Targets Dear Member of Congress: on Behalf Of
    March 18, 2021 Re: Fossil Fuels and False Solutions in 2035 Clean Energy Standard targets Dear Member of Congress: On behalf of our millions of members and activists nationwide, we write to express our concerns about the role of fossil fuels and other false solutions in recent proposals to achieve 100 percent clean energy by 2035. Although we applaud this new and genuinely ambitious timeline, technology-neutral frameworks pose an unacceptable risk to communities and the climate. The Clean Energy Standards (CES) now under discussion in Congress should rigorously define clean energy to include proven solutions like wind, solar, storage and efficiency—and exclude all fossil fuels and other false solutions. Sacrificing the very definition of “clean” in order to achieve 100 percent clean energy is self-defeating. The CLEAN Future Act (H.R. 1512) is a prime example of the type of half-measure we must avoid. The CES in the newly proposed bill is defined broadly enough to allow “natural” gas (fossil gas), biomass, and nuclear power to qualify. These false solutions are not clean energy and undermine efforts both to reduce emissions and protect communities from pollution. This iteration of the CLEAN Future Act includes encouraging environmental justice provisions that would benefit communities disproportionately exposed to pollution and climate impacts. That said, any legislative proposal that includes the promotion or facilitation of false energy solutions effectively debases any and all provisions, however strong, dedicated to increasing and centering environmental justice. Unfortunately, the legislation, as written, contradicts itself - recognizing the importance of reducing, removing, and preventing additional pollution in disadvantaged and vulnerable communities on the one hand, and promoting false climate solutions that do not stop emissions or other pollution at their source on the other.
    [Show full text]