GSK Form 20F 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GSK Form 20F 2007 As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 29, 2008 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number 1-15170 GlaxoSmithKline plc (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) England (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS England (Address of principal executive offices) Simon Bicknell Company Secretary GlaxoSmithKline plc 980 Great West Road Brentford England 011 44 20 8047 5000 [email protected] (Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person) Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered American Depositary Shares, each representing 2 New York Stock Exchange Ordinary Shares, Par value 25 pence Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None (Title of class) Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None (Title of class) Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Ordinary Shares of 25p each 5,508,392,868 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes No Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (Check one): Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board Other If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 Item 18 If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes No Annual Report 2007 Question How are you adapting your business model to one succeed in the current healthcare environment? Answer page 4 Question Why do you have a Consumer Healthcare two business? Answer page 5 Question Share prices in the sector haven’t performed well, three what is the outlook for GSK? Answer page 6 Question How is your research and development pipeline four performing? Answer page 7 Question What are you doing to improve healthcare in the five developing world? Answer page 8 Website GlaxoSmithKline’s website www.gsk.com gives additional information on the Group. Information made available on the website does not constitute part of this Annual Report. Notice regarding limitations on Director liability under English Law Under the UK Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the liability of Directors in respect of statements in and omissions from the Report of the Directors contained on pages 9 to 86, under English law the Directors would be liable to the company (but not to any third party) if the Report of the Directors contains errors as a result of recklessness or knowing misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, but would not otherwise be liable. Report of the Directors Pages 9 to 86 inclusive consist of a Report of the Directors that has been drawn up and presented in accordance with and in reliance upon English company law and the liabilities of the Directors in connection with that report shall be subject to the limitations and restrictions provided by such law. Cautionary statement regarding forward-looking statements The Group’s reports filed with or furnished to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including this document and written information released, or oral statements made, to the public in the future by or on behalf of the Group, may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give the Group’s current expectations or forecasts of future events. An investor can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as ‘anticipate’, ‘estimate’, ‘expect’, ‘intend’, ‘will’, ‘project’, ‘plan’, ‘believe’ and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective products or product approvals, future performance or results of current and anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, and financial results. The Group undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. The Group cautions investors that a number of important factors, including those in this document, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Such factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed under ‘Risk factors’ on pages 50 to 53 of this Annual Report. Contents REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS Mission Our global quest is to improve the quality of human life by enabling people to do more, feel better and Chairman and CEO summary 3 live longer. Five questions, five answers 4 Our Spirit We undertake our quest with the enthusiasm of entrepreneurs, excited by the constant search for Report of the Directors innovation. We value performance achieved with integrity. We will attain success as a world class Business review 9 global leader with each and every one of our people contributing with passion and an unmatched Corporate governance 59 sense of urgency. Remuneration Report 71 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Financial statements Directors’ statements of responsibility 88 Independent Auditors’ report 89 Consolidated income statement 90 Consolidated balance sheet 91 Consolidated cash flow statement 92 Consolidated statement of recognised income and expense 93 Notes to the financial statements 94 INVESTOR INFORMATION Investor information Financial record 160 Shareholder information 166 Taxation information for shareholders 169 Glossary of terms 173 GSK Annual Report 2007 1 Back to Contents Annual Report and Annual Review History and development of the company This report is the Annual Report of GlaxoSmithKline plc for the year ended 31st December 2007, prepared in GlaxoSmithKline plc is a public limited company incorporated on 6th December 1999 under English law. Its shares accordance with United Kingdom requirements. It was approved by the Board of Directors on 27th February 2008 are listed on the London Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange. On 27th December 2000 the and published on 28th February 2008. company acquired Glaxo Wellcome plc and SmithKline Beecham plc, both English public limited companies, by way of a scheme of arrangement for the merger of the two companies. Both Glaxo Wellcome and SmithKline A summary report on the year, the Annual Review 2007, which is prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Beecham were major global healthcare businesses. requirements and intended for the investor not needing the full detail of the Annual Report, is produced as a separate document. It includes the joint statement by the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, a summary GSK plc and its subsidiary and associated undertakings constitute a major global healthcare group engaged in the review of operations, summary financial statements and a summary remuneration report. The Annual Review is creation, discovery, development, manufacture and marketing of pharmaceutical and consumer health-related issued to all shareholders. The Annual Report is issued to shareholders who have elected to receive it. Both products. documents are available on GSK’s website. GSK has its corporate head office in London. It also has operational headquarters in Philadelphia and Research In this Report ‘GlaxoSmithKline’, the ‘Group’ or ‘GSK’ means GlaxoSmithKline plc and its subsidiary undertakings; Triangle Park, USA, and operations in some 114 countries, with products sold in over 140 countries. The principal the ‘company’ means GlaxoSmithKline plc; ‘GlaxoSmithKline share’ means an Ordinary share of GlaxoSmithKline research and development (R&D) facilities are in the UK, the USA, Belgium, Italy, Japan and Spain. Products are plc of 25p; an American Depositary Share (ADS) represents two GlaxoSmithKline shares.
Recommended publications
  • Fig. L COMPOSITIONS and METHODS to INHIBIT STEM CELL and PROGENITOR CELL BINDING to LYMPHOID TISSUE and for REGENERATING GERMINAL CENTERS in LYMPHATIC TISSUES
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date Χ 23 February 2012 (23.02.2012) WO 2U12/U24519ft ft A2 (51) International Patent Classification: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, A61K 31/00 (2006.01) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, PCT/US201 1/048297 KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (22) International Filing Date: ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, 18 August 201 1 (18.08.201 1) NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (25) Filing Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (26) Publication Language: English ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/374,943 18 August 2010 (18.08.2010) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/441,485 10 February 201 1 (10.02.201 1) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, 61/449,372 4 March 201 1 (04.03.201 1) US ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, (72) Inventor; and EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, ΓΓ, LT, LU, (71) Applicant : DEISHER, Theresa [US/US]; 1420 Fifth LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Anti-CD3 Action? This Information Is Current As of September 26, 2021
    Differential Response of Regulatory and Conventional CD4 + Lymphocytes to CD3 Engagement: Clues to a Possible Mechanism of Anti-CD3 Action? This information is current as of September 26, 2021. Li Li, Junko Nishio, André van Maurik, Diane Mathis and Christophe Benoist J Immunol published online 28 August 2013 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2013/08/27/jimmun ol.1300408 Downloaded from Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/08/28/jimmunol.130040 Material 8.DC1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 26, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. Published August 28, 2013, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300408 The Journal of Immunology Differential Response of Regulatory and Conventional CD4+ Lymphocytes to CD3 Engagement: Clues to a Possible Mechanism of Anti-CD3 Action? Li Li,* Junko Nishio,* Andre´ van Maurik,† Diane Mathis,* and Christophe Benoist* Several clinical trials have shown anti-CD3 treatment to be a promising therapy for autoimmune diabetes, but its mechanism of action remains unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaxosmithkline Bangladesh Limited (GSK)
    GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited (GSK) Recruitment and Selection Process of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited: An Evaluation nd Date of Submission: 2 September, 2014 ©Daffodil International University DAFFODIL INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Internship Report On Recruitment and Selection Process of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited: An Evaluation Submitted To Dr. Zakir Hossain Dean& Professor Faculty of Business & Economics Daffodil International University Submitted By Ishrat Jahan ID: 131-14-1019 Masters of Business Administration Daffodil International University Date of Submission: 2nd September, 2014 ©Daffodil International University Letter of Transmittal September 2, 2014 To Dr. Zakir Hossain Dean & Professor Faculty of Business and Economics Daffodil International University Dhaka-1205 Subject: Submission of internship report on recruitment and selection process: An evaluation of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited Sir, I am highly satisfied to submit my report on recruitment and selection process: an evaluation of GSK. For preparing this report I tried my best to accumulate relevant and upgraded information from available sources. In preparing this report, I tried my level best to make it a complete one and sincerely look forward to any possible correction. I am very glad because you also given the opportunity to prepare this report .I hope that this report will meet the standards of your judgments. Your Sincerely ---------------- Ishrat Jahan ©Daffodil International University i Certificate of the Supervisor This is to certify that the internship report titled ―Recruitment and Selection Process of GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited: An Evaluation‖, has been prepared by Ms. Ishrat Jahan bearing ID: 131-14-1019 under my supervision, a practical study on GlaxoSmithKline Bangladesh Limited. I think on the basic of declaration Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Gilead and Glaxo's HIV Battle Intensifies
    February 14, 2017 Gilead and Glaxo’s HIV battle intensifies Madeleine Armstrong The first phase II data with Gilead’s HIV integrase inhibitor bictegravir have set up a showdown with Glaxosmithkline/Viiv Healthcare’s marketed product dolutegravir. But Glaxo is already one step ahead with data from a two-drug combo that could reduce the side-effect burden for HIV patients. Glaxo believes that this doublet could “reshape the whole game”, the group's chief executive, Andrew Witty, said on its fourth-quarter earnings call. HIV has been one of the group’s main drivers in recent quarters as it has taken market share from Gilead, which is becoming increasingly reliant on HIV as its hepatitis C franchise slows (see tables below). Bictegravir vs dolutegravir The phase II study, presented today at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Seattle, compared bictegravir plus emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide – known as FTC/TAF – with dolutegravir plus FTC/TAF in 98 treatment-naive, HIV-infected adults. Both are the latest iterations of the integrase inhibitor class, and unlike older products with the same mechanism do not require boosting – taking another drug to raise circulating levels – so have a lower risk of adverse events and drug-drug interactions. The phase II trial found similar response rates with a bictegravir-containing regimen versus a dolutegravir- containing therapy, which should boost confidence in Gilead’s compound ahead of phase III readouts expected mid-year. It found a 97% response in the bictegravir arm at 24 and 48 weeks, versus 94% at week 24 and 91% at week 48 in the dolutegravir arm, but the difference was not statistically significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharma Pricing, Non-Profit Ties Get Increasing Scrutiny from Prosecutors
    REGULATORY UPDATE REGULATORY UPDATE CONSUMER DRUGS Pediatric Rare Disease Voucher Japan Wants EMA To Stay In Digital Marketing: Health Care Brands’ Program Faces Expiration, p. 12 UK Post-Brexit, p. 15 Window Into Consumers’ Lives, p. 20 Pharma intelligence Pinkpink.pharmamedtechbi.comSheetVol. 78 / No. 38 September 19, 2016 informa Mylan NV was subpoenaed for material Pharma Pricing, Non-Profit Ties Get about the pricing of its generic doxycycline and communications with competitors. And Valeant Pharmaceuticals International Inc. is Increasing Scrutiny From Prosecutors facing several probes about its pricing and BRENDA SANDBURG [email protected] patient assistance programs (see chart, p. 5). Mylan’s doxycycline price increases were called out by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., in October 2014 when they sent letters to 14 generic drug makers about the pricing of their prod- ucts. They noted that from October 2013 to April 2014, the average price charged for a 500-count bottle of 100 mg tablets had risen from $20 to $1,829, an 8,281% increase. Mylan is now under fire for repeatedly rais- ing the price of its severe allergy treatment EpiPen (epinephrine), which has increased from about $100 for a two-pack in 2008 to more than $600. Members of Congress sent a flurry of letters to the company requesting an explanation for the price hikes. And on Sept. 6, New York Attorney Gen- Shutterstock: blvdone Shutterstock: eral Eric Schneiderman announced that his office has begun an investigation into rug makers have been unable to programs, contractual agreements with Mylan with regard to EpiPen, saying a pre- shake free of government inves- pharmacy benefit managers, support of liminary review revealed that Mylan may Dtigations of their marketing and non-profit organizations, and calculation have inserted potentially anticompetitive sales practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2005
    GS2184_Review_A\W2.qxd 7/3/06 4:58 pm Page fc1 Annual Review 2005 human being Do more, feel better, live longer GS2184_Review_A\W2.qxd 9/3/06 1:28 pm Page ifc2 01 An interview with Sir Christopher Gent, Chairman, and JP Garnier, Chief Executive Officer 05 Tachi Yamada, Chairman, Research & Development, Pharmaceuticals 06 Jean Stéphenne, President and General Manager, GSK Biologicals 08 John Clarke, President, Consumer Healthcare 11 David Stout, President, Pharmaceutical Operations 14 Performance highlights 15 Business operating review 18 The Board 19 The Corporate Executive Team 20 Summary remuneration report 23 Corporate governance 24 Responsibility statements 25 Summary financial statements 26 Summary information under US GAAP 27 Shareholder information 29 Chairman and CEO’s closing letter JP Garnier (left) and Sir Christopher Gent (right) GS2184_Review_A\W2.qxd 7/3/06 5:01 pm Page 01 “Discovering important medicines, eradicating diseases, improving the quality of people’s lives and making medicines available to a greater number of people. This is what we do – and what we do matters to people.” JP Garnier, Chief Executive Officer An interview with Sir Christopher Gent, Chairman and JP Garnier, Chief Executive Officer 2005: a year of success and progress “Thanks to the efforts of our employees around the company’s pipeline is one of the largest and most world, 2005 was a very successful year for GSK,” says promising in the industry, with 149 projects in clinical JP Garnier, Chief Executive Officer. “Not only was it development (as at the end of February 2006), our best year ever from a financial standpoint, we also including 95 new chemical entities (NCEs), 29 product made substantial progress with our pipeline of line extensions (PLEs) and 25 vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr
    UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/11/12/Add.2 5 May 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Eleventh session Agenda item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health, Paul Hunt* Annex MISSION TO GLAXOSMITHKLINE** * The present report was submitted late in order to incorporate the most recent information. Paul Hunt ended his mandate as Special Rapporteur on 31 July 2008. His report is circulated as an addendum to the report of his successor, Anand Grover, who took up the mandate on 1 August 2008. ** The summary of the present report is circulated in all official languages. The report itself, annexed to the summary, is circulated as received, in the language of submission only. GE.09-13131 (E) 130509 A/HRC/11/12/Add.2 page 2 Summary The Special Rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health visited the headquarters of GlaxoSmithKline, one of the world’s leading research-based pharmaceutical companies, in June 2008 for substantive interviews with the company’s senior management. In the Special Rapporteur’s previous reports, he examined States’ responsibilities in relation to access to medicines. However, enhancing access to medicines is a shared responsibility. The Millennium Development Goals recognize that pharmaceutical companies have a responsibility to improve access to medicines. In the present report, the Special Rapporteur outlines the responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies, including innovator, generic and biotechnology companies, with regard to the right to health in relation to access to medicines.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 GSK Corporate Responsibility Report
    2005 GSK Corporate Responsibility Report Introduction 1 Introduction Page Our contribution to society 1 About this report 1 CEO and Chairman’s letter 3 Managing corporate responsibility 4 Why CR is important to GSK 4 CR governance 4 Our CR principles 6 Stakeholder engagement 7 Stakeholder feedback 7 How we are responding 9 Government and external affairs 10 Membership of trade associations 10 US lobbying expenditures 10 Political donations 10 Our position on key issues 11 Patient advocacy 11 2 Access to medicine 3 Research 4 Ethical conduct 5 Employment practices 6 Human rights 7 Environment 8 Community investment 9 Data summary 1 1 GSK CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY REPORT 2005 Introduction Welcome to GSK’s Corporate Responsibility Report 2005. This report explains our approach to the wide range of social, ethical and environmental issues associated with our business and reports our performance in 2005. The full web-based report is available on www.gsk.com GSK is a research-based pharmaceutical company, with operations in 119 countries. We make prescription medicines, vaccines, over-the-counter medicines, and consumer healthcare products. Our business accounts for 6.3% of the world’s pharmaceutical market. We have strong positions in several therapeutic areas including anti-infectives, asthma, cancer, cardiovascular, depression, diabetes, HIV/AIDS and urology. For an overview of our business, see our Annual Report. OUR CONTRIBUTION TO SOCIETY This report explains our approach to the significant In the last 80 years, medicines and vaccines have corporate responsibility issues for our business, including: transformed millions of lives. They have helped to increase • Access to medicines – how we make our medicines life expectancy and lowered death rates from conditions accessible to poor patients in developed and developing such as heart disease, stroke and cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Section
    Strategic report In this section Chairman’s statement 2 CEO’s review 4 Business overview 6 The global context 8 Our business model 12 Our strategic priorities 14 How we performed 16 Risk management 18 Grow 20 Deliver 32 Simplify 44 Our financial architecture 48 Responsible business 50 Financial review 58 Strategic report Chairman’s statement Chairman’s statement To shareholders The value of the significant changes that have been made in recent years is evidenced in our performance this year “ Since Sir Andrew became It is clear from the following pages that Through the Audit & Risk Committee, we the Group made good progress against oversee the issues and challenges faced by CEO, the company has its strategy in 2013. management, and encourage the creation of an environment in which GSK can achieve The Board believes the business is seeing returned £30 billion its strategic ambitions in a responsible and the benefits of the significant changes the sustainable manner. to shareholders.” management team has driven over recent years to deliver sustainable growth, reduce risk and I have no doubt that commercial success is enhance returns to shareholders. directly linked to operating in a responsible way and which meets the changing expectations of The notably strong performance from the society. In this respect, the company continues R&D organisation in 2013 – with six major to adopt industry-leading positions on a range new product approvals in areas including of issues. respiratory disease, HIV and cancer – is critical to the longer-term prospects of the The announcement of plans during 2013 to Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Solpadeine Max Tabs 03
    File title: 9034_SOMT01240812v1_Solpadeine Max tabs 20s-30s PIL v3F • If you take a painkiller for headaches for more than 3 days it can make Item No.: 11000000010649 PROSP SOLPADEINA MAX TABLETAS UK 1212 them worse. Last edit: 22nd November 2013 Do not take Solpadeine Max Tablets: Brand: Solpadeine Tablets Variant: MAX Tablets • If you have ever had an allergic reaction to paracetamol, codeine, other opioid painkillers or to any of the other ingredients (listed in Section 6) Component: Leaflet • If you are taking other medicines containing paracetamol or codeine • For pain relief in children and adolescents (0-18 years of age) after removal • This medicine is for the short term treatment of acute moderate pain Market/s: UK of their tonsils or adenoids due to obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome when other painkillers have not worked. • If you know that you metabolise very rapidly codeine into morphine • You should only take this product for a maximum of 3 days at a time. If Dimensions: 150 x 100mm (Drw No. L613D005) • If you are breastfeeding. you need to take it for longer than 3 days you should see your doctor or pharmacist for advice. Printer: Santiago Gonzalez • This medicine contains codeine which can cause addiction if you take it Ask your doctor before you take this medicine: continuously for more than 3 days. This can give you withdrawal Substrate: Paper symptoms from the medicine when you stop taking it. • If you have liver or kidney disease, including alcoholic liver disease Tablets EAN Code: N/A • If you take this medicine for headaches for more than 3 days it can make • If you have bowel problems including blockage of your bowel them worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
    REVIEW published: 09 July 2021 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686155 Promising Therapeutic Targets for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis † † Jie Huang 1 , Xuekun Fu 1 , Xinxin Chen 1, Zheng Li 1, Yuhong Huang 1 and Chao Liang 1,2* 1 Department of Biology, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China, 2 Institute of Integrated Bioinfomedicine and Translational Science (IBTS), School of Chinese Medicine, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic poly-articular chronic autoimmune joint disease that mainly damages the hands and feet, which affects 0.5% to 1.0% of the population worldwide. With the sustained development of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), significant success has been achieved for preventing and relieving disease activity in RA patients. Unfortunately, some patients still show limited response to DMARDs, which puts forward new requirements for special targets and novel therapies. Understanding the pathogenetic roles of the various molecules in RA could facilitate discovery of potential therapeutic targets and approaches. In this review, both Edited by: existing and emerging targets, including the proteins, small molecular metabolites, and Trine N. Jorgensen, epigenetic regulators related to RA, are discussed, with a focus on the mechanisms that Case Western Reserve University, result in inflammation and the development of new drugs for blocking the various United States modulators in RA. Reviewed by: Åsa Andersson, Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, targets, proteins, small molecular metabolites, epigenetic regulators Halmstad University, Sweden Abdurrahman Tufan, Gazi University, Turkey *Correspondence: INTRODUCTION Chao Liang [email protected] Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classified as a systemic poly-articular chronic autoimmune joint † disease that primarily affects hands and feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting/Poll Results
    GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC - RESULT OF AGM GlaxoSmithKline plc (GSK) announces that at its Annual General Meeting (AGM) today, all resolutions were passed by shareholders. GlaxoSmithKline AGM Poll Results The following table shows the votes cast for each resolution: Resolution Total votes % Total votes % Total votes Votes for* against cast withheld** Adoption of Directors’ 1 Report and Financial Statements 3,713,877,875 98.86 42,764,532 1.14 3,756,642,407 9,313,386 Approval of the 2 Remuneration Report 3,528,115,173 94.55 203,482,136 5.45 3,731,597,309 34,358,483 Election of 3 Lynn Elsenhans 3,753,666,422 99.90 3,577,765 0.10 3,757,244,187 8,711,607 Election of 4 Jing Ulrich 3,753,601,642 99.90 3,623,347 0.10 3,757,224,989 8,730,805 Election of 5 Hans Wijers 3,712,833,757 98.82 44,327,830 1.18 3,757,161,587 8,794,257 Re-election of Sir 6 Christopher Gent 3,679,075,355 97.92 78,304,492 2.08 3,757,379,847 8,575,946 Re-election of 7 Sir Andrew Witty 3,753,850,300 99.90 3,750,413 0.10 3,757,600,713 8,355,081 Re-election of Professor Sir 8 Roy Anderson 3,753,929,716 99.91 3,483,857 0.09 3,757,413,573 8,542,221 Re-election of 9 Dr Stephanie Burns 3,749,134,033 99.78 8,228,665 0.22 3,757,362,698 8,592,951 Re-election of 10 Stacey Cartwright 3,735,971,985 99.43 21,360,372 0.57 3,757,332,357 8,623,292 Re-election of 11 Simon Dingemans 3,749,800,702 99.80 7,359,374 0.20 3,757,160,076 8,795,718 Re-election of 12 Judy Lewent 3,746,232,485 99.71 11,060,403 0.29 3,757,292,888 8,662,906 Re-election of 13 Sir Deryck Maughan 3,748,191,348 99.76 9,051,199 0.24
    [Show full text]