DOCSLIB.ORG

Norton Sound/Bering Strait Regional Comprehensive Salmon Plan, 1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Norton Sound/Bering Strait Regional Comprehensive Salmon Plan, 1996 NORTON SOUND/BERING STRAIT REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE SALMON PLAN 1996-2010 Developed by the Norton Sound/Bering Strait Regional Planning Team CHUKCHI ~ Sf 111-4 . IT 0 P f :::6:.DiOmede tv I tv ..... <l:lslands S U L -4 5 £. ". NORTON SOUND r\ N G \3 £. Frank Rue, Commissioner Alaska Department of Fish and Game June 1996 TONY KNOWLES, GOVERNOR DEPARTMENTOFFISHANDGAME P. 0. BOX 25526 JUNEAU, ALASKA 99802-5526 PHONE: (907) 465-4100 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FACSIMILE: (907) 465-2332 June 21, 1996 Mr. Eugene Asicksik Mr. Pete Velsko Co-chairmen Norton Sound/Bering Strait RPT 601 West 5th Avenue, Key Bank Bldg., Suite 415 Anchorage, AK 99501 Dear Sirs: This letter is to officially inform you and all members of the Norton Sound/Bering Strait regional Planning Team (NSRPT) of my approval of the Norton SoundlBering Strait Regional Comprehensive Salmon Plan 1996-2010. Prior to the submittal of the plan for my consideration, I have been informed that, in compliance with AS 16.10.375, the NSRPT distributed a public review draft in May 1996 to more than 200 individuals, organizations, and agencies. NSRPT also solicited public comments on proposed revisions through published notices in regional newspapers, public notices posted throughout the region, and a scheduled NSRPT meeting that occurred in Nome on June 11, 1996, to address comments and questions. The plan has also undergone complete technical reviews by staffs from Alaska Department of Fish and Game (i.e., Commercial Fisheries Management and Development, Sport Fish, Subsistence, and Habitat Divisions) and the Bureau ofLand Management. I am confident that the NSRPT has been responsive to the comments and suggestions resulting from this thorough review process. Based on the efforts of the NSRPT in preparing this plan and cormnents I have received on the quality of those efforts, I believe a viable and responsible document has been produced for the Norton Sound/Bering Straits region that emphasizes habitat restoration, investigative studies, a central incubation facility, and improved management strategies for increasing local production of salmon and equitably providing benefits to all user groups. Therefore, I offer my congratulations and appreciation to you both and all members of the team for cooperating with the department and me in producing this comprehensive plan. Sincerely, Frank Rue Commissioner 11-K2LH I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Development of a comprehensive salmon plan for the Norton Sound/Bering Strait region was initiated by the Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation (NSEDC) and Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) in the spring of 1994 with the organizational meeting ofthe Norton Sound/Bering Strait Regional Planning Team (NSRPT). This process was initiated in compliance with the commissioner's statutory mandate for salmon planning and in response to interests expressed by NSEDC. Desires and objectives of the area fishermen, as expressed by the Norton Sound/Beling Strait Regional Planning Team (NSRPT), indicate an emphasis on .restoring habitat of previously productive salmon systems damaged through mining/dredging activities; reestablishing .historic runs of chum salmon. through instream incub~tors, central incubation facilities, and/or fry planting techniques; and practicing better management. There is very little support or desire for large-scale hatchery production of pink and chum salmon stocks, such as that proposed in other regions. There is also strong recognition of the need to (1) protectgenetic integrity of local stocks and a desire to (2) promote a. more comprehensive understanding of local watersheds and their potential for increased production of chum, sockeye, and coho salmon. Specific actions promoted by this plan include the following: Improve management of existing regional salmon fisheries by (1) increasing monitoring of chum and coho escapements in the region and (2) encouraging knowledge of stock identity of salmon harvested in the region. Improve projections of salmon production in regional waters by (1) conducting comprehensive surveys of Norton Sound systems and (2) encouraging studies of nearshore and marine environments and their capacity to support salmon populations. Investigate rehabilitation and enhancement opportunities by (1) evaluating results of fry-stocking, instream incubators, or other rehabilitation or enhancement potentials and (2)' assessing area watersheds for removal of barriers to fish migration or repair of damaged spawning/rearing habitat. Develop central incubation facilities by. (1) establishing recirculating incubators in each community and (2) pursuing placement and .operation of stream-side incubators in locations identified in the studies outlined above. The Norton Sound/Bering Strait RPT has set preliminary target common property fishery harvest goals that will result from existing natural production and any rehabilitation or enhancement work conducted under this plan. These goals, which should be achieved by the year 2010, are 1isted below by species for the entire regional salmon fishery; the recent IS-year (1981-1995) average commercial harvest by species is also included. 1 Species Average Annual Annual Target Goal Commercial Harvest (2010) (1981-1995) Chinook 7,865 20,000 Sockeye 242 10,000 Coho 54,872 90,000 Pink 133,971 1,250,000 Chum 113,643 200,000 Total 310,593 1,570,000 In all its efforts, the Norton Sound/Bering Strait RPT hopes this plan will initiate equitable benefits to all user groups and increase local production of salmon. To accomplish these goals, the NSRPT realizes that funding from NSEDC and other sources will need to be obtained to support the programs outlined in this plan. Pursuit of this plan will also require conducting a suite of resource inventory and habitat studies of the region's watersheds, accessing some form of central incubation facility or' facilities (e.g., community recirculating incubators), and providing adequate funding for the Department of Fish and Game's fishery management and development programs. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i INTRODUCTION ............................. 1 Authority for Writing the Plan 1 Village Informational Meetings 3 Ackn.owledgments 3 GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS 5 Principles ..............................................5 Assumptions ................. .,. .........................5 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, STRATEGIES, AND PROJECTS 7 Goals 7 Harvest Goals 7 Research, Management, and Planning Goals 18 Objectives 19 Stream Clearance and/or Modification of Barriers 19 Glacier Creek Culvert ' 19 Rocky Mountain Creek Culvert Corrections 19 Rearing Ponds 20 Anvil Creek Coho Rehabilitation 20 Little Creek Coho Rehabilitation ...................... 20 Center Creek Off-Channel Excavations .................. 20 Hastings Creek Off-Channel Excavations 20 Dry Creek Rearing Ponds .......................... 21 Nome-Taylor Road Rearing Ponds 21 Sinuk River Rearing Pond 21 Solomon River Rearing Pond .. ............ .. ... ". ...... 21 Pilgrim River Rearing Pond - 21 Project Timetable 21 Strategies and Projects 22 Production/Harvest Strategies ............................ 22 Management Strategies ................................ 22· Research and Evaluation Strategies ......................... 23 Monitoring and Evaluating Strategies 23 --Continued-- iii 15-YEAR ACTION PLAN ...................•...... 0••0••••••0• 24 Ongoing projects 0 ••• 0 ••••••• 0 • 0 0 0 0 •••• 0 0 •• 0 0 •• 0 0 • 0 ••••• 0 24 Potential Incubation Box Site Locations 0•0•••••••0•••00000•0• 24 Winter Chum Salmon Restoration Study/Aerial Survey 0 0 0 0 0 • 24 Limnology Investigations 0•00••0•0•0••0•••00••0•0••0000• 25 Nome Central Incubation Facility 0 0 ••• 0 •••••• 0 •• 0 •••• 25 Weir/Counting Tower Sites 0 0 •• 0 0 ••••• 0 ••• 0 0 ••• 0 •••• 0 0 •• 26 Eldorado River Counting Tower . 0•••00••••••0••00•••• 26 Snake River Counting Tower 00••••000••0••••0•0•00•• 27 Potential Restoration or Enhancement Projects .... 0 • 0 0 ••••• 0 ••• 0 • 0 0 0 27 Construction of Instream Incubation Boxes . 0••00•0•00••000•••• 27 Boulder Creek Rehabilitation . 0••0••••00••000000:00•0000• 27 Banner Creek Coho Salmon Rehabilitation 0 0 • 0 •••• 0 •• 0 0 ••• 0 ••• 28 Kawerak, Inc. Proposed Counting Tower Sites 0 0 •• 0 0·0 28 North River Counting Tower ... 0 ••• 0 0 0 •• 0 ••• 0 ••••••• 28 Pilgrim River Counting Tower ..... 0000•000••••••••0• 28 ~ Mukluktulik River Chum Salmon Restoration 0 •• •••• 0 0 ••• 0 0 0 •• 28 Quiktalik Creek Chum Salmon Restoration 0••••••00•••0••••••0 29 Evaluation of Otolith Patterns to Identify Incubation Reared Fish . 0 • 0 0 • 29 Eldorado River Chum Salmon Restoration . 0 • .'. ••0•••00•••0••• 29 Sinuk River Chum Salmon Restoration . 0•00•••••00•••0••••00 30 Moonlight Springs Centralized Incubation Facility 00•0•000••00••• 30 Development of Pilot Central Incubation Facility ...... 0 '. • 0 0 0 0 • • • 29 Iron Creek Replacement of Road Culvert . 0 0 • • • •• • 0 • • • 0 • • • 0 •. •• 30 Kuiak River Salmon Habitat Investigation . 000••0•••••••0•0•0• 30 Limnological/Fisheries Assessment of Imurik Basin . 000••00•••0• 31 Potential Systems for Restoration or Enhancement in Norton Sound/Bering Strait Region . 00 0 • 0 • 0 0 • 0 0 •••••• 0 0 •• 0 0 •• 0 • 31 Port Clarence District 0••0•••000•00••000000••0000000••0 41 Agiapuk River 0 • 0 0 •••• • 0 • 0 • •• ••00000•000000000•00 41 Sunset Creek . 0•••0••0••0••0000•0000000•0000••0 41 Bluestone River 00000•0000•000•0•••000000•0••00• 41 Cobblestone River 0 0 •• 0 0 0 •• 000000•00•00000000•00 41 Kuzitrin River . 0 0 •••••••••• 0 •• 0 0 •••• 0 •• 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 41 Salmon Lake 000•0000••0••00••••••••••00•••00•• 41 Pilgrim River . 0 • 0 • 0 ••• 0 •• 0 0 0 •• 0 0 • 0 0 ••• 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 • 42 Norton Sound District: 0 0 .' 0 0 ••••••••••••• 0 • 0 • 0 •• 42 Tisuk River .. 0 • 0 • 0 0 ••• 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 • 0 •• 0 •• 0 •• 0 0 0 • 0 • 42 Feather River 0•••••00•0••0••000•0••••00• 42 Sinuk River 00••••0•••••••••0•0•00••• 42 Glacial Lake .... 0 0 • 0 • 0 • • o. • 0•••0••••0••••000•• 43 Cripple River .. 00•0•••0••••000•••00••••0• •• 0 0 0 43 --Continued-- iv Subdistrict 1 (Nome) 0 0 • 000000000000000000000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 Penny River 0000000000000000000000000000000000 43 Snake River 000000000•••••••• •• •••••••••••0••• 43 Nome River .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131
    Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS
    VOLUME 1. MARINE MAMMALS, MARINE BIRDS VOLUME 2, FISH, PLANKTON, BENTHOS, LITTORAL VOLUME 3, EFFECTS, CHEMISTRY AND MICROBIOLOGY, PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY VOLUME 4. GEOLOGY, ICE, DATA MANAGEMENT Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf July - Sept 1976 quarterly reports from Principal Investigators participatingin a multi-year program of environmental assessment related to petroleum development on the Alaskan Continental Shelf. The program is directed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Land Management. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES Boulder, Colorado November 1976 VOLUME 1 CONTENTS MARINE MAMMALS vii MARINE BIRDS 167 iii MARINE MAMMALS v MARINE MAMMALS Research Unit Proposer Title Page 34 G. Carleton Ray Analysis of Marine Mammal Remote 1 Douglas Wartzok Sensing Data Johns Hopkins U. 67 Clifford H. Fiscus Baseline Characterization of Marine 3 Howard W. Braham Mammals in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 68 Clifford H. Fiscus Abundance and Seasonal Distribution 30 Howard W. Braham of Marine Mammals in the Gulf of Roger W. Mercer Alaska NWFC/NMFS 69 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bowhead 33 Howard W. Braham and Belukha Whales in the Bering Sea NWFC/NMFS 70 Clifford H. Fiscus Distribution and Abundance of Bow- 36 Howard W. Braham et al head and Belukha Whales in the NWFC/NMFS Beaufort and Chukchi Seas 194 Francis H. Fay Morbidity and Mortality of Marine 43 IMS/U. of Alaska Mammals 229 Kenneth W. Pitcher Biology of the Harbor Seal, Phoca 48 Donald Calkins vitulina richardi, in the Gulf of ADF&G Alaska 230 John J. Burns The Natural History and Ecology of 55 Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Bottom and Near-Bottom Sediment Dynamics in Norton Sound, Alaska
    BOTTOM AND NEAR-BOTTOM SEDIMENT DYNAMICS IN NORTON SOUND, ALASKA by David A. Cacchione and David E. Drake Pacific-Arctic Branch of Marine Geology U.S. Geological Survey 345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Final Report Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program Research Unit 430 April 1979 77 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. SUMMARY . 81 A. Overview . 81 B. Results . 81 II. INTRODUCTION . 82 A. General Nature and Scope. 82 B. Specific Objectives . 84 C. Relevance to Problems of Petroleum Development . 84 III. CURRENT STATX! OF KNOWLEDGE . 85 IV. STUDY AREA . 86 V. DATA COLLECTION . 87 VI. RESULTS . 87 A. Suspended Particulate Matter . 87 B. Temporal Variations -GEOPROBE Results . 87 Hourly Average Current Measurements . 88 Burst Data . 90 Other Current Data . 90 VII. DISCUSSION . 92 A. Transport Pathways of Suspended Matter . 92 B. Comparison of1976and 1977 Results . 96 C. Temporal Variability . 97 VIII. CONCLUSIONS . ...102 IX. NEEDS FOR FURTHER STUDY . ...103 X. REFERENCES . ...104 APPENDIXES A. ANew Instrument Systemto Investigate Sediment Dynamics on Continental Shelves (abstract) . ...107 B. Sediment Transport in Norton Sound, Alaska (abstract) . 108 C. Sediment Transport during the Winter on the Yukon Prodelta, Norton Sound, Alaska (abstract) . ...109 D. Storm-Generated Sediment Transport on the Bering Sea Shelf, Alaska (abstract) . ...110 E. Bottom Currents on the Yukon Prodelta, July8- September 25, 1977 . ...111 L SU-MNMRIY A. Overview An investigation of sediment dynamics in Norton Sound and other sections of the northern Bering Sea was conducted to define the principal pathways and mechanisms of bottom and suspended materials transport. A major topic of this research is the complicated interrelationships of sediment movement and hydrodynamic stresses that occur in the marine environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Sound Shaktoolik and Unalakleet Subdistricts Chinook Salmon Stock Status and Action Plan
    NORTON SOUND SHAKTOOLIK AND UNALAKLEET SUBDISTRICTS CHINOOK SALMON STOCK STATUS AND ACTION PLAN A Report to the Alaska Board of Fisheries By: Wesley W. Jones Regional Information Report No. 3A03-38 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Commercial Fisheries 333 Raspberry Road Anchorage, Alaska 99518 1 The Regional Information Report Series was established in 1987 to provide an information access system for all unpublished divisional reports. These reports frequently serve diverse ad hoc informational purposes or archive basic uninterpreted data. To accommodate needs for up-to-date information, reports in this series may contain preliminary data; this information may be subsequently finalized and published in the formal literature. Consequently, these reports should not be cited without prior approval of the author of the Division of Commercial Fisheries. AUTHOR Wesley W. Jones is the Assistant Area Management Biologist for the Norton Sound – Port Clarence Area and the Kotzebue Area, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, P.O. Box 1148, Nome, AK 99762. Office Of Equal Opportunity (OEO) Statement The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information please write to ADF&G, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Annual Report
    Norton Sound Economic Development Corporation 2005 Annual Report Brevig Mission • Diomede • Elim • Gambell • Golovin • Koyuk • Nome • Saint Michael • Savoonga • Shaktoolik • Stebbins • Teller • Unalakleet • Wales • White Mountain NSEDC MISSION STATEMENT “NSEDC will participate in and encourage the clean harvest of all Bering Sea fisheries to promote and provide economic development through educa- tion, employment, training and financial assistance to member communities and Western Alaska, while protecting subsistence resources.” RUSSIA U.S.A. RUSSIA U.S.A. Big Diomede Little Wales Diomede Brevig Mission Gambell Teller Savoonga BERING SEA Nome White Mountain Eli Koyuk Golovin NORTON SOUND Shaktoolik Unalakleet Stebbins Saint Michael The Year in Review Message From The Chairman projects as they relate to our current Commission took your comments and mission and methods for delivering incorporated them into a formula for benefits to the region. CDQ Program evolution. NSEDC and the other CDQ groups will be working A fundamental part of this process with these ideas to further develop the is to keep looking to the future to program into a form that will bring the anticipate where the company will be regulatory and statutory ability for us in terms of economic and regulatory to advance how we do business in the capability, and to integrate that with region. After amending the laws that hope the Chairman of the NSEDC the major needs of our communities. I govern the CDQ program, the next step Board of Directors never gets tired of NSEDC has been at the forefront of is to examine how NSEDC interacts with delivering the message that NSEDC has the movement to amend the program its communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy Abstract Approved: John V
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF MIAH ALLAN BEAL for the Doctor of Philosophy (Name) (Degree) in Oceanography presented on August 12.1968 (Major) (Date) Title:Batymety and_Strictuof_thp..4rctic_Ocean Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: John V. The history of the explordtion of the Central Arctic Ocean is reviewed.It has been only within the last 15 years that any signifi- cant number of depth-sounding data have been collected.The present study uses seven million echo soundings collected by U. S. Navy nuclear submarines along nearly 40, 000 km of track to construct, for the first time, a reasonably complete picture of the physiography of the basin of the Arctic Ocean.The use of nuclear submarines as under-ice survey ships is discussed. The physiography of the entire Arctic basin and of each of the major features in the basin are described, illustrated and named. The dominant ocean floor features are three mountain ranges, generally paralleling each other and the 40°E. 140°W. meridian. From the Pacific- side of the Arctic basin toward the Atlantic, they are: The Alpha Cordillera; The Lomonosov Ridge; andThe Nansen Cordillera. The Alpha Cordillera is the widest of the three mountain ranges. It abuts the continental slopes off the Canadian Archipelago and off Asia across more than550of longitude on each slope.Its minimum width of about 300 km is located midway between North America and Asia.In cross section, the Alpha Cordillera is a broad arch rising about two km, above the floor of the basin.The arch is marked by volcanoes and regions of "high fractured plateau, and by scarps500to 1000 meters high.The small number of data from seismology, heat flow, magnetics and gravity studies are reviewed.The Alpha Cordillera is interpreted to be an inactive mid-ocean ridge which has undergone some subsidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Alaska
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Alaska By H. P. Eisenhuth - . GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 585 Washington 1968 United States Department of the Interior STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary Geological Survey William T. Pecora, Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Alaska By H. P. Eisenhuth INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow stations in Alaska for which records have been or are to be published in reports of the Geological Survey for periods through September 30, 1967. It supersedes Geological Survey Circular 516. Basic data on surface-water supply of Alaska have been published in bulletins or water-supply papers of the Geological Survey or in reports of other agencies, Water-Supply Paper 1372 contains a summary of monthly and annual discharges through September 1945 for all previously published records, as well as records of daily and monthly discharges for the water years 1946-50 which had not been published previously. For the water years 1951-60, data have been published in water-supply papers as shown in the following list. Water year -WSP Water year -WSP 1951-53. ................. 1466 1958. ...................1570 1959. ...................1640 1960. ................... 1720 Beginning in 1961, theannual seriesof water-supplypapers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year series, the first of which will be fox 1961-65. In order to meet interim.yequirements, beginning in 1961, the Alaska district issues a report annually containing streamflow records for Alaska. In addition to the continuous-record gaging stations, this index includes crest-stage and low-flow partial-record stations, A continuous-record station is a gaging station on a stream or reservoir for which the discharge, stage, or contents is published on a daily, weekly, ormonthly basis for a continuous period of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources Used in Compilation of the Geologic Map of North America
    GSA Data Repository #2005019 Sources Used in Compilation of the Geologic Map of North America This document lists the sources used in the compilation of the Decade of North American Geology Geologic map of North America. Sources used by Reed and Wheeler in the compilation of the on-land geology are listed together and are arranged by political entities or geographic regions, generally from north to south and from west to east. In Canada references are listed by type (general references, regional references, and provincial maps). In the conterminous United States references are listed by regions (Eastern States, Central States, Rocky Mountain states, and Great Basin and Pacific Coast states) and then by groups of states within each region. Sources used by Tucholke in compilation of the seafloor geology are listed separately , and are arranged by map quarter, beginning in the southerastern quarter and proceeding counterclockwise to the southwestern quarter. In each quarter the published sources and the sunpublished sources are listed separately. References that apply to more than one quarter are duplicated in the lists for all of the quarters to which they apply. ON-LAND GEOLOGY General References Fullerton, D. J., Bush, C. A., and Pennell, J. N., Map of surficial deposits and materials in the eastern and central United States: U. S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations Map I-2789, scale 1:2,500,000 Global volcanism program, Smithsonian Institution, 1998, List of Holocene volcanoes; available at www.volcano.si.edu. King, P.B. and Edmonston, G.J., 1972, Generallized tectonic map of North America: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-688, scale 1:5,000,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Seward Peninsula RAC Transcript Volume 1 Winter 2020
    SEWARD PENINSULA SUBSISTENCE RAC MEETING 3/11/2020 SEWARD PENINSULA RAC MEETING 1 SEWARD PENINSULA FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL MEETING PUBLIC MEETING VOLUME I Nome Mini-Convention Center Nome, Alaska March 11, 2020 9:07 a.m. Members Present: Tom Gray, Acting Chairman Deahl Katchatag Ronald Kirk Lloyd Kiyutelluk Leland Oyoumick Charles Saccheus Elmer Seetot Regional Council Coordinator -Tom Kron (Acting) Karen Deatherage/phone Recorded and transcribed by: Computer Matrix Court Reporters, LLC 135 Christensen Drive, Suite 2 Anchorage, AK 99501 907-227-5312; [email protected] Computer Matrix, LLC Phone: 907-243-0668 135 Christensen Dr., Ste. 2., Anch. AK 99501 Fax: 907-243-1473 SEWARD PENINSULA SUBSISTENCE RAC MEETING 3/11/2020 SEWARD PENINSULA RAC MEETING 1 Page 2 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 3 (Nome, Alaska - 3/11/2020) 4 5 (On record) 6 7 ACTING CHAIR GRAY: If I could get 8 everybody to stand I'd appreciate it. Take your hat 9 off. So I'm going to give the invocation. 10 11 (Invocation) 12 13 ACTING CHAIR GRAY: Thank you. Okay, 14 so I'm going to call the meeting to order so we're 15 official. And I get to be the guy running the meeting. 16 Louis is -- he called me from Ruby yesterday saying 17 they're stuck -- they're not stuck, they're actually 18 moving again but him and his brother and nieces and so 19 on and so forth are driving snowmachines to Nome from 20 somewhere, and it's taken longer than they expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Imuruk Lake Quartz Creek
    T 165°0'0"W 164°0'0"W 163°0'0"W 162°0'0"W Clifford Creek Rex Creek SImnmitha cChrueke kRiver Deering I Goodnews Bay Sullivan Creek Cripple River Sullivan Bluffs Deering Ninemile Point Alder Creek Francis Creek Sullivan Lake Grayling Creek Reindeer Creek Hunter Creek Willow Bay Kirk Creek Kiwalik CamWpill oCwre Cekreek Kugruk Lagoon Minnehaha Creek Lone Butte Creek Eagle Creek Virginia Creek Kugruk River 66°0'0"N Iowa Creek Kiwalik Lagoon Pot Creek Inmachuk River Lava Creek Richmond Creek Wabash Creek A 66°0'0"N May Creek Mud Channel Creek Iron Creek Mystic Creek Middle Channel Kiwalk River Humbolt Creek North Channel Kiwalk River Cue Creek Mud Creek Moonlight Creek Mud Creek Ditch Kiwalik River West Creek Washington Creek Oregon Creek Snowshoe Creek Hoodlum Creek Polar Bear Creek California Creek Snow Creek CandleCandle Candle Creek Hot Springs CreekSchlitz Creek Cunningham CreekMilroy Creek Mystery Creek Jump Creek Portage Creek R Bryan Creek Ballarat Creek Fink Creek Contact Creek Teller Creek Inmmachuck River Chicago Creek Collins Creek Chicago Creek Fink Creek Limestone Creek Arizona Creek Burnt River Diamond Creek Foster, Mount Logan Gulch Hannum Creek Pinnell River Short Creek Grouse Creek Mukluk Creek Eureka CreekEureka Gulch First Chance Creek Willow Creek Old Glory Creek Reindeer Creek Lincoln Creek Rain Gulch Serpentine Hot Springs Wallin Coal Mine Camp 19 Patterson Creek Snow Gulch Fox Creek Nelson Creek Dacy Gulch T American Creek Lava Creek Bella Creek Little Daisy Creek Goldbug Creek Blank Creek Dick Creek Reindeer Creek
    [Show full text]
  • The Kougarok-Region
    THE KOUGAROK-REGION. By ALFRED EL BROOKS. INTRODUCTION. "Kougarok district" is the name" generally given to an auriferous gravel region lying in the central part of Seward Peninsula and drained, for the most part, by Kougarok River. This paper will describe, besides the drainage basin of the Kougarok, the other gold- bearing streams tributary to Kuzitrin River. Investigations were begun in this field in 1900 by the writer,6 assisted by A. J. Collier, soon after the first actual discovery of workable placers, and were extended by Mr. Collier 0 in the following year. In 1903 the district was reexamined by Messrs. Collier and Hess, who prepared a state­ ment for a report not yet in print.d The writer was again in this field in 1906, spending about ten days in visiting some of the more important localities. The notes of Messrs. Collier and Hess have been freely drawn upon, but for the conclusions here advanced the writer is alone responsible. All of the surveys thus far made have been preliminary, and the data obtained leave much to be desired, both as to the details of the geology and the distribution of the placer gold. TOPOGRAPHY. The northwestern front of the Bendeleben Mountains slopes off to a lowland basin, 20 miles long and 10 miles wide. On the southwest the basin walls gradually approach each other and finally constrict the valley to a width of about 3 miles, but 10 miles below it opens out again to fche low ground encircling the east end of Imuruk Basin, or Salt Lake, as it is popularly called.
    [Show full text]
  • We Specialize in Residential Remodeling Mike Ness 451-0632 17508579-9-21-14 Building Alaska Since 1977 • We’Ll Be Here Next Year! F17513125
    Sunday, March 8, 2015 Fairbanks Daily News-Miner M11 IDITAROD 2015 The Iditarod trail CHECKPOINT DISTANCES Fairbanks to Nenana 60 miles Nenana to Manley 90 miles Manley to Tanana 66 miles Tanana to Ruby 119miles Ruby to Galena 50 miles Galena to Huslia 82 miles Huslia to Koyukuk 86 miles Koyukuk to Nulato 22 miles Nulato to Kaltag 47 miles Kaltag to Unalakleet 85 miles to 40 miles ushers and dog teams in this year’s Unalakleet Shaktoolik MIditarod will be passing through some of the remot- Shaktoolik to Koyuk 50 miles est communities in Alaska. They’ll be seeing com- Koyuk to Elim 48 miles munities rich in Alaska history and Alaska Native culture. Elim to White Mountain 46 miles Below is some basic information about each of these check- White Mountain to Safety 55 miles points, with an emphasis on those communities called into Safety to Nome 22 miles service for this year’s unusual Iditarod reroute. CHECKPOINT SNAPSHOTS FAIRBANKS: Iditarod racers will established around 1867, a trading leaving Shaktoolik, population start in Fairbanks for the second post around 1880, and a gold rush 258, mushers must travel onto the time in the race’s 43-year history struck between 1884-85. Measles ice of Norton Bay, a treacherous this year. Fairbanks also hosted and food shortages reduced section of trail. Shaktoolik became the Iditarod restart in 2003. The the traditional Alaska Native an occupied settlement as early second-largest population center population by about one-third in as 1839 and the village was in Alaska, the Fairbanks North Star 1900.
    [Show full text]