Census of South Australian Vascular Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Census of South Australian Vascular Plants Census of South Australian Vascular Plants Edition 5.00 Edited by Bill Barker, Robyn Barker, John Jessop & Helen Vonow State Herbarium of South Australia Botanic Gardens of Adelaide & State Herbarium 18 March 2005 Fig. Regions of South Australia adopted by the State Herbarium for organising its collection and use in this Census. Citation Barker, W.R., R.M.Barker, J.P. Jessop & H.P. Vonow (Eds.) (2005). Census of South Australian Vascular Plants. 5th Edition. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. Supplement 1. (Botanic Gardens of Adelaide & State Herbarium: Adelaide). ISBN 0 7590 0092 1 This publication is the first of a Supplementary Series of the Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Gardens. © The Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Government of South Australia © Department for Environment & Heritage, Government of South Australia Cover Illustration by Gilbert Dashorst of Hibbertia paeninsularis Toelken, endemic to South Australia’s gulf region. The species was described in 2002 by Dr Hellmut Toelken in the Journal of the Adelaide Botanic Gardens in a paper clarifying several species complexes in the State. Dr Toelken is well-advanced in a revision of Hibbertia in Australia and surrounding regions. Artist and botanist are staff members of the State Herbarium. Census of South Australian Vascular Plants edn. 5.00 19 Census of South Australian Vascular Plants Dedication To the generations of collectors of herbarium specimens without whom the growth of knowledge of plants could not be achieved. Final data modification on: Tuesday 1 March 2005 10:30 AM Pteridophyta 71.000 PSILOTACEAE 71.001 Psilotum nudum (L.)P.Beauv. (Endangered status in SA) – SL - Lycopodium nudum L. LYCOPODIACEAE 72.001 Lycopodiella lateralis (R.Br.)B.Ollg. (Rare status in SA) – SL KI - Lycopodium laterale R.Br. Lycopodiella serpentina (Kunze)B.Ollg. (Endangered status in SA) – SL - Lycopodium serpentinum Kunze - Lycopodium drummondii Spring Lycopodium deuterodensum Herter (Endangered status in SA) – SL - Lycopodium densum Labill. Phylloglossum drummondii Kunze (Rare status in SA) – MU SL KI SE ISOETACEAE 72.002 Isoetes drummondii A.Braun ssp. anomala C.R.Marsden & Chinnock – SL SE Isoetes drummondii A.Braun ssp. drummondii (Rare status in SA) – NL MU SL KI SE Isoetes muelleri A.Braun – NW LE FR EA EP SL SE - Isoetes humilior auct.non F.Muell. ex A.Braun: J.H.Willis(1962) SELAGINELLACEAE 72.003 Selaginella gracillima (Kunze)Alston – SL KI SE - Lycopodium gracillimum Kunze - Selaginella preissiana Spring * Selaginella kraussiana (Kunze)A.Braun – SL* - Lycopodium kraussianum Kunze GLEICHENIACEAE 74.003 Gleichenia microphylla R.Br. (Rare status in SA) – SL KI SE - Gleichenia circinata auct.non Sw.: J.M.Black(1943) OPHIOGLOSSACEAE 74.005 Botrychium australe R.Br. (Endangered status in SA) – SL Ophioglossum lusitanicum L. – NW LE NU GT FR EA EP NL MU YP SL KI SE - Ophioglossum coriaceum A.Cunn. - Ophioglossum lusitanicum L. ssp. coriaceum (A.Cunn.)R.T.Clausen Ophioglossum polyphyllum A.Braun (Rare status in SA) – NW LE GT FR EA OSMUNDACEAE 74.006 Todea barbara (L.)T.Moore (Endangered status in SA) – SL - Acrostichum barbarum L. - Osmunda barbara (L.)Thunb. - Todea africana Willd. SCHIZAEACEAE 74.009 Schizaea bifida Willd. (Vulnerable status in SA) – SL SE - Schizaea asperula N.A.Wakef. Schizaea fistulosa Labill. (Vulnerable status in SA) – SL KI SE … ?e, questionably established. n*, native and naturalised present. x, extinct, ?x, questionably so. ?id, questionable identification. (BS), Biological Survey record. SCHIZAEACEAE 74.009 20 Census of South Australian Vascular Plants edn. 5.00 CYATHEACEAE 74.012 * Cyathea cooperi (Hook. ex F.Muell)Domin – SL* - Alsophila cooperi Hook. ex F.Muell. DICKSONIACEAE 74.014 Dicksonia antarctica Labill. (Endangered status in SA) – ?SLx ?SEx DENNSTAEDTIACEAE 74.015 Dennstaedtia davallioides (R.Br.)T.Moore (Endangered status in SA) – SE - Dicksonia davallioides R.Br. Histiopteris incisa (Thunb.)J.Sm. (Endangered status in SA) – FR SL KI SE - Pteris incisa Thunb. * Hypolepis dicksonioides (Endl.)Hook. – SL* - Hypolepis punctata auct.non (Thunb.)Mett. ex Kuhn: Chinnock(1978) - Cheilanthes dicksonioides Endl. Hypolepis rugosula (Labill.)J.Sm. (Rare status in SA) – SL KI SE - Polypodium rugosulum Labill. * Pteridium aquilinum (L.)Kuhn – SL* - Pteris aquilina L. Pteridium esculentum (G.Forst.)Cockayne – EP NL MU SL KI SE - Pteris esculenta G.Forst. - Pteridium aquilinum auct.non (L.)Kuhn: J.M.Black(1943), partly LINDSAEACEAE 74.016 Lindsaea linearis Sw. – SL KI SE ADIANTACEAE 74.018 Adiantum aethiopicum L. – FR EP MU SL KI SE Adiantum capillus-veneris L. (Vulnerable status in SA) – MU YP SL SE Anogramma leptophylla (L.)Link (Rare status in SA) – ?NW FR EP NL SL KI SE - Polypodium leptophyllum L. Cheilanthes austrotenuifolia H.M.Quirk & T.C.Chambers – FR EP NL MU YP SL KI SE - Cheilanthes tenuifolia auct.non (Burm.f)Sw.: Chinnock(1978) Cheilanthes distans (R.Br.)Mett. – FR EA EP NL MU SL SE - Notholaena distans R.Br. Cheilanthes lasiophylla Pic.Serm. – NW LE NU GT FR EA EP NL MU SL - Notholaena brownii auct.non Desv.: J.M.Black(1943) Cheilanthes sieberi Kunze ssp. pseudovellea H.M.Quirk & T.C.Chambers – NW LE EP - Cheilanthes vellea auct.non (R.Br.)F.Muell.: Chinnock(1978), partly Cheilanthes sieberi Kunze ssp. sieberi – NW LE GT FR EA EP MU YP SL SE - Cheilanthes tenuifolia (Burm.f.)Sw. ssp. sieberi (Kunze)Domin - Cheilanthes clelandii F.Muell. & Tate Paraceterach reynoldsii (F.Muell.)Tindale – NW FR EA - Grammitis reynoldsii (F.Muell.)Benth. - Gymnogramma reynoldsii (F.Muell.)J.M.Black - Gymnogramme reynoldsii (F.Muell.)J.M.Black - Nothochlaena reynoldsii F.Muell. - Notholaena reynoldsii F.Muell. PTERIDACEAE 74.023 Pteris tremula R.Br. (Rare status in SA) – FR EP MU YP SL SE BLECHNACEAE 74.027 Blechnum chambersii Tindale (Endangered status in SA) – SE - Blechnum aggregatum auct.non (Colenso)Tindale: H.Eichler(1965) - Blechnum lanceolatum (R.Br.)J.W.Sturm - Stegania lanceolata R.Br. Blechnum minus (R.Br.)Ettingsh. – SL SE - Blechnum capense auct.non (L.)Schltdl.: J.M.Black(1943), partly - Stegania minor R.Br. Blechnum nudum (Labill.)Mett. ex Luerss. (Rare status in SA) – SL KI - Blechnum discolor auct.non (G.Forst.)Keys: J.M.Black(1943), partly Region prefix: ?, doubtful occurrence. Region suffixes: [lacking superscript flag], native; ?n, questionably native. *, naturalised; … CYATHEACEAE 74.012 Census of South Australian Vascular Plants edn. 5.00 21 - Onoclea nuda Labill. Blechnum wattsii Tindale (Rare status in SA) – SL KI SE - Blechnum capense auct.non (L.)Schltdl.: J.M.Black(1943), partly - Blechnum procerum auct.non (Forster f.)Sw.: H.Eichler(1965) Doodia caudata (Cav.)R.Br. (Endangered status in SA) – FR - Woodwardia caudata Cav. DRYOPTERIDACEAE 74.028 * Cyrtomium falcatum (L.f.)C.Presl – SL* SE* - Polypodium falcatum L.f. Lastreopsis acuminata (Houlston)C.V.Morton (Endangered status in SA) – SE - Lastrea acuminata Houlston - Aspidium shepherdii Kunze ex Mett. - Lastreopsis shepherdii (Kunze ex Mett.)Tindale Polystichum proliferum (R.Br.)C.Presl (Endangered status in SA) – ?SE - Aspidium proliferum R.Br. - Polystichum aculeatum auct.non (L.)Schott.: J.M.Black(1943) ASPLENIACEAE 74.029 Asplenium bulbiferum G.Forst. ssp. gracillimum (Col.)Brownsey (Endangered status in SA) – SE Asplenium flabellifolium Cav. – FR NL MU SL KI SE - Asplenium flavelifolium Cav. Asplenium trichomanes L. (Rare status in SA) – EP YP SE Pleurosorus rutifolius (R.Br.)Fee – NW LE GT FR EA EP NL MU SL KI SE - Pleurosorus rutaefolius (R.Br.)Fee - Grammitis rutaefolia R.Br. Pleurosorus subglandulosus (Hook. & Grev.)Tindale – NW FR EA EP NL MU - Gymnogramma subglandulosa Hook. & Grev. THELYPTERIDACEAE 74.032 Christella dentata (Forssk.)Brownsey & Jermy (Rare status in SA) – FR EP MU - Cyclosorus parasiticus auct.non (L.)Farwell: H.Eichler(1965) - Dryopteris parasitica auct.non (L.)O.Kuntze: J.M.Black(1943) - Polypodium dentatum Forssk. MARSILEACEAE 74.040 Marsilea costulifera D.L.Jones – LE GT FR NL MU KI SE - Marsilea sp. Chinnock (1986) - Marsilea angustifolia auct.non R.Br.: J.H.Willis(1962) Marsilea drummondii A.Braun – NW LE GT FR EA EP NL MU YP SL SE - Marsilea elata A.Braun var. crenata A.Braun Marsilea exarata A.Braun – NW LE GT Marsilea hirsuta R.Br. – LE GT FR EA EP NL MU SL KI * Marsilea mutica Mett. – MU?nx?id SL?n Pilularia novae-hollandiae A.Braun (Rare status in SA) – FR EP NL MU SL KI SE AZOLLACEAE 74.041 Azolla filiculoides Lam. – LE MU SL SE - Azolla filiculoides Lam. var. rubra (R.Br.)Strasb. - Azolla rubra R.Br. Azolla pinnata R.Br. – MU SL SE SALVINIACEAE 74.042 ?e Salvinia molesta D.S.Mitch. (Proclaimed SA Plant) – EP?e Spermatophyta: Gymnospermae 84.000 PINACEAE 84.002 * Pinus canariensis C.Smith – MU* SL* SE* * Pinus halepensis Mill. (Proclaimed SA Plant) – FR* EP* MU* YP* SL* * Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold – SL* SE* - Pinus sylvestris L. var. maritima Aiton * Pinus pinaster Aiton – MU* KI* … ?e, questionably established. n*, native and naturalised present. x, extinct, ?x, questionably so. ?id, questionable identification. (BS), Biological Survey record. PINACEAE 84.002 22 Census of South Australian Vascular Plants edn. 5.00 - Pinus maritima Lam. * Pinus ponderosa Douglas – MU* ?SL* * Pinus radiata D.Don – NL* SL* KI* SE* CUPRESSACEAE 84.004 Callitris canescens (Parl.)S.T.Blake – EP NL MU YP KI SE - Callitris drummondii auct.non (Parl.)F.Muell.: J.M.Black(1943) - Callitris morrisonii R.T.Baker - Frenela canescens Parl. Callitris glaucophylla Joy Thomps. & L.A.S.Johnson – NW LE NU GT FR EA EP NL MU - Callitris columellaris auct.non F.Muell.: Venning(1986) - Callitris glauca R.Br. ex R.T.Baker & H.G.Sm. - Frenela robusta A.Cunn. ex Mirb. var. microcarpa Benth. Callitris gracilis R.T.Baker – FR EA EP NL MU YP SL KI SE - Callitris preissii Miq. , partly - Callitris propinqua R.Br. ex R.T.Baker & H.G.Sm. - Callitris preissii Miq. ssp. murrayensis J.Garden - Callitris robusta R.Br. ex R.T.Baker & H.G.Sm.
Recommended publications
  • Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
    Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Majura Ainslie Plant List.Xlsx
    Plant Species List for Mount Majura and Mount Ainslie, Canberra Base data from Ingwerson, F; O. Evans & B. Griffiths. (1974). Vegetation of the Ainslie-Majura Reserve . Conservation Series No. 2. AGPS Canberra. Re-organised, revised and updated by Michael Doherty, CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences and Waltraud Pix, Friends of Mt. Majura With advice from Isobel Crawford, Australian Botanical Surveys Current version of 01.10.2020 Names: Census of Plants of the Australian Capital Territory, Version 4.1, 2019 Enquiries:Version 3.0 [email protected] (8th June 2012) subsp. = subspecies Form ? = questionable status or identity f = herb, forb sp. aff. = having close affinities with i.e. similar but not quite the sameo = herb, orchid syn. = synonymous with i.e. most recent previous name, or alternativeg = nameherb, grass sens. lat. = in the broad sense of the species concept gl = herb, grass- or sedge-like var. = variety s = shrub (including creeper and climber) sp. = species i.e. identity yet to be finalised st = shrub / small tree spp. = species in the plural i.e. more than one species t = tree MM Mount Majura. Notionally north of “Blue Metal” Road; MA Mount Ainslie. Notionally south of “Blue Metal” Road (VVV) Species occurrence checking; currently focused on Mt. Majura rather than Mt. Ainslie. No ticks next to name = species reported but not yet confirmed for Mt Majura and Mt Ainslie. Status is locally native except for: PE = Planted Exotic PN = Planted Non-local Native WE = Weed Exotic WN = Weed Non-local Native ‘Planted’ status refers to individuals which are planted but not spreading ‘Weed’ status refers to species reproducing in the wild Scientific name Common name MM MA Status Form Family Isolepis sp .
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Loranthaceae1
    Flora of South Australia 5th Edition | Edited by Jürgen Kellermann LORANTHACEAE1 P.J. Lang2 & B.A. Barlow3 Aerial hemi-parasitic shrubs on branches of woody plants attached by haustoria; leaves mostly opposite, entire. Inflorescence terminal or lateral; flowers bisexual; calyx reduced to an entire, lobed or toothed limb at the apex of the ovary, without vascular bundles; corolla free or fused, regular or slightly zygomorphic, 4–6-merous, valvate; stamens as many as and opposite the petals, epipetalous, anthers 2- or 4-locular, mostly basifixed, immobile, introrse and continuous with the filament but sometimes dorsifixed and then usually versatile, opening by longitudinal slits; pollen trilobate; ovary inferior, without differentiated locules or ovules. Fruit berry-like; seed single, surrounded by a copious viscous layer. Mistletoes. 73 genera and around 950 species widely distributed in the tropics and south temperate regions with a few species in temperate Asia and Europe. Australia has 12 genera (6 endemic) and 75 species. Reference: Barlow (1966, 1984, 1996), Nickrent et al. (2010), Watson (2011). 1. Petals free 2. Anthers basifixed, immobile, introrse; inflorescence axillary 3. Inflorescence not subtended by enlarged bracts more than 20 mm long ....................................... 1. Amyema 3: Inflorescence subtended by enlarged bracts more than 20 mm long which enclose the buds prior to anthesis ......................................................................................................................... 2. Diplatia 2: Anthers dorsifixed, versatile; inflorescence terminal ........................................................................... 4. Muellerina 1: Petals united into a curved tube, more deeply divided on the concave side ................................................ 3. Lysiana 1. AMYEMA Tiegh. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 41: 499 (1894). (Greek a-, negative; myeo, I instruct, initiate; referring to the genus being not previously recognised; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Untangling Phylogenetic Patterns and Taxonomic Confusion in Tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with Special Focus on Generic
    TAXON 67 (1) • February 2018: 83–112 Madhani & al. • Phylogeny and taxonomy of Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) Untangling phylogenetic patterns and taxonomic confusion in tribe Caryophylleae (Caryophyllaceae) with special focus on generic boundaries Hossein Madhani,1 Richard Rabeler,2 Atefeh Pirani,3 Bengt Oxelman,4 Guenther Heubl5 & Shahin Zarre1 1 Department of Plant Science, Center of Excellence in Phylogeny of Living Organisms, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6455, Tehran, Iran 2 University of Michigan Herbarium-EEB, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-2228, U.S.A. 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P.O. Box 91775-1436, Mashhad, Iran 4 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden 5 Biodiversity Research – Systematic Botany, Department of Biology I, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Menzinger Str. 67, 80638 München, Germany; and GeoBio Center LMU Author for correspondence: Shahin Zarre, [email protected] DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/671.6 Abstract Assigning correct names to taxa is a challenging goal in the taxonomy of many groups within the Caryophyllaceae. This challenge is most serious in tribe Caryophylleae since the supposed genera seem to be highly artificial, and the available morphological evidence cannot effectively be used for delimitation and exact determination of taxa. The main goal of the present study was to re-assess the monophyly of the genera currently recognized in this tribe using molecular phylogenetic data. We used the sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the chloroplast gene rps16 for 135 and 94 accessions, respectively, representing all 16 genera currently recognized in the tribe Caryophylleae, with a rich sampling of Gypsophila as one of the most heterogeneous groups in the tribe.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Europe's Threatened Plants
    Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Conserving Europe’s threatened plants Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation By Suzanne Sharrock and Meirion Jones May 2009 Recommended citation: Sharrock, S. and Jones, M., 2009. Conserving Europe’s threatened plants: Progress towards Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation Botanic Gardens Conservation International, Richmond, UK ISBN 978-1-905164-30-1 Published by Botanic Gardens Conservation International Descanso House, 199 Kew Road, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3BW, UK Design: John Morgan, [email protected] Acknowledgements The work of establishing a consolidated list of threatened Photo credits European plants was first initiated by Hugh Synge who developed the original database on which this report is based. All images are credited to BGCI with the exceptions of: We are most grateful to Hugh for providing this database to page 5, Nikos Krigas; page 8. Christophe Libert; page 10, BGCI and advising on further development of the list. The Pawel Kos; page 12 (upper), Nikos Krigas; page 14: James exacting task of inputting data from national Red Lists was Hitchmough; page 16 (lower), Jože Bavcon; page 17 (upper), carried out by Chris Cockel and without his dedicated work, the Nkos Krigas; page 20 (upper), Anca Sarbu; page 21, Nikos list would not have been completed. Thank you for your efforts Krigas; page 22 (upper) Simon Williams; page 22 (lower), RBG Chris. We are grateful to all the members of the European Kew; page 23 (upper), Jo Packet; page 23 (lower), Sandrine Botanic Gardens Consortium and other colleagues from Europe Godefroid; page 24 (upper) Jože Bavcon; page 24 (lower), Frank who provided essential advice, guidance and supplementary Scumacher; page 25 (upper) Michael Burkart; page 25, (lower) information on the species included in the database.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park
    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • THE AUSTRALIAN GENUS GUNNIOPSIS PAX R. J. Chinnock
    J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 6(2): 133-179 (1983) THE AUSTRALIAN GENUS GUNNIOPSIS PAX (AIZ OACEAE) R. J. Chinnock State Herbarium of South Australia, Botanic Gardens, North Terrace, Adelaide, 5000 Abstract Gunniopsis, which includes all Australian species previously included in Aizoon L. and Neogunnia Fax & Hoffm., is revised. Fourteen species are recognised and G. calcarea, G. calva, G. divisa, G. papillata, G. propin qua, G. rubra and G. tenuifolia are described as new. Two new combinations, G. kochii and G. septifraga are made. All species are illustrated and distribution maps and ecological data are provided. Gunniopsis is compared with Aizoon L. and Aizoanthemum Dinter ex Friedr., two African genera with which Gunniopsis has previously been compared or considered synonymous. Pollen, capsule and seed characters are discussed and illustrated. The majority of Gunniopsis species appear to be protandrous outcrossers, while a few are autogamous. Introduction The Australian species which have been previously referred to the genera Aizoon L., Gunniopsis Pax, Gunnia F. Muell. and Neogunnia Pax & Hoffmann are small succulent shrubs or herbs which are widespread throughout the eremaean zones of Western and South Australia with a few species extending into the adjacent portions of the Northern Territory, Queensland and New South Wales. With the exception of the shrubby Gunniopsis quadrifida which is very widespread and an important component of succulent shrublands in many areas, especially on saline soils in salt lake systems, most of the species have been poorly understood taxonomically. Doubt over the exact number of species found in Western Australia, for example, has resulted in considerable confusion. Gardner in his 1930 census listed six species under Gunniopsis and Gunnia, Blackall & Grieve (1954) included four under Gunniopsis and Gunnia while Green (1981) listed five under Aizoon, Gunniopsis and Neogunnia.
    [Show full text]
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Clearing Permit Decision Report
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 2986/3 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: Paddington Gold Pty Ltd 1.3. Property details Property: Mining Lease 26/446 Local Government Area: City of Kalgoorlie-Boulder Colloquial name: Janet Ivy Project 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 200 Mechanical Removal Mineral Production 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 29 June 2017 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description Beard vegetation associations have been mapped for the whole of Western Australia and are useful to look at vegetation in a regional context. The following Beard vegetation associations have been mapped within the application area (GIS Database): 9: Medium woodland; Coral gum ( Eucalyptus torquata ) and Goldfields blackbutt ( Eucalyptus lesouefii ); and 468: Medium woodland; Salmon gum & Goldfields blackbutt. A flora and vegetation survey of the Janet Ivy area, including the application area, was conducted in September 2005 and recorded the following five vegetation types (Jims Seeds, Weeds and Trees, 2006): (1) Eucalyptus lesouefii woodland with an understorey of Ptilotus obovatus , Alyxia buxifolia and Olearia muelleri , Halgania andromedifolia , Senna artemisioides subsp artemisioides , Casuarina pauper , Atriplex codonocarpa , Maireana brevifolia , Cratystylis microphylla , Scaevola spinescens , Acacia hemiteles , Eremophila glabra subsp. glabra , Pittosporum angustifolium , Melaleuca sheathiana , Exocarpos aphyllus and Alectryon oleifolius ; (2) Eucalyptus woodland over spinifex, comprising dominant Eucalyptus gracilis and E. oleosa over Triodia scariosa ; (3) Acacia acuminata and Allocasuarina helmsii over spinifex ( Triodia scariosa ), Alyxia buxifolia , Olearia muelleri , Senna artemisioides subsp.
    [Show full text]