Federal Register Volume 31 • Number 112
FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 31 • NUMBER 112
Friday, June 10,1966 • Washington, D.C. • ; Pages 8171-8205
Agencies in this issue— Agency for International Development Agriculture Department Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Consumer and Marketing Service Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Forest Service Interior Department Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau Securities and Exchange Commission State Department Tariff Commission Treasury Department Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Just Released
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
(As of January 1, 1966)
Title 41—Public Contracts and Property Management (Chapter 101-End) (Revised) $1.25
Title 42—Public Health (Pocket Supplement) $1.00
Title 43—Public Lands: Interior (Revised) $2.50
Title 45—Public Welfare (Pocket Supplement) $1.50
tA cumulative checklist of CFR issuances for 1966 appears in the first issue of the Federal Register each month under Title 11
Order from Superintendent of Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402
Piiblishcd daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, M ondays, or FEDERAL®REGISTER on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, N ational Area Code 202 \ «'MTEO^ '»»» Phone 963-3261 A rchies and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address N ational a!6! W^hington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in. the Federal Register Act, approved July 20, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, asjunended; o u ^ u eu ; **44 U.S.C.,u.o.u., crch. 8B), under regulations prescribed by the Admin- istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch I) Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. - - . - * The F ederal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 ner month or AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL Proposed Rule Making FOREST SERVICE Transition areas; proposed altera Rules and Regulations DEVELOPMENT tions (2 documents)------8183 Notices Transition area and control area Timber; awards of advertised timber______8180 Assistant Administrator for Ad extension; proposed alteration ministration; delegation of au and revocation------— 8182 Notices thority------r 8186 San Gabriel Wilderness; notice of Mizrachi Women’s Organization FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS proposal and hearing announce of America, Inc.; register as vol ment______8185 untary foreign aid agency—— 8186 COMMISSION Notices INTERIOR DEPARTMENT AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Canadian Broadcast Stations; list See also Consumer and Marketing of changes, proposed changes, See Land Management Bureau. Service; Federal Crop Insurance and corrections in assignments- 8195 Corporation; Forest Service. Hearings, etc.: INTERSTATE COMMERCE Rules and Regulations Lunde Corp., and KASI Iowa, > Inc______— ------—------8196 COMMISSION Nondiscrimination; complaints— 8175 Olmstead County Broadcasting Notices Co., and North Central Video, Notices Texas; extension of designation of Inc______8196 Fourth section applications for areas for emergency loans------8185 Reising, Keith L. and Kentuck- relief______8203 iana Television, Inc— ----- — 8197 Motor carrier transfer proceed CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD ings (2 documents)------8203 Notices FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Hearings, etc.: CORPORATION LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU Alaska Airlines, Inc------:•— 8194 Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making International Air Transport Barley crop insurance; discontin Association______8194 Mineral leases, permits and li uance in counties previously censes; miscellaneous amend Trans International Airlines, designated------—------8175 Inc______8194 ments______-,------8181 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION FEDERAL MARITIME SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Rules and Regulations COMMISSION COMMISSION Excepted service; Notices Notices Federal Aviation Agency_____ 8175 Agreements filed for approval: Navy Department______- 8175 Asia Africa Shipping Co., Ltd., Pennzoil Co.; notice of filing re- , and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, garding renewal and extension CONSUMER AND MARKETING Ltd— ______— ------—— 8201 of notes to banks______8186 SERVICE Howard Terminal and Learner Co______8200 STATE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations N.V. Nedlloyd Lijnen and Hoegh Carrots grown in south Texas; Lines Joint Service— ______- 8201 See Agency for International De order terminating marketing Oceanic Forwarding Co., et al__ 8200 velopment. agreement and order______8178 Kimbrell-Lawrence Transporta Nectarines grown in California tion, Inc., et al.; notice of in TARIFF COMMISSION (2 documents)______8176, 8177 vestigation------8201 Plums grown in California; regu Outward Continental North Pacific Notices lation by grade and size______8177 Freight Conference; order to Steel jacks from Canada; notice of Proposed Rule Making show cause______8198 hearing ------8185 Avocados grown in south Florida; expenses and rate of assess FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION TREASURY DEPARTMENT ment______8181 Notices Notices Hearings, etc.: Rules and Regulations Union Stock Yards Company of Atlantic Seaboard Corp------8202 Transactions in foreign exchange, Omaha (Ltd.); petition for Wisconsin Gas Co., and Mich transfers of credit and export modification of rate order_____ 8185 igan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. of coin and currency______— 8179 (3 documents)______8202, 8203 Notices fed er a l a v ia t io n a g e n c y Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., et Rules and Regulations FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ''al.; companies holding certifi Controlled . airspace; revocation Notices cates of authority as acceptable end alteration ______8178 Otto Bremer Co.; amended notice sureties on Federal bonds and Federal airways; alteration_____ 8179 of request for determination and as acceptable reinsuring com ■Transition area; alteration_____ 8179 order for hearing____ *______8195 panies ______8187 8173 8174 CONTENTS - List of CFR Parts Affected (Codification Guide) The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each tide of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections anected by documents published since January 1, 1966, and specifies how they are affected. 5 CFR 213 (2 documents)______,____ 8175 7 CFR 15------______8175 401------i 8175 916 (2 documents)______8176, 8177 917------8177 970------8178 P roposed R u les: 915------____------8181 14 CFR 71 (3 documents)______8178, 8179 P roposed R ules : 71 (3 documents)______8182, 8183 31 CFR 128------______------8179 36 CFR 221—------.___ 8180 43 CFR P roposed R u les: 3130______8181 3140______8181 3150______8181 3160______. 8181 3180______8181 8175 Rules and Regulations Effective on publication in the F ederal immediately furnish a notice and a Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE R egister, paragraph (a) of § 213.3357 is factual report thereof to the Secretary amended as set out below. in accordance with procedures estab lished by each agency. Each action PERSONNEL § 213.3357 Federal Aviation Agency. taken on any such complaint shall like Chapter I— Civil Service Commission (a) One Assistant to the Chief, Conwise be reported to the Secretary . • gressional Relations Division. (c) Any complaint authorized by PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE ***** paragraph (a) of this section involving matters within the responsibility of an Department of the Navy (R.S. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; 5 TJ.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, 3 agency which has no complaint or ap Section 213.3108 is amended to show CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) peal procedure established by law or regulations, may be filed directly with that the name of the U.S. Medical Re U nited S tates Civil S erv search Institute has been changed to the Secretary of Agriculture. Any such ice Commission, Naval Medical Research Institute, and complaint filed with any agency of the [ seal] M ary V. W enzel, that the number of scientific and pro Department not having responsibility Executive Assistant to therefor shall be forwarded to the ap fessional resident research associate the Commissioners. positions excepted under Schedule A at propriate agency or to the Secretary. the Naval Medical Research Institute [F.R. Doc. 66-6380; Filed, June 9, 1966; (d) The investigative function with has been increased from 5 to 10, and 8:47 am .] respect to complaints authorized by that the new limitation is on the num paragraph (a) of this section shall be ber of appointments that may be made discharged by the Office of the Inspector in any calendar year rather than on the General in the manner determined by number of positions that may be filled Title 7— AGRICULTURE the Inspector General. at any one time. Effective on publica Subtitle A— Office of the Secretary of Effective date. This revision of § 15.52 tion in the F ederal R egister, paragraph Agriculture to Subpart B, Part 15, Subtitle A, Title (g) of § 213.3108 is amended as set out 7 CFR, shall become effective upon pub below. PART 15— NONDISCRIMINATION lication in the F ederal R egister. Complaints § 213.3108 Department of the Navy. Dated: June 7, 1966. ***** Subpart B, Part 15, Subtitle A, Title 7 Orville L. F reeman, (g) Naval Medical Research Institute, CFR, § 15.52 is hereby revised to read as Secretary o1 Agriculture. National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, follows: [F.R. Doc. 66-6379; Filed, June 9, 1966; Md. (1) Scientific and professional resi § 15.52 Complaints. dent research associate positions when 8:47 a.m.] filled on a temporary basis by persons (a) Any person who believes himself with doctoral degrees in appropriate bio or any specific class of individuals to be logical or biochemical sciences, or in subjected to discrimination prohibited by Chapter IV— Federal Crop Insurance medicine or related fields of study, for re the regulations in this subpart may by Corporation, Department of Agri search activities of mutual interest to himself or by an authorized representa culture the appointee and to the Institute. tive file a written complaint based on the Not more than 10 appointments per ground of such discrimination. No PART 401— FEDERAL CROP calendar year may be made under this particular form of complaint shall be re INSURANCE exception. No individual may be em quired. The complaint must be filed ployed for more than 1 year under this within 90 days from the date of the Subparf— Regulations for the 1961 exception, except that with prior ap alleged discrimination unless the Secre and Succeeding Crop Years proval of the Commission an appoint tary extends the time for filing. Any person who complains of discrimination Discontinuance of I nsurance in Coun ment may be extended for not more than ties P reviously Designated for B ar shall be advised of his right to file a com one additional year. l e y Crop I nsurance (RS. 1753, sec. 2, 22 Stat. 403, as amended; plaint as herein provided and each 5 U.S.C. 631, 633; E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, 3 agency of the Department dealing with The counties listed below are hereby CRR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) the public shall post in a conspicuous deleted from the list of counties pub place in its office notice of the right to lished in the F ederal R egister on Feb United S tates Civil S erv file a complaint under this subpart. ruary 25,1966 (31 F.R. 3113), which were ice Commission, (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing designated for barley crop insurance for I seal] Mary V. W enzel, provisions of this section, any complaint the 1967 crop year pursuant to the au Executive Assistant to filed hereunder, to the extent that it in thority contained in § 401.1 of the above- the Commissioners. volves a determination, decision or ac identified regulations. |F.R. Doc. 66-6381; Filed, June 9, 1966; tion under a program or activity covered Wisconsin 8:47 am .] by this subpart, shall be handled in ac cordance with the procedures established Dodge. Fond du Lac. by law or regulation of the Department (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE or any of its agencies for the handling of as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) complaints or appeals under such pro Federal Aviation Agency [ seal] J ohn -N. L u ft, gram or activity which are not based on M anager, Section 213.3357 is amended to show grounds of discrimination prohibited by nat one position of Assistant to the this subpart: Provided, That the officer, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. nief, Congressional Relations Division, committee or other employee receiving a [F.R. Doc. 66-6391; Filed, June 9, 1966; no longer excepted under Schedule C. complaint based on discrimination shall 8:48 ajn.] FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8176 RULES AND REGULATIONS Chapter IX— Consumer and Market paid advertising and sales promotion ac subdivision as may be prescribed pur ing Service (Marketing Agreements tivities designed to expand the market suant to § 916.31: and O rd ers; Fruits, Vegetables, and stimulate the sales of nectarines. (a) “District 1” shall include the Nuts), Department of Agriculture Shipment of the 1966 crop of nectarines counties of Madera, Fresno, and Kings are now beginning. Indications are that and that portion of Tulare County north PART 916— NECTARINES GROWN promotional activity in connection there of the 4th Standard Parallel south of the IN CALIFORNIA with may be needed to move the crop Mount Diablo Base Line of the General advantageously. Therefore, this order Land Office. Order Amending Order Regulating should be made effective as soon as prac (b) “District 2” shall include that por Handling ticable so that such promotional activity tion of Tulare County not included in may be considered and such projects as District 1. § 916.0 Findings and determinations. may be indicated by the circumstances '(c) “District 3” shall include all of The findings and determinations here developed in accordance with such pro the production area lying south of the inafter set forth are supplementary and visions. The provisions of this order are northern boundaries of the counties of in addition to the findings and determi well known to producers and handlers. San Luis Obispo, Kern, and San Ber nations made in connection with the is The hearing was held at Fresno, Calif., nardino. suance of the order; and all of said on February 11, 1966, and the recom (d) “District 4” shall include the previous findings and determinations are mended decision and final decision were counties of Merced, Stanislaus, and the hereby ratified and affirmed except inso published in the F ederal R egister on balance of the production area. April 9, 1966 (31 F.R. 5635), and May 10, far as such findings and determinations 2. The provisions of § 916.20 are may be in conflict with the findings and 1966 (31 F.R .'6871), respectively. Copies amended to read as follows: determinations set forth herein. of the text of the amendment to the (a) Findings upon the basis of the order have been made available to all § 916.20 Establishment and member hearing record. Pursuant to the Agri known producers and handlers ; the pro ship. cultural Marketing Agreement Act of visions of this order do not impose any There is hereby established a Nectarine 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), and obligations on handlers until promo Administrative Committee consisting of the applicable rules of practice and pro tional projects are developed in accord eight members, each of whom shall have cedure effective thereunder (7 CFR Part ance therewith; and compliance with an alternate who shall have the same 900), a public hearing was held at Fresno, such provisions will not require advance qualifications as the member for whom Calif., February 11, 1966, upon proposed preparation on the part of persons sub he is an alternate. The members and amendment of the marketing agreement ject thereto which cannot be completed their alternates shall be growers or em and to Order No. 916 (7 CFR Part 916), prior to the effective time of such regu ployees of growers. Five of the mem regulating the handling of nectarines lations. bers and their respective alternates shall grown in California. Upon the basis of (c) Determinations. It is hereby debe producers of nectarines in District 1. the evidence adduced at such hearing termined that: One member and his alternate shall be and the record thereof, it is found that: (1) The “Marketing Agreement, as producers of nectarines in District 2; one (1) The said order, as hereby amend Amended, Regulating the Handling of of the members and his alternate shall be ed, and all of the terms and conditions Nectarines Grown in California,” upon producers of nectarines in District 3; thereof, will tend to effectuate the de which the aforesaid public hearing was and one member and his alternate shall clared policy of the act; held, has been executed by handlers be producers of nectarines in District 4. (2) The said order, as hereby amend (excluding cooperative associations of § 916.22 [Amended] ed, regulates the handling of nectarines producers who are not engaged in proc grown in the production area in the same essing, distributing, or shipping the fruit 3. The last sentence in paragraph (b) manner as, and is applicable only to per covered by this order) who, during the (I) and the last sentence in paragraph sons in the respective classes of commer period March 1, 1965, through February (b) (2) are deleted from § 916.22.1 cial and industrial activity specified in, 28, 1966, handled not less than 50 per § 916.27 [Amended] the marketing agreement and order upon cent of the volume of nectarines covered 4. The last sentence of § 916.27 is de which hearings have been held ; by the said order as hereby amended ; leted and the following substituted there (3) The said order, as hereby amend and for: “In the event both a member of the ed, is limited in its application to the (2) The issuance of this order, amend Committee and his alternate are unable smallest regional production area that is ing the aforesaid order, is favored or ap to attend a committee meeting, the mem practicable consistently with carrying proved by at least two-thirds of the ber or the committee members present out the declared policy of the act; and respective producers who participated in may designate any other alternate to the issuance of several orders applicable a referendum on the question of its ap serve in such member’s place and stead to subdivisions of the production area proval and who, during the determined provided such action is necessary to would not effectively carry out the de representative period (March 1, 1965, secure a quorum.” clared policy of the act; through February 28, 1966), were en (4) There are no differences in the gaged, within the production area speci 5. Paragraph (a) of § 916.32 is revised production and marketing of nectarines fied in the aforesaid amended order, in to read as follows: grown in the production area which the production for market of nectarines; § 916.32 Procedure. make necessary different terms and pro such producers having also produced for visions applicable to different parts of market at least two-thirds of the volume (a) Six members of the committee, or such area; and of nectarines represented in such ref alternates acting for members, shall con (5) All handling of nectarines grown erendum. stitute a quorum and any action of the in the production area is in the current It is, therefore, ordered, That, on and of interstate or foreign commerce or di after the effèctive date hereof, all han 1 These sentences, which were suspended on rectly burdens, obstructs, or affects such dling of nectarines grown in the pro Jan. 15, 1959 (24 F.R. 356) and do not appear commerce. duction area shall be in conformity to, in 7 CFR Part 916, read as follows: (b) Additional findings. It is hereby and in compliance with, the terms and “ (b )(1) * * * Such procedure shall in clude the subdivision of multiple m em ber found, on the basis hereinafter indicated, conditions of the said order as hereby districts into election districts designed to that good cause exists for making the amended as follows: provide equitable distribution of representa provisions of this amendatory order ef 1. The provisions of § 916.12 aretion. fective upon publication in the F ederal amended to read as follows: “ (b) (2) * * * Each such grower, in clu d R egister, ing employees of such grower, shall be en and that it would be contrary § 9 1 6 .1 2 District. to the public interest to postpone such titled to cast but one vote for one nom inee effective time until 30 days after such for member and one vote for one nom inee “District” means the applicable one for alternate member in the district o r elec publication (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011). The of the following described subdivisions tion district in which he produces n ec provisions of this order would authorize of the production area or such other tarines.” FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 8177 committee shall require the concurring (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. Terms used in the marketing agree vote of the majority of those present: 601-674) ment and order shall, when used herein, Provided, That actions of the committee Dated, June 7, 1966, to become effec have the same meaning as is given to the 'respective term in said marketing agree with respect to expenses and assess tive upon publication in the F ederal ment and order, and “standard lug box” ments, or recommendations for regula egister R . shall mean the No. 26 standard lug box tions pursuant to §§ 916.50 to 916.55, J ohn A. S chnittker, shall require at least six concurring votes. Acting Secretary.. set forth in section 828.4 of the Agri cultural Code of California. * * * * * [F.R. Doc. 66-6392; Filed, June 9, 1966; (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 8:48 a.m.) 6. The provisions of § 916.33 are 601-674) amended to read as follows: Dated: June 6, 1966. § 916.33 Expenses and compensation. PART 916— NECTARINES GROWN IN Paul A. Nicholson, The members of the committee, and CALIFORNIA Deputy Director, Fruit and Vegetable Division, Consumer alternates when acting as members, shall Expenses and Rate of Assessment and serve without compensation but shall be and Marketing Service. reimbursed for expenses necessarily in Carryover of Unexpended Funds [F.R. Doc. 66-6377; Filed, June 9, 1966; curred by them in the performance of On May 24, 1966, notice of rule mak 8:47 a.m.] their duties under this part: Provided, ing was published in the F ederal R eg That the committee at its discretion may ister (31 F.R. 7482) regarding proposed [Plum Reg. 7] request the attendance of one or more expenses and the related rate of assess alternates at* any or all meetings not ment for the period beginning March 1, PART 917— FRESH PEARS, PLUMS, withstanding the expected or actual 1966, and ending February 28, 1967, pur AND PEACHES GROWN IN CALI presence of the respective members and suant to the marketing agreement and FORNIA may pay expenses as aforesaid. Order No. 916 (7 CFR Part 916), regu 7. The provisions of § 916.45 are lating the handling of nectarines grown Regulation by Grade and Size amended to read as follows: in California. This regulatory pro gram is effective under the Agricultural § 917.378 Plum Regulation 7 (Trag § 916.45 Marketing research and devel Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as edy). opment. amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). After con (a) Findings. (1) Pursuant to the The committee, with the approval of sideration of all relevant matters pre marketing agreement, as amended, and the Secretary, may establish or provide sented, including the proposals set forth Order No. 917, as amended (7 CFR Part for the establishment of marketing re in such notice which were submitted by 917; 30 F.R. 15990), regulating the search and development projects de the Nectarine Administrative Committee handling of fresh pears, plums, and signed to assist, improve, or promote the (established pursuant to said marketing peaches grown in California, effective marketing, distribution, and consumption agreement and order), it is hereby found under the applicable provisions of the of nectarines. Such projects may pro and determined that: Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), vide for any form of marketing promo § 916.205' Expenses and rate of assess tion including paid advertising. The and upon the basis of the recommenda ment. expense of such projects shall be paid by tions of the Plum Commodity Commit funds collected pursuant to § 916.41. (a) E x p e n s e s . Expenses that are tee, estáblished under the aforesaid reasonable and likely to be incurred by amended marketing agreement and § 916.64 [Amended] the Nectarine Administrative Committee order, and upon other available informa 8. The provisions of § 916.64 are during the period March 1,1966, through tion, it is hereby found that the limita amended as follows: February 28, 1967, will amount to tion of shipments of plums of the va a. Paragraph (e) is redesignated as $183,581. riety hereinafter set forth, and in the paragraph (f). (b) Rate of assessment. The rate of manner herein provided, will tend to ef assessment for said period, payable by fectuate the declared policy of the act. b. Paragraph (d) is deleted and the each handler in accordance with § 916.41, (2) It is hereby further found that it following substituted therefor:^ is fixed at $0.03 per standard lug box is impracticable, unnecessary, and con (d) The committee shall consider all of nectarines, or equivalent quantity of trary to the public interest to give pre petitions from growers submitted to it for nectarines in other containers or in bulk. liminary notice, engage in public rule- termination of this part provided such (c) Reserve. Unexpended assessment making procedure, and postpone the ef petitions are received by the committee frnids, in excess of expenses incurred fective date of this section until 30 days prior to October 1 of the then current fis during the fiscal period ending February after publication thereof in the F ederal cal period. Upon recommendation of the 28, 1967, shall be carried as a reserve R egister (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011) in that, as in accordance with the applicable pro hereinafter set forth, the time interven committee received not later than De visions of § 916.42 of said marketing ing between the date when information cember 1 of the then current fiscal period, agreement and order. upon which this section is based became the Secretary shall conduct a referendum It is hereby further found that good available and the time when this section among the growers prior to February 15 cause exists for not postponing the .ef must become effective in order to ef of such fiscal period to ascertain whether fective date hereof until 30 days after fectuate the declared policy of the act is continuance of this part is favored by publication in the F ederal R egister (5 insufficient; a reasonable time is per mitted, under the circumstances, for producers. U.S.C. 1001-1011) in that (1) shipments of the current crop of nectarines grown preparation for such effective time; and (e) The Secretary shall conduct a in California are now being made; (2) good cause exists for making the provi referendum within the period beginning the relevant provisions of said marketing sions hereof effective not later than the December 1, 1968, and ending February agreement and this part require that the date hereinafter specified. A reasonable 15, 1969, to ascertain whether continu rate of assessment herein fixed shall be determination as to the supply of, and ance of this part is favored by the applicable to all assessable nectarines the demand for, such plums must await the development of the crop thereof, and growers. The Secretary shall conduct handled during the aforesaid period; and (3) such period began on March 1, 1966, adequate information thereon was not such a referendum within the same and said rate of assessment will auto available to the Plum Commodity Com Period of every fourth fiscal period there matically apply to all such nectarines mittee until the date hereinafter set after. beginning with such date. forth on which an open meeting was FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8178 . RULES AND REGULATIONS / held, after giving due notice thereof, to 674), a referendum was conducted among area extension within the Portland, consider the need for, and the extent of, south Texas carrot producers during the Maine transition area. regulation of shipments of such plums. period March 31 through April 4, 1966 Since this action involves, in part, the Interested persons were afforded an op (31 F.R. 4353). The purpose of the ref designation of navigable airspace out portunity to submit information and erendum was to determine whether such side the United States, the Administra views at this meeting; the recommenda producers favor continuation or termina tor has consulted with the Secretary of tion and supporting information for reg tion of Marketing Agreement No. 142 and State and the Secretary of Defense in ulation during the period specified herein Order No. 970 (7 CFR Part 970) regulat accordance with the provisions of Execu were promptly submitted to the Depart ing the handling of carrots grown in tive Order 10854. ment after such meeting was held ; ship south Texas (hereinafter referred to col The Boston control area extension is ments of the current crop of such plums lectively as the “order”) . now covered by portions of the Boston, are expected to begin on or about the ef It is hereby found upon the basis of Falmouth, Mass., Chicopee Falls*, Mass., fective date hereof; this section should said referendum that termination of the Concord, N.H., Portland, Maine, and be applicable to all such shipments in order is favored by a majority of the pro Providence, R X , transition areas. In order to effectuate the declared policy of ducers who, during the determined rep cluded in this action are editorial changes the act; the provisions of this section resentative period August 1, 1964, to July to Control 1141 and Control 1142 to sub are identical with the aforesaid recom 31, 1965, have been engaged.in the pro stitute references to the Boston control mendation of the committee; informa duction for market of carrots grown areas extension with references to the tion concerning such provisions and ef within the production area specified in Boston transition area. In addiion, con fective time has been disseminated such order. It is further foimd that such tinued designation of the portion of the among handlers of such plums; and majority of producers has, during such Boston control area extension outside compliance with the provisions of this representative period, produced for mar of the continental control area extend section will not require of handlers any ket more than 50 per centum of the vol ing upward from FL 240 to FL 300 in preparation therefor which cannot be ume of càrrots produced for market clusive within an 18-mile radius of the completed by the effective time hereof. within such production area. Pease, N.H., RBN is required for Pease Such committee meeting was held on Therefore, pursuant to § 970.84(c) of AFB high altitude IFR activities. May 31, 1966. the order and § 608c(16) (B) of the act, Since the airspace required for the (b) Order. : (1) The provisions of Marketing Agreement No. 142- and said protection of IFR operations in this area § 917.373 (Plum Regulation 2; 31 P.R. Order No. 970, and the rules and regula is included within the descriptions of the 7242) shall not apply to Tragedy plums tions thereunder, are, with the exception above-mentioned transition areas and all during the period specified in subpara of §§ 970.43, 970.85, and 970.86, hereby unnecessary controlled airspace is hereby graph (2) of this paragraph. terminated at the end of the current fis released to the public for other purposes, (2) During the period beginning at cal and marketing period, i.e., July 31, the burden upon the public is reduced. 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., June 10, 1966, and 1966. For this reason the Administrator finds ending at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., November 1, The Director, Fruit and Vegetable Di that notice and public procedure hereon 1966, no handler shall ship any package vision, Consumer and Marketing Service, are unnecessary, and for this reason the or container of Tragedy plums unless: is authorized to supervise liquidation by amendments may become effective with (i) Such plums grade at least U.S. No. the trustees of the affairs of the South out regard to the 30 day statutory period 1, with a total tolerance of ten (10) per Texas Carrot Committee, to appoint any preceding effectiveness. cent for defects not considered serious successor trustees, to take any other In consideration of the foregoing, Part damage in addition to the tolerances action necessary to complete the liquida 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is permitted by such grade; and tion, and to discharge the liquidating amended, effective upon publication in (ii) Such plums are of a size that, trustees. Upon determination by the the F ederal R egister, as hereinafter set when packed in a standard basket, they Director that liquidation has been com forth. will pack at least a 5 x 6 standard pack. pleted, he shall terminate §§ 970.43, a. In § 71.163 (31 F.R. 2050) the fol (3) When used herein, “U.S. No. 1,” 970.85, and 970.86. lowing actions are taken: “standard pack,” and “serious damage” (Secs. 1—19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C 1. In the text of Control 1141, “Boston, shall have the same meaning as set forth 601-674) Mass., control area extension,” is deleted, in the U.S. Standards for Grades of and “Boston, Mass., transition area," is Fresh Plums and Prunes (§§ 51.1520-1538 Dated June 7, 1966 to become effective substituted therefor. of this title; 31 F.R. 6240, 7169) ; “stand July 31, 1966. 2. In the text of Control 1142, “Boston ard basket” shall mean the standard J ohn A. S chnittker, control area extension,” is deleted, and basket set forth in paragraph 1 of section Acting Secretary. “Boston, Mass., transition area,” is sub 828.1 of the Agricultural Code of Cali stituted therefor. fornia; and, except as otherwise speci [F.R. Doc. 66-6393; Filed, June 9, 1966; 8:48 a.m.] b. In § 71.165 (31 F.R. 2055), the Bos fied, all other terms shall have the same ton, Mass., control area extension is meaning as when used in the amended revoked. marketing agreement and order. c. In § 71.181 (31 F.R. 2149), the Port (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND land, Maine, transition area is amended 601-674) as follows: In the text, “excluding the Dated: June 8, 1966. portion within R-4901 and C-516." is SPACE deleted and “including that airspace out P aul A. Nicholson, Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency side of the continental control area ex Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg tending upward from FL 240 to FL 300, (Airspace Docket No. 65-EA-1101 etable Division, Consumer and \ inclusive, within ¡an 18-mile radius of the Marketing Service. PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL Pease, N.H., RBN. The portions within R-4901 and C-516 are excluded.” is sub [F.R. Doc. 66-6420; Filed, June 9, 1966; AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, 8:49 a.m.] stituted therefor. AND REPORTING POINTS (Secs. 307(a), 1110, Federal Aviation Act of Revocation and Alteration of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348, 1510) ; Executive Order PART 970— CARROTS GROWN IN Controlled Airspace 10854 (24 F.R. 9565)) SOUTH TEXAS The purpose of these amendments is Issued in Washington, D.C., on June 3, Order Terminating Marketing to revoke the Boston, Mass., control area 1966. Agreement and Order extension, to substitute references to the J ohn D. Mattson, Boston transition area for the Boston Acting Chief, Airspace and Pursuant to the applicable provisions control area extension, as appropriate, in Air Traffic Rules Division. of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement additional control areas, and to include [F.R. Doc. 66-6356; Filed, June 9, 1900! Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601- a portion of the present Boston control 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 8179 [Airspace Docket No. 65—WE—43] in the description of the Andover, N.J., National Advisory Council determina transition area the coordinates, “41°00'- tion of September 7, 1965. The letter PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL 00" N., 74°44'00" W.” and insert in lieu containing the designation reads as AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR thereof, “41°00'30" N„ 74°44'20" W ”. follows: SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS Also revise the description to add the December 1,1965. phrase, “within 2 miles each side of the Hon. Henry H. F owler, Alteration of Federal Airways Secretary of the Treasury, Stillwater, N.J., VOR 083° radial extend Washington, D.C., 20220. On May 6, 1966, F.R. Doc. No. 66-4943 ing from the 7 »-mile radius area to the Dear Mr. S ecretary: On September 7, 1965, was published in the F ederal R egister VOR” after the words, “west of _the the National Advisory Council, after consul (31 F.R. 6791). Item 4 of this document VOR” and before the words, “effective tation with this Bureau in accordance with altered a segment of V-86 to read from sunrise to sunset daily.” section 2(a) of Executive Order 10033, made “Billings, Mont.; 32 miles 12 AGL, 35 the following determination (Action 65 (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (E.O.)-49) : miles 75 MSL, 12 AGL Sheridan, Wyo.; (72 State. 749; 49 U.S.C. 1348)) “The National Advisory Council, having 20 miles 12 AGL, 45 miles 70 MSL, 72 Issued in Jamaica, N.Y., on May 27, consulted with the Director of the Bureau of miles 80 MSL, 12 AGL Rapid City, the Budget, determines that current infor S. Dak.;”. Subsequent to publication of 1966. mation with respect to international capital the document, it was determined that the W ayne Hendershot, movements, derived from data on U.S. lia 8,000-foot MSL segment of V-86 would Deputy Director, Eastern Region. bilities to and claims on foreigners and trans be less than 1,200 feet AGL in the vicinity [F.R. Doc. 66-6358; Filed, June 9, 1966; actions in securities with foreigners, and cur of Laird Peak. Reestablishment of the 8:45 a.m.] rent information with respect to U.S. gold holdings, foreign-currency holding^, and dol 1,200-foot AGL segment approximately lar liabilities to foreigners, are essential in 9 miles further west to a point 54 miles order that the United States may comply west of the Rapid City VORTAC, would with official requests of the International alleviate this condition. Such action is Title 31— MONEY AND Monetary Fund for information with respect taken herein. to the U.S. balance of payments and mone Since this action is minor in nature FINANCE: TREASURY tary reserves.” and will result in a reduced amount of It is hereby determined, pursuant to section assigned airspace, the Administrator has Chapter I— Monetary Offices, Depart 2(b) of Executive Order 10033, that the determined that notice and public pro ment of the Treasury Treasury Department shall collect informa tion pertaining to capital movements be cedure hereon are unnecessary and that PART 128— TRANSACTIONS IN FOR the action may be made effective tween the United States and foreign coun immediately. EIGN EXCHANGE, TRANSFERS OF tries and pertaining to the monetary reserves CREDIT, AND EXPORT OF COIN of the United States, except information per In consideration of the foregoing, ef taining to direct-investment transactions, fective immediately, F.R. Doc. No. 66- AND CURRENCY U.S. Government foreign lending operations, 4943, Item 4 is amended as follows: In and claims and liabilities of U.S. Govern V-86 “72 miles” is deleted and “63 miles” Amendment of Appendix ment agencies (othér than public debt ob is substituted therefor. The Appendix to Part 128 sets forth ligations), which is collected by the Depart ment of Commerce. (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958 the texts of determinations which had This letter supersedes the earlier deter (49 U.S.C. 1348)) been made by the National Advisory mination as to the responsibilities of the Issued in Washington, D.C., on June 3, Council and the Bureau of the Budget Treasury Department in this area, dated 1966. - pursuant to section 2 (a) and (b) of E.O. April 21, 1949, as amended May 4, 1950. 10033. These determinations have been Sincerely yours, J ohn D. Mattson, superseded and accordingly, the Appen R aymond T. B owman, Acting Chief, Airspace and Assistant Director for Air Traffic Rules Division. dix to Part 128 is hereby amended to read as follows: Statistical Standards. [F.R. Doc. 66-6357; Filed, June 9, 1966; I. Determination of the National Ad Note to § 128.2. , A note is being added 8:45 am .] visory Council pursuant to E.O. 10033. to this section for the purpose of calling In an action dated September 7, 1965, attention to the actions abolishing and [Airspace Docket No. 66—EA—25] the National Advisory Council on Inter reestablishing the National Advisory PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL national Monetary and Financial Prob Council and amending Executive Order AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, lems made tl)e following determination 10033 of February 9,1949. AND REPORTING POINTS pursuant to section 2(a) of E.O. 10033 of The note shall read as follows : February 8,1949: . No te: The National Advisory Council on Alteration of Transition Area Action 65 (E.O.)-49. The National Ad International Monetary and Financial Prob visory Council, having consulted with the lems created by section 4 of the Bretton The Federal Aviation Agency Director of the Bureau of the Budget, de Woods Agreements Act (59 Stat. 512; 22 U.S.C. amending § 71.181 of Part 71 of the Fe termines that current information with re 286b) was abolished, effective July 27, 1965, eral Aviation Regulations so as to all spect to international capital movements, de under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1965 pur the Andover, N.J. (31 F.R. 2153) 700-fc rived from data on U.S. liabilities to and suant to the Reorganization Act of 1949 and floor transition area. claims on foreigners and transactions in se its functions were transferred to the Presi Due to a U.S. Coast and Geode curities with foreigners, and current infor dent. Survey refinement of the airport gt mation with respect to U.S. gold holdings, foreign-currency holdings, and dollar liabili Executive Order 11238, July 28, 1965, graphical coordinates an alteration ties to/foreigners, are essential in order that (1) established a new “National Advisory the description of the Andover, N.J., 7( the United States may comply with official Council on International Monetary and foot floor transition area will be nec< requests of the International Monetary Fund Financial Problems” with the same mem fry . Also, an additional extension v for information with respect to the U.S. bal bership, functions, and status as the De required to more accurately porti ance of payments and monetary reserves. Council established by section 4 of the jr e airspace protection requirements 1 Action No. 320, March 17, 1949, is super Bretton Woods Agreements had had im the final approach course. seded by this determination and is hereby mediately prior to the taking effect of Re Since these amendments are minor revoked. organization Plan No. 4 of 1965, and (2) ature, notice and public procedure he: n. Designation of the Treasury De provided that the new Council should n are unnecessary and the amendmei partment by the Director of the Bureau terminate on January 1, 1966, or on such y be made effective upon publicatii of the Budget pursuant to section 2(b) earlier date as might be prescribed. rvm?»^w the foregoing, the amer of E.O. 10033. Executive Order 11269, February 14, rmKK hereby adopted effective up On December 1, 1965, the Treasury 1966, established, effective January 1, follows 10n *n ^'EDERAL R egister Department was designated, pursuant 1966, the “National Advisory Council on to section 2(b) of E.O. 10033 of February International Monetary and Financial 71181 of part 71 of the F< 8, 1949, to collect information for the Policies” and delegated to it all the func ai Aviation Regulations so as to del International Monetary Fund under the tions which had been vested in the Presi- No. H2------2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8180 RULES AND REGULATIONS dent under Reorganization Plan No. 4 of § 221.10 Awards of advertised timber. 1965, exclusive of certain functions dele Title 36— PARKS, FORESTS, * * * * * gated to the Secretary of the Treasury. (d) If timber is advertised as set aside Section 5 of the Executive Order AND MEMORIALS for competitive bidding by small business amended section 2(a) of Executive Order concerns, award will be made to the high 10033, February 8, 1949, by substituting Chapter II— Forest Service, Depart est bidder who qualifies as a small busi for the name “National Advisory Coun ment of Agriculture ness concern and who has not been determined by the Small Business Ad cil on International Monetary and Fi [Reg. S-10] ministration to be ineligible for prefer nancial Problems" the following: “Na PART 221— TIMBER ential award of set-aside sales. tional Advisory Council on International (30 Stat. 35, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 476, 551) Monetary and Financial Policies.” Awards of Advertised Timber Done at Washington, D.C., this 7th [ seal ] Merlyn N. T rued, Section 221.10 of Title 36, Code of Fed day of June 1966. Assistant Secretary. J ohn A. B aker, eral Regulations, is amended by the ad Assistant Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 66-6383; Filed, June 9, 1966; dition of paragraph (d) to read as fol [F.R. Doc. 66-6395; Filed, June 9, 1966; 8:47 a.m.] lows: 8:48 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. .112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8181 Proposed Rule Making statement of interest and written agree DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR § 31t12 ment, if any, or a statement of the nature (b) * * * of such agreement, If oral, must accom Bureau of Land Management (5) At the time of filing, a signed pany the application. Simultaneously, all interested parties must furnish evi [43 CFR Parts 3130, 3140, 3150, statement by the offeror that he is the sole party in interest in the offer and the dence of their qualifications to hold such 3160, 3180 1 lease or permit, if issued; if not, he shall lease interest or permit. ***** MINERAL LEASES, PERMITS, AND set forth the names of the other inter ested parties. If there are other parties 5. Amend § 3181.2 by adding a new LICENSES interested in the offer, a separate state subparagraph (5) to paragraph (b) to Notice of Proposed Rule Making ment must be signed by them and by the read as follows: offeror setting forth the nature and ex tent of the interest of each in the offer, § 3181.2 Qualifications of applicants. Basis and purpose. Notice is hereby ***** given that pursuant to the authority the nature of the agreement between vested in the Secretary of the Interior them, if oral, and a copy of such agree (b) * * * by the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (41 ment, if written. Such separate state (5) At the time of filing, a signed Stat. 437; 30 U.S.C. 108 et seq.), as ment of interest or written agreement, statement by the offeror that he is the amended, the act of August 31,1964 (P.L. if any, or a statement of the nature of sole party in interest in the offer and the 88-526; 78 Stat. 710), and section 2478 of such agreement, if oral, must accompany lease or permit, if issued; if not, he shall the Revised Statutes (43 U.S.C. 1201), it the application. Simultaneously, all in set forth the names of the other inter is proposed to amend 43 CFR Parts 3130, terested- parties must furnish evidence ested parties. If there are other parties 3140, 3150, 3160, and 3180 as set forth of their qualifications to hold such lease interested in the offer, a separate state below. interest or permit. ment must be signed by them and by the The purpose of the amendments is to 3. Amend § 3151.2 by adding a new offeror setting forth the nature and ex provide for the filing of a statement of subparagraph (5) to paragraph (b) to tent of the interest of each in the offer, interest of applicants for mineral leases read as follows: the nature of the agreement between and permits similar to that presently them, if oral, and a copy of such agree required for oil and gas lease applica § 3151.2 Qualifications of applicant. ment if written. Such separate state tions. ***** ment of interest and written agreement, It is the policy of the Department of (b) * * * if any, or a statement of the nature of the Interior whenever practicable, to af (5) At the time of filing, a signed such agreement, if oral, must accompany ford the public an opportunity to par statement by the offeror that he is the the application. Simultaneously, all in ticipate in the rule making process. Ac sole party in interest in the offer and terested parties must furnish evidence of cordingly, interested persons may submit the lease or permit, if issued; if not, he their qualifications to hold such lease in written comments, suggestions, or ob shall set forth the names of the other terest or permit. jections with respect to the proposed interested parties. If there are other Harry R . Anderson, amendments, to the Bureau of Land parties interested in the offer, a separate Assistant Secretary of the Interior. Management, Washington, D.C., within statement must be signed by them and 30 days of the date of publication of by the offeror setting forth the nature J une 6, 1966. this notice in the F ederal R egister. and extent of the Interest of each in the [F.R. Doc. 66-6371; Filed, June 9, 1966; 1. Amend § 3131.2 by adding a newoffer, the nature of the agreement be 8:46 a.m.J paragraph (e) to read as follows: tween them, if oral, and a copy of such agreement if written. Such separate § 3131,2 Application for lease. statement of interest or written agree ***** ment, if any, or a statement of the nature DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE of such agreements, if oral, must accom Consumer and Marketing Service (e) Every applicant for lease or permit pany the application. Simultaneously, must submit at the time of filing a signed [ 7 CFR Part 915 ] statement that he is the sole party in all interested parties must furnish evi interest in the offer and the lease or per dence of their qualifications to hold such AVOCADOS GROWN IN SQUTH lease interest or permit. mit, if issued; if not, he shall set forth FLORIDA me names of the other interested parties, 4. Amend § 3161.2 by adding a new if there are other parties interested in subparagraph (5) to paragraph (b) to Approval of Expenses and Fixing of the offer, a separate statement must be read as follows: Rate of Assessment for 1966—67 ttmhi and by the offeror setting § 3161.2 Qualifications of applicant. Fiscal Year iorth the nature and extent of the inter est of each in the offer, the nature of the * * * * • Consideration is being given to the agreement between them, if oral, and (b) * * * following proposals submitted by the copy of such agreement if written, (5) At the time of filing, a signed Florida Avocado Administrative Com uch separate statement of interest and statement by the offeror that he is the mittee, established under the marketing jjroten agreement, if any, or a state- sole party in interest in the offer and agreement, as amended, and Order No. rn-Qi 0i the na^ure of such agreement, if the lease or permit, if issued; if not, he 915, as amended (7 CFR Part 915), regu ^ h st accompany the application. shall set forth the names of the other lating the handling of avocados grown +”aneously. all interested parties interested parties. If there are other in south Florida, effective under the ap must furnish evidence of their qualifi- parties interested in the offer, a separate plicable provisions of the Agricultural statement must be signed by them and Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as Permit sucl1 lease interest or by the offeror setting forth the nature amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), as the and extent of the interest of each in the agency to administer the terms and pro suhn^mend ^ 3141.2 by adding a offer, the nature of the agreement be visions thereof: (1) That expenses that tween them, if oral, and a copy of such are reasonable and likely to be incurred S S t ® 40 paragiaph ( agreement if written. Such separate by the Avocado Administrative Commit- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8182 PROPOSED RULE MAKING tee, during the period from April 1, 1966, high seas or in airspace of undetermined 30" W., to latitude 24°13'00" N., longi through March 31, 1967, will amount to sovereignty. A contracting state accept tude 82°21'00" W., to latitude 24°25'00" $10,816; and (2) that there be fixed, at ing such responsibility may apply the N., longitude 82° 32'00" W., to latitude $0.05 per bushel of avocados, the rate International Standards and Recom 24°45'00" N., longitude 82°32'00" W.,’to of assessment payable by each handler mended Practices to civil aircraft in a latitude 24°45'00" N., longitude 81°56'- in accordance with § 915.41 of the afore manner consistent with that adopted for 50" W., to latitude 24°49'00" N., longi said marketing agreement and order. airspace under its domestic jurisdiction. tude 81°55'00" W., to the point of be All persons who desire to submit writ In accordance with Article 3 of the ginning, including the airspace north ten data, views, or arguments in con Convention on International Civil Avi east of Key West bounded on the north nection with the aforesaid proposals ation, Chicago, 1944, state aircraft are by Blue 19, on the east and south by V-3, should file the same, in quadruplicate, exempt from the provisions of Annex 11 and on the southwest by the 35-mile with the Hearing Clerk, U.S. Depart and its Standards and Recommended radius circle, excluding the portion with ment of Agriculture, Room 112, Ad Practices. As a contracting state, the in W-173 and W-465. ministration Building, Washington, United States agreed by Article 3(d) that b. The Key West control area exten D.C., 20250, not later than the 10th day its state aircraft will be operated in in sion would be revoked. after the publication of this notice in ternational airspace with due regard for Navy Key West Approach Control pro the F ederal R egister. All written sub the safety of civil aircraft. missions made pursuant to this notice vides approach control service for the Since this action involves, in part, the Key West International Airport, NAS will be made available for public inspec designation of navigable airspace outside tion at the office of the Hearing Clerk Boca Chica, and NAS Key West Sea the United States, the Administrator has drome. A 7-mile radius area of NAS during regular business hours (7 CFR consulted with the Secretary of State and 1.27(b)). Boca Chica is required for the protec the Secretary of Defense in accordance tion of IFR aircraft departing all run Dated: June6,1966. with the provisions of Executive Order ways until reaching 1,200 feet above the 10854. surface. A 1,200-foot transition area is P aul A. Nicholson, Interested persons may submit such D&puty Director, Fruit and Veg required within a 35-mile radius of Key written data, views or arguments as they West VOR with an extension required to etable Division, Consumer may desire. Communications should be and Marketing Service. the west to encompass the area under submitted in triplicate to the Director, approach control jurisdiction and hold [F.R. Doc. 66-6378; Filed, June 9, 1966; Southern Region, Attention: Chief, Air ing areas. Airspace at low level is also 8:47 a.m.] Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Agency, required for low level military IFR ma Post Office Box 20636, Atlanta, Ga„ neuvers, AFIO scramble procedures and 30320. All communications r e c e i v e d on-course requested scramble depar within 45 days after publication of this tures, as well as normal departure rout FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY notice in the F ederal R egister will be ings. The extension to the northeast considered before action is taken on the of Key West extending from the 35-mile [ 14 CFR Part 71 ] proposed amendments. The proposals radius arc bounded on the north by B-10 contained in this notice may be changed [Airspace Docket No. 63-SO-56] and on the east and south by V-3 is re in the light of comments received. quired for overseas operations which are TRANSITION AREA AND CONTROL An official docket will be available for routed over Marathon radio beacon di AREA EXTENSION examination by interested persons at the rect to Sable INT, thence direct Perrine Federal Aviation Agency, Office of the radio beacon or Miami TLS outer marker. General Counsel, Attention: Rules Dock Proposed Alteration and Revocation The western extension with the 1,200- et, 800 Independence Avenue SW., foot floor is required to provide protected The Federal Aviation Agency is con Washington, D.C., 20553. An informal airspace for jet instrument approach sidering amendments to Part 71 of the docket also will be available for examina procedures employing delayed descent Federal Aviation Regulations that would tion at the office of the Regional Air Traffic Division Chief. features followed by lengthy low altitude alter the Key West, Fla., transition area approach segments. The southern por and revoke the Key West control area The Federal Aviation Agency having tion is required for low altitude holding extension. completed a comprehensive review of the southeast of the Dorado Intersection and As parts of these proposals relate to terminal airspace structure requirements for departures utilizing Control 1233 at the navigable airspace outside the United in the Key West terminal area, including 1,500 feet for distances of 25 nautical States, this notice is submitted in con studies attendant to the implementation miles. sonance with the ICAO International of the provisions of CAR Amendments Standards and Recommended Practices. 60-21/60-29, proposes the following air Revocation of the Key West control Applicability of International Stand space actions. área extension is proposed as this desig nated airspace would no longer be re ards and Recommended Practices, by Air a. Alter the Key West transition area Traffic Service, FAA, in areas outside quired to protect instrument operations by redesignating it as that airspace ex in the area. domestic airspace of the United States tending upward from 700 feet above the is governed by Article 12 and Annex 11 surface within a 7-mile radius of NAS No changes would be made to instru to the Convention on International Civil Key West (Boca Chica) (latitude 24°34'- ment approach procedures at Key West Aviation (ICAO), which pertains to the 26" N., longitude 81°41T8" W .); within as a result of this action. Alterations establishment of air navigation facilities 2 miles each side of the 251° True bearing of the Key West control zone were ac and services necessary to promoting the from the Navy Key West UHF RBN, ex complished in ’Airspace Docket No. 65- safe, orderly and expeditious flow of civil tending from the 7-mile radius area to SO-29 (30 F.R. 12332, 13512). air traffic. Its purpose is to insure that 23 miles west of the UHF RBN; within 2 These amendments are proposed un civil flying on international air routes is miles each side of the-Navy Key West der the authority of sections 307 (a) and carried out under uniform conditions TACAN 246° True radial, extending from 1110 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 designed to improve the safety and effi the 7-mile radius area to 16 miles south (49 U.S.C. 1348, 1510), and Executive ciency of air operations. west of the TACAN; and that airspace Order 10854 (24 F R . 9565). The International Standards and extending upward from 1,200 feet above Recommended Practices in Annex 11 ap the surface bounded by a line extending Issued in Washington, D.C., on June ply in those parts of the airspace under from latitude 25°04'05" N., longitude 3, 1966. the jurisdiction of a contracting state, 81°58'15" W., thence clockwise along the J ohn D. Mattson, derived from ICAO, wherein air traffic arc of a 35-mile radius circle centered at Acting Chief, Airspace and services are provided and also whenever the Key West VORTAC to latitude 24 °- Air Traffic Rules Division. a contracting state accepts the responsi 08'50" N., longitude 82604'35" W., to [F.R. Doc. 66—6359; Filed, June 9, 196«: bility of providing air traffic services over latitude 24°l3'00" N., longitude 82°02'- 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL; 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 1 I, 1966 i PROPOSED RULE MAKING 8183 [ 14 CFR Part 71 1 The proposed modification is to the Airport, Topeka, Kans. (latitude 39°- Manhattan, Kans., 1,200-foot transition 04*09" N., longitude 95°37'18" W .), [Airspace Docket No. 66—CE—49] area and will provide controlled airspace within 2 miles each side of the Topeka TRANSITION AREA for aircraft departing from and arriving VORTAC 039° radial, extending from the at Marshall AAF, Fort Riley, Kans., and 7-mile radius area to 8 miles NE of the Proposed Alteration the Manhattan, Kans., Municipal Air VORTAC, within 5 miles SW and 8 miles port. The modification will also permit NE of the Philip Billard Airport ILS- The Federal Aviation Agen FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8184 PROPOSED RULE MAKING The Federal Aviation Agency, having 95°09'00" W., thence N along longitude fore action is taken on the proposed completed a comprehensive review of the 95°09'00" W. to the S edge of V-71, amendment. No public hearing is con terminal airspace structural require thence NW to latitude 39°49'00" N., templated at this time, but arrangements ments in the Topeka, Kans., terminal longitude 95°34'00" W., thence direct to for informal conferences with Federal area, which revealed a need for revising point of beginning excluding the portion Aviation Agency officials may be made the designated 1,200-foot transition area, within the Emporia, Kans., transition by contracting the Regional Air Traffic proposes the following airspace action: area. Division Chief. Any data, views or argu Redesignate the Topeka, Kans., tran The additional controlled airspace pro ments presented diming such confer sition area as that airspace extending posed herein will provide protection for ences must also be submitted in writing upward from 700 feet above the surface aircraft executing the Topeka JAL/VOR in accordance with this notice in order to within a 7-mile radius of Philip Billard approach procedure. Air Traffic Con become part of the record for considera Airport, Topeka, Kans. (latitude 39°04'- trol requirements no longer exist for the tion. The proposal contained in this no 09" N., longitude 95°37'18" W .), within 3,500-foot floor transition area. tice may be changed in the light of com 2 miles each side of the Topeka VORTAC The floors of the airways that traverse ments received. 039° radial extending from the 7-mile the transition area proposed herein The public docket will be available for radius area to 8 miles NE of the VORTAC, would automatically coincide with the examination by interested persons in the within 5 miles SW and 8 miles NE of the floors of the transition area. Office of the Regional Counsel, Federal Philip Billard Airport ILS localizer NW Aviation Agency, Federal Building, 601 course, extending from 3 miles SE to 12 No procedural changes would be ef fected in conjunction with the actions East 12th Street, Kansas City, Mo., miles NW of the OM, w ithin.a 7-mile 64106. radius of Forbes AFB, Topeka, Kans. proposed herein. (latitude 38°57'10" N., longitude 95°39'- Interested persons may submit such This amendment is proposed under the 50" W .), and within 2 miles each side of written data, views or arguments as they authority of section 307(a) of the Fed the Forbes AFB TACAN 321° radial ex may desire. Communications should be eral Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. tending from the 7-mile radius area to 9 submitted in triplicate to the Director, 1348). miles NW of the TACAN ; that airspace Central Region, Attention: Chief, Air extending upward from 1,200 feet above Traffic Division, Federal Aviation Issued at Kansas City, Mo., on May 27, the surface bounded by the Emporia, Agency, Federal Building, 601 East 12th 1966. Kans., VORTAC 346° radial beginning Street, Kansas City, Mo., 64106. All E dward C. Marsh, at latitude 39°26'50" N., longitude 96°30'- communications received within 45 days Director, Central Region. 50" W., S to the NW edge of V-10, thence after publication of this notice in the [F.R. Doc. 66-6361; Filed, June 9, 1966; NE to latitude 39°00'00" N.. longitude F ederal R egister will be considered be 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8185 Notices All interested persons who desire to be solidated Farmers Home Administration DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE heard in the matter shall notify the Act of 1961 (7 U.S.C. 1961), it has been Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agrir determined that in the hereinafter- Consumer and Marketing Service culture, Washington, D.C., 20250, within named counties in the State of Texas natural disasters have caused a continu [P. & S. Docket No. 3441 10 days after the publication of this notice in the F ederal R egister. ing need for agricultural credit not read ily available from commercial banks, UNION STOCK YARDS CO. OF Done at Washington, D.C., this 6th OMAHA (LTD.) cooperative lending agencies, or other day of June 1966. responsible sources. Notice of Petition for Modification G lenn G. B ierman, Texas: Present designation of Rate Order Acting Director, Packers and ETiHg ______30 F.R. 13907 Stockyards Division, Con Fannin______30 F.R. 11977 Pursuant to the provisions of the Pack sumer and Marketing Service. Fort Bend_.______30 F.R. 10864 ers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended [F.R. Doc. 66-6394; Filed, June 9, 1966; (7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.), an order was issued 8:48 am .] Pursuant to the authority set forth on June 23, 1965 (24 A.D. 823), continu above, emergency loans will not be made ing in effect to and including July 31, in the above-named counties after June 1967, an order issued on June 18, 1962 Forest Service 30, 1967, except to applicants who pre viously received emergency or special (21 A.D. 571), authorizing the respond SAN GABRIEL WILDERNESS ent, Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha livestock loan assistance and who can (Ltd.), Omaha, Nebr., to assess the cur Proposal and Hearing Announcement qualify under established policies and rent temporary schedule of rates and procedures. charges. Notice is hereby given in accordance with the provisions of the Wilderness Act Done at Washington, D.C., this 7th day By a petition filed on May 26,1966, the of June 1966. respondent requested authority to of September 3, 1964 (P.L: 88-577; 78 Stat. 890, 892; 16 U.S.C. 1131,1132), that Orville L. F reeman, modify, as soon as possible, the current Secretary. temporary schedule of rates and charges a public hearing will be held beginning as indicated below, and requested that at 9 a.m„ on July 27, 1966, in the audi [F.R. Doc. 66-6397; Filed, June 9, 1966; the current schedule, as so modified, be torium, Eaton Canyon Nature Center, 8:48 a.m.] continued for a period of 2 years. 1750 North Altadena Drive, Altadena, Calif., on a proposal for a recommenda Section N o. 1—Yardage Charges tion to be made by the Secretary of Agri culture to the President of the United Bate per bead TARIFF COMMISSIUN States that a recommendation be sub [AA1921—49J mitted to Congress for the establishment Pro-' posed of the San Gabriel Wilderness, compris STEEL JACKS FROM CANADA ing about 36,137 acres, including most of Notice of Hearing (a) All livestock received, and (b) all the Devil Canyon—Bear Canyon Primi livestock reweighed or resold: tive Area, and one contiguous area. The Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Cattle (except bulls 700 pounds or proposed -San Gabriel Wilderness is lo over)____;______$1.12 $1.20 Tariff Commission, on June 7, 1966, or Bulls (minimum 700 pounds)______1.65 1.75 cated within the Angeles National Forest, dered a public hearing to be held in con Calves (maximum 400 pounds)____ .65 .60 Los Angeles County, State of California. Hogs...... ; .40 .44 nection with the investigation instituted Sheep or goats... ” ” 11111111.11111! .23 .25 A brochure containing a map and in under section 201(a) of the Antidumping Horses or mules______1.12 1.20 formation about the proposed Wilderness Act, 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. 160(a)), E xceptions may be obtained from the Forest Super • * * visor, Angeles National Forest, 1015 with respect to steel jacks imported from (d) Livestock resold or reweighed, North Lake Avenue, Pasadena, Calif., or Canada, manufactured by J . C. Hallman other than through a commission nnn, in these yards for local deliv the Regional Forester, Appraiser’s Build Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Kitchner (for ery will be assessed the foHowing ing, 630 Sansome Street, San Francisco, yardage charges: merly Waterloo), Ontario, Canada. No Cattle (except bulls 700 pounds or Calif. tice of the institution of this investiga over)__ .37 .40 Individuals and organizations are in tion was published in the F ederal R egis Bulls (minimum 700 pounds)" ” ” ” .53 .57 vited to express their views by appear calves (maximum 400 pounds)____ .22 .23 ter .14 .15 ing at the Hearing or may submit writ on May 25, 1966 (31 F.R. 7534). .Sheep or goateV."” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ” ! .07 .08 The hearing will be held in the Hear i®) Livestock resold or reweighed, ten comments for inclusion in the official other than through a commission record to Regional Forester, Appraiser’s ing Room, Tariff Commission Building, „UnV.n these yards for shipment Building, 630 Sansome Street, San on the market, the foHowing Eighth and E Streets NW., Washington, charges will apply: Francisco, Calif., 94111, by August 27, D.C., at 10 ajn ., e.d.s.t., on July 6, 1966. cattle (except bulls 700 pounds or 1966. over)______.17 .18 Interested parties desiring to appear and 5 “'ls (minimum 700 pounds)" ” .26 .28 A. W. G r eel ey , Hora (maximum 400 pounds)...... 11 .12 Associate Chief, Forest Service. to be heard should notify the Secretary .08 .09 of the Commission, in writing, at least Sheep or goats..I ” ” ” .03 .03 [F.R. Doc. 66-6396; Filed, June 9, 1966; 8:48 a.m.] 3 days in advance of the date set modifications, if authorized, will for the hearing. additional revenue for the re- Office of the Secretary Issued: June 7,1966. irmd6^ an<* increase the cost of noa* liv?st°ck. Accordingly,itap- TEXAS By order of the Commission. rs that this public notice of the filing Extension of Designation of Areas [ seal] D onn N. B ent, he petition and its contents should for Emergency Loans Secretary. ^ given in order that all interested per- caif 0may.have an opportunity to indi- For the purpose of making emergency [F.R. Doc. 66-6384; Filed, June 9, 1966; a desire to be heard in the matter. loans pursuant to section 321 of the Con 8:48 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, I9 6 0 8186 NOTICES Bank of the Southwest N.A., SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Houston, Tex______.__ ___ 5, 000, 000 DEPARTMENT OF STATE T otal___ :______214, 975, 000 Agency for International COMMISSION Development [Pile No. 70-4390] The outstanding notes mature June 30, 1966, bear interest at the rate , of 5% [Delegation of Authority 36; Arndt. 1] PENNZOIL CO. percent per annum from the date of issue, and are subject to pro rata pre ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR Notice of Filing Regarding Renewal payment, in whole or in part, without ADMINISTRATION and Extension of Notes to Banks premium or penalty except that, if pre Delegation of Authority payment is made directly or indirectly J une 2,1966. from the proceeds of other bank borrow Pursuant to the authority delegated to Notice is hereby given that Pennzoil ings, a premium must be paid on the me by Delegation of Authority No. 104 Co. (“Pennzoil”), 900 Southwest Tower, prepaid principal amount, calculated at of November 3,1961, as amended (26 F.R. Houston, Tex., 77002, a registered hold the rate of Vi of 1 percent per annum 10608), I hereby direct that Delegation ing company, has filed with this Com from the date of prepayment to the date of Authority'No. 36 to the Assistant Ad mission a declaration and an amendment of maturity. ministrator for Administration (29 F.R. thereto, pursuant to the Public Utility Pennzoil proposes to renew and extend 5353) be, and it is hereby amended, as Holding Company Act of 1935 (“Act”), the maturity of all of the outstanding follows: designating sections 6 and 7 of the Act notes from June 30, 1966, to not later 1. In paragraph 2., add a new subpara as applicable to the proposed transac^ than December 31, 1966, upon substan graph (e), reading as follows: tion. All interested persons are referred tially the same terms and conditions, ex (e) Authority to settle and pay claims to said declaration, as amended, which cept that the rate of interest, initially of officers and employees of the Agency is summarized below, for a complete de and as thereafter adjusted from time for International Development (includ scription of the proposed transaction. to time, will be Vi of 1 percent in excess ing employees serving under personal Pennzoil proposes to renew and extend of the prime commercial rate for un services contracts where an employer- $214,975,000 principals amount of out secured loans in effect from time to time employee relationship exists between standing promissory notes payable to the during the extended period of the notes. themselves and this Agency) for damage banks named below, which Pennzoil The rate of interest initially is expected to, or loss of, personal property incident issued and sold on December 20, 1965, to be 5% percent per annum. to their service with this Agency, pur immediately prior to its registration as It is stated that no State commission suant to authority contained in section a holding company under the Act : and no Federal commission, other than 3 of the Military Personnel and Civilian Mellon National Bank & Trust this Commission, has jurisdiction over Employees’ Claims Act of 1964 (Public Co., Pittsburgh, Pa______$30,000, 000 the proposed transaction. Fees and ex Law 88-558), as amended. Chemical Bank New York Trust penses in connection with the renewal 2. This amendment to Delegation of Co., New York, N.Y______30, 000,000 and extension of the notes are estimated Authority No. 36 is effective immediately. The First National Bank of Chi at $3,750 including legal fees of $2,500. cago, 111______30,000,000 Davis E. B ell, Bank of America N.T. and S.A., Notice is further given that any inter Administrator. Los Angeles, Calif______30, 000,000 ested person may, not later than June May 31,1966. National Bank of Detroit, Mich_ 12,000, 000 21, 1966, request in writing that a hear First National Bank in St. Louis, ing be held on such matter, stating the [F.R. Doc. 66-6374; Filed, June 9, 1966; Mo______5, 000, 000 nature of his interest, the reasons for 8:46 a.m.] The First National Bank & Trust Co., of Tulsa, Okla______2,900, 000 such request, and the issues of fact or First National Bank of Fort law raised by said declaration, as MIZRACHI WOMEN’S ORGANIZA Worth, Tex______2,100,000 amended, which he desires to controvert; TION OF AMERICA, INC. Third National Bank in Nash or he may request that he be notified ville, Tenn______,______2, 000, 000 if the Commission should order a hearing Register of Voluntary Foreign Aid First National Lincoln Bank of thereon. Any such request should be Agencies Louisville, Ky______x,_____ 2, 000,000 addressed: Secretary, Securities and Ex Frost National Bank of San change Commission, Washington, D.C., In accordance with the regulations of Antonio, Tex_■.______1, 000,000 Bank of Texas, Houston, Tex_ 1,375,000 20549. A copy of such request should be the Agency for International Develop Tile Kanawha V a l l e y Bank, served personally or by mail (air mail if ment concerning Registration of Agen Charleston, W. Va______750,000 the person being served is located more cies for Voluntary Foreign Aid (A.I.D. The Alamo National Bank of San than 500 miles from the point of mail Regulation 3) 22 CFR Part 203, promul Antonio, Tex______600, 000 ing) upon the declarant at the above- gated pursuant to section 621 of the First Seneca Bank & Trust Co., stated address, and proof of service (by Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, a5 Oil City, Pa______600,000 affidavit or, in case of an attorney at law, amended, notice is hereby given that a The First National Bank of Mid certificate of registration1 as a voluntary land, Tex______500,000 by certificate) should be filed contem Capital National Bank, Houston, poraneously with the request. At any foreign aid agency has been issued by the Tex______350,000 time after said date, the declaration, as Advisory Committee on Voluntary For The Bradford National Bank, amended, may be permitted to become eign Aid of the Agency for International Bradford, Pa______300, 000 effective as provided in Rule 23 of the Development to the following agency: Republic National Bank of general rules and regulations promul Mizrachi Women’s Organization of America, Dallas, Tex______i ______12, 000, 000 gated under the Act, or the Commission Inc., 242 Park Avenue South, New York Franklin National Bank, New N.Y„ 10003. York, N.Y______v_____ 10,000,000 may grant exemption from such rules The Cleveland Trust’ Co., Cleve as provided in Rules 20(a) and 100 there H erbert J . W aters, land, Ohio______10, 000, 000 of or take such other action as it may Assistant Administrator for Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. Material Resources. of New York, N.Y______9,000,000 deem appropriate. M ay 31, 1966. Marine Midland Trust Co. of By the Commission. Western New York, Buffalo, [F.R. Doc. 66-6375; Filed, June 9, 1966; N.Y______7, 000, 000 [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, 8:46 a.m.] Pittsburgh National Bank, Pitts Secretary. burgh, Pa______5,500,000 Bank of California N.A., San [F.R. Doc. 66-6373; Filed, June 9, 1966; 1 Certificate of registration filed as part o Francisco, Calif-______5,000,000 8:46 a.m.] original document. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8187 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of the Secretary [Dept. Circ. 570; 1966 Revision] COMPANIES HOLDING CERTIFICATES OF AUTHORITY AS ACCEPTABLE SURETIES ON FEDERAL BONDS AND AS ACCEPTABLE REINSURING COMPANIES , ____ J une 1, 1966. This circular is published annually as of June 1, solely for the information of Federal bond-approving officers and persons required to give bonds to the United States. Interim changes in this circular are published in the F ederal R egister as tney The following companies, except where otherwise noted, have complied with the law and the regulations of the Treasury Department and are acceptable as sureties on Federal bonds, to the extent and with respect to the localities indicated opposite their respective names. isEALl J ohn K . Carlock, Fiscal Assistant Secretary of the Treasury. Companies Holding C ertificates of Authority F rom S ecretary of the T rea su ry U n der Act of C o n g ress, A pproved J u ly 30,194/ (6 U.S.C. 6-13) as Acceptable S u r e t ie s on F ed eral B onds (a) Underwriting limitations (net limit State in which incorporated and judicial districts in which Names of companies and locations on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact process agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo- of principal executive offices .risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ’ ration in capitals. Letters preceding names of States footnote (b). indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars) The Aetna Casualty and Surety Com 40,659 A ll...... CONN-—A.U except Guam. pany, Hartford, Conn. Aetna Insurance Company, Hartford, 12,961 All except Canal Zone, Kan. CONN.—AU except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Conn. Islands. Agricultural Insurance Company, 2,254 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N.Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Watertown, N.Y. seHL, Ind., Ky., Md., Miss., N.C., Okla., Puerto Rico, Tenn., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Allegheny Mutual Casualty Com 92 Alaska, Fla., Ind., Md., Mich., N.J., Ohio, Pa., Wis------PA.—D.C., sFla., filU., sind., Md., eMich., N.J., Ohio, pany, MeadviUe, Pa. eWis. Allied Mutual Insurance Company, 1,528 Ariz., Colo., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Nebr., N. Dak., IOWA—Ariz., Colo., D.C., Kans., Minn., Nebr., N.Dak., Des Moines, Iowa. S. Dak., Wyo. , ' S. Dak. American Automobile Insurance 3,975 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. MO.—AU except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Company, San Francisco, Cal. Islands. American Bonding Company, Los 45 Cal., Iowa, Nebr...... - ...... N EBR.—Cal., D.C., Iowa, Nev. Angeles, Cal. American Casualty Company of 3,370 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands------— PA.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands. Reading, Pennsylvania, Reading, Pa. American Credit Indemnity Com 2,103 Cal., Colo., Conn., Del., HI., Ind., Iowa, Ky., Me., Md., N.Y.—D.C. pany of New York, Baltimore, Md. Mass., Minn., Mo., N.H., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., Vt., Wash., W. Vja. American Employers’ Insurance Com 3,482 All except Guam______— ------MASS.—AU except Guam. pany, Boston, Mass. American Fidelity Company, Man 392 Conn., Iowa; Me., Mass., Miss., N.H., R.I., V t.» ...... VT.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Kan., Puerto Rico, chester, N.H. i Virgin Islands. American Fire and Casualty Com 381 Ala., Ark., Colo., D.C., Fla., Ga., Kans., Ky., La., Md., FLA .—Ala., Ark., Colo., D.C., Ga., Kans., Ky., La., Md., pany, Orlando, Fla. Miss., Mo., N.C., Okla., S.C.-, Tenn., Tex., Va. Miss., Mo., N.C., Okla., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va. American and Foreign Insurance 1,528 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam., La., Oreg., Puerto N.Y.—D.C., Tex. Company, New York, N.Y. Rico, Va., Virgin Islands. American General Insurance Com 18,788 Ala., Ariz., Ark., Colo., D.C., Fla., La., Miss., N. Mex., T E X .—AU except Conn., Del.,- Guam, Hawaii, Me., pany, Houston, Tex. Okla., Pa., Tex. Mass., Mich., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Puerto Rico, R.I., Vt., Virgin Islands. American Guarantee and Liability 1,152 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, N.Y.—Alaska, Cal., Conn., D.C., nFla., nsGa., nsHl., Insurance Company, Chicago, 111. Virgin Islands. nlnd., Me., Md., Mass., eMich., Minn., Mo., N.H., N.J., N. Mex., Ohio, Pa., nswTex., Vt. American Home Assurance Company, 1,894 Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., Del., D.C., Fla., N.Y.—D.C. New York, N.Y. Ga., Hawaii, HI., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H*, N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C. (fidelity only), S. Dak., Tex., Utah, Vt., Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. American Indemnity Company, Gal 540 Ala., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.C., Fla., Ga., HI., Ind., Iowa, T E X .—AU except Alaska, wArk., Canal Zone, Guam, veston, Tex. Kans., Ky., La., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Hawaii, wMich., nokla., Puerto Rieo, Virgin Islands, N. Mex., N.C., Ohio, Okla., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Va., wVa. Wis., Wyo. The American Insurance Company, 9,314 All except Canal Zone, Guam------— N.J.—AU except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Principal Office: Newark, N.J. Islands. ‘ _ Home Office: San Francisco, Cal. American Manufacturers Mutual 750 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., Oreg., N.Y.—AU except nAla., Ark., Canal Zone, Conn., Del., insurance Company, Chicago, 111. Puerto Rico, B.C., Tenn., Virgin Islands. Ga., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, slowa, Kans., La., Me., Md., Mo., Nebr., Nev., Oreg., mPa., Puerto Rico, 8.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va., Virgin Islands, wWis. American Motorists Insurance Com 1,228 All except Alaska, Del., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Oreg. ILL.—AU except Alaska, Ark., Canal Zone, Del., Guam, pany, Chicago, 111. Hawaii, Idaho, Nev., N. Mex., Oreg., Tenn., Virgin Islands, Wyo. American Mutual Liability Insur- 3,821 AU except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, MASS.—D.C. Wakefield, Mass. Virgin Islands. v Cnrim? National Fire Insurance 1,045 AU except Canal Zone, Conn.,'Del., Ga., Guam, Idaho, N.Y.—AU except Guam. Company, New York, N.Y. Kans., La., Me., Mass., Mich., N.J., N.C., Pa., Puerto Rico, S.C., S.. Dak., Tenn., Va., Virgin Islands, Wis. 6,112 AU except Canal Zone, Guam, N. Mex., Puerto Rico, N.Y.—AU except Guam. ^wTor®NIYUranCe ComPany, Virgin Islands. 2,363 Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.C., Idaho, HI., Ind., IND.—Ariz., Cal., Colo., D.C., IU., Iowa, Kans., Ky., ^ Ä pS ^ 1106 c°mPaay. Iowa, Kans., Ky., Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Mich., Mo., Ohio, Pa., W. Va., Wis. Nebr., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., Tenn., Wash., W. Va., Wis. ApSk,UCaî!SUranee ComPany> Menlo ~ 917 Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.C., Hawaii, CA.L— D.C., nGa., Idaho, eLa. Idaho, Hl.TTowa, La., Md., Mass., Minn., Miss., Mont., Nev;, N.J., N. Mex., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., S.C., Tex., Utah, Vt., Wash., Wyo. See footnotes at end of table. No. 112-----3 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8188 NOTICES C ompanies H olding C ertificates of A uthority F rom S ecretary of the T r ea su r y U m ber Act of Congress, A pproved J uly 30,1947 I U.S.C. 6-13) as Acceptable S u r et ies on F ed era l B onds (a)—Continued Underwriting limitations (net limit State in which incorporated and judicial districts in which Names of companies and locations on any one Stdtes and other areas in which licensed to transact proeess agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo of principal esecutive offices risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ration in capitals. Letters preceding names of States footnote (b).: indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars) Associated Indemnity Corporation, 1,158 All except Canal Zone, Guam...... - ...... CAL.—nAla., Ariz., D.C., sFla., eMo., Mont., Nebr., San Francisco, Cal. Nev., eN.Y.,'wOkla., Oreg., Tex., Utah, Wash. Atlantic Insurance Company, Dallas, 1,004 Ala., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Ga., 111., Ind., Kans., Md., Mo.,, T E X .—Ala., Ariz., Ark., Csd., Colo.,Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Tex. Nev., N. Mex,, N.C., Ohio, Okla., S.C., Tenn., Tex., Idaho, IU., Ind., nlowa, Kans., La., Mich., Mo., Nev,, Utah. N.J., N. Mex., N.C., Ohio, ©Ma„ ePa., S.C., Tenn., Utah. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Com 3,747 All except Ala., Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, La., Puerto N .Y.—D.C, pany, New York, N.Y. Bico, Virgin Islands. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 908 Ala., Fla., Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Mich., Minn., MICH.—D.C., neFla., III., Ind., Iowa, Minn., Mo., N. Lansing, Mich, Mo., Nebr., N.O., N. Dak., Ohio* Pa., S.C., S. Dak., Dak., Ohio, S. Dak. Tenn., Wis. Balboa Insurance Company, Los An 529 All except Ala., Ark., Canal Zone, Guam, Iowa, La., Me., CAL— D.C. - geles, Cai. Mass., Minn,, Miss., Nebr., N.H., N X , N.C., N. Dak., ■ Oreg., Puerto Bico, B.I., S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Bankers Multiple Line Insurance 579 All except Alaska, Canal Zone, DeL, Ga., Guam, Hawaii, IOWA—D.C. Company, Chicago, I1L Idaho, La., Me., N.H., Oreg., S.C., Tenn., Va., Virgin Islands. Bankers and Shippers Insurance Com 1,316 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Me., Puerto Bico, N.Y.—inAla., Ariz., Ark., Del., D.C., nFla., nGa., sind., pany of New York, New York, N.Y. Virgin Islands. slowa, eKy., Me., Mass., Mieli., Minn., sMiss., wMo., N.H., N X , sOhio, wOkla., B .I., S.Dak., nwTex., Wyo- Beneficial Fire and Casualty Insur 371 Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., D.C., 111., Ind., Md., Mich., CAL.—D.C. ance Company, Los Angeles, CaL Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., N .Y., Okla., Oreg., B.I., Utah, Wash., Wyo. Birmingham Fire Insurance Company 691 All except Ark., Canal Zone, Del., Ga., Guam, Hawaii, B A —D.C. of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pa. Idaho, Mass., N.H., N.J., Puerto Bico, S.C., Tex., Vir gin Islands. Boston Insurance Company, Boston, 2,130 AU except Canal Zone, Guam, Oreg------MASS.—All except Alaska, Guam, Canal Zone, Hawaii, Mass. Idaho, N. Dak., Oreg. The Buckeye Union Insurance Com 3,371 Ind., Ky,, Mich., Ohio, Pa., Va., W. Va------~Ij .______OHIO—D.C., 111., Ind., Ky., Mich., Minn., Pa., cTenn., pany, Columbus, Ohio.i Va., W. Va. Buffalo Insurance Company, Buffalo, 387 Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., D^C., Fla., Ga., N.Y.—D.C. N.Y. IU., Ind., Iowa, Me., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo. (fidelity only), Mont., New., Nev., N.H., N X , : N. Mex., N.Y., N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., B.I., 8.C. (fidelity only), 8. Dak., Utah (fideUty only), Vt., Wash., W. Va. (surety only), Wis., Wyo. The Camden Fire Insurance Associa 3,209 Ala. (fidelity only), Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Canal Zone, : N.J.—D.C. tion, Camden, N X Colo., Conn., D C., Hi., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Nev., N.H., N J., N. Mex., N.Y .,, N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Pa., B.I., S.C. (fideUty only), Utah, Vt., Va., W. Va., Wyo. Capitol Indemnity Corporation, 122 HI., Iowa, Mich., Minn., Wis...... W IS—D.C., nGa., 111., sind., Iowa, Mich., Minn., uMo. Madison, Wis. Cascade Insurance Company, 353 Cal., Idaho, Mont., Nev., Oreg., Utah, Wash------WASH.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Tacoma, Wash. Virgin Islands. The Celina Mutual Insurance Com 278 Colo., D.C., Hi., Ind., Kans., Ky., Md., Mich., Mo., OHIO—D.C. pany, Celina, Ohio. Ohio, Pa., Va., W. Va., Wis. Centennial Insurance Company, New 883 AU except Ala., Canal Zone, Guam, La., Puerto Bico, N.Y.—D.C. York, N.Y. Virgin Islands. Central Mutual Insurance Company, 1,296 AU except Ala., Ark., Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, La., OHIO—D.C. Van Wert, Ohio. Nebr., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Bico, S. Dak., Tenn., Tex.. Virgin Islands, Wis. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, 349 Ala., D.C, Fla., Ga., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio.------OHIO—mAla., D.C., sFla., nGa., sind., Ky. Cincinnati, Ohio. Citizens Casualty Company of New 159 All except Canal Zone, Guam, HawaU, Ohio, Virgin N.Y.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Virgin York, New York, N.Y. Islands. Islands. _ „ _ Citizens Insurance Company of New 998 AU except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Bico, Virgin Islands. N.J.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Jersey, Hartford, Conn. Bico, Virgin Islands. Commençai Insurance Company of 2,380 All except Puerto Bico...... -...... —¡¿ Ä ------! N.J.—All except Guam. Newark, N.J., New York, N.Y. Commercial Standard Insurance 534 Ala., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.G., Dl., Ind., Iowa. Kans., T E X .—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Company, Fort Worth, Tex. Ky., La., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., ! Minn., Miss., Puerto Bico, S. Dak., Virgin Islands. N. Mex., N.C., N. Dak., Okla., 8. Dak., Tenn., Tex., Utah., Va., Wash., Wis., Wyo. Commercial Union Insurance Com 13,152 AU except Canal Zone, Guam------N.Y.—All except Canal Zone, Guam. pany of New York, New York, N. Y.* The Connecticut Fire Insurance Com 8,306 AU excepi Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Bico, Virgin Islands. CONN.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, pany, Hartford, Conn. Puerto Bico; Virgin Islands. _ . The Connecticut Indemnity Com 983 AU except Alaska, Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, CONN—All except Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Canal «me, pany, Hartford, -Conn. Oreg., Puerto Bico, S.O., Va., Virgin Islands. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Mont., Nev., Oreg., Puerto Bico, Utah, Virgin Islands, Wash. Consolidated Insurance Company, In 164 IU., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio____ — ------...... IN D —D.G., HI., Ky., Midi., Ohio. dianapolis, Ind. Consolidated Mutual Insurance Com 932 AU except Ala., Alaska, Canal Zone, Del,, Guam, La., N .Y.—D.C. pany, Brooklyn, N.Y. S.C. Continental Casualty Company, Chi 35,822 ILL.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands. cago, ILL The Continental Insurance Company, 118, 391 N.Y.—All except Guam. New York, N.Y.* Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance 1,062 Ala., Ark., Cal., Conn., D.C., Fla^, Ga., HI., Ind., La., N.Y.—D.O. Company, New York, N.Y. Me., Md., Mass., Mich,, Mo., N.H., N X , N.Y., N.C., Okla., Pa., Puerto Bico, B.I., S.O., Tenn., Tex., Vt., Va., W. Va., Wis. Emmco Insurance Company, South 1,740 Ala., Ind., N.Y., Vt., Wyo...... IN D —D.C. Bend, Ind. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance 77 Alaska, Ariz., Colo., Ga., Ill,, Iowa, Minn., Miss., Mo., N EBB.—D.C. Company, Omaha, Nebr. Mont..Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak., Okla., S. Dak., Utah, Wash., Wyo. Employers Casualty Company, Dal 1,086 Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., T E X —D.O. las, Tex. Minn., Miss., Me., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., Tex., ; Utah, Wash., Wyo. The Employers’ Fire Insurance Com 1,843 AUexoept Guam, Virgin Islands...... —...... MASS.—All except Canal Zone, Guam.- pany, Boston, Mass. Employers Mutual Casualty Com 1,756 AU except Ala., Canal Zone, Conn., DeL, Fla., Ga,, Guam, IOWA—Alaska, Colo., D.C., 111., Ind., M^n, pany, Des Moines, Iowa. Hawaii, Ky., La,, Mass., Mont., Nev., Oreg., Puerto Miss., M o, Nebr., k.C ., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., oro- Bico, B.I., Tenn., Utah, Virgin Islands, W. Va. Pa., S.C., S. Dak., Wis. Employers Mutual Liability Insur 10,973 AU except Canal Zone, Virgin Islands...... W IS—D.C. ance Company of Wisconsin, Wausau, Wis. See footnotes at end of table. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 I NOTICES 8189 Companies H olding C ertificates of A uthority F rom Secreta ry of the 'Treasu ry U n der Act of Co n g ress, A pproved J uly 30,1947 (6 U.S.C; 0-13) as Acceptable Su r eties on F ed era l B onds (a)—Continued Underwriting limitations (net limit State in which incorporated and judicial districts in which Names of companies and locations on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact process agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo of principal executive offices risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ration in capitals. Letters preceding names of States footnote (b). indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars) Employers Reinsurance Corporation, 4,604 All except Canal Zone, -Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, M O —All except Guam. Kansas City, Mo. Virgin Islands. Equitable Fire and Marine Insurance 2,674 All except Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Canal Zone, Del., Ga., R.I.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Company, Hartford, Conn. Guam, Mont., Nev., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. S. Dak., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Export Insurance Company, Hous All except Canal Zone, Conn., D.C., Fla., Guam, Hawaii, N.Y.—D.C. ton, Tex. Ind., Kans., Ky., Me., Md., Mich., Nebr., N.J., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, S. Dak., Utah, Va., Virgin Islands, Wash., Wis. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance 215 Colo., HI., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Nebr., N. Dak., IOWA—Colo., D.C., 111., Kans., Nebr., Okla., S. Dak. Company, Des Moines, Iowa. Okla., S. Dak., Tex., Wis., Wyo. Farmers Mutual Rail Insurance Com 1,067 Iow a-..—...... -...... IOWA—D.C. pany of Iowa, Des Moines, Iowa. Federal Insurance Company, New 17,736 AU...... - ...... N.J.—All except Guam. York, N.Y. Federated Mutual Implement and 1,025 All except Alaska, Cal., Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, MINN.—Ala., Ark., D.C'., Fla., Ga., Ky., Miss., N.C., Hardware Insurance Company, Idaho, La., Me., Mass., Nev., Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, Okla., S.C., Tenn., Va., W. Va. Owatonna, Minn. Tex., Virgin Islands, Wis. The Fidelity and Casualty Company 17,876 All except Guam, Virgin Islands------!------N.Y.—All except Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands. of New York, New York, N.Y. Fidelity and Deposit Company of 8,135 All except Guam - -- --____-f— . . ------Md.—All except Guam. Maryland, Baltimore, Md. Fidelity-Phenix Insurance Company, 2,908 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands------; N.Y.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands. New York, N.Y. Firemen’s Fund Insurance Company, 18,000 All except Canal Zone______-— ------CAL.—All except Guam. San Francisco, Cal. « Firemen’s Insurance Company of 15,677 All except Puerto Rico------—...... —...... N J . —AllexceptjCanal Zone, Guam. Newark, N.J., New York, N.Y. First Insurance Company of Hawaii, 919 Guam, Hawaii, Oreg.______\______—______HAWAII—D.C, Ltd., Honolulu, Hawaii. Forum Insurance Company, Provi 520 All except Canal Zone, Colo., Fla., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, R.I.—D.C. dence, R.I. Mass., Miss., Mo., Puerto Rico, S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Virgin Islands. The Fulton Insurance Company, 273 All except Ala., Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Idaho, Puerto N .Y.—All except Ala., Canal Zone, Del., Ga., Guam, New York, N Y . Rico, Virgin Islands. Idaho, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, eWash. General Fire and Casualty Company, 671 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico_____i— -- N.Y.—D.C. New York, N.Y. General Insurance Company of Amer 15,976 All except Virgin Islands..-— ----— —---—---- —— —. WASH.—All except Pureto Rico, Virgin Islands. ica, Seattle, Wash. General Reinsurance Corporation, 9,545 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, N.Y.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands. New York, N.Y. Virgin Islands. Glens Falls Insurance Company, 5,906 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N.Y.—All except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Glens Falls, N.Y. Globe. Indemnity Company, New 6,783 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands-— — — N.Y.—All except Alaska, Guam, Virgin Islands. York, N.Y. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 915 All except Ala., Alaska, Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, IN D —Ark., Colo,, D.C.., 111., Iowa, Kans., Nebr., Ohio, Company, Indianapolis, Ind. Idaho, Me., Nev.', Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn., Virgin wOkla. Islands. Granite State Insurance Company, 495 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Oreg., N.H.—All except Guam, Puerto Rico. Manchester, N.H. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Great American Insurance Company, 28,756 All except Canal Zone, Guam.—...... N. Y.—All except Guam. New York, N.Y. Great Northern Insurance Company, 672 Arii., HI., Iowa, Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.Y., MINN.—D.C.,nsHl., Iowa, Mo., Mont., N. Dak., S. Dak., Minneapolis, Minn. N. Dak., S. Dak., Wis., Wyo. Wis. Greater New York Mutual Insurance 2,064 All except Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Canal Zone, Colo., Del., N .Y.—D.C. Company, New York, N.Y. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Kans., La., S.C., Tenn., Virgin Islands. Guarantee Insurance Company, Los 491 Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., Mich., Mont., Nev., N.J., C A L —D.C. Los Angeles, Cal. N. Mex., N.Y., N.C,, Okla., Tex., Utah, Va., Wash., Wyo. Gulf American Fire and Casualty 116 Ala., Fla., Ga., La., Miss., S.C., Tenn—______ALA.—Alaska, D.C., mnQa., SMiss. Company, Montgomery, Ala. Gulf Insurance Company, Dallas, Tex 7,746 Ala., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., Fla., Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, T E X .—Ala., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., Del., D. C., Fla., Ga., Kans., La., Md., Mich., Miss., Mo., Nebr., Nev., N. Idaho, 111., Ind., nlowa. Kans., La., Mich., Mo., N J., Mex., N.Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., S.C., Tenn., Tex., N. Mex., N.C,, Ohio, Okla., Pa., S.C., Tenn., Utah. Utah, Wash., Wyo. The Hanover Insurance Company, 5,029 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico...... ------___ N.Y.—All except Guam. New York, N.Y. Hardware Mutual Casualty Com 1,888 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. WIS.—D.C. pany, Stevens Point, Wis. Hartford Accident and Indemnity 30,369 All— ...... —————— ______-______1------CONN.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands. ^Company, Hartford, Conn. H^tford Fire Insurance Company, 66,494 All except Canal Zone..____- ____—______— ____ —— CONN.—Ariz., Cal., D.C., Hawaii, La., N.Y. Hartford. Conn. Hawkeye-Sectirity Insurance Com 798 Colo., D.C., Fla., Idaho, HI., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Md., IOWA—Colo., D.C., Fla., Hl., sind., Kans., wMich., pany, lies Moines, Iow,a. Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., Mo., Nebr., N. Mex., S. Dak., Wyo. Ohio, Pa., S. Dak., Utah, Va., Wyo. Highlands Insurance Company, 390 All except Canal Zone, Conn., Del.. Guam, Hawaii, TEX.—D.O, La. Houston, Tex. Idaho, Me., Mass., Minn., N.H., N .J., N.Y., Ohio, Puerto Rico, R.I., Vt., Virgin Islands, Wis. 5,341 All except Alaska, ' Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto N.Y.—All except Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, TNewHYwk,KYenmity Company’ Rico, Virgin Islands. Virgin Islands. TYorij01N y 15urapce Company, New 37,061 All except Canal Zone —:______—. N.Y.—Alaska, D.C., Puerto Rico. HS Ä Insurance Company- 126 Ariz., Fla., Ga., HI., Ind., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nev., Tenn.. ILL.—Ariz., D .p., sFla., Minn., Mont., wWash. HYort“ ¿YUrance ComPany. New 408 N.Y.___ — ____ 1__ - ...... — ...... N .Y.—D.C. I11^riL f i^ t'iTaal Insurance Co., 632 HI., Ind., Iowa, Ky., N. Mex., Ohio______... ILL.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin »pringfield, ill. Islands. w * ding ,aùd Surety Com- 55 Ind— ______— — . . — ...... - IND.—D.C. Jr& Indianapolis, Ind. Company, Indian- 647 111., Ind., Ky., Mich., Ohio_____!______IND.—D.C., 111., Ky., Mich., Ohio. 1,768 Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., Fla., Ga., Guam, Hawaii, CAL.—Alaska, Ariz., eArk., Colo., D.C., sFla., nGa., InÄ t Ä r ity Company’San Idaho, Hl., Ind., La., Md., Mich., Miss., Mo., Mont., Hawaii, Idaho, nlll., sind., eLa., Md., eMich., eMo., Nebr., Nev., N .J., N. Mex., N.C,, Okla., Oreg., S. Dak., Mont., Nebr., Nev,, N .J., N. Mex., wOkla., Oreg., Tenn., Tex., Utah., Wash., Wyo . S. Dak., Tex.J Utah, Wash., Wyo. See footnotes, at end of table. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8190 NOTICES C ompanies H olding Certificates of A uthority F rom S ecreta ry of the T rea su r y Un der Act of C ongress, A pproved J uly 30,1047 (6 U .S.C . 6-131 as A c ra w ™ . S u r et ies on F ed er a l B onds (a)—Continued ’ VBI E Underwriting limitations (net limit State In which incorporated and judicial districts in which Names of companies and locations on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact process agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo of principal executive offices risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ration in capitals. Letters preceding names of State footnote (b). indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars) Inland Insurance Company, Lincoln, Iowa, Minn., Nebr., S. Dde. N EBR.—Ariz., Ark., Colo., D.C., 111., Iowa, Kans Ky Nebr; Minn., eMo., Mont., Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak.. Ohio’ Okla., Oreg., 8. Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo. ’ Insurance Company of North Amer 86,828 All except Guam. PA.—All except Guam. ica, Philadelphia, Pa. The Insurance Company of the State 085 Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., DeL,.D.C., Fla., PA.—D.C,.. of Pennsylvania, New York, N.Y. Ga., Hawaii, Hi., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont,, Nebr., Nev., N.H., N.J.. N. Mex., N;Y., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Pa., R.I., S.C. (fidelity only), Tex., Utah, Vt., Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. International Fidelity Insurance Com 50 Mass., Mich., N .J., N .Y,, P a ..______N.J.—All except Alaska, Guam, Virgin Islands. pany, Newark, N.J. International Service Insurance Com 443 Alaska, Canal Zone, N. Mex., Tex______T E X .—D.C. pany, Fort Worth, Tex. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company, 403 Colo., Fla., HI., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., IOWA—nAla., Colo., D.C., sill., Kans., Minn., Mont., De Witt, Iowa. N. Mex., N.C., N. Dak., Okla., S.C., S. Dak., Wis., Nebr., wN.C., wOkla., Oreg., 8. Dak. Wyo. Jersey Insurance Company of New 871 All except Alaska, Ariz., Canal Zone, Del., Guam, N.Y.—nAla., Ariz., Ark., D.C., nFla., nGa., sind., slows, York, New York, N.Y. Hawaii, Me., Nev., N.H., N. Mex., N. Dak., Puerto eKy., Mass., Mich- Minn., sMiss., wMo., N J., Ohio, Rico, Vt., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wyo. wOkla., R.I., 8. Dak., nwTex. Kansas City Fire and Marine In 356 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, MO.—Ala., Alaska, Ark., Colo., D.C,, Fla., Ga., 111., surance Company, Glens Falls, Virgin Islands. Iowa, Kans., Minn., Nebr., Okla., S.C., Tex., Va., N.Y. Wis., Wyo. Lawyers Surety Corporation, Dallas, 61 Tex______T E X —D.C. Tex. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 10,714 All except Guam__.__ll______,______MASS.—-AH except Canal Zone, Guam. Boston, Mass. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Com 6,750 All except'Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. ILL.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, wLa., pany, Chicago, 111. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Maine Bonding and Casualty Com 364 Conn., Fla., Me., Md., Mass., N.H., N .Y., R.I., Tenn., M E.—Conn., D.C., Mass., N.H., R.I., Vt. pany, Portland, Me. Tex., Vt., Va. The Manhattan Fire and Marine 1,310 All except Canal Zone, Conn.,-Del., Guam, La., Me., N.Y.—D.C. Insurance Company, New York, Mass., N. Dak., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn., Virgin N.Y. Islands. Maryland American General Insur 1,020 N. Mex., Okla., Tex______;______T E X .—D.C. ance Company, Houston, Tex. Maryland Casualty Company, Balti 14,073 All except Guam______— — ___------MD.—All except Guam. more, Md. Maryland National Insurance Com 172 Ala., Ariz., Ark., Colo., Fla., Ga., HI., Ind., Ky., La., MD.—All except sAla., Alaska, sCal., Canal Zone, Cole., pany, Bel Air, Md. Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., Nebr., Nev., N. Dak., Ohio, Guam, Hawaii, Me.,. N.H,» N.Y., N.Ö., Puerto Rico, Okla., Oreg., Pa., 8. Dak., Tenn., Tex., Va., Wash., wS.C., wTex., Virgin Islands. W. Va. Massachusetts Bay Insurance Com 347 Colo., D.C., Fla., Ga., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Me., Md., MASS.—Colo., D.G., Ga., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Me., pany, Boston, Mass. Mass., Mo., N.H., N .Y., R.I., Tex., Vt., Wis., Wyo. Md., N.H., R.I., Tex., Vt., Wis., Wyo. ^ Merchants Mutual Bonding Com 37 Iowa, Kans., Mont., Nebr., Okla., Tex______:____ IOWA—D.C., sill., Nebr. pany, Des Moines, Iowa. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance 1,058 All except Ala., Alaska, Ariz., Canal Zone, Ga., Guam, MICH.—eArk., Cal., Colo., D.C., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Company, Lansing, Midi. Hawaii, Idaho, La., Nev,, N. Mex., Oreg., Puerto Rico, eKy., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., nwN.Y., N. 8.C., Virgin Islands, Wyo. Dak., Ohio, wOkla., S. Dak., wmTenn., Utah, wWash. Michigan Mutual Liability Company, 1,115 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, Me., Minn., MICH.—D.C. Detroit, Midi. Oreg., Puerto Rico, Tex., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wyo. Mid-Century Insurance Company, 868 All except Ala., Alaska, Canal Zone, Conn., D.C., Guam, CAL.—Ariz., Ark., Colo., D.C., Idaho, 111., Ind., Iowa, Los Angèles, Cal. Hawaii, Idaho, Ky., La., Me., Md., Mass., Miss., N.H., Kans., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev.,N. Me*., N. Mex., N .Y., N.C., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., N. Dak., Okla., Oreg., 8. Dak., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wis., ~ Tenn., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Wyo. The Millers Mutual Fire Insurance 275 Ga., Ind., N .Y., N.C., Pa., S.C., Tex. (surety only), Vt., P A —D.C. Company, Harrisburg, Pa. W. Va. (surety only). The Millers Mutual Fire Insurance 481 All except Ala., Alaska, Canal Zone, Conn., Del., Guam, T E X .—All except Ala., Alaska, Canal Zone, Conn., Del, Company of Texas, Fort Worth, Hawaii, Idaho, Me., Md., Nev., N .J., N.C., Puerto Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Me., Md., Nev., N.H., N.J., Tex. Rico, R.I., S.C., Vt., Virgin Islands, Wash., W. Va., N.C., mPa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., Vt., Va., Virgin Wyo. Islands, Wash., W. Va., eWis., Wyo. „ Millers’ Mutual Insurance Associa 1,476 Ark., Colo., Fla., Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Md., Mich., I L L —nmAla., Ark., Colo., D.C., Ind., Iowa, Kans., tion of Illinois, Alton, Hi. Minn., Mo., Mont., N .Y., N.G., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., Minn., Mo., MOnt., N. Dak., 8. Dak. Pa., S.C., S. Dak., Tex., Vt., Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Millers National Insurance Company, 317 All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., ILL.—Ariz., sCal.. Colo., D.C., Ind., Iowa, Kims., Ky., Chicago, 111. Me., Miss., N.H., Puerto Rico, Vt., Virgin Islands. Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak., R.I., 8. Dak., nwsTex., Utah, wWis., Wyo. Mutual Boiler and Machinery Insur 1,640 Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Çolo., Conn., D.C., Ind., Iowa, Ky., MASS.—D.C. ance Company, Watham, Mass. Mass., Mich., Minn., Mont., Nev., N.H., N .J., N„ Mex., N.Y., N.C., R.I., Tex., Utah, Vt., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. National Automobile and Casualty 353 Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., Idaho, 111., Ind., Kans., Ky., CAL.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Insurance Company, Los Angeles, La., Mich., Mo., Mont., Nev., N. Mex., Okla., Oreg., Rico, Virgin Islands. Cal. Tenn., Tex., Utah, Wash., Wyo. National-Ben Franklin Insurance 1,368 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Oreg., Puerto PA.—D.C., Md. Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., New Rico, Virgin Islands. York, N.Y. National Casualty Company, Detroit, 1,000 All except Ala., Ariz., Ark., Canal Zone, Conn., D.C., M ICH.—AU except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Mich. Fla., Guam, Hawaii, Iowa, Kans., Me., Miss., Nev,, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. N. Mex., N.C., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Puerto Rico, 8.C., 8. Dak., Tex., Va., Virgin Islands. National Fire Insurance Company of 11,038 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands______CONN.— All except Ariz., Canal Zone, Guam, Nev., Hartford, Chicago, IÜ. Virgin Islands. „.„„¡i National Grange Mutual Insurance 2,174 Conn., Fla., Me., Mass., N.H., N .J., N.Y., Ohio, Pa., N.H.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawau, Company, Keene, N.H. R.I., S.C - Tenn., Vt., W. Va. Virgin Islands. _ Hawaii National Indemnity Company, 451 All except Canal Zone, Conn., Fla., Ga., Guam, Hawaii, N EBR .— AU except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, tiawau, Omaha, Nebr. Me., Mass., N.H., N .J., N .Y., Ohio, Oreg., Puerto Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Rico, R.I., S.C - Vt., Virgin Islands. The National Reinsurance Corpora 3,006 All except Ala., Canal Zone, Fla., Guam, Ga., La., Me., N .Y.— D.C., sOhio. tion, New York, N.Y. Miss., Mo., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S,C„ 8. Dak., Tenn., Va,, Virgin Islands. National Standard Insurance Com 286 La., N. Mex., Tex. ______TEX.—D.C. pany, Houston, Tex. National Surety Corporation, Princi 6,235 All except Guam______,.r_.______N .Y.—All except Guam. pal Office: New York, N .Y., Home Office: San Francisco, Cal. See footnotes at end of table. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8191 Companies H olding Certificate» of A uthority F rom Secreta ry of th e T r ea su r y U nder Act of C o n g ress, A pproved J uly 30, 1947 (6 U S C. 6-13) as Acceptable S u r eties on F ed eral B onds (a)—Continued Underwriting limitations (net limit State in which incorporated and judicial districts in which Names of companies and locations on any one States and other areas in. which licensed to transact process agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo of principal executive offices risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ration in capitals. Letters preceding names of States footnote (b) indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars) National Union Fire Insurance Com 2,477 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. PA.— All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, pany of Pittsburgh, Pa., Pittsburgh, Virgin Islands. Pa. National Union Indemnity Company, 603 All except Ark., Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Me., PA.— All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Pittsburgh, Pa. Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Virgin Islands. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Com 1,622 Allexoept Cal., Canal Zone, Guam Hawaii, Wis______OHIO—D.C. pany, Columbus, Ohio. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, 5,533 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Idaho, Virgin Islands.. N.Y.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands. Hartford, Conn'. New Hampshire Insurance Company, 3,892 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Va______N.H.—All except Guam. Manchester, N.H. New York Underwriters Insurance 2,340 ARexoept Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands N.Y.—AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Company, New York, N.Y. Islands. Newark Insurance Company, New 1,918 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin N.J.—All except Alaska, nCal., Canal Zone, Guam, York, N.Y. Islands. Hawaii, Idaho, Virgin Islands, Wyo. Niagara Fire Insurance Company, 5,230 AH except Canal Zone, Guam______N.Y.—All except Canal Zone, Guam. New York, N.Y. North American Reinsurance Corpo 3,643 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands N .Y.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin ration, New York, N.Y. Islands. The North River Insurance Com 6,234 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Vir N.Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, pany, New York, N.Y. gin Islands. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. North Star Reinsurance Corporation, 318 Ark., Cal., D.C., 111., Iowa, Kans., Mich., Nev., N.H N.Y.—D.C. New York, N.Y. N .L N.Y., Utah, W. Va. Northeastern Insurance Company of 834 Cal., Colo., Conn., 111., Iowa, Kans., Mich., N.H., N.J. CONN.—D.C. Hartford, Des Mo es, Iowa. N .Y ., Ohio, Okla., Tex. The Northern Assurance Company 1,331 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands______MASS.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Minn., Virgin of America, Boston, Mass. Islands, sW. Va. Northern Insurance Company of New 4,720 All except Canal Zone, Fla., Guam, Hawaii, La., N.H., N .Y.—D.C., Me. York, New York, N.Y. Oreg., Puerto Rico, 8.C., Term., Va., Virgin Islands! Northwestern National Casualty 568 Ala., Ariz., Cal., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., K y., Minn., Mo., WIS.—Cal., D.C., mnFla., Idaho, HI., Kans., wLa., Minn . Company, Milwaukee, Wis. Mont., Nebr., N. Mex., Okla., Pa., R.I., Tex., Wis. Mo., Nebr., nwOkla., R.I., Vt., W. Va. Northwestern National Insurance 4,059 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands______Company, Milwaukee, Wis. WIS.—AH except Canal Zone, nmFla., Guam, Idaho, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Com wLa., Puerto Rico, Vt., Virgin Islands: 3,750 All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho OHIO—AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Virgin pany, Hamilton, Ohio. Me., N .Y., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Islands. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company, 1,740 Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., Del., D.C., 111., Ind., Iowa., Md. LeRoy, Ohio. OHIO—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Mass., Mich., Minn., Mo., Nev., N.J., N.Y., N. Dak. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Ohio, Pa., R.I., 8. Dak., Va., W. Va., Wis. Old Colony Insurance Company, 717 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Oreg., Virgin Boston, Mass. MASS.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Islands. Idaho, Nev., N. Dak., Oreg., Virgin Islands. Olympic Insurance Company, Los 476 All except Ala., Ark., Canal Zone, Del., D.C., Fla., Ga. CAL.—D.C. Angeles, Cal. . Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, La., Me., Md., Mass., N.H.! N .J., N .Y., N.C., Ohio, Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., 8. Dak., Tenn., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W . Va. Oregon Automobile Insurance Com 461 CaL, Hawaii, Idaho, Nev., Oreg., Utah, W ash;______pany, Portland, Oreg. OREG.—Cal., D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Nev., Utah, Wash. Pacific ■ Employers Insurance Com 1,033 AH except Ala., Ark., Canal Zone, Conn., D.C., Fla., Ga., pany, Los Angeles, Cal. CAL.—Ariz., Conn., Del., D.C., sFla., wKy., Md.., Mass., Guam, Hawaii* Ky., La., Me., Md., Mass., Mich., N. Mex., N .Y., Ohio, R.I., wTex., W. Va., Wis. * N.H., N .Y,, N.O., N. Dak., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Pacific Indemnity Company, Los 2,982 Angeles, CaL AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. CAL.—All except Conn., Guam, Me., N.H., Vt., Virgin Islands. Pacific Insurance Company, Limited, 789 Hawaii______Honolulu, Hawaii. HAWAII—D.C. iR^ance Company of New 1,945 rork, New York, N.Y. All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Me., Nev., N.Y.—niAla., Ariz.,; Ark., Del., D.C., nFla., nGa., sind., N.H., N. Dak., Puerto Rico, 8. Dak., Vt.. Virgin slowa, eKy., Me., Mass., Mich., Minn., sMiss., wMo. Islands, W. Va., Wyo. N.J», sOhio, wOkla., R.I., S. Dak., nwTer., Wyo. *nsurance Company, Keene, 742 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, N.H.—AH except Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands. Virgin Islands. *rc^-?e°gaylyaPla Insurance Com 2,417 pany, New York, N.Y. All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico.___ _ PA.—AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico. eunsylvania Manufacturers' Assocl- 1,908 Del., D E., Md., N.J., N.Y., Pa., W. Va...... PA.—D.C. d S h iM ^ aaCe ComPany. PWla- PS ylnania MiIlera Mutual Insur- 1,046 D.C., Pa...... PA.—D.C. • WUkes'BarreA Pa- National Mutual 6asu- 1,027 Ala., Del., D.C., Ga., IU., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., Md., PA. D.C., Kans., Md., Mo., N.J., N.C., Okla.. Tenn Ntfg,1pa anCe Company> Harris- Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., N.J., N.C., Ohio, Va. Okla., Pa., R .L, S.Ö., Term., Tex., Utah. Vt., Va.. W . Va., Wis. ' PY6rk^New*York N ? “ 7 °f NeW 1,828 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands....______N.Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico. Virgin Islands. Com*)an3r' 15,372 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. CONN.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, c°mpany' p ^ 1,697 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. WIS.—AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands. P° d 5 ^ P aUranCe ComPan7. PWla- 5,298 Ala. (fidelity only), Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., D.C., Fla., PA.—AH except Ala;, Alaska, Ariz., Ark., Canal Zone, Ga., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., La., Md., Mass., Del., sGa., Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, eHl., nlnd., nlowa Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., N.J., N. Mex., N.Y., eKy., Me., nMiss., Mont., Nev., N.H., N. Dak., eOkla . N.G., Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., R.I., 8.C. (fidelity only), Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., S.Dak., wTex., Vt., Va . Virgin Tenn., Tex., Utah, Va., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Islands. Pc S a u v Insurance 1,759 All except Canal Zone, Del,, Guam, Idaho, La., Oreg., R.I.—1Conn., D.C., Mass., N.H., N.J., N.Y., Pa., Vt. Thfl iw ?y\fr C-PaS^ew ^yN .^06 1,962 Conn., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Idaho, 111., Iowa, Me., Md., N.Y.—D.C., sFla., ePá., wTex. Mass., Mich., N.H., N J., N.Y., N.C., Pa., R.I., Vt., Va., W. Va., Wis. Ameri' 4,997 AH except Canal Zone, Guam, Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin York?N:YnPMly °f Islands. N .Y —All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii. Y o r k f ^ ^ g ^ t t o n of New Idaho, Virgin Islands, Wyo. 3,429 Alaska, Ark., Cal., Colo., Del., D.C., Ga., Idaho, HI., N.Y.—D.C. Ind., Iowa, Kans. (reinsurance only), Ky., La. (reinsur ance only), Me., Md., Mass, (reinsurance only), Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N.H. (reinsur ance only), N.J., N.Y., N.C., N. Dak.. Ohio, Okla., R-I-, S.C., Tex. (reinsurance only), Utah (reinsurance only);Vt., Va. (reinsurance only), Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. at end of table* FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8192 NOTICES C ompanies H olding Certificates of Authority F rom S ecretary of the T rea su ry U n der Act of C ongress, A pproved J uly 30,1947 (6 U.S.C. 6-13) as Acceptable S u r eties on F ed eral B onds (a)—Continued Underwriting limitations (net limit State in which incorporated and judicial districts in whicii Names of companies and locations on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact process agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo of principal executive offices risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ration in capitals. Letters preceding names of States footnote (b). indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In' thousands of dollars) Reliance Insurance Company, Phila 20,755 All except Canal Zone, Guam______.... ______PA;—All except Canal Zone, Guam. delphia, Pa. Republic Insurance Company, Dallas, 2,823 All except Ala., Alaska, Canal Zone, Del., Fla, Ga., T E X .—D.C. Tex. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Ky., Me., Mass.. Mont., Nev., N.H., N. Dak., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Utah, Vt., Virgin Islands, Wyo. Resolute Insurance Company, Hart 306 All except Canal Zone, Guam, La., N.Y., Virgin Islands. R.I.—All except wArk., Canal Zone, mGa, Guam, Hawaii, ford, Conn. La., Me., wMich., nMiss., nwN.Y., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., S. Dak., weTenn., Utah, Vt., wVa., Virgin Islands, nW. Va., wWis. Royal Indemnity Company, New 5,299 All______...... N .Y.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands. York, N.Y. Safeguard Insurance Company, New 1,780 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin CONN.—All except Ark., Canal Zone, Ga., Guam, Ky,, York, N.Y. Islands. La., Miss., N.C., Okla., Puerto Rico, S.C., Tenn., nweTex.. Vt., Virgin Islands, wVa., W. Va. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance 27,194 All except Canal Zone, Guam______MINN.—All except Guam. Company, St. Paul, Minn. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, 3,067 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. MINN.—All except Guam. St. Paul, Minn. Seaboard Surety Company, New York, 2,884 N .Y.—All except Guam. N.Y. Security Insurance Company of Hart 6,319 . All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, Miss., Oreg., CONN. ford, Hartford, Conn.® Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Security Mutual Casualty Company; 1,035 All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto ILL.—D.C. Chicago, 111. Rico, Virgin Islands. Security National Insurance Com 354 Ark., Ôàl., Colo., Ind., Mich., Okla., Tex______T E X .—XA11 except Canal Zone, Guam, Mont. pany, Dallas, Tex. Select Insurance Company, Dallas, 566 Colo., Fla., Tex., Wyo______T E X .—Ala., Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., Tex. Idaho, 111., Ind., nlowa, Kans., La., Mich., Nev., N.J., N. Mex., N.C., Okla., Pa., S.C., Tenn., Utah, Wyo. Southern General Insurance Com 225 Ark., Cal., Colo., Del., D.C., Fla., Ga., 111., Ind., Md., GA.—Ariz., Cal., D.C., nsFla., nlnd., M.d., sMiss., N.J., pany, Allentown, Pa. Miss., Mo., N.J., N.C., Pa., R.I., S.C., Tex., Utah, nwN.C., ePa., enTex. Wash., Wis. The Standard Fire Insurance Com 2,539 All except Ala., Canal Zone, Del., Guam, La., N.J., CONN.—Ala., Ariz., Ark., nCal., Del., D.C., Hawaii, pany, Hartford, Conn. Puerto Rico, Tenn., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Idaho, Ind., slowa, Kans., Ky., Me., Md., sMiss., wMo., Mont., Nebr;, N.H., N.J., nesN.Y., nOhio, Okla., Oreg., YvPa., nesTex. State Automobile Mutual Insurance 1,764 Ala., Fla., Ga., Ind., Kans., Ky., Md., Mich., Miss., Mo., OHIO—D.C., Ky., Md., Mich., Tenn., W. Va. Company, Columbus, Ohio. N.J., N.C., Ohio, Pa., S.C., Tenn., W. Va. State Fire and Casualty Company, 183 Alaska, D.C., Fla., Ind., Ky., La., Md., Miss., Nev., FLA.—D.C. Miami, Fla. Okla. Sta’te Surety Company,’ Des Moines, 53 Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Nebr., S. Dak______IOWA—eArk., D.C., sFla., HI., Kans., eLa., wMich., Iowa. Minn., Mo., Nebr., N. Dak., nOhio, nOkla., S. Dak. Statesman Insurance Company, Indi 123 Ala., 111., Ind., Iowa, Md., Pa., Tenn______IND.—Colo., D.C., 111., nlowa, Kans., eLa., Minn., wMo, anapolis, Ind. Nebr., wnPa., S. Daki The Stuyvesant Insurance Company, 515 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Virgin Islands___ N.Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Allentown, Pa. Virgin Islands. The Summit Fidelity and Surety 78 All except Ark., Cal., Canal Zone, Conn., D.C., Ga., OHIO—D.C. Company, Chicago, 111. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Me., Md., Mass., Mont., N.H., N.Y., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, R.I.,- S.C., S. Dak., Tex., Virgin Islands, W. Va. Sun Insurance Company of New 1,099 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, La., Miss., N .Ÿ.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, York, New York, N.Y. Puerto Rico, S.C.. Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Superior Insurance Company, Indi 530 Ala., Ariz., Cal., Colo., Fla., Ga.,. Ind., Kans., Mich., T E X —sCal., Colo., D.C., Okla. anapolis, Ind. N. Mex., Okla., Tex., Utah, Wyo. Superior Risk Insurance Company, 747 Ariz., Cal., Colo., Conn., Del., D.C., 111., Ind., Iowa, OHIO—All except Alaska, Canab Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Leroy, Ohio. Ky., Md., Mass., Mich., Minn., Nev., N .J., N .Y., Ohio, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Pa., R.I., Va., W. Va., Wis. Traders & General Insurance Com 137 Colo., Kans., Là., Miss., Mo., N. Mex., Okla., Tex...... rEX.—D.C. pany, Dallas, Tex. Transamerica Insurance Company, 5,969 DAL.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Virgin Islands. Los Angeles, Cal. Transcontinental Insurance Com 3,363 All except Canal Zone, Del., Guam, Hawaii, La., Oreg., ST.Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Del., nsGa., Guam, pany, Chicago, HI. Virgin Islands. Hawaii, La., Miss., Oreg., Puerto Rico, S.C., Vt., virg Islands, Transit Casualty Company, St. 348 Ala., Alaska, Cal., Colo., D.C., Hawaii, 111., Ind., Iowa, w n -n n Louis, Mo. Kans., Ky., Md., Mich., Miss., Mo., Mont., Nebr., Nev., N .J., N.C., N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., R.I., i.C . (fidelity only), Tex., Utah, Vt., Wash., W. Va., Wis., Wyo. Transport Indemnity Company, Los 839 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands.. DAL.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam. e^Jn’ Angeles, Cal. eLa., eMiss., Nev., nwN.Y., eOhio, eOkla., Puerto . nTenn., wVa., Virgin Islands, W. Va. r Transportation Insurance Company, 930 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, S.C., ILL.—All except Alaska, nCal., Canal Zone, Conn., Chicago, 111. • Virgin Islands. sFla., Guam, Hawaii, eKy., M in n ., wMo., Nev., wN.if., Ohio, ePa., Puerto Rico, S. Dak,, Virgin Islands, wWash., nW. Va., Wis. The Travelers Indemnity Company, 21,000 DONN—All except Guam. Hartford, Conn. Trinity Universal Insurance Com 2,014 All except Alaska, Canal, Zone, Conn., Del., Guam, pany, Dallas, Tex. Hawaii, Idaho, Me., Md., Mass., Mont-, Nev., N.H., N .J., N .Y., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., T«fih., Utah, Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wyo. Tri-State Insurance Company, Tulsa, 336 All except Cal., Canal Zone, Conn., Del., D.C., Guam, >KLA.—All except Cal., Canal Zone, Conn., Del., u Okla. Hawaii, Me., Md., Mass., Mich., N.H., N .J., N.Y., Hawaii, Me., Md., Mass., Mich.,. N.H., N .J., r . N.C., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rios, R.I., S.C., Vt., N.C., Ohio, Oreg., Pa., Puerto Rico, R.L, Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va., Wis. Twin City Fire Insurance Company, 803 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Hartford, Conn. Islands. United Pacific Insurance Company, 1,912 Allexcept Ala., Canal Zone, Conn., Del., Ga., Guam, La., WASH.—All except Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Bw». Tacoma, Wash. Me., Md., Mass., N .J., N.C., Pa„ Puerto Rico, R.I., • Virgin Islands. S.C., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va. United States Casualty Company, 1,406 Allexcept Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii______N .Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, whs. Hartford, Conn. United States Fidelity and Guaranty 40,672 MD.—All except Guam. Company, Baltimore, M d .c Hawaii United States Fire Insurance Com ' 10,641 Allexcept Canal Zone, Guar».-, Virgin Islands______N .Y.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, pany, New York, N.Y. Virgin Islands. See footnotes a t end of table. FEDERAL REGISTER. VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8193 Companies H olding Certificates of A uthority F rom Sec reta ry of the T rea su r y U n der Act of C ongress, A pproved J uly 30,1947 (6 U.S.C. 6-13) as Acceptable S u r et ies on F ed era l B onds (a)—Continued Underwriting limitations (net limit State in which incorporated and judicial districts in which Names of companies and locations on any one States and other areas in which licensed to transact process agents have been appointed. (State of incorpo of principal executive offices risk). See a fidelity and surety business. See footnote (c) ration in espitáis. Letters preceding names of States footnote (b). indicate judicial districts.) See footnote (d) (In thousands of dollars) Universal Surety Company, Lincoln, 226 Ariz., Colo., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo., Mont., Nebr., N EBR.—Ariz., .Colo., D.C., Iowa, Kans., Minn., Mo,, Nebr. N. Mex., N. Dak-., Ohio, Okla., 8. Dak., Utah, Wash., Mont., N. Mex., N. Dak., wOkla., S. Dak., nTex., Wyo. V Utah, Wyo. Utica Mutual Insurance Company, 1,956 All except Alaska, Ark., Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, N .Y.—All exdept Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam,. Hawaii, Utica, N.Y. Kans., La., Mich., Oreg., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Me., Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Valley Forge Insurance Company, 1,256 All excejpt Alaska, Ariz,, Cal., Canal Zone, Conn., Fla., PA.—All except Guam, Virgin Islands, Wis. Reading, Pa. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Kans., Ky., La., Me., Nebr., N.H., N. Mex., N.C., Oreg., Puerto Rico, R.I., S.C., S. Dak., Tenn., Virgin Islands, Wyo. Vigilant Insurance Company, New 1,687 All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Virgin N.Y.—All except Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, York, N.Y. Islands. Virgin Islands. West American Insurance Company, 680 Ariz., Ark., Cal., Colo., D.C. 111., Ind., Iowa. Kans., Ky., CAL.—Ala., Colo., D.C., Fla., Ga., HI., Ind., Iowa, Hamilton, Ohio. La., Md., Mich., Minn., Mo., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex., Kans., Ky.,eLa., Md., Mich., Minn., Mo.,Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak.,/Ohio, Okla., Oreg., Pa., Utah, Va., Wash., N. Dak., Ohio, nOkla., Greg., Pa., mTenn., Ter., Utah, Wis., Wyb. Va., Wadi., Wis., Wyo. Westchester Fire Insurance Com 6,222 All except Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, N .Y.—AIL except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, pany, New York, N.Y. Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. The Western Casualty Mid Surety 3,209 AD. except Alaska, Canal Zone, Conn., Del., Guam, KANS.—All except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands; Company, Fort Scott, Kans. Hawaii, Me., Mass., N.H., N .Y., N.C., Pa., Puerto Rico, R .I., Vt., Va., Virgin Islands, W. Va. The Western Fire Insurance Com 1,718 Ariz., Ark., CaL, Colo., Fla., 111., Ind., Iowa, Kans., Ky., KANS.—All except Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. pany, Fort Scott, Kans. Mich., Minn., Miss., Mo., Nebr., Nev., N. Mex.. N .Y,, N. Dak., Ohio, Okla., S. Dak., Tenn., Utah, Wash., Wis., Wyo. Western Pacific Insurance Company, 233 Alaska, Ariz., Colo., Idaho, Mont., Nev., Oreg., Utah, WASH.—Alaska, Ariz., Cal., Colo., D.C„ Idaho, wMich., Seattle, Wash. Wash., Wyo. Mont., Nev., N . Mex., sN.Y., Oreg., Utah, Wyo. Western Surety Company, Sioux 800 All except Alaska, Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Me., N.H. S. DAK.—All except Alaska, Canal Zone", Guam, Hawaii, Falls, S. Dak. N .Y ., N.C., Puerto Rico, S.O., Virgin Islands. Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. Wolverine Insurance Company, Bat 539 Alaska, Ark., Cal., Fla., Ga. (surety only), 111., Ind., Iowa, MICH.—D.O., Ga., 111.,Ind., Iowa, Minn., Ohio, S. Dak. tle, Creek, Mich. Mich., Minn., Nebr., -Nev., N. Mex., N. Dak., Ohio, Pa., Vt., W. Va., Wyo. The Yorkshire Insurance Company of 573 All except Ark., Canal Zone, Guam, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, N.Y.—All except Alaska, Guam, Puerto Rico, Virgin New York, New York, N.Y. S. Dak., Virgin Islands. Islands. Companies H olding Certificates of Authority F rom the S ecretary of the T rea su ry as Acceptable R einsuring Companies U n der T rea su r y C ircular N o. 297 D ated J u ly 5, 1922, a s Amended Underwriting Judicial Dis limitations tricts in which Names of companies (net limit on process agents any one risk). have been (In thousands appointed of dollars) Accident and Casualty Insurance Company of Winterthur, Switzerland (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)______1,348 D.C. •«mance Assurance Company, Ltd., London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y.)...... 683 D.C, Ä.tlast"fsHrance Company, Limfted, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)_____!____.______706 D.C. Jj^mfiation Insurance Company, New York, N .Y...... ______£______970 D.C. ine Employers’ Liability Assurance Corporation, Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, Boston, Mass.)______7,278 D.C. Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, limited, Perth, Scotland (U.S. Office, Philadelphia, Pa.)_ 10,942 D.C. wnerai Security Assurance Corporation of New York, New York, N .Y ______451 D.C. mi" Guarantee Company of North America, Montreal, Canada (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 102 D.C. r!S r® ^ oa Assurance, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)______•______« 862 D.C. Th» T Guarantee and Accident Company, Ltd., London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y.)______1,234 D.C. Th» * Lancashire Insurance Company, Ltd., London, England (U.S. Office, New York, NY)... ___ 770 D.C. Insurance Company, Ltd., London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y.)______533 D.C. 214 D.C. ThThr»;!. 61,nsuJrance Company, Munich, Germany (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 1,048 D.C. p™ , ?"‘erlands Insurance Company, Est. 1845, The Hague, Holland (U.S. Office, Keene, N.H.) „ ...... 536 D.C. Thflfl»T?ar3ncB Company, Limited, Liverpool, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y.)...... 3,772 D.G. Th» Company, Limited, of Liverpool, Engjand (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)...... 813 D.C. Sim T,vw a lQ®^rance Company, Stockholm, Sweden (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)______990 D.C. SwtanKuSiS Limited, London, England (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y.)______796 D.C. T ra^ aiw “ ^ “ Company, Zurich, Switzerland (U.S. Office, New York, N .Y .)______3,121 D.C. Timrrnn ™Reinsurance Company, New York, N .Y ...... 134 D.C. ZnHnh m l ilre and General Insurance Company, New York, N .Y______...______440 D.C. 1 msurance Company, Zurich, Switzerland (U.S. Office, Chicago, H l.)_ ...... 7,024 D.C. effective hmuMlyiaSi9 6 5 business of the Buckeye Union Casualty Company, changed effective January 1,1966 (see F ed era l R eg ister of January 20.1966. page 765 for details). rati™Imrprff?ri9«?tr*u^^urance Company and Central Surety and Insurance Oorpo- 6 Formerly Security Insurance Company of New Haven. Name changed effective 3 Thk S L ™ t0 company effective December 31,1965. January 1,1965. waukec assumed casualty (including fidelity and surety) business of M il- 6 Merchants Fire Assurance Company of New York and Merchants Indemnity 4 Formprh?^CT«e Company of Milwaukee, Wis., effective January 1, 1965. Corporation of New York merged into this company effective January 1, 1966. y Home Fire and Marine Insurance Company of California. Name N o tes (b) ol authority expire May 31, and are renewable June 1, annually, (c) The term ‘‘other areas” includes »Canal Zone, Guam, Puerto Rico and Virgin panies mav n°t limit the penal sum of bonds which surety corn- Islands. limitation anti' ■, 6 net retention, however, cannot exceed the underwriting (d) Abbreviated capital letters preceding judical districts indicate State In which methods in risks must be protected by reinsurance, co-insurance, or other the company is incorporated. Process agents are required in the following districts: lavorfavor of thp ITnitoToi i Treasurya reusury regulations.reguiai When excess risks on bonds in Where principal resides; where obligation is to be performed; and where bond is re- effected bv no» ate® S 0' Protected by reinsurance, such reinsurance is to be tamable or filed. No process agent required in State wherein company is incorpo bond or wifhm °4K^easu£? Lorm BA 6308 (formerly Form 369) to he filed with the rated. Letters “n, s, e, m, and w” preceding names of States indicate respectively reported for quMtprf8 a2 e? ^ r ' Risks In excess of limit fixed herein must be the Northern, Southern, Eastern, Middle, and Western judicial districts of States rating in fa»,,? which they are executed. In protecting such excess, the indicated. If letters do not precede names of States, process agents have been Emit applies m>Hi» *be execution of the risk will govern absolutely, This appointed in all judicial districts of such States. “ntu a “ow rating is established by the Treasury Department. [FJÌ. Doc. 66-3154; Filed, June 9,1966; 8:45 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8194 NOTICES following the date of such publication, both The Board, acting pursuant to sec CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD in accordance with the requirements of'sec tions 102, 204(a), and 412 of the Act, tion 408(b) of the Act. does not find the subject agreement to [Docket No. 17321] Pursuant to authority duly delegated by be adverse to the public interest or in the Board in the Board’s regulations (14 ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., AND CFR 385.13) , it is found that the above de- » violation of the Act, provided that ap CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD. scribed transaction should be approved under proval thereof is conditioned as here section 408(b) without a hearing. inafter ordered. Notice of Proposed Approval of Sale Accordingly, it is ordered: Accordingly, it is ordered: of Aircraft 1. That the transaction described in the That Agreement CAB 18703, R-16 instant application be and it hereby is ap through R-21, be approved, provided Application of Alaska Airlines, Inc., proved; and that approval thereof shall not consti for approval under section 408 of the 2. That this action does not constitute a tute approval of the specific commodity Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amend determination of the reasonableness of the transaction for rate-making purposes. descriptions contained therein for pur ed, of the sale to Cathay Pacific Airways, Persons entitled to petition the Board for poses of tariff publication. Ltd., of one Convair 880 aircraft, Docket review of this order pursuant to the Board’s Any air carrier party to the agreement, 17321. regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may file such peti or any interested person, may, within Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the tions within 5 days after the date of service 15 days from the date of service of this statutory requirements of section 408(b) of this order. order, submit statements in writing con of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as This order shall be effective and become taining reasons deemed appropriate, to amended, that the undersigned intends the action of the Civil Aeronautics Board gether with supporting data, in support to issue the order set forth below under upon expiration of the above period- unless within such period a petition for review of or in opposition to the Board’s action delegated authority. Interested persons thereof is filed, or the Board gives notice that herein. An original and 19 copies of the are hereby afforded a period of 15 days itr will review this order on its own motion. statements should be filed with the from the date of service within which to Board’s Docket Section. The Board may, file comments or request a hearing with By : J. W. Rosenthal, Director, upon consideration of any such state respect to the action proposed in the Bureau of Operating Rights. ments filed, modify or rescind its action order. herein by subsequent order. [seal] Harold R. S anderson, Dated at Washington, D.C., June 7, Secretary. This order will be published in the 1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-6389; Filed, June 9, 1966; F ederal R egister. J. W. R osenthal, Director, 8:48 a.m.] By the Civil Aeronautics Board. Bureau o f Operating Rights. [ seal] Harold R. S anderson, Order op Approval [Docket No. 16236; Order E-23773] Secretary. Issued under delegated authority. INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT [F.R. Doc. 66-6390; Filed, June 9, 1966; Application of Alaska Airlines, Inc., Docket ASSOCIATION 8:48 a.m.] 17321, for approval of contract of sale of aircraft, engines, and spares. Order Regarding Specific [Docket 17291] By application filed May 12, 1966, Alaska Commodity Rates Airlines, Inc. (Alaska) requests approval, TRANS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, without hearing, pursuant to section 408(b) Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics INC. of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as Board at its office in Washington, D.C., amended, (the Act) of the sale to Cathay on the 6th day of June 1966. Notice of Proposed Approval of Pacific Airways, Ltd. (Cathay) of one Convair Application 880M aircraft, three spare engines and Agreement adopted by Joint Confer Alaska’s inventory of other spare parts. The ence 1-2, 3-1, and 1-2-3 of the Interna Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the total sale price is SS^OO.OOO.1 tional Air Transport Association relating statutory requirements of section 408(b), In support of its request for approval, to specific commodity rates; Docket that the undersigned intends to issue the Alaska states that the aircraft will become 16236, Agreement CAB 18703, R-16 attached order under delegated author surplus to its requirements on delivery of the through R-21. ity. Interested persons are hereby first of two Boeing 727 aircraft which are An agreement has been filed with the scheduled for delivery in September and afforded a period of 15 days from date oi October 1966; that the 880 will be retained Board, pursuant to section 412(a) of the service within which to file comments or in service until the first 727 is delivered; Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the Act) request a hearing with respect to tne and that the transaction is fair, reasonable, and Part 261 of the Board’s Economic action proposed in the order. advantageous, and compensatory to Alaska. Regulations between various air carriers, Dated at Washington, D.C., June 7, No objections to approval of the applica foreign air carriers, and other carriers, tion have been filed. 1966. embodied in the resolutions of Joint J. W. R osenthal, Upon review of the application, we have Conferences 1—2, 3—1, and 1-2—3 of the concluded that the Convair 880 aircraft and Director, related equipment to be sold to Cathay, a International Air Transport Association Bureau o f Operating Rights. (LATA), and adopted pursuant to the person engaged in a phase of aeronautics, Order Approving Agreement constitute a substantial part of the proper provisions of resolution 590 dealing with ties of Alaska within the meaning of section specific commodity rates. Issued under delegated authority. 408 of the Act. However, it has been further The agreement, adopted pursuant to Application of Trans international Al concluded that the sale of these properties linea, Inc., for approval of an agreement unprotested notices to the carriers and der section 412 and for an exemption una to Cathay does not affect the control of an promulgated in IATA letters dated April air carrier directly engaged in the operation section 416(b) of the Federal Aviation of aircraft in air transportation, does not 27, and May 16, 1966,1 as set forth in the of 1958, as amended; Docket 17291, Agr result in creating a monopoly and does not attachment hereto,2 (1) names a rate ment CAB 18899. , Ajr_ tend to restrain competition. Furthermore, under a new commodity description, and On May 5, 1966, Trans International -w no person disclosing a substantial interest (2) names additional rates under exist lines, Inc. (TI A), filed with th e Board in the proceeding is currently requesting a ing commodity descriptions. The new agreement (CAB 18899) which it h « . - hearing. It therefore appears that approval tered into with Canadian Pacific Air, ation rates under the new and existing com Ltd. (CPAL), together with an applic of the transaction without a hearing would modity descriptions reflect reductions not be inconsistent with the public interest. for approval of this agreement and an exe v Notice of intent to dispose of the applica ranging from 18.7 to 86.5 percent and are tion from sections 401 and 403 of the Actto tion without a hearing has been published consistent with the present level of spe the extent necessary to carryout the op t in the F ederal R egister and a copy of such cific commodity rates within the appli tions described therein. The _agr ^ action has been furnished by the Board to cable areas. envisages the leasing by TIA to C dlng the Attorney General not later than the day period beginning October 2, 1966, and ending 1 Received, in the Board Apr. 29, and May October 1, 1967, of one DC-8-51 aircraft^ use in any CPAL service, with ' °ved 1 Comprised of $3,045,000 for the aircraft, 23,1966, respectively. 2 Attachment filed as part of original furnished by TIA but with the right re $510,000 for the three spare engines and by CPAL to use its own crews. $145,000 for other spare parts. document. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8195 In support of its application TIA alleges, mercial to military traffic. The only US. nation that the activities planned to be inter alia, that CPAL recently lost one of its point served by CPAL (other than service DC-8 aircraft in an accident and, because of between Whitehorse, Yukon, and Fairbanks, undertaken by its proposed subsidiaries, the long delivery date involved in obtaining Alaska, which does not appear pertinent here Farmers Agricultural Credit Co., Inc., a replacement which it has ordered, the in in view of the size of the aircraft) is Hono The Farmers Insurance Agency, Inc., stant arrangement is necessary; that TIA has lulu, Hawaii, on a route from Vancouver to American Insurance Agency, Inc., and an urgent need for additional utilization of Australasia. The only U.S. route carrier The International State Agency, are of its DC-8 fleet; that the first 8 months of the serving between Honolulu and any points the kind described in the aforementioned proposed lease are an off-season for commer on CPAL’s Vancouver-Australasia route is sections of the Act and the Regulation cial charter utilization; that TIA will receive Pan American World Airways, Inc., which is so as to make it unnecessary for the pro three 258-passenger DC-8-61 aircraft in a carrier of such size and strength compared March, April, and August, 1967 and thus, dur to CPAL that we see no likelihood of any hibitions of section 4 of the Act with ing the on-season of 1967, will be in a transi significant adverse effect upon it from the respect to shares in nonbanking organi tional stage wherein its total fleet capacity proposed utilization by CPAL of this one air zations to apply in order to carry out may temporarily outrun its traffic develop craft. Moreover, this aircraft is a replace the purposes of the Act. The name of ment; that TIA must also be concerned with ment rather than an addition to CPAL’s fleet the Carrington Credit Co., another pro the problem of maintaining the required bal and thus in a sense does not increase its posed subsidiary, was omitted from that ance between commercial and military reve competitive capacity. Finally, there is also notice. The hearing ordered to be held nues in accordance with the policies of the no reason to believe that the operation of by that notice has been held and evidence Military Air Command once it has obtained this service would impair the ability of TIA the three DC-&-61 aircraft; that CPAL will to promote and perform civil charters in received relating to the proposed activi pay TIA under this agreement the sum of accordance with its certificate. ties of the aforementioned proposed sub $4,115,000; and that the arrangement meets Pursuant to authority duly delegated by sidiaries, including Carrington Credit the guidelines of the Board’s policy state the Board in the Board’s Regulations, 14 CFR Co. ment respecting wet leases by U.S. carriers 385.13, it is found that the foregoing trans Any person desiring to give testi to foreign air carriers (section 399.19). action should be approved under section 408 mony in this proceeding concerning the No objections to this application have been (b) of the Act, without a hearing. Carrington Credit Co. and its proposed received. Accordingly, it is ordered: A threshold jurisdictional question is 1. That the transaction between TIA and activities should file with the Secretary posed by the subject application. TIA ap CPAL hereinbefore described be and it hereby of the Board, directly or through the parently conceives of, the transaction as in is approved under section 408 of the Act; Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, volving a “wet lease,” that is a charter of 2. That this action shall not be deemed an Minneapolis, Minn., on or before June 28, aircraft and crews since it seeks operating approval for rate-making purposes of the 1966, a written request containing a authority normally associated with a "wet financial provisions of the transaction; statement of the petitioner’s interest in lease,” i.e., an exemption from sections 401 3. That to the extent not granted TIA’s and 403 of the Act. However, our analysis the proceeding, and a summary of the application be and it hereby is dismissed; and matters concerning which said petitioner of the lease convinces us that what is in 4. That this order may be amended or volved is the customary lease of aircraft and revoked at any time in the discretion of the wishes to give testimony. Such request not a charter of aircraft and crews. Conse Board without hearing. will be presented to the designated hear quently, approval under section 408 of the Persons entitled to petition the Board for ing examiner for his determination as to Act is required rather than the operating review of this order pursuant to the Board’s the need for a further hearing in this authority sought by TIA. Although TIA Regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may file such matter. Persons submitting requests crews may operate the aircraft, it is clear petitions within five days after the date of will be notified of the hearing examiner’s from the agreement that TIA will give up service of this order. decision. dominion and control of the aircraft during This order shall be effective and become the term of the lease. Thus, for example, the action of the Civil Aeronautics Board Dated at Washington, D.C., this 3d day CPAL shall operate the aircraft under its upon expiration of the above period unless of June 1966. certificate and Canadian operating authority; within such period a petition for review the aircraft will be registered in Canada; thereof is filed, or the Board gives notice that By order of the Board of Governors. anif ^PA4j maintain hull insurance and it will review this order on its own motion. liability coverage. These and other lease [seal] M erritt S herman, provisions, taken in the aggregate, are the By ; J. W. Rosenthal, Secretary. basis for our conclusion. In view of the Director, ffiregoing the subject application shall be Bureau of Operating Rights. [F.R. Doc. 66-6372; Filed, June 9, 1966; reared as seeking relief under section 408 8:46 a.m.] of the Act. [seal] Harold R. Sanderson, Notice of intent to dispose of the applica- Secretary. in+v,W™h0ut a hearing haa been published [F.R. Doc. 66-6404; Filed, June 9, 1966; in tne Federal Register, and a copy of such 8:48 a.m.] FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS has been furnished by the Board to attorney General not later than the day owing the date of such publication, both COMMISSION R^f CCOT5ance w*th the requirements of [Canadian Change List 211] section 408 of the Act. consideration of the application, it FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM CANADIAN BROADCAST STATIONS 40ft ovi ! ded t h a t jurisdiction under section OTTO BREMER CO. List of Changes, Proposed Changes, will i l l Smce CPAL’ a Phase of aeronautics, of tta SC a substantial portion of the assets Amended Notice of Request for De and Corrections in Assignments further an a\r carrier. However, it has been affect concluded that such lease does not termination and Order for Hear May 18, 1966. eneaLn ® C°^tr°1 of an air carrier directly ing Thereon Notification under the provisions of transnortllthe °Peration of aircraft in air part III, section 2 of the North American mononllt10? ’/ ° es not result in creating a Notice was given by publication in 30 Regional Broadcasting Agreement. or 1eonarrtiand does not restrain competition F.R. 16286 (Dec. 30, 1965) that request List of changes, proposed changes and to S S S S ? a? other aIr carrier not a party had been made to the Board of Gover d isc lo s in g !!0?' Purtbermore, no person corrections in assignments of Canadian nors of the Federal Reserve System, pur Broadcast Stations modifying appendix requestw substantial interest is currently suant to section 4(c)(6) of the Bank Pub!c £ i l l e! lng and 4t is f°und that the containing assignments of Canadian The lea «¡a does not require a hearing, Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. Broadcast Stations (Mimeograph No. aircraft utilw T asslst TIA with respect to 1843(c)(6)) and § 222.5(b) of the 47214-3) attached to the recommenda recewL th!ti,l0n ?nd’ subsequent to its Board’s Regulation Y (12 CFR 222.5(b)), tions of the North American Regional with reso ld ? ' stretched” jet aircraft, by the Otto Bremer Co., St. Paul, Minn., P o maintaining its ratio of com Broadcasting Agreement Engineering a bank holding company, for a determi Meeting. No. 112- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8196 NOTICES 4. Each of the applicants is qualified to Sched Expected date of construct and operate as proposed. How Location Power kw Antenna ule Class commencement Call letters of operation ever, because of their mutual exclusivity the Commission is unable to make the statutory finding that a grant of the sub 690 kilocycles E.I.O. 6-15-67. ject applications would serve the public C K EY (PO: 690 kc DA-2 U in 10 kwD/5 kwN interest, convenience and necessity, and DA-1). 600 kilocycles is of the opinion that they must be desig E.I.O. 5-15-67. CJCH (PO: 600 kc North Bay, Ontario...... 10 kwD/5 kwN.. DA-2 u m , nated for hearing in a consolidated pro 10 kwD/5 kwN ceeding on the issues set forth below. DA-2). 6i0 kilocycles 5. It is ordered, That, pursuant to sec E.I.O. 5-15-67. New (change in pat Prince George, British 10 kw...... DA-N u h i tion 309(e) of the Communications Act tern and location Columbia. of 1934, as amended, the applications are with increase in power—See List designated for hearing in a consolidated No. 209). proceeding, at a time and place to be 6S0 kilocycles m C JET (now in oper Smith Falls, Ontario----- DA-2 U specified in a subsequent order, upon the ation with increas following issues: ed power). 710 kilocycles 1. To determine which of the proposals D E.I.O. 5-15-67. CJSP (change in Leamington, Ontario. - . DA-D ii would better serve the public interest. pattern and loca 2. To determine, in the light of the tion with increase in power—See List evidence adduced pursuant to the fore No. 177) (PO: 710 going issue, which of the applications for kc 1 kw DA-D). 7SO kilocycles construction permit should be granted. Night h E.I.O. 5-15-67. New______Leamington, Ontario.. . DA-N 6. It is further ordered, That, to avail 900 kilocycles themselves of the opportunity to be U n CKTS (delete as Sherbrooke, Province of 10 kwD/2.5 DA-2 heard, the applicants pursuant to § 1.221 signment). Quebec. kwN. (c) of the Commission’s rules, in person 900 kilocycles or by attorney, shall, within 20 days of n E.I.O. 5-15-67. CKTS (PO: 900 kc Sherbrooke, Province of DA-1 u the mailing of this order, file with the 1 kw DA-N). Quebec. ItSO kilocycles Commission in triplicate, a written ap IV New (delete assign Powell River, British DA-2 u pearance stating an intention to appear ment—vide; 1280 Columbia. on the date fixed for the hearing and kc). 1980 kilocycles present evidence on the issues specified in u in E.I.O. 5-15-67. New—______- Powell River, British DA-1 Columbia. this order. 1370 kilocycles 7. It is further ordered, That the ap DA-N u in E.I.O. 5-15-67. New______Saskatoon, Saskatche 10 kw ...... plicants herein shall, pursuant to section wan. 1390 kilocycles 311(a) (2) of the Communications Act of u m E.I.O. 5-15-67. New____ 5 kwD/1 kwN__ DA-1 1934, as amended, and §1.594 of the Com UtO kilocycles mission’s rules, give notice of the hear CJVR (assignment Melfort, Saskatchewan.. DA-N u in ing, either individually or, if feasible and of call letters). H90 kilocycles consistent with the rules, jointly, within ND u IV E.I.O. 5-15-67. New—______- Shaunavon, Saskatche- 1 kwD/0.25 the time and in the manner prescribed in wan. kwN. such rule, and shall advise the Commis sion of the publication of such notice as F ederal Communications Commission, required by § 1.594(g) of the rules. [SEAL] B en F . W aple, Secretary. Released: June 7,1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-6385; Filed, Juné 9,1966; 8:47 a.m.] F ederal Communications Commission,1 [seal] B en F . W aple, [Docket Nos. 16667,16668; FCC 66-4861 populations which would receive service Secretary. from the proposals. Consequently, for LUNDE CORP. AND KASI the purposes of comparison, the areas F.R. Doc. 66-6386; Filed, June 9, 1966; IOWA, INC. and populations within the 1 mv/m con 8:47 a.m.] tours together with the availability of Order Designating Applications for other FM services of at least 1 mv/m in Docket Nos. 16669, 16670; FCC 66-487] Consolidated Hearing on Stated such areas will be considered under the MSTEAD COUNTY BROADCASTING Issues standard comparative issue for the pur pose of determining whether a compara COMPANY AND NORTH CENTRAL In re applications of Lunde Corp., tive preference should accrue to either VIDEO, INC. Ames, Iowa, Docket No. 16667, File No. of the applicants. der Designating Applications for BPH-5016, requests 104.1 me, No. 281; 3. As we stated in the Reising case, 100 kw; 451 feet; KASI Iowa, Inc., Ames, 1 FCC 2d 1082, 6 R R 2d 431 (1965), pro Consolidatedv Hearing on Stated Iowa, Docket No. 16668, File No. BPH - graming evidence would not be admis Issues 5118, requests 104.1 me, No. 281; 52.9 kw; sible under the standard comparative 269 feet; for construction permits. !n re applications of Olmstead County issue, absent a finding regarding a sub >adcasting Co., Rochester, Mi At a session of the Federal Communi stantial and material difference between cket No. 16669, File No. BPH-5145, re cations Commission held at its offices in the proposals. In this case, consideration 5sts 96.7 me, No. 244, 3 kw, 26 feet, Washington, D.C., on the 2d day of June of the programing proposals is required rth Central Video, Inc., Rocheste, 1966; nn„ Docket No. 16670, Pile No* BFH- 1. The Commission has under consid because KASI Iowa, Inc., proposes to du plicate its companion AM station ap )2, requests 96.7 me, No. 244, 3 kw, eration the above captioned and de :t; for construction permits. . . . scribed applications which are mutually proximately 12 hours per day or 70.38 It a session of the Federal Communi exclusive in that operation by the ap percent of the ■ time, while Lunde Corp. ns Commission held at its o®®6® e plicants as proposed would result in proposes independent operation. There ishington, D.C., on the 2d day of mutually destructive interference. fore, programing evidence will be admis 2. Data submitted by the applicants sible under the standard comparative indicate that there would be a significant ■ Commissioner Lee absent. difference in the size of the areas and issue. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 1T2— -FRIDAY, JUNE TO, 1966 NOTICES 8197 1. The Commission has before it for notice as required by § 1.594(g) of the when you dine at one of the downtown Blue consideration the above captioned and rules. Boar locations between 4:30 and 8:30 any described applications which are mutu night of the week you can play “Napkin ally exclusive in that operation by the Released: J une 7, 1966. Roulette” ! Here’s all you do: Just unroll applicants as proposed would cause your dinner napkin * * * and tucked in F ederal Communications side, along with the silver * * * you may mutually destructive interference. Commission,1 j find two free tickets to see an outstanding 2. As we stated in the Reising case, 1 [seal] B en F . W aple, j I first run movie at one of the six downtown FCC 2d 1082, 6 R R 2d 431 (1965) pro Secretary. theaters. So, when you want a really en graming evidence would not be admis [F.R. Doc. 66-6387; Filed, June 9, 1966; joyable evening on-the-town, come down sible under the standard comparative 8:47 a.fn.J town td Blue Boar * * * where the fun is. issue, absent a finding regarding a mate rial and substantial difference between Reising attaches affidavits to his petition the proposals. In this case, considera [Docket Nos. 16253,16423; FCC 66R-212] and reply which state that he purchased a meal at the Blue Boar Cafeteria but tion of the programing proposals is re KEITH L. REISING AND KENTUCK- quired because Olmstead County Broad did not find theater tickets in the napkin. casting Co. proposes to duplicate its com IANA TELEVISION, INC. Reising apparently made no attempt, panion AM station approximately 10 however, to play “napkin roulette” with Memorandum Opinion and Order out making a purchase. Kentuckiana, hours per day or 61.86 percent of the Enlarging Issues time, while North Central Video, Inc., with its opposition to Reising’s petition, proposes to duplicate the programing of In re applications of Keith L. Reising, submits the affidavits of five individuals its companion AM station only about 2 Louisville, Ky., Docket No. 16253, File unknown to the Blue Boar management’ hours and 40 minutes per day or 14.25 No. BPH-4207; Kentuckiana Television, who entered the cafeteria, unrolled percent of the time. Therefore, pro Inc., Louisville, Ky., Docket No. 16423, napkins but did not purchase food. graming evidence reasonably relating to File No. BPH-5120; for construction Only one affiant went to the cafeteria be the indicated AM duplication matter will permits. tween the hours of 4:30 and 8:30 p.m. be admissible under the standard com 1. The Review Board has before it for when, according to the advertisement, a parative issue. consideration the motion of Keith L. person could play “napkin roulette”. 3. Each of the applicants is qualified Reising (Reising) to add issues111 respect 3. A lottery possesses three elements: to construct and operate as proposed. ing the broadcasting of an advertise (1) Chance, (2) prize, and (3) considera However,: because of their mutual ex ment for a lottery by Kentuckiana Tele tion, FCC v. American Broadcasting Co., clusivity the Commission is unable to vision, Inc. (Kentuckiana), licensee of 347 U S. 284, 10 R R 2030 (1954). Ken make the statutory finding that a grant Station WLKY-TV, Louisville, Ky., and tuckiana contends that since in the of the subject applications would serve an applicant herein for a new FM broad “napkin roulette” promotion there was the public interest, convenience, and cast station at Louisville. Reising’s ap no requirement to purchase food the necessity, and is of the opinion that they plication, also for a new FM broadcast element of consideration was not pres must be designated for hearing in a con station at Louisville, Ky., was first desig ent, citing Caples Co. v. United States, solidated proceeding on the issues set nated for hearing by Memorandum 100 U.S. App. D.C. 126, 243 F. 2d 232, 15 forth below. Opinion and Order, FCC 65-949, 1 FCC RR 2065 (1957). Even though the pur 4. It is ordered, That, pursuant to sec 2d 1082. Kentuckiana’s application was chase of food might be called “minimal” tion 309(e) of the Communications Act consolidated for hearing with the appli consideration, such purchase would con of 1934, as amended, the applications cations of Reising and another proposal stitute consideration and render the are designated for hearing in a consoli since dismissed (FCC 66M-318, released contest in question a lottery. As the dated proceeding, at a time and place to March 3, 1966), by Order FCC 66-38, Commission stated in The Noble Broad be specified in a subsequent order, upon released January 17, 1966. casting Co., 1 FCC 2d 154, 5 RR 2d 915 the following issues: 2. Reising requests that issues be (1965): 1. To determine which of the pro added to determine whether Kentuckiana Consideration exists where a chance or a posals would better serve the public broadcast an advertisement for a lottery prize drawing is given with the purchase of interest. sponsored by the Blue Boar Cafeteria in legitimate goods, even though the goods are ,2- To determine, in the light of th Louisville, Ky. The advertising copy, in fact priced no higher because of the is attached to Kentuckiana’s opposition suance of the prize or chances. Homer v - evidence adduced pursuant to the fore United States, 147 U.S. 449 (1893) .2 going issue, which of the application pleading, reads as follows: J " construction permit should b Downtown LouisviUe * * * that’s where 4. The Broadcast Bureau points out granted. the fun is! and that’s where Blue Boar is that the determination of whether the too * * * with two convenient locations: “napkin roulette” promotion was a further ordered, That, to avai on Fourth Street in the heart of the theater hM?f fuS of t.he opportunity to b district and * * * on Walnut Street be lottery must be made in light of all of, to s i ’00,h.esapplicants herein pursuan tween Fourth and Fifth. You’ll enjoy Blue the surrounding conditions. The Re Dprlmf21(Cu of the Commission rules, ii Boar’s relaxing atmosphere * * * cheerful view Board agrees with this observation. davs^f by att°™ey. shall, within 2i service * * * and vast variety of delicious The fact that the theatre tickets were thI s ° f the mailing of this order, file witl homemade food at pleasing prices, and wrapped in dinner napkins at the end annpa^1881!01? in triplicate, a writtei of the food line and the improbability Pear S^at.ing an intention to ap 1 Commissioner Lee absent. that a person would enter a food line and nrpcfhf da^e t°r the hearinj The Review Board has the following without purchasing food are considera pleadings before ’it for consideration: (1) ifwinthtooerdernCe °n iSSUes spec Petition to enlarge issues, filed by Keith L. tions to be weighed in judging whether order«i, That the ap> Reising on Mar. 1, 1966; (2) opposition to petition to enlarge issues, filed by Kentucki 2 Applying the dicta of the Horner case, 311(a) io\Pursuant to sectioi ana Television, Inc., on Mar. 18, 1966; (3) the Court held in U.S. v. Walls 58 Fed. 942 1934 as nm Communications Act o: Broadcast Bureau’s comments on “petition (1893) that the purchase of a newspaper C o i^ s io Ìl d^d’ and § 1-594 of tin to enlarge issues”, filed on Mar. 18, 1966; and containing a number similar to numbers to heaS1S?hft .glve notice of th< (4) reply to responses to petition to enlarge be drawn constituted a violation of the issues, filed by Keith L. Reising on Apr. 5, postal lottery laws. Cf. WRBC Radio Sta We S ’co n iT ^ iS S u aU y or, if feasi- 1966. Inasmuch as the facts underlying within the tiS t^ the rules> jointly tions, Inc. (WRBC), 2 FCC 687 (1936), Reising’s request are alleged to have occurred Metropolitan Broadcasting Corp. (WMBQ), 5 scribed in e.*^6 and ln the manner pre- in February and March 1966, good cause for S5SfiSff% ^ e- and shall advise th< FCC 501 (1938) and Meredith Colon ^mission of the publication of suet late filing of Reising’s petition is determined Johnston, 1 FCC 2d 720, 5 RR 2d 749 (Rev to exist. Bd. 1965). FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, T966 8198 NOTICES broadcast to insure that it was a proper on a finding of inadequate policing of the the promotion was a lottery.* In a re obligations under it * * *. cent Memorandum Opinion and Order, promotion. A failure in this respect on KTOK Radio, Inc., FCC 66-431, released the part of Kentuckiana may have con General Order 7 (46 CFR Part 528) May 12, 1966 (imposing a forfeiture for stituted a violation of its responsibility was adopted to implement section 15, as broadcast of a lottery advertisement), to supervise and control the material amended by Public Law 87-346, 75 Stat. the Commission, answering a contention broadcast over its station. See Palmetto 763-4, effective October 3, 1961. The that at least 90 persons participated Broadcasting Co., 33 FCC 251, 23 RR order provides in pertinent part, as without making a purchase, stated: 483; reconsideration denied 34 FCC 101, follows: The advertisement for this contest states 23 R R 486a (1963); affirmed 334 F. 2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964), 2 R R 2d 2001; cert, § 528.1 Scope and purpose. * * * The that a purchase is necessary to participate Commission shall disapprove an agreement and contains nothing to indicate that one denied 379 U.S. 843. An issue will be thereunder if, after notice, and hearing, it can enter without making such a purchase. added on the Board’s own motion to finds inadequate policing of the obligations Further, the licensee admits that efforts determine whether Kentuckiana vio of the agreement. This amendment makes were made to have all registrants purchase lated its responsibility of supervision and it necessary that provision for self-policing merchandise, and the registration form even control. be included in certain section 15 agreements states that a purchase is necessary. No an Accordingly, it is ordered, This 6th day and that the Commission be informed of the nouncement or printed statement directed manner in which such provision is being to the public indicated how one might par of June 1966, that the Petition to En carried out. The requirements set forth ticipate without making a purchase. The large Issues, filed by Keith L. Reising on below are to aid the Commission in deter fact that some few persons allegedly may March 1, 1966, is granted to the extent mining the existence and adequacy of self- have been allowed to register without making indicated herein, and the issues in this policing systems, in accordance with the a purchase does not alter the advertiser’s proceeding are enlarged by the addition statutory objective. intent and purpose for conducting the of the following issues; § 528.2 General requirements, section 15 contest. (1) To determine the facts and cir agreements. Conference agreements and 5. Kentuckiana urges that “the broad cumstances surrounding the advertise other rateflxing agreements between common cast of a single promotional scheme does ment by television broadcast Station carriers by water in the foreign and domestic off-shore commerce of the United States, not'raise a question upon which an evi WLKY-TV, Louisville, Ky., during the whether or not previously approved, shall dentiary hearing must be held,” citing month of February 1966, of a promotion contain a provision describing the method as authority Audiocasting of Texas, Inc., entitled “Napkin Roulette”; or system used by the parties in policing the FCC 64-1044, 3 RR 2d 1035. The Audio (2) To determine whether Kentucki obligations under the agreement, including casting case involved approval of an ana exercised appropriate control or the procedure for handling complaints and application for transfer of control in supervision of its programing by insur the functions and authority of every person which a petition to deny was interposed ing prior to broadcast that its promotion having responsibility for administering the system. In the case of agreements, previ alleging, among other things, that spot of “Napkin Roulette” did not constitute ously approved under section 15 which do announcements on November 9, 1963, the broadcast of an advertisement for a not meet these requirements, the parties had advertised a teenage dance where lottery; shall file for approval an amendment which records and silver dollars were given (3) To determine, in light of the evi complies with the requirements * * *... away. In concluding that it was unnec dence adduced pursuant to the foregoing § 528.3 Reporting requirements. Twice essary to decide whether this promotion issues, whether the comparative qualifi each year, once during the month of Janu constituted a lottery, the Commission cations of Kentuckiana Television, Inc., ary and once during the month of July, there stated “ ttlhis single incident involving are adversely affected. shall be filed with the Commission by the a marginal question at best is not of a conferences and carriers subject to these Released: June 7,1966. rules, or by any person to whom they have nature which would raise a public inter delegated the self-policing authority, a report est question or constitute a ground for F ederal Communications Commission,4 showing the nature of each complaint re denying the subject application.” Sim ceived during the preceding 6-month period; [seal] B en F . W aple, ilarly, the Noble case, supra, held that the action taken on the complaint or on the promotion of two dances with prizes Secretary. the volition of any person responsible for to ticket purchasers, while constituting [F.R. Doc. 66-6388; Filed, June 9, 1966; policing; and with respect to violations a lottery, was not sufficient to disqualify 8:47 a.m.j found, the nature thereof and the penalty or other sanction imposed. The names of an applicant in a renewal proceeding. the parties involved in complaints or in 6. On the basis of the pleadings, a action taken on the volition of the person sufficient showing has been made to raise FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION responsible for policing may be omitted from the question as to whether a lottery was these reports. involved, m view of the termination of [Docket No. 66-36] promotion, and of the fact that the OUTWARD CONTINENTAL NORTH The basic agreement, as approved by the U.S. Shipping Board on June 14,1927, promotion apparently was no more than PACIFIC FREIGHT CONFERENCE an isolated instance, the matter does not does not contain a self-policing provision appear to raise a question as to the li Admission, Withdrawal, and Expul which conforms to the requirements out censee’s basic qualifications but is rele sion; Self-Policing Reports; Ship lined in § 528.2 above. vant to the comparative evaluation of the pers’ Requests and Complaints; On November 24, 1964, a form letter (Attachment l ) 1 was addressed to au two applicants. Even if it is concluded Order To Show Cause that “napkin roulette” was not legally a those Conferences and ratefixing agree lottery, a question is presented by reason Agreement 93, originally approved ments, including the subject Conference, of the language used in the advertise June 14, 1927, between the member lines which had not filed self-policing reports ment of the promotion whether Ken- of the Outward Continental North Pa due in July 1964, covering the penoa tuckiana took adequate steps prior to its cific Freight Conference, covers the trade from January through June 1964, Pu ‘ from Scandinavian, Baltic, German, suant to the requirements of § 52tW Dutch, Belgian, and French Atlantic General Order 7. No report was filed 3 See Central States Theatre Corp. v. Pat, 11 F. Supp. 566 (S.D. la. 1936) concerning ports to all Pacific Coast ports north of response to our letter. the interpretation of the NBA fair business the United States-Mexican border, and By letter of February 16,1965 (Attach standards code respecting the operation of a to the Hawaiian Islands with transship ment 2 ) ,1 the attention of the movie theatre alleged to be engaging in un ment at Los Angeles Harbor and/or San was called to the first unfiled report fair business tactics because it promoted Francisco. in July 1964, and to the second urmieu an alleged lottery. A lottery was held to Section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, report due in January 1965. Again exist because the persons wishing to engage reads in pertinent part, as follows: reports w in the promotion had to sign their names letter was ignored and no on an entry book placed in the foyer of the The Commission shall disapprove any filed. theatre. The Court concluded that, ‘'[t]he such agreement, after notice and hearing, very purpose of the registration book being .* Attachments 1,2,3, 4, 5, and 6 filed as par within the foyer of the theatre is to Induce 4 Board Members Berkemeyer and Slone people to enter the theatre * * dissenting. of original document. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8199 On April 29,1965, a letter (Attachment Maritime Commission and no admission shall Section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, 3)1 was addressed to the subject Con be effective prior to the postmark date of also provides, in pertinent part, that: ference in which modification of the such notice. agreement was requested to conform with (e) Advice of any denial of admission to The Commission shall disapprove any such membership, together with a statement of agreement, after notice and hearing, on a the requirements of General Order 7. the reasons therefor, shall be furnished finding * * * of failure or refusal to adopt No reply has been received to this letter promptly to the Federal Maritime Commis and maintain reasonable procedures for and no action has been taken on this sion. promptly and fairly hearing and considering matter by the Conference. (f) Any party may withdraw from the shippers’ requests and complaints. Section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, Conference without penalty by giving at provides, in pertinent part, as follows: least 30 days’ written notice of intention to General Order 14 was adopted to im withdraw to the conference: Provided, how plement section 2 of Public Law 87-346, No such agreement shall be approved, nor ever, That action taken by the conference to effective October 3, 1961. The general shall continued approval be permitted * * * compel the payment of outstanding financial order as promulgated, provided, in perti in respect to any conference agreement, obligations by the resigning member shall nent part as follows: which fails to provide reasonable and equal not be construed as a penalty for withdrawal. terms and conditions for admission and re (g) Notice of withdrawal of any party shall § 527.3 Filing of procedures. Within 60 admission to conference membership of other be furnished promptly to the Federal Mari days from the effective date of this part, each qualified carriers in the trade, or fails to time Commission. ratemaking group operating under an ap provide that any member may withdraw from (h) No party may be expelled against its proved section 15 agreement shall file with membership upon reasonable notice without will from this Conference except for failure the Commission a statement outlining in penalty for such withdrawal. to maintain a common carrier service be complete detail its procedures for the dis tween the ports within the scope of t.hig position of shippers’ requests and complaints. General Order 9 was adopted to imple agreement (said failure to be determined In January of each year thereafter, each of ment section 2 of Public Law 87-346, according to the minimum sailing require the above shall file a report covering all effective October 3, 1961. It provides as ments set forth in this agreement) or for changes made in »these procedures during the follows: failure to abide by all the terms and condi past year, and, in the event the procedures tions of this agreement. have continued unchanged, the report shall § 523.1 Statement of policy, (a) * * * (i) No expulsion shall become effective so state.2 no conference agreement shall be approved, until a detailed statement setting forth the § 527.4 Reports. By January 31, April 30, nor shall continued approval be permitted for reason or reasons therefor has been furnished July 31, and October 31 of each year, each any agreement, which fails to provide reason the expelled member and a copy of such conference and each other body with rate able and equal terms and conditions for ad notification submitted to the Federal Mari fixing authority under an approved agree mission and readmission to conference mem time Commission. ment shall file -with the Commission a report bership of other qualified carriers in the covering all shippers’ requests and com trade, or fails to provide that any member On November 5, 1964, the Commission plaints received during the preceding calen may withdraw from membership upon dispatched a letter to the Conference dar quarter or pending at the beginning of reasonable notice without penalty for such Secretary (Attachment 4) ,* advising the such calendar quarter. The first such report withdrawal. shall be filed by October 31, 1965. All such Conference of the requirement of § 523.10 reports shall Include the following informa (b) It is the responsibility of the Federal of General Order 9 that all existing Con Maritime Commission under the Shipping tion for each request or complaint: Act, 1916, to determine that all conference ference agreements be modified to com (a) Date request or complaint was re agreements contain reasonable and equal ply with General Order 9 and filed with ceived. terms and conditions for admission and re the Commission by July 20, 1964. In his (b) Identity of the person or firm sub admission to conference membership of response thereto, dated December 16, mitting the request or complaint. qualified carriers according to the require 1964 (Attachment 5),1 the Conference (c) Nature of request or complaint, i.e., ments set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. Secretary stated that the terms of the rate reduction, rate establishment, classifi Commission’s General Order had been cation, overcharge, undercharge, measure § 523.2 Provisions of conference agree ment, etc. ments. in effectuation of the policy set compared with the terms of the agree forth in § 523.1, conference agreements, ment, and that no ^substantial difference (d) If final action was taken, date and whether in effect on October 3, 1961, or initi between the two with respect to admis nature thereof. ated after that date, shall contain provisions sion, withdrawal and expulsion of Con (e) If final action was not taken, an iden substantially as follows: ference members could be found. tification of the request or complaint as (a) Any common carrier by water which The Conference Secretary was advised “pending”. as been regularly engaged as a common car- by letter of April 29, 1965 (Attachment (f) If denied, the reason. er in the trade covered by this agreement, § 527.5 Resident representative. Confer or who furnishes evidence of ability and in 3 ) of the specific changes required in ences and other ratemaking groups domi tuit.1011 Jf1 good faith to institute and main- Articles 2 and 3 of Agreement 93, as ciled outside the United States shall desig n such a common carrier service between amended, to effect compliance with Gen nate a resident representative in the United ports within the scope of this agreement, eral. Order 9. No response has been States with whom shippers situated in the in on^°r evidences an ability and intention received to this letter, and no action has United States may lodge their requests and pomntf iai^b abide by all the terms and been taken in this matter by the Confer complaints. The resident representative ciitions of this agreement, may hereafter ence. shall maintain for a period of 2 years a com its \ Party to this agreement by affixing The approved agreement of the mem plete record of requests and complaints filed us signature thereto. with him by shippers and consignees situated bers of the Outward Continental North in the United States and its territories. clurto^+L1116 above provision will not pre Pacific Freight Conference does not com mate r™,ii^nference from tmP°sing legiti- Conferences and other ratemaking groups but r ™d tions ,on membership, including port with the statutory requirements of subject to this section may satisfy the re of an nrtJ!?e^Sarily limited to, the payment section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, porting requirements of § 527.4 by reporting standin^if510^ fee’ Payment of any out- and the requirements of General Order those requests and complaints filed with the prior irfpmhan^ al obligations arising from 9 in the following respects: resident agent appointed pursuant to the w K f S S * or the P°stine of a «>- (a) “Just and reasonable cause” is pot provisions of this section. Appointment of must be deP°s*t. All such conditions the resident representative shall be made by ierence a ^ f 6 exPressed terms of the con- adequate criteria for denial of admission September 9, 1965. to membership and does not meet the § 527.6 Tariff provision. Tariff issued by by the CoSmf16^ ’ flled with and aPProved requirements of General Order 9 (§ 523.2 *° s“ “ on 15 of or on behalf of conferences and other rate (O). making groups shall contain full instructions (b) There is no provision for expulsion as to where and by what method shippers for failure to abide by all the terms and may file their requests and complaints, to the conditicmfi^+T*110*1 bas coinplied with conditions of the agreement (§ 523.2(h) ). gether with a sample of the rate request form, (a) of if one is used, or, in lieu thereof, a statement (c) The agreement fails to provide readmissionuuussion to membership. be denied admission or as to what supporting information is con "that no expulsion shall become effective sidered necessary for processing the request bership*1^ ? ^ i f 1'!06 of admission to mem- until a detailed statement setting forth or complaint through conference channels. ___ P m be furnished to the Federal the reason or reasons therefor has been Appropriate tariff provisions shall be accom- furnished the expelled member and a oi origin^document.3’ 4’ 5’ and 6 med as part copy of such notification submitted to 2 The concluding sentence of this section the Commission (§ 523.2(D). was deleted effective May 21, 1966. FEDERAL REGISTER; VOL. 31, NO. M 2— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8200 NOTICES pllshed within 90 days from the effective date 15, 1966, with copy to Respondent Con Howard Terminal leases from the Port of these rules.* ference. of Oakland, Calif. Pursuant to the terms of the original lease, the Port of On June 9, 1965, all conferences and By the Commission. Oakland Board of Port Commissioners ratemaking agreements were mailed a [ se a l ] F ra n cis C. H ttrney, has consented to this sublease to Learner. copy of General Order 14 which became Special Assistant The property is to be used solely for the effective July 9, 1965. This Conference to the Secretary. scrapping of vessels and the preparation has made no effort to comply with the At t a c h m e n t 7 and storage of scrap therefrom. Rental requirements of General Order 14. No Outward Continental North Pacific Freight is a fixed amount per square foot per response was received to our letter of month. January 7, 1966 (Attachment 6) ,* advis Conference, Karel Doormanlaan 8, Katwijk Aan Zee, Holland. Dated June 7,1966. ing the Conference Secretary of the Compagnie General Transatlantique (French failure of the Conference to so comply. Line), General Steamship Corp., Ltd., One By order of the Federal Maritime The issues raised herein do not involve Bush Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Commission. any disputed issues of fact which neces East Asiatic Co., Inc. (The) (A/S Det Ostasi- T homas L isi, sitate an evidentiary hearing and re atiske Kompagni), 465 California Street, Secretary. quire a prompt determination by the San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Hamburg Amerika Linie, Balfour, Guthrie & [F.R. Doc. 66-6400; Filed, June 9, 1966; Commission. Co., Ltd., 255 California Street, San Fran 8:48 a.m.] Now, therefore, pursuant to sections 15 cisco, Calif., 94111. and 22 of the Shipping Act, 1916: Nippon Yusen Kaisha, Ltd. (N.Y.K. Line), OCEANIC FORWARDING CO,, ET AL. It is ordered, That the Outward Con Transmarine Navigation Corp., 311 Califor tinental North Pacific Freight Confer nia Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94104. Notice of Agreements Filed for ence and the member lines thereof show Norddeutscher Lloyd, Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Approval cause why Agreement 93, as amended, Ltd., 255 California Street, San Francisco, should not be disapproved by the Com Calif., 94111. Notice is hereby given that the follow N. V. Nederlandsch-Amerikaansche Stoom- ing freight forwarder cooperative work mission pursuant to section 15 of the vaart - Maatschappij (Holland - Amerika Shipping Act, 1916, because of the Con ing agreements have been filed with the Lijn), 324 Samsome Street, San Francisco, Commission for approval pursuant to ference’s failure to comply with the re Calif., 94104. quirements of section 15 of the Shipping Olsen & Co., Fred (Fred Olsen Line), 465 section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as Act, 1916, and the Conference’s failure California Street, San Francisco, Calif., amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 to comply with the Commission’s General 94104. U.S.C. 814). Order 7, issued July 30, 1963, the Com Rederiaktiebolaget Nordstjeman (Johnson Interested parties may Inspect and mission’s General Order 9, issued April Line), 2 Pine Street, San Francisco, Calif., obtain a copy of the agreements at the 94111. Washington Office of the Federal Mari 21, 1964, and the Commission’s General Royal Mail Lines, Ltd., Holland-America Line, Order 14, issued June 8,1965. This pro time Commission, 1321 H Street NW., 324 Sansome Street, San Francisco, Calif., Room 609. Comments with reference to ceeding shall be limited to the submission 94104. of affidavits and memoranda and oral Westfal-Larsen & Co., A/S, 310 Sansome an agreement including a request for argument. The affidavits of fact and Street* San Francisco, Calif., 94104. hearing, if desired, may be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Com memoranda of law shall be filed by re ASSOCIATE MEMBER spondents no later than close of business mission, Washington, D.C., 20573, within American President Lines, Ltd., 601 Califor 20 days after publication of this notice July 8,1966, replies thereto shall be filed nia Street, San Francisco, Calif., 94108. by Hearing Counsel and interveners, if in the F ederal R egister. A copy of any [F.R. Doc. 60-6363; Filed, June 9, 1966; such statement or request for a hearing any, no later than close of business July 8:45 a.m.] 25, 1966. An original and 15 copies of should also be forwarded to each of the parties to the agreement (as indicated affidavits of fact, memoranda of law, and HOWARD TERMINAL AND hereinafter), and the comments should replies to be filed with the Secretary, LEARNER CO. indicate that this has been done. Federal Maritime Commission, Wash Unless otherwise indicated, these Notice of Agreements Filed for ington, D.C., 20573. Copies of any agreements are nonexclusive, coopera- Approval papers filed with the Secretary should tive working arrangements under which also be served upon all parties hereto. Notice is hereby given that the follow the parties may perform freight for warding services for each other. For Oral argument will be heard at a date ing Agreements have been filed with the Commission for approval pursuant to warding and service fees are to be agreed and time to be announced. section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as upon on each transaction. _ Ocean It is further ordered, That the Out amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 freight compensation is to be divided as ward Continental North Pacific Freight UJS.C. 814). agreed between the parties. Conference and its member lines as in Interested parties may inspect and ob Oceanic Forwarding Co., San Fran tain a copy of the agreement(s) at the cisco, Calif., and Fillette, Green dicated in Attachment 7, are hereby & Co. of Tampa, Tampa, Fla----- made respondents in this proceeding. Washington Office of the Federal Mari time Commission, 1321 H Street NW., L. B. Watson Co., Loe Angeles, Calif., It is further ordered, That this order Room 609; or may inspect agreements and J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc., New be published in the F ederal R egister and York, N.Y—!—------** at the offices of the District Managers, Karr, Ellis & Co., New York, N.Y., a copy of such order be served upon each New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and and Terra-Marine Shipping Co., respondent. San Francisco, Calif. Comments with San Francisco, Calif------F ^ 3030 Persons other than respondents and reference to an agreement including a M. E. Dey & Co., Milwaukee, Wis., and Pitt & Scott Corp., New j Hearing Counsel who desire to become a request for hearing, if desired, may be submitted to the Secretary, Federal York, N.Y------r party to this proceeding shall file a peti Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., Silvey Shipping Co., Inc., New Yore, tion for leave to intervene in accordance N.Y., and Valencia-Baxt Express _ 2 20573, within 20 days after publication Co., Inc., San Juan, P.R—------r with Rule 5(1) (46 CFR 502.72) of the of this notice in the F ederal R egister. A Arthur J. Fritz & Co., San F r a n c is c o , Commission’s rules of practice and proce copy of any such statement should also Calif., and Reedy Forwarding Co., 3034 dure no later than close of business June be forwarded to the party filing the Inc., Miami, Fla------agreement (as indicated hereinafter), Oceanic Forwarding Co., San Fran and the comments should indicate that cisco, Calif., and C. S. Greene « _go3g * Effective May 21, 1966, the following sen Co., Inc., Chicago, HI------tence was added to this section: “All changes this has been done. Agreement No. F F - 3 0 2 5 between E* made in such instructions shall be published Notice of agreement filed for approval in said tariffs, supplements thereto, or re by: port Enterprises, Inc., Phfia., Pa - . issues thereof, in accordance with the tariff Harmon K. Howard, 95 Market Street, Oak M. E. Dey & Co., Inc., Mfiwaukee, " filing requirements of sec. 18(b) of the Ship land, Calif., 94604. is a cooperative working arrangeni ping Act, 1916.” Agreement 8305-A is a sublease to the whereunder ocean freight pomp 1 Attachments 1,2,3, 4, 5, and 6 filed as part is to be retained by the originating tor of original document. Learner Co. of certain property which FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 3T, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8201 warder. The basic fee for passing ship time Commission, 1321 H Street NW., an investigation be, and it is hereby in per’s export declaration will be $2.50 Room 609; or may inspect agreement at stituted to determine the lawfulness of each. Other forwarding and service fees the offices of the District Managers, New all matter prefixed with a diamond sym are subject to negotiation and agreement York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and San bol in Supplement No. 3 to Kimbrell- on each transaction depending upon the Francisco, Calif. Comments with, ref Lawrence Transportation Co., Inc., Tariff services rendered or to be performed. erence to an agreement including a re FM C-F No. 1. The Commission will Agreement No. FF-3026 between quest for hearing, if desired, may be sub make such findings and issue such orders Thomas E. Flynn & Co., Miami, Fia., and mitted to the Secretary, Federal Mari as the facts and law warrant. Anderson Shipping Co., Savannah, Ga., time Commission, Washington, D.C., It is further ordered. That all subse is a cooperative Working arrangement 20573, within 20 days after publication quent revisions of the matter hereby whereunder forwarding and service fees of this notice in the F ederal R egister. placed under investigation shall be, and are $5.00 per shipment.1 Ocean freight A copy of any such statement should they are hereby placed under investiga compensation is 50 percent of brokerage. also be forwarded to the party filing the tion in this proceeding; This division of brokerage will be re agreement (as indicated hereinafter) It is further ordered, That (I) the in stricted to those shipments handled on and the comments should indicate that vestigation herein ordered be assigned behalf of each other. this has been done. for public hearing by the Chief Exami Agreement No. FF-3027 between Ad Notice of agreement filed for approval ner, before an examiner of the Commis vance Shipping Co., Houston, Tex., and by: sion’s Office of Hearing Examiners, at D. Hauser, Inc., New York, N.Y., is a Mr. Lim Eng Choon, Manager, Post Offioe Box a date and place to be announced; (II) cooperative working arrangement where 15294, Union House, Hong Kong. Kimbrell-Lawrence Transportation, Inc., under forwarding and service fees as-' be, and it is hereby made respondent in arranged. Ocean freight compensation Agreement 9553 between Asia Africa this proceeding; (IH) a copy of this is to be divided as arranged or 50-50. Shipping Co., Ltd., and Kawasaki Kisen order shall forthwith be served upon said Agreement No. FF-3033 between Mer Kaisha, Ltd., provides for the establish respondent; (IV) the said respondent be cury International Van Service, Inc., ment of a transshipment arrangement duly notified of the time and place of the Wilmington, Calif., and Universal Trans between the carriers for the movement hearing herein ordered; and (V) this or port Corp., New York, N.Y., is a coopera of general cargo In the trade from load der and notice of the said hearing be tive working arrangement whereunder ing ports in Indonesia to ports on the U.S. published in the F ederal R egister. forwarding and service fees are subject Atlantic and Gulf Coasts with transship to negotiation and agreement on each All persons (including individuals, cor ment at Hong Kong under terms and porations, associations, firms, partner transaction depending upon the services conditions as set forth in the agreement. to be performed. Ocean freight broker ships, and public bodies) having an in age shall be retained by the party ar Dated: June6,1966. terest in this proceeding and desiring to ranging the booking agreement with the intervene therein, should notify the Sec carrier. By order of the Federal Maritime Com retary of the Commission promptly and mission. file petitions for leave to intervene in Notice of Agreements S u bjec t to T homas L is i, accordance with Rule 5(1) (46 CFR Cancellation Secretary. 502.72). Notice is hereby given that the fol [F.R. D oc.,66-6362; Filed, June 9, 1966; By the Commission. lowing independent ocean freight for 8:45 a.m.] warder cooperative working agreements [ seal] T homas L is i, approved by the Commission pursuant Secretary. [Docket No. 66-37] to section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, [F.R. Doc. 66-6364; Filed, June 9, 1966; as amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 8:45 am .] U.S.C. 814) are scheduled for cancella KIMBRELL-LAWRENCE tion inasmuch as in accordance with the TRANSPORTATION, INC. terms therein the parties to the agree N.V. NEDLLOYD LIJNEN AND HOEGH ments have requested in writing that the General Increase in Rates In Kodiak agreements be terminated. Island, Alaska Peninsula, and LINES JOINT SERVICE ^ esler> New Orleans, La., and Aleutian Islands, Alaska; Notice of Notice of Agreement Filed for Export Enterprises, Inc., Philadel Investigation Approval phia, Pa___ PP—1498 Norton & Ellis, me., Norfolk, Va.", Whereas, on May 6, 1966, Kimbrell Notice is hereby given that the follow Export Enterprises, Inc., Lawrence Transportation, Inc., filed ing agreement has been filed with the Philadelphia, Pa______FF—1607 Supplement No. 3 to Tariff FMC-F No. 1 P1^ teAGreen & Co- of Tampâ,~iÛâ~ Commission for approval pursuant to which will, effective June 8, 1966, gen section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as and Cosdel International Co., San erally increase rates between Seattle, Francisco, Calif______FF—471 amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Wash., and ports in the Kodiak Island, U.S.C. 814). Dated: June 7,1966. Alaska Peninsula, and Aleutian Islands area of Alaska; Interested parties may inspect and T homas L is i, obtain a copy of the agreement(s) at . Secretary. Whereas, the Commission has con the Washington office of the Federal ■ Doc. 66-6401; Piled, June 9, 1966; sidered the new schedule and has reason Maritime Commission, 1321 H Street 8:48 a.m.] to believe that the said schedule may NW., Room 609; or may inspect agree result in rates, charges, and/or practices ments at the offices of the District Man which would be unjust, unreasonable, or AS!* AFR,CA SHIPPING CO., I agers, New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., otherwise unlawful in violation of the and San Francisco,'Calif. Comments LTD0 KAWASAKI KISEN KAI: Shipping Act, 1916 or the Intercoastal with reference to an agreement includ Shipping Act, 1933; ing a request for hearing, if desired, may Notice of Agreement Filed for Whereas, the Commission, is of the be submitted to the Secretary, Federal Approval opinion that said increases should be Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C., made the subject of a public investiga 20573, within 20 days after publication n given that the foU tion and hearing to determine whether of this notice in-the F ederal R egister. C o m S S , nr has med wiUi they are unjust or unreasonable or other A copy of any such statement should also sectS^i5 of the |??royal pursuant wise unlawful under the Shipping Act, be forwarded to the party filing the amended r?o ^ ®hlbpmg Act, 1916 1916, and the Intercoastal Shipping Act, agreement (as indicated hereinafter) US c l? 4 ) 733’ 75 Stat- » « . 1933. Now, therefore, it is ordered, That, and the comments should indicate that tain a^conv^f^«^ may insPect and pursuant to sections 18(a) and 22 of the this has been done. Shipping Act, 1916, and sections 3 and 4 Notice of agreement filed for approval Washington“leton OfficenL of e^ the reement Federal at Mi of the Intercoastal Shipping Act, 1933, by: FEDERAL REGISTER, V O I. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 8202 NOTICES Mr. Edward P. Cotter, Charrier & McAteer, cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) and the aggregate volumes shown in the follow Inc., 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Wash regulations under the Natural Gas Act ing table during the first 3 years of pro ington, D.C., 2006. (§ 157.10) on or before July 1, 1966. posed operations : Agreement 9554, between N.V. Ned- Take further notice that, pursuant to lloyd Lijnen and Hoegh Lines, an ap the authority contained in and subject First year Second year Third year proved joint service under Agreement to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Federal Power Commission by sections 7 Annual (Mcf)___ 385,178 585,389 943,981 7593, as amended, establishes a sailing Peak Pay (Mcf).- 2,014 4,013 arrangement for operation in the trade and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the 5,433 from United States ports to ports in the Commission’s rules of practice and pro Mediterranean, Red Sea, India, Pakistan, cedure, a hearing will be held without The estimated cost of the facilities pro Ceylon, Burma, Malaysia, Singapore, and further notice before the Commission on posed to be constructed by Applicant is Indonesia. The parties are to so ar this application if no protest or petition $3,134,806, which will not require any range sailings to avoid conflict and as to intervene is filed within the time re special financing, according to the appli best to provide for a spacing of their quired herein, if the Commission on its cation. total sailings made entirely in each own review of the matter finds that a Applicant estimates that Respondent party’s name and own account. The grant of the certificate is required by the will construct, pursuant to its “10-cent agreement also provides for Nedlloyd public convenience and necessity. If a formula”, 6.8 miles of 6-inch and 23.5 Lines, Inc., to be the general agents for protest or petition for leave to intervene miles of 4-inch transmission pipeline, both parties in the United States. is timely filed, or if the Commission on its necessary tie-ins, and seven metering sta own motion believes that a formal hear tions at a total estimated cost of $726,647. Dated: June 6,1966. ing is required, further notice of such Protests or petitions to intervene may By order of the Federal Maritime hearing will be duly given. be filed with the Federal Power Commis Commission. Under the procedure herein provided sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord T homas L is i, for, unless otherwise advised, it will be ance with the rules of practice and proce Secretary. unnecessary for Applicant to appear or dure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before be represented at the hearing. June 30, 1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-6365; Piled, June 9, 1966; J oseph H. Gutride, 8:46 a.m.] J oseph H. G utride, Secretary. Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 66-6367; Filed, June 9, 1966; [F.R. Doc. 66-6366; Filed, June 9, 1966; 8:46 a.m.] FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION 8:46 a.m.] [Docket No. CP66-388] [Docket No. CP66-390] [Docket No. CP66-387] ATLANTIC SEABOARD CORP. WISCONSIN GAS CO. AND MICH WISCONSIN GAS CO. AND MICH IGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. IGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. Notice of Application Notice of Application Notice of Application une J 3, 1966. J une 3 , 1966. J une 3, 1966. Take notice that on May 26, 1966, Take notice that on May 26,1966, Wis Atlantic Seaboard Corp. (Applicant), Take notice that on May 26,1966, Wis consin Gas Co. (Applicant), 626 East Post Office Box 1273, Charleston, W. Va., consin Gas Co. (Applicant), 626 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis., 25325, filed in Docket No. CP66-390 an Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis., 53202, filed in Docket No. CP66-388 an application pursuant to section 7(c) of 53202, filed in Docket No. CP66-387 an application pursuant to section 7(a) of the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of application pursuant to section 7(a) of the Natural Gas Act for an order of tne public convenience and necessity au the Natural Gas Act for an order of the Commission directing Michigan Wiscon thorizing the construction and operation Commission directing Michigan Wiscon sin Pipe Line Co. (Respondent) to estab of certain natural gas facilities, all as sin Pipe Line Co. (Respondent) to con lish physical connection of its transmis more fully set forth in the application struct certain natural gas transmission sion facilities with the facilities proposes which is on file with the Commission and facilities, to establish physical connection to be constructed by Applicant and to se open to public inspection. of its transmission facilities with facil and deliver to Applicant up to 321 Mcf o^ Specifically, Applicant seeks authori ities proposed to be constructed by Appli natural gas per day for resale and dis zation for the construction and opera cant and to sell and deliver to Applicant tribution in the villages of Auburndaie tion of approximately 1,185 feet of 36- up to 5,433 Mcf of gas per day in the and Milladore, Wis., all as more fully set inch O.D., electric weld, X-100 steel third year for resale and distribution in forth in the application which is onij pipeline at a point in its transmission the cities of Adams, Markesan, Montello, with the Commission and open to pumie Princeton, and Wautoma, Wis., and sev pipeline system in Grant County, W. Va., inspection. ... approximately 14 miles east of its Seneca eral villages in central Wisconsin, all as Applicant estimates the total w P P compressor station. more fully set forth in the application of natural gas which will be re^^r tv Applicant states that the issuance of which is on file with the Commission and Auburndaie and Milladore, Wood Co ■ a certificate authorizing the installation open to public inspection. Wis., during the first 3 years of proposeu and operation of the proposed 1,185 feet Applicant proposes to construct and operations, will be as follows: of X-100 pipeline, which was constructed operate distribution systems and portions as an experimental project in November of lateral pipelines to serve 25 cities and First year Second year Third ye»1 of 1964, is in order in that its only villages in central Wisconsin in the 51,283 alternative will be to replace the X-100 Counties of Green Lake, Marquette, 36,020 Waushara, Fond du Lac, Adams, and Annual (Mcf)___ 321 pipe with X-60 pipe as authorized in the Peak day (Mcf). . . 219 temporary certificate issued by the Com Waupaca. The specific communities to mission on June 17, 1965, in Docket No. be served, in addition to the cities listed above, are as follows: The villages of ipplicant proposes that ^ sp0I^ g CP65-122. Applicant further states that struct and operate two measmj such alternative would require the other Coloma, Endeavor, Fairwater, Fremont, Friendship, Hancock, Kingston, Lohr- tions, one each for Auburndaie wise unnecessary investment of sub ladore, and 4-inch transmission!) stantial funds. ville, Marquette, Neshkoro, Oxford, Plainfield, Redgranite, Westfield, and ;s from Respondent’s existing .^ The total actual cost of Applicant’s i and the proposed measuring s t t transmission pipeline facility, is $105,921. Wild Rose, and the unincorporated vil lages of Dalton, Manchester, Pack- , exact lengths of the tranOT^J Protests or petitions to intervene may elines, estimated to be 0.2 be filed with the Federal Power Commis waukee, Pine River, and Poy Sippi. Applicant estimates the natural gas re h case, are to be determined V . sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord indent’s “10-cent formula. ance with the rules of practice and pro quirements of these communities will FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 NOTICES 8203 cant proposes to construct and operate The estimated total cost of the facili section 212(b) and Transfer Rules, 49 complete distribution systems in Au- ties to be constructed by Applicant is CFR Part 179: bumdale and Milladore. $353,456, which will not require any No. MC-FC-68882. Application filed The estimated cost of construction of special financing. June 3, 1966, by DESPATCH MOVING the facilities to be installed by Appli Protests or petitions to intervene may & STORAGE CO., INC., c/o Skadden, cant is $112,828, which will not require be filed with the Federal Power Commis Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Esqs., 551 any special financing. sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in accord Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y., 10017, for Protests or petitions to intervene may ance with the rules of practice and pro temporary authority to lease the operat he filed with the Federal Power Commis cedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or before ing rights Of EDWARD BEERMANN, sion, Washington, D.C., 20426, in ac July 1,1966. doing business as DESPATCH MOVING cordance with the rules of practice and & STORAGE CO. AND DESPATCH E X procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10) on or J oseph H. Gutride, Secretary. PRESS CO., 428 West 108th Street, New before July 1, 1966. York, N.Y. Thè transfer to DESPATCH [F.R. Doc. 66-6369; Filed, June 9, 1966; J oseph H. Gtttride, 8:46 a.m.] MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., of the Secretary. operating rights of EDWARD BEER MANN, doing business as DESPATCH [F.R. Doc. 66-6368; Filed, June 9, 1966; MOVING & STORAGE CO. AND 8:46 a.m.] DESPATCH EXPRESS CO. is still INTERSTATE COMMERCE pending. [Docket No. CP66—389 ] COMMISSION [ seal] H. Neil G arson, WISCONSIN GAS CO. AND MICH Secretary. FOURTH SECTION APPLICATIONS [F.R. Doc. 66-6405; Filed, June 9, 1966; IGAN WISCONSIN PIPE LINE CO. FOR RELIEF 8 :49a.m ] Notice of Application J un e 6, 1966. Protests to the granting of an appli [Notice 1361—A] J une 3,1966. cation must be prepared in accordance Take notice that on May 26,1966, Wis with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER consin Gas Co. (Applicant), 626 East practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within PROCEEDINGS Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wis., 15 days from the date of publication of J u n e .7, 1966. 53202, filed in Docket No. CP66-389 an this notice in the F ederal R egister. application pursuant to section 7(a) of Synopses of orders entered pursuant to the Natural Gas Act for an order of the L ong- and-S hort H aul section 212 (b> of the Interstate Com Commission directing Michigan Wiscon FSA No. 40520—Returned shipments— merce Act, and rules and regulations pre sin Pipe Line Co. (Respondent) to estab beet or cane sugar. Filed by Western scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179), lish physical connectiQn of its trans Trunk Line Committee, agent (No. A- appear below: mission system with the facilities to be 2454), for interested rail carriers. Rates As provided in the Commission’s spe constructed by Applicant and to sell and -on beet or cane sugar, in carloads, on cial rules of practice any interested per deliver to Applicant up to 973 Mcf of shipments returned from original desti son may file a petition seeking reconsid natural gas per day for resale and dis nations in southwestern and western eration of the following numbered pro tribution in the village of Pulaski and trunkline territories, to original points ceedings within 20 days from the date of the unincorporated village of Krakow, of shipment in western trunkline and publication of this notice. Pursuant to Wis., all as more fully set forth in the transcontinental territories, also points section 17 (8) of the Interstate Commerce application which is on file with the in Montana. Act, the filing of such a petition will post Commission and open to public inspec- Grounds for relief—Carrier com pone the effective date of the order in petition. that proceeding pending its disposition. Applicant estimates the volumes of FSA No. 40521-^—Chlorine to Kinsgport, The matters felied upon by petitioners natural gas which will be required to Term. Filed by O. W. South, Jr., agent must be specified in their petitions with serve Pui^ki and Krakow during the (No. A4898), for interested rail carriers. particularity. nrst 3 years of proposed operations will Rates on chlorine, in tank carloads, from No. »MC-FC-68829. By order of May as follows: Charleston, Dock, Elk, Owens, South 31, 1966, the Transfer Board approved Charleston, and South Ruffner, W. Va., the transfer to Keystone Moving and First year Second year Third year to Kingsport, Tenn. Storage Co., a corporation, Lancaster, Grounds for relief—Market com Pa., of a portion of the operating rights Annual (Mel) 42,114 in certificate in No. MC-107831, issued Peak day (Mcf)V_‘ 81,108 143,363 petition. 190 663 973 Tariff—Supplement 202 to Traffic September 10, 1953, to Keystone Express Executive Association-Eastern Rail and Storage Co., Inc., Lancaster, Pa., au roads, agent, tariff ICC C-102. thorizing the transportation of : House coi52 fnt pr°P°ses that Respondent hold goods, between points in a specified one measuring station and a By the Commission. from rrsiisrotssion pipeline to extend part of Pennsylvania, on the one hand, transmj PPint on Respondent’s present [ seal] H. N e il Garson, and, on the other, points in New York, s ta tio n e rie s to the measuring Secretary. New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, Delaware, milesn’ A dlvtance of approximately 4.4 [F.R. Doc. 66—6355; FUed, June 9, 1966; Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, distaneeAK C.ant states that the exact 8:45 a.m.] °f the pipeline will be deter- Indiana, Illinois, Georgia, North Caro lina, South Carolina, the District of S f dor S !”nt to Respondent,s “10- [Notice 1361] Columbia, and the Lower Peninsula of operatpC+ht pr0EK?ses to construct and Michigan. Charles W. Singer, 33 North MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER La Salle Street, Chicago, 111., 60602, at lateral trJl? remainder erf the required PROCEEDINGS torney for applicants. and P i , £ S-miSS10n Pipeline for Krakow A ppliS ^ ’n ^Proximately 8.2 miles. J une 7, 1966. [seal] h . Neil G arson, ateP S i b S i also oonstruct and oper- Application filed for temporary au Secretary. munity bution systems in each com- thority under section 21(Ka) (b) in con [F.R. Doc. 66-6406; Filed. June 9, 1966; nection with transfer application under 8:49 am .] No. 112----- $ FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 112— FRIDAY, JUNE 10, 1966 S204 FEDERAL REGISTER CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— JUNE The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during June. Page 5 CFR 7 CFR—Continued g 14 CFR—Continued Page 213____ 7733, 7734, 7959, 8175 Proposed R ules—Continued P roposed R ules— Continued 550______7881 1067______—— 7831 73_____ 1______— 7977 1066______\___ — 7757 75______* ______—_ 7762 7 CFR 1068— ______7757 91______ï______8026 15______8175 1069— ______7757 93______8078 26______8113 1070— —____ 7831 _____— 7734 1071______7831 15 CFR 28______230______7737, 7819, 7968 354______: _____ 8113 1073—-.______7831 ______8175 1074______7831 P roposed R u l e s : 401___ ——------9 7833 701______7735, 7814 1075— ______- 7757 ______7814 1076___ — ______— 7757 728______— 16 CFR 778______7997 1078_____ — 7831 ______7999 1079______—______7831 13______7960, 7961, 8058-8060 811______15— ______7737, 7806 845______7815 1090— ______- ______— 7911 ______7816 1094_— ______— — — — 7831 P roposed R u l e s : 893_ —— ____— — 45______— 7757 905______— 8114 1096______7831 908______„ 7961 1097—_____ — ______- 7831 910 ______** _____ 7962, 8045 1098— ______— 7911 17 CFR 911 ______7962 1099______7758, 7831 211 ______— ______7821 916 ______1 8176, 8177 1101______— — 7911 230______7738 917 ______7963, 8114, 8177 1102— .______— 7831 239______7738 918 _____— ____—— 7735 1103______7831 240______- 7740 944______— ______8000 1104— ______7831 276______7821 970______—_ 8178 1106______7831 P roposed R ules : 1038 ______8115 1108____ 7831 270______7913 1039 ______8116 1*120______7831 1074______8000 1125 ______18 CFR- ______7757 1099__ - ______7963 1126______;______— 7831 _____ 7897 1127-______7831 101 ____ 1421—______. 7964, 8000, 8003 141______7897 1483______7817 1128______7831 __ 7897 1129— ______7831 201 ______1486______7735 260______7897 P roposed R u l e s : 1130 ______7831 51______- i____ — — 7757 1131 ______7757 20 CFR ______7971 1132 _ 7831 905______602 — ______7966 915_i _____- ______8181 1133 ______7757, 7831 ______8021 1134 ______— 7757P roposed R u l e s : 994______405______7864 1001—______7911 1136 ______7757 1002______7911 1137 _ ;______- ___ 7757 21 CFR 1138—______7757 1003______- ______7911 120______7741 1004— ______7911 8 CFR 121 ______8008,8009 1005______7911 130 8009 1008______7911 212______— 8045 1009______7911 214— ______— 8045 22 CFR 1011______— 7 9 ir 236____ 8045 41 7741 7741 1012______7911 9 CFR 42 7829, 7911, 8131 1013______97______8020 1015 ______7911 24 CFR ______7911 200 7743 1016 ___ 10 CFR 7743 1031 ______7831 221 ______7831 36______7959 1032 ___ 40______7959 1033 ______7911 25 CFR 7744 1034 ______7911 12 CFR ¿;; 1 ------7745 ______7911 1035 __ 1______— ______8060 1036 ______7911 1038 _- ______7831, 7971 204—.______8060 26 CFR 1039 ______7831,7972 563______— 8004 7789 1040 _ — ______7911 571___ .______8004 1041 ______7911 14 CFR 31 CFR 1043 ______7911 10Q 8179 1044 _ — ______7831 39 ______7735, 7881, 7882, 8045, 8046 202------——— ______78 1045 ______7831 71—______7736, 202------____ 7899 1046 __ .______7911 7827, 8046, 8047, 8117, 8178, 8179 7 7 4 5 ,789» 1047-______7911 73 _ 7736, 7827, 7882 500______1048 ______i ______7911 75______7736, 7827, 8047 32 CFR ______7911 97______7883, 7893, 8010, 8048,8118 7807 1049 __ 1 1051______7831 Proposed R ules: 1061______7831 21______8075 1062______7831 47 ______8077 1063 ______7831 71______7760-7762, 1064 ______7831 7836, 7975-7977, 8025, 8077, 8078, 1065 ______7757 8182, 8183. FEDERAL REGISTER 8205 Page Page 32 CFR— Continued 41 CFR 47 CFR Page 30______7814 l - 3 „ ______8116 18------7821 273______8007 4-1______7819 21------7822 502______7966 4-6______¿i 7819 73— ————— 7904, 8067, 8069-8073 12 5 0 ______—. 8061 4-50______7902 &-l____ :______74— ------7822 7820 91------7822 32A CFR &-2______7820 101-15-______P roposed R ules : OIA (Ch. X) : 7752 101-17______— — 8117 1—------7837 Ol REG. 1___ —:______7745 21— ------7837 42 CFR 23------7837 33 CFR 57______7755 73 ------7837, 7838, 8079-8081, 8132 203 ______7827 76______7902 74 ------7837, 8026 204 ______8129 81------7837 43 CFR 87------7837 208______7751 3120______4 0 1______8062 7806 89------: 7837 P ublic L and Orders: 91------7837 36 CFR 4023—— ___ 7969 93------•------7837 4024 ______7969 95------7837 2 2 1______8180 4025____ — ______l_Z 7969 97------7837 2 5 1— ______i _ 7899 P roposed R u l e s : 261______7902 3130______8181 49 CFR ' 3140______8181 95______3150—___ 7806, 8064 38 CFR 8181 P roposed R u l e s : 3160______8181 170______17______8064 3180—____ — ------7841 8181 193______7911 39 CFR 45 CFR 50 CFR 801-____ 7755 13______7752 22...... 32— — — ------7909, 8065 7752 46 CFR 33______25______7756, 7910, 7970 7752 202 8065 P roposed R u l e s : 43...... 7752 308_____ 7970 401______------8130 PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES Now available Lyndon B. Johnson 1963-64 Book I (November 22, 1963 to June 30, 1964) Price $6.75 Book II (July 1, 1964 to December 31, 1964) Price $7.0Q Contents • Messages to the Congress • Public speeches and letters • The President’s news conferences • Radio and television reports to the American people • Remarks to informal groups Prior volumes Published by Prior voliimes covering most of the Truman Office of the Federal Register administration and all of the Eisenhower and National Archives and Records Service Kennedy years are available at comparable General Services Administration prices from the Superintendent of Documents, Order from Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Superintendent of Documents 20402. U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402