Poplar Point Redevelopment Draft EIS, Nov 2010, Chapter 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Poplar Point Redevelopment Draft EIS, Nov 2010, Chapter 3 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT This page is intentionally left blank 3.1 SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESOURCES This page is intentionally left blank Poplar Point Redevelopment Draft Environmental Impact Statement 3.1.1 Land Use The Poplar Point Project Area is located within Anacostia Park in the southeast quadrant of Washington, DC. Land uses within and around the Project Area were inventoried to characterize the current setting. The inventories were conducted using existing reports, field inspections and surveys, comprehensive plans, aerial photography, and maps. The Land Use study area includes the Poplar Point Project Area and a surrounding context area with a radius of approximately one to two miles. A larger study area is necessary for this analysis because changes to land use or development patterns at the scale contemplated under the Action Alternatives would likely have impacts beyond the immediate location. 3.1.1.1 Project Area Land Uses The current land use classification for the Project Area is parkland/open space. Specific land uses within Poplar Point include the NPS Administrative Complex, former plant nurseries, transportation infrastructure, and parkland/open space. The remainder of the Project Area, including southern Anacostia Park and the North Field, consists of parkland/open space. Specific land uses include the Anacostia Field House, boat launch, riverwalk, playfields, playgrounds, picnic facilities, tennis and basketball courts, meadows, a skate pavilion, and parking. 3.1.1.2 Adjacent Land Uses There are a variety of land uses within the vicinity of the Poplar Point Project Area. While the adjacent areas generally consist of infrastructure or government use, there are a number of existing residential neighborhoods and ongoing redevelopment projects in the nearby area. Figure 3.1.1 shows the existing and proposed uses in the vicinity of the Project Area. The northern portion of Anacostia Park is located north and west of the Project Area. It contains a total of more than 1,200 acres, including the Project Area, and extends north to encompass Kenilworth Park and Aquatic Gardens, the Langston Golf Course and Kenilworth Marsh. Anacostia Park is owned by the federal government and managed by NPS. A large parking garage for WMATA’s Anacostia Station occupies approximately 9 acres adjacent to the Poplar Point Project Area. The Metro garage serves riders on Metro’s Green Line. Also adjacent to the Project Area, the Howard Road parcels encompass approximately 11 acres of land located along Howard Road north of I- 295. These parcels are privately owned and have been in negotiations for redevelopment. Other nearby uses include a WASA pump station located amongst the ramps leading to the Anacostia Freeway, and the Anacostia Naval Station. The pump station is a two-story structure that pumps combined wastewater from the Anacostia Main Interceptor to the outfall sewers that lead to the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Anacostia Naval Station is located west of the Project Area and it is home to the Defense Information System Agency’s White House Communications Agency and the Navy Housing Office. Bolling Air Force Base is located south of the Anacostia Naval Station near the confluence of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers. It hosts the 11th Wing and the primary mission is to provide comprehensive Affected Environment 3.1-1 Socio-Economic Resources Poplar Point Redevelopment base operating support to all assigned Air Force organizations and personnel along with flagship ceremonial and musical ambassadorship worldwide. 3.1-2 Affected Environment Poplar Point Redevelopment Draft Environmental Impact Statement Figure 3.1.1 Site Context Map Source: AECOM, 2010 Affected Environment 3.1-3 Socio-Economic Resources Poplar Point Redevelopment 3.1.1.3 Surrounding Land Uses The larger community surrounding the Poplar Point Project Area includes a variety of neighborhoods located east and west of the Anacostia River (See Figure 3.1.2). The Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) Avenue business corridor serves as the main commercial spine of historic Anacostia. The predominant land use along MLK Avenue is mixed-use with retail and commercial businesses occupying most of the buildings’ ground floors, with office and residential uses on the upper floors. Anacostia Heights is a geographically large neighborhood located directly south of MLK Avenue and bounded to the northeast by Good Hope Road, to the southwest by Howard Road, and to the southeast by Fort Stanton Park. The predominant land use in the neighborhood is residential, as it primarily consists of single- family detached and row housing. The Fairlawn neighborhood is located north of Anacostia Heights and east of the MLK Avenue business corridor. Existing uses include single-family detached residential houses and several multi-family residential buildings. The Barry Farm neighborhood is located adjacent to historic Anacostia and consists of multi-family units of public housing. A redevelopment plan for Barry Farm was completed in 2006 and proposes strategies to increase residential capacity and physically improve the neighborhood in conjunction with a financial strategy to accomplish the vision. The goal of the plan is to create a community that provides affordable housing options, civic and cultural engagement, economic opportunity, and increased safety. The plan attempts to reestablish a connection with the greater Anacostia community and integrate itself with concurrent redevelopment efforts. In addition to these existing residential and commercial areas, the St. Elizabeths campus is currently undergoing redevelopment. The District operates a hospital on the east campus and has prepared a plan for its redevelopment. The west campus was acquired by the General Services Administration (GSA) in 2004 and is currently being developed with federal office space to house the Department of Homeland Security. West of the River, the Capitol Riverfront Area is also undergoing redevelopment. The Washington National’s Ballpark was completed in 2008, but the mix of retail, restaurant, conference, and other uses planned for the perimeter of the Ballpark have not yet been fully implemented. In particular, the WMATA bus garage and the Florida Rock batch cement plant are currently slated for redevelopment as mixed-use projects. In addition, nearby Buzzard Point contains a power plant owned and operated by PEPCO that is expected to be retired by 2012 and available for redevelopment. The Southeast Federal Center (SEFC) is located across the Anacostia River from the Project Area, immediately west of the Washington Navy Yard. It is being redeveloped as “The Yards,” a mixed-use, higher-density neighborhood on the waterfront with residential, retail, and commercial space. The 42-acre development will ultimately include 3.2 million square feet of residential and office space and more than 5 acres of open space, including a new waterfront park that recently opened. The development is planned as a multi-phased project, anticipated to take between 10 and 20 years to fully complete. 3.1-4 Affected Environment Poplar Point Redevelopment Draft Environmental Impact Statement The Washington Navy Yard is located directly across the Anacostia River from the Project Area and is a secure, active military center. A waterfront promenade runs along the Navy Yard’s water frontage, ending at the property line between the Navy Yard and the Southeast Federal Center. There is currently no waterfront connection between the Navy Yard and bordering properties. East Potomac Park is a large expanse of open space in the southwest quadrant of Washington, DC. It is located at the confluence of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers. The park contains public recreational facilities such as East Potomac Golf Course, a mini-golf course, a public pool, and the East Potomac Tennis Center. Affected Environment 3.1-5 Socio-Economic Resources Poplar Point Redevelopment Figure 3.1.2 Anacostia Neighborhoods Map Source: AECOM, 2010 Affected Environment 3.1-6 Poplar Point Redevelopment Draft Environmental Impact Statement 3.1.2 Planning Controls and Policies The federal land transfer and redevelopment of Poplar Point is subject to several plans and policies put forth by a variety of regulatory agencies. The controls that guide land use planning at both the federal and local levels establish the regulatory framework for the sites’ potential development. A review of these plans and policies is provided below. 3.1.2.1 Federal Plans and Policies Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital: Federal Elements The Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital is the principal planning document for the National Capital region. The Comprehensive Plan includes both Federal and District Elements (described below) and contains goals, objectives, and planning policies to guide growth and development in the District of Columbia and the greater metropolitan area. Federal Environment: The Federal Environment Element of the Comprehensive Plan states: “it is the goal of the federal government to conduct its activities and manage its property in a manner that promotes the National Capital Region as a leader in environmental stewardship and preserves, protects, and enhances the quality of the region’s natural resources, providing a setting that benefits the local community, provides a model for the country, and is worthy of a national Capital.” The policies relevant to local water quality include upgrading the sewage treatment system and separating it from the sanitary sewer
Recommended publications
  • Pull Together Fall/Winter 2014
    Preservation, Education, and Commemoration Vol. 53, No. 1 Fall-Winter 2013/2014 PULL TOGETHER Newsletter of the Naval Historical Foundation An AEGIS Legacy: Wayne Meyer’s History War Rooms, Page 3 Remembering September 16, 2013. Page 6 Also in the issue: Olympia update, pp. 9–10 ; Navy Museum News, pp. 12–13; Naval History News, pp. 14–16; News from the NHF, pp. 17–20; Remembering Rear Admiral Kane pp. 22-23. Message From the Chairman Last month, you received the Foundation’s year-end appeal from our president, Rear Adm. John Mitchell. If you sent your donations earlier this year, or in response to this appeal, thank you! For those of you contemplating a gift, I hope you’ll refl ect on our successes in “preserving and honoring the legacy of those who came before us; educating and inspiring the generations who will follow.” We’ve got much left to do, and your support makes all the difference. This is a great time to make that tax-deductible donation or IRA distribution direct to NHF! The year-end appeal featured a 1948 letter from then-NHF Vice President Fleet Adm. Chester W. Nimitz to then-NHF President Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King referring to the budget and political woes encountered 65 years ago in the nation’s capital: “I, for one, am glad to be away from that trouble spot….” Yet despite the challenges King faced, including a series of debilitating strokes, he remained strongly committed to growing the NHF and educating the American public about this nation’s great naval heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebrating Navy Women: Perseverance & Achievements
    Celebrating Navy Women: Perseverance & Achievements omen have profoundly impacted our Navy for more than a century, since being Wallowed to join in 1917. To honor those pioneers who have led the way, along with the more than 60,000 women who serve today, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday and Mrs. Linda Gilday, in coordination with Navy History and Heritage Command, created a display in CNO’s residence, Tingey House, as well as this e-book, which is organized into the following groupings: WWII era and prior; a selection of women ‘firsts’ in the Navy; and some photos of today’s Sailors. Where additional information is available, the photos are hyperlinked to articles, videos, and oral histories (click the photo to access the files). While we know this is a small representation of the women who serve today and the millions who have served, it is our hope it sparks conversation that honors women who wear the cloth of this nation. As a Navy, we celebrate the many accomplishments that women have achieved through hard work, grit and determination. Chief Yeoman (F) Loretta Perfectus Walsh After enlisting on March 17, 1917, Chief Walsh became not only the woman to serve in the Navy and its first female Chief Petty Officer, but also the first woman to serve in a non-nursing capacity in any branch of the armed forces. She served as a Yeoman (F) in the U.S. Naval Reserve during WWI. The first enlisted women in the Navy. Recruited to serve for the duration of WWI in order to free up male personnel for duty at sea, nearly 11,000 women were in uniform by Armistice Day (November 11, 1918).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Navy
    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES FY 2017 Program MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVE FORCE (MCON) AND FAMILY HOUSING PROGRAMS JUSTIFICATION DATA As Submitted to Congress February 2016 The estimated cost for this report for the Department of the Navy (DON) is $57,755. The estimated total cost for supporting the DON budget justification material is approximately $1,834,000 for the 2016 fiscal year. This includes $75,200 in supplies and $1,758,800 in labor. Part 1: Military Construction Active Force (MCON) Part 2: Family Housing Blank Page TAB: MCON DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 BUDGET ESTIMATES FY 2017 Program MILITARY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVE FORCE (MCON) JUSTIFICATION DATA Submitted to Congress February 2016 2016-02-02(0811) Blank Page DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 Military Construction Table of Contents A. MILITARY CONSTRUCTION (MILCON) B. EUROPEAN REASSURANCE INITIATIVE (ERI) MILCON C. OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS (OCO) MILCON D. HOST COUNTRY IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS PROJECTS Blank Page DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 Military Construction Table of Contents STATE LIST i INDEX OF LOCATIONS iii INDEX OF LOCATIONS (NAVY) vii INDEX OF LOCATIONS (MARINES) xi MISSION STATUS INDEX xiii INSTALLATION INDEX xv APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE xvii SPECIAL PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS xix PROJECT JUSTIFICATIONS - INSIDE THE UNITED STATES 1 PROJECT JUSTIFICATIONS - OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES 159 PLANNING AND DESIGN 197 UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION 199 Blank Page DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY FY 2017 Military Construction Summary of Locations
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Naval Crim~ Investigative Servi~
    U.S. NAVAL CRIM~ INVESTIGATIVE SERVI~ TlnE: V/BOORDA, JEREMY MICHAEUAOM-USN CCN: 16MAY96-DCWA-0278-7HRR INVESTIGATIVE ACTION: CNO VEHICLE INVENTORY RESULTS On 16MAY96 at 1715, an inventory of the vehicle assigned to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), ADM J.M. Boorda, was conducted. The inventory was assisted by Off icer ~b(6 ), (b)(?)(C) I Metro crime Lab (MCL), Metro Police Department (MPD). The following information pertains. · The vehicle inventoried was a 1995 Lincoln Towncar, ~ blue, Washinqton DC tag 140-156. The CNO' s rimar driver is b(6l. ~b(6), (b)(?)(C) :J USMC, Telephone: Office b(6), (b)(?)(C) Pa er: b 6>· ' b(6), (b)(?)(C) ~e CNO' s alternate driver s b(6). (b)(?)(C) . The vehicle was parked in the circular dr veway rec y in front of the residence of the CNO, Washinqton Navy Yard, Washington, DC. The exterior and interior of the vehicle was observed to be extremely clean. The vehicle was equipped with three mobile telephones headsets with two assigned tele hone numbers. The drivers mobile telephone number was b(6). (b)(?)(C) A secured STU- 3 mobile tele hone was noted in the ac sea w assigned number b(6), (b)(?)(C) A second STU-3 headset was also i n the front seat rec y es e the drivers mobile telephone. One portable cellular telephone was located in the front seat of t e eh' c e however, it was learned it was the personal property of b(6>. (b)(?)(C) ellular telephone was seized and relinquished to Officer , MCL for the subsequent entry into the MPD evidence custody Y m.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal FERC Emails Show Rift with EPA Over Utility MACT
    Release 4 - HQ-FOI-01268-12 All emails sent by "Richard Windsor" were sent by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson 01268-EPA-6128 Gina McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US To Laura Vaught cc "[email protected]", 12/13/2011 09:09 PM "[email protected]", "Joel Beauvais", Bob Perciasepe, Brendan Gilfillan, "Dru Ealons", "[email protected]", "Joseph Goffman", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "Stephanie Owens", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", "[email protected]", Joseph Goffman, Janet McCabe bcc Subject RE: Internal FERC emails show rift with EPA over utility MACT (b)(5) Deliberative From: Laura Vaught/DC/USEPA/US To: Bob Perciasepe/DC/USEPA/US Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Joel Beauvais" <[email protected]>, Brendan Gilfillan/DC/USEPA/US, "Dru Ealons" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Joseph Goffman" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Gina McCarthy" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Stephanie Owens" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: 12/13/2011 08:50 PM Subject: RE: Internal FERC emails show rift with EPA over utility MACT Attached are some FERC quotes from a hearing that might be helpful.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-18-218, MILITARY HOUSING PRIVATIZATION: DOD Should Take
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees March 2018 MILITARY HOUSING PRIVATIZATION DOD Should Take Steps to Improve Monitoring, Reporting, and Risk Assessment GAO-18-218 March 2018 MILITARY HOUSING PRIVATIZATION DOD Should Take Steps to Improve Monitoring, Reporting, and Risk Assessment Highlights of GAO-18-218, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In 1996 Congress provided DOD with The Department of Defense (DOD) has regularly assessed the financial authorities enabling it to obtain private- condition of its privatized housing projects; however, it has not used consistent sector financing and management to measures or consistently assessed future sustainment (that is, the ability to repair, renovate, construct, and maintain the housing in good condition), or issued required reports to Congress operate military housing. DOD has in a timely manner. Specifically: since privatized 99 percent of its domestic housing. • Some data used to report on privatized housing across the military services are not comparable. For example, there are inconsistencies among the The Senate Report accompanying a projects in the measurements of current financial condition (for example, the bill for the National Defense ability to pay debts and maintain quality housing).These differences have not Authorization Act for 2017 included a provision that GAO review privatized been identified in reports to Congress. military housing projects and the effect • The military departments vary in the extent to which they use measures of of recent changes in the basic future sustainment, and information regarding the sustainment of each of the allowance for housing on long-term privatized housing projects has not been included in the reports to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Leadership in the Twentieth
    BOOK REVIEWS David Baird. Northern Lights: Lighthouses of aboard the vessels were saved. [228-229] Canada. Toronto: Lynx Images, 1999.245 pp., Through Baird's photographs, the reader is photographs (black and white, colour), maps, introduced to seldom-seen, isolated references, selected readings, index. CDN lightstations like Bellie Isle, Newfoundland [ $29.95, paper; ISBN 1-894073-09-6. 39-40] and Flat Island, Québec. [161] Images of crumbling lights at Southwest Point, Québec Canada's coasts are dotted with a huge variety [132] and Mohawk Island, Ontario [174] show of lighthouses. From Newfoundland's iron- how destaffing and abandonment has left many clad lights, to the squat wooden harbour bea- lighthouses to deteriorate. cons of the Maritimes and the slender concrete Baird notes that during the past twenty- towers in British Columbia, more than 600 five years "Canada's lighthouses have been structures remain active aids to navigation. changed forever by automation." He acknowl- Although satellite technology and automation edges that the architectural and technical char- have made them less important to mariners, acteristics of lighthouses are "liable to frequent Canada's remaining lighthouses are an impor- change" due to shifts in navigational require- tant element of the nations's maritime history. ments. Although Baird claims that his text David Baird's Northern Lights: Light- describes the current state of lighthouses in houses of Canada is the first book to look at Canada, there are a number of persistent factual navigation beacons across the country. The errors in the book. For example, he consistently author professes a lifelong interest in lights, and incorrectly identifies fog detectors (the beginning with a childhood friendship with the devices used to turn fog horns off and on son of the Partridge Island, NB, lightkeeper.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES The D.C. Inventory of Historic Sites is the official list of historic properties maintained by the Government of the District of Columbia. These properties are deemed worthy of recognition and protection for their contribution to the cultural heritage of the city that is both national capital and home to more than a half million residents. The Inventory had its beginnings in 1964 and remains a work in progress. It is being continually expanded as additional survey and research supports new designations and more complete documentation of existing listings. At present, there are about 600 entries, covering more than 535 landmark buildings, 100 other structures, and 100 parks and places. There are also about two dozen designated building clusters and another two dozen neighborhood historic districts encompassing an estimated 23,500 buildings. Complete professional documentation of such a large number of properties to current preservation standards is an extensive undertaking that is still incomplete. For this reason, some listings in the Inventory provide a full description of the historic property, while others provide outline information only. Organization: The layout of the Inventory is designed to promote understanding of significant properties within their historic context. Designations are grouped by historical time period and theme, rather than being listed in alphabetical order. For organizational purposes, the historical development of the District of Columbia is divided into six broad historical eras, with separate sections on early Georgetown and Washington County, the port town and outlying countryside that were separate legal entities within the District for most of the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarters A, Washington Navy Yard
    £#090/m Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COUNTYr NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) piiiili COMMON: Quarters A, Washington Navy Yard AND/OR HISTORIC: Tingey House Commandant©s House STREET AND NUMBER: East of Main Gate and South of M Street, S.E. in the Navy Yard CITY OR TOWN: Washington (Congressman Walter E. Fauntroy, District of Columbia) District of Columbia TT District of Columbia 001 Illlilllliiiiliiiii CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC D District j»] Building Public Public Acquisition: ft"1 Occupied Yes: Q Restricted [J Site Q Structure Private || In Process II Unoccupied | | Unrestricted D Object Both | | Being Considered Q Preservation work in progress H No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) I I Agricultural I | Government D Park I I Transportation I I Comments | | Commercial | | Industrial P^l Private Residence G Other (Specify) O Educational S Military I I Religious I I Entertainment [| Museum I | Scientific OWNER©S NAME: United States of America (Jurisdiction, U.S. Na STREET AND NUMBER: Cl TY OR TOWN: COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Recorder of Deeds STREET AND NUMBER: 6th and D Streets, N W CITY OR TOWN: Washington District of Columbia 11 TITLE OF SURVEY: Proposed District of Columbia Additions to the National Reg ister of Historic Places recommended by the Joint Committee on Landmarks DATE OF SURVEY: March 7, 1968 Federol State Q County Q Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: National Capital Planning Commission STREET AND NUMBER: 1326 G Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • £#090/M Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
    £#090/m Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE COUNTYr NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER (Type all entries — complete applicable sections) piiiili COMMON: Quarters A, Washington Navy Yard AND/OR HISTORIC: Tingey House Commandant©s House STREET AND NUMBER: East of Main Gate and South of M Street, S.E. in the Navy Yard CITY OR TOWN: Washington (Congressman Walter E. Fauntroy, District of Columbia) District of Columbia TT District of Columbia 001 Illlilllliiiiliiiii CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC D District j»] Building Public Public Acquisition: ft"1 Occupied Yes: Q Restricted [J Site Q Structure Private || In Process II Unoccupied | | Unrestricted D Object Both | | Being Considered Q Preservation work in progress H No PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) I I Agricultural I | Government D Park I I Transportation I I Comments | | Commercial | | Industrial P^l Private Residence G Other (Specify) O Educational S Military I I Religious I I Entertainment [| Museum I | Scientific OWNER©S NAME: United States of America (Jurisdiction, U.S. Na STREET AND NUMBER: Cl TY OR TOWN: COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: Recorder of Deeds STREET AND NUMBER: 6th and D Streets, N W CITY OR TOWN: Washington District of Columbia 11 TITLE OF SURVEY: Proposed District of Columbia Additions to the National Reg ister of Historic Places recommended by the Joint Committee on Landmarks DATE OF SURVEY: March 7, 1968 Federol State Q County Q Local DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: National Capital Planning Commission STREET AND NUMBER: 1326 G Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Minutes of the Secretary of the Navy's Advisory Subcommittee
    Description of document: Meeting minutes of the Secretary of the Navy's Advisory Subcommittee on Naval History, 1973, 1978, 1980, 2006- 2008; the Annual Report for 1998, 2001, 2004, and 2005; and the History Associates Report for 2000 titled "History & Heritage in U.S. Navy Requested date: 08-July-2014 Released date: 21-July-2016 Posted date: 29-August-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request ATTN: NHHC FOIA 805 Kidder Breese Street Building 200 Washington, DC 20374 FOIA Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL HISTORY AND HERITAGE COMMAND 805 KIDDER BREESE STREET SE WASHINGTON NA VY YARD DC 20374-5060 IN REPLY REFER TO 5720 SerHAD/662 July 21, 2016 SUBJECT: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST CASE NUMBER DON-NAVY-2014-007412 This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated July 8, 2014, in which you requested a copy of the meeting minutes of the Secretary of the Navy's Advisory Subcommittee on Naval History (or its direct predecessor) for the last ten (10) meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Residence on H Street N.W.: Mrs. General Hamilton “[T]He History of Many Other Interesting Things There Is Now Lost in the Mist of the Years.” John B
    1 In 1848 Alexander Hamilton’s widow, Elizabeth Schuyler Hamilton, rented a house on H Street in Washington owned by Britannia Peter Kennon of Tudor Place. This house was inherited by Britannia through a series of events that included her marriage to Captain Beverley Kennon in 1842, his advancing naval career, and his sudden death in 1844 aboard the U.S.S. Princeton. At the home on H Street, Eliza Hamilton was in the social hub of the city, where she engaged with such notable neighbors as former first lady Dolley Madison and General Winfield Scott. In this article, Archivist Wendy Kail describes the details of the property acquisition, the tragic event that sent Britannia back to Tudor Place, and the activities that took place in and around the H Street house during Mrs. Hamilton’s tenancy. The Residence on H Street N.W.: Mrs. General Hamilton “[T]he history of many other interesting things there is now lost in the mist of the years.” John B. Larner, “Some Reminiscences of Mrs. John M. Binckley of Early Days in Washington.” Records of the Columbia Historical Society Volume 29-30 (Washington, D.C.: The Society, 1928), 352. Captain Beverley Kennon (1793-1844) was born in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, the son of Elizabeth Beverley Munford Kennon (1762-ca.1825/1830) and General Richard Kennon (1759- 1805) of Fine Wood, Mecklenburg, Virginia. Beverley Kennon’s father, Richard Kennon, had served with great distinction in the Revolutionary War, where he was a member of General George Washington’s staff; he was County Lieutenant of Mecklenburg County in 1789 and Speaker of the Virginia Senate in 1801.
    [Show full text]