DOCSLIB.ORG

Lommutdtive Rings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lommutdtive Rings i Lommutdtive Revised Edition Rings IRVING KAPLANSKY ---_I- The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London Lontents To Chellie Preface ix Preface to the Revised Edition xi IRVING KAPLANSKY is George Herbert Mead Chapter 1 Prime Ideals and Integral Extensions 1 Distinguished Service Professor in the 1-1 Prime Ideals 1 Department of Mathematics, the University 1-2 Integral Elements, I 8 of Chicago. He is the author of numerous 1-3 G-ideals, Hilbert Rings, and the Nullstellensatz 12 books and articles and is the general editor 1-4 Localization 22 of the Chicago Lectures in Mathematics series published by the University of Chicago Press. 1-5 Prime Ideals in Polynomial Rings 25 [1974] 1-6 Integral Elements, I1 27 Chapter 2 Noetherian Rings 47 2-1 The Ascending Chain Condition 47 2-2 Zero-divisors 54 2-3 Integral Elements, I11 66 The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London 2-4 Intersections of Quasi-local Domains 75 @ 1970, 1974 by The University of Chicago Chapter 3 Macaulay Rings and Regular Rings 84 All rights reserved. Revised edition published I974 3-1 R-sequences and Macaulay Rings 84 Printed in the United States of America 3-2 The Principal Ideal Theorem 104 International Standard Book Number: 0-226-42454-3 3-3 Regular Rings 115 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 71-102759 Chapter 4 Homological Aspects of Ring Theory 123 4-1 Homology 123 4-2 Unique Factorization 130 4-3 The Euler Characteristic 137 4-4 Change of Rings for Injective Dimension 149 4-5 Gorenstein Rings 156 4-6 Duality 165 Notes 169 Bibliography 171 Index of Theorems 174 Index of Topics 181 V PreFdce This account of commutative rings has grown over the years through various stages. The first version was an appendix to the notes on homo- logical dimension issued in 1959 (these notes, without the appendix, have now appeared as Part I11 of [26]). The second was a crude 49 page dittoed manuscript written in 1961. This account was expanded in the 1965-6 course presented at Queen Mary College. I owe an enormous debt to Professor Paul M. Cohn of Bedford College for his expert job in writing up the course; large parts are incorporated here with only small changes. A draft of the book was prepared during the summer of 1968, and was used for a course at Chicago during 1968-9. No attempt has been made to achieve scholarly completeness. Refer- ences to sources have been made only in scattered instances where it seemed particularly desirable, and the bibliography contains only items to which there is an actual reference. My intention is to give an account of some topics in the theory of commutative rings in a way that is acces- sible to a reader with a modest background in modern algebra; I assume only an acquaintance with the definitions and most elementary proper- ties of rings, ideals, and modules. More exactly, this is true till $4-1, where I presuppose the theory of homological dimension as developed in [26], and 54-4 where use of the long exact sequence for Ext begins. I hope that readers will find it feasible to go on from this book to a deeper study of the literature. It would be most urgent to learn the theory of completion and the Cohen structure theorems. I have inserted numerous exercises, partly to cover additional ma- terial of lesser importance, and partly to give the reader a chance to test his growing skill. There is occasional reliance on the exercises as part of the exposition, and I hope no r ader will find this inconvenient. In the style of Landau, or Hard ,and Wright, I have presented the s vii ... Vlll PREFACE material as an Unbroken series of theorems. I prefer this to the n-place decimal system favored by some authors, and I have also grown tired of seeing a barrage of lemmas, propositions, corollaries, and scholia (whatever they are). I admit that this way the lowliest lemma gets ele- vated to the same eminence as the most awesome theorem. Also, the number of theorems becomes impressive, so impressive that I felt the need to add an index of theorems. All rings have a unit element, except for a fleeting instant in Ex. 22 Preface of $2-2. All rings are commutative except in several (not quite so fleet- ing) isolated passages. Somewhat erratically, the adjective ~~~~~~~~~- tive” is occasionally inserted, merely for emphasis. to the Revised Edition I am very grateful to Joel Cohen, David Eisenbud, Graham Evans, Marshall Fraser, Ross Hamsher, William Heinzer, Martin Isaacs, Stanley Kochman, Peter Kohn, Stephen McAdam, Judith Sally, and Wolmer Vasconcelos for numerous valuable suggestions. If fully credited, their names would be everywhere dense. Robert Gilmer was In this reprinting of Commutative Rings minor slips have been corrected especially generous in reading the manuscript critically and enlightening and several more substantial changes have been made (largely in the me on many points. exercises). I am indebted to many students and colleagues; they are too Final thanks go to Joyce Bolden and Diane Moore for a splendid job numerous to list, but I am none the less appreciative. of typing, and to Sylvia Clark, Gerald Curtis, and Mary Johnson of In a brief new section entitled “Notes” I have added some comments Allyn and Bacon, Inc. for their fine cooperation. which are in the nature of afterthoughts rather than a revision of the text. IRVING UPLANSKY CHAPTER 1 Prime Ideals md Integral Extensions 1-1’ PRIME IDEALS I- >r Prime ideals pl$ a central role in the theory of commutative rings, and it is appropriate to devote the first section to a collection of ob- servations concerning them. We recall the definition: in a commutative ring R, the ideal I is prime if ab e I implies a e I or b E I. Alternatively: I is prime if R/I is an integral domain. The convention that R itself is not regarded as a prime ideal is fairly universally accepted now, and we shall adhere to it (except, no doubt, for occasional sllps). In the ring of integers there is an analogous convention that 1 is not a prime. Let S be the set-theoretic complement of an ideal I. Then the defini- tion of a prime ideal can be recast as follows: I is prime if and only if S is multiplicatively closed. Now it goes without saying that I is maximal with respect to the exclusion of .S,Krull discovered a very useful con- verse. “1 I Theorem 1. Let S be a multiplicatively closed set in a ring R and let I be an ideal in R maximal with respect to the exclusion of S. Then I is prime. Proof. Given ab e I we must show that a or b lies in I. Suppose the contrary. Then the ideal (I, a) generated by I and a is strictly larger 1 2 CH. I/PRIMEIDEALS AND INTEGRAL EXTENSIONS SEC. PRIME IDEALS 3 than I and therefore intersects S. Thus there exists an element s1 e S of 1. The set consisting of 1 is multiplicatively closed. Its saturation is the form s1 = il + xa (il e I, x e R). Similarly we have s2 e S, s2 = iz + yb. the set of all units. The prime ideals maximal in the complement are But then just the ordinary maximal ideals. 2. Let S be the set of all non-zero-divisors in R. S is a saturated (1) s1s2 = (il + xa)(i2 + yb) multiplicatively closed set. So: the- zerg-divisors in R are a union of prime ideals. The prime ideals‘maximal among these might be called and all four terms on the right of (1) lie in Z (the first three because a ‘the “maximal primes of zero-divisors.” ~ factor lies in Z and the fourth because ab e Z). Hence s1s2e Z, a contra- --j.”;:. diction. Both of these illustrations admit appropriate generalizations to C’ modules: in the first case take all elements of R that act one-to-one and We note that, given any ideal J disjoint from a multiplicatively closed onto as multiplications of the given R-module; in the second case take set S, we can by Zorn’s lemma expand J to an ideal Z maximal with all non-zero-divisors on the module. This second case is important respect to disjointness from S. Thus we have a method of constructing enough to merit a definition. prime ideals. Before proceeding, let us examine more closely the complement of Definition. Let R be any commutative ring, A any non-zero R- a prime ideal. It is not any old multiplicatively closed set; it has the module. The prime ideals maximal within the zero-divisors on A are further property of being saturated in the sense that along with an called the maximal primes of A. When A has the form R/I, I an ideal element x it containsLan the divisors of x. We are led to the following in R, we say maximal primes of I, rather than of R/Z; the danger of tLeorem, in essence a sharpenin6 of Theorem 1. ambiguity is slight. I %’ b #!, ;* n At this point we shall briefly discuss unique factorization domains Theorem 2. The following statements on a set S in a ring R are (UFD’s). They can be characterized by a suitable interplay between equivalent: (1) S is a saturated multiplicatively closed set, (2)the comple- prime ideals and principal ideals (Theorem 5).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Questions About Boij-S\" Oderberg Theory
    QUESTIONS ABOUT BOIJ–SODERBERG¨ THEORY DANIEL ERMAN AND STEVEN V SAM 1. Background on Boij–Soderberg¨ Theory Boij–S¨oderberg theory focuses on the properties and duality relationship between two types of numerical invariants. One side involves the Betti table of a graded free resolution over the polynomial ring. The other side involves the cohomology table of a coherent sheaf on projective space. The theory began with a conjectural description of the cone of Betti tables of finite length modules, given in [10]. Those conjectures were proven in [25], which also described the cone of cohomology tables of vector bundles and illustrated a sort of duality between Betti tables and cohomology tables. The theory itself has since expanded in many directions: allowing modules whose support has higher dimension, replacing vector bundles by coherent sheaves, working over rings other than the polynomial ring, and so on. But at its core, Boij–S¨oderberg theory involves: (1) A classification, up to scalar multiple, of the possible Betti tables of some class of objects (for example, free resolutions of finitely generated modules of dimension ≤ c). (2) A classification, up to scalar multiple, of the cohomology tables of some class of objects (for examples, coherent sheaves of dimension ≤ n − c). (3) Intersection theory-style duality results between Betti tables and cohomology tables. One motivation behind Boij and S¨oderberg’s conjectures was the observation that it would yield an immediate proof of the Cohen–Macaulay version of the Multiplicity Conjectures of Herzog–Huneke–Srinivasan [44]. Eisenbud and Schreyer’s [25] thus yielded an immediate proof of that conjecture, and the subsequent papers [11, 26] provided a proof of the Mul- tiplicity Conjecture for non-Cohen–Macaulay modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Dedekind Domains
    Dedekind Domains Mathematics 601 In this note we prove several facts about Dedekind domains that we will use in the course of proving the Riemann-Roch theorem. The main theorem shows that if K=F is a finite extension and A is a Dedekind domain with quotient field F , then the integral closure of A in K is also a Dedekind domain. As we will see in the proof, we need various results from ring theory and field theory. We first recall some basic definitions and facts. A Dedekind domain is an integral domain B for which every nonzero ideal can be written uniquely as a product of prime ideals. Perhaps the main theorem about Dedekind domains is that a domain B is a Dedekind domain if and only if B is Noetherian, integrally closed, and dim(B) = 1. Without fully defining dimension, to say that a ring has dimension 1 says nothing more than nonzero prime ideals are maximal. Moreover, a Noetherian ring B is a Dedekind domain if and only if BM is a discrete valuation ring for every maximal ideal M of B. In particular, a Dedekind domain that is a local ring is a discrete valuation ring, and vice-versa. We start by mentioning two examples of Dedekind domains. Example 1. The ring of integers Z is a Dedekind domain. In fact, any principal ideal domain is a Dedekind domain since a principal ideal domain is Noetherian integrally closed, and nonzero prime ideals are maximal. Alternatively, it is easy to prove that in a principal ideal domain, every nonzero ideal factors uniquely into prime ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography [1] Emil Artin. Galois Theory. Dover, second edition, 1964. [2] Michael Artin. Algebra. Prentice Hall, first edition, 1991. [3] M. F. Atiyah and I. G. Macdonald. Introduction to Commutative Algebra. Addison Wesley, third edition, 1969. [4] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre, Chapitres 1-3.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Hermann, 1970. [5] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre, Chapitre 10.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Masson, 1980. [6] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre, Chapitres 4-7.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Masson, 1981. [7] Nicolas Bourbaki. Alg`ebre Commutative, Chapitres 8-9.El´ements de Math´ematiques. Masson, 1983. [8] Nicolas Bourbaki. Elements of Mathematics. Commutative Algebra, Chapters 1-7. Springer–Verlag, 1989. [9] Henri Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg. Homological Algebra. Princeton Math. Series, No. 19. Princeton University Press, 1956. [10] Jean Dieudonn´e. Panorama des mat´ematiques pures. Le choix bourbachique. Gauthiers-Villars, second edition, 1979. [11] David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote. Abstract Algebra. Wiley, second edition, 1999. [12] Albert Einstein. Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K¨orper. Annalen der Physik, 17:891–921, 1905. [13] David Eisenbud. Commutative Algebra With A View Toward Algebraic Geometry. GTM No. 150. Springer–Verlag, first edition, 1995. [14] Jean-Pierre Escofier. Galois Theory. GTM No. 204. Springer Verlag, first edition, 2001. [15] Peter Freyd. Abelian Categories. An Introduction to the theory of functors. Harper and Row, first edition, 1964. [16] Sergei I. Gelfand and Yuri I. Manin. Homological Algebra. Springer, first edition, 1999. [17] Sergei I. Gelfand and Yuri I. Manin. Methods of Homological Algebra. Springer, second edition, 2003. [18] Roger Godement. Topologie Alg´ebrique et Th´eorie des Faisceaux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geometry of Syzygies
    The Geometry of Syzygies A second course in Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry David Eisenbud University of California, Berkeley with the collaboration of Freddy Bonnin, Clement´ Caubel and Hel´ ene` Maugendre For a current version of this manuscript-in-progress, see www.msri.org/people/staff/de/ready.pdf Copyright David Eisenbud, 2002 ii Contents 0 Preface: Algebra and Geometry xi 0A What are syzygies? . xii 0B The Geometric Content of Syzygies . xiii 0C What does it mean to solve linear equations? . xiv 0D Experiment and Computation . xvi 0E What’s In This Book? . xvii 0F Prerequisites . xix 0G How did this book come about? . xix 0H Other Books . 1 0I Thanks . 1 0J Notation . 1 1 Free resolutions and Hilbert functions 3 1A Hilbert’s contributions . 3 1A.1 The generation of invariants . 3 1A.2 The study of syzygies . 5 1A.3 The Hilbert function becomes polynomial . 7 iii iv CONTENTS 1B Minimal free resolutions . 8 1B.1 Describing resolutions: Betti diagrams . 11 1B.2 Properties of the graded Betti numbers . 12 1B.3 The information in the Hilbert function . 13 1C Exercises . 14 2 First Examples of Free Resolutions 19 2A Monomial ideals and simplicial complexes . 19 2A.1 Syzygies of monomial ideals . 23 2A.2 Examples . 25 2A.3 Bounds on Betti numbers and proof of Hilbert’s Syzygy Theorem . 26 2B Geometry from syzygies: seven points in P3 .......... 29 2B.1 The Hilbert polynomial and function. 29 2B.2 . and other information in the resolution . 31 2C Exercises . 34 3 Points in P2 39 3A The ideal of a finite set of points .
    [Show full text]
  • The Probl\Eme Des M\'Enages Revisited
    The probl`emedes m´enages revisited Lefteris Kirousis and Georgios Kontogeorgiou Department of Mathematics National and Kapodistrian University of Athens [email protected], [email protected] August 13, 2018 Abstract We present an alternative proof to the Touchard-Kaplansky formula for the probl`emedes m´enages, which, we believe, is simpler than the extant ones and is in the spirit of the elegant original proof by Kaplansky (1943). About the latter proof, Bogart and Doyle (1986) argued that despite its cleverness, suffered from opting to give precedence to one of the genders for the couples involved (Bogart and Doyle supplied an elegant proof that avoided such gender-dependent bias). The probl`emedes m´enages (the couples problem) asks to count the number of ways that n man-woman couples can sit around a circular table so that no one sits next to her partner or someone of the same gender. The problem was first stated in an equivalent but different form by Tait [11, p. 159] in the framework of knot theory: \How many arrangements are there of n letters, when A cannot be in the first or second place, B not in the second or third, &c." It is easy to see that the m´enageproblem is equivalent to Tait's arrangement problem: first sit around the table, in 2n! ways, the men or alternatively the women, leaving an empty space between any two consecutive of them, then count the number of ways to sit the members of the other gender. Recurrence relations that compute the answer to Tait's question were soon given by Cayley and Muir [2,9,3, 10].
    [Show full text]
  • Factorization in Integral Domains, II
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 152,78-93 (1992) Factorization in Integral Domains, II D. D. ANDERSON Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 DAVID F. ANDERSON* Department of Mathematics, The Unioersity of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 AND MUHAMMAD ZAFRULLAH Department of Mathematics, Winthrop College, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29733 Communicated by Richard G. Swan Received June 8. 1990 In this paper, we study several factorization properties in an integral domain which are weaker than unique factorization. We study how these properties behave under localization and directed unions. 0 1992 Academic Press, Inc. In this paper, we continue our investigation begun in [l] of various factorization properties in an integral domain which are weaker than unique factorization. Section 1 introduces material on inert extensions and splitting multiplicative sets. In Section 2, we study how these factorization properties behave under localization. Special attention is paid to multi- plicative sets generated by primes. Section 3 consists of “Nagata-type” theorems about these properties. That is, if the localization of a domain at a multiplicative set generated by primes satisfies a certain ring-theoretic property, does the domain satisfy that property? In the fourth section, we consider Nagata-type theorems for root closure, seminormality, integral * Supported in part by a National Security Agency Grant. 78 OO21-8693/92$5.00 Copyright 0 1992 by Academic Press, Inc. All righrs of reproduction in any form reserved. FACTORIZATION IN INTEGRAL DOMAINS, II 79 closure: and complete integral closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1601.07660V1 [Math.AC] 28 Jan 2016 2].Tesemigroup the [26])
    INTEGRAL DOMAINS WITH BOOLEAN t-CLASS SEMIGROUP S. KABBAJ AND A. MIMOUNI Abstract. The t-class semigroup of an integral domain is the semigroup of the isomorphy classes of the t-ideals with the operation induced by t- multiplication. This paper investigates integral domains with Boolean t-class semigroup with an emphasis on the GCD and stability conditions. The main results establish t-analogues for well-known results on Pr¨ufer domains and B´ezout domains of finite character. 1. Introduction All rings considered in this paper are integral domains (i.e., commutative with identity and without zero-divisors). The class semigroup of a domain R, denoted S(R), is the semigroup of nonzero fractional ideals modulo its subsemigroup of nonzero principal ideals [11, 41]. The t-class semigroup of R, denoted St(R), is the semigroup of fractional t-ideals modulo its subsemigroup of nonzero principal ideals, that is, the semigroup of the isomorphy classes of the t-ideals of R with the operation induced by ideal t-multiplication. Notice that St(R) is the t-analogue of S(R), as the class group Cl(R) is the t-analogue of the Picard group Pic(R). The following set-theoretic inclusions always hold: Pic(R) ⊆ Cl(R) ⊆ St(R) ⊆ S(R). Note that the first and third inclusions turn into equality for Pr¨ufer domains and the second does so for Krull domains. More details on these objects are provided in the next section. Divisibility properties of a domain R are often reflected in group or semigroup- theoretic properties of Cl(R) or S(R).
    [Show full text]
  • Right Ideals of a Ring and Sublanguages of Science
    RIGHT IDEALS OF A RING AND SUBLANGUAGES OF SCIENCE Javier Arias Navarro Ph.D. In General Linguistics and Spanish Language http://www.javierarias.info/ Abstract Among Zellig Harris’s numerous contributions to linguistics his theory of the sublanguages of science probably ranks among the most underrated. However, not only has this theory led to some exhaustive and meaningful applications in the study of the grammar of immunology language and its changes over time, but it also illustrates the nature of mathematical relations between chunks or subsets of a grammar and the language as a whole. This becomes most clear when dealing with the connection between metalanguage and language, as well as when reflecting on operators. This paper tries to justify the claim that the sublanguages of science stand in a particular algebraic relation to the rest of the language they are embedded in, namely, that of right ideals in a ring. Keywords: Zellig Sabbetai Harris, Information Structure of Language, Sublanguages of Science, Ideal Numbers, Ernst Kummer, Ideals, Richard Dedekind, Ring Theory, Right Ideals, Emmy Noether, Order Theory, Marshall Harvey Stone. §1. Preliminary Word In recent work (Arias 2015)1 a line of research has been outlined in which the basic tenets underpinning the algebraic treatment of language are explored. The claim was there made that the concept of ideal in a ring could account for the structure of so- called sublanguages of science in a very precise way. The present text is based on that work, by exploring in some detail the consequences of such statement. §2. Introduction Zellig Harris (1909-1992) contributions to the field of linguistics were manifold and in many respects of utmost significance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Mathematics in America, Peter Duren Et Ai., (Eds.), Vol
    Garrett Birkhoff has had a lifelong connection with Harvard mathematics. He was an infant when his father, the famous mathematician G. D. Birkhoff, joined the Harvard faculty. He has had a long academic career at Harvard: A.B. in 1932, Society of Fellows in 1933-1936, and a faculty appointmentfrom 1936 until his retirement in 1981. His research has ranged widely through alge­ bra, lattice theory, hydrodynamics, differential equations, scientific computing, and history of mathematics. Among his many publications are books on lattice theory and hydrodynamics, and the pioneering textbook A Survey of Modern Algebra, written jointly with S. Mac Lane. He has served as president ofSIAM and is a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Mathematics at Harvard, 1836-1944 GARRETT BIRKHOFF O. OUTLINE As my contribution to the history of mathematics in America, I decided to write a connected account of mathematical activity at Harvard from 1836 (Harvard's bicentennial) to the present day. During that time, many mathe­ maticians at Harvard have tried to respond constructively to the challenges and opportunities confronting them in a rapidly changing world. This essay reviews what might be called the indigenous period, lasting through World War II, during which most members of the Harvard mathe­ matical faculty had also studied there. Indeed, as will be explained in §§ 1-3 below, mathematical activity at Harvard was dominated by Benjamin Peirce and his students in the first half of this period. Then, from 1890 until around 1920, while our country was becoming a great power economically, basic mathematical research of high quality, mostly in traditional areas of analysis and theoretical celestial mechanics, was carried on by several faculty members.
    [Show full text]
  • Irving Kaplansky
    Portraying and remembering Irving Kaplansky Hyman Bass University of Michigan Mathematical Sciences Research Institute • February 23, 2007 1 Irving (“Kap”) Kaplansky “infinitely algebraic” “I liked the algebraic way of looking at things. I’m additionally fascinated when the algebraic method is applied to infinite objects.” 1917 - 2006 A Gallery of Portraits 2 Family portrait: Kap as son • Born 22 March, 1917 in Toronto, (youngest of 4 children) shortly after his parents emigrated to Canada from Poland. • Father Samuel: Studied to be a rabbi in Poland; worked as a tailor in Toronto. • Mother Anna: Little schooling, but enterprising: “Health Bread Bakeries” supported (& employed) the whole family 3 Kap’s father’s grandfather Kap’s father’s parents Kap (age 4) with family 4 Family Portrait: Kap as father • 1951: Married Chellie Brenner, a grad student at Harvard Warm hearted, ebullient, outwardly emotional (unlike Kap) • Three children: Steven, Alex, Lucy "He taught me and my brothers a lot, (including) what is really the most important lesson: to do the thing you love and not worry about making money." • Died 25 June, 2006, at Steven’s home in Sherman Oaks, CA Eight months before his death he was still doing mathematics. Steven asked, -“What are you working on, Dad?” -“It would take too long to explain.” 5 Kap & Chellie marry 1951 Family portrait, 1972 Alex Steven Lucy Kap Chellie 6 Kap – The perfect accompanist “At age 4, I was taken to a Yiddish musical, Die Goldene Kala. It was a revelation to me that there could be this kind of entertainment with music.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood of 0 (The Neighborhood Depending on N), (2) Fng - F,Jg -O 0 As N Co,Foranyginl,(R)
    VOL. 35, 1949 MA THEMA TICS: I. KAPLANSK Y 133 PRIMARY IDEALS IN GROUP ALGEBRAS* BY IRVING KAPLANSKY INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY Communicated by M. H. Stone, January 29, 1949 Let G be a locally compact abelian group and A its Li-algebra, that is, the algebra of all complex functions summable with respect to Haar measure, with convolution as multiplication. Let I be a closed ideal in A. A question stemming from Wiener's Tauberian investigations is the following: is I the intersection of the regular maximal ideals containing it? L. Schwartz1 has recently published a counter-example. This nega- tive result increases the interest in special cases where the answer is affirma- tive. Ditkin,2 Beurling3 and Segal4 have obtained an affirmative answer in the following case: I is a primary ideal (that is, it is contained in exactly one regular maximal ideal), and G is the group of real numbers or the group of integers. The purpose of this note is to extend this result to any locally compact abelian group. This will be accomplished by the methods of Segal, together with the structure theorems for groups. The essential idea is that the discrete case can be treated "elementwise," and thus reduced to the case of a cyclic group. THEOREM 1. In the Li-algebra of a localiy compact- abelian group, any closed primary ideal is maximal. In the proof we shall use the following lemma, which is a slight extension of Lemma 2.7.1 in S. LEMMA 1. Let R be the direct sum of a finite number of groups, each of which is the group of real numbers or of integers.
    [Show full text]