Air Resource Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Air Resource Management Plan AIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Prepared By: Laura Hudnell, Meg Lindsey, Tamara Franklin Blett, and John McCarthy (1988-93) Updated and Revised By: Andria Holland-Sears (1998) Approval ___________________________________ Date______________ Forest Supervisor, White River NF Executive Summary The goals of this plan are to coordinate and provide guidance for protection of air quality and air quality related values in the management of the White River National Forest (WRNF). It includes a monitoring program, which is intended to assess current resource conditions, de- termine potential impacts to those resources, and coordinate monitoring being conducted by various entities. The plan is divided into six primary sections. Section I - This section is intended to summarize the legal basis and responsibilities for pro- tection of air quality on the WRNF. It includes summaries of applicable sections of both the Federal Clean Air Act and the Colorado Air Quality Control Act. Forest Service policy re- lated to management of the air resource in the National Forests is also summarized and refer- enced. Section II - This section addresses the Forest’s three Class I Air Quality Areas: the Flat Tops, Eagles Nest, and Maroon Bells/Snowmass Wildernesses. Included in this section are descriptions of the resources of each wilderness, existing and potential air quality impacts, and identification of the Air Quality Related Values (AQRV’s). Sensitive receptors which represent the air quality values are identified for each Class I Area. A review of existing in- formation and a monitoring strategy is included for each of the AQRV’s in each area. In- terim "Limits of Acceptable Change" in Sensitive Receptors are identified. Section III - This part of the plan addresses the remainder of the Forest, both wilderness and non-wilderness, which is classified as a Class II air quality area. The wilderness part of this section includes applicable Forest Service policy, descriptions of the Class II wildernesses, air quality related values, potential impacts, and monitoring needs. The non-wilderness por- tion discusses smoke sensitive areas, non-attainment areas, wildfire management, prescribed burning, gravel pits, roads, and other permitted National Forest uses. Section IV - This is a description of existing databases and procedures for storage and re- trieval of the data collected through the air resource monitoring program. Future needs and improvements are also discussed. Section V - Describes the roles of the various agencies and entities involved in air resource monitoring on the White River NF. Identifies opportunities and needs for future cooperation and coordination. Section VI - This section includes a budget summary/action plan, training needs for Forest personnel, and quality control procedures and requirements. It should be noted that preparation of this plan began in 1988 and has been updated in 1998. During the intervening time period, there have been numerous changes and developments, which influence air resource management on the WRNF and other National Forests. These changes will continue and will dictate future revisions and updates in this plan. WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST AIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Plan Outline (Revised September 21, 1993) (Revised February, 1998) Page I. Introduction I-1 A. Applicable Air Quality Laws and Regulations I-1 1. Federal Clean Air Act I-1 2. Colorado State Clean Air Act I-4 B. Forest Service National and Regional Air Resource I-8 Management Policy C. White River National Forest Land and Resource I-9 Management Plan (Forest Plan) Direction Specific Management Objectives: 1. Federal Air Quality Standards I-11 2. State Air Quality Standards I-12 3. PSD Increments I-12 II. Class I Air Quality Areas A. Descriptions - Class I Air Quality Areas II-1 1. Flat Tops Wilderness II-1 2. Maroon Bells - Snowmass Wilderness II-4 3. Eagles Nest Wilderness II-7 B. Existing and Potential Impacts II-10 Page C. Air Quality Related Values and Sensitive Receptors II-22 D. Monitoring of Air Quality Related Values II-25 1. Flora II-25 2. Fauna II-30 3. Water II-32 4. Visibility II-34 5. Soils II-38 6. Atmospheric Deposition & Ambient Air Quality II-40 7. Snowpack Chemistry & Snow Melt II-42 8. Meteorology II-43 E. Limits of Acceptable Change II-47 III. Class II Air Quality Areas - Wilderness and Non-Wilderness A. Wilderness - Class II Air Quality Areas III-1 1. Forest Service Policy III-1 2. Descriptions and Air Quality Related Values III-2 3. Potential Impacts and Monitoring Needs III-3 B. Non-Wilderness Areas III-6 1. Smoke Sensitive and Non-Attainment Areas III-6 2. Wildfire Management and Prescribed Burning III-9 3. Gravel Pits and Roads III-11 4. Other Permitted National Forest Uses III-12 Page IV. Air Resource Data Management IV-1 V. Coordination V-1 Description of the roles of other agencies and cooperators. VI. Work Load Analysis, Budgeting, VI-1 Training & Quality Control A. Budgeting VI-1 B. Training Needs VI-3 C. Quality Control VI-4 References Ref-1 Appendices A - Fish Stocked Wilderness Lake and Streams A-1 B - Pollution Sensitive Lichen B-1 C - EPA Western Lakes Survey C-1 Wilderness Lake Monitoring Data and Graphs D - Long Term Lake Sampling Protocols D-1 E - Visibility Monitoring Protocols E-1 Visibility Monitoring Data F - NADP Network Locations in Colorado F-1 NADP Data for Four Mile and Sunlight Peak Sites TABLES Page ..... Table 1.. Air Quality Related Values I-10 ..... Table 2.. Federal NAAQ Standards I-11 ..... Table 3.. PSD Increments I-12 ..... Table 4.. Annual Emissions - Existing Major Sources II-15 ..... Table 5.. Annual Emissions - Smaller Sources/County II-16 ..... Table 6.. Proposed Oil Shale Developments - Colorado II-20 ... and Utah ..... Table 7.. Location of RAWS sites in WRNF area II-45 ..... Table 8.. SNOTEL Sites on WRNF II-46 ..... Table 9.. NRCS Snow Course Sites on WRNF II-46 ..... Table 10 PM10 Exceedances for Aspen and III-8 ..... .............. Steamboat Springs ..... Table 11 Key to Pollutant Sources III-13 ..... Table 12 WRNF Air Resource Management Action Plan VI-2 ..... Table 13 Precision, Accuracy & Completeness for VI-7 Water Chemistry Parameters ..... ..... Table 14 Reporting Units & Detection Limits for VI-8 Water Chemistry ..... Table 15 Maximum Control Limits for Quality Control VI-9 Samples ..... Table 16 Preservation Method & Holding Time for VI-10 Water Sample Parameters FIGURES & EXHIBITS Page ..... Figure 1A - 1D Winds Aloft - Grand Junction, CO. II-11 ..... Figure 2 ... Location of Proposed Oil Shale II-19 . Developments - Colorado & Utah ..... Figure 3 ... Flow Diagram of Air Resource Monitoring VI-6 Organization - WRNF ..... Exhibit 1 ... Map of Flat Tops Wilderness II-2 ..... Exhibit 2 ... Map of Maroon Bells/Snowmass Wilderness II-6 ..... Exhibit 3 ... Map of Eagles Nest Wilderness II-8 ..... Exhibit 4 ... Map of Wilderness Areas on the WRNF - III-5 Class I & II Air Quality Areas ..... Exhibit 5 ... Map of Smoke Sensitive Areas - WRNF III-8 WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST AIR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN I. INTRODUCTION Known for its skiing, scenery, wildlife, and wilderness, the White River National Forest (WRNF) provides quality recreation experiences for visitors from around the world. Along with visibility, a variety of ecosystems in the WRNF have the potential to be affected by human-caused air pollution. The purposes of this management plan are to assess current resource conditions, to determine poten- tial impacts to these resources from man-caused pollution sources, and to coordinate and provide guidance to air resource management activities on the WRNF in accordance with the following laws,regulations, policies, and direction. A. Applicable Air Quality Laws and Regulations 1. Federal Clean Air Act Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1960 with major amendments to the Act in 1967, 1970, 1977, and 1990. The purpose of the Act is to enhance the quality of the nation’s air resources and to pro- tect public health and welfare. The Act established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and gave the states primary responsibility for air quality management. States carry out this responsibility through a State Imple- mentation Plan (SIP), which is developed at the state level. How states achieve and maintain ap- plicable federal and state standards is described in the State Implementation Plan. Table 2, page I-11 lists the current NAAQS that apply both federally and throughout the state of Colorado. Several sections of the Act directly affect management of the National Forests: Section 109 - National Ambient Air Quality Standards - NAAQS have been established for particu- late matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, carbon monoxide, and lead. There are primary NAAQS established to protect human health and secondary NAAQS to protect welfare. The stan- dards are expressed in terms of different averaging times, e.g., annual, 24-hour, and 3-hour. "Non-attainment areas" are those geographical areas within the state that have air pollutant levels in excess of the NAAQS. If an area is not in attainment of an NAAQS, then a State Implementation Plan must be developed to attain the standard by a certain date by controlling the pollutant emissions from the responsible sources. Periodic review and revision of the NAAQS is required by the Clean Air Act. States must revise their State Implementation Plans to demonstrate attainment of new standards as they are developed. Section 116 - A state may adopt and enforce standards and regulations, which are more stringent than those required by the Clean Air Act (but never less stringent). Section 118 - In general, any State Implementation Plan applies to any federal facility emitting air pollution to the same extent that it applies to a non-governmental entity. Section 176(c) - A federal agency must not engage in, support in any way, license, or approve any activity, which does not meet all applicable requirements of the State Implementation Plan.
Recommended publications
  • MOUNT SOPRIS 12,965 Feet
    Aspen Ranger District 806 West Hallam Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-3445 (970) 925-5277- Fax United States Department of Agriculture MOUNT SOPRIS 12,965 feet LENGTH: 6 miles from Dinkle Lake ELEVATION GAIN: 4,253 feet AVERAGE HIKING/CLIMBING TIME: USGS MAP(S): Sopris 10 hours RECOMMENDED SEASON(S): SKILL FACTOR: More difficult Late spring and summer ATTRACTIONS/CONSIDERATIONS: If you plan to climb Sopris, allow two days. The first day, hike to the lakes, set up camp in a designated site and explore, fish or just enjoy the scenery. On the second day, get up early and begin climbing to finish the hike before the aftenoon thunderstorms. ACCESS: Procees south on Hwy 133 for 1.4 miles to Prince Creek Road and take a left. The trailhead is approximately 8 miles up the road and just before the Dinkle Lake at the Thomas Lake Trailhead. The first three miles to Thomas Lakes is easy. NARRATIVE: The easiest route is up the east ridge. From the upper lake, walk to the base of the steep slope to the southeast of the lake. Ascend this slope on the new hiking trail to the ridge, and continue across the high, sparsely timbered slope to the southern ridge. Follow this ridge up the mountain. You will come upon one stretch of fairy steep, loose rock but should have no problem if you use care. Soon you will be on the main ridge to the summit. Enjoy your view! You may want to cross one half mile saddle to West Sopris, which is the same elevation as East Sopris, and offers a superb view of the Crystal River Valley and Avalanche Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A20 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM April 2020 by David Evans and Associates
    APPENDIX A20 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation APPENDIX A20 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM April 2020 By David Evans and Associates INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The I-70 West Vail Pass Auxiliary Lanes project is located in Eagle and Summit Counties, with the eastern terminus just east of the Vail Pass Rest Area and the western terminus in the Town of Vail. The project study limits include eastbound (EB) and westbound (WB) I-70 from mile post (MP) 179.5 to MP 191.5. The project location and approximate study area are shown in Figure 1 . As part of the initial National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis, a Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the I-70 Mountain Corridor (C-470 to Glenwood Springs) was completed in 2011. This EIS, the I-70 Mountain Corridor Programmatic Final Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), recommended the addition of auxiliary lanes EB and WB on the west side of Vail Pass from MP 180 to MP 190 as part of the Preferred Alternative’s Minimum Program of Improvements. The PEIS also identified the potential for an elevated Advanced Guideway System (AGS) for transit along the I-70 corridor, including the West Vail Pass project corridor. A follow-up AGS Feasibility Study in 2014 analyzed potential alignments and costs for an AGS system and determined there were three feasible alignments for future AGS. While AGS is not part of the West Vail Pass Auxiliary Lanes project, the AGS Feasibility Study was used to ensure the project did not preclude the favored alignment of the three, which would be partially within CDOT right-of-way (ROW).
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal River and Wast Sopris Creek Report Section 7
    7. References Bredehoeft, J.D. 2006. On Modeling Philosophies. Ground Water, Vol. 44 (4), pp. 496-499. Bryant, B. and P.L. Martin. 1988. The Geologic Story of the Aspen Region -Mines, Glaciers and Rocks. Bulletin 1603. U.S. Geological Survey. CDNR. 2008. Guide to Colorado Water Rights, Well Permits, and Administration. Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources, Office of State Engineer. (http://www.water.state.co.us/pubs/wellpermitguide.pdf ). Daly, C. and G.L. Johnson. 1999. PRISM Spatial Climate Layers; PRISM Guide Book. PRISM Group, Oregon State University. Devlin, J.F., and M. Sophocleous. 2005. The Persistence of the Water Budget Myth and its Relationship to Sustainability. Hydrogeology Journal, Vol. 13(4), pp. 549-554. ESRI. 2002. Getting Started with ArcGISTM . ESRI, Redlands, California. Freethey, G.W., and G.E. Gordy. 1991. Geohydrology of Mesozoic Rocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, Excluding the San Juan Basin. Professional Paper 1411-C. U.S. Geological Survey. Geldon, A.L. 2003a. Geology of Paleozoic Rocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, Excluding the San Juan Basin. Professional Paper 1411-A. U.S. Geological Survey. Geldon, A.L. 2003b. Hydrologic Properties and Ground-Water Flow Systems of the Paleozoic Rocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, Excluding the San Juan Basin. Professional Paper 1411-B. U.S. Geological Survey. Harlan, R., K.E. Kolm, and E.D. Gutentag. 1989. Water Well Design and Construction. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • BACKCOUNTRY CACHE a Newsletter for Members of CMC Backpacking Section
    BACKCOUNTRY CACHE A Newsletter for Members of CMC Backpacking Section May 2021 CHAIR'S CORNER - Uwe Sartori Members often ask what do trip leaders do in getting a trip built and across the finish line? Tied into the answer is the awesome value CMC members receive each time they sign up and do a CMC trip. (Think about it. If you go to a guide service, you are likely paying hundreds of dollars a day.) The chart below shows my investment for an upcoming backpacking trip. This personal investment is repeated by many of our trip leaders regardless of the recreational activity. For this 2 day backpacking trip, there are 24 hours of prep/debrief/admin work and 20 hours of trip activity time; 44 hours total. You can begin to understand why the BPX Section is super keen on having our members keep their commitment and help us AVOID ROSTER CHURN. Having trips cancel due to CMC members dropping out is the bane of trip leaders. Show respect and community by keeping your commitment when signing up for a CMC adventure. I guarantee you will not regret it. BPX TRIPS FOR NEXT 2 MONTHS E=Easy M=Moderate D=Difficult June - July Trips With Openings* Jun 1-3 Tue-Thu M Camping, Hiking, Fishing at Browns Canyon Nat'l Monument Jun 9-11 Wed-Fri E Mayflower and Mohawk Lakes, White River NF Jun 11-13 Fri-Sun M Just-in-Time Wigwam Park, Lost Creek Wilderness Jun 25-28 Fri-Mon D Colorado Trail - Collegiate West Exploratory Jun 29- Tue-Thu D Willow and Salmon Lakes, Eagles Nest Wilderness Jul 1 Jul 1-2 Thu-Fri D Macey Lakes and Colony Baldy, Sangre de Cristo Wilderness
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Hanging Lake
    Evaluation of Hanging Lake Garfield County, Colorado for its Merit in Meeting National Significance Criteria as a National Natural Landmark in Representing Lakes, Ponds and Wetlands in the Southern Rocky Mountain Province prepared by Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program 1474 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 August 27, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2 LISTS OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 5 Source of Site Proposal ................................................................................................... 5 Evaluator(s) ..................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 5 PNNL SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 5 Brief Overview ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 SSSA Program
    Latinos and the Change of a Nation: Implications for the Social Sciences 95th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Social Science Association April 8 – 11, 2015 Grand Hyatt, Denver Denver, Colorado 1 SSSA Events Time Location Wednesday April 8 Registration & Exhibits 2:00 - 5:00 p.m. Imperial Ballroom SSSA Executive Committee 3:00 - 5:00 p.m. Mount Harvard Nominations Committee Meeting 1 4:00 – 5:30 pm Mount Yale Thursday April 9 Registration & Exhibits 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Imperial Ballroom Nominations Committee 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Mount Harvard Membership Committee 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Mount Yale Budget and Financial Policies Committee 8:30 - 9:45 a.m. Mount Oxford Resolutions Committee 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Mount Harvard Editorial Policies Committee 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Mount Oxford Site Policy Committee 10:00 - 11:15 a.m. Mount Yale SSSA Council 1:00 - 3:45 p.m. Mount Oxford SSSA Presidential Address 4:00 - 5:15 p.m. Mount Sopris B SSSA Presidential Reception 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. Mount Evans Friday April 10 Registration & Exhibits 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Imperial Ballroom SSSA Student Social & Welcome Continental 7:15 – 8:45 a.m. Grand Ballroom Breakfast (FOR REGISTERED STUDENTS ONLY, No Guests or Faculty/Professional Members) SSSA General Business Meeting 1:00 - 2:15 p.m. Grand Ballroom Saturday April 11 Registration 8:00 – 11:00 am Imperial Ballroom 2016 Program Committee 7:15 - 8:30 a.m. Pike’s Peak Getting to Know SSSA 8:30 – 9:15 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesa Cortina / South Willow Falls
    U. S. Department of Agriculture Dillon Ranger District 680 Blue River Parkway Silverthorne, CO 80498 (970) 468-5400 MESA CORTINA / SOUTH WILLOW FALLS - FDT 32 / 60 Difficulty: EASY TO MODERATE Trail Use: Moderate Length: 2.7 miles one-way to the Gore Range Trail (FDT 60) 4.2 miles one-way to the South Willow Falls Elevation: Start at 9,217 feet and ends at 10,007 feet (highest point 10,007 feet) Elevation Gain: +1,043 feet - 253 feet = +790 feet Open To: HIKING, HORSE, X-C SKIING, SNOWSHOEING Access: From I-70 take Exit 205, Silverthorne / Dillon, and travel north on HWY 9 to the first traffic light at the intersection of Rainbow Drive / Wildernest Road. Turn left onto Wildernest Road / Ryan Gulch Rd. Continue through two stoplights onto Buffalo Mountain Drive. After 0.8 miles, turn right onto Lakeview Drive. Travel 0.45 miles and turn left onto Aspen Drive. The Mesa Cortina trailhead and parking area will be on your right in 0.15 miles. Trail Highlights: This trail enters the Eagles Nest Wilderness Area. There are great views of Dillon Reservoir and the entire Blue River Valley from the trailhead. The trail winds through aspen groves into a meadow which offers a good view of the Ptarmigan Peak Wilderness. After the meadow is the Eagles Nest Wilderness boundary. The trail then travels through lodgepole pine forests and crosses South Willow Creek just before intersecting the Gore Range Trail (FDT 60). Continue left (west) on the Gore Range Trail toward South Willow Falls. Eventually you will come to a junction which is the dead-end spur trail to the falls.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 ON THE COVER Rocky Mountain National Park Photograph by: Billy Schweiger A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 David M. Theobald1,2 Jill S. Baron2,3 Peter Newman1 Barry Noon4 John B. Norman III1,2 Ian Leinwand1 Sophia E. Linn1 Richard Sherer4 Katherine E. Williams2,5 Melannie Hartman2 1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 2Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499 3U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO 80523 4Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1474 5Current address: Department of Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 This report was prepared under Task Order J2380060103 (Cooperative Agreement #H1200040001) July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail
    CONTINENTAL DIVIDE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DAY & OVERNIGHT HIKES: COLORADO CONTINENTAL DIVIDE TRAIL COALITION VISIT COLORADO! Day & Overnight Hikes on the Continental Divide Trail THE CENTENNIAL STATE The Colorado Rockies are the quintessential CDT experience! The CDT traverses 800 miles of these majestic and challenging peaks dotted with abandoned homesteads and ghost towns, and crosses the ancestral lands of the Ute, Eastern Shoshone, and Cheyenne peoples. The CDT winds through some of Colorado’s most incredible landscapes: the spectacular alpine tundra of the South San Juan, Weminuche, and La Garita Wildernesses where the CDT remains at or above 11,000 feet for nearly 70 miles; remnants of the late 1800’s ghost town of Hancock that served the Alpine Tunnel; the awe-inspiring Collegiate Peaks near Leadville, the highest incorporated city in America; geologic oddities like The Window, Knife Edge, and Devil’s Thumb; the towering 14,270 foot Grays Peak – the highest point on the CDT; Rocky Mountain National Park with its rugged snow-capped skyline; the remote Never Summer Wilderness; and the broad valleys and numerous glacial lakes and cirques of the Mount Zirkel Wilderness. You might also encounter moose, mountain goats, bighorn sheep, marmots, and pika on the CDT in Colorado. In this guide, you’ll find Colorado’s best day and overnight hikes on the CDT, organized south to north. ELEVATION: The average elevation of the CDT in Colorado is 10,978 ft, and all of the hikes listed in this guide begin at elevations above 8,000 ft. Remember to bring plenty of water, sun protection, and extra food, and know that a hike at elevation will likely be more challenging than the same distance hike at sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 94-352 94Th Congress an Act
    90 STAT. 870 PUBLIC LAW 94-352—JULY 12, 1976 Public Law 94-352 94th Congress An Act July 12, 1976 To designate the Eagles Nest Wilderness, Arapaho and Wliite River National [S. 268] Forests, in the State of Colorado. Be it enacted ty the Senate and House of Representatives of the Eagles Nest United States of ATuerica in Congress assenibled^ That, in accordance Wilderness, Colo. with subsection 3(b) of the Wilderness Act (78 Stat. 891; 16 U.S.C. Designation. 1132(b)), the area classified as the Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive 16 use 1132 Area, with the proposed additions thereto and deletions therefrom, as note. generally depicted on a map entitled "Eagles Nest Wilderness—Pro­ posed", dated June 1976, which is on file and available for public inspection in the office of the Chief, Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, is hereby designated as the "Eagles Nest Wilderness" within and as part of the Arapaho and White River National Forests comprising an area of approximately one hundred thirty-three thou­ sand nine hundred ten acres. Map and SEC. 2. As soon as practicable after this Act takes effect, the Secre­ description, filing tary of Agriculture shall file a map and a legal description of the with Eagles Nest Wilderness with the Committees on Interior and Insular congressional Affairs of the United States Senate and House of Representatives, and committees. such map and description shall have the same force and effect as if 16 use 1132 included in this Act: Provided^ hoicever, That correction of clerical note. and typographical errors in such map and description may be made.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]