DOCSLIB.ORG

Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT ­ AGE of AUTISM Tics & Toxins Series Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT ­ AGE of AUTISM Tics & Toxins Series Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT 2/8/2016 Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT ­ AGE OF AUTISM Tics & Toxins Series Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT By Dan Olmsted Now that my Age of Autism colleague J.B. Handley has demonstrated the role of Wyeth in funding Every Child By Two (HERE) ­­ the vaccine initiative that Rosalynn Carter, Paul Offit and Amanda Peet boosted a week ago ­­ I think it's time to share a piece of paper someone slipped me a while back. It looks innocuous enough ­­ an inter­office memorandum from 1979 (Click HERE for the pdf)* about distribution of Wyeth's DPT vaccine. But read closely ­­ a series of SIDS deaths in Tennessee is prompting Wyeth officials to make sure that vials from a single lot don't get distributed to a single state, county or health department. The memo says "senior management staff" gave the OK to proceed with the plan. I am going to refrain from interpreting this document ­­ although, if there is an interpretation besides the obvious one that Wyeth didn't want correlations being drawn between DPT vaccine lot numbers and SIDS deaths, I can't think of it right now. And sure, it can be argued this is ancient history ­­ the vaccine has been changed, what happened in 1979 does not necessarily reflect what's happening today in the debate over adverse events following vaccination, and so on. Except ... Click on the photo to bring up a full­sized pop up window. You can change the percent view in the lower right hand corner to see the entire doc. The PDF file has the full doc, fully legible as well. ...except there is an analogy here that goes way beyond the memo. Barbara Loe Fisher and Harris Coulter lay it all out in "A Shot in the Dark," subtitled "Why the P in the DPT vaccination may be hazardous to your child's health." Barbara is regularly portrayed in the media as an anti­vaccine zealot, but the book's discussion of what happened in Tennessee is pretty convincing. (And she was instrumental in getting a safer version of the vaccine onto the market.) From the book: "When statistics are applied to the study of vaccines, political immunology demonstrates its infinite flexibility: statistical http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/08/by­dan­olmsted.html 2/8 2/8/2016 Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT ­ AGE OF AUTISM evidence demonstrating cause and effect is denied, when this same evidence, applied to any other branch of medicine, would be accepted without question," Coulter and Fisher write. "This convenient method of reasoning was displayed with particular clarity in connection with the government's investigation of SIDS deaths in Tennessee. In 1978­79, eleven babies were found to have died within eight days of a DPT vaccination. Nine of the eleven had been vaccinated with the same lot of pertussis vaccine, Wyeth #64201 and five (four from the same lot) had died within twenty­four hours of vaccination. "A statistical analysis of the clustering of deaths revealed that the likelihood of observing four or more deaths occurring randomly on any of the first eight days after the use of lot #64201 was 3 in 100. ... E.B. Mortimer later reported that the probability of this being a chance association was even lower ­­ between 2 and 5 in 1,000. "The statistical evidence in favor of a connection between the deaths and the DPT shot was strong. Would the medical authorities bite the bullet and admit the vaccine was related to the deaths? Absolutely not." It's a long and unpleasant tale, but when all was said and done, "the tombstone was placed on what happened in Tennessee three years later, in the September 1982 issue of the Journal of Pediatrics, when Bernier and his colleagues at the CDC wrote their epitaph on the infant deaths. ... They ... made this amazing statement: 'Whether or not this temporal association reflects a causal relationship remains undetermined; we found no evidence to support such a causal association.'" Fisher and Coulter mention the Wyeth memo, saying the company "apparently also decided to act to prevent a clustering of deaths following DPT vaccination from a single lot from ever occurring again in a single geographical area." They don't reproduce the actual memo; as far as I know, this is the first time it has been published. (And no, neither Fisher nor Coulter was my source.) It packs quite a wallop, doesn't it? Since these are described as "Interim Measures In Affect" (sic!), and include a "Permanent Policy Proposal" to put into effect (sick!), wouldn't it be interesting to know how they distribute lots these days? Is this the kind of approach that Rosalynn Carter and Amanda Peet (I'll leave Paul Offit out of this) want to be hooked up with? Might they consider asking their benefactors for an explanation, since as far as I know none has been forthcoming although the memo's existence has been known for a couple of decades, at the least? Do the drug companies, the HMOs, the AAP and the CDC really have a track record of tracking down every report of side effects, encouraging the public to make use of the VAERS system and vigilantly monitoring the VSD database? Are they the ones we want to trust to tell us whether there is any "causal association" between vaccines and SIDS, or autism, or asthma, or ADD? I vote no. I also can't help pointing out that A Shot in the Dark was first published in 1985, just before the modern Age of Autism began. Too bad no one in a position to do anything about it took seriously the deep and disturbing implications of this incident ­­ and the continuing power of "political epidemiology" to bury its mistakes in unmarked graves. ­­ Dan Olmsted is Editor of Age of Autism. * Thanks to Ginger Taylor of Adventures In Autism for help in turning a 29 year old piece of paper into files. Posted by Age of Autism at August 12, 2008 at 6:57 AM in Dan Olmsted , Vaccine Safety | Permalink | Comments (27) | TrackBack (0) Tweet Like 597 TrackBack TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8357f3f2969e200e553dde29c8833 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Olmsted on Autism: 1979 Wyeth Memo on DPT: Comments http://www.ageofautism.com/2008/08/by­dan­olmsted.html 3/8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Risk/Reward View of Vaccines
    A Risk/Reward View of Vaccines Addressing the confusion and presenting a different approach to the vaccine question as it relates to the frum community For those interested in minimizing the growing Machlokes Ver. 11/14//2019 (latest version at www.rodefshalom613.org) email [email protected] or leave a message at (414) 751-0001 with any corrections DRAFT Table of Contents Page Time to Read Introduction 4-9 5 Min. Main Presentation 10-41 15 min Critical Update as of 4/9/19 40 Appendix A - Wakefield: Defended/Exonerated 42 Appendix B - Scientists and Doctors on Vaccine Harm 43-44 Appendix C - Literature about Vaccine Harm 45-46 Appendix C1 - Vaccines and SIDS 47-48 Appendix C2 - Vaccines, Autism, and Under 5 Mortality 49 Appendix D - Ingredients in Vaccines 50 Appendix D1 - The Difference Between Vaccines and Chemical Drugs 51 Appendix D2 - Some Biologic (Vaccine) Recalls 52-54 Appendix E - What about Herd Immunity? 55-56 Appendix F - But They Can't All Be Wrong - Can They? 57 Appendix G - Is the CDC Lying? 58-59 Appendix H - How Profitable is the Vaccine Industry? 60-62 Appendix H1 - Conflicts of Interest in the Vaccine Industry 63 Appendix I - Dr. Paul Offit on Metziza B'peh and Bris Milah 64-65 Appendix J - Why Don’t Doctors See This? 66-68 Appendix K - Specialist vs General Practitioner - Who do you go to? 69 Appendix L - Rav Osher Weiss Psak - Comprehensive Review 70-79 Appendix M - Alternate Shailos for a Posek 80 Appendix N - An Open Letter to Poskim who demand vaccination 81-84 2 Table of Contents (cont) Page Time to Read Appendix O - Religious Exemption - Do you really want to give that up? 85-86 Appendix P - Ethical Argument 87-88 Appendix Q - Books - Is it responsible to Pasken without even reading one of these? 89 Appendix R - Smallpox and Polio 90-91 92 Appendix S - Flu Vaccines 93 Appendix T - Additional Resources and Interesting Articles 94 Appendix U - A critical lesson from the Ukraine 95 Follow-up Opportunities 96 3 -An important NOTICE for you- This presentation is not pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE June 23, 2005 Please Read This Article
    June 23, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—HOUSE 13935 why rescind support for highly re- rifice to be remembered for the good (Mr. WELDON) believe, that mercury spected objective news programs like and honorable actions he was doing in should be taken out of all childhood the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer and Iraq. vaccines and in fact all vaccines. Frontline? His service showed the true American We need to ask ourselves one simple Why cripple excellent radio stations spirit. While the Lapinskis lost their question: What is right? The answer I like WUKY and WEKU in my district, son, they know that he died preserving think is very clear. Get mercury out of jeopardizing shows like Morning Edi- and fighting for democracy. all vaccinations. tion and All Things Considered? Mr. Speaker, I ask all Americans to In reality the answer that is given by Why indeed? I cannot answer such join me in honoring a true American far too many officials in our govern- questions. The very notion of turning hero. ment, health agencies and some Mem- bers of Congress, sorry, we cannot help away from the future of public broad- f casting is preposterous. I am fearful you, and the need to protect the phar- ORDER OF BUSINESS this is an administration effort to ei- maceutical industry is so great, we ther censor public broadcasters or in- Mr. BURTON of Indiana. Mr. Speak- cannot do much about it. timidate them into favorably reporting er, I ask unanimous consent to claim b 1745 the time of the gentleman from Min- on the current administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H5074
    H5074 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE June 23, 2005 As Thomas Jefferson once said, MERCURY AND AUTISM them while at the same time changing Whenever people are well informed, The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a the Vaccine Injury Compensation Fund they can be trusted with their own gov- previous order of the House, the gen- in a way that will protect these fami- ernment. tleman from Indiana (Mr. BURTON) is lies and help those who have been dam- Maintaining our commitment to pub- recognized for 5 minutes. aged, but so far we have gotten abso- lic broadcasting will help keep the very Mr. BURTON of Indiana. Mr. Speak- lutely nowhere with them; and it is people who elect us well informed, and er, I have been down here a lot talking something I think we need to continue in doing so, help to promote the integ- about autism over the years and my to work on. rity and proper functioning of this very committee had many hearings on the Just recently, there was an article body itself. issue of autism. My grandson became that was published in a magazine I nor- I applaud the Members of this body autistic after receiving 9 shots in one mally do not read. It is called Rolling who rose to the defense of public broad- day, 7 of which contained mercury, in a Stone, but this article was brought to casting earlier today by voting to re- product called thimerosal. And he is my attention, and I think everybody in store funding to a cherished American doing better but it has been a very dif- this body ought to read that article.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Health Issue
    FIFTH EDITION 2006, Volume 45 R5 Environmental Health and Autism In thIs Issue: Time To GeT a Grip By martha r. Herbert, m.D., ph.D. Beyond Behavior—Biomedical Diagnoses in Autism spectrum Disorders By Margaret L. Bauman, M.D. transforming the Public Debate on neurotoxicants By Elise Miller, M.Ed. ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Autism does not have to be a life sentence You’re not about to give up on your child. Neither Are We. Since , the Autism Treatment Center of America™ has provided innovative training programs for parents and professionals caringifor children challenged by Autism Spectrum Disorders and related developmental difficulties. • Practical Tools • Powerful Results • Limitless Hope c Help your child improve in all areas of over p learning, development, communication and hoto skill acquisition. : © W I Join us for our internationally-acclaimed ll T ERR Son-Rise Program® Start-Up, a y comprehensive weeklong training program for parents and professionals. We don’t put limits on the possibilities for your child. Free 25-Minute Initial Call 877-766-7473 We’ll give you the keys to unlock their world. HOME OF THE SON-RISE PROGRAM® SINCE 1983 South Undermountain Road Sheffield, MA - USA Telephone: -- • E-mail: [email protected] www.autismtreatment.com Copyright © 2006 by The Option Institute & Fellowship. All rights reserved. 02.06-6 CONTENTS December 2006 page 18 SpOTlIGHT Time to Get A Grip By marTHa r. HerBerT, m.D., pH.D. Does an environmental role in autism make sense? How do we decide? And if environment is involved in autism, what do we do about it? These are challenging questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Anti-Vaccine Claims About NVICP Cases Are Wrong
    Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 11 8-7-2019 Using and Misusing Legal Decisions: Why Anti-Vaccine Claims about NVICP Cases Are Wrong Dorit Rubinstein Reiss UC Hastings College of Law Rachel Heap Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, and the Other Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Dorit Rubinstein Reiss & Rachel Heap, Using and Misusing Legal Decisions: Why Anti-Vaccine Claims about NVICP Cases Are Wrong, 20 MINN. J.L. SCI. & TECH. 191 (2018). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol20/iss1/11 The Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Using and Misusing Legal Decisions: Why Anti-Vaccine Claims about NVICP Cases Are Wrong Dorit Rubinstein Reiss*and Rachel Heap† Abstract The question of whether vaccines cause autism spectrum disorder (autism, or ASD) has been extensively studied. Studies from different countries around the world, looking at millions of children in total, examined it and found no link. Despite this powerful evidence, the actions of a small group who fervently believe that vaccines cause autism may lead people to question the data. One tactic used to argue that vaccines cause autism is the use of compensation decisions from the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program to claim such a link. This article demonstrates that not only does the nature of proof in the program make its decisions ill-suited to challenging the science but also that the cases used do not, in their content, support that conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Qt60b551qq Nosplash 1Dbebcd
    Copyright 2011 by Elena Conis ii Acknowledgements Portions of Chapter 6 appeared in the Journal of Medical Humanities 32, no. 2 (2011): 155-166. iii Abstract Calling the Shots: A Social History of Vaccination in the U.S., 1962 – 2008 Elena Conis In two centuries of vaccination in the U.S., the last five decades constituted a unique era. American children received more vaccines than any previous generation, and laws requiring their immunization against a litany of diseases became common. Vaccination rates soared, preventable infections plummeted, and popular acceptance of vaccines remained strong—even as an increasingly vocal cross-section of Americans questioned the safety and necessity of vaccines and the wisdom of related policies. This dissertation examines how and why, between the 1960s and 2000s, Americans came to accept the state–mandated vaccination of all children against a growing number of infections despite the growing prominence of vaccine doubts. I argue that vaccines and vaccine policies fundamentally changed the ways health experts and lay Americans perceived the diseases they were designed to prevent. Second, I demonstrate that vaccination policies and their acceptance throughout this period were as contingent on political, social, and cultural concerns as they were on scientific findings. Thirdly, I show how, as new vaccine policies took shape, feminism, environmentalism, and other social movements laid challenge to scientific and governmental authority, with profound—but previously overlooked—implications for how Americans perceived vaccination. Finally, I argue that the relationship between vaccination beliefs and political ideology is more complex than historians have heretofore asserted, for selective and blanket vaccination doubts at the end of the twentieth century were as informed by leftist critiques of iv capitalism and social hegemonies as by traditional American libertarian ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Unvaccinated Children Healthier Quotes "I've Been Practicing for 40
    Unvaccinated children healthier Quotes "I've been practicing for 40 years, and in the past 10 years the children have been sicker than ever."--Dr Doris J. Rapp, paediatric allergist. "I observed that my unvaccinated children were healthier, hardier and more robust than their vaccinated peers. Allergies, asthma and pallor and behavioral and attentional disturbances were clearly more common in my young patients who were vaccinated. My unvaccinated patients, on the other hand, did not suffer from infectious diseases with any greater frequency or severity than their vaccinated peers: their immune systems generally handled these challenges very well."--Incao's Hepatitis B Vaccination Testimony "Another point which I document in my presentation... is that there is little or no objective research into the possible adverse effects of vaccines. There has never been a study comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated children. The only explanation for this is bias and political pressure."--Philip Incao MD " One of the flaws in studies of vaccines is that there are no true placebo groups. The vaccine is tested in one group of immunized children and is compared to another group of immunized children."--Peter Baratosy I see many children in my practice. Some are immunized and some are not, my own children are not. I see the difference between the immunized and the non-immunized. They're much healthier and have less infections, colds, otitis media and tonsillitis. Dr. Michael Odent has written a letter in the JAMA (1994) where his figures show a five times higher rate of asthma in pertussis immunized children compared to non-immunized children.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccines: Separating Fact from Fiction
    Vaccinations Separating Fact from Fiction Presented by: Dr. Chad Jenkins Yesterday vs. Today • How many children in your class were autistic? • How many children in your class had asthma or needed inhalers? • Were peanut butter & jelly sandwiches banned at your school because they caused allergies? Yesterday vs. Today Autism • 1970’s – 1:10,000 children • 1980’s – 1:500 children • 1990’s – 1:200 children • Today – 1:166 children – That means that on average, 1:68 families now have an autistic child – By the way, no child is ever diagnosed with autism at birth, they become autistic… America’s Children Today • Our country is currently ranked last in the world in infant mortality rate • 10 million children have asthma • 40 million children have allergies • 1:400 children are Type I diabetic • 1:6 children are classified as learning disabled in some way • Pediatric cancer has been rising by 3% every year America’s Children Today So, if vaccines are healthy for our children, then we should have the healthiest kids on the planet…. More shots = better health? Childhood Vaccinations Vaccines are injections that contain weakened amounts of the disease germ that they are meant to protect against. They are said to work by stimulating the body to produce antibodies. Vaccines: Are they really safe and effective, by Neil Z. Miller 2006, pg 13 Normally Acquired When bacteria, viruses, and other foreign materials are breathed or swallowed, the first-line-of-defense is the mucous membranes. Invasions are partially neutralized before entering the stomach. The digestive system further destroys invaders... What do vaccines do? If the antigen eventually enters the blood stream through this natural method, the white blood cells attack and neutralize foreign substances.
    [Show full text]
  • Dare to Question | Vaccination
    Dare to Question One Parent to Another Information compiled by Ted Kuntz M.Ed. It would make life much easier if I could have total faith and not question everything all the time, but I can’t do it and I won’t do it. ~ Joey Skaggs Version: March 1, 2018 2 In Gratitude I am in deep gratitude to the following individuals who are courageous enough to publicly question the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. This list includes doctors, research scientists, politicians, parents and concerned citizens who risk their reputations and livelihoods to tell the truth. Andrew Wakefield MD, Brian Hooker Ph.D., Tony Bark MD Polly Tommy, Robert Sears MD, Anita Bratt ND Michael Leitner, James Lyons-Weiler Ph.D., Leon Chaitow Suzanne Humphries MD, Roman Bystrianyk, Paul Thomas MD Neil Z. Miller, Gary Goldman Ph.D., Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Robert De Niro, Sherri J. Tenpenny MD, Walene James Tetyana Obukhanych Ph.D., Brett Wilcox, Lauren Feder MD David Kirby, Dan Olmsted, Mark Blaxill, Mary Holland JD Kent Heckenlively, Judy Mikovits Ph.D., Alan Cassels Marcia Angell MD, David Lewis Ph.D., Linda Keller, Dan Burton Steven Druker, Kevin Barry, Sharyl Attkisson, Heather Fraser Andrew Moulden MD Ph.D., Vernon Coleman MD, Anne Dachel Jenny McCarthy, Edda West, Rita Hoffman, Nelle Maxey Claudina Michal-Teitelbaum MD, Richard Moskowitz MD Larry Palevksy MD, Todd M. Elsner DC, Philip F. Incao MD Barbara Loe Fisher, Ralph Campbell MD, Gregory Polland MD Russell Blaylock MD, Judy Converse MPH, Elliott Freed Peter Doshi Ph.D., Michael Crichton MD, Robert Mendelsohn MD Larry Solomon, Meryl Nass MD, Del Bigtree, Joel Lord Lorna Hancock, Aviva Jill Romm, Laura Hayes, Tim Sullivan Chris Shaw Ph.D., Jayne Donegan MD, and many others During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry's Story Is One of Very Many Children and Young People Who Were Not Born Autistic but Became So, Most Probably As a Result of Multiple Vaccines
    Harry’s Story A Brilliant Boy’s Short Life ‘Harry’s Story’ INDEX Introduction 2 Harry’s Story by JHR including- 6 -Litigation including submission to ECtHR 16 KR’s witness statement. 28 Carol and Martin Bailey’s witness statement. 53 Dr A Wakefield- report on HHR’s biopsy. 55 JHR’s Digest of Claimants’ Experts’ Reports in UK MMR/Autism litigation. 58 Dr. P Fletcher’s observations. 73 Dan Olmsted-The Amish Community. 87 David Thrower Briefing on Autism. 92 JABS Briefing with:- 112 -Manufacturers’ Product Sheet-warning/disclaimer. 114 -Report on US situation. 116 -Report on MMR in Japan. 116 Evidence of Harm-David Kirby. 136 Harry’s work including: 137 Moselle Series 1995-2000 Oak Lodge Series 2000-2005 The Bridge Series 2005-2008 Hoffmann Series 2008-2009 Daylight 2008-2009 The Way Forward.-after leaving school 206 Postscript 209 Appendices: 1.Schedule of ‘MMR 10’ Claimants 210 2.Hannah Poling legal judgment 211 3.Bailey Banks legal judgment. 254 4.Big Pharma Profits 312 E-Books references:- 314 -In Harm’s Way -Access to Justice 1 Introduction Harry was a gifted artist, model-maker, film-maker and musician. He developed skills throughout his childhood in North London, attending St Michael's School N6, Moselle N17, Oak Lodge N2 and finally The Bridge School in Islington. He was a handsome and healthy boy and developed a Herculean build as he grew up. Harry was also autistic. He developed autism late having received the MMR jab aged one, to which he had a very bad reaction. From being a healthy baby boy ahead on all his milestones before he was one he had to adapt to a difficult life as an a autistic person as he grew up.
    [Show full text]
  • Use and Abuse of Religious Exemptions from School Immunization Requirements
    K - Reiss_24 (E. GOLDBERG).DOC (Do Not Delete) 8/17/2014 4:56 PM Thou Shalt Not Take the Name of the Lord Thy God in Vain: Use and Abuse of Religious Exemptions from School Immunization Requirements Dorit Rubinstein Reiss* School immunization requirements are one way that states protect school age children against vaccine-preventable diseases. At present, forty-eight states allow parents to exempt their students from immunization requirements based on religious reasons, philosophical reasons, or either. This Article focuses on the religious exemption and makes three points. First, people lie to get a religious exemption. Second, U.S. jurisprudence makes preventing such abuse very hard. And third, because the religious exemption is so prone to abuse, we should remove it. The first part of the Article discusses the jurisprudence, and why our courts limit state officials’ ability to police abuse of the religious exemption. The Article then uses three sources to argue that religious exemptions are widely abused: survey data describing the reasons people do not vaccinate, the positions of established religions about vaccines, and posts from Facebook stating the poster lied to obtain a religious exemption. The Article concludes by discussing three potential solutions to the problem of widespread abuse of the religious exemption: tightening the scrutiny of requests for religious exemptions, limiting exemptions to medical exemptions only, and providing only a personal choice exemption. The Article is skeptical about whether tightening scrutiny is appropriate or constitutional, but sees the latter two options as offering a different balance of benefits and costs, though the author has a slight preference for a hard to obtain personal choice exemption.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Test Page 1 of 12
    CJR November/December 2005 - Drug Test Page 1 of 12 CJR Home » Issues » 2005 » Issue 6: November/December Drug Test By Daniel Schulman n May 18, 2004, the Institute of Medicine, a branch of the prestigious National Academies, delivered its eighth and final report on vaccine safety, seeking to end a O scientific controversy that had built to a slow boil over the previous five years: whether a mercury-containing vaccine preservative called thimerosal was to blame for an alarming spike in autism cases among a generation of children. After three years of reviewing this and other immunization safety questions on behalf of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the institute’s fourteen-member panel rejected the thimerosal link, and, in a powerful policy statement, recommended that research funding in this area be shifted toward other, more promising lines of inquiry. Under headlines such as this one from The Washington Post, EXPERTS FIND NO VACCINE-AUTISM LINK; PANEL SAYS MORE RESEARCH ON POSSIBLE CONNECTION MAY NOT BE WORTHWHILE, the press dutifully reported the IOM’s conclusions, perhaps as eager to lay the question to rest as the IOM panel itself. For a time it appeared the controversy over thimerosal would end there. It didn’t. Over the past seven months, it has gained traction again, leaving journalists in an awkward position. The thimerosal question — scientifically, politically, and emotionally complex — is proving to be a test for journalism, and the successes and failures are evident in the coverage. David Kirby, a Brooklyn-based writer, jumpstarted the debate in April with the publication of his book, Evidence of Harm, which lays out a compelling case for a connection between thimerosal and autism.
    [Show full text]