DOCSLIB.ORG

Polychaeta, Serpulidae) of the Arctic Ocean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Polychaeta, Serpulidae) of the Arctic Ocean A.N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution Australian Museum Research Institute Akvaplan-niva A.V. Rzhavsky, E.K. Kupriyanova, A.V. Sikorski, S. Dahle Calcareous tubeworms (Polychaeta, Serpulidae) of the Arctic Ocean KMK Scientific Press Moscow 2014 Alexander V. Rzhavsky, Elena K. Kupriyanova, Andrei V. Sikorski, Salve Dahle. Calcar- eous tubeworms (Polychaeta, Serpulidae) of the Arctic Ocean. Moscow. KMK Scientific Press, 2014. 191 pp., 1 table, 37 figures, 2 colour plates. The book is a taxonomic guide to serpulid polychaetes (including the subfamily Spirorb- inae) of the Arctic Ocean. Identification keys include 37 serpulid taxa, all of which are de- scribed and illustrated in detail. Taxonomic treatment of species includes discussion of taxo- nomic problems, nomenclatural types, synonyms, and differential diagnoses. Information is also available on species reproduction, ecology, distribution, and habitat and locality. Species illustrations are presented as scanning electron micrographs and light micrographs, as well as line drawings. A comprehensive glossary and literature reference section is included. The study is based on extensive material (more than 600 samples) collected all over the Arctic and deposited in Russia, Iceland, Germany, Norway, and Australia. This fully illustrated laborato- ry guide is intended for invertebrate zoologists, marine ecologists, environmental consult- ants, as well as students and naturalists. Cover photo: A.A. Semenov. Editors: A.V. Rzhavsky, A.N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution RAS, Moscow, Russia E.K. Kupriyanova, Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, Australia Reviewer: H.A. ten Hove, Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, Leiden, Netherlands ISBN 978-5-87317-988-6 © KMK Scientific Press, 2014. © Akvaplan-niva, 2014. 2 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 General morphology ...................................................................................................... 6 Glossary ....................................................................................................................... 16 The former subfamilies “Serpulinae” and “Filograninae” .......................................... 21 - Practical recommendations for identification of non-spirorbins ............................ 21 - Key to non-spirorbins based on tube morphology ................................................. 22 - Key to non-spirorbins based on specimen morphology ......................................... 24 - Genus Apomatus..................................................................................................... 26 - Apomatus globifer ............................................................................................... 29 - Genus Bathyvermilia .............................................................................................. 29 - Bathyvermilia eliasoni ........................................................................................ 29 - Bathyvermilia islandica ...................................................................................... 31 - Genus Chitinopoma ................................................................................................ 33 - Chitinopoma serrula ........................................................................................... 34 - Genus Ditrupa ........................................................................................................ 36 - Ditrupa arietina .................................................................................................. 37 - Genus Filograna .................................................................................................... 40 - Filograna implexa ............................................................................................... 40 - Genus Hyalopomatus ............................................................................................. 43 - Hyalopomatus claparedii .................................................................................... 44 - Genus Hydroides .................................................................................................... 45 - Hydroides norvegicus ......................................................................................... 46 - Genus Metavermilia ............................................................................................... 49 - Metavermilia arctica ........................................................................................... 49 - Genus Placostegus ................................................................................................. 51 - Placostegus tridentatus ....................................................................................... 52 - Genus Protis ........................................................................................................... 54 - Protis akvaplani .................................................................................................. 54 - Protis arctica ....................................................................................................... 56 - Genus Protula ........................................................................................................ 59 - Protula tubularia................................................................................................. 60 - Genus Serpula ........................................................................................................ 62 - Serpula vermicularis ........................................................................................... 63 - Genus Spirobranchus ............................................................................................. 65 - Spirobranchus triqueter ...................................................................................... 66 Spirorbinae................................................................................................................... 69 - Practical recommendations for identification of spirorbins ................................... 69 - Key to spirorbins .................................................................................................... 70 - Circeini ................................................................................................................... 77 - Genus Circeis ......................................................................................................... 77 4 - Circeis armoricana ............................................................................................. 77 - Circeis spirillum .................................................................................................. 81 - Genus Paradexiospira ............................................................................................ 83 - Subgenus Paradexiospira ...................................................................................... 84 - Paradexiospira (Paradexiospira) violacea ......................................................... 84 - Subgenus Spirorbides ............................................................................................. 86 - Paradexiospira (Spirorbides) cancellata ............................................................ 86 - Paradexiospira (Spirorbides) vitrea ................................................................... 88 - Januini .................................................................................................................... 91 - Genus Janua ........................................................................................................... 92 - Janua heterostropha............................................................................................ 92 - Pileolariini .............................................................................................................. 97 - Genus Bushiella ..................................................................................................... 97 - Subgenus Bushiella ................................................................................................ 98 - Bushiella (Bushiella) barentsii ............................................................................ 98 - Bushiella (Bushiella) evoluta ............................................................................ 101 - Bushiella (Bushiella) verruca ........................................................................... 103 - Subgenus Jugaria ................................................................................................. 106 - Bushiella (Jugaria) acuticostalis ...................................................................... 106 - Bushiella (Jugaria) granulata ........................................................................... 109 - Bushiella (Jugaria) kofiadii .............................................................................. 112 - Bushiella (Jugaria) quadrangularis.................................................................. 114 - Bushiella (Jugaria) similis ................................................................................ 117 - Genus Pileolaria .................................................................................................. 121 - Pileolaria ex gr. berkeleyana ............................................................................ 121 - Genus Protoleodora ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Polychaeta: Serpulidae) from Southeastern Australia
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Knight-Jones, E. W., P. Knight-Jones and L. C. Llewellyn, 1974. Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) from southeastern Australia. Notes on their taxonomy, ecology, and distribution. Records of the Australian Museum 29(3): 106–151. [1 May 1974]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.29.1974.230 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney naturenature cultureculture discover discover AustralianAustralian Museum Museum science science is is freely freely accessible accessible online online at at www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/www.australianmuseum.net.au/publications/ 66 CollegeCollege Street,Street, SydneySydney NSWNSW 2010,2010, AustraliaAustralia o ~------------------~o 25-20 and above 23-17 19- 14 17- 13 ood below 20 20 40 40 ,-- 50 50 Figure I.-Top left, collecting sites near Adelaide; top right, ditto near Sydney; bottom, collecting locations inset, showing also currents of warm, cool (interrupted lines) and cold water (dotted lines). A second smaller arrow-head indicates that the current occasionally reverses. Coastal water types and the mean position of the subtropical convergence (see p. 147) modified from Knox (1963), with mean summer (February) and winter (August) temperatures in degreesC. SPIRORBINAE (POLYCHAETA: SERPULIDAE) FROM SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA. Notes on their Taxonomy, Ecology, and Distribution By E. W. KNIGHT-jONES and PHYLLIS KNIGHT-jONES University College of Swansea, U.K. and L. C. LLEWELLYN, New South Wales State Fisheries, Sydney, Australia Figures 1-14 Manuscript received, 1st September, 1972 SUMMARY Fifteen species belonging to seven genera are described, with pictorial and dichotomous keys to identification and notes on their distribution in other regions. All occur on or adjoining the shore, or on seaweeds cast ashore.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptions of New Serpulid Polychaetes from the Kimberleys Of
    © The Author, 2009. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2009 Records of the Australian Museum (2009) Vol. 61: 93–199. ISSN 0067-1975 doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.61.2009.1489 Descriptions of New Serpulid Polychaetes from the Kimberleys of Australia and Discussion of Australian and Indo-West Pacific Species of Spirobranchus and Superficially Similar Taxa T. Gottfried Pillai Zoology Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom absTracT. In 1988 Pat Hutchings of the Australian Museum, Sydney, undertook an extensive polychaete collection trip off the Kimberley coast of Western Australia, where such a survey had not been conducted since Augener’s (1914) description of some polychaetes from the region. Serpulids were well represented in the collection, and their present study revealed the existence of two new genera, and new species belonging to the genera Protula, Vermiliopsis, Hydroides, Serpula and Spirobranchus. The synonymy of the difficult genera Spirobranchus, Pomatoceros and Pomatoleios is also dealt with. Certain difficult taxa currently referred to as “species complexes” or “species groups” are discussed. For this purpose it was considered necessary to undertake a comparison of apparently similar species, especially of Spirobranchus, from other locations in Australia and the Indo-West Pacific region. It revealed the existence of many more new species, which are also described and discussed below. Pillai, T. Gottfried, 2009. Descriptions of new serpulid polychaetes from the Kimberleys of Australia and discussion of Australian and Indo-West Pacific species ofSpirobranchus and superficially similar taxa.Records of the Australian Museum 61(2): 93–199. Table of contents Introduction ................................................................................................................... 95 Material and methods ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) Based on 18S Rdna Sequence Data, and Implications for Opercular Evolution Janina Lehrkea,Ã, Harry A
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2007) 195–206 www.elsevier.de/ode Phylogenetic relationships of Serpulidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) based on 18S rDNA sequence data, and implications for opercular evolution Janina Lehrkea,Ã, Harry A. ten Hoveb, Tara A. Macdonaldc, Thomas Bartolomaeusa, Christoph Bleidorna,1 aInstitute for Zoology, Animal Systematics and Evolution, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Koenigin-Luise-Street 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany bZoological Museum, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands cBamfield Marine Sciences Centre, Bamfield, British Columbia, Canada, V0R 1B0 Received 19 December 2005; accepted 2 June 2006 Abstract Phylogenetic relationships of (19) serpulid taxa (including Spirorbinae) were reconstructed based on 18S rRNA gene sequence data. Maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and maximum parsimony methods were used in phylogenetic reconstruction. Regardless of the method used, monophyly of Serpulidae is confirmed and four monophyletic, well- supported major clades are recovered: the Spirorbinae and three groups hitherto referred to as the Protula-, Serpula-, and Pomatoceros-group. Contrary to the taxonomic literature and the hypothesis of opercular evolution, the Protula- clade contains non-operculate (Protula, Salmacina) and operculate taxa both with pinnulate and non-pinnulate peduncle (Filograna vs. Vermiliopsis), and most likely is the sister group to Spirorbinae. Operculate Serpulinae and poorly or non-operculate Filograninae are paraphyletic. It is likely that lack of opercula in some serpulid genera is not a plesiomorphic character state, but reflects a special adaptation. r 2007 Gesellschaft fu¨r Biologische Systematik. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. Keywords: Serpulidae; Phylogeny; Operculum; 18S rRNA gene; Annelida; Polychaeta Introduction distinctive calcareous tubes and bilobed tentacular crowns, each with numerous radioles that bear shorter Serpulids are common members of marine hard- secondary branches (pinnules) on the inner side.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomineralization of Polychaete Annelids in the Fossil Record
    minerals Review Biomineralization of Polychaete Annelids in the Fossil Record Olev Vinn Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Ravila 14A, 50411 Tartu, Estonia; [email protected]; Tel.: +372-5067728 Received: 31 August 2020; Accepted: 25 September 2020; Published: 29 September 2020 Abstract: Ten distinct microstructures occur in fossil serpulids and serpulid tubes can contain several layers with different microstructures. Diversity and complexity of serpulid skeletal structures has greatly increased throughout their evolution. In general, Cenozoic serpulid skeletal structures are better preserved than Mesozoic ones. The first complex serpulid microstructures comparable to those of complex structures of molluscs appeared in the Eocene. The evolution of serpulid tube microstructures can be explained by the importance of calcareous tubes for serpulids as protection against predators and environmental disturbances. Both fossil cirratulids and sabellids are single layered and have only spherulitic prismatic tube microstructures. Microstructures of sabellids and cirratulids have not evolved since the appearance of calcareous species in the Jurassic and Oligocene, respectively. The lack of evolution in sabellids and cirratulids may result from the unimportance of biomineralization for these groups as only few species of sabellids and cirratulids have ever built calcareous tubes. Keywords: biominerals; calcite; aragonite; skeletal structures; serpulids; sabellids; cirratulids; evolution 1. Introduction Among polychaete annelids, calcareous tubes are known in serpulids, cirratulids and sabellids [1–3]. The earliest serpulids and sabellids are known from the Permian [4], and cirratulids from the Oligocene [5]. Only serpulids dwell exclusively within calcareous tubes. Polychaete annelids build their tubes from calcite, aragonite or a mixture of both polymorphs. Calcareous polychaete tubes possess a variety of ultrastructural fabrics, from simple to complex, some being unique to annelids [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Tampa Bay Benthic Monitoring Program: Status of Middle Tampa Bay: 1993-1998
    Tampa Bay Benthic Monitoring Program: Status of Middle Tampa Bay: 1993-1998 Stephen A. Grabe Environmental Supervisor David J. Karlen Environmental Scientist II Christina M. Holden Environmental Scientist I Barbara Goetting Environmental Specialist I Thomas Dix Environmental Scientist II MARCH 2003 1 Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County Richard Garrity, Ph.D. Executive Director Gerold Morrison, Ph.D. Director, Environmental Resources Management Division 2 INTRODUCTION The Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County (EPCHC) has been collecting samples in Middle Tampa Bay 1993 as part of the bay-wide benthic monitoring program developed to (Tampa Bay National Estuary Program 1996). The original objectives of this program were to discern the ―health‖—or ―status‖-- of the bay’s sediments by developing a Benthic Index for Tampa Bay as well as evaluating sediment quality by means of Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines (SQAGs). The Tampa Bay Estuary Program provided partial support for this monitoring. This report summarizes data collected during 1993-1998 from the Middle Tampa Bay segment of Tampa Bay. 3 METHODS Field Collection and Laboratory Procedures: A total of 127 stations (20 to 24 per year) were sampled during late summer/early fall ―Index Period‖ 1993-1998 (Appendix A). Sample locations were randomly selected from computer- generated coordinates. Benthic samples were collected using a Young grab sampler following the field protocols outlined in Courtney et al. (1993). Laboratory procedures followed the protocols set forth in Courtney et al. (1995). Data Analysis: Species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity, and Evenness were calculated using PISCES Conservation Ltd.’s (2001) ―Species Diversity and Richness II‖ software.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marine Fauna of New Zealand : Spirorbinae (Polychaeta : Serpulidae)
    ISSN 0083-7903, 68 (Print) ISSN 2538-1016; 68 (Online) The Marine Fauna of New Zealand : Spirorbinae (Polychaeta : Serpulidae) by PETER J. VINE ANOGlf -1,. �" ii 'i ,;.1, J . --=--� • ��b, S�• 1 • New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir No. 68 1977 The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Frontispiece Spirorbinae on a piece of alga washed up on the New Zealand seashore. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ NEW ZEALAND DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Spirorbinae (Polychaeta: Serpulidae) by PETER J. VINE Department of Zoology, University College, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales, UK and School of Biological Sciences, James Cook University of North Queensland, Townsville, Australia PERMANENT ADDRESS "Coe! na Mara", Faul, c/- Dr Casey, Clifden, County Galway, Ireland New Zealand Oceanographic Institute Memoir No. 68 1977 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Citation according to World list of Scientific Periodicals (4th edition: Mem. N.Z. oceanogr. Inst. 68 ISSN 0083-7903 Received for publication at NZOI January 1973 Edited by T. K. Crosby, Science InformationDivision, DSIR and R.
    [Show full text]
  • Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat (Efh) Amendment 2 Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    New England Fishery Management Council 50 WATER STREET | NEWBURYPORT, MASSACHUSETTS 01950 | PHONE 978 465 0492 | FAX 978 465 3116 E.F. “Terry” Stockwell III, Chairman | Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director OMNIBUS ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT (EFH) AMENDMENT 2 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact (SASI) approach: a tool for analyzing the effects of fishing on Essential Fish Habitat Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact Approach This document was prepared by the following members of the NEFMC Habitat Plan Development team, with feedback from the NEFMC Habitat Oversight Committee, NEFMC Habitat Advisory Panel, and interested members of the public. Michelle Bachman, NEFMC staff Peter Auster, University of Connecticut Chad Demarest, NOAA/Northeast Fisheries Science Center Steve Eayrs, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Kathyrn Ford, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Jon Grabowski, Gulf of Maine Research Institute Brad Harris, University of Massachusetts School of Marine Science and Technology Tom Hoff, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council Mark Lazzari, Maine Department of Marine Resources Vincent Malkoski, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Dave Packer, NOAA/ Northeast Fisheries Science Center David Stevenson, NOAA/Northeast Regional Office Page Valentine, U.S. Geological Survey January 2011 Page 2 of 257 Appendix D: The Swept Area Seabed Impact Approach Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW OF THE SWEPT AREA SEABED IMPACT MODEL ........... 13 2.0 DEFINING HABITAT ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annelida, Serpulidae
    Graellsia, 72(2): e053 julio-diciembre 2016 ISSN-L: 0367-5041 http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/graellsia.2016.v72.120 SERPÚLIDOS (ANNELIDA, SERPULIDAE) COLECTADOS EN LA CAMPAÑA OCEANOGRÁFICA “FAUNA II” Y CATÁLOGO ACTUALIZADO DE ESPECIES ÍBERO-BALEARES DE LA FAMILIA SERPULIDAE Jesús Alcázar* & Guillermo San Martín Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, calle Darwin, 2, Canto Blanco, 28049 Madrid, España. *Dirección para la correspondencia: [email protected] RESUMEN Se presentan los resultados de la identificación del material de la familia Serpulidae (Polychaeta) recolectado en la campaña oceanográfica Fauna II, así como la revisión de citas de presencia íbero-balear desde el catálogo de poliquetos más reciente (Ariño, 1987). Se identificaron 16 especies pertenecientes a 10 géneros, además de la primera cita íbero-balear de una quimera bioperculada (Ten Hove & Ben-Eliahu, 2005) de la especie Hydroides norvegicus Gunnerus, 1768. En cuanto a la revisión del catálogo se mencionan 65 especies, actuali- zando el nombre de 20 de ellas y añadiendo cinco especies ausentes en el catálogo de Ariño (1987): Hydroides stoichadon Zibrowius, 1971, Laeospira corallinae (de Silva & Knight-Jones, 1962), Serpula cavernicola Fassari & Mòllica, 1991, Spirobranchus lima (Grube, 1862) y Spirorbis inornatus L’Hardy & Quièvreux, 1962. Se cita por primera vez Vermiliopsis monodiscus Zibrowius, 1968 en el Atlántico ibérico y a partir de la bibliografía consultada, se muestra la expansión en la distribución íbero-balear
    [Show full text]
  • Polychaete Worms Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera
    THE POLYCHAETE WORMS DEFINITIONS AND KEYS TO THE ORDERS, FAMILIES AND GENERA THE POLYCHAETE WORMS Definitions and Keys to the Orders, Families and Genera By Kristian Fauchald NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY In Conjunction With THE ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Science Series 28 February 3, 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ix INTRODUCTION 1 CHARACTERS USED TO DEFINE HIGHER TAXA 2 CLASSIFICATION OF POLYCHAETES 7 ORDERS OF POLYCHAETES 9 KEY TO FAMILIES 9 ORDER ORBINIIDA 14 ORDER CTENODRILIDA 19 ORDER PSAMMODRILIDA 20 ORDER COSSURIDA 21 ORDER SPIONIDA 21 ORDER CAPITELLIDA 31 ORDER OPHELIIDA 41 ORDER PHYLLODOCIDA 45 ORDER AMPHINOMIDA 100 ORDER SPINTHERIDA 103 ORDER EUNICIDA 104 ORDER STERNASPIDA 114 ORDER OWENIIDA 114 ORDER FLABELLIGERIDA 115 ORDER FAUVELIOPSIDA 117 ORDER TEREBELLIDA 118 ORDER SABELLIDA 135 FIVE "ARCHIANNELIDAN" FAMILIES 152 GLOSSARY 156 LITERATURE CITED 161 INDEX 180 Preface THE STUDY of polychaetes used to be a leisurely I apologize to my fellow polychaete workers for occupation, practised calmly and slowly, and introducing a complex superstructure in a group which the presence of these worms hardly ever pene- so far has been remarkably innocent of such frills. A trated the consciousness of any but the small group great number of very sound partial schemes have been of invertebrate zoologists and phylogenetlcists inter- suggested from time to time. These have been only ested in annulated creatures. This is hardly the case partially considered. The discussion is complex enough any longer. without the inclusion of speculations as to how each Studies of marine benthos have demonstrated that author would have completed his or her scheme, pro- these animals may be wholly dominant both in num- vided that he or she had had the evidence and inclina- bers of species and in numbers of specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • (Annelida: Polychaeta: Serpulidae). II
    Invertebrate Zoology, 2015, 12(1): 61–92 © INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY, 2015 Tube morphology, ultrastructures and mineralogy in recent Spirorbinae (Annelida: Polychaeta: Serpulidae). II. Tribe Spirorbini A.P. Ippolitov1, A.V. Rzhavsky2 1 Geological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (GIN RAS), 7 Pyzhevskiy per., Moscow, Russia, 119017, e-mail: [email protected] 2 A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy of Sciences (IPEE RAS), 33 Leninskiy prosp., Moscow, Russia, 119071, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: This is the second paper of the series started with Ippolitov and Rzhavsky (2014) providing detailed descriptions of recent spirorbin tubes, their mineralogy and ultrastructures. Here we describe species of the tribe Spirorbini Chamberlin, 1919 that includes a single genus Spirorbis Daudin, 1800. Tube ultrastructures found in the tribe are represented by two types — irregularly oriented prismatic (IOP) structure forming the thick main layer of the tube and in some species spherulitic prismatic (SPHP) structure forming an outer layer and, sometimes, inner. Mineralogically tubes are either calcitic or predom- inantly aragonitic. Correlations of morphological, ultrastructural, and mineralogical char- acters are discussed. All studied members of Spirorbini can be organized into three groups that are defined by both tube characters and biogeographical patterns and thus, likely correspond to three phylogenetic clades within Spirorbini. How to cite this article: Ippolitov A.P., Rzhavsky A.V. 2015. Tube morphology, ultrastruc- tures and mineralogy in recent Spirorbinae (Annelida: Polychaeta: Serpulidae). II. Tribe Spirorbini // Invert. Zool. Vol.12. No.1. P.61–92. KEY WORDS: Tube ultrastructures, tube morphology, tube mineralogy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction analysis, Spirorbinae, Spirorbini.
    [Show full text]