Congressional Record—Senate S10090

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

S10090 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE July 29, 2003 this shortage. If we don’t have an ade- incentives to move in that direction. solid data. So I urge that we adopt this quate supply, it will affect the econ- But I am very worried we are going to amendment, and let’s leave the choice omy across the board. It is already af- cause some real damage. What about in the hands of the American people fecting the chemical industry in my the choice made by Americans? This is and not have the ‘‘Grand Poobah Gov- State, and the fertilizer industry. It is still America, isn’t it? ernment’’ tell us what we have to do in going to affect people’s quality of life. Is the Federal Government going to one more area. Don’t make the Amer- This is so important. We need the mandate that every driver drive an ican people drive this little grunt of a whole package. We need more produc- automobile like the one in this pic- car shown here. tion. We need new technology. We need ture? Last year, I talked about the Mr. President, do I have any time re- clean coal technology. That is just one ‘‘purple people eater.’’ Shown in this maining? example. We need more conservation of picture is a version of the ‘‘purple peo- The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- a responsible nature. We need to look ple eater.’’ That might be fine around ator has 31⁄2 minutes remaining. at alternative fuels. I think a lot of town in Washington, DC, but I can tell Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I yield the these alternative fuels are, quite frank- you, on some of the back roads in my remainder of my time to the Senator ly, not very legitimate. But it is legiti- State of Mississippi that will get you from Missouri, keeping in mind that mate to try to find alternative fuels. killed. That is not practical and people Senator BOND would have 2 minutes to I urge my colleagues, let us work to- will not choose to drive it. They want close at the end of the debate on this gether. Let us get this done, get it into an SUV or they want a pickup truck. section, I believe. conference, and let us produce a na- And they don’t want to be penalized by The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Sen- tional energy policy. the Federal Government saying to ator from Missouri. I think this issue is more important them: You have to do this. And, by the Mr. TALENT. Mr. President, I doubt than any issue Congress is considering way, if you don’t do this, we will make I will use the full 31⁄2 minutes. It is just at this time. It is urgent that we get you pay some kind of a price. This is that I ran out of time before when I this work done. ridiculous. was in the middle of ranting and raving I wanted to speak in support of the In my own case, my family is grow- on this subject. I would hate to close Bond-Levin amendment. I know very ing. We have our children and grand- my remarks on that tone, anyway. good work has been done on this children. It is a wonderful deal. Then, Let me explain to the Senate why amendment. I worked last year with in August, when we take our annual this is so important to me personally. Senator BOND and Senator LEVIN. They family vacation, I have a choice. I can I recently visited the Kansas City Ford have given a lot of thought to how this have a bigger automobile with the plant where they make the new Ford should be designed. It bases decisions three seats in it, where we can securely 150 truck. It is a triumph of American on these CAFE standards on science carefully fasten our grandchildren in engineering and the productivity of and solid data. I believe this idea of these safety seats. We can take two American workers. just plucking a number out of the air automobiles, each being an SUV, or we The workers there are proud of that and saying that number is achievable can take three automobiles. Now, how truck. And they should be proud of it. is irresponsible. It may not even be much fuel is saved? And how much It means many people will be able to achievable. Based on what? It makes safety is given up? travel in this country safely and with somebody feel good? And what about Mr. President, this is ridiculous. It comfort. I drive an SUV. I don’t drive the choices for the American people? continues to be. It was last year. The it because I am trying to hurt the envi- What about the sacrifices in safety American people are speaking with ronment or affect our energy independ- that we are asking them to make? their choices. They are voting with ence. I drive it because we have small When you just pick a number, such their feet and their cash. They can buy children. I used to drive a hatchback, as 32 miles per gallon or 37 miles per these more fuel-efficient automobiles, but if we got in an accident in that gallon, I don’t think that is a wise de- but they are not doing it. hatchback, it would fold up like an ac- cision, unless it has been based on What percent is actually buying cordion. That is why I drive an SUV. thorough study and solid data. Of these smaller automobiles? I think, That is why millions of people do. course, the organization to make that any way you slice it, not more than 14 The Senator from Mississippi is right determination is the NHTSA. They percent. The American people are mak- to say it is wrong to disparage these have the expertise to analyze the num- ing other choices. vehicles. People who make these vehi- bers and consider all that should be in- So I think what we are doing is very cles in Missouri and around the coun- volved, including the jobs that might important. I think there are a lot of try are proud of what they do. They are be affected, the technology, how this very substantive issues involved, and satisfied with their jobs. Let’s not improved fuel efficiency could be ob- the least of which is not the American gamble with their jobs. We are trying tained, and, yes, safety. There are pro- people’s choices. to come out of a recession. We are try- posals out there which would adversely I do not think we should be forced to ing to create jobs in this country. affect all these areas, including jobs, drive that automobile shown in the pic- Vote for the Bond-Levin amendment. employment, consumer choice, and ture. I don’t know who makes that It is a good, modern amendment and safety. automobile. I don’t know where it is moves us forward. It protects people’s The National Academy of Sciences made, but it is probably reposing some- jobs. I urge the Senate to support the CAFE report declared there will be where in France or Germany. I like the amendment. more deaths and injuries if fuel econ- bigger vehicle shown in the picture be- I thank the Senator from Mississippi omy standards are raised too fast with- hind it. for yielding me a few extra minutes. I out proper consideration given to how The American people have a need for yield back whatever time remains. that is being done and what impact it vans or SUVs or pickup trucks. I un- f might have. derstand there is going to be an amend- This amendment is supported by a ment offered that will pick on particu- EXECUTIVE SESSION broad coalition: labor, the UAW, the larly light trucks. Goodness gracious, AFL-CIO, the Chamber of Commerce, light trucks use less fuel. Why pick on the National Association of Manufac- a light truck versus a heavy truck? NOMINATION OF PRISCILLA turers, the Farm Bureau, automobile This makes no sense. RICHMAN OWEN, OF TEXAS, TO dealers, and over 40 other organiza- I oppose the amendment that is going BE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR THE FIFTH CIR- tions. That ought to tell you some- to be advocated by Senator MCCAIN CUIT—Resumed thing. That type of broad support indi- and, I think, Senator FEINSTEIN. I op- cates that people are concerned about pose the Durbin amendment. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under what might be done with this CAFE This amendment by BOND and LEVIN the previous order, not withstanding standard. is bipartisan. It makes common sense. the provisions of rule XXII, there will Yes, we should continue to work to It moves us in the right direction. But now be 1 hour of debate equally divided improve fuel efficiency. We should have it is based on commonsense science and between the Senator from Utah, Mr. VerDate jul 14 2003 00:04 Jul 30, 2003 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 0624 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\G29JY6.031 S29PT1 July 29, 2003 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S10091 HATCH, or his designee, and the Senator Mr. HATCH. Mr. President, I rise Justice Owen is committed to legal from Vermont, Mr. LEAHY, or his des- today to speak on behalf of the nomi- services for the poor. She successfully ignee. nation of Priscilla Owen for the United fought with others for more funding for The Senator from Nevada.
Recommended publications
  • Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges

    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges

    Trump Judges: Even More Extreme Than Reagan and Bush Judges September 3, 2020 Executive Summary In June, President Donald Trump pledged to release a new short list of potential Supreme Court nominees by September 1, 2020, for his consideration should he be reelected in November. While Trump has not yet released such a list, it likely would include several people he has already picked for powerful lifetime seats on the federal courts of appeals. Trump appointees' records raise alarms about the extremism they would bring to the highest court in the United States – and the people he would put on the appellate bench if he is reelected to a second term. According to People For the American Way’s ongoing research, these judges (including those likely to be on Trump’s short list), have written or joined more than 100 opinions or dissents as of August 31 that are so far to the right that in nearly one out of every four cases we have reviewed, other Republican-appointed judges, including those on Trump’s previous Supreme Court short lists, have disagreed with them.1 Considering that every Republican president since Ronald Reagan has made a considerable effort to pick very conservative judges, the likelihood that Trump could elevate even more of his extreme judicial picks raises serious concerns. On issues including reproductive rights, voting rights, police violence, gun safety, consumer rights against corporations, and the environment, Trump judges have consistently sided with right-wing special interests over the American people – even measured against other Republican-appointed judges. Many of these cases concern majority rulings issued or joined by Trump judges.
  • Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M

    Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 18, 2005 No. 66 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was U.S. SENATE, EXECUTIVE SESSION called to order by the Honorable SAM PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE, BROWNBACK, a Senator from the State Washington, DC, May 18, 2005. of Kansas. To the Senate: NOMINATION OF PRISCILLA Under the provisions of rule I, paragraph 3, RICHMAN OWEN TO BE UNITED PRAYER of the Standing Rules of the Senate, I hereby STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE FOR appoint the Honorable SAM BROWNBACK, a THE FIFTH CIRCUIT The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Senator from the State of Kansas, to per- fered the following prayer: form the duties of the Chair. Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, I ask Let us pray. TED STEVENS, unanimous consent that the Senate Eternal Spirit, the fountain of light President pro tempore. now proceed to executive session to and wisdom, without Whom nothing is Mr. BROWNBACK thereupon as- consider calendar No. 71, the nomina- holy and nothing prevails, You have sumed the Chair as Acting President tion of Priscilla Owen to be United challenged us to let our lights shine, so pro tempore. States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Cir- that people can see our good works and cuit; provided further that the first glorify Your Name. f hour of debate, from 9:45 to 10:45, be Today, shine the light of Your pres- RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME under the control of the majority lead- ence through our Senators and illu- er or his designee; further that the minate our Nation and world.
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)

    Senate Section (PDF929KB)

    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
  • Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: an Empirical Ranking of Judicial Performance†

    Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: an Empirical Ranking of Judicial Performance†

    Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: † An Empirical Ranking of Judicial Performance Stephen Choi* ** Mitu Gulati † © 2004 Stephen Choi and Mitu Gulati. * Roger J. Traynor Professor, U.C. Berkeley Law School (Boalt Hall). ** Professor of Law, Georgetown University. Kindly e-mail comments to [email protected] and [email protected]. Erin Dengan, Édeanna Johnson-Chebbi, Margaret Rodgers, Rishi Sharma, Jennifer Dukart, and Alice Kuo provided research assistance. Kimberly Brickell deserves special thanks for her work. Aspects of this draft benefited from discussions with Alex Aleinikoff, Scott Baker, Lee Epstein, Tracey George, Prea Gulati, Vicki Jackson, Mike Klarman, Kim Krawiec, Kaleb Michaud, Un Kyung Park, Greg Mitchell, Jim Rossi, Ed Kitch, Paul Mahoney, Jim Ryan, Paul Stefan, George Triantis, Mark Seidenfeld, and Eric Talley. For comments on the draft itself, we are grateful to Michael Bailey, Suzette Baker, Bill Bratton, James Brudney, Steve Bundy, Brannon Denning, Phil Frickey, Michael Gerhardt, Steve Goldberg, Pauline Kim, Bill Marshall, Don Langevoort, Judith Resnik, Keith Sharfman, Steve Salop, Michael Seidman, Michael Solimine, Gerry Spann, Mark Tushnet, David Vladeck, Robin West, Arnold Zellner, Kathy Zeiler, Todd Zywicki and participants at workshops at Berkeley, Georgetown, Virginia, FSU, and UNC - Chapel Hill. Given the unusually large number of people who have e-mailed us with comments on this project, it is likely that there are some who we have inadvertently failed to thank. Our sincerest apologies to them. Disclosure: Funding for this project was provided entirely by our respective law schools. One of us was a law clerk to two of the judges in the sample: Samuel Alito of the Third Circuit and Sandra Lynch of the First Circuit.
  • Statement on the Senate Filibusters of the Nominations of Miguel A

    Statement on the Senate Filibusters of the Nominations of Miguel A

    564 May 8 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2003 Statement on the Senate Filibusters United States of America, it is hereby or- of the Nominations of Miguel A. dered as follows: Estrada and Priscilla Owen To Be Section 1. Interagency Group on Insular Judges on the United States Court of Areas. (a) There is established, within the Appeals Department of the Interior for administra- tive purposes, the Interagency Group on In- May 8, 2003 sular Areas (IGIA). The group shall consist exclusively of: Miguel Estrada and Priscilla Owen have (i) the heads of the executive depart- been waiting 2 years for an up-or-down vote ments; and in the Senate. Both of these nominees are (ii) the heads of such agencies as the Sec- of the highest integrity and character with retary of the Interior may designate. tremendous legal experience. Both have (b) The Secretary of the Interior, or the been unanimously rated ‘‘well-qualified’’ by Secretary’s designee under section 1(c) of the American Bar Association. Each has the this order, shall convene and preside at the support of a majority of Senators, yet votes meetings of the IGIA, determine its agenda, on their nominations are being blocked by direct its work and, as appropriate to deal a minority of Senators who are engaged in simultaneous filibusters. These partisan ob- with particular subject matters, establish and structionist tactics are unprecedented, unac- direct subgroups of the IGIA that shall con- ceptable, and inconsistent with the Senate’s sist exclusively of members of the IGIA. constitutional responsibility. (c) A member of the IGIA may designate, Because of the Senate’s failure to hold to perform the IGIA or IGIA subgroup func- timely votes, the number of judicial vacancies tions of the member, any person who is a has become unacceptably high.
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

    In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

    Case 2:09-cv-06299-WHA-DEK Document 49 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RHONDA DANOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-6299 EDITH JONES, Chief Judge, United States ) Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, ) JUDGE W. HAROLD ALBRITTON individually and in her official capacity as ) presiding officer of the Judicial Council of ) the Fifth Circuit, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION This cause is before the court on a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #43), filed by the Defendants on May 19, 2010. The Plaintiff was given an opportunity to respond to the Motion and did so, and the Defendants, with the consent of the Plaintiff, sought and obtained permission of the court to file a Reply in support of their Motion. To aid in its understanding of the parties’ positions, the court held oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss on June 24, 2010. The Plaintiff, Rhonda Danos, filed a Complaint for Declaratory Judgment on September 15, 2009. The Defendants are the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit, Edith Jones, Carolyn Dineen King, Jerry E. Smith, W. Eugene Davis, Rhesa H. Barksdale, Edith Brown Clement, Priscilla Owen, Jennifer Walker Elrod, Leslie H. Southwick, Sarah Vance, Neal B. Biggers Jr., Louis G. Guirola, Sam R. Cummings, Hayden Head, and Fred Biery, all of whom are judges named individually and in their capacities as members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. Case 2:09-cv-06299-WHA-DEK Document 49 Filed 07/08/10 Page 2 of 13 Danos seeks a Declaratory Judgment, reinstatement of her employment, back pay and benefits, and attorneys’ fees and costs.
  • Congressional Record—Senate S8167

    Congressional Record—Senate S8167

    December 5, 2011 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S8167 EXECUTIVE SESSION ported by the Judiciary Committee on publican leadership at the end of last September 15 without opposition from year to refuse to agree to votes on a single member of the Committee, those nominations. That decision stood NOMINATION OF EDGARDO RAMOS Democratic or Republican. Mr. in stark contrast to the practice fol- TO BE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Furman, an experienced Federal pros- lowed by the Democratic majority in JUDGE FOR THE SOUTHERN DIS- ecutor who served as Counselor to At- the Senate during President Bush’s TRICT OF NEW YORK torney General Michael Mukasey for first two years. Last year, Senate Re- two years during the Bush Administra- publicans refused to use the same tion, is a nominee with an impressive standards for considering President NOMINATION OF ANDREW L. CAR- background and bipartisan support. Obama’s judicial nominees as we did TER, JR., TO BE UNITED STATES There is no reason or explanation for when the Senate gave up or down votes DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE why the Senate could not also consider to all 100 of President Bush’s judicial SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW his nomination today. nominations reported by the Com- YORK There is also no reason or expla- mittee in his first two years. All 100 nation why Republican leadership will were confirmed before the end of the not consent to consider the other 20 ju- 107th Congress, including two con- NOMINATION OF JAMES RODNEY dicial nominations waiting for final troversial circuit court nominations GILSTRAP TO BE UNITED Senate action, all but four of which reported and then confirmed during the STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR were reported by the Committee with- lame duck session in 2002.
  • Texas Law Judicial Clerks List

    Texas Law Judicial Clerks List

    Texas Law Judicial Clerks List This list includes Texas Law alumni who reported their clerkships to the Judicial Clerkship Program – or whose names were published in the Judicial Yellow Book or Martindale Hubbell – and includes those who clerked during the recent past for judges who are currently active. There are some judges and courts for which few Texas Law alumni have clerked – in these cases we have listed alumni who clerked further back or who clerked for judges who are no longer active. Dates following a law clerk or judge’s name indicate year of graduation from the University of Texas School of Law. Retired or deceased judges, or those who has been appointed to another court, are listed at the end of each court section and denoted (*). Those who wish to use the information on this list will need to independently verify the information being used. Federal Courts U.S. Supreme Court ............................................................................................................. 2 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals ............................................................................................. 3 First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Fourth Circuit Fifth Circuit Sixth Circuit Seventh Circuit Eighth Circuit Ninth Circuit Tenth Circuit Eleventh Circuit Federal Circuit District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Courts of Limited Jurisdiction ...................................................................................... 9 Executive Office for Immigration Review U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces U.S. Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. Court of International Trade U.S. Tax Court U.S. District Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ............................................................ 10 State Courts State Appellate Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ........................................................ 25 State District & County Courts (listed alphabetically by state) ..........................................
  • The Nomination of Justice Priscilla Owen

    The Nomination of Justice Priscilla Owen

    S. HRG. 108–142 SETTING THE RECORD STRAIGHT: THE NOMINATION OF JUSTICE PRISCILLA OWEN HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 13, 2003 Serial No. J–108–6 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 89–329 DTP WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 15:36 Oct 09, 2003 Jkt 089329 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\89329.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah, Chairman CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts JON KYL, Arizona JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware MIKE DEWINE, Ohio HERBERT KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin LARRY E. CRAIG, Idaho CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois JOHN CORNYN, Texas JOHN EDWARDS, North Carolina MAKAN DELRAHIM, Chief Counsel and Staff Director BRUCE A. COHEN, Democratic Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 15:36 Oct 09, 2003 Jkt 089329 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\89329.TXT SJUD4 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Cornyn, Hon. John, a U.S.
  • Kavanaugh Part 2

    Kavanaugh Part 2

    Dinh, Viet From: Dinh, Viet Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:52 PM To: Willett, Don; Koebele, Steve; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Enron/Owen Options Heather and Matt: Thoughts? Feinstein told Hutcheson that she has a problem with Owen not returning Enron contributions, an(b) (5) -----Original Message----- From: Willett, Don Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:56 AM To: Koebele, Steve; Dinh, Viet Subject: RE: Enron/Owen Options (b) (5) -----Original Message----- From: Koebele, Steve Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 9:33 AM To: Dinh, Viet Cc: Willett, Don Subject: Enron/Owen Options Viet, for your discussions today, please consider the following options ... (b) (5) Suggestion: (b) (5) Options: 1 2(b) (5) 007104-002458 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7387 3 Viet, I again recommen 007104-002459 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7387 Dinh, Viet From: Dinh,Viet Sent: Wednesday,March20,200212:14PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: VRADraftViewsletter Attachments: VRAviewsletter--final.wpd 007104-002460 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7300 Koebele, Steve From: Koebele, Steve Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:39 PM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Cc: McMahon, Lori; Goodling, Monica; Willett, Don; Dinh, Viet; O'Brien, Pat; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; (b)(6) Jennifer Oschal Email Dinh, Viet; Newstead, Jennifer; Keefer, WendyJ Subject: Owen Attachments Attachments: Biography-Owen.wpd; Campaign Fin-Enron 03-01-02.wpd All --Attached for your use are two documents related to Justice Owen: (1) a Biography that showcases her strong background;and (2) responsive talking points on the Enron case opinion.
  • May 21, 2020 RE: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Chief

    May 21, 2020 RE: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Chief

    May 21, 2020 RE: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Chief Judge Priscilla Owen to Keynote the Texas Supreme Court Historical Society’s 25th Annual Hemphill Dinner — For Immediate Release — The Texas Supreme Court Historical Society is excited to announce that the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, former Texas Supreme Court Justice Priscilla R. Owen, will keynote the Society’s 25th Annual Hemphill Dinner to be held at 7 p.m. on Friday, September 11, 2020. For the first time ever, the Hemphill Dinner will be held virtually in light of concerns surrounding COVID-19. OFFICERS Mr. Dylan O. Drummond More details regarding accessing the Dinner broadcast will be released closer to the President event. Ms. Cynthia K. Timms President-elect Prior to her confirmation to the federal bench in 2005, Chief Judge Owen Mr. Thomas S. Leatherbury Treasurer served with distinction for a decade on the Texas Supreme Court. First elected in Hon. Ken Wise 1994, she was just the second female Justice to be elected to the Court in its history. Secretary On the Fifth Circuit, she succeeded former Texas Supreme Court Justice, Judge Ms. Marcy Hogan Greer Immediate Past President William Garwood, in the seat he had held since 1981. Alongside the late Judge Garwood, Tom Reavley, Sam Johnson, and current Fifth Circuit Judge Don Willett, BOARD OF TRUSTEES Chief Judge Owen is the fifth former Texas Supreme Court Justice to serve on the Ms. Alia Adkins-Derrick Hon. Jane Bland, Justice Fifth Circuit. In addition, Chief Judge Owen is the first and only former Texas Hon.
  • Advise & Consent

    Advise & Consent

    The Los Angeles County Bar Association Appellate Courts Section Presents Advise & Consent: A Primer to the Federal Judicial Appointment Process Wednesday, October 28, 2020 Program - 12:00 - 1:30 PM Zoom Webinar CLE Credit: 1.5 Hours Credit (including Appellate Courts Specialization) Provider #36 The Los Angeles County Bar Association is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider. The Los Angles County Bar Association certifies that this activity has been approved for MCLE credit by the State Bar of California. PANELIST BIOS Judge Kenneth Lee (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) Kenneth Kiyul Lee is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Senate confirmed him on May 15, 2019, making him the nation’s first Article III judge born in the Republic of Korea. Prior to his appointment, Judge Lee was a partner at the law firm of Jenner & Block in Los Angeles, where he handled a wide variety of complex litigation matters and had a robust pro bono practice. Judge Lee previously served as an Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush and as Special Counsel to Senator Arlen Specter, then-chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He started his legal career as an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York. Judge Lee is a 2000 magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School and a 1997 summa cum laude graduate of Cornell University. He clerked for Judge Emilio M. Garza of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from 2000 to 2001. Judge Leslie Southwick (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) Leslie Southwick was appointed to the U.S.