PRIMARY PRODUCTION METHODS 2277 Area of Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PRIMARY PRODUCTION METHODS 2277 Area of Research PRIMARY PRODUCTION METHODS 2277 area of research. The Rrst computation of global Falkowski PG and Woodhead AD (eds) (1992) Primary oceanic primary production using the remote- Productivity and Biogeochemical Cycles in the Sea. sensing approach appeared in the literature in 1995 New York: Plenum Press. (Figure 1). Other, similar computations have Geider RJ and Osborne BA (1992). Algal Photosynthesis. since appeared in the literature. It is a method that New York: Chapman & Hall. will continue to improve, with improvements in Li WKW and Maestrini SY (eds) (1993) Measurement of Primary Production from the Molecular to the Global satellite technology as well as in the techniques for Scale, ICES Marine Science Symposia, vol. 197. extrapolation of local biological measurements to Copenhagen: International Council for the Exploration large scales. of the Sea. Longhurst A (1998) Ecological Geography of the Sea. San Diego: Academic Press. See also Longhurst A, Sathyendranath S, Platt T and Caverhill C (1995) An estimate of global primary production in Microbial Loops. Network Analysis of Food Webs. the ocean from satellite radiometer data. Journal of Ocean Gyre Ecosystems. Pelagic Biogeography. Plankton Research 17: 1245}1271. Primary Production Processes. Primary Produc- Mann KH and Lazier JRN (1991) Dynamics of Marine tion Methods. Ecosystems. Biological}Physical Interactions in the Oceans. Cambridge, USA: Blackwell Science. Platt T and Sathyendranath S (1993) Estimators of pri- Further Reading mary production for interpretation of remotely sensed data on ocean color. Journal of Geophysical Research Chisholm SW and Morel FMM (eds) (1991) What Con- 98: 14561}14576. trols Phytoplankton Production in Nutrient-Rich Areas Platt T, Harrison WG, Lewis MR et al. (1989) Biological of the Open Sea? vol. 36. Lawrence, KS: American production of the oceans: the case for a consensus. Society of Limnology and Oceanography. Marine Ecology Progress Series 52: 77}88. PRIMARY PRODUCTION METHODS J. J. Cullen, Department of Oceanography, measurement programs. However, details of these Halifax, Canada patterns can depend on methodology, so it is Copyright ^ 2001 Academic Press important to appreciate the uncertainties and built- in biases associated with different methods for doi:10.1006/rwos.2001.0203 measuring primary production. Introduction De\nitions Primary production is the synthesis of organic ma- Primary production is centrally important to eco- terial from inorganic compounds, such as CO2 and logical processes and biogeochemical cycling in water. The synthesis of organic carbon from CO2 is marine systems. It is thus surprising, if not discon- R R commonly called carbon xation: CO2 is xed by certing, that (as discussed by Williams in 1993), both photosynthesis and chemosynthesis. By far, there is no consensus on a deRnition of planktonic photosynthesis by phytoplankton accounts for most primary productivity, or its major components, net marine primary production. Carbon Rxation by and gross primary production. One major reason macroalgae, microphytobenthos, chemosynthetic for the problem is that descriptions of ecosystems microbes, and symbiotic associations can be locally require clear conceptual deRnitions for processes important. (e.g., net daily production of organic material by Only the measurement of marine planktonic phytoplankton), whereas the interpretation of primary production will be discussed here. These measurements requires precise operational deRni- measurements have been made for many decades tions, for example, net accumulation of radiolabeled using a variety of approaches. It has long been CO2 in particulate matter during a 24 h incubation. recognized that different methods yield different Conceptual and operational deRnitions can be rec- results, yet it is equally clear that the variability of onciled for particular approaches, but no one set of primary productivity, with depth, time of day, deRnitions is sufRciently general, yet detailed, to season, and region, has been well described by most serve as a framework both for measuring planktonic 2278 PRIMARY PRODUCTION METHODS primary production with a broad variety of methods ed as CH2O. Carbon dioxide in sea water is found and for interpreting the measurements in a range of in several chemical forms which exchange quickly R R scienti c contexts. It is nonetheless useful to de ne enough to be considered in aggregate as total CO2 three components of primary production that can be (TCO2). In principle, photosynthesis can be quanti- estimated from measurements in closed systems: Red by measuring any of three light-dependent pro- cesses: (1) the increase in organic carbon; (2) the E Gross primary production (Pg ) is the rate of decrease of TCO2 ; or (3) the increase of O2. How- photosynthesis, not reduced for losses to excre- ever, growth of phytoplankton is not so simple: tion or to respiration in its various forms since phytoplankton are composed of proteins, E Net primary production (Pn) is gross primary lipids, nucleic acids, and other compounds production less losses to respiration by phyto- besides carbohydrate, both photosynthesis and plankton the assimilation of nutrients are required. Conse- E Net community production (Pnc) is net primary quently, many chemical transformations are asso- production less losses to respiration by hetero- ciated with primary production, and eqn [1] does trophic microorganisms and metazoans. not accurately describe the process of light-depen- dent growth. Other components of primary production, such as It is therefore useful to describe the growth of new production, regenerated production, and export phytoplankton (i.e., net primary production) with production, must be characterized to describe food- a more general reaction that describes how trans- web dynamics and biogeochemical cycling. As formations of carbon and oxygen depend on the pointed out by Platt and Sathyendranath in 1993, in source of nutrients (particularly nitrogen) and on any such analysis, great care must be taken to the chemical composition of phytoplankton. For reconcile the temporal and spatial scales of both growth on nitrate: the measurements and the processes they describe. \# # Marine primary production is commonly ex- 1.0NO3 5.7CO2 5.4H2O pressed as grams or moles of carbon Rxed per unit P(C H O N)#8.25O #1.0OH\ [2] volume, or pet unit area, of sea water per unit time. 5.7 9.8 2.3 2 The timescale of interest is generally 1 day or The idealized organic product, C H O N, rep- 1 year. Rates are characterized for the euphotic 5.7 9.8 2.3 resents the elemental composition of phytoplankton. zone, commonly deRned as extending to the depth Ammonium is more reduced than nitrate, so less of 1% of the surface level of photosynthetically water is required to satisfy the demand for reduc- active radiation (PAR: 400}700nm). This conve- tant: nient deRnition of euphotic depth (sometimes sim- pliRed further to three times the depth at which 1.0NH>#5.7CO #3.4H O a Secchi disk disappears) is a crude and often inac- 4 2 2 P # # > curate approximation of where gross primary pro- (C5.7H9.8 O2.3N) 6.25O2 1.0H [3] duction over 24 h matches losses to respiration and excretion by phytoplankton. Regardless, rates of The photosynthetic quotient (PQ; mol mol\1) is the R photosynthesis are generally insigni cant below the ratio of O2 evolved to inorganic C assimilated. It depth of 0.1% surface PAR. must be speciRed to convert increases of oxygen to the synthesis of organic carbon. For growth on ni- \1 Photosynthesis and Growth of trate as described by eqn [2], PQ is 1.45 mol mol ; with ammonium as the source of N, PQ is 1.10. The Phytoplankton photosynthetic quotient also reSects the end prod- Primary production is generally measured by quan- ucts of photosynthesis, the mixture of which varies tifying light-dependent synthesis of organic carbon according to environmental conditions and the spe- from CO2 or evolution of O2 consistent with the cies composition of phytoplankton. For example, if simpliRed description of photosynthesis as the the synthesis of carbohydrate is favored, as can reaction: occur in high light or low nutrient conditions, PQ is lower because the reaction described in eqn [1] be- &8hJ comes more important. Uncertainty in PQ is often CO #2H O &P (CH O)#H O#O [1] 2 2 2 2 2 ignored. This can be justiRed when the synthesis of organic carbon is measured directly, but large errors Absorbed photons are signiRed by hl and the carbo- can be introduced when attempts are made to hydrates generated by photosynthesis are represent- infer carbon Rxation from the dynamics of oxygen. PRIMARY PRODUCTION METHODS 2279 Excretion of organic material would have a small sult from that for the light bottle. It is thus assumed inSuence on PQ and is not considered here. that respiration in the light equals that in the dark. As documented by Geider and Osborne in their Approaches 1992 monograph, this assumption does not gener- ally hold, so errors in estimation of the respiratory Primary production can be estimated from chloro- component of Pg must be tolerated unless isotopi- phyll (from satellite color or in situ Suorescence) if cally labelled oxygen is used (see below). carbon uptake per unit of chlorophyll is known. Methods based on the direct measurement of Therefore, `global' estimates of primary production oxygen are less sensitive than techniques using the depend on direct measurements by incubation. The isotopic tracer 14C. However, careful implementa- technical objectives are to obtain a representative tion of procedures using automated titration or sample of sea water, contain it so that no signiRcant pulsed oxygen electrodes can yield useful and exchange of materials occurs, and to measure light- reliable data, even from oligotrophic waters of the dependent changes in carbon or oxygen during incu- open ocean. Interpretation of results is complicated bations that simulate the natural environment. by containment effects common to all methods for Methods vary widely, and each approach involves direct measurement of primary production (see be- compromises between needs for logistical conveni- low).
Recommended publications
  • A Comparison of Global Estimates of Marine Primary Production from Ocean Color
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Deep-Sea Research II 53 (2006) 741–770 www.elsevier.com/locate/dsr2 A comparison of global estimates of marine primary production from ocean color Mary-Elena Carra,Ã, Marjorie A.M. Friedrichsb,bb, Marjorie Schmeltza, Maki Noguchi Aitac, David Antoined, Kevin R. Arrigoe, Ichio Asanumaf, Olivier Aumontg, Richard Barberh, Michael Behrenfeldi, Robert Bidigarej, Erik T. Buitenhuisk, Janet Campbelll, Aurea Ciottim, Heidi Dierssenn, Mark Dowello, John Dunnep, Wayne Esaiasq, Bernard Gentilid, Watson Greggq, Steve Groomr, Nicolas Hoepffnero, Joji Ishizakas, Takahiko Kamedat, Corinne Le Que´re´k,u, Steven Lohrenzv, John Marraw, Fre´de´ric Me´lino, Keith Moorex, Andre´Moreld, Tasha E. Reddye, John Ryany, Michele Scardiz, Tim Smythr, Kevin Turpieq, Gavin Tilstoner, Kirk Watersaa, Yasuhiro Yamanakac aJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA 91101-8099, USA bCenter for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Crittenton Hall, 768 West 52nd Street, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA cEcosystem Change Research Program, Frontier Research Center for Global Change, 3173-25,Showa-machi, Yokohama 236-0001, Japan dLaboratoire d’Oce´anographie de Villefranche, 06238, Villefranche sur Mer, France eDepartment of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2215, USA fTokyo University of Information Sciences 1200-1, Yato, Wakaba, Chiba 265-8501, Japan gLaboratoire d’Oce´anographie Dynamique et de Climatologie, Univ Paris 06, MNHN, IRD,CNRS, Paris F-75252 05, France hDuke University
    [Show full text]
  • A New Type of Plankton Food Web Functioning in Coastal Waters Revealed by Coupling Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse Metho
    A new type of plankton food web functioning in coastal waters revealed by coupling Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse method and Ecological Network Analysis Marouan Meddeb, Nathalie Niquil, Boutheina Grami, Kaouther Mejri, Matilda Haraldsson, Aurélie Chaalali, Olivier Pringault, Asma Sakka Hlaili To cite this version: Marouan Meddeb, Nathalie Niquil, Boutheina Grami, Kaouther Mejri, Matilda Haraldsson, et al.. A new type of plankton food web functioning in coastal waters revealed by coupling Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse method and Ecological Network Analysis. Ecological Indicators, Elsevier, 2019, 104, pp.67-85. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.077. hal-02146355 HAL Id: hal-02146355 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02146355 Submitted on 3 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 A new type of plankton food web functioning in coastal waters revealed by coupling 2 Monte Carlo Markov Chain Linear Inverse method and Ecological Network Analysis 3 4 5 Marouan Meddeba,b*, Nathalie Niquilc, Boutheïna Gramia,d, Kaouther Mejria,b, Matilda 6 Haraldssonc, Aurélie Chaalalic,e,f, Olivier Pringaultg, Asma Sakka Hlailia,b 7 8 aUniversité de Carthage, Faculté des Sciences de Bizerte, Laboratoire de phytoplanctonologie 9 7021 Zarzouna, Bizerte, Tunisie.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: the “METABOLISM” of ECOSYSTEMS
    7.014 Handout PRODUCTIVITY: THE “METABOLISM” OF ECOSYSTEMS Ecologists use the term “productivity” to refer to the process through which an assemblage of organisms (e.g. a trophic level or ecosystem assimilates carbon. Primary producers (autotrophs) do this through photosynthesis; Secondary producers (heterotrophs) do it through the assimilation of the organic carbon in their food. Remember that all organic carbon in the food web is ultimately derived from primary production. DEFINITIONS Primary Productivity: Rate of conversion of CO2 to organic carbon (photosynthesis) per unit surface area of the earth, expressed either in terns of weight of carbon, or the equivalent calories e.g., g C m-2 year-1 Kcal m-2 year-1 Primary Production: Same as primary productivity, but usually expressed for a whole ecosystem e.g., tons year-1 for a lake, cornfield, forest, etc. NET vs. GROSS: For plants: Some of the organic carbon generated in plants through photosynthesis (using solar energy) is oxidized back to CO2 (releasing energy) through the respiration of the plants – RA. Gross Primary Production: (GPP) = Total amount of CO2 reduced to organic carbon by the plants per unit time Autotrophic Respiration: (RA) = Total amount of organic carbon that is respired (oxidized to CO2) by plants per unit time Net Primary Production (NPP) = GPP – RA The amount of organic carbon produced by plants that is not consumed by their own respiration. It is the increase in the plant biomass in the absence of herbivores. For an entire ecosystem: Some of the NPP of the plants is consumed (and respired) by herbivores and decomposers and oxidized back to CO2 (RH).
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Production and Respiration
    Organic matter production % 0 Dissolved Particulate 5 > Organic Organic Matter Matter Heterotrophic Bacterial Grazing Growth ~1-10% of net organic DOM does not matter What happens to the 90-99% of sink, but can be production is physically exported to organic matter production that does deep sea not get exported as particles? transported Export •Labile DOC turnover over time scales of hours to days. •Semi-labile DOC turnover on time scales of weeks to months. •Refractory DOC cycles over on time scales ranging from decadal to multi- decadal…perhaps longer •So what consumes labile and semi-labile DOC? How much carbon passes through the microbial loop? Phytoplankton Heterotrophic bacteria ?? Dissolved organic Herbivores ?? matter Higher trophic levels Protozoa (zooplankton, fish, etc.) ?? • Very difficult to directly measure the flux of carbon from primary producers into the microbial loop. – The microbial loop is mostly run on labile (recently produced organic matter) - - very low concentrations (nM) turning over rapidly against a high background pool (µM). – Unclear exactly which types of organic compounds support bacterial growth. Bacterial Production •Step 1: Determine how much carbon is consumed by bacteria for production of new biomass. •Bacterial production (BP) is the rate that bacterial biomass is created. It represents the amount of Heterotrophic material that is transformed from a nonliving pool bacteria (DOC) to a living pool (bacterial biomass). •Mathematically P = µB ?? µ = specific growth rate (time-1) B = bacterial biomass (mg C L-1) P= bacterial production (mg C L-1 d-1) Dissolved organic •Note that µ = P/B matter •Thus, P has units of mg C L-1 d-1 Bacterial production provides one measurement of carbon flow into the microbial loop How doe we measure bacterial production? Production (∆ biomass/time) (mg C L-1 d-1) • 3H-thymidine • 3H or 14C-leucine Note: these are NOT direct measures of biomass production (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION and EVAPOTRANSPIRATION by Steven W
    15 GLOBAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION by Steven W. Running and Maosheng Zhao DATA PRODUCTS Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer Terrestrial primary production provides the energy to (MODIS) sensor, these variables are calculated maintain the structure and functions of ecosystems, every eight days in near real time at 1 km resolution. and supplies goods (e.g. food, fuel, wood and fi bre) MODIS GPP, NPP and ET data are available at the for human society. Gross primary production (GPP) EOS data gateway (see link below). is the amount of carbon fi xed by photosynthesis, To correct for contamination in the global and net primary production (NPP) is the amount of refl ectance data due to severe cloudiness or aerosols carbon converted into biomass after subtracting in the near real time products, these datasets are the cost of plant respiration. The water loss through reprocessed at the end of each year to build more exchange of trace gas CO2 by leaf stomata during stable, permanent datasets. These end-of-year photosynthesis plus evaporation from soil and versions of MODIS GPP, NPP and ET are available at plants is evapotranspiration (ET). ET computes the NTSG, University of Montana (see link below). water lost by a land surface, so it is consequently a component of the water balance in a region, and RESULTS FOR 2000–2006 is therefore relevant for drought monitoring and Figure 1 shows the seven-year average MODIS water management, providing an assessment of NPP for vegetated land on earth at 1 km spatial the water potentially available for human society.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytoplankton As Key Mediators of the Biological Carbon Pump: Their Responses to a Changing Climate
    sustainability Review Phytoplankton as Key Mediators of the Biological Carbon Pump: Their Responses to a Changing Climate Samarpita Basu * ID and Katherine R. M. Mackey Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 January 2018; Accepted: 12 March 2018; Published: 19 March 2018 Abstract: The world’s oceans are a major sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). The biological carbon pump plays a vital role in the net transfer of CO2 from the atmosphere to the oceans and then to the sediments, subsequently maintaining atmospheric CO2 at significantly lower levels than would be the case if it did not exist. The efficiency of the biological pump is a function of phytoplankton physiology and community structure, which are in turn governed by the physical and chemical conditions of the ocean. However, only a few studies have focused on the importance of phytoplankton community structure to the biological pump. Because global change is expected to influence carbon and nutrient availability, temperature and light (via stratification), an improved understanding of how phytoplankton community size structure will respond in the future is required to gain insight into the biological pump and the ability of the ocean to act as a long-term sink for atmospheric CO2. This review article aims to explore the potential impacts of predicted changes in global temperature and the carbonate system on phytoplankton cell size, species and elemental composition, so as to shed light on the ability of the biological pump to sequester carbon in the future ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • Moe Pond Limnology and Fisii Population Biology: an Ecosystem Approach
    MOE POND LIMNOLOGY AND FISII POPULATION BIOLOGY: AN ECOSYSTEM APPROACH C. Mead McCoy, C. P.Madenjian, J. V. Adall1s, W. N. I-Iannan, D. M. Warner, M. F. Albright, and L. P. Sohacki BIOLOGICAL FIELD STArrION COOPERSTOWN, NEW YORK Occasional Paper No. 33 January 2000 STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my gratitude to the members of my graduate committee: Willard Harman, Leonard Sohacki and Bruce Dayton for their comments in the preparation of this manuscript; and for the patience and understanding they exhibited w~lile I was their student. ·1 want to also thank Matthew Albright for his skills in quantitative analyses of total phosphorous and nitrite/nitrate-N conducted on water samples collected from Moe Pond during this study. I thank David Ramsey for his friendship and assistance in discussing chlorophyll a methodology. To all the SUNY Oneonta BFS interns who lent-a-hand during the Moe Pond field work of 1994 and 1995, I thank you for your efforts and trust that the spine wounds suffered were not in vain. To all those at USGS Great Lakes Science Center who supported my efforts through encouragement and facilities - Jerrine Nichols, Douglas Wilcox, Bruce Manny, James Hickey and Nancy Milton, I thank all of you. Also to Donald Schloesser, with whom I share an office, I would like to thank you for your many helpful suggestions concerning the estimation of primary production in aquatic systems. In particular, I wish to express my appreciation to Charles Madenjian and Jean Adams for their combined quantitative prowess, insight and direction in data analyses and their friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • Fertilizing the Ocean with Iron Is This a Viable Way to Help Reduce Carbon Dioxide Levels in the Atmosphere?
    380 Fertilizing the Ocean with Iron Is this a viable way to help reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere? 360 ive me half a tanker of iron, and I’ll give you an ice Twenty years on, Martin’s line is still viewed alternately age” may rank as the catchiest line ever uttered by a as a boast or a quip—an opportunity too good to pass up or a biogeochemist.“G The man responsible was the late John Martin, misguided remedy doomed to backfire. Yet over the same pe- former director of the Moss Landing Marine Laboratory, who riod, unrelenting increases in carbon emissions and mount- discovered that sprinkling iron dust in the right ocean waters ing evidence of climate change have taken the debate beyond could trigger plankton blooms the size of a small city. In turn, academic circles and into the free market. the billions of cells produced might absorb enough heat-trap- Today, policymakers, investors, economists, environ- ping carbon dioxide to cool the Earth’s warming atmosphere. mentalists, and lawyers are taking notice of the idea. A few Never mind that Martin companies are planning new, was only half serious when larger experiments. The ab- 340 he made the remark (in his Ocean Iron Fertilization sence of clear regulations for “best Dr. Strangelove accent,” either conducting experiments he later recalled) at an infor- An argument for: Faced with the huge at sea or trading the results mal seminar at Woods Hole consequences of climate change, iron’s in “carbon offset” markets Oceanographic Institution outsized ability to put carbon into the oceans complicates the picture.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue Sufficient Time As Well for Them to Respond
    www.limnology.org Volume 59 - December 2011 Editorial There is encouraging news from some of the SIL working groups. Plankton Ecology Some delay has again occurred in preparing Group (PEG) lately rejuvenated its activities While care is taken to accurately report the SIL newsletter and putting it on internet. by arranging a meeting in Amsterdam in April information, SILnews is not responsible The reasons are not quite the same as for 2010, after years of slumber and stillness. The for information and/or advertisements the delay in bringing out the summer 2011 published herein and does not endorse, Proceedings Special of the Amsterdam meet- newsletter. This time, more than anything approve or recommend products, ing should appear by early spring as a Special programs or opinions expressed. else, our WG chairmen have rather disap- Issue of Freshwater Biology. Furthermore, pointed by not providing me adequate and the PEG has announced in this newsletter its timely feedback about their respective group next meeting in Mexico City (12-18 February activities. I had requested them and given 2012: see the Announcement). In the present In This Issue sufficient time as well for them to respond. Issue, there is also a progress report from I even sent the WG chairmen reminders the SIL WG Ecohydrology. Moreover, the through our secretariat (Ms. Denise Johnson youngest of the SIL working groups, Winter EDITOR’S FOREWORD ..............1-2 sent them all emails). As newsletter Editor, I Limnology, has announced its third meeting always feel that it is essential to provide timely REPORTS ....................................2-11 in as many years of its existence.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OFFICIAL Magazine of the OCEANOGRAPHY SOCIETY
    OceThe Officiala MaganZineog of the Oceanographyra Spocietyhy CITATION Leichter, J.J., A.L. Alldredge, G. Bernardi, A.J. Brooks, C.A. Carlson, R.C. Carpenter, P.J. Edmunds, M.R. Fewings, K.M. Hanson, J.L. Hench, and others. 2013. Biological and physical interactions on a tropical island coral reef: Transport and retention processes on Moorea, French Polynesia. Oceanography 26(3):52–63, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5670/oceanog.2013.45. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2013.45 COPYRIGHT This article has been published inOceanography , Volume 26, Number 3, a quarterly journal of The Oceanography Society. Copyright 2013 by The Oceanography Society. All rights reserved. USAGE Permission is granted to copy this article for use in teaching and research. Republication, systematic reproduction, or collective redistribution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The Oceanography Society. Send all correspondence to: [email protected] or The Oceanography Society, PO Box 1931, Rockville, MD 20849-1931, USA. doWnloaded from http://WWW.tos.org/oceanography SPECIAL IssUE ON CoASTAL LonG TERM ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH BIOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS ON A TROPICAL ISLAND CORAL REEF TRANSPORT AND RETENTION PROCESSES ON MOOREA, FRENCH POLYNESIA BY JAMES J. LEICHTER, ALICE L. ALLDREDGE, GIACOMO BERNARDI, AnDREW J. BRooKS, CRAIG A. CARLson, RobERT C. CARPENTER, PETER J. EDMUNDS, MELANIE R. FEWINGS, KATHARINE M. HAnson, JAMES L. HENCH, SALLY J. HoLBRooK, CRAIG E. NELson, RUssELL J. SCHMITT, RobERT J. ToonEN, LIBE WASHBURN, AND ALEX S.J. WYATT 52 Oceanography | Vol. 26, No. 3 AbsTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • SSWIMS: Plankton
    Unit Six SSWIMS/Plankton Unit VI Science Standards with Integrative Marine Science-SSWIMS On the cutting edge… This program is brought to you by SSWIMS, a thematic, interdisciplinary teacher training program based on the California State Science Content Standards. SSWIMS is provided by the University of California Los Angeles in collaboration with the Los Angeles County school districts, including the Los Angeles Unified School District. SSWIMS is funded by a major grant from the National Science Foundation. Plankton Lesson Objectives: Students will be able to do the following: • Determine a basis for plankton classification • Differentiate between various plankton groups • Compare and contrast plankton adaptations for buoyancy Key concepts: phytoplankton, zooplankton, density, diatoms, dinoflagellates, holoplankton, meroplankton Plankton Introduction “Plankton” is from a Greek word for food chains. They are autotrophs, “wanderer.” It is a making their own food, using the collective term for process of photosynthesis. The the various animal plankton or zooplankton eat organisms that drift or food for energy. These swim weakly in the heterotrophs feed on the open water of the sea or microscopic freshwater lakes and ponds. These world of the weak swimmers, carried about by sea and currents, range in size from the transfer tiniest microscopic organisms to energy up much larger animals such as the food jellyfish. pyramid to fishes, marine mammals, and humans. Plankton can be divided into two large groups: planktonic plants and Scientists are interested in studying planktonic animals. The plant plankton, because they are the basis plankton or phytoplankton are the for food webs in both marine and producers of ocean and freshwater freshwater ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Dead Zones: Causes, Impacts, Policy Challenges, and a Model of the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone S
    58 The Economics of Dead Zones: Causes, Impacts, Policy Challenges, and a Model of the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone S. S. Rabotyagov*, C. L. Klingy, P. W. Gassmanz, N. N. Rabalais§ ô and R. E. Turner Downloaded from Introduction The BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 increased public awareness and http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/ concern about long-term damage to ecosystems, and casual readers of the news headlines may have concluded that the spill and its aftermath represented the most significant and enduring environmental threat to the region. However, the region faces other equally challenging threats including the large seasonal hypoxic, or “dead,” zone that occurs annually off the coast of Louisiana and Texas. Even more concerning is the fact that such dead zones have been appearing worldwide at proliferating rates (Conley et al. 2011; Diaz and Rosenberg 2008). Nutrient over- enrichment is the main cause of these dead zones, and nutrient-fed hypoxia is now widely at Iowa State University on January 27, 2014 considered an important threat to the health of aquatic ecosystems (Doney 2010). The rather alarming term dead zone is surprisingly appropriate: hypoxic regions exhibit oxygen levels that are too low to support many aquatic organisms including commercially desirable species. While some dead zones are naturally occurring, their number, size, and *School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; e-mail: [email protected] yCenter for Agricultural and Rural Development,
    [Show full text]