Department for Education Mid-Year Report to Parliament Chris Wormald, Permanent Secretary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department for Education Mid-Year Report to Parliament Chris Wormald, Permanent Secretary Department for Education mid-year report to Parliament Chris Wormald, Permanent Secretary April to September 2013 Contents Executive Summary 3 Performance 4 Coalition Priority - Increase the number of high quality schools and introduce fair funding 4 Coalition Priority - Reform the school curriculum and qualifications 5 Coalition Priority - Reduce bureaucracy and improve accountability 6 Coalition Priority - Train and develop the professionals who work with children 6 Coalition Priority - Introduce new support for the Early Years 7 Coalition Priority - Improve support for children, young people and families, focusing on the most disadvantaged 7 Financial Performance 9 Management Commentary 10 Resource 10 Capital 11 Cash 11 Major Projects 12 People 13 Management Commentary 15 Annex A: Input and Impact Indicators 17 Tables Table 1: Year to date expenditure against Main Estimate Plan 9 Table 2: Workforce Information 13 2 Executive Summary The Department for Education (DfE) continues to make good progress against its six priorities set by the coalition. In addition to delivering against these priorities the department has continued to drive forward the wider reform agenda. Substantial progress has been achieved in support of the recommendations set out in the DfE Review which was published in November 2012. We continue to deliver improvements and efficiencies and are on track to secure at least a 50% reduction in our Administrative expenditure by 2015-16. The pace of change has been very rapid during the six months to September, particularly for staff within the department. The pace and scale of this change has influenced elements of our staff survey results. 3 Performance The six Department for Education coalition priorities are set out below with key achievements across the mid-year reporting period. The full list of input and impact indicators is shown in annex A. Coalition Priority - Increase the number of high quality schools and introduce fair funding Achievements April to September 2013: • 390 academies opened (219 converters and 171 sponsored academies). • Secured 32 new academy sponsors. • 400 failing primary schools open, or on the way to opening, as academies, in 2013. • Announced the successful Targeted Basic Need applications on 18 July 2013. • Implemented major reform of the schools funding system in 2013-14, and (in June) announced further improvements for 2014-15. The proportion of schools’ funding which is allocated on pupil needs increased from 71% in 2012-13 to 90% in 2013-14. • Ofsted Section 5 inspections for the first free schools which opened in September 2011 found 75% of schools to be good or outstanding. • Opened the largest ever number of new schools (118) – 93 free schools, 13 Studio Schools and 12 University Technical Colleges (UTCs). 4 Coalition Priority - Reform the school curriculum and qualifications Achievements April to September 2013: • The national curriculum review concluded with the new national curriculum published on 11 September 2013 for first teaching in September 2014. • There were improved results in key stage 1 (KS1) and key stage 2 (KS2) tests and a sharp increase in those passing the Year 1 phonics check from 58% in 2012 to 69% in 2013. • Reforms to GCSEs have prioritised English language, English literature and mathematics. New content for those subjects was published on 1 November, on track for first teaching from 2015. GCSEs in other subjects (including English Baccalaureate (EBacc) subjects will be reformed for first teaching from September 2016. • A and AS levels: Awarding Organisations (AOs) have started the 6-8 month development period for new linear stand- alone qualifications in the high volume subjects (except maths and languages) for first teaching from September 2015. Maths, languages and other subjects will be available the following year. • The proportion of state school students entering for the EBacc combination of subjects rose to 35.4% (from 21.8% in 2010) on the basis of provisional figures. The proportion achieving the EBacc rose to 22.6% (from 15.1% in 2010). 5 Coalition Priority - Reduce bureaucracy and improve accountability Achievements April to September 2013: • Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector announced that the percentage of schools rated as good and outstanding has risen to 78% (from 70%) and the number of schools graded ‘requires improvement’ has fallen to 19%. • Revised school inspections handbook published for the autumn 2013 term, covering what constitutes good progress, a new focus on attitudes to learning linked to behaviour, strengthens guidance on KS1 assessment and introduces a new focus on middle leadership. • Governors’ Handbook published in May, replacing the Governors’ Guide to the Law and including guidance for both academies and maintained schools. Coalition Priority - Train and develop the professionals who work with children Achievements April to September 2013: • The total number of initial teacher training entrants in 2012/13 was 34,880. This included 20,480 on a primary programme (98% of the target) and 13,350 on a secondary programme (107% of target). The final numbers reflected small adjustments from provisional data published in November 2012. • Provisional data1, published in November 2013, shows: • The total number of new entrants who have started, or expect to start, a primary or secondary initial teacher training programme in the academic year 2013/14 is 33,110 (96% of the target). • The number of new entrants who have started, or expect to start, a primary programme is 19,820 (96% of the target), and the number of new entrants who have started, or expect to start, a secondary programme is 13,300 (96% of the target). • The proportion of postgraduate new entrants with a first class or 2:1 classified UK degree is 74%, compared with 71% in 2012/13 and 66% in 2011/12. 1 Provisional data will be updated at the end of the academic year and published in November 2014. 6 • We have over recruited against expectations in some subjects such as English (128% of target achieved), chemistry (127%) and history (143%) Acceptances for priority subjects in 2013/14 are down against the Teachers Supply Model (TSM), in particular physics (72% of target achieved), computer science (57%), maths (90%) and modern foreign languages (83%). • Bursaries and scholarships for 2014/15 were announced on 17 October 2013 and increased bursaries in subjects where greater numbers of good quality applicants are required. • Demand for School Direct places in 2014/15 is up from approximately 10,000 in 2013/14 to 18,000 in 2014/15. • The Secretary of State gave oral evidence to the School Teachers Review Body (STRB) on 23 September. STRB will report on the reform of leadership pay, allowances and non-pay conditions in January 2014. • Social Worker programme delivery: over 3,000 expressions of interest from potential ‘Frontline’ candidates and ‘Step Up to Social Work’ cohort on track to have over 300 participants. • New Chief Social Worker appointed and in post. • Early years: Delivery of reforms announced in ‘More Great Childcare’ is on track – 2,327 (97% of target) trainee Early Years Teachers and 16 ‘Teach First in the early years’ candidates recruited for 2013/14. Coalition Priority - Introduce new support for the Early Years Achievements April to September 2013: • ‘More Affordable Childcare’ was published on 16 July 2013, completing the Childcare Commission’s work and setting out Government plans to reduce regulation, help parents with the cost of childcare and encourage growth in supply. • On 1 September statutory entitlement to early learning for 20% of two year olds came into effect. Coalition Priority - Improve support for children, young people and families, focusing on the most disadvantaged Achievements April to September 2013: • The revised Special Educational Needs (SEN) Code of Practice and draft regulations were published for consultation on 4 October 2013. • The Children and Families Bill (containing new SEN provisions) has completed Report Stage in the House of Lords. • Consultation launched on placement stability, including proposals to improve the legal position of long term foster care and increasing the requirements for children returning home from care. 7 • Strategy on care leavers published in October 2013; this includes the launch of a joint fund with Cabinet Office to support initiatives to help care leavers. • An Innovation Programme was launched by the department during October 2013. This looks at new ways of delivering services for children in care to improve outcomes. • The Pupil Premium for looked after children increased to £1,900 and widened to those in care for one day or more. • The attainment gap between pupils receiving free school meals (FSM) and their peers at KS1 has narrowed between 2011 and 2013 by 3 percentage points in reading and writing (15% to 12% in reading, 18% to 15% in writing). • 1,997 schools delivered summer schools, attended by 58,200 disadvantaged pupils – a significant increase on 2012 (1,780 schools and 39,000 disadvantaged pupils) – around 50% of all disadvantaged Year 7s reached. • The Education Endowment Foundation 2012-13 annual report shows that 37 project grants were awarded (23 on literacy catch-up) involving 900 schools and over 66,000 pupils. 8 Financial Performance Table 1: Year to date expenditure against Main Estimate Plan Resources (£’000) Capital (£’000) Actual April to Actual April to Actual April to Actual April to Annual Plan Annual Plan September September September September 2013-14 2013-14
Recommended publications
  • Sutton Trust and Education Endowment Foundation
    The Pupil Premium, Next Steps - Sutton Trust and Education Endowment Foundation Date 3 September 2015 Author Mark Upton LGiU/CSN Associate Summary The Sutton Trust and the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) recently hosted a summit meeting bringing together policy-makers, academics and the teaching profession to discuss the future of the pupil premium. It considered a new report Pupil Premium: Next Steps (July 2015) which made a series of recommendations including that the government should automatically reward schools that successfully and consistently improve results for their disadvantaged pupils and for introducing more effective systems to allow schools to identify pupils eligible for pupil premium funding. New polling commissioned for the summit revealed that 50% of primary school teachers and 44% of secondary teachers feel the premium is being used to continue activities that would not otherwise happen due to funding pressures in other areas of their budget. It also shows that the use of evidence in the classroom is growing: 64% of school leaders said they used research to decide how to spend their pupil premium, compared with 52% in 2012. This briefing will be of particular interest to cabinet portfolio and overview and scrutiny (elected) members and senior officers with responsibility for education and for children in care. Briefing in Full The Sutton Trust and the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) recently hosted a summit meeting on the future of the pupil premium bringing together policy-makers, academics and the teaching profession to discuss how best to improve attainment for disadvantaged pupils, and closing the gap between them and their peers.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    Press Office Threadneedle Street London EC2R 8AH T 020 7601 4411 F 020 7601 5460 [email protected] www.bankofengland.co.uk 29 April 2004 Finance for Small Firms - An Eleventh Report The Bank of England today publishes its 11th annual report on Finance for Small Firms. The report reviews the availability of finance for small firms in 2003; how the Basel II Accord might affect access to finance for SMEs; competition in the SME banking market; and it includes a special article on developments in the financing environment for small firms in the last decade. This will be the last such report. In the foreword (copy attached) Nigel Jenkinson, Executive Director for Financial Stability, explains the Bank's decision. Mr Jenkinson says: "In recent years there has been a major expansion in government resources devoted to small firms. The Small Business Service was set up in 2000 as an executive agency of the DTI, to be a centre of excellence on the whole range of small business issues, including access to finance. The Bank has strongly supported the SBS, including seconding one of its senior staff to be the SBS' first Director of Investment and SME Finance from 2000 to 2003." He adds: "Given the substantial improvement in information flows over the past ten years and the growing importance of the SBS in addressing access to finance issues in the government's Action Plan for Small Business, there is no longer a need for the Bank to be involved in these issues. The principal objective of supporting an improvement in the financing relationship has been achieved, and stepping back from the work stream will avoid potential overlap and duplication with the work of the SBS..
    [Show full text]
  • Here: March 2018 the CIVIL SERVICE, Quarterly.Blog.Gov.Uk #Csquarterly BREXIT and BEYOND
    Issue 16 FEATURE Subscribe for free here: March 2018 THE CIVIL SERVICE, quarterly.blog.gov.uk #CSQuarterly BREXIT AND BEYOND FROM ASDA TO BELMARSH – HOW GOVERNMENT IS ATTRACTING THE BEST PRISON OFFICERS ROBOTS LEND GOVERNMENT A HELPING HAND 2 CIVIL SERVICE QUARTERLY CIVIL SERVICE QUARTERLY 3 Issue 16 – March 2018 Issue 16 – March 2018 CONTENTS THE CIVIL SERVICE, BREXIT AND BEYOND Jeremy Heywood, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Civil Service 5 CROSSING THE ‘VALLEY OF DEATH’ Tony Meggs, Chief Executive of the Infrastructure and 10 Projects Authority (IPA) CURIOSITY, CREATIVITY AND A CAN-DO Interview with Andrea Siodmok, Deputy Director, Policy Lab 15 CULTURE – THE LAB COLLECTIVE THE NEW ZEALAND POLICY PROJECT Andrew Kibblewhite, Head of Policy Profession, 18 New Zealand Government PARLIAMENT AND THE CIVIL SERVICE Rt Hon. Andrea Leadsom MP, Leader of the House of Commons 22 FROM ASDA TO BELMARSH – Mark Adam, Prison Officer Recruitment Programme Director, 26 HOW GOVERNMENT IS ATTRACTING Ministry of Justice THE BEST PRISON OFFICERS ROBOTS LEND GOVERNMENT James Merrick-Potter, Cabinet Office Robotic Automation Unit, 31 A HELPING HAND and Daniella Chrysochou, Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Centre of Excellence WHY INNOVATION IS THE KEY Mike Biddle, Programme Director, Innovate UK 34 TO GROWING THE UK ECONOMY LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – UKGI Digital Land Team 38 TAPPING THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF GEOSPATIAL DATA ACCELERATING INNOVATION Heather-Fiona Egan, Defence and Security Accelerator 42 IN DEFENCE AND SECURITY Civil Service Quarterly opens CONTACT US EDITORIAL BOARD up the Civil Service to greater [email protected] Sir Chris Wormald, Permanent Secretary, collaboration and challenge, Room 140, 70 Whitehall, Department of Health (chair) showcases excellence and invites London, SW1A 2AS discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Type Document Title Here
    New cabinet secretary Simon Case has a lot to prove and even more to do Blog post by Senior Associate Joe Armitage, 2 September 2020 Simon Case, who was appointed permanent secretary of 10 Downing Street this May, has been confirmed as the next cabinet secretary. At 41, he is the youngest person in the position since Lord Hankey, for whom the role was created in 1916, during the middle of the Great War. Like Hankey, Case will sit next to the prime minister at meetings of the Cabinet and assume ultimate responsibility for the management of the government’s bureaucracy at one of the most challenging moments in the country’s history. It’s widely known in Whitehall that he wasn’t the first pick for the job. The prime minister hoped Sharon White - the former CEO of OFCOM and current chairwoman of John Lewis - would agree to re-enter government and take on the role instead. Chris Wormald, permanent secretary of the Department for Health and Social Care, is understood to have been considered second favourite. Key Number 10 political staff have placed a great emphasis on recruiting people with a scientific background into key roles, labelling those with arts degrees and a private education as “public school bluffers.” However, like most of their other key appointments to date, Case’s background is not in keeping with this given that he was independently educated before studying History at Cambridge. Unlike most cabinet secretaries he has not served at either the Treasury or the Foreign Office, he also has no experience of leading a significant government delivery department as permanent secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance, Stakeholder Stability and the Survival of UK Executive Agencies Paper Presented to Public Management Research Confe
    Performance, Stakeholder Stability and the Survival of UK Executive Agencies 1 Paper presented to Public Management Research Conference, Maxwell School of Syracuse University, June 2 nd -4th 2011 Panel 34 International Perspectives on Government Performance Oliver James Department of Politics, University of Exeter (contact author [email protected] ) George A. Boyne Cardiff Business School, University of Cardiff Alice Moseley Department of Politics, University of Exeter Nicolai Petrovsky Martin School, University of Kentucky Abstract: We develop and empirically evaluate a performance management theory of the survival of public organisation as senior management structures. The theory suggests that organisational performance and stakeholder stability - defined as congruence between the stakeholders who set up and those who subsequently assess the organization - are both positively related to survival. We test the theory for semi- autonomous central government executive agencies in UK central government from 1988 to 2011. The key stakeholders for these bodies are executive politicians, who not only set performance targets each year but can also create and abolish them without the need for legislation. The preliminary findings from survival analysis incorporating a set of control variables suggests that, for the performance variables, only high performance is a predictor of lower risk to survival. However, the congruence of political control between the party initiating an agency and subsequently overseeing it substantially lowers the risk of termination. 1 This paper includes preliminary empirical results from ongoing research. Before quoting the empirical parts of this paper, please check with the contact author whether an updated version is available. Email: [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • Not So 'Arm's Length': Reinterpreting Agencies in UK Central Government
    Not so ‘arm’s length’: reinterpreting agencies in UK central government Thomas Elston, PhD Candidate, International Centre for Public and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, UK Email: [email protected] Paper presented to the panel, Executive Politics and Institutional Approaches, convened by the Executive Politics & Governance specialist group at the annual conference of the Political Studies Association (PSA) in Cardiff, March 2013 ***Comments welcome; please do not cite without permission*** Abstract As prominent expressions of new public management (NPM) and its recent attenuation, agencification and de-agencification have been subject to sustained empiricist investigation. However, interpretive analysis remains incipient. Accordingly, this paper explores the evolution of agencification within the UK by attending to its changing discursive construction. Drawing on a three-part analytic framework, which interprets meaning through the rhetoric of argumentation, narrative voice and discursive differentiation, the recent Public Bodies Reforms are shown to narrate a significant reinterpretation of the original executive agency idea of the Next Steps programme. In particular, the old emphasis on managerialist empowerment and decentralisation has given way to new themes of corporate integration and ministerial control. Thus, while no formal or legal redefinition has occurred, the UK’s ‘arm’s-length’ agency model has been discursively ‘departmentalised’. This highlights the potential limitations of using empiricist, ‘population
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Appointments, July 2018
    Ministerial appointments, July 2018 Department Secretary of State Permanent Secretary PM The Rt Hon Theresa May MP The Rt Hon Brandon Lewis MP James Cleverly MP (Deputy Gavin Barwell (Chief of Staff) (Party Chairman) Party Chairman) Cabinet Office The Rt Hon David Lidington The Rt Hon Andrea Leadsom The Rt Hon Brandon Lewis MP Oliver Dowden CBE MP Chloe Smith MP (Parliamentary John Manzoni (Chief Exec of Sir Jeremy Heywood CBE MP (Chancellor of the MP (Lord President of the (Minister without portolio) (Parliamentary Secretary, Secretary, Minister for the the Civil Service) (Head of the Civil Duchy of Lancaster and Council and Leader of the HoC) Minister for Implementation) Constitution) Service, Cabinet Minister for the Cabinet Office) Secretary) Treasury (HMT) The Rt Hon Philip Hammond The Rt Hon Elizabeth Truss MP The Rt Hon Mel Stride MP John Glen MP (Economic Robert Jenrick MP (Exchequer Tom Scholar MP (Chief Secretary to the (Financial Secretary to the Secretary to the Treasury) Secretary to the Treasury) Treasury) Treasury) Ministry of Housing, The Rt Hon James Brokenshire Kit Malthouse MP (Minister of Jake Berry MP (Parliamentary Rishi Sunak (Parliamentary Heather Wheeler MP Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth Nigel Adams (Parliamentary Melanie Dawes CB Communities & Local MP State for Housing) Under Secretary of State and Under Secretary of State, (Parliamentary Under Secretary (Parliamentary Under Secretary Under Secretary of State) Government (MHCLG) Minister for the Northern Minister for Local Government) of State, Minister for Housing of State and Minister for Faith) Powerhouse and Local Growth) and Homelessness) Jointly with Wales Office) Business, Energy & Industrial The Rt Hon Greg Clark MP The Rt Hon Claire Perry MP Sam Gyimah (Minister of State Andrew Griffiths MP Richard Harrington MP The Rt Hon Lord Henley Alex Chisholm Strategy (BEIS) (Minister of State for Energy for Universities, Science, (Parliamentary Under Secretary (Parliamentary Under Secretary (Parliamentary Under Secretary and Clean Growth) Research and Innovation).
    [Show full text]
  • NILQ 62. FOREWORD.Qxd
    NILQ 63(4): 509–32 Modernising environmental regulation in Northern Ireland: a case study in devolved decision-making SharoN TurNer aNd CIara BreNNaN School of Law, Queen’s university Belfast * Introduction or over a decade, controversy about the quality of environmental regulation has cast a Fshadow over the effectiveness of environmental governance in Northern Ireland. Most fundamentally this debate has centred on a crisis of confidence about the quality of regulation and a consensus that effective reform depends on the externalisation of this responsibility from central government. Not surprisingly, the causes of weak regulation were rooted in the eclipsing impact of the Troubles and the fossilisation of government that occurred during the decades of Direct Rule.1 However, although the first steps towards meaningful reform were eventually taken under Direct Rule, the restoration of devolution and the stabilising power-sharing process has meant that the trajectory of regulatory reform has been largely shaped by a devolved administration. The purpose of this paper is to examine the nature and implications of that process. Pressure for regulatory reform is an issue that has confronted both configurations of Northern Ireland’s power-sharing Executive. Despite its brief and tumultuous lifespan, the first Ulster Unionist Party (UUP)/Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP)-led administration was immediately faced not only with the evidence of serious regulatory dysfunction but also the first stage of what became a concerted civil society campaign for independent regulation. The collapse of power-sharing did nothing to quell this pressure. Instead, when devolution was restored five years later the new Democratic Unionist/Sinn Fein-led administration was faced once again with pressure for regulatory reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bodies Handbook – Part 1. Classification of Public Bodies: Guidance for Departments
    Public Bodies Handbook – Part 1 Classification Of Public Bodies: Guidance For Departments Introduction 2 Introduction The Importance Of Classification About This Guidance Administrative classification will provide departments with the guidance and ability to create This ‘Classification of Public Bodies’ document is departmental guidance from the Cabinet arm’s length bodies that fulfil their governance objectives within a clear, consistent and Office. It sets out the different categories of the UK’s public bodies, and: comparable system. This system will lead to a simplified and more transparent public bodies’ landscape, promoting greater accountability. It will provide a clear and intelligible map of the provides a high level introduction to the early decision making process for establishing different landscape and aid public and internal understanding of relationships between public bodies types of public bodies; and government ministers. It will also promote efficiency and effectiveness, helping to drive strategic reform of the landscape and the development of best practice models. summarises and provides a first point of reference on the main characteristics of each of the ALBs that the Cabinet Office focusses on, as well as those of other forms of public bodies; and The Classification Framework provides information on the some of the now defunct or legacy forms of public bodies that The system of administrative classification comprises the ‘framework’, and the ‘process’ of still exist. applying that framework to public bodies. This is the part of the classification system that handles the application of the framework as public bodies are established, modified or closed. This document is to be read as an introduction and high-level guide for establishing public The framework is the supporting structure to administrative classification.
    [Show full text]
  • 191004 VCA Framework Agreement FINAL
    Vehicle Certification Agency Framework Agreement Moving Britain Ahead August 2016 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.gov.uk/dft General enquiries: https://forms.dft.gov.uk © Crown copyright 2020 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected] Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Contents 1. Introduction 5 2. The Agency 6 Main Activities 6 Review 7 3. Governance and Accountability 9 Ministers and Parliament 9 Parliamentary business 9 The role of the Department 9 Submissions to Ministers 11 Chief Executive 11 4. The Agency Board 14 The Chair’s Personal Responsibilities 15 Non-Executive Directors 16 Board sub-groups 16 Board effectiveness 17 Board appointments 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan 2018 / 19 Contents
    Business Plan 2018 / 19 Contents NISRA at a glance Chief Executive’s Foreword 1 Context 2 Vision & Mission 3 Principles of Purpose 4 Balanced Scorecards 2018 / 19 5 NISRA (Statistics and Research) Balanced Scorecard 7 General Registrar’s Office Balanced Scorecard 9 Official Statistics 11 Financial Resources 14 Appendix 1: NISRA Branch Details 16 Appendix 2: NISRA DoF Targets 25 Appendix 3: Glossary 26 NISRA at a glance Headquarters Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency Colby House, Stranmillis Court, BELFAST, BT9 5RR. Status Executive Agency within the Department of Finance (DoF) Chief Executive & Registrar General Siobhan Carey Number of staff at 1 April 2018 484 staff in total of which 50 are (currently) temporary Structure 42 branches, across 22 Government Departments, Executive Agencies, Arms’ Length Bodies, and Local Councils Vision Trusted statistics and research for a better society Website www.nisra.gov.uk Email [email protected] NISRA BUSINESS PLAN 2018 / 19 Chief Executive’s Foreword This year is one of those years when we will look back and say it was a watershed moment. The context in which we operate is changing, there are new data sources becoming available and there are new tools and techniques that can be deployed. The Digital Economy Act (DEA) provides new gateways to share and link data for the production of statistics and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) strengthens the requirements to be transparent about what we do with data and how we protect it. And there is increased demand for sound evidence. The draft Programme for Government has data front and centre.
    [Show full text]
  • The Performance of the Department for Education 2013-14
    Departmental Overview The performance of the Department for Education 2013-14 DECEMBER 2014 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO, which employs some 820 employees. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £1.1 billion in 2013. Contents Introduction Aim and scope of this briefing 4 Part One About the Department 5 Part Two Developments in this Parliament 13 Part Three Recent NAO findings on the Department 28 Appendix One The Department’s sponsored bodies at 1 April 2014 49 Appendix Two Results of the Civil Service People Survey 2013 50 Appendix Three Publications by the NAO on the Department since April 2013 52 Appendix Four Cross-government reports of relevance to the Department since September 2013 53 Endnotes 54 Links to external websites were valid at the time of publication of this report. The National Audit Office is not responsible for the future validity of the links.
    [Show full text]