Taking the Nicotine out of Cigarettes – Why It Is a Bad Idea Clive Bates1
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Special Theme – Tobacco Taking the nicotine out of cigarettes – why it is a bad idea Clive Bates1 Sometimes, what seems to be an obvious common- the light cigarettes give low tar and nicotine readings sense idea can make a bad situation much worse. One on machines but unchanged doses to the smoker. such idea is the removal of nicotine from tobacco Switching from full-flavour cigarettes to light cigar- products to make them less addictive. Nicotine is ettes is a little like trying to reduce alcohol intake by addictive, it is the reason why people smoke, and switching from wine to beer. smoking tobacco without nicotine is no more With light cigarettes the tobacco is almost the appealing than smoking dried cabbage. And so, it is same as in conventional cigarettes, and an attempt to argued, why not use regulatory powers to require the reduce its nicotine content would make matters gradual removal of nicotine from tobacco products? worse: the smoke would not be diluted, but it would Could this free smokers from their dependence and have a lower concentration of nicotine. This means stop a new generation of children becoming smokers would be taking in more undiluted smoke to addicted? This approach is advocated by the attain the nicotine they need. If this happened their American Medical Association, though with some toxic exposure would increase and the health impact qualification (see http://tc.bmjjournals.com/content/ would be serious — possibly adding millions to the vol7/issue3/). It was also voiced by a number of the expected tobacco-related death toll. participants at a recent WHO seminar on the The idea of removing nicotine also has to be regulation of tobacco products, which ultimately acknowledgedasprohibition.Smokerswhoexperience recommended that governments ‘‘give urgent prior- withdrawal wouldbemorelikelytoseek illegalsupplies, ity to studying the implications for harm reduction of hand rolling tobacco, etc., rather than quit. And while reducing levels of nicotine and other possible nicotine products are available in some form, teenagers addictive constituents in tobacco products over would simply continue to do what adults do. If a time’’ (see http://www.who.int/toh/natcapacity/ government tried to remove alcohol from whisky, but prodregulation/oslo/osloreport.htm). This recom- claimed that it was not engaging in prohibition because mendation was a compromise between those who whiskywithoutalcoholcouldstillbesold,wewouldnot want nicotine removed and others, like me, who be so easily fooled. A worldwide ban on nicotine is a think it would not work at all. political non-starter and would be a disaster. The basic reality of tobacco use is the self- If removing nicotine will not work, what is the administration of nicotine, a powerfully addictive alternative? It should be recognized that nicotine is a psychoactive drug, by over a thousand million people widely used, addictive and legal drug in society — but worldwide—atotallikelytoriseto1 600 000 000inthe its delivery system kills one in two long-term users, next twenty years. Tobacco users typically begin in the and this level of harm justifies serious regulatory teenageyearswithaflirtationwiththeartificiallycreated controls and interventions. Regulators should be glamour, danger, and forbidden fruit of smoking and to concentrating on cleaning up the delivery system, and feel a peer-group bonding with thosearound them who tending to increase the amount of nicotine in the are engaging in the same flirtation. After a while — as smoke relative to toxic smoke constituents such as tar little as a few months — the habit is reinforced by and carbon monoxide. Regulatory pressure may be addiction: modification of the smoker’s behaviour to used to force selective reduction of tobacco toxins seek the reward and avoid the unpleasant withdrawal. relative to nicotine by the use of chemically active Tobacco users come to expect and need a certain dose filters, a switch from burning to heating tobacco, and of nicotine to get through the day. Quitting becomes greater use of oral tobacco, tobacco distillates and harder, and the addiction becomes entrenched and perhaps, ultimately, to nicotine delivery devices that consolidated by behavioural and social reinforcement. do not use tobacco at all but, unlike current nicotine The problem with the nicotine-removal idea is replacement therapies (patches and gum, etc.), that tobacco users would continue to seek nicotine up deliver a psychoactive and satisfying dose of nicotine to the level that provides a satisfactory dose. This is to the addict. None of these approaches avoids all the reason why ‘light’ cigarettes are such a fraud. With harm — far from it — but the evolution (rather than light cigarettes, the smoke is diluted with air drawn prohibition) of addictive nicotine delivery products through ventilation holes in the filter, but smokers represents an important strategy in reducing tobacco- respond by taking in more of the weaker smoke to related deaths in the 21st century. attain the nicotine they need. The machines used for Dealing with nicotine addiction involves many of measuring cigarettes do not respond in this way, so the established tools of tobacco control: price increases, advertising bans, communications programmes, restric- 1 Action on Smoking and Health, 102 Clifton Street, London EC2A tions on smoking at work and in public places, and 4HW, England. access to good treatment for dependence. Addiction to Ref. No. 00-0798 nicotine cannot be tackled by modifying the product. n 944 Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2000, 78 (7).