DOCSLIB.ORG

United States District Court Northern District of Illinois

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States District Court Northern District of Illinois Case: 1:19-cv-01339 Document #: 179 Filed: 01/06/20 Page 1 of 211 PageID #:3648 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS UNION ASSET MANAGEMENT HOLDING Case No. 1:19-cv-01339 AG and SJUNDE AP-FONDEN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Honorable Robert M. Dow Jr. Plaintiffs, v. THE KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY, 3G CAPITAL PARTNERS, 3G CAPITAL, INC., 3G GLOBAL FOOD HOLDINGS, L.P., 3G GLOBAL FOOD HOLDINGS GP LP, 3G CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, 3G CAPITAL PARTNERS II LP, 3G CAPITAL PARTNERS LTD., BERNARDO HEES, PAULO BASILIO, DAVID KNOPF, ALEXANDRE BEHRING, GEORGE ZOGHBI, and RAFAEL OLIVEIRA, Defendants. CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case: 1:19-cv-01339 Document #: 179 Filed: 01/06/20 Page 2 of 211 PageID #:3648 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 1 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ........................................................................................... 12 III. PARTIES .............................................................................................................................. 12 A. Plaintiffs ................................................................................................................ 12 B. Defendants ............................................................................................................ 13 IV. SUMMARY OF THE FRAUD ............................................................................................ 15 A. Background On The Merger ................................................................................. 15 B. Defendants Understood That In Order For The Market To View The Kraft Heinz Merger As Successful, The Company Would Have To Promise Sustainable Cost Savings And Brand Investment To Drive Long-Term Growth .................................................................................................................. 18 C. From The Beginning Of The Class Period, Defendants Falsely Assured Investors That Kraft Heinz Was Implementing Sustainable Cost Cuts And Investing Significantly In Its Brands .................................................................... 21 D. Unbeknownst To Investors, Kraft Heinz Implemented Destructive, Unsustainable Cost-Cutting Measures .................................................................. 25 1. Contrary To Defendants’ Public Statements, Kraft Heinz Implemented Unsustainable Cost-Cutting Measures That Severely Impaired The Company’s Operations And Damaged Its Brands ............. 27 a. Cost Cuts To Kraft Heinz’s Core Supply Chain Functions, Which Began Immediately After The Merger, Caused Massive Disruptions In Customer Fulfillment .............................. 31 (1) Elimination Of Maintenance And Product Quality Functions. .......................................................................... 32 (2) Indiscriminate Layoffs ...................................................... 35 (3) Third-Party Supplier And Vendor Functions .................... 39 (4) Failure To Integrate SAP .................................................. 43 (5) Facility Closures ............................................................... 45 i Case: 1:19-cv-01339 Document #: 179 Filed: 01/06/20 Page 3 of 211 PageID #:3648 (6) Longstanding Supply Chain Issues Materially Impacted Kraft Heinz’s Supply Chain Performance And Service Levels Beginning Immediately After The Merger........................................................................ 47 b. Cost Cuts To Kraft Heinz’s Core Brand Support Function Led To Lost Revenue, Distribution, And Pricing Power .............. 51 (1) Cuts To Kraft Heinz’s R&D ............................................. 52 (2) Cuts To Kraft Heinz’s Product Quality ............................ 54 (3) Cuts To Kraft Heinz’s Salesforce ..................................... 56 (4) Cuts To Kraft Heinz’s Marketing ..................................... 57 c. Kraft Heinz’s Incentive Structure Further Fueled These Destructive Cuts ............................................................................ 60 2. Kraft Heinz’s Cuts To Operations And Brand Equity Support Soured Its Relationships With Its Retail Customers, Including Walmart, And Impacted Revenue ............................................................. 62 3. Kraft Heinz Ramped Up Its Fraud Following Kraft Heinz’s Failed Bid To Acquire Unilever Amid Declining Sales ...................................... 65 4. At The Same Time, Kraft Heinz’s Cost-Cutting Practices Led To A Steep Decline In The Company’s Canadian Retail Business ................... 72 5. The Company’s Executives Knew About The Range Of Destructive Cost-Cutting Practices And That The Cost Cuts Were Not Limited To “Synergies” .......................................................................................... 78 6. To Further Create The Illusion Of Sustainable Cost-Cutting, Kraft Heinz Engaged In Accounting Fraud ........................................................ 81 a. Kraft Heinz Improperly Delayed Reporting Mandated Impairments Of Its Intangible Assets ........................................... 81 b. Background To The $15.4 Billion Impairments: The Merger And Purchase Price Accounting ................................................... 82 c. Kraft Heinz Improperly Delayed Impairment Of Its Intangible Assets ........................................................................... 84 d. The Procurement Division Fraud .................................................. 87 ii Case: 1:19-cv-01339 Document #: 179 Filed: 01/06/20 Page 4 of 211 PageID #:3648 7. As Defendants Eventually Admitted, Kraft Heinz’s Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Suffered From Material Weaknesses ............................................................................................... 89 a. Defendants’ Certifications Of Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Were Material To Investors ......................... 89 b. Defendants’ Certifications Of Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting Were False .................................................... 91 E. While In Possession Of Material Non-Public Information And Just Prior To The Collapse Of Kraft Heinz’s Stock Price, 3G Capital Reaped More Than A Billion Dollars From The Sale Of Kraft Heinz Stock ....................................... 93 F. The Truth Emerges ............................................................................................... 94 1. Kraft Heinz Announced Declining Earnings And Margins Driven By “One-Off” Events: A Failure To Achieve Cost Savings, Price Reductions, And Investments To Support The Company’s Brands ......... 94 2. Kraft Heinz Stunned Investors By Announcing $15.4 Billion In Intangible Impairment Charges And An SEC Investigation..................... 99 3. The Aftermath Of The Company’s Massive Impairment Announcement ........................................................................................ 104 4. Kraft Heinz Announced A Restatement Of Its Financials Since The Merger And A Broadened Investigation By The SEC............................ 106 5. Kraft Heinz Disclosed Material Weaknesses In Its Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting And A Department Of Justice Investigation ............................................................................................ 108 6. Kraft Heinz Disclosed Its Need To Reinvest Substantially In Its Brands And Operations To Remain Competitive ................................... 111 G. Post-Class Period Developments ........................................................................ 114 V. ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS THAT DEFENDANTS KNOWINGLY OR RECKLESSLY MISLED INVESTORS REGARDING KRAFT HEINZ’S TRUE FINANCIAL CONDITION ............................................................................................ 114 VI. DEFENDANTS’ MATERIALLY FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS AND OMISSIONS ......................................................................................................... 125 A. Defendants’ False And Misleading Statements Concerning Kraft Heinz’s Cost-Cutting Measures And Investments In The Company’s Brands, Infrastructure, And Operations ........................................................................... 126 iii Case: 1:19-cv-01339 Document #: 179 Filed: 01/06/20 Page 5 of 211 PageID #:3648 1. Defendants’ False And Misleading Statements During 2015 ................. 126 a. Misstatements Concerning The Character Of Kraft Heinz’s Cost Savings And The Impact Of Cost-Cutting Efforts ............. 126 b. Misstatements Touting Defendants’ Investments In The Company’s Brands, Operations, And Infrastructure ................... 128 c. Market And Analyst Reaction To Defendants’ 2015 Misstatements ............................................................................. 129 2. Defendants’ False And Misleading Statements During 2016 ................. 129 a. Misstatements Concerning The Character Of Kraft Heinz’s Cost Savings Program And The Program’s Impact .................... 130 b. Misstatements Touting Defendants’ Investments In The Company’s Brands, Operations, And Infrastructure ................... 135 c. Market And Analyst Reaction To Defendants’ 2016 Misstatements ............................................................................. 138 3. Defendants’ False And Misleading Statements During 2017 ................. 139 a. Misstatements Concerning The Character Of Kraft Heinz’s Cost-Savings Program And The Program’s Impact.................... 140 b. Misstatements
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forthlane Fridays - Guest Bios
    Forthlane Fridays - Guest Bios Maria S. Jelescu Dreyfus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND FOUNDER ARDINALL INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Maria is the Chief Executive Officer and Founder of Ardinall Investment Management, an investment firm focused on energy infrastructure that she started in 2017. Prior to Ardinall Investment Management, Ms. Dreyfus spent 15 years at Goldman Sachs, where she most recently served as a Portfolio Manager and Managing Director in the Goldman Sachs Investment Partners (GSIP) Group. She currently serves as a director on the board of Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation (NYSE: MIC), on the board of CDPQ (one of Canada’s largest pension plans), and on the advisory board of Eni Next (Eni SpA’s corporate venture arm). She also sits on the advisory board of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University and serves as co-chair of their Women in Energy program. Additionally, Ms. Dreyfus is a member of the MIT Corporation’s Development Committee and sits on the MIT Economics Department’s Visiting Committee. Ms. Dreyfus also serves as a member of the New York State Secure Choice Savings Program Board. Her current and past non-profit board memberships include New America Alliance, Breakthrough New York, and Girls Inc. of NYC. She is a member of the Economic Club of New York and a member of the Milken Institute’s Young Leaders Circle. Ms. Dreyfus has held her CFA since 2004, and holds a dual degree in economics and management science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Daniel Dreyfus CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER AND FOUNDER BORNITE CAPITAL Dan serves as the Founder and Chief Investment Officer at Bornite Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • The Preqin Quarterly Update: Private Equity
    Q1 2013 The Preqin Quarterly Update: Private Equity Content Includes: Fundraising We review the latest fundraising figures, including regional breakdown, time spent on the road, and the largest funds to close in the quarter. Investors We take a look at investor appetite for private equity in the year ahead, including geographies and strategies to be targeted. Buyout Deals We examine private equity buyout deals and exits in Q1 2013 by type, value and region. Venture Capital Deals We provide a breakdown of the latest venture capital deal activity by value, region and stage. Performance We analyze the latest performance data for private equity funds, featuring dry powder figures, IRRs by fund type and vintage and the PrEQIn Private Equity Quarterly Index. alternative assets. intelligent data. The Preqin Quarterly Update: Private Equity, Q1 2013 Download Data Foreword Private equity fundraising in the fi rst quarter of 2013 was relatively robust, with 130 funds closed having raised an aggregate $67.2bn. However, in an increasingly competitive fundraising market – 1,906 funds are in market as of the start of Q2 2013 – many LPs are choosing to invest in funds raised by more established managers. First-time funds that closed in Q1 2013 secured just $4.2bn in aggregate capital, compared to the peak of $31.6bn in Q2 2008. However, Preqin’s interviews with private equity investors in December 2012 reveal that investor attitudes towards fi rst-time fund managers are more positive moving forwards; half of LPs interviewed will consider committing to fi rst-time funds or those managed by spin-off teams in the following 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Kraft Heinz Merger
    Kraft Heinz Merger Mohd Sakib Agenda n Overview of Merger Companies n Deal Terms and Merger Structure n Synergies and Risks n Effects on Investors – 3G Capital and Berkshire Hathaway n Future of Kraft Heinz 4/22/15 Wall Street Club 2 Overview of Kraft n Kraft Foods Group, Inc. is a consumer packaged food and beverage company founded in 1903 – Operates in six segments; portfolio of >70 major brands – Primarily serves supermarket chains, club stores, retail food outlets, etc n Kraft split into Kraft Foods, focusing on grocery products in North America, and Mondelez International Inc., focused on snacks – Stable financial performance – $18 Billion in annual sales – 9 brands with more than $500 Million in annual sales 4/22/15 Wall Street Club 3 Overview of Heinz n H.J. Heinz Company is a global food player that was established in 1869 – Three core categories: Ketchup and Sauces, Meals and Snacks, and Infant/Nutrition – Products have #1 or #2 market share in 50+ countries n Acquired by Warren Buffett and 3G Capital for $28 Billion in 2013 – Appealing due to strong, durable brands and global presence – Strong international presence with emerging market sales consisting of 25% of total revenue 4/22/15 Wall Street Club 4 Deal Terms and Merger Structure n Stock for stock merger possibly valued at $46.6 Billion and orchestrated by Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital – Heinz will control 51% whereas Kraft will own remaining 49% n $10 Billion special cash dividend to be paid out by 3G and Berkshire – Kraft shareholders will receive $16.50 a share, representing
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Terpins and Rodrigo Terpins (Collectively, the "Defendants") and Relief
    SANJAY WADHWA Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION New York Regional Office 3 World Financial Center, Suite 400 New York, New York 10281 (212) 336-0181 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----~-------------------------------------------------------------------x SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -against- 13 Civ. 1080 (JSR) MICHEL TERPINS and ECFCASE RODRIGO TERPINS, AMENDED Defendants, COMPLAINT -and- ALPINE SWIFT LTD. Relief Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------x Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission"), for its Complaint against defendants Michel Terpins and Rodrigo Terpins (collectively, the "Defendants") and relief defendant Alpine Swift Ltd. ("Alpine Swift") alleges as follows: SUMMARY 1. This is an insider trading case involving highly suspicious trading in call option contracts ("calls") ofH.J. Heinz Company ("Heinz") the day prior to the February 14, 2013 announcement that Heinz had entered into an agreement to be acquired for $72.50 per share by an investment consortium comprised of Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital (the "Announcement"). The $72.50 per share price represented a 20% premium to Heinz's closing share price on February 13, 2013. As a result of the Announcement, Heinz's stock price increased from a close of$60.48 on February 13 to a close of$72.50 on February 14, an increase of nearly 20%. 2. The Defendants arranged for the purchase of the Heinz calls in advance of the Announcement using a Swiss account held by Alpine Swift, a corporate entity formed to hold assets for which a close relative of the Defendants was the ultimate beneficial owner. Specifically, on February 13, the day prior to the Announcement, the Defendants used Alpine Swift's account to purchase 2,533 out-of-the money June $65 calls for a total of nearly $90,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SUPPLY CHAIN AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS LOGISTIC INTEGRATION: THE OVERLOOKED FORCE DRIVING THE FUTURE OF THE KRAFT HEINZ MERGER TANNER VANKLEECK SPRING 2016 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Accounting and Finance with honors in Supply Chain and Information Systems Reviewed and approved* by the following: Robert Novack Associate Professor of Supply Chain Management Thesis Supervisor John Spychalski Professor Emeritus of Supply Chain Management Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT Over the past three decades, mergers and acquisitions have become an integral component of the economic system. Although the financial crises of 2008 cut M&A activity in half, the past four years have seen volume and value of M&A deals recover to near record highs. Fueled by cheap credit and a need to expand, the economy is appearing to be in the midst of another merger wave. Although the macroeconomic events driving these waves and the individual motives behind each merger are ever changing, the failure rate of mergers has remained fairly constant. Between sixty and eighty percent of all mergers end without achieving the desired economic return. Although much research has been done regarding this topic, success rates have not improved. The issue concerning many of these deals is that they are only analyzed on the financial level, and not at the logistical operating level. The result is that many potential financial synergies and gains are not realized since the logistics networks either cannot be combined or the integration is handled poorly.
    [Show full text]
  • Amrest Holdings SE 28 FEBRUARY 2020
    (all figures in EUR millions unless stated otherwise) Consolidated Directors’ Report for the year ended 31 December 2019 AmRest Holdings SE 28 FEBRUARY 2020 Net 1 AmRest Group Consolidated Directors’ Report for the year ended 31 December 201 9 (all figures in EUR millions unless stated otherwise) 2 AmRest Group Consolidated Directors’ Report for the year ended 31 December 201 9 (all figures in EUR millions unless stated otherwise) Contents LETTER TO THE SHAREHOLDERS ........................................................................................................................................ 4 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (CONSOLIDATED DATA) ........................................................................................................... 6 GROUP BUSINESS OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................. 7 FINANCIAL AND ASSET POSITION OF THE GROUP ...................................................................................................... 12 BRANDS OPERATED BY THE GROUP............................................................................................................................... 21 KEY INVESTMENTS .............................................................................................................................................................. 25 PLANNED INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Publisher's Version
    Source: Management and Finance Online Published by: Harvard Extension Student Journal: Vol. 2. No. 2 (July, 2019) Management and Finance Club (HESMFC) ANALYSIS OF HEINZ COMPANY’S ACQUISITION OF KRAFT FOODS GROUP INC. MANAGEMENT AND FINANCE ONLINE JOURNAL Published by Harvard Extension Student Management and Finance Club (HESMFC) HESMFC is a not-for-profit, student organization, an affiliate of Harvard Extension Student Association (HESA) that serves as a platform for academic publication. The HESMFC online journal helps student researchers and scholars to publish a wide range of topics in the fields of business management and finance. Author(s): David A.J. Abrahams • URL : https://hesmfc.extension.harvard.edu/ Management and Finance Online Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, (July, 2019), Published by Harvard Extension Stude nt Management and Finance Club AANALYSISNALYSIS OF HEINZ COMPANY’S ACQUISITION OF KRAFT FOODS GROUP INC. David A.J. Abrahams Harvard Extension School, Harvard University, 51 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States Email: [email protected] David A.J. Abrahams has a Master of Science degree in Financial Macro-Economics with a specialization in Monetary Economics from Erasmus University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ABSTRACT He is currently pursuing Master of Liberal Arts degree in the field of Management at Harvard Extension School. Currently, he is a Resolution Officer at De Nederlandsche Bank (Central Bank of The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Previously he worked at the Boards of Financial Supervision (Curacao and Sint Maarten, This article discusses the acquisition of Kraft Foods Group Inc. by H.J. Heinz Dutch Caribbean) and both Co. to form the Kraft Heinz Company.
    [Show full text]
  • KRAFT FOODS INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 7, 2012 KRAFT FOODS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 1-16483 52-2284372 (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer of Incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) Three Lakes Drive, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2753 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (847) 646-2000 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure. This information will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terpins Brothers and the Heinz Takeover a Case Study of Company Valuation and Insider Trading in Options∗
    The Terpins Brothers and the Heinz Takeover A Case Study of Company Valuation and Insider Trading in Options∗ Patrick Augustiny Menachem Brennerz Marti G. Subrahmanyamx McGill University, Desautels New York University, Stern New York University, Stern January 19, 2015 Abstract This teaching case study illustrates the illicit insider trades in equity options ahead of the Heinz takeover by Berkshire Hathaway and 3G Capital. The case introduces students to various concepts of option valuation and option strategies. These include option payoff diagrams, put-call parity, arbitrage strategies, the Black-Scholes formula, and option Greeks, as well as an application to company valuation using the Merton model. Keywords: Case Study; Derivatives; Insider Trading; Mergers and Acquisitions; Methodology; Options; Teaching JEL Classification: A22; A23; A29; B40; G13, G14, G34, G38, K22, K41 Target Audience: Advanced Bachelor, M.Sc., MBA, Executive MBA ∗We thank Christopher Dou for truly outstanding research assistance. All errors remain our own. yMcGill University - Desautels Faculty of Management, 1001 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G5, Canada. Email: [email protected]. zNew York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business, 44 West 4th St., NY 10012-1126 New York, USA. Email: [email protected]. xNew York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business, 44 West 4th St., NY 10012-1126 New York, USA. Email: [email protected]. 1 Introduction On February 14, 2013, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and 3G Capital announced a deal in which the world famous ketchup maker H.J. Heinz Co would eventually be purchased for USD $28 billion. 1 This would result in an offer price of USD $72.50 per H.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Kraft Foods Group Investor Day
    The New Kraft Foods Group Investor Day September 7, 2012 Chris Jakubik Vice President, Investor Relations Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains a number of forward-looking statements. The words “plan,” “drive,” “build,” “focus,” “manage,” “can,” “will,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify our forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our strategic plans, financial targets and long-term guidance, including revenue and operating income growth, margins, EPS and market share; our future dividends; our restructuring costs; our opportunities to improve profitability and generate cash; our plans to provide ongoing guidance; and our expectations and goals for efficiency and productivity, resource allocation, reinvestment in our business, input cost management, sales execution, cash management, free cash flow, innovation and employee recruitment, compensation and investment. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; continued consumer weakness and weakness in economic conditions; our ability to differentiate our products from retailer and economy brands; our ability to maintain our reputation and brand image; continued volatility of, and sharp increases in, commodity and other input costs; pricing actions; increased costs of sales; regulatory or legal changes, restrictions or actions; unanticipated expenses and business disruptions; product recalls and product liability claims; unexpected safety or manufacturing issues; our indebtedness and our ability to pay our indebtedness; our inability to protect our intellectual property rights; and tax law changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kraft Foods Inc (Kft)
    KRAFT FOODS INC (KFT) 8-K Current report filing Filed on 08/02/2012 Filed Period 08/02/2012 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 2, 2012 KRAFT FOODS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 1-16483 52-2284372 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) Three Lakes Drive, Northfield, Illinois 60093-2753 (Address of Principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's Telephone number, including area code: (847) 646-2000 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below): ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. On August 4, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors intends to create two independent public companies: (i) a global snacks business, Mondelēz International, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • FINANCIAL POST MAGAZINE (EDITORIAL) 34 1450 Don Mills Road, Suite 300 FAMILY FINANCE
    > > Ready for his close-up Encana CEO Randy Eresman steps into the spotlight with a great big bet on natural gas MAY 2010 =@E8E:@8CGFJKD8>8Q@E< 00504FPM001504FPM001 1 44/14/10/14/10 55:06:45:06:45 PPMM MAY/10 CONTENTS. CANADA’S BUSINESS VOICE 6 Feedback Editor Terence Corcoran 9 Editor’s Letter Deputy Editor Cooper Langford Contributing Editors Mark Anderson (Ottawa), Dan Bortolotti, Paul Brent, 11 Jamie Golombek, John Greenwood, Andy Holloway, FIRST BUSINESS. Brian Hutchinson (Vancouver), Sanam Islam, George Koch 11 Mover. 3G Capital rethinks the (Calgary), Dana Lacey, David Leach (Victoria), Kevin hedge fund. 13 At A Glance. Glob- Libin (Calgary), Ken Mark, Jared Mitchell, Karin Mizgala Big Fish. (Vancouver), Joanna Pachner, A.J. Sull (Vancouver) al debt: Who owes what? =@E8E:@8CGFJKD8>8Q@E< A maritime technology comes Art ashore and wins . 14 Innovator. Art Director Lina McPhee Ostara makes water treatment Assistant Art Director Brianna Freitag cleaner and cheaper. Infographic Contributing Artists Solo dancers: The loonie vs. Andrew Barr, Kevin Hewitt, Frances Juriansz, Will Lew, Kagan GDP. 15 My Word. Why native McLeod, Darcy Muenchrath, Sandy Nicholson, Jonathon Rivait, reserves need private property Graham Roumieu, Nick Westover, Daniel Wood FINANCIAL POST MAGAZINE (EDITORIAL) 34 1450 Don Mills Road, Suite 300 FAMILY FINANCE. Toronto, Ontario M3B 3R5 34 Family File. Jacques and Phone: 416-383-2300 Fax: 416-386-2836 Marie fear Jacques will lose his E-mail: [email protected] job before retirement. Do they Customer service: 1-800-668-7678 have enough to manage? 37 www.financialpost.com/magazine Boomer vs Junior.
    [Show full text]